Normalized to: Ivanushkina, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.2448 [pdf] - 222203
Paper II: Calibration of the Swift ultraviolet/optical telescope
Breeveld, A. A.;
Curran, P. A.;
Hoversten, E. A.;
Koch, S.;
Landsman, W.;
Marshall, F. E.;
Page, M. J.;
Poole, T. S.;
Roming, P.;
Smith, P. J.;
Still, M.;
Yershov, V.;
Blustin, A. J.;
Brown, P. J.;
Gronwall, C.;
Holland, S. T.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
McGowan, K.;
Rosen, S.;
Boyd, P.;
Broos, P.;
Carter, M.;
Chester, M. M.;
Hancock, B.;
Huckle, H.;
Immler, S.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
Kennedy, T.;
Mason, K. O.;
Morgan, A. N.;
Oates, S.;
de Pasquale, M.;
Schady, P.;
Siegel, M.;
Berk, D. Vanden
Submitted: 2010-04-14
The Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments onboard
the Swift observatory. The photometric calibration has been published, and this
paper follows up with details on other aspects of the calibration including a
measurement of the point spread function with an assessment of the orbital
variation and the effect on photometry. A correction for large scale variations
in sensitivity over the field of view is described, as well as a model of the
coincidence loss which is used to assess the coincidence correction in extended
regions. We have provided a correction for the detector distortion and measured
the resulting internal astrometric accuracy of the UVOT, also giving the
absolute accuracy with respect to the International Celestial Reference System.
We have compiled statistics on the background count rates, and discuss the
sources of the background, including instrumental scattered light. In each case
we describe any impact on UVOT measurements, whether any correction is applied
in the standard pipeline data processing or whether further steps are
recommended.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.2259 [pdf] - 254895
Photometric Calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope
Poole, T. S.;
Breeveld, A. A.;
Page, M. J.;
Landsman, W.;
Holland, S. T.;
Roming, P.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Brown, P. J.;
Gronwall, C.;
Hunsberger, S.;
Koch, S.;
Mason, K. O.;
Schady, P.;
Berk, D. Vanden;
Blustin, A. J.;
Boyd, P.;
Broos, P.;
Carter, M.;
Chester, M. M.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Hancock, B.;
Huckle, H.;
Immler, S.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
Kennedy, T.;
Marshall, F.;
Morgan, A.;
Pandey, S.;
de Pasquale, M.;
Smith, P. J.;
Still, M.
Submitted: 2007-08-16, last modified: 2007-11-09
We present the photometric calibration of the Swift UltraViolet/Optical
Telescope (UVOT) which includes: optimum photometric and background apertures,
effective area curves, colour transformations, conversion factors for count
rates to flux, and the photometric zero points (which are accurate to better
than 4 per cent) for each of the seven UVOT broadband filters. The calibration
was performed with observations of standard stars and standard star fields that
represent a wide range of spectral star types. The calibration results include
the position dependent uniformity, and instrument response over the 1600-8000A
operational range. Because the UVOT is a photon counting instrument, we also
discuss the effect of coincidence loss on the calibration results. We provide
practical guidelines for using the calibration in UVOT data analysis. The
results presented here supersede previous calibration results.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0604316 [pdf] - 81385
Optical, Infrared, and Ultraviolet Observations of the X-Ray Flash GRB
050416A
Holland, S. T.;
Boyd, P. T.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Hjorth, J.;
Schady, P.;
Thomsen, B.;
Augusteijn, T.;
Blustin, A. J.;
Breeveld, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gronwall, C.;
Hunsberger, S.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
Landsman, W.;
Laursen, P.;
McGowan, K.;
Mangano, V.;
Markwardt, C. B.;
Marshall, F.;
Mason, K. O.;
Moretti, A.;
Page, M. J.;
Poole, T.;
Roming, P.;
Rosen, S.;
Still, M.
Submitted: 2006-04-13, last modified: 2006-09-26
We present ultraviolet, optical, and infrared photometry of the afterglow of
the X-ray flash XRF 050416A taken between approximately 100 seconds and 36 days
after the burst. We find an intrinsic spectral slope between 1930 and 22,200
Angstrom of beta = -1.14 +/- 0.20 and a decay rate of alpha = -0.86 +/- 0.15.
There is no evidence for a change in the decay rate between approximately 0.7
and 4.7 days after the burst. Our data implies that there is no spectral break
between the optical and X-ray bands between 0.7 and 4.7 days after the burst,
and is consistent with the cooling break being redward of the K_s band (22,200
Angstrom) at 0.7 days. The combined ultraviolet/optical/infrared spectral
energy distribution shows no evidence for a significant amount of extinction in
the host galaxy along the line of sight to XRF 050416A. Our data suggest that
the extragalactic extinction along the line of sight to the burst is only
approximately A_V = 0.2 mag, which is significantly less than the extinction
expected from the hydrogen column density inferred from $X$-ray observations of
XRF 050416A assuming a dust-to-gas ratio similar to what is found for the Milky
Way. The observed extinction, however, is consistent with the dust-to-gas ratio
seen in the Small Magellanic Cloud. We suggest that XRF 050416A may have a
two-component jet similar to what has been proposed for GRB 030329. If this is
the case the lack of an observed jet break between 0.7 and 42 days is an
illusion due to emission from the wide jet dominating the afterglow after
approximately 1.5 days.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509273 [pdf] - 75855
Very Early Optical Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for Relative
Paucity of Detection
Roming, P. W. A.;
Schady, P.;
Fox, D. B.;
Zhang, B.;
Liang, E.;
Mason, K. O.;
Rol, E.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Blustin, A. J.;
Boyd, P. T.;
Brown, P.;
Holland, S. T.;
McGowan, K.;
Landsman, W. B.;
Page, K. L.;
Rhoads, J. E.;
Rosen, S. R.;
Berk, D. Vanden;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Breeveld, A. A.;
Cucchiara, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gronwall, C.;
Grupe, D.;
Goad, M. R.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
James, C.;
Kennea, J. A.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Mangano, V.;
Meszaros, P.;
Morgan, A. N.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Poole, T.;
Still, M. D.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Zane, S.
Submitted: 2005-09-10, last modified: 2006-08-16
Very early observations with the Swift satellite of gamma-ray burst (GRB)
afterglows reveal that the optical component is not detected in a large number
of cases. This is in contrast to the bright optical flashes previously
discovered in some GRBs (e.g. GRB 990123 and GRB 021211). Comparisons of the
X-ray afterglow flux to the optical afterglow flux and prompt gamma-ray fluence
is used to quantify the seemingly deficient optical, and in some cases X-ray,
light at these early epochs. This comparison reveals that some of these bursts
appear to have higher than normal gamma-ray efficiencies. We discuss possible
mechanisms and their feasibility for explaining the apparent lack of early
optical emission. The mechanisms considered include: foreground extinction,
circumburst absorption, Ly-alpha blanketing and absorption due to high
redshift, low density environments, rapid temporal decay, and intrinsic
weakness of the reverse shock. Of these, foreground extinction, circumburst
absorption, and high redshift provide the best explanations for most of the
non-detections in our sample. There is tentative evidence of suppression of the
strong reverse shock emission. This could be because of a
Poynting-flux-dominated flow or a pure non-relativistic hydrodynamical reverse
shock.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511132 [pdf] - 77490
Prompt optical observations of GRB050319 with the Swift UVOT
Mason, K. O.;
Blustin, A. J.;
Boyd, P.;
Holland, S. T.;
Page, M. J.;
Roming, P.;
Still, M.;
Zhang, B.;
Breeveld, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gronwall, C.;
Hunsberger, S.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
Landsman, W.;
McGowan, K.;
Nousek, J.;
Poole, T.;
Rhoads, J.;
Rosen, S.;
Schady, P.
Submitted: 2005-11-04
The UVOT telescope on the Swift observatory has detected optical afterglow
emission from GRB 050319. The flux declines with a power law slope of alpha =
-0.57 between the start of observations some 230 seconds after the burst onset
(90s after the burst trigger) until it faded below the sensitivity threshold of
the instrument after ~5 x 10^4s. There is no evidence for the rapidly declining
component in the early light curve that is seen at the same time in the X-ray
band. The afterglow is not detected in UVOT shortward of the B-band, suggesting
a redshift of about 3.5. The optical V-band emission lies on the extension of
the X-ray spectrum, with an optical to X-ray slope of beta = -0.8. The
relatively flat decay rate of the burst suggests that the central engine
continues to inject energy into the fireball for as long as a few x 10^4s after
the burst.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509060 [pdf] - 133723
Swift-UVOT detection of GRB 050318
Still, M.;
Roming, P. W. A.;
Mason, K. O.;
Blustin, A.;
Boyd, P.;
Breeveld, A.;
Brown, P.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gronwall, C.;
Holland, S. T.;
Hunsberger, S.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
James, C.;
Landsman, W.;
McGowan, K.;
Morgan, A.;
Poole, T.;
Rosen, S.;
Schady, P.;
Zhang, B.;
Krimm, H.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Giommi, P.;
Goad, M. R.;
Mangano, V.;
Page, K.;
Perri, M.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Gehrels, N.;
Nousek, J.
Submitted: 2005-09-02
We present observations of GRB 050318 by the Ultra-Violet and Optical
Telescope (UVOT) on-board the Swift observatory. The data are the first
detections of a Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) afterglow decay by the UVOT instrument,
launched specifically to open a new window on these transient sources. We
showcase UVOTs ability to provide multi-color photometry and the advantages of
combining UVOT data with simultaneous and contemporaneous observations from the
high-energy detectors on the Swift spacecraft. Multiple filters covering
1,800-6,000 Angstroms reveal a red source with spectral slope steeper than the
simultaneous X-ray continuum. Spectral fits indicate that the UVOT colors are
consistent with dust extinction by systems at z = 1.2037 and z = 1.4436,
redshifts where absorption systems have been pre-identified. However, the data
can be most-easily reproduced with models containing a foreground system of
neutral gas redshifted by z = 2.8 +/- 0.3. For both of the above scenarios,
spectral and decay slopes are, for the most part, consistent with fireball
expansion into a uniform medium, provided a cooling break occurs between the
energy ranges of the UVOT and Swifts X-ray instrumentation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507413 [pdf] - 386220
The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope
Roming, P. W. A.;
Kennedy, T. E.;
Mason, K. O.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Ahr, L.;
Bingham, R. E.;
Broos, P. S.;
Carter, M. J.;
Hancock, B. K.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hunsberger, S. D.;
Kawakami, H.;
Killough, R.;
Koch, T. S.;
McLelland, M. K.;
Smith, K.;
Smith, P. J.;
Soto, J. C.;
Boyd, P. T.;
Breeveld, A. A.;
Holland, S. T.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
Pryzby, M. S.;
Still, M. D.;
Stock, J.
Submitted: 2005-07-18
The UV/Optical Telescope (UVOT) is one of three instruments flying aboard the
Swift Gamma-ray Observatory. It is designed to capture the early (approximately
1 minute) UV and optical photons from the afterglow of gamma-ray bursts in the
170-600 nm band as well as long term observations of these afterglows. This is
accomplished through the use of UV and optical broadband filters and grisms.
The UVOT has a modified Ritchey-Chretien design with micro-channel plate
intensified charged-coupled device detectors that record the arrival time of
individual photons and provide sub-arcsecond positioning of sources. We discuss
some of the science to be pursued by the UVOT and the overall design of the
instrument.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0506029 [pdf] - 133716
Ultraviolet, Optical, and X-Ray Observations of the Type Ia Supernova
2005am with Swift
Brown, P. J.;
Holland, S. T.;
James, C.;
Milne, P.;
Roming, P. W. A.;
Mason, K. O.;
Page, K. L.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Burrows, D.;
Morgan, A.;
Gronwall, C.;
Blustin, A. J.;
Boyd, P.;
Still, M.;
Breeveld, A.;
de Pasquale, M.;
Hunsberger, S.;
Ivanushkina, M.;
Landsman, W.;
McGowan, K.;
Poole, T.;
Rosen, S.;
Schady, P.;
Gehrels, N.
Submitted: 2005-06-01
We present ultraviolet and optical light curves in six broadband filters and
grism spectra obtained by Swift's Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope for the Type Ia
supernova SN2005am. The data were collected beginning about four days before
the B-band maximum, with excellent coverage of the rapid decline phase and
later observations extending out to 69 days after the peak. The optical and
near UV light curve match well those of SN1992A. The other UV observations
constitute the first set of light curves shorter than 2500 Angstroms and allow
us to compare the light curve evolution in three UV bands. The UV behavior of
this and other low redshift supernovae can be used to constrain theories of
progenitor evolution or to interpret optical light curves of high redshift
supernovae. Using Swift's X-Ray Telescope, we also report the upper limit to
SN2005am's X-ray luminosity to be 1.77 x 10^40 erg s^-1 in the 0.3--10 keV
range from 58,117 s of exposure time.