Normalized to: Hubickyj, O.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0810.5186 [pdf] - 1424620
Models of Jupiter's Growth Incorporating Thermal and Hydrodynamic
Constraints
Submitted: 2008-10-28
[Abridged] We model the growth of Jupiter via core nucleated accretion,
applying constraints from hydrodynamical processes that result from the
disk-planet interaction. We compute the planet's internal structure using a
Henyey-type stellar evolution code. The planet's interactions with the
protoplanetary disk are calculated using 3-D hydrodynamic simulations. Previous
models of Jupiter's growth have taken the radius of the planet to be
approximately one Hill sphere radius, Rhill. However, 3-D hydrodynamic
simulations show that only gas within 0.25Rhill remains bound to the planet,
with the more distant gas eventually participating in the shear flow of the
protoplanetary disk. Therefore in our new simulations, the planet's outer
boundary is placed at the location where gas has the thermal energy to reach
the portion of the flow not bound to the planet. We find that the smaller
radius increases the time required for planetary growth by ~5%. Thermal
pressure limits the rate at which a planet less than a few dozen times as
massive as Earth can accumulate gas from the protoplanetary disk, whereas
hydrodynamics regulates the growth rate for more massive planets. Within a
moderately viscous disk, the accretion rate peaks when the planet's mass is
about equal to the mass of Saturn. In a less viscous disk hydrodynamical limits
to accretion are smaller, and the accretion rate peaks at lower mass. To
account for disk dissipation, we perform some of our simulations of Jupiter's
growth within a disk whose surface gas density decreases on a timescale of
3Myr. According to our simulations, proto-Jupiter's distended and
thermally-supported envelope was too small to capture the planet's current
retinue of irregular satellites as advocated by Pollack et al. (1979).
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609739 [pdf] - 85331
On the Luminosity of Young Jupiters
Submitted: 2006-09-27
Traditional thermal evolution models of giant planets employ arbitrary
initial conditions selected more for computational expediency than physical
accuracy. Since the initial conditions are eventually forgotten by the evolving
planet, this approach is valid for mature planets, if not young ones. To
explore the evolution at young ages of jovian mass planets we have employed
model planets created by one implementation of the core accretion mechanism as
initial conditions for evolutionary calculations. We find that young jovian
planets are smaller, cooler, and several to 100 times less luminous than
predicted by earlier models. Furthermore the time interval during which the
young jupiters are fainter than expected depends on the mass of planet. Jupiter
mass planets (1 M_J) align with the conventional model luminosity in as little
at 20 million years, but 10 M_J planets can take up to 1 billion years to match
commonly cited luminosities, given our implementation of the core accretion
mechanism. If our assumptions, especially including our treatment of the
accretion shock, are correct, then young jovian planets are substantially
fainter at young ages than currently believed. These results have important
consequences both for detection strategies and for assigning masses to young
jovian planets based on observed luminosities.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0510009 [pdf] - 1468932
Young Jupiters are Faint: New Models of the Early Evolution of Giant
Planets
Submitted: 2005-09-30
Here we show preliminary calculations of the cooling and contraction of a 2
MJ planet. These calculations, which are being extended to 1-10 MJ, differ from
other published "cooling tracks" in that they include a core accretion-gas
capture formation scenario, the leading theory for the formation of gas giant
planets. We find that the initial post-accretionary intrinsic luminosity of the
planet is ~3 times less than previously published models which use arbitrary
initial conditions. These differences last a few tens of millions of years.
Young giant planets are intrinsically fainter than has been previously
appreciated. We also discuss how uncertainties in atmospheric chemistry and the
duration of the formation time of giant planets lead to challenges in deriving
planetary physical properties from comparison with tabulated model values.