Normalized to: Huettig, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.02707 [pdf] - 1274616
Gravitational slopes, geomorphology, and material strengths of the
nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from OSIRIS observations
Groussin, O.;
Jorda, L.;
Auger, A. -T.;
Kührt, E.;
Gaskell, R.;
Capanna, C.;
Scholten, F.;
Preusker, F.;
Lamy, P.;
Hviid, S.;
Knollenberg, J.;
Keller, U.;
Huettig, C.;
Sierks, H.;
Barbieri, C.;
Rodrigo, R.;
Koschny, D.;
Rickman, H.;
Hearn, M. F. A;
Agarwal, J.;
Barucci, M. A.;
Bertaux, J. -L.;
Bertini, I.;
Boudreault, S.;
Cremonese, G.;
Da Deppo, V.;
Davidsson, B.;
Debei, S.;
De Cecco, M.;
El-Maarry, M. R.;
Fornasier, S.;
Fulle, M.;
Gutiérrez, P. J.;
Güttler, C.;
Ip, W. -H;
Kramm, J. -R.;
Küppers, M.;
Lazzarin, M.;
Lara, L. M.;
Moreno, J. J. Lopez;
Marchi, S.;
Marzari, F.;
Massironi, M.;
Michalik, H.;
Naletto, G.;
Oklay, N.;
Pommerol, A.;
Pajola, M.;
Thomas, N.;
Toth, I.;
Tubiana, C.;
Vincent, J. -B.
Submitted: 2015-09-09
We study the link between gravitational slopes and the surface morphology on
the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and provide constraints on the
mechanical properties of the cometary material. We computed the gravitational
slopes for five regions on the nucleus that are representative of the different
morphologies observed on the surface, using two shape models computed from
OSIRIS images by the stereo-photoclinometry (SPC) and stereo-photogrammetry
(SPG) techniques. We estimated the tensile, shear, and compressive strengths
using different surface morphologies and mechanical considerations. The
different regions show a similar general pattern in terms of the relation
between gravitational slopes and terrain morphology: i) low-slope terrains
(0-20 deg) are covered by a fine material and contain a few large ($>$10 m) and
isolated boulders, ii) intermediate-slope terrains (20-45 deg) are mainly
fallen consolidated materials and debris fields, with numerous
intermediate-size boulders from $<$1 m to 10 m for the majority of them, and
iii) high-slope terrains (45-90 deg) are cliffs that expose a consolidated
material and do not show boulders or fine materials. The best range for the
tensile strength of overhangs is 3-15 Pa (upper limit of 150 Pa), 4-30 Pa for
the shear strength of fine surface materials and boulders, and 30-150 Pa for
the compressive strength of overhangs (upper limit of 1500 Pa). The
strength-to-gravity ratio is similar for 67P and weak rocks on Earth. As a
result of the low compressive strength, the interior of the nucleus may have
been compressed sufficiently to initiate diagenesis, which could have
contributed to the formation of layers. Our value for the tensile strength is
comparable to that of dust aggregates formed by gravitational instability and
tends to favor a formation of comets by the accrection of pebbles at low
velocities.