Normalized to: Howes, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0607363 [pdf] - 83566
The Rise Time of Type Ia Supernovae from the Supernova Legacy Survey
Conley, A.;
Howell, D. A.;
Howes, A.;
Sullivan, M.;
Astier, P.;
Balam, D.;
Basa, S.;
Carlberg, R. G.;
Fouchez, D.;
Guy, J.;
Hook, I.;
Neill, J. D.;
Pain, R.;
Perrett, K.;
Pritchet, C. J.;
Regnault, N.;
Rich, J.;
Taillet, R.;
Aubourg, E.;
Bronder, J.;
Ellis, R. S.;
Fabbro, S.;
Filiol, M.;
Borgne, D. Le;
Palanque-Delabrouille, N.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Ripoche, P.
Submitted: 2006-07-16, last modified: 2006-09-20
We compare the rise times of nearby and distant Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia)
as a test for evolution using 73 high-redshift spectroscopically-confirmed SNe
Ia from the first two years of the five year Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) and
published observations of nearby SN. Because of the ``rolling'' search nature
of the SNLS, our measurement is approximately 6 times more precise than
previous studies, allowing for a more sensitive test of evolution between
nearby and distant supernovae. Adopting a simple $t^2$ early-time model (as in
previous studies), we find that the rest-frame $B$ rise times for a fiducial SN
Ia at high and low redshift are consistent, with values
$19.10^{+0.18}_{-0.17}({stat}) \pm 0.2 ({syst})$ and $19.58^{+0.22}_{-0.19}$
days, respectively; the statistical significance of this difference is only 1.4
\sg . The errors represent the uncertainty in the mean rather than any
variation between individual SN. We also compare subsets of our high-redshift
data set based on decline rate, host galaxy star formation rate, and redshift,
finding no substantive evidence for any subsample dependence.