Normalized to: Ibison, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.2542 [pdf] - 1968373
Observational constraints on conformal time symmetry, missing matter and
double dark energy
Submitted: 2012-08-13, last modified: 2019-09-25
The current concordance model of cosmology is dominated by two mysterious
ingredients: dark matter and dark energy. In this paper, we explore the
possibility that, in fact, there exist two dark-energy components: the
cosmological constant $\Lambda$, with equation-of-state parameter
$w_\Lambda=-1$, and a `missing matter' component $X$ with $w_X=-2/3$, which we
introduce here to allow the evolution of the universal scale factor as a
function of conformal time to exhibit a symmetry that relates the big bang to
the future conformal singularity, such as in Penrose's conformal cyclic
cosmology. Using recent cosmological observations, we constrain the present-day
energy density of missing matter to be $\Omega_{X,0}=-0.034 \pm 0.075$. This is
consistent with the standard $\Lambda$CDM model, but constraints on the energy
densities of all the components are considerably broadened by the introduction
of missing matter; significant relative probability exists even for
$\Omega_{X,0} \sim 0.1$, and so the presence of a missing matter component
cannot be ruled out. As a result, a Bayesian model selection analysis only
slightly disfavours its introduction by 1.1 log-units of evidence. Foregoing
our symmetry requirement on the conformal time evolution of the universe, we
extend our analysis by allowing $w_X$ to be a free parameter. For this more
generic `double dark energy' model, we find $w_X = -1.01 \pm 0.16$ and
$\Omega_{X,0} = -0.10 \pm 0.56$, which is again consistent with the standard
$\Lambda$CDM model, although once more the posterior distributions are
sufficiently broad that the existence of a second dark-energy component cannot
be ruled out. The model including the second dark energy component also has an
equivalent Bayesian evidence to $\Lambda$CDM, within the estimation error, and
is indistinguishable according to the Jeffreys guideline.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107316 [pdf] - 247854
Engineering the Zero-Point Field and Polarizable Vacuum For Interstellar
Flight
Submitted: 2001-07-17, last modified: 2010-10-26
A theme that has come to the fore in advanced planning for long-range space
exploration is the concept of "propellantless propulsion" or "field
propulsion." One version of this concept involves the projected possibility
that empty space itself (the quantum vacuum, or space-time metric) might be
manipulated so as to provide energy/thrust for future space vehicles. Although
such a proposal has a certain science-fiction quality about it, modern theory
describes the vacuum as a polarizable medium that sustains energetic quantum
fluctuations. Thus the possibility that matter/vacuum interactions might be
engineered for space-flight applications is not a priori ruled out, although
certain constraints need to be acknowledged. The structure and implications of
such a far-reaching hypothesis are considered herein.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0302273 [pdf] - 54900
Investigation of the polarizable vacuum cosmology
Submitted: 2003-02-13, last modified: 2004-02-03
The basic cosmological predictions of a `polarizable-vacuum' theory of
gravity due to Dicke, predating the scalar-tensor theory, are investigated and
tested for their compliance with current observations. A Friedmann-like
equation is derived for the theory that differs in a significant way from that
of GR, for which it is demonstrated that a big bang is not a solution: the
initial scale factor may be small but not zero, and must have zero first
derivative. Detailed graphs of the predictions of the theory for combinations
of the density parameters are given. It is shown that these predictions are
compatible with current estimates for the age and deceleration parameter, and
the maximum observable redshift, provided the matter density $\Omega_m$ is
close to the luminous matter density, i.e. provided there is not a significant
amount of missing mass. For these best fit parameters, the theory predicts a
maximum initial temperature that is too small for BBN and probably too small to
support an era of radiation domination. The theory predicts a radiation power
from a binary system that is 2/3 that predicted by GR, and so incompatible with
observed orbital decay rate of PSR 1913 + 16. There is some discussion of
possible developments, including reconciliation through accommodation of vacuum
anisotropy, and of the relation between PV and the Yilmaz theory and the
quasi-steady-state cosmology.