Normalized to: Hue, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.05415 [pdf] - 2131991
18-year long monitoring of the evolution of H2O vapor in the
stratosphere of Jupiter with the Odin space telescope
Benmahi, B.;
Cavalié, T.;
Dobrijevic, M.;
Biver, N.;
Bermudez-Diaz, K.;
Sandqvist, Aa.;
Lellouch, E.;
Moreno, R.;
Fouchet, T.;
Hue, V.;
Hartogh, P.;
Billebaud, F.;
Lecacheux, A.;
Hjalmarson, Å.;
Frisk, U.;
Olberg, M.;
Team, andThe Odin
Submitted: 2020-07-10
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacted Jupiter in July 1994, leaving its
stratosphere with several new species, among them water vapor (H2O). With the
aid of a photochemical model H2O can be used as a dynamical tracer in the
jovian stratosphere. In this paper, we aim at constraining vertical eddy
diffusion (Kzz) at the levels where H2O resides. We monitored the H2O
disk-averaged emission at 556.936 GHz with the Odin space telescope between
2002 and 2019, covering nearly two decades. We analyzed the data with a
combination of 1D photochemical and radiative transfer models to constrain
vertical eddy diffusion in the stratosphere of Jupiter. The Odin observations
show us that the emission of H2O has an almost linear decrease of about 40%
between 2002 and 2019.We can only reproduce our time series if we increase the
magnitude of Kzz in the pressure range where H2O diffuses downward from 2002 to
2019, i.e. from ~0.2 mbar to ~5 mbar. However, this modified Kzz is
incompatible with hydrocarbon observations. We find that, even if allowance is
made for the initially large abundances of H2O and CO at the impact latitudes,
the photochemical conversion of H2O to CO2 is not sufficient to explain the
progressive decline of the H2O line emission, suggestive of additional loss
mechanisms. The Kzz we derived from the Odin observations of H2O can only be
viewed as an upper limit in the ~0.2 mbar to ~5 mbar pressure range. The
incompatibility between the interpretations made from H2O and hydrocarbon
observations probably results from 1D modeling limitations. Meridional
variability of H2O, most probably at auroral latitudes, would need to be
assessed and compared with that of hydrocarbons to quantify the role of auroral
chemistry in the temporal evolution of the H2O abundance since the SL9 impacts.
Modeling the temporal evolution of SL9 species with a 2D model would be the
next natural step.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.13987 [pdf] - 2101498
The deep composition of Uranus and Neptune from in situ exploration and
thermochemical modeling
Cavalié, Thibault;
Venot, Olivia;
Miguel, Yamila;
Fletcher, Leigh N.;
Wurz, Peter;
Mousis, Olivier;
Bounaceur, Roda;
Hue, Vincent;
Leconte, Jérémy;
Dobrijevic, Michel
Submitted: 2020-04-29
The distant ice giants of the Solar System, Uranus and Neptune, have only
been visited by one space mission, Voyager 2. The current knowledge on their
composition remains very limited despite some recent advances. A better
characterization of their composition is however essential to constrain their
formation and evolution, as a significant fraction of their mass is made of
heavy elements, contrary to the gas giants Jupiter and Saturn. An in situ probe
like Galileo would provide us with invaluable direct ground-truth composition
measurements. However, some of the condensibles will remain out of the grasp of
a shallow probe. While additional constraints could be obtained from a
complementary orbiter, thermochemistry and diffusion modeling can further help
us to increase the science return of an in situ probe.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.07399 [pdf] - 1971379
Herschel map of Saturn's stratospheric water, delivered by the plumes of
Enceladus
Cavalié, T.;
Hue, V.;
Hartogh, P.;
Moreno, R.;
Lellouch, E.;
Feuchtgruber, H.;
Jarchow, C.;
Cassidy, T.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Billebaud, F.;
Dobrijevic, M.;
Rezac, L.;
Orton, G. S.;
Rengel, M.;
Fouchet, T.;
Guerlet, S.
Submitted: 2019-08-20
Context. The origin of water in the stratospheres of Giant Planets has been
an outstanding question ever since its first detection by ISO some 20 years
ago. Water can originate from interplanetary dust particles, icy rings and
satellites and large comet impacts. Analysis of Herschel Space Observatory
observations have proven that the bulk of Jupiter's stratospheric water was
delivered by the Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts in 1994. In 2006, the Cassini mission
detected water plumes at the South Pole of Enceladus, placing the moon as a
serious candidate for Saturn's stratospheric water. Further evidence was found
in 2011, when Herschel demonstrated the presence of a water torus at the
orbital distance of Enceladus, fed by the moon's plumes. Finally, water falling
from the rings onto Saturn's uppermost atmospheric layers at low latitudes was
detected during the final orbits of Cassini's end-of-mission plunge into the
atmosphere. Aims. In this paper, we use Herschel mapping observations of water
in Saturn's stratosphere to identify its source. Methods. Several empirical
models are tested against the Herschel-HIFI and -PACS observations, which were
collected on December 30, 2010, and January 2nd, 2011 (respectively). Results.
We demonstrate that Saturn's stratospheric water is not uniformly mixed as a
function of latitude, but peaking at the equator and decreasing poleward with a
Gaussian distribution. We obtain our best fit with an equatorial mole fraction
1.1 ppb and a half-width at half-maximum of 25{\deg}, when accounting for a
temperature increase in the two warm stratospheric vortices produced by
Saturn's Great Storm of 2010-2011. Conclusions. This work demonstrates that
Enceladus is the main source of Saturn's stratospheric water.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.10338 [pdf] - 1657720
Seasonal stratospheric photochemistry on Uranus and Neptune
Submitted: 2018-03-27
A time-variable 1D photochemical model is used to study the distribution of
stratospheric hydrocarbons as a function of altitude, latitude, and season on
Uranus and Neptune. The results for Neptune indicate that in the absence of
stratospheric circulation or other meridional transport processes, the
hydrocarbon abundances exhibit strong seasonal and meridional variations in the
upper stratosphere, but that these variations become increasingly damped with
depth due to increasing dynamical and chemical time scales. At high altitudes,
hydrocarbon mixing ratios are typically largest where the solar insolation is
the greatest, leading to strong hemispheric dichotomies between the
summer-to-fall hemisphere and winter-to-spring hemisphere. At mbar pressures
and deeper, slower chemistry and diffusion lead to latitude variations that
become more symmetric about the equator. On Uranus, the stagnant, poorly mixed
stratosphere confines methane and its photochemical products to higher
pressures, where chemistry and diffusion time scales remain large. Seasonal
variations in hydrocarbons are therefore predicted to be more muted on Uranus,
despite the planet's very large obliquity. Radiative-transfer simulations
demonstrate that latitude variations in hydrocarbons on both planets are
potentially observable with future JWST mid-infrared spectral imaging. Our
seasonal model predictions for Neptune compare well with retrieved C2H2 and
C2H6 abundances from spatially resolved ground-based observations (no such
observations currently exist for Uranus), suggesting that stratospheric
circulation -- which was not included in these models -- may have little
influence on the large-scale meridional hydrocarbon distributions on Neptune,
unlike the situation on Jupiter and Saturn.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.08697 [pdf] - 1648936
Photochemistry, mixing and transport in Jupiter's stratosphere
constrained by Cassini
Submitted: 2018-02-23
We aim at constraining the diffusive and advective transport processes in
Jupiter's stratosphere. The IR spectrum recorded by Cassini/CIRS during the
Jupiter flyby contains the fingerprints of several atmospheric compounds and
allows probing its atmospheric composition. C2H2 and C2H6, the main compounds
produced by methane photochemistry, were retrieved as a function of latitude at
certain pressure levels. CIRS observations suggest a different meridional
distribution for these two species, difficult to reconcile with their
photochemical histories, which are thought to be coupled to the methane
photolysis. While the C2H2 abundance decreases with latitude, C2H6 becomes more
abundant at high latitudes. A new 2D (latitude-altitude) seasonal photochemical
model is developed to study whether the addition of stratospheric transport
processes, such as meridional diffusion and advection, can explain the
latitudinal behavior of C2H2 and C2H6. C2H2 observations are fairly well
reproduced without meridional diffusion. Adding meridional diffusion to the
model provides an improved agreement with the C2H6 observations by flattening
its meridional distribution, but degrades the fit to the C2H2 distribution.
Meridional diffusion alone cannot produce the observed increase with latitude
of C2H6. When adding advective transport between 30 mbar and 0.01 mbar, with
upwelling winds at the equator and downwelling winds at high latitudes, we can
reproduce the C2H6 abundance increase with latitude. However, the fit to the
C2H2 distribution is degraded. The strength of the advective winds needed to
reproduce the C2H6 abundances is very sensitive to the value of the meridional
eddy diffusion coefficient. The coupled fate of C2H2 and C2H6 suggests that an
additional process is missing in the model. Ion-neutral chemistry was not
accounted for in this work and might be a good candidate to solve this issue.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.00235 [pdf] - 1693913
Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations
Mousis, O.;
Atkinson, D. H.;
Cavalié, T.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Amato, M. J.;
Aslam, S.;
Ferri, F.;
Renard, J. -B.;
Spilker, T.;
Venkatapathy, E.;
Wurz, P.;
Aplin, K.;
Coustenis, A.;
Deleuil, M.;
Dobrijevic, M.;
Fouchet, T.;
Guillot, T.;
Hartogh, P.;
Hewagama, T.;
Hofstadter, M. D.;
Hue, V.;
Hueso, R.;
Lebreton, J. -P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Moses, J.;
Orton, G. S.;
Pearl, J. C.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.;
Simon, A.;
Venot, O.;
Waite, J. H.;
Achterberg, R. K.;
Atreya, S.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blanc, M.;
Borget, F.;
Brugger, B.;
Charnoz, S.;
Chiavassa, T.;
Cottini, V.;
d'Hendecourt, L.;
Danger, G.;
Encrenaz, T.;
Gorius, N. J. P.;
Jorda, L.;
Marty, B.;
Moreno, R.;
Morse, A.;
Nixon, C.;
Reh, K.;
Ronnet, T.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Sheridan, S.;
Sotin, C.;
Vernazza, P.;
Villanueva, G. L.
Submitted: 2017-08-01
The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the least understood class of planets
in our solar system but the most frequently observed type of exoplanets.
Presumed to have a small rocky core, a deep interior comprising ~70% heavy
elements surrounded by a more dilute outer envelope of H2 and He, Uranus and
Neptune are fundamentally different from the better-explored gas giants Jupiter
and Saturn. Because of the lack of dedicated exploration missions, our
knowledge of the composition and atmospheric processes of these distant worlds
is primarily derived from remote sensing from Earth-based observatories and
space telescopes. As a result, Uranus's and Neptune's physical and atmospheric
properties remain poorly constrained and their roles in the evolution of the
Solar System not well understood. Exploration of an ice giant system is
therefore a high-priority science objective as these systems (including the
magnetosphere, satellites, rings, atmosphere, and interior) challenge our
understanding of planetary formation and evolution. Here we describe the main
scientific goals to be addressed by a future in situ exploration of an ice
giant. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level, about 5 scale
heights beneath the tropopause, would yield insight into two broad themes: i)
the formation history of the ice giants and, in a broader extent, that of the
Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe
would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics,
with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay
station. In addition, possible mission concepts and partnerships are presented,
and a strawman ice-giant probe payload is described. An ice-giant atmospheric
probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to a future NASA ice-giant
flagship mission.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.02724 [pdf] - 1359038
2D photochemical modeling of Saturn's stratosphere. Part II: Feedback
between composition and temperature
Submitted: 2015-12-08
Saturn's axial tilt produces seasons in a similar way as on Earth. Both the
stratospheric temperature and composition are affected by this latitudinally
varying insolation along the seasons. The thermal structure is controlled and
regulated by the amount of hydrocarbons in the stratosphere, which act as
absorbers and coolants from the UV to the far-IR spectral range, and this
structure influences the amount of hydrocarbons. We study here the feedback
between the chemical composition and the thermal structure by coupling a
latitudinal and seasonal photochemical model with a radiative seasonal model.
Our results show that the seasonal temperature peak in the higher stratosphere,
associated with the seasonal increase of insolation, is shifted earlier than
the maximum insolation peak. This shift is increased with increasing latitudes
and is caused by the low amount of stratospheric coolants in the spring season.
At 80$^{\circ}$ in both hemispheres, the temperature peak at 1d-2mbar is seen
to occur half a season earlier than was previously predicted by radiative
seasonal models that assumed spatially and temporally uniform distribution of
coolants. This shift progressively decreases with increasing pressure, up to
around the 0.5mbar pressure level where it vanishes. However, the thermal field
has a small feedback on the abundance distributions. This feedback modifies the
predicted equator-to-pole temperature gradient. The meridional gradients of
temperature at the mbar pressure levels are better reproduced when this
feedback is accounted for. At lower pressure levels, the thermal structure
seems to depart from pure radiative seasonal equilibrium as previously
suggested by Guerlet et al. (2014). Although the agreement with the absolute
value of the stratospheric temperature observed by Cassini is moderate, it is a
mandatory step toward a fully coupled GCM-photochemical model.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.02326 [pdf] - 1095673
2D photochemical modeling of Saturn's stratosphere. Part I: Seasonal
variation of atmospheric composition without meridional transport
Submitted: 2015-04-09
Saturn's axial tilt of 26.7{\deg} produces seasons in a similar way as on
Earth. Both the stratospheric temperature and composition are affected by this
latitudinally varying insolation along Saturn's orbital path. A new time
dependent 2D photochemical model is presented to study the seasonal evolution
of Saturn's stratospheric composition. This study focuses on the impact of the
seasonally variable thermal field on the main stratospheric C2 hydrocarbon
chemistry (C2H2 and C2H6) using a realistic radiative climate model. Meridional
mixing and advective processes are implemented in the model but turned off in
the present study for the sake of simplicity. The results are compared to a
simple study case where a latitudinally and temporally steady thermal field is
assumed. Our simulations suggest that, when the seasonally variable thermal
field is accounted for, the downward diffusion of the seasonally produced
hydrocarbons is faster due to the seasonal compression of the atmospheric
column during winter. This effect increases with increasing latitudes which
experience the most important thermal changes in the course of the seasons. The
seasonal variability of C2H2 and C2H6 therefore persists at higher-pressure
levels with a seasonally-variable thermal field. Cassini limb-observations of
C2H2 and C2H6 (Guerlet et al., 2009) are reasonably well-reproduced from the
equator to 40{\deg} in both hemispheres