sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Ibison, M.

Normalized to: Ibison, M.

3 article(s) in total. 7 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 3,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1208.2542  [pdf] - 1968373
Observational constraints on conformal time symmetry, missing matter and double dark energy
Comments: Revised version emphasising a different version of the underlying symmetry, as published in JCAP
Submitted: 2012-08-13, last modified: 2019-09-25
The current concordance model of cosmology is dominated by two mysterious ingredients: dark matter and dark energy. In this paper, we explore the possibility that, in fact, there exist two dark-energy components: the cosmological constant $\Lambda$, with equation-of-state parameter $w_\Lambda=-1$, and a `missing matter' component $X$ with $w_X=-2/3$, which we introduce here to allow the evolution of the universal scale factor as a function of conformal time to exhibit a symmetry that relates the big bang to the future conformal singularity, such as in Penrose's conformal cyclic cosmology. Using recent cosmological observations, we constrain the present-day energy density of missing matter to be $\Omega_{X,0}=-0.034 \pm 0.075$. This is consistent with the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, but constraints on the energy densities of all the components are considerably broadened by the introduction of missing matter; significant relative probability exists even for $\Omega_{X,0} \sim 0.1$, and so the presence of a missing matter component cannot be ruled out. As a result, a Bayesian model selection analysis only slightly disfavours its introduction by 1.1 log-units of evidence. Foregoing our symmetry requirement on the conformal time evolution of the universe, we extend our analysis by allowing $w_X$ to be a free parameter. For this more generic `double dark energy' model, we find $w_X = -1.01 \pm 0.16$ and $\Omega_{X,0} = -0.10 \pm 0.56$, which is again consistent with the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, although once more the posterior distributions are sufficiently broad that the existence of a second dark-energy component cannot be ruled out. The model including the second dark energy component also has an equivalent Bayesian evidence to $\Lambda$CDM, within the estimation error, and is indistinguishable according to the Jeffreys guideline.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107316  [pdf] - 247854
Engineering the Zero-Point Field and Polarizable Vacuum For Interstellar Flight
Comments: Paper withdrawn. Author Ibison does not subscribe to some of the speculations in this document
Submitted: 2001-07-17, last modified: 2010-10-26
A theme that has come to the fore in advanced planning for long-range space exploration is the concept of "propellantless propulsion" or "field propulsion." One version of this concept involves the projected possibility that empty space itself (the quantum vacuum, or space-time metric) might be manipulated so as to provide energy/thrust for future space vehicles. Although such a proposal has a certain science-fiction quality about it, modern theory describes the vacuum as a polarizable medium that sustains energetic quantum fluctuations. Thus the possibility that matter/vacuum interactions might be engineered for space-flight applications is not a priori ruled out, although certain constraints need to be acknowledged. The structure and implications of such a far-reaching hypothesis are considered herein.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302273  [pdf] - 54900
Investigation of the polarizable vacuum cosmology
Comments: Extended to give prediction of binary pulsar decay through radiation. Fuller historical context established in introduction. Submitted to ApJ
Submitted: 2003-02-13, last modified: 2004-02-03
The basic cosmological predictions of a `polarizable-vacuum' theory of gravity due to Dicke, predating the scalar-tensor theory, are investigated and tested for their compliance with current observations. A Friedmann-like equation is derived for the theory that differs in a significant way from that of GR, for which it is demonstrated that a big bang is not a solution: the initial scale factor may be small but not zero, and must have zero first derivative. Detailed graphs of the predictions of the theory for combinations of the density parameters are given. It is shown that these predictions are compatible with current estimates for the age and deceleration parameter, and the maximum observable redshift, provided the matter density $\Omega_m$ is close to the luminous matter density, i.e. provided there is not a significant amount of missing mass. For these best fit parameters, the theory predicts a maximum initial temperature that is too small for BBN and probably too small to support an era of radiation domination. The theory predicts a radiation power from a binary system that is 2/3 that predicted by GR, and so incompatible with observed orbital decay rate of PSR 1913 + 16. There is some discussion of possible developments, including reconciliation through accommodation of vacuum anisotropy, and of the relation between PV and the Yilmaz theory and the quasi-steady-state cosmology.