Normalized to: Holz, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.14961 [pdf] - 2122762
A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the
LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave compact object merger GW190814 and Dark Energy
Survey galaxies
Palmese, A.;
deVicente, J.;
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Annis, J.;
Hartley, W.;
Herner, K.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Crocce, M.;
Huterer, D.;
Hernandez, I. Magana;
Davis, T. M.;
Garcia, A.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kessler, R.;
Lahav, O.;
Morgan, R.;
Nicolaou, C.;
Conselice, C.;
Foley, R. J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wilkinson, R. D.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2020-06-25
We present a measurement of the Hubble constant $H_0$ using the gravitational
wave (GW) event GW190814, which resulted from the coalescence of a 23 $M_\odot$
black hole with a 2.6 $M_\odot$ compact object, as a standard siren. No
compelling electromagnetic counterpart with associated host galaxy has been
identified for this event, thus our analysis accounts for $\sim$ 2,700
potential host galaxies within a statistical framework. The redshift
information is obtained from the photometric redshift (photo-$z$) catalog from
the Dark Energy Survey. The luminosity distance is provided by the
gravitational wave sky map published by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration. Since
this GW event has the second-smallest sky localization area after GW170817,
GW190814 is likely to provide the best constraint on cosmology from a single
standard siren without identifying an electromagnetic counterpart. Our analysis
uses photo-$z$ probability distribution functions and corrects for photo-$z$
biases. We also reanalyze the binary-black hole GW170814 within this updated
framework. We explore how our findings impact the $H_0$ constraints from
GW170817, the only GW merger associated with a unique host galaxy, and
therefore the most powerful standard siren to date. From a combination of
GW190814, GW170814 and GW170817, our analysis yields $H_0 = 69.0^{+ 14}_{- 7.5
}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ (68% Highest Density Interval, HDI) for a prior in
$H_0$ uniform between $[20,140]~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$. The addition of
GW190814 and GW170814 to GW170817 improves the 68% HDI from GW170817 alone by
$\sim 12\%$, showing how well-localized mergers without counterparts can
provide a marginal contribution to standard siren measurements, provided that a
complete galaxy catalog is available at the location of the event.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.13178 [pdf] - 2120170
Does Matter Matter? Using the mass distribution to distinguish neutron
stars and black holes
Submitted: 2020-06-23
Gravitational-wave detectors have opened a new window through which we can
observe black holes (BH) and neutron stars (NS). Analyzing the 11 detections
from LIGO/Virgo's first gravitational-wave catalog, GWTC-1, we investigate
whether the power-law fit to the BH mass spectrum can also accommodate the
binary neutron star event GW170817, or whether we require an additional feature
in the power-law between the NS and BH populations. The presence and location
of a feature between NS and BH has implications for the nuclear equation of
state, supernova physics, and binary formation and evolution. We find that a
single power-law fit across the entire mass range is in mild tension with: (a)
the detection of one source in the BNS mass range ($\sim 1$--$2.5 \,M_\odot$),
(b) the absence of detections in the "mass-gap" range ($\sim 2.5$--$5
\,M_\odot$), and (c) the detection of 10 sources in the BBH mass range
($\gtrsim 5 \,M_\odot$). Instead, the data favor models with a feature between
NS and BH masses, including a mass gap (Bayes factor of 4.6) and a break in the
power-law, with a steeper slope at NS masses compared to BH masses (91\%
credibility). We estimate the merger rates of compact binaries based on our fit
to the global mass distribution, finding $\mathcal{R}_\mathrm{BNS} =
871^{+3015}_{-805} \ \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \ \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ and
$\mathcal{R}_\mathrm{BBH} = 47.5^{+57.9}_{-28.8} \ \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \
\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. We conclude that, even in the absence of any prior knowledge
of the difference between NSs and BHs, the gravitational-wave data alone
already suggests two distinct populations of compact objects.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07385 [pdf] - 2114306
Constraints on the Physical Properties of S190814bv through Simulations
based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey
Morgan, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Herner, K.;
Garcia, A.;
Palmese, A.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Kessler, R.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Sherman, T. G. Bachmann N.;
Allam, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bom, C. R.;
Brout, D.;
Butler, R. E.;
Butner, M.;
Cartier, R.;
Chen, H.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E.;
Davis, T. M.;
Doctor, Z.;
Farr, B.;
Figueiredo, A. L.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galarza, J. Y.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Malik, U.;
Mann, A. W.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martinez-Vazquez, C. E.;
Meza, N.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nicolaou, C.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Points, S.;
Quirola, J.;
Rodriguez, O.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wiesner, M.;
Wood, M. L.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Costanzi, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
On 14 August 2019, the LIGO and Virgo Collaborations alerted the astronomical
community of a high significance detection of gravitational waves and
classified the source as a neutron star - black hole (NSBH) merger, the first
event of its kind. In search of an optical counterpart, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) Gravitational Wave Search and Discovery Team performed the most thorough
and accurate analysis to date, targeting the entire 90 percent confidence level
localization area with Blanco/DECam 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 16 nights after the
merger was detected. Objects with varying brightness were detected by the DES
Search and Discovery Pipeline and we systematically reduced the list of
candidate counterparts through catalog matching, light curve properties,
host-galaxy photometric redshifts, SOAR spectroscopic follow-up observations,
and machine-learning-based photometric classification. All candidates were
rejected as counterparts to the merger. To quantify the sensitivity of our
search, we applied our selection criteria to simulations of supernovae and
kilonovae as they would appear in the DECam observations. Since there are no
explicit light curve models for NSBH mergers, we characterize our sensitivity
with binary NS models that are expected to have similar optical signatures as
NSBH mergers. We find that if a kilonova occurred during this merger,
configurations where the ejected matter is greater than 0.07 solar masses, has
lanthanide abundance less than $10^{-8.56}$, and has a velocity between $0.18c$
and $0.21c$ are disfavored at the $2\sigma$ level. Furthermore, we estimate
that our background reduction methods are capable of associating gravitational
wave signals with a detected electromagnetic counterpart at the $4\sigma$ level
in $95\%$ of future follow-up observations.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.06050 [pdf] - 2113249
Cosmological Inference using Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens: A Mock
Data Challenge
Gray, Rachel;
Hernandez, Ignacio Magaña;
Qi, Hong;
Sur, Ankan;
Brady, Patrick R.;
Chen, Hsin-Yu;
Farr, Will M.;
Fishbach, Maya;
Gair, Jonathan R.;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Holz, Daniel E.;
Mastrogiovanni, Simone;
Messenger, Christopher;
Steer, Danièle A.;
Veitch, John
Submitted: 2019-08-16, last modified: 2020-06-12
The observation of binary neutron star merger GW170817, along with its
optical counterpart, provided the first constraint on the Hubble constant $H_0$
using gravitational wave standard sirens. When no counterpart is identified, a
galaxy catalog can be used to provide the necessary redshift information.
However, the true host might not be contained in a catalog which is not
complete out to the limit of gravitational-wave detectability. These
electromagnetic and gravitational-wave selection effects must be accounted for.
We describe and implement a method to estimate $H_0$ using both the counterpart
and the galaxy catalog standard siren methods. We perform a series of mock data
analyses using binary neutron star mergers to confirm our ability to recover an
unbiased estimate of $H_0$. Our simulations used a simplified universe with no
redshift uncertainties or galaxy clustering, but with different
magnitude-limited catalogs and assumed host galaxy properties, to test our
treatment of both selection effects. We explore how the incompleteness of
catalogs affects the final measurement of $H_0$, as well as the effect of
weighting each galaxy's likelihood of being a host by its luminosity. In our
most realistic simulation, where the simulated catalog is about three times
denser than the density of galaxies in the local universe, we find that a 4.4\%
measurement precision can be reached using galaxy catalogs with 50\%
completeness and $\sim 250$ binary neutron star detections with sensitivity
similar to that of Advanced LIGO's second observing run.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.02211 [pdf] - 2107413
Jumping the gap: searching for LIGO's biggest black holes
Submitted: 2020-05-29
Gravitational wave (GW) detections of binary black holes (BBHs) from the
first two observing runs of advanced LIGO and Virgo have shown evidence for a
maximum component black hole mass of $\lesssim50 M_\odot$. This is consistent
with expectations of a gap in the mass spectrum of black holes due to the
existence of pair-instability supernovae (PISN). This upper mass gap is
expected to exist in the range $\sim50M_\odot$-$120M_\odot$, beyond which a
population of intermediate mass black holes (IMBHs) may arise. We argue that
ground-based GW detectors are expected to be sensitive to BBHs with masses
above the mass gap. In the absence of detections, two years at upgraded
sensitivity (A+) would constrain the local merger rate of these "far side of
the PISN gap" black holes to be lower than
$0.01\,\text{yr}^{-1}\text{Gpc}^{-3}$. Alternatively, with a few tens of events
it may be possible to constrain the minimum IMBH mass to the percent level, if
the edge of the distribution is sufficiently sharp. These far side BBHs would
also be observed by future third generation detectors such as the Einstein
Telescope (ET) as well as space-based GW interferometers such as LISA, and may
dominate the fraction of multi-band events. We show that by comparing the
number of detections observed from ground and space it is possible to constrain
the merger rate history. Moreover, we find that the location of the high end of
the PISN mass gap leaves an imprint on the spectral shape of the stochastic
background of unresolved binaries, and that this may be accessible with A+
sensitivity. Finally, we show that by exploiting the upper edge of the gap,
these high-mass BBHs can be used as GW standard sirens to constrain the cosmic
expansion at redshifts of $\sim0.4$, $0.8$, and $1.5$ with LISA, LIGO, and ET,
respectively. These far-side black holes would be the most massive black holes
LIGO could detect.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.12152 [pdf] - 2119917
Shouts and Murmurs: Combining Individual Gravitational-Wave Sources with
the Stochastic Background to Measure the History of Binary Black Hole Mergers
Submitted: 2020-03-26, last modified: 2020-05-25
One of the goals of gravitational-wave astronomy is to quantify the evolution
of the compact binary merger rate with redshift. The redshift distribution of
black hole mergers would offer considerable information about their
evolutionary history, including their progenitor formation rate, the dependence
of black hole formation on stellar metallicity, and the time delay distribution
between formation and merger. Efforts to measure the binary redshift
distribution are currently limited, however, by the detection range of existing
instruments, which can individually resolve compact binary merger events only
out to $z\lesssim1$. We present a novel strategy with which to measure the
redshift distribution of binary black hole mergers well beyond the detection
range of current instruments. By synthesizing direct detections of individually
resolved mergers with \textit{indirect} searches for the stochastic
gravitational-wave background due to unresolved distant sources, we can glean
information about the peak redshift, $z_p$, at which the binary black hole
merger rate attains its maximum, even when this redshift is beyond the
detection horizon. Using data from Advanced LIGO and Virgo's first and second
observing runs, we employ this strategy to place joint constraints on $z_p$ and
the slope $\alpha$ with which the binary merger rate increases at low
redshifts, ruling out merger rates that grow faster than $\alpha \gtrsim 7$ and
peak beyond $z_p \gtrsim 1.5$. Looking ahead, we project that approximately one
year of observation with design-sensitivity Advanced LIGO will further break
remaining degeneracies, enabling a direct measurement of the peak redshift of
the binary black hole merger history.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.07744 [pdf] - 2086498
Direct Astrophysical Tests of Chiral Effective Field Theory at
Supranuclear Densities
Submitted: 2020-04-16, last modified: 2020-04-29
Recent observations of neutron stars with gravitational waves and X-ray
timing provide unprecedented access to the equation of state (EoS) of cold
dense matter at densities difficult to realize in terrestrial experiments. At
the same time, predictions for the EoS with reliable uncertainty estimates from
chiral effective field theory ($\chi$EFT) bound our theoretical ignorance. In
this work, we analyze astrophysical data using a nonparametric representation
of the neutron star EoS conditioned on $\chi$EFT to directly constrain the
underlying physical properties of the compact objects. We discuss how the data
alone constrain the EoS at high densities when we condition on $\chi$EFT at low
densities. We also demonstrate how to exploit astrophysical data to directly
test the predictions of $\chi$EFT for the EoS up to twice nuclear saturation
density, and estimate the density at which these predictions might break down.
We find that the existence of massive pulsars, gravitational waves from
GW170817, and NICER observations of PSR J0030+0451 favor $\chi$EFT predictions
for the EoS up to nuclear saturation density over a more agnostic analysis by a
factor of 7 for the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations used in this work.
While $\chi$EFT predictions using QMC are fully consistent with
gravitational-wave data up to twice nuclear saturation, NICER observations
suggest that the EoS stiffens relative to these predictions at nuclear
saturation density. Additionally, we marginalize over the uncertainty in the
density at which $\chi$EFT begins to break down, constraining the radius of a
$1.4\,M_\odot$ neutron star to $R_{1.4} = 11.40^{+1.38}_{-1.04}$
($12.54^{+0.71}_{-0.63}$) km and the pressure at twice nuclear saturation
density to $p(2n_\mathrm{sat}) = 14.2^{+18.1}_{-8.4}$ ($28.7^{+15.3}_{-15.0}$)
$\mathrm{MeV}/\mathrm{fm}^3$ with massive pulsar and gravitational-wave (and
NICER) data.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.11866 [pdf] - 2083540
Making GW190412: isolated formation of a 30+10 Msun binary black-hole
merger
Submitted: 2020-04-24
The LIGO/Virgo collaboration has reported the detection of GW190412, a black
hole-black hole (BH-BH) merger with the most unequal masses to date:
m_1=24.4--34.7 Msun and m_2=7.4--10.1 Msun, corresponding to a mass ratio of
q=0.21--0.41 (90 per cent probability range). Additionally, GW190412's
effective spin was estimated to be X_eff=0.14--0.34, with the spin of the
primary BH in the range a_spin=0.17--0.59. Based on this and prior detections,
>10 per cent of BH-BH mergers have q<0.4. Major BH-BH formation channels (i.e.,
dynamics in dense stellar systems, classical isolated binary evolution, or
chemically homogeneous evolution) tend to produce BH-BH mergers with comparable
masses (typically with q>0.5). Here we test whether the classical isolated
binary evolution channel can produce mergers resembling GW190412. We show that
our standard binary evolution scenario, with the typical assumptions on input
physics we have used in the past, produces such mergers. We provide an explicit
example of an unequal mass BH-BH merger, which forms at low metallicity
(Z=0.002) from two massive stars (77 and 35 Msun) and results in a BH-BH merger
with m_1=27.0 Msun, m_2=9.9 Msun (q=0.37), with primary black hole spin
a_spin=0.19 and an effective spin parameter X_eff=0.335. For this particular
model of the input physics the overall BH-BH merger rate density in the local
Universe (z=0) is: 73.5 Gpc^-3 yr^-1, while for systems with q<0.21, 0.28,
0.41, and 0.59 the rate density is: 0.01, 0.12, 6.8, and 22.2 Gpc^-3 yr^-1,
respectively. The results from our standard model are consistent with the
masses and spins of the black holes in GW190412, as well as with the LIGO/Virgo
estimate of the fraction of unequal-mass BH-BH mergers.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.04424 [pdf] - 2079962
Black Hole Coagulation: Modeling Hierarchical Mergers in Black Hole
Populations
Submitted: 2019-11-11, last modified: 2020-04-18
Data from the LIGO and Virgo detectors has confirmed that stellar-mass black
holes can merge within a Hubble time, leaving behind massive remnant black
holes. In some astrophysical environments such as globular clusters and AGN
disks, it may be possible for these remnants to take part in further
compact-object mergers, producing a population of hierarchically formed black
holes. In this work, we present a parameterized framework for describing the
population of binary black hole mergers, while self-consistently accounting for
hierarchical mergers. The framework casts black holes as particles in a box
which can collide based on an effective cross-section, but allows inputs from
more detailed astrophysical simulations. Our approach is relevant to any
population which is comprised of second or higher generation black holes, such
as primordial black holes or dense cluster environments. We describe some
possible inputs to this generic model and their effects on the black hole
merger populations, and use the model to perform Bayesian inference on the
catalog of black holes from LIGO and Virgo's first two observing runs. We find
that models with a high rate of hierarchical mergers are disfavored, consistent
with previous population analyses. Future gravitational-wave events will
further constrain the inputs to this generic hierarchical merger model,
enabling a deeper look into the formation environments of binary black holes.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.07053 [pdf] - 2084968
The evolutionary roads leading to low effective spins, high black hole
masses, and O1/O2 rates of LIGO/Virgo binary black holes
Belczynski, K.;
Klencki, J.;
Fields, C. E.;
Olejak, A.;
Berti, E.;
Meynet, G.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Holz, D. E.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Brown, D. A.;
Bulik, T.;
Leung, S. C.;
Nomoto, K.;
Madau, P.;
Hirschi, R.;
Kaiser, E.;
Jones, S.;
Mondal, S.;
Chruslinska, M.;
Drozda, P.;
Gerosa, D.;
Doctor, Z.;
Giersz, M.;
Ekstrom, S.;
Georgy, C.;
Askar, A.;
Baibhav, V.;
Wysocki, D.;
Natan, T.;
Farr, W. M.;
Wiktorowicz, G.;
Miller, M. Coleman;
Farr, B.;
Lasota, J. -P.
Submitted: 2017-06-21, last modified: 2020-03-06
All ten LIGO/Virgo binary black hole (BH-BH) coalescences reported from the
O1/O2 runs have near zero effective spins. There are only three potential
explanations of this fact. If the BH spin magnitudes are large then (i) either
both BH spin vectors must be nearly in the orbital plane or (ii) the spin
angular momenta of the BHs must be oppositely directed and similar in
magnitude. Or, (iii) the BH spin magnitudes are small. We test the third
hypothesis within the framework of the classical isolated binary evolution
scenario of the BH-BH merger formation. We test three models of angular
momentum transport in massive stars: a mildly efficient transport by meridional
currents (as employed in the Geneva code), an efficient transport by the
Tayler-Spruit magnetic dynamo (as implemented in the MESA code), and a
very-efficient transport (as proposed by Fuller et al.) to calculate natal BH
spins. We allow for binary evolution to increase the BH spins through accretion
and account for the potential spin-up of stars through tidal interactions.
Additionally, we update the calculations of the stellar-origin BH masses,
include revisions to the history of star formation and to the chemical
evolution across cosmic time. We find that we can match simultaneously the
observed BH-BH merger rate density, BH masses, and effective spins. Models with
efficient angular momentum transport are favored. The updated stellar-mass
weighted gas-phase metallicity evolution now used in our models appears to be a
key in better reproducing the LIGO/Virgo merger rate estimate. Mass losses
during the pair-instability pulsation supernova phase are likely overestimated
if the merger GW170729 hosts a BH more massive than 50 Msun. We also estimate
rate of BH-NS mergers from recent LIGO/Virgo observations. Our updated models
of BH-BH, BH-NS and NS-NS mergers are now publicly available at
www.syntheticuniverse.org.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12669 [pdf] - 2065166
Picky Partners: The Pairing of Component Masses in Binary Black Hole
Mergers
Submitted: 2019-05-29, last modified: 2020-02-04
We examine the relationship between individual black hole (BH) masses in
merging binary black hole (BBH) systems. Analyzing the ten BBH detections from
LIGO/Virgo's first two observing runs, we find that the masses of the component
BHs comprising each binary are unlikely to be randomly drawn from the same
underlying distribution. Instead, the two BHs of a given binary prefer to be of
comparable mass. We show that it is $\sim 5$ times more likely that the
component BHs in a given binary are always equal (to within 5\%) than that they
are randomly paired. If we assume that the probability of a merger between two
BHs scales with the mass ratio $q$ as $q^\beta$, so that $\beta=0$ corresponds
to random pairings, we find $\beta>0$ is favored at credibility 0.987. By
modeling the mass distribution, we find that the median mass ratio is $q_{50\%}
= 0.91^{+0.05}_{-0.17}$ at 90\% credibility. While the pairing between BHs
depends on their mass ratio, we find no evidence that it depends on the total
mass of the system: it is $\sim 6$ times more likely that the pairing depends
purely on the mass ratio than on the total mass. We predict that 99\% of BBHs
detected by LIGO/Virgo will have mass ratios $q > 0.5$. We conclude that
merging black holes do not form random pairings; instead they are selective
about their partners, preferring to mate with black holes of a similar mass.
The details of these selective pairings provide insight into the underlying
formation channels of merging binaries.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.06551 [pdf] - 2036338
Optical follow-up of gravitational wave triggers with DECam during the
first two LIGO/VIRGO observing runs
Herner, K.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Butler, R.;
Doctor, Z.;
Palmese, A.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Sobreira, F.;
Yanny, B.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Glaeser, N.;
Garcia, A.;
Sherman, N. F.;
Bechtol, K.;
Berger, E.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Cook, E.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen, E.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Sauseda, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carrasco-Kind, M.;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2020-01-17, last modified: 2020-01-22
Gravitational wave (GW) events detectable by LIGO and Virgo have several
possible progenitors, including black hole mergers, neutron star mergers, black
hole--neutron star mergers, supernovae, and cosmic string cusps. A subset of GW
events are expected to produce electromagnetic (EM) emission that, once
detected, will provide complementary information about their astrophysical
context. To that end, the LIGO--Virgo Collaboration (LVC) sends GW candidate
alerts to the astronomical community so that searches for their EM counterparts
can be pursued. The DESGW group, consisting of members of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES), the LVC, and other members of the astronomical community, uses
the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) to perform a search and discovery program for
optical signatures of LVC GW events. DESGW aims to use a sample of GW events as
standard sirens for cosmology. Due to the short decay timescale of the expected
EM counterparts and the need to quickly eliminate survey areas with no
counterpart candidates, it is critical to complete the initial analysis of each
night's images as quickly as possible. We discuss our search area
determination, imaging pipeline, and candidate selection processes. We review
results from the DESGW program during the first two LIGO--Virgo observing
campaigns and introduce other science applications that our pipeline enables.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.01025 [pdf] - 2028439
The binary-host connection: astrophysics of gravitational wave binaries
from their host galaxy properties
Submitted: 2020-01-03
Gravitational waves produced from the merger of binary neutron stars (BNSs)
are accompanied by electromagnetic counterparts, making it possible to identify
the associated host galaxy. We explore how properties of the host galaxies
relate to the astrophysical processes leading to the mergers. It is thought
that the BNS merger rate within a galaxy at a given epoch depends primarily on
the galaxy's star-formation history as well as the underlying merger time-delay
distribution of the binary systems. The stellar history of a galaxy, meanwhile,
depends on the cosmological evolution of the galaxy through time, and is tied
to the growth of structure in the Universe. We study the hosts of BNS mergers
in the context of structure formation by populating the Universe Machine
simulations with gravitational-wave events~ according to a simple time-delay
model. We find that different time-delay distributions predict different
properties of the associated host galaxies, including the distributions of
stellar mass, star-formation rate, halo mass, and local and large-scale
clustering of hosts. BNSs that merge today with short delay times prefer to be
in hosts that have high star-formation rates, while those with long delay times
live in dense regions within massive halos that have low star formation. We
show that with ${\mathcal O}(10)$ events from current gravitational-wave
detector networks, it is possible to make preliminary distinctions between
formation channels which trace stellar mass, halo mass, or star-formation rate.
We also find that strategies to follow up gravitational-wave events with
electromagnetic telescopes can be significantly optimized using the clustering
properties of their hosts.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.04906 [pdf] - 2109943
Counting on Short Gamma-Ray Bursts: Gravitational-Wave Constraints of
Jet Geometry
Submitted: 2019-12-10
The detection of GW170817 in gravitational waves and gamma rays revealed that
short gamma-ray bursts are associated with the merger of neutron-stars. Gamma
rays are thought to result from the formation of collimated jets, but the
details of this process continue to elude us. One fundamental observable is the
emission profile of the jet as a function of viewing angle. We present two
methods to measure the effective angular width, $\theta_B$, of short gamma-ray
burst (sGRB) jets using gravitational wave and gamma-ray data, assuming all
sGRBs have the same angular dependence for their luminosities. The first is a
counting experiment, where we combine the known detection thresholds of the
LIGO/Virgo and Fermi Gamma Ray Burst Monitor detectors to infer parameters of
systems that are detected in gravitational waves. This method requires minimal
knowledge about each event, beyond whether or not they were detected in
gamma-rays. The second method uses additional information from the
gravitational-wave and electromagnetic data to estimate parameters of the
source, and thereby improve constraints on jet properties. Applying our methods
to GW170817, we find only weak constraints on the sGRB luminosity profile, with
statistical uncertainty dominating differences between models. We also analyze
simulated events from future observing runs, and find that with 5 and 100 BNS
detections, the counting method constrains the relative uncertainty in
$\theta_B$ to within 51% and 12%, respectively. Incorporating
gravitational-wave parameter estimation would further tighten these constraints
to 43% and 9.6%. In the limit of many detections, incorporating parameter
estimation achieves only marginal improvements; we conclude that the majority
of the information about jet structure comes from the relative sensitivities of
gravitational-wave and gamma-ray detectors as encoded in simple counting
experiments.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.03119 [pdf] - 1999529
Upper Limits on Gravitational Waves from Scorpius X-1 from a Model-Based
Cross-Correlation Search in Advanced LIGO Data
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Afrough, M.;
Agarwal, B.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amato, A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Antier, S.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
AultONeal, K.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Bae, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bazzan, M.;
B'ecsy, B.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bode, N.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Canizares, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Carney, M. F.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatterjee, D.;
Chatziioannou, K.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, A. K. W.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cirelli, C. E.;
Cirone, A.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corban, P.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Corley, K. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Deelman, E.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Duncan, J.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z. B.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feicht, J.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, P. W. F.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gabel, M.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Galloway, D. K.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Ganija, M. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaudio, S.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glover, L.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gomes, S.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannuksela, O. A.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horst, C.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Intini, G.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katolik, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kemball, A. J.;
Kennedy, R.;
Kent, C.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Kwang, S.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Lai, K. H.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lo, R. K. L.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lousto, C. O.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lumaca, D.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Hernandez, I. Magana;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magana;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markakis, C.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mayani, R.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McCuller, L.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Mejuto-Villa, E.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Ng, K. K. Y.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nichols, D.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ormiston, R.;
Ortega, L. F.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Page, M. A.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pang, B.;
Pang, P. T. H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E. K.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Ricci, F.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rieger, S.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Ross, M. P.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Rynge, M.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sandeen, B.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schulte, B. W.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seidel, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shah, A. A.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shao, L.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sonnenberg, J. A.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, J. A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, K. W.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ueno, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahi, K.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walet, R.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, J. Z.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y. -F.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessel, E. K.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Wofford, J.;
Wong, K. W. K.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y. -H.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Steeghs, D.;
Wang, L.
Submitted: 2017-06-09, last modified: 2019-11-16
We present the results of a semicoherent search for continuous gravitational
waves from the low-mass X-ray binary Scorpius X-1, using data from the first
Advanced LIGO observing run. The search method uses details of the modelled,
parametrized continuous signal to combine coherently data separated by less
than a specified coherence time, which can be adjusted to trade off sensitivity
against computational cost. A search was conducted over the frequency range
from 25 Hz to 2000 Hz, spanning the current observationally-constrained range
of the binary orbital parameters. No significant detection candidates were
found, and frequency-dependent upper limits were set using a combination of
sensitivity estimates and simulated signal injections. The most stringent upper
limit was set at 175 Hz, with comparable limits set across the most sensitive
frequency range from 100 Hz to 200 Hz. At this frequency, the 95 pct upper
limit on signal amplitude h0 is 2.3e-25 marginalized over the unknown
inclination angle of the neutron star's spin, and 8.03e-26 assuming the best
orientation (which results in circularly polarized gravitational waves). These
limits are a factor of 3-4 stronger than those set by other analyses of the
same data, and a factor of about 7 stronger than the best upper limits set
using initial LIGO data. In the vicinity of 100 Hz, the limits are a factor of
between 1.2 and 3.5 above the predictions of the torque balance model,
depending on inclination angle, if the most likely inclination angle of 44
degrees is assumed, they are within a factor of 1.7.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.05882 [pdf] - 2065319
The Most Massive Binary Black Hole Detections and the Identification of
Population Outliers
Submitted: 2019-11-13
Advanced LIGO and Virgo detected ten binary black holes (BBHs) in their first
two observing runs (O1 and O2). Analysis of these events found strong evidence
for a dearth of BBHs with component masses greater than $\sim45 \ M_\odot$, as
would be expected from a pair-instability mass gap. Meanwhile, a standalone
analysis of the merger GW170729 found its primary mass $m_1 =
{51.2^{+16.2}_{-11.0} \ M_\odot}$, with the majority of its posterior support
at $m_1 > 45 \ M_\odot$. Although this appears to be in contradiction with the
existence of a limit at $\sim45\ M_\odot$, we argue that individual events
cannot be evaluated without reference to the entire population. When GW170729
is analyzed jointly with the rest of the detections, as part of a full
hierarchical population analysis, its inferred primary mass tightens
considerably, to $m_1 = {38.9^{+7.3}_{-4.5} \ M_\odot}$. For a large sample of
events in the presence of noise, apparent outliers in the detected distribution
are inevitable, even if the underlying population forbids outliers. We discuss
methods of distinguishing between statistical fluctuations and population
outliers using posterior predictive tests. Applying these tests to the primary
mass distribution in O1 and O2, we find that the ten detections are consistent
with even the simplest power-law plus maximum-mass model considered by the LVC.
This supports the claim that GW170729 is not a population outlier. We also
provide non-parametric constraints on the rate of high-mass mergers and
conservatively bound the rate of mergers with $m_1 > 45 \ M_\odot$ at
$2.8^{+5.4}_{-2.0}\%$ of the total merger rate. After 100 detections like those
of O1 and O2 from a population with a maximum primary mass of $45 \, M_\odot$,
it would be common for the most massive system to have an observed
maximum-likelihood mass $m_1 \gtrsim 70 \, M_\odot$.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.09740 [pdf] - 2061590
Nonparametric Inference of Neutron Star Composition, Equation of State,
and Maximum Mass with GW170817
Submitted: 2019-10-21
The detection of GW170817 in gravitational waves provides unprecedented
constraints on the equation of state (EOS) of the ultra-dense matter within the
cores of neutron stars (NSs). We extend the nonparametric analysis first
introduced in Landry & Essick (2019), and confirm that GW170817 favors soft
EOSs. We infer macroscopic observables for a canonical 1.4 $M_{\odot}$ NS,
including the tidal deformability $\Lambda_{1.4} = 211^{+312}_{-137}$
($491^{+216}_{-181}$) and radius $R_{1.4}= 10.86^{+2.04}_{-1.42}$
($12.51^{+1.00}_{-0.88}$) km, as well as the maximum mass for nonrotating NSs,
$M_{max} = 2.064^{+0.260}_{-1.34}$ ($2.017^{0.238}_{-0.087}$) $M_\odot$, with
nonparametric priors loosely (tightly) constrained to resemble candidate EOSs
from the literature. Furthermore, we find weak evidence that GW170817 involved
at least one NS based on gravitational-wave data alone ($B^{NS}_{BBH}= 3.3 \pm
1.4$), consistent with the observation of electromagnetic counterparts. We also
investigate GW170817's implications for the maximum spin frequency of
millisecond pulsars, and find that the fastest known pulsar is spinning at more
than 50% of its breakup frequency at 90% confidence. We additionally find
modest evidence in favor of quark matter within NSs, and GW170817 favors the
presence of at least one disconnected hybrid star branch in the mass--radius
relation over a single stable branch by a factor of 2. Assuming there are
multiple stable branches, we find a suggestive posterior preference for a sharp
softening around nuclear density followed by stiffening around twice nuclear
density, consistent with a strong first-order phase transition. While the
statistical evidence in favor of new physics within NS cores remains tenuous
with GW170817 alone, these tantalizing hints reemphasize the promise of
gravitational waves for constraining the supranuclear EOS.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.12907 [pdf] - 1973647
GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers
Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abraham, S.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, G.;
Allocca, A.;
Aloy, M. A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amato, A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Angelova, S. V.;
Antier, S.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arène, M.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aubin, F.;
Aufmuth, P.;
AultONeal, K.;
Austin, C.;
Avendano, V.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Badaracco, F.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Bae, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barkett, K.;
Barnum, S.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bayley, J. C.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bécsy, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bell, A. S.;
Beniwal, D.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bernuzzi, S.;
Bero, J. J.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bidler, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Bilgili, S. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Biscoveanu, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bode, N.;
Boer, M.;
Boetzel, Y.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonilla, E.;
Bonnand, R.;
Booker, P.;
Boom, B. A.;
Booth, C. D.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bossie, K.;
Bossilkov, V.;
Bosveld, J.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Bramley, A.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Briggs, J. H.;
Brighenti, F.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brunett, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Rosell, M. J. Bustamante;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campbell, W. A.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Carney, M. F.;
Carullo, G.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cerdá-Durán, P.;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chakravarti, K.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chase, E. A.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatterjee, D.;
Chaturvedi, M.;
Chatziioannou, K.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Cheong, C. K.;
Chia, H. Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, G.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, K. W.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciobanu, A. A.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cipriano, F.;
Cirone, A.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clearwater, P.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Cohen, D.;
Colgan, R.;
Colleoni, M.;
Collette, C. G.;
Collins, C.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corban, P.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordero-Carrión, I.;
Corley, K. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Cotesta, R.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Croquette, M.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Dálya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Datrier, L. E. H.;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
DeBra, D.;
Deenadayalan, M.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
DeMarchi, L. M.;
Demos, N.;
Dent, T.;
De Pietri, R.;
Derby, J.;
De Rosa, R.;
De Rossi, C.;
DeSalvo, R.;
de Varona, O.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M. C.;
Dietrich, T.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Ding, B.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Dmitriev, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducoin, J. -G.;
Dupej, P.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Easter, P. J.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenmann, M.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Estelles, H.;
Estevez, D.;
Etienne, Z. B.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fazio, M.;
Fee, C.;
Feicht, J.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feng, F.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferreira, T. A.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fishbach, M.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Fishner, J. M.;
Fitz-Axen, M.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Flynn, E.;
Fong, H.;
Font, J. A.;
Forsyth, P. W. F.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Ganija, M. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garcia, A.;
García-Quirós, C.;
Garufi, F.;
Gateley, B.;
Gaudio, S.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giacomazzo, B.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Giordano, G.;
Glover, L.;
Godwin, P.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Goncharov, B.;
González, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Grassia, P.;
Gray, C.;
Gray, R.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Green, R.;
Gretarsson, E. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Gulati, H. K.;
Guo, Y.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Haegel, L.;
Halim, O.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, E. Z.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hannuksela, O. A.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Haris, K.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayes, F. J.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Vivanco, Francisco Hernandez;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hinderer, T.;
Hoak, D.;
Hochheim, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Holgado, A. M.;
Holland, N. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horst, C.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hoy, C. G.;
Hreibi, A.;
Huang, Y.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Hulko, M.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idzkowski, B.;
Iess, A.;
Ingram, C.;
Inta, R.;
Intini, G.;
Irwin, B.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jadhav, S. J.;
Jani, K.;
Janthalur, N. N.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jenkins, A. C.;
Jiang, J.;
Johnson, D. S.;
Johnson-McDaniel, N. K.;
Jones, A. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kamai, B.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kashyap, R.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsanevas, S.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kawabe, K.;
Keerthana, N. V.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, H.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Khursheed, M.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimball, C.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinley-Hanlon, M.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klika, J. H.;
Klimenko, S.;
Knowles, T. D.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koekoek, G.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Koper, N.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnendu, N.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Kwang, S.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Lai, K. H.;
Lam, T. L.;
Landry, M.;
Lane, B. B.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lecoeuche, Y. K.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, J.;
Li, K. J. L.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Li, X.;
Lin, F.;
Linde, F.;
Linker, S. D.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lo, R. K. L.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
London, L. T.;
Longo, A.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lousto, C. O.;
Lovelace, G.;
Lower, M. E.;
Lück, H.;
Lumaca, D.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macas, R.;
Macfoy, S.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Macquet, A.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magaña;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malik, A.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markakis, C.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Markowitz, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marquina, A.;
Marsat, S.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Massera, E.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCann, J. J.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McCuller, L.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Mehta, A. K.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Mereni, L.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Millhouse, M.;
Mills, J. C.;
Milovich-Goff, M. C.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mishkin, A.;
Mishra, C.;
Mistry, T.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Mo, G.;
Moffa, D.;
Mogushi, K.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morisaki, S.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muñiz, E. A.;
Muratore, M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nagar, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Neilson, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Ng, K. Y.;
Ng, S.;
Nguyen, P.;
Nichols, D.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
North, C.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Obergaulinger, M.;
Oberling, J.;
O'Brien, B. D.;
O'Dea, G. D.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Ohta, H.;
Okada, M. A.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ormiston, R. G.;
Ortega, L. F.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ossokine, S.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Pagano, G.;
Page, M. A.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, Huang-Wei;
Pang, B.;
Pang, P. T. H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parida, A.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patil, M.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedersen, C.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perego, A.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Phukon, K. S.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pirello, M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Pong, D. Y. T.;
Ponrathnam, S.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E. K.;
Powell, J.;
Prajapati, A. K.;
Prasad, J.;
Prasai, K.;
Prasanna, R.;
Pratten, G.;
Prestegard, T.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quinonez, P. J.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Radkins, H.;
Radulescu, N.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rajbhandari, B.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Ramos-Buades, A.;
Rana, Javed;
Rao, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ren, W.;
Ricci, F.;
Richardson, C. J.;
Richardson, J. W.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Riemenschneider, G. M.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romanelli, M.;
Romano, R.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rose, K.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rosofsky, S. G.;
Ross, M. P.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Rutins, G.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salafia, O.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sanchez, L. E.;
Sanchis-Gual, N.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Santiago, K. A.;
Sarin, N.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Schale, P.;
Scheel, M.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schönbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schulte, B. W.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seidel, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sennett, N.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaner, M. B.;
Shao, L.;
Sharma, P.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shen, H.;
Shink, R.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
ShyamSundar, S.;
Siellez, K.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, N.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Sitmukhambetov, S.;
Skliris, V.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slaven-Blair, T. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Somala, S.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Sowell, E.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Srivastava, V.;
Staats, K.;
Stachie, C.;
Standke, M.;
Steer, D. A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stocks, D.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D. J.;
Strain, K. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Strunk, A.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Sudhir, V.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Suresh, J.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Tait, S. C.;
Talbot, C.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tápai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Tasson, J. D.;
Taylor, R.;
Thies, F.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thondapu, S. R.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, Shubhanshu;
Tiwari, Srishti;
Tiwari, V.;
Toland, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres-Forné, A.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Töyrä, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trovato, A.;
Trozzo, L.;
Trudeau, R.;
Tsang, K. W.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Tsukada, L.;
Tsuna, D.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ueno, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walet, R.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, J. Z.;
Wang, W. H.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warden, Z. A.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wellmann, F.;
Wen, L.;
Wessel, E. K.;
Weßels, P.;
Westhouse, J. W.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, L. V.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Wilken, D. M.;
Williams, D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Wofford, J. K.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wysocki, D. M.;
Xiao, L.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, L.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yazback, M.;
Yeeles, D. W.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yuen, S. H. R.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A. K.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zappa, F.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, J.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zimmerman, A. B.;
Zlochower, Y.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2018-11-30, last modified: 2019-10-04
We present the results from three gravitational-wave searches for coalescing
compact binaries with component masses above 1$\mathrm{M}_\odot$ during the
first and second observing runs of the Advanced gravitational-wave detector
network. During the first observing run (O1), from September $12^\mathrm{th}$,
2015 to January $19^\mathrm{th}$, 2016, gravitational waves from three binary
black hole mergers were detected. The second observing run (O2), which ran from
November $30^\mathrm{th}$, 2016 to August $25^\mathrm{th}$, 2017, saw the first
detection of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, in
addition to the observation of gravitational waves from a total of seven binary
black hole mergers, four of which we report here for the first time: GW170729,
GW170809, GW170818 and GW170823. For all significant gravitational-wave events,
we provide estimates of the source properties. The detected binary black holes
have total masses between $18.6_{-0.7}^{+3.2}\mathrm{M}_\odot$, and
$84.4_{-11.1}^{+15.8} \mathrm{M}_\odot$, and range in distance between
$320_{-110}^{+120}$ Mpc and $2840_{-1360}^{+1400}$ Mpc. No neutron star - black
hole mergers were detected. In addition to highly significant
gravitational-wave events, we also provide a list of marginal event candidates
with an estimated false alarm rate less than 1 per 30 days. From these results
over the first two observing runs, which include approximately one
gravitational-wave detection per 15 days of data searched, we infer merger
rates at the 90% confidence intervals of $110\, -\, 3840$
$\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$ for binary neutron stars and $9.7\, -\,
101$ $\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$ for binary black holes assuming fixed
population distributions, and determine a neutron star - black hole merger rate
90% upper limit of $610$ $\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{y}^{-1}$.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.09084 [pdf] - 1971390
A Future Percent-Level Measurement of the Hubble Expansion at Redshift
0.8 With Advanced LIGO
Submitted: 2019-08-23, last modified: 2019-09-06
Simultaneous measurements of distance and redshift can be used to constrain
the expansion history of the universe and associated cosmological parameters.
Merging binary black hole (BBH) systems are standard sirens---their
gravitational waveform provides direct information about the luminosity
distance to the source. Because gravity is scale-free, there is a perfect
degeneracy between the source masses and redshift; some non-gravitational
information is necessary to break the degeneracy and determine the redshift of
the source. Here we suggest that the pair instability supernova (PISN) process,
thought to be the source of the observed upper-limit on the black hole (BH)
mass in merging BBH systems at $\sim 45 \, M_\odot$, imprints a mass scale in
the population of BBH mergers and permits a measurement of the
redshift-luminosity-distance relation with these sources. We simulate five
years of BBH detections in the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors with realistic
assumptions about the BBH merger rate, a mass distribution incorporating a
smooth PISN cutoff, and measurement uncertainty. We show that after one year of
operation at design sensitivity (circa 2021) the BBH population can constrain
$H(z)$ to $6.1\%$ at a pivot redshift $z \simeq 0.8$. After five years (circa
2025) the constraint improves to $2.9\%$. This measurement relies only on
general relativity and the presence of a cutoff mass scale that is
approximately fixed or calibrated across cosmic time; it is independent of any
distance ladder or cosmological model. Observations by future
``third-generation'' gravitational wave detectors, which can see BBH mergers
throughout the universe, would permit sub-percent cosmographical measurements
to $z \gtrsim 4$ within one month of observation.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.00873 [pdf] - 1916951
Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings
Submitted: 2019-06-03, last modified: 2019-06-17
The presence of a bright "photon ring" surrounding a dark "black hole shadow"
has been discussed as an important feature of the observational appearance of
emission originating near a black hole. We clarify the meaning and relevance of
these heuristics with analytic calculations and numerical toy models. The
standard usage of the term "shadow" describes the appearance of a black hole
illuminated from all directions, including from behind the observer. A backlit
black hole casts a somewhat larger shadow. Neither shadow heuristic is
particularly relevant to understanding the appearance of emission originating
near the black hole, where the emission profile and gravitational redshift play
the dominant roles in determining the observed size of the central dark area. A
photon ring results from light rays that orbit near the black hole before
escaping to infinity, where they arrive near a ring-shaped "critical curve" on
the image plane. Although the brightness can become arbitrarily large near this
critical curve in the case of optically thin emitting matter, we show that the
enhancement is only logarithmic, and hence is of no relevance to present
observations. For optically thin emission from a geometrically thin or thick
disk, photons that make only a fraction of an orbit will generically give rise
to a much wider "lensing ring," which is a demagnified image of the back of the
disk, superimposed on top of the direct emission. The lensing ring is centered
at a radius ~5% larger than the photon ring and its width is ~0.5-1M. It can be
relatively brighter by a factor of 2-3 and thus could provide a significant
feature in high resolution images. Nevertheless, the characteristic features of
the observed image are dominated by the location and properties of the emitting
matter near the black hole. We comment on the recent M87* Event Horizon
Telescope observations and mass measurement.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.01579 [pdf] - 1943240
A Search for Optical Emission from Binary-Black-Hole Merger GW170814
with the Dark Energy Camera
Doctor, Z.;
Kessler, R.;
Herner, K.;
Palmese, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Holz, D. E.;
Sako, M.;
Rest, A.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Berger, E.;
Foley, R. J.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Allam, S.;
Balbinot, E.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Chornock, R.;
Cook, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Farr, B.;
Fong, W.;
Frieman, J.;
Fryer, C.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Salim, S.;
Sauseda, M.;
Secco, L. F.;
Smith, N.;
Smith, R. C.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-12-04, last modified: 2019-04-10
Binary black hole (BBH) mergers found by the LIGO and Virgo detectors are of
immense scientific interest to the astrophysics community, but are considered
unlikely to be sources of electromagnetic emission. To test whether they have
rapidly fading optical counterparts, we used the Dark Energy Camera to perform
an $i$-band search for the BBH merger GW170814, the first gravitational wave
detected by three interferometers. The 87-deg$^2$ localization region (at 90\%
confidence) centered in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) footprint enabled us to
image 86\% of the probable sky area to a depth of $i\sim 23$ mag and provide
the most comprehensive dataset to search for EM emission from BBH mergers. To
identify candidates, we perform difference imaging with our search images and
with templates from pre-existing DES images. The analysis strategy and
selection requirements were designed to remove supernovae and to identify
transients that decline in the first two epochs. We find two candidates, each
of which is spatially coincident with a star or a high-redshift galaxy in the
DES catalogs, and they are thus unlikely to be associated with GW170814. Our
search finds no candidates associated with GW170814, disfavoring rapidly
declining optical emission from BBH mergers brighter than $i\sim 23$ mag
($L_{\rm optical} \sim 5\times10^{41}$ erg/s) 1-2 days after coalescence. In
terms of GW sky map coverage, this is the most complete search for optical
counterparts to BBH mergers to date
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.03321 [pdf] - 1863944
Standard sirens with a running Planck mass
Submitted: 2019-01-10, last modified: 2019-03-22
We consider the effect of a time-varying Planck mass on the propagation of
gravitational waves (GWs). A running Planck mass arises naturally in several
modified gravity theories, and here we focus on those that carry an additional
dark energy field responsible for the late-time accelerated expansion of the
universe, yet--like general relativity (GR)--propagate only two GW
polarizations, both traveling at the speed of light. Because a time-varying
Planck mass affects the amplitude of the GWs and therefore the inferred
distance to the source, standard siren measurements of $H_0$ are degenerate
with the parameter $c_M$ characterizing the time-varying Planck mass, where
$c_M=0$ corresponds to GR with a constant Planck mass. The effect of non-zero
$c_M$ will have a noticeable impact on GWs emitted by binary neutron stars
(BNSs) at the sensitivities and distances observable by ground-based GW
detectors such as advanced LIGO and A+, implying that standard siren
measurements can provide joint constraints on $H_0$ and $c_M$. Assuming a
$\Lambda$CDM evolution of the universe and taking Planck's measurement of $H_0$
as a prior, we find that GW170817 constrains $c_M = -9^{+21}_{-28}$ ($68.3\%$
credibility). We also discuss forecasts, finding that if we assume $H_0$ is
known independently, then 100 BNS events detected by advanced LIGO can
constrain $c_M$ to within $\pm0.9$. This is comparable to the current best
constraints from cosmology. Similarly, for 100 LIGO A+ BNS detections, it is
possible to constrain $c_M$ to $\pm0.5$. When analyzing joint $H_0$ and $c_M$
constraints we find that $\sim 400$ LIGO A+ events are needed to constrain
$H_0$ to $1\%$ accuracy. Finally, we discuss the possibility of a nonzero value
of $c_M$ biasing standard siren $H_0$ measurements from 100 LIGO A+ detections,
and find that $c_M=+1.35$ could bias $H_0$ by 3-4$\sigma$ too low if we
incorrectly assume $c_M=0$.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04657 [pdf] - 1847054
Astro2020 Science White Paper: Cosmology with a Space-Based
Gravitational Wave Observatory
Caldwell, Robert;
Amin, Mustafa;
Hogan, Craig;
Holley-Bockelmann, Kelly;
Holz, Daniel;
Jetzer, Philippe;
Kovetz, Ely;
Natarajan, Priya;
Shoemaker, David;
Smith, Tristan;
Tamanini, Nicola
Submitted: 2019-03-11
There are two big questions cosmologists would like to answer -- How does the
Universe work, and what are its origin and destiny? A long wavelength
gravitational wave detector -- with million km interferometer arms, achievable
only from space -- gives a unique opportunity to address both of these
questions. A sensitive, mHz frequency observatory could use the inspiral and
merger of massive black hole binaries as standard sirens, extending our ability
to characterize the expansion history of the Universe from the onset of dark
energy-domination out to a redshift z ~ 10. A low-frequency detector,
furthermore, offers the best chance for discovery of exotic gravitational wave
sources, including a primordial stochastic background, that could reveal clues
to the origin of our Universe.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.08076 [pdf] - 1953416
Calibrating gravitational-wave detectors with GW170817
Submitted: 2019-02-21
The waveform of a compact binary coalescence is predicted by general
relativity. It is therefore possible to directly constrain the response of a
gravitational-wave (GW) detector by analyzing a signal's observed amplitude and
phase evolution as a function of frequency. GW signals alone constrain the
relative amplitude and phase between different frequencies within the same
detector and between different detectors. We analyze GW170817's ability to
calibrate the LIGO/Virgo detectors, finding a relative amplitude calibration
precision of approximately $\pm20\%$ and relative phase precision of
$\pm15^\circ$ (1-$\sigma$ uncertainty) between the LIGO Hanford and Livingston
detectors. Incorporating additional information about the distance and
inclination of the source from electromagnetic observations, the relative
amplitude of the LIGO detectors can be tightened to $\sim\pm15\%$. We
investigate the ability of future events to improve astronomical calibration.
By simulating the cumulative uncertainties from an ensemble of detections, we
find that with several hundred events with electromagnetic counterparts, or
several thousand events without counterparts, we reach percent-level
astronomical calibration. This corresponds to $\sim$5-10 years of operation at
advanced LIGO and Virgo design sensitivity. It is to be emphasized that direct
{\em in-situ}\/ measurements of detector calibration provide significantly
higher precision than astronomical sources, and already constrain the
calibration to a few percent in amplitude and a few degrees in phase. In this
sense, our astronomical calibrators only corroborate existing calibration
measurements. Nonetheless, astrophysical calibration may become an important
corroboration of existing calibration methods, providing a completely
independent constraint of potential systematics.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.11579 [pdf] - 1820124
Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agarwal, B.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G.;
Allocca, A.;
Aloy, M. A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amato, A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Angelova, S. V.;
Antier, S.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ar`ene, M.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Atallah, D. V.;
Aubin, F.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
AultONeal, K.;
Austin, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Badaracco, F.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Bae, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barkett, K.;
Barnum, S.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bayley, J. C.;
Bazzan, M.;
B'ecsy, B.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bell, A. S.;
Beniwal, D.;
Bensch, M.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bernuzzi, S.;
Bero, J. J.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Bilgili, S. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Biscoveanu, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bode, N.;
Boer, M.;
Boetzel, Y.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonilla, E.;
Bonnand, R.;
Booker, P.;
Boom, B. A.;
Booth, C. D.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bossie, K.;
Bossilkov, V.;
Bosveld, J.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Bramley, A.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brighenti, F.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Canizares, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Carney, M. F.;
Carullo, G.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Cerd'a-Dur'an, P.;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chase, E.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatterjee, D.;
Chatziioannou, K.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chia, H. Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, K. W.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciobanu, A. A.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cipriano, F.;
Cirelli, C. E.;
Cirone, A.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clearwater, P.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Cohen, D.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Collins, C.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corban, P.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordero-Carri'on, I.;
Corley, K. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Cotesta, R.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
D'alya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
DeBra, D.;
Deenadayalan, M.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Demos, N.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
De Pietri, R.;
Derby, J.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
De Rossi, C.;
DeSalvo, R.;
de Varona, O.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Dietrich, T.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Ding, B.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Dmitriev, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Dreissigacker, C.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dudi, R.;
Dupej, P.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Easter, P. J.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenmann, M.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Estelles, H.;
Estevez, D.;
Etienne, Z. B.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fee, C.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feicht, J.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feng, F.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fishbach, M.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Fishner, J. M.;
Fitz-Axen, M.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Font, J. A.;
Forsyth, P. W. F.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Ganija, M. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garcia, A.;
Garc'ia-Quir'os, C.;
Garufi, F.;
Gateley, B.;
Gaudio, S.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giacomazzo, B.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Giordano, G.;
Glover, L.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Goncharov, B.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Green, R.;
Gretarsson, E. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Gulati, H. K.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Halim, O.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, E. Z.;
Hamilton, H. F.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hannuksela, O. A.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Hernandez, F. J.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hinderer, T.;
Hoak, D.;
Hochheim, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Holland, N. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horst, C.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hreibi, A.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Hulko, M.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Iess, A.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, C.;
Inta, R.;
Intini, G.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Johnson, D. S.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kamai, B.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Kastaun, W.;
Katolik, M.;
Katsanevas, S.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kawabe, K.;
Keerthana, N. V.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kemball, A. J.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khamesra, B.;
Khan, H.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinley-Hanlon, M.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Knowles, T. D.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Kwang, S.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Lai, K. H.;
Landry, M.;
Landry, P.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Li, X.;
Linker, S. D.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lo, R. K. L.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
London, L. T.;
Longo, A.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lousto, C. O.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lumaca, D.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macas, R.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Hernandez, I. Magaña;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magaña;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markakis, C.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Markowitz, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marquina, A.;
Marsat, S.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Massera, E.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCann, J. J.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McCuller, L.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Mejuto-Villa, E.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Mereni, L.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Mills, J.;
Milovich-Goff, M. C.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moffa, D.;
Mogushi, K.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morisaki, S.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muñiz, E. A.;
Muratore, M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nagar, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Neilson, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Nevin, L.;
Newport, J. M.;
Ng, K. Y.;
Ng, S.;
Nguyen, P.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nichols, D.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
North, C.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Obergaulinger, M.;
Oberling, J.;
O'Brien, B. D.;
O'Dea, G. D.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Ohta, H.;
Okada, M. A.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ormiston, R.;
Ortega, L. F.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ossokine, S.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Pagano, G.;
Page, J.;
Page, M. A.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, Howard;
Pan, Huang-Wei;
Pang, B.;
Pang, P. T. H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parida, A.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patil, M.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedersen, C.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Phukon, K. S.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pirello, M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E. K.;
Possenti, L.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Pratten, G.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rajbhandari, B.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Ramos-Buades, A.;
Rana, Javed;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ren, W.;
Ricci, F.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Riemenschneider, G.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Robson, T.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Ross, M. P.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Rutins, G.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sanchez, L. E.;
Sanchis-Gual, N.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sarin, N.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheel, M.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schulte, B. W.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seidel, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shah, A. A.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaner, M. B.;
Shao, L.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shen, H.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slaven-Blair, T. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Somala, S.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staats, K.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Steltner, B.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stocks, D.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D. J.;
Strain, K. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Strunk, A.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Suresh, J.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Tait, S. C.;
Talbot, C.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Tasson, J. D.;
Taylor, J. A.;
Taylor, R.;
Tewari, S. V.;
Theeg, T.;
Thies, F.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres-Forn'e, A.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, K. W.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Tsuna, D.;
Tsukada, L.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ueno, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walet, R.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, J. Z.;
Wang, W. H.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wellmann, F.;
Wen, L.;
Wessel, E. K.;
Wessels, P.;
Westerweck, J.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Wilken, D.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Wofford, J. K.;
Wong, W. K.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wysocki, D. M.;
Xiao, S.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, L.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yazback, M.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, J.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y. -H.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zimmerman, A. B.;
Zlochower, Y.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2018-05-29, last modified: 2019-01-22
On August 17, 2017, the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo gravitational-wave
detectors observed a low-mass compact binary inspiral. The initial sky
localization of the source of the gravitational-wave signal, GW170817, allowed
electromagnetic observatories to identify NGC 4993 as the host galaxy. In this
work, we improve initial estimates of the binary's properties, including
component masses, spins, and tidal parameters, using the known source location,
improved modeling, and recalibrated Virgo data. We extend the range of
gravitational-wave frequencies considered down to 23 Hz, compared to 30 Hz in
the initial analysis. We also compare results inferred using several signal
models, which are more accurate and incorporate additional physical effects as
compared to the initial analysis. We improve the localization of the
gravitational-wave source to a 90% credible region of $16~\mathrm{deg}^2$. We
find tighter constraints on the masses, spins, and tidal parameters, and
continue to find no evidence for nonzero component spins. The component masses
are inferred to lie between 1.00 and 1.89 $M_\odot$ when allowing for large
component spins, and to lie between 1.16 and 1.60 $M_\odot$ (with a total mass
$2.73^{+0.04}_{-0.01} \, M_\odot$) when the spins are restricted to be within
the range observed in Galactic binary neutron stars. Under minimal assumptions
about the nature of the compact objects, our constraints for the tidal
deformability parameter $\tilde \Lambda$ are $(0,630)$ when we allow for large
component spins, and $300^{+420}_{-230}$ (using a 90% highest posterior density
interval) when restricting the magnitude of the component spins, ruling out
several equation-of-state models at the 90% credible level. Finally, with LIGO
and GEO600 data, we use a Bayesian analysis to place upper limits on the
amplitude and spectral energy density of a possible post-merger signal.
(Abridged)
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.05667 [pdf] - 1822830
A standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from GW170817
without the electromagnetic counterpart
Fishbach, M.;
Gray, R.;
Hernandez, I. Magaña;
Qi, H.;
Sur, A.;
Acernese, F.;
Aiello, L.;
Allocca, A.;
Aloy, M. A.;
Amato, A.;
Antier, S.;
Arène, M.;
Arnaud, N.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Astone, P.;
Aubin, F.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Badaracco, F.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Barone, F.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Basti, A.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bernuzzi, S.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blair, C. D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Boschi, V.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Branchesi, M.;
Briant, T.;
Brighenti, F.;
Brillet, A.;
Brisson, V.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Calloni, E.;
Canepa, M.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carullo, G.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cerdá-Durán, P.;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatziioannou, K.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cipriano, F.;
Cirone, A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Cohen, D.;
Conti, L.;
Cordero-Carrión, I.;
Cortese, S.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Croquette, M.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dálya, G.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Datrier, L. E. H.;
Dattilo, V.;
Davier, M.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denys, M.;
De Pietri, R.;
De Rosa, R.;
De Rossi, C.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dietrich, T.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drago, M.;
Ducoin, J. -G.;
Eisenmann, M.;
Essick, R. C.;
Estevez, D.;
Fafone, V.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, W. M.;
Feng, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Flaminio, R.;
Font, J. A.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frey, V.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garufi, F.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
Germain, V.;
Ghosh, A.;
Giacomazzo, B.;
Giazotto, A.;
Giordano, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Granata, M.;
Greco, G.;
Groot, P.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, Y.;
Halim, O.;
Harms, J.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Hinderer, T.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hreibi, A.;
Huet, D.;
Idzkowski, B.;
Iess, A.;
Intini, G.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Katsanevas, S.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Khan, I.;
Koekoek, G.;
Koley, S.;
Kowalska, I.;
Królak, A.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lange, J.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Linde, F.;
Longo, A.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lumaca, D.;
Macas, R.;
Macquet, A.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Markakis, C.;
Marquina, A.;
Martelli, F.;
Massera, E.;
Masserot, A.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Meidam, J.;
Mereni, L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Messenger, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Montani, M.;
Morisaki, S.;
Mours, B.;
Nagar, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nichols, D.;
Nocera, F.;
Obergaulinger, M.;
Pagano, G.;
Palomba, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patil, M.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pedurand, R.;
Perreca, A.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Radulescu, N.;
Raffai, P.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Ricci, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Romanelli, M.;
Romano, R.;
Rosińska, D.;
Ruggi, P.;
Salconi, L.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sanchis-Gual, N.;
Sassolas, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Singh, N.;
Singhal, A.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Stachie, C.;
Steer, D. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Tacca, M.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres-Forné, A.;
Travasso, F.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trovato, A.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, K. W.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
Vardaro, M.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vocca, H.;
Walet, R.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Was, M.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zimmerman, A. B.
Submitted: 2018-07-15, last modified: 2019-01-05
We perform a statistical standard siren analysis of GW170817. Our analysis
does not utilize knowledge of NGC 4993 as the unique host galaxy of the optical
counterpart to GW170817. Instead, we consider each galaxy within the GW170817
localization region as a potential host; combining the redshift from each
galaxy with the distance estimate from GW170817 provides an estimate of the
Hubble constant, $H_0$. We then combine the $H_0$ values from all the galaxies
to provide a final measurement of $H_0$. We explore the dependence of our
results on the thresholds by which galaxies are included in our sample, as well
as the impact of weighting the galaxies by stellar mass and star-formation
rate. Considering all galaxies brighter than $0.01 L^\star_B$ as equally likely
to host a BNS merger, we find $H_0= 76^{+48}_{-23}$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$
(maximum a posteriori and 68.3% highest density posterior interval; assuming a
flat $H_0$ prior in the range $\left[ 10, 220 \right]$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$).
Restricting only to galaxies brighter than $0.626 L^\star_B$ tightens the
measurement to $H_0= 77^{+37}_{-18}$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. We show that
weighting the host galaxies by stellar mass or star-formation rate provides
entirely consistent results with potentially tighter constraints. While these
statistical estimates are inferior to the value from the counterpart standard
siren measurement utilizing NGC 4993 as the unique host, $H_0=76^{+19}_{-13}$
km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (determined from the same publicly available data), our
analysis is a proof-of-principle demonstration of the statistical approach
first proposed by Bernard Schutz over 30 years ago.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.10065 [pdf] - 1806373
Binary neutron star formation and the origin of GW170817
Belczynski, K.;
Bulik, T.;
Olejak, A.;
Chruslinska, M.;
Singh, N.;
Pol, N.;
Zdunik, L.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
McLaughlin, M.;
Lorimer, D.;
Korobkin, O.;
Heuvel, E. P. J. van den;
Davies, M. B.;
Holz, D. E.
Submitted: 2018-12-25
The first neutron star-neutron star merger was detected in by LIGO/Virgo in a
galaxy in which the majority of star formation was taking place a long time ago
(11 Gyr). LIGO/Virgo estimated that local cosmic NS-NS merger rate is 110-3840
Gpc^-3 yr^-1. Only some extreme evolutionary models can generate NS-NS merger
rates in old host galaxies consistent with the LIGO/Virgo estimate. However, we
show that these models generate rates exceeding empirical Galactic NS-NS merger
rates based on the large population of Milky Way NS-NS binaries. Typically,
current evolutionary models produce NS-NS merger rates that are consistent with
the Milky Way empirical rates. However, these models generate local cosmic
NS-NS merger rate in old host galaxies that are below the LIGO/Virgo estimate.
The reason behind this tension is the predicted delay time distribution between
star formation and NS-NS mergers that favors short delays. Evolutionary models
produce a generic steep power-law NS-NS delay time distribution. This limits
NS-NS merger rates in old host galaxies. However, we show that such
distribution is consistent with observations of Galactic NS-NS binaries; 50% of
which show very long merger times (much longer than Hubble time). Once model
distributions are convolved with continuous prolonged (10 Gyr) star formation
in the Galactic disk, then 20-70% (depending on a model) of the predicted NS-NS
population has very long current Galactic merger times. Although NS-NS binaries
are formed predominantly with short delay times, many of short delay time
systems merge and do not make it to the present, while long delay time systems
survive and contribute to the current Galactic NS-NS population. This study
highlights the tension between the current evolutionary predictions and the
observation of the first NS-NS merger in an old host galaxy.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.04051 [pdf] - 1796011
Target of Opportunity Observations of Gravitational Wave Events with
LSST
Margutti, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Doctor, Z.;
Mortensen, K.;
Pankow, C. P.;
Salafia, O.;
Villar, V. A.;
Alexander, K.;
Annis, J.;
Andreoni, I.;
Baldeschi, A.;
Balmaverde, B.;
Berger, E.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bianco, F.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Brocato, E.;
Carnerero, M. I.;
Cartier, R.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chornock, R.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Copperwheat, C. M.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coppejans, D. L.;
Corsi, A.;
D'Ammando, F.;
Datrier, L.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Dimitriadis, G.;
Drout, M. R.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fox, O.;
Ghirlanda, G.;
Goldstein, D.;
Grindlay, J.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Haiman, Z.;
Hendry, M.;
Holz, D.;
Hung, T.;
Inserra, C.;
Jones, D. O.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kilpatrick, C. D.;
Lamb, G.;
Laskar, T.;
Levan, A.;
Mason, E.;
Maguire, K.;
Melandri, A.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Miller, A.;
Narayan, G.;
Nielsen, E.;
Nicholl, M.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nugent, P.;
Pan, Y. -C.;
Pasham, D.;
Paterson, K.;
Piranomonte, S.;
Racusin, J.;
Rest, A.;
Righi, C.;
Sand, D.;
Seaman, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Siellez, K.;
Singer, L.;
Szkody, P.;
Smith, M.;
Steeghs, D.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tanvir, N.;
Terreran, G.;
Trimble, V.;
Valenti, S.;
Transient, with the support of the LSST;
Collaboration, Variable Stars
Submitted: 2018-12-10
The discovery of the electromagnetic counterparts to the binary neutron star
merger GW170817 has opened the era of GW+EM multi-messenger astronomy.
Exploiting this breakthrough requires increasing samples to explore the
diversity of kilonova behaviour and provide more stringent constraints on the
Hubble constant, and tests of fundamental physics. LSST can play a key role in
this field in the 2020s, when the gravitational wave detector network is
expected to detect higher rates of merger events involving neutron stars
($\sim$10s per year) out to distances of several hundred Mpc. Here we propose
comprehensive target-of-opportunity (ToOs) strategies for follow-up of
gravitational-wave sources that will make LSST the premiere machine for
discovery and early characterization for neutron star mergers and other
gravitational-wave sources.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.07889 [pdf] - 1783869
Impact of inter-correlated initial binary parameters on double black
hole and neutron star mergers
Submitted: 2018-08-23, last modified: 2018-11-13
The distributions of the initial main-sequence binary parameters are one of
the key ingredients in obtaining evolutionary predictions for compact binary
(BH-BH / BH-NS / NS-NS) merger rates. Until now, such calculations were done
under the assumption that initial binary parameter distributions were
independent. Here, we implement empirically derived inter-correlated
distributions of initial binary parameters primary mass (M1), mass ratio (q),
orbital period (P), and eccentricity (e). Unexpectedly, the introduction of
inter-correlated initial binary parameters leads to only a small decrease in
the predicted merger rates by a factor of 2 $-$ 3 relative to the previously
used non-correlated initial distributions. The formation of compact object
mergers in the isolated classical binary evolution favors initial binaries with
stars of comparable masses (q = 0.5 $-$ 1) at intermediate orbital periods (log
P (days) = 2 $-$ 4). New distributions slightly shift the mass ratios towards
smaller values with respect to the previously used flat q distribution, which
is the dominant effect decreasing the rates. New orbital periods only
negligibly increase the number of progenitors. Additionally, we discuss the
uncertainty of merger rate predictions associated with possible variations of
the massive-star initial mass function (IMF). We argue that evolutionary
calculations should be normalized to a star formation rate (SFR) that is
obtained from the observed amount of UV light at wavelength 1500{\AA} (SFR
indicator). In this case, contrary to recent reports, the uncertainty of the
IMF does not affect the rates by more than a factor of 2. Any change to the IMF
slope for massive stars requires a change of SFR in a way that counteracts the
impact of IMF variations on the merger rates. In contrast, we suggest that the
uncertainty in cosmic SFR at low metallicity can be a significant factor at
play.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04856 [pdf] - 1771446
Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first Advanced LIGO Observing Run
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bejger, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bohe, A.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Callister, T.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, C.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Conti, L.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Darman, N. S.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Engels, W.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Fenyvesi, E.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A. G.;
Gaebel, S.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Geng, P.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gordon, N. A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, H.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huang, S.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jang, H.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jian, L.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Johnson-McDaniel, N.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Kehl, M. S.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chi-Woong;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Krueger, C.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Lewis, J. B.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lousto, C.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magana;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D. J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Nedkova, K.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Patrick, Z.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sandeen, B.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O. E. S.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Schilling, R.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schönbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strauss, N. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tápai, M.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Töyrä, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifirò, D.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yablon, J.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yu, H.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2016-06-15, last modified: 2018-10-23
The first observational run of the Advanced LIGO detectors, from September
12, 2015 to January 19, 2016, saw the first detections of gravitational waves
from binary black hole mergers. In this paper we present full results from a
search for binary black hole merger signals with total masses up to $100
M_\odot$ and detailed implications from our observations of these systems. Our
search, based on general-relativistic models of gravitational wave signals from
binary black hole systems, unambiguously identified two signals, GW150914 and
GW151226, with a significance of greater than $5\sigma$ over the observing
period. It also identified a third possible signal, LVT151012, with
substantially lower significance, and with an 87% probability of being of
astrophysical origin. We provide detailed estimates of the parameters of the
observed systems. Both GW150914 and GW151226 provide an unprecedented
opportunity to study the two-body motion of a compact-object binary in the
large velocity, highly nonlinear regime. We do not observe any deviations from
general relativity, and place improved empirical bounds on several high-order
post-Newtonian coefficients. From our observations we infer stellar-mass binary
black hole merger rates lying in the range $9-240 \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}
\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. These observations are beginning to inform astrophysical
predictions of binary black hole formation rates, and indicate that future
observing runs of the Advanced detector network will yield many more
gravitational wave detections.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.07463 [pdf] - 1771571
The cosmological impact of future constraints on $H_0$ from
gravitational-wave standard sirens
Submitted: 2018-06-19, last modified: 2018-10-01
Gravitational-wave standard sirens present a novel approach for the
determination of the Hubble constant. After the recent spectacular confirmation
of the method thanks to GW170817 and its optical counterpart, additional
standard siren measurements from future gravitational-wave sources are expected
to constrain the Hubble constant to high accuracy. At the same time, improved
constraints are expected from observations of cosmic microwave background (CMB)
polarization and from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) surveys. We explore
the role of future standard siren constraints on $H_0$ in light of expected
CMB+BAO data. Considering a $10$-parameters cosmological model, in which
curvature, the dark energy equation of state, and the Hubble constant are
unbounded by CMB observations, we find that a combination of future CMB+BAO
data will constrain the Hubble parameter to $\sim 1.5 \%$. Further extending
the parameter space to a time-varying dark energy equation of state, we find
that future CMB+BAO constraints on $H_0$ are relaxed to $\sim 3.0 \%$. These
accuracies are within reach of future standard siren measurements from the
Hanford-Livingston-Virgo and the Hanford-Livingston-Virgo-Japan-India networks
of interferometers, showing the cosmological relevance of these sources. If
future gravitational-wave standard siren measurements reach $1\%$ on $H_0$, as
expected, they would significantly improve future CMB+BAO constraints on
curvature and on the dark energy equation of state by up to a factor $\sim 3$.
We also show that the inclusion of $H_0$ constraints from gravitational-wave
standard sirens could result in a reduction of the dark energy figure-of-merit
(i.e., the cosmological parameter volume) by up to a factor of $\sim 400$.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:1808.08676 [pdf] - 1834034
Constraining the p-mode--g-mode tidal instability with GW170817
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
The Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agarwal, B.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G.;
Allocca, A.;
Aloy, M. A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amato, A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Angelova, S. V.;
Antier, S.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arène, M.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Atallah, D. V.;
Aubin, F.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
AultONeal, K.;
Austin, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Badaracco, F.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Bae, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Banagiri, S.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barkett, K.;
Barnum, S.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bawaj, M.;
Bayley, J. C.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bécsy, B.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Bell, A. S.;
Beniwal, D.;
Bensch, M.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bernuzzi, S.;
Bero, J. J.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Bilgili, S. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Biscoveanu, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bode, N.;
Boer, M.;
Boetzel, Y.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonilla, E.;
Bonnand, R.;
Booker, P.;
Boom, B. A.;
Booth, C. D.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bossie, K.;
Bossilkov, V.;
Bosveld, J.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Bramley, A.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brighenti, F.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Canizares, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Carney, M. F.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Cerdá-Durán, P.;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chase, E.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chatterjee, D.;
Chatziioannou, Katerina;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chia, H. Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, K. W.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Ciobanu, A. A.;
Ciolfi, R.;
Cipriano, F.;
Cirelli, C. E.;
Cirone, A.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clearwater, P.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Cohen, D.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Collins, C.;
Cominsky, L. R.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corban, P.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cordero-Carrión, I.;
Corley, K. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Cotesta, R.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Dálya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
DÁntonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
DeBra, D.;
Deenadayalan, M.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Demos, N.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
De Pietri, R.;
Derby, J.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
De Rossi, C.;
DeSalvo, R.;
de Varona, O.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D\'{\ı, M. C.;
Di Fiore, az} L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Ding, B.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Renzo, F.;
Dmitriev, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Álvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Dreissigacker, C.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dupej, P.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Easter, P. J.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenmann, M.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Estelles, H.;
Estevez, D.;
Etienne, Z. B.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fee, C.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feicht, J.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feng, F.;
Fernandez-Galiana, A.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fishbach, M.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Fishner, J. M.;
Fitz-Axen, M.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Font, J. A.;
Forsyth, P. W. F.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Ganija, M. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garcia, A.;
Garc\'{\ı, C.;
Garufi, a-Quirós} F.;
Gateley, B.;
Gaudio, S.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, D.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giacomazzo, B.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Gill, K.;
Giordano, G.;
Glover, L.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Goncharov, B.;
González, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Green, R.;
Gretarsson, E. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Gruning, P.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Gulati, H. K.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Halim, O.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, E. Z.;
Hamilton, H. F.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hannuksela, O. A.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Hernandez, F. J.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hinderer, T.;
Hoak, D.;
Hochheim, S.;
Hofman, D.;
Holland, N. A.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horst, C.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hreibi, A.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Hulko, M.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Iess, A.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, C.;
Inta, R.;
Intini, G.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Johnson, D. S.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kamai, B.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katolik, M.;
Katsanevas, S.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kawabe, K.;
Keerthana, N. V.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kemball, A. J.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khamesra, B.;
Khan, H.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, W. S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinley-Hanlon, M.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Knowles, T. D.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Krämer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kumar, S.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Kwang, S.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Lai, K. H.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, H. W.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Li, X.;
Linker, S. D.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Liu, X.;
Lo, R. K. L.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
London, L. T.;
Longo, A.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
Lück, H.;
Lumaca, D.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macas, R.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Hernandez, I. Maga\ na;
na-Sandoval, F. Maga\;
Zertuche, L. Maga\ na;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markakis, C.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Markowitz, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marquina, A.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Massera, E.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCann, J. J.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McCuller, L.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Mejuto-Villa, E.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Mereni, L.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Mills, J.;
Milovich-Goff, M. C.;
Minazzoli, O.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moffa, D.;
Mogushi, K.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morisaki, S.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
niz, E. A. Mu\;
Muratore, M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nagar, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Neilson, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Nevin, L.;
Newport, J. M.;
Ng, K. Y.;
Ng, S.;
Nguyen, P.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nichols, D.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
North, C.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Obergaulinger, M.;
Oberling, J.;
OBrien, B. D.;
ODea, G. D.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Ohta, H.;
Okada, M. A.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
OŔeilly, B.;
Ormiston, R.;
Ortega, L. F.;
OŚhaughnessy, R.;
Ossokine, S.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Pagano, G.;
Page, J.;
Page, M. A.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, Howard;
Pan, Huang-Wei;
Pang, B.;
Pang, P. T. H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parida, A.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patil, M.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedersen, C.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Phukon, K. S.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pirello, M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E. K.;
Possenti, L.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Pratten, G.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rajbhandari, B.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramirez, K. E.;
Ramos-Buades, A.;
Rana, Javed;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ren, W.;
Ricci, F.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Robson, T.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romel, C. L.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Ross, M. P.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Rutins, G.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sanchez, L. E.;
Sanchis-Gual, N.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sarin, N.;
Sassolas, B.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheel, M.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schönbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schulte, B. W.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Seidel, E.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shah, A. A.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaner, M. B.;
Shao, L.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shen, H.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slaven-Blair, T. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Somala, S.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staats, K.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Steltner, B.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stocks, D.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D. J.;
Strain, K. A.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Strunk, A.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Suresh, J.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Tait, S. C.;
Talbot, C.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tápai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Tasson, J. D.;
Taylor, J. A.;
Taylor, R.;
Tewari, S. V.;
Theeg, T.;
Thies, F.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres-Forné, A.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Töyrä, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tsang, K. W.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Tsuna, D.;
Tsukada, L.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ueno, K.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walet, R.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, J. Z.;
Wang, W. H.;
Wang, Y. F.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wellmann, F.;
Wen, L.;
Wessel, E. K.;
We{ß, P.;
Westerweck, els} J.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Wilken, D.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Wofford, J. K.;
Wong, W. K.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wysocki, D. M.;
Xiao, S.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, L.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yazback, M.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zelenova, T.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, J.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y. -H.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zimmerman, A. B.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Weinberg, Nevin N.
Submitted: 2018-08-26, last modified: 2018-09-19
We analyze the impact of a proposed tidal instability coupling $p$-modes and
$g$-modes within neutron stars on GW170817. This non-resonant instability
transfers energy from the orbit of the binary to internal modes of the stars,
accelerating the gravitational-wave driven inspiral. We model the impact of
this instability on the phasing of the gravitational wave signal using three
parameters per star: an overall amplitude, a saturation frequency, and a
spectral index. Incorporating these additional parameters, we compute the Bayes
Factor ($\ln B^{pg}_{!pg}$) comparing our $p$-$g$ model to a standard one. We
find that the observed signal is consistent with waveform models that neglect
$p$-$g$ effects, with $\ln B^{pg}_{!pg} = 0.03^{+0.70}_{-0.58}$ (maximum a
posteriori and 90% credible region). By injecting simulated signals that do not
include $p$-$g$ effects and recovering them with the $p$-$g$ model, we show
that there is a $\simeq 50\%$ probability of obtaining similar $\ln
B^{pg}_{!pg}$ even when $p$-$g$ effects are absent. We find that the $p$-$g$
amplitude for 1.4 $M_\odot$ neutron stars is constrained to $\lesssim
\text{few}\times10^{-7}$, with maxima a posteriori near $\sim 10^{-7}$ and
$p$-$g$ saturation frequency $\sim 70\, \mathrm{Hz}$. This suggests that there
are less than a few hundred excited modes, assuming they all saturate by wave
breaking. For comparison, theoretical upper bounds suggest a $p$-$g$ amplitude
$\lesssim 10^{-6}$ and $\lesssim 10^{3}$ modes saturating by wave breaking.
Thus, the measured constraints only rule out extreme values of the $p$-$g$
parameters. They also imply that the instability dissipates $\lesssim 10^{51}\,
\mathrm{ergs}$ over the entire inspiral, i.e., less than a few percent of the
energy radiated as gravitational waves.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.10270 [pdf] - 1737518
Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift?
Submitted: 2018-05-25, last modified: 2018-08-21
We explore the ability of gravitational-wave detectors to extract the
redshift distribution of binary black hole (BBH) mergers. The evolution of the
merger rate across redshifts $0 < z \lesssim 1$ is directly tied to the
formation and evolutionary processes, providing insight regarding the
progenitor formation rate together with the distribution of time delays between
formation and merger. Because the limiting distance to which BBHs are detected
depends on the masses of the binary, the redshift distribution of detected
binaries depends on their underlying mass distribution. We therefore consider
the mass and redshift distributions simultaneously, and fit the merger rate
density, ${dN}/{dm_1\,dm_2\,dz}$. Our constraints on the mass distribution
agree with previously published results, including evidence for an upper mass
cutoff at $\sim 40 \ M_\odot$. Additionally, we show that the current set of
six BBH detections are consistent with a merger rate density that is uniform in
comoving volume. Although our constraints on the redshift distribution are not
yet tight enough to distinguish between BBH formation channels, we show that it
will be possible to distinguish between different astrophysically motivated
models of the merger rate evolution with $\sim 100$--$300$ LIGO-Virgo
detections (to be expected within 2--5 years). Specifically, we will be able to
infer whether the formation rate peaks at higher or lower redshifts than the
star formation rate, or the typical time delay between formation and merger.
Meanwhile, with $\sim 100$ detections, the inferred redshift distribution will
place constraints on more exotic scenarios such as modified gravity.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.08160 [pdf] - 1728863
Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817
Submitted: 2018-01-24, last modified: 2018-07-17
The observation of GW170817 in both gravitational and electromagnetic waves
provides a number of unique tests of general relativity. One question we can
answer with this event is: Do large-wavelength gravitational waves and
short-frequency photons experience the same number of spacetime dimensions? In
models that include additional non-compact spacetime dimensions, as the
gravitational waves propagate, they "leak" into the extra dimensions, leading
to a reduction in the amplitude of the observed gravitational waves, and a
commensurate systematic error in the inferred distance to the gravitational
wave source. Electromagnetic waves would remain unaffected. We compare the
inferred distance to GW170817 from the observation of gravitational waves,
$d_L^\mathrm{GW}$, with the inferred distance to the electromagnetic
counterpart NGC 4993, $d_L^\mathrm{EM}$. We constrain $d_L^\mathrm{GW} =
(d_L^\mathrm{EM}/\mathrm{Mpc})^\mathrm{\gamma}$ with $\gamma =
1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.05}$ (for the SHoES value of $H_0$) or $\gamma =
0.99^{+0.03}_{-0.05}$ (for the Planck value of $H_0$), where all values are MAP
and minimal 68% credible intervals. These constraints imply that gravitational
waves propagate in $D=3+1$ spacetime dimensions, as expected in general
relativity. In particular, we find that $D = 4.02^{+0.07}_{-0.10}$ (SHoES) and
$D = 3.98^{+0.07}_{-0.09}$ (Planck). Furthermore, we place limits on the
screening scale for theories with $D>4$ spacetime dimensions, finding that the
screening scale must be greater than $\sim 20$ Mpc. We also place a lower limit
on the lifetime of the graviton of $t > 4.50 \times 10^8$ yr.
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.06531 [pdf] - 1781063
A 2 per cent Hubble constant measurement from standard sirens within 5
years
Submitted: 2017-12-18, last modified: 2018-07-06
Gravitational wave coalescence events provide an entirely new way to
determine the Hubble constant, with the absolute distance calibration provided
by the theory of general relativity. This standard siren method was utilized to
measure the Hubble constant using LIGO-Virgo's detection of the binary
neutron-star merger GW170817, as well as optical identifications of the host
galaxy, NGC 4993. The novel and independent measurement is of particular
interest given the existing tension between the value of the Hubble constant
determined using Type Ia supernovae via the local distance ladder ($73.24 \pm
1.74$) and that from Cosmic Microwave Background observations ($66.93 \pm
0.62$) by $\sim 3$ sigma. Local distance ladder observations may achieve a
precision of $1\%$ within 5 years, but at present there are no indications that
further observations will substantially reduce the existing discrepancies. In
addition to clarifying the discrepancy between existing low and high-redshift
measurements, a precision measurement of the Hubble constant is of crucial
value in elucidating the nature of the dark energy. Here we show that LIGO and
Virgo can be expected to constrain the Hubble constant to a precision of
$\sim2\%$ within 5 years and $\sim1\%$ within a decade.
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.01943 [pdf] - 1703222
Explaining LIGO's observations via isolated binary evolution with natal
kicks
Submitted: 2017-09-06, last modified: 2018-06-20
We compare binary evolution models with different assumptions about
black-hole natal kicks to the first gravitational-wave observations performed
by the LIGO detectors. Our comparisons attempt to reconcile merger rate,
masses, spins, and spin-orbit misalignments of all current observations with
state-of-the-art formation scenarios of binary black holes formed in isolation.
We estimate that black holes (BHs) should receive natal kicks at birth of the
order of $\sigma\simeq 200$ (50) km/s if tidal processes do (not) realign
stellar spins. Our estimate is driven by two simple factors. The natal kick
dispersion $\sigma$ is bounded from above because large kicks disrupt too many
binaries (reducing the merger rate below the observed value). Conversely, the
natal kick distribution is bounded from below because modest kicks are needed
to produce a range of spin-orbit misalignments. A distribution of misalignments
increases our models' compatibility with LIGO's observations, if all BHs are
likely to have natal spins. Unlike related work which adopts a concrete BH
natal spin prescription, we explore a range of possible BH natal spin
distributions. Within the context of our models, for all of the choices of
$\sigma$ used here and within the context of one simple fiducial parameterized
spin distribution, observations favor low BH natal spin.
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.06080 [pdf] - 1648816
A Precise Distance to the Host Galaxy of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
GW170817 Using Surface Brightness Fluctuations
Cantiello, Michele;
Jensen, J. B.;
Blakeslee, J. P.;
Berger, E.;
Levan, A. J.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Raimondo, G.;
Brocato, E.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Branchesi, M.;
Cano, Z.;
Chornock, R.;
Covino, S.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Fong, W.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Grado, A.;
Hjorth, J.;
Holz, D. E.;
Lyman, J. D.;
Mandel, I.;
Margutti, R.;
Nicholl, M.;
Villar, V. A.;
Williams, P. K. G.
Submitted: 2018-01-18, last modified: 2018-02-27
The joint detection of gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from
the binary neutron star (BNS) merger GW170817 has provided unprecedented
insight into a wide range of physical processes: heavy element synthesis via
the $r$-process; the production of relativistic ejecta; the equation of state
of neutron stars and the nature of the merger remnant; the binary coalescence
timescale; and a measurement of the Hubble constant via the "standard siren"
technique. In detail, all of these results depend on the distance to the host
galaxy of the merger event, NGC4993. In this paper we measure the surface
brightness fluctuation (SBF) distance to NGC4993 in the F110W and F160W
passbands of the Wide Field Camera 3 Infrared Channel on the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST). For the preferred F110W passband we derive a distance modulus
of $m{-}M=33.05\pm0.08\pm0.10$ mag, or a linear distance $d=40.7\pm1.4\pm1.9$
Mpc (random and systematic errors, respectively); a virtually identical result
is obtained from the F160W data. This is the most precise distance to NGC4993
available to date. Combining our distance measurement with the corrected
recession velocity of NGC4993 implies a Hubble constant $H_0=71.9\pm
7.1~km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$. A comparison of our result to the GW-inferred value of
$H_0$ indicates a binary orbital inclination of $i\,{\gtrsim}\,137~\deg$. The
SBF technique can be applied to early-type host galaxies of BNS mergers to
${\sim\,}100$ Mpc with HST and possibly as far as ${\sim\,}300$ Mpc with the
James Webb Space Telescope, thereby helping to break the inherent
distance-inclination degeneracy of the GW signals at distances where many
future BNS mergers are likely to be detected.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.08584 [pdf] - 1606272
Where are LIGO's Big Black Holes?
Submitted: 2017-09-25, last modified: 2017-11-28
In LIGO's O1 and O2 observational runs, the detectors were sensitive to
stellar mass binary black hole coalescences with component masses up to
$100\,M_\odot$, with binaries with primary masses above $40\,M_\odot$
representing $\gtrsim90\%$ of the total accessible sensitive volume.
Nonetheless, of the 5.9 detections (GW150914, LVT151012, GW151226, GW170104,
GW170608, GW170814) reported by LIGO-Virgo, the most massive binary detected
was GW150914 with a primary component mass of $\sim36\,M_\odot$, far below the
detection mass limit. Furthermore, there are theoretical arguments in favor of
an upper mass gap, predicting an absence of black holes in the mass range
$50\lesssim M\lesssim135\,M_\odot$. We argue that the absence of detected
binary systems with component masses heavier than $\sim40\,M_\odot$ may be
preliminary evidence for this upper mass gap. By allowing for the presence of a
mass gap, we find weaker constraints on the shape of the underlying mass
distribution of binary black holes. We fit a power-law distribution with an
upper mass cutoff to real and simulated BBH mass measurements, finding that the
first 3.9 BBHs favor shallow power law slopes $\alpha \lesssim 3$ and an upper
mass cutoff $M_\mathrm{max} \sim 40\,M_\odot$. This inferred distribution is
entirely consistent with the two recently reported detections, GW170608 and
GW170814. We show that with $\sim10$ additional LIGO-Virgo BBH detections,
fitting the BH mass distribution will provide strong evidence for an upper mass
gap if one exists.
[79]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05458 [pdf] - 1589774
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. VII. Properties of the Host Galaxy and Constraints on
the Merger Timescale
Blanchard, P. K.;
Berger, E.;
Fong, W.;
Nicholl, M.;
Leja, J.;
Conroy, C.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Margutti, R.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Doctor, Z.;
Chornock, R.;
Villar, V. A.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the properties of NGC 4993, the host galaxy of GW170817, the first
gravitational wave (GW) event from the merger of a binary neutron star (BNS)
system and the first with an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart. We use both
archival photometry and new optical/near-IR imaging and spectroscopy, together
with stellar population synthesis models to infer the global properties of the
host galaxy. We infer a star formation history peaked at $\gtrsim 10$ Gyr ago,
with subsequent exponential decline leading to a low current star formation
rate of 0.01 M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, which we convert into a binary merger
timescale probability distribution. We find a median merger timescale of
$11.2^{+0.7}_{-1.4}$ Gyr, with a 90% confidence range of $6.8-13.6$ Gyr. This
in turn indicates an initial binary separation of $\approx 4.5$ R$_{\odot}$,
comparable to the inferred values for Galactic BNS systems. We also use new and
archival $Hubble$ $Space$ $Telescope$ images to measure a projected offset of
the optical counterpart of $2.1$ kpc (0.64$r_{e}$) from the center of NGC 4993
and to place a limit of $M_{r} \gtrsim -7.2$ mag on any pre-existing emission,
which rules out the brighter half of the globular cluster luminosity function.
Finally, the age and offset of the system indicates it experienced a modest
natal kick with an upper limit of $\sim 200$ km s$^{-1}$. Future GW$-$EM
observations of BNS mergers will enable measurement of their population delay
time distribution, which will directly inform their viability as the dominant
source of $r$-process enrichment in the Universe.
[80]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05431 [pdf] - 1589749
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. V. Rising X-ray Emission from an Off-Axis Jet
Margutti, Raffaella;
Berger, E.;
Fong, W.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Chornock, R.;
Efterkari, T.;
Nicholl, M.;
Villar, V. A.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Annis, J.;
Brown, D. A.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Doctor, Z.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Sako, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We report the discovery of rising X-ray emission from the binary neutron star
(BNS) merger event GW170817. This is the first detection of X-ray emission from
a gravitational-wave source. Observations acquired with the Chandra X-ray
Observatory (CXO) at t~2.3 days post merger reveal no significant emission,
with L_x<=3.2x10^38 erg/s (isotropic-equivalent). Continued monitoring revealed
the presence of an X-ray source that brightened with time, reaching L_x\sim
9x10^39 erg/s at ~15.1 days post merger. We interpret these findings in the
context of isotropic and collimated relativistic outflows (both on- and
off-axis). We find that the broad-band X-ray to radio observations are
consistent with emission from a relativistic jet with kinetic energy
E_k~10^49-10^50 erg, viewed off-axis with theta_obs~ 20-40 deg. Our models
favor a circumbinary density n~ 0.0001-0.01 cm-3, depending on the value of the
microphysical parameter epsilon_B=10^{-4}-10^{-2}. A central-engine origin of
the X-ray emission is unlikely. Future X-ray observations at $t\gtrsim 100$
days, when the target will be observable again with the CXO, will provide
additional constraints to solve the model degeneracies and test our
predictions. Our inferences on theta_obs are testable with gravitational wave
information on GW170817 from Advanced LIGO/Virgo on the binary inclination.
[81]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05438 [pdf] - 1589756
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. VIII. A Comparison to Cosmological Short-duration
Gamma-ray Bursts
Fong, W.;
Berger, E.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Margutti, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Chornock, R.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Villar, V. A.;
Nicholl, M.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Holz, D. E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present a comprehensive comparison of the properties of the radio through
X-ray counterpart of GW170817 and the properties of short-duration gamma-ray
bursts (GRBs). For this effort, we utilize a sample of 36 short GRBs spanning a
redshift range of $z \approx 0.12-2.6$ discovered over 2004-2017. We find that
the counterpart to GW170817 has an isotropic-equivalent luminosity that is
$\approx 3000$ times less than the median value of on-axis short GRB X-ray
afterglows, and $\gtrsim10^{4}$ times less than that for detected short GRB
radio afterglows. Moreover, the allowed jet energies and particle densities
inferred from the radio and X-ray counterparts to GW170817 and on-axis short
GRB afterglows are remarkably similar, suggesting that viewing angle effects
are the dominant, and perhaps only, difference in their observed radio and
X-ray behavior. From comparison to previous claimed kilonovae following short
GRBs, we find that the optical and near-IR counterpart to GW170817 is
comparatively under-luminous by a factor of $\approx 3-5$, indicating a range
of kilonova luminosities and timescales. A comparison of the optical limits
following short GRBs on $\lesssim 1$ day timescales also rules out a "blue"
kilonova of comparable optical isotropic-equivalent luminosity in one previous
short GRB. Finally, we investigate the host galaxy of GW170817, NGC4993, in the
context of short GRB host galaxy stellar population properties. We find that
NGC4993 is superlative in terms of its large luminosity, old stellar population
age, and low star formation rate compared to previous short GRB hosts.
Additional events within the Advanced LIGO/VIRGO volume will be crucial in
delineating the properties of the host galaxies of NS-NS mergers, and
connecting them to their cosmological counterparts.
[82]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05845 [pdf] - 1614847
How Many Kilonovae Can Be Found in Past, Present, and Future Survey
Datasets?
Scolnic, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Brout, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Herner, K.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Sako, M.;
Doctor, Z.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Holz, D. E.;
Berger, E.;
Chornock, R.;
Villar, V. A.;
Nicholl, M.;
Biswas, R.;
Hounsell, R.;
Foley, R. J.;
Metzger, J.;
Rest, A.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Möller, A.;
Nugent, P.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Collaboration, DES
Submitted: 2017-10-16
The discovery of a kilonova (KN) associated with the Advanced LIGO
(aLIGO)/Virgo event GW170817 opens up new avenues of multi-messenger
astrophysics. Here, using realistic simulations, we provide estimates of the
number of KNe that could be found in data from past, present and future surveys
without a gravitational-wave trigger. For the simulation, we construct a
spectral time-series model based on the DES-GW multi-band light-curve from the
single known KN event, and we use an average of BNS rates from past studies of
$10^3 \rm{Gpc}^{-3}/\rm{year}$, consistent with the $1$ event found so far.
Examining past and current datasets from transient surveys, the number of KNe
we expect to find for ASAS-SN, SDSS, PS1, SNLS, DES, and SMT is between 0 and
$0.3$. We predict the number of detections per future survey to be: 8.3 from
ATLAS, 10.6 from ZTF, 5.5/69 from LSST (the Deep Drilling / Wide Fast Deep),
and 16.0 from WFIRST. The maximum redshift of KNe discovered for each survey is
z = 0.8 for WFIRST, z = 0.25 for LSST and z = 0.04 for ZTF and ATLAS. For the
LSST survey, we also provide contamination estimates from Type Ia and
Core-collapse supernovae: after light-curve and template-matching requirements,
we estimate a background of just 2 events. More broadly, we stress that future
transient surveys should consider how to optimize their search strategies to
improve their detection efficiency, and to consider similar analyses for GW
follow-up programs.
[83]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05456 [pdf] - 1589772
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. III. Optical and UV Spectra of a Blue Kilonova From Fast
Polar Ejecta
Nicholl, M.;
Berger, E.;
Kasen, D.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Elias, J.;
Briceno, C.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Chornock, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Villar, V. A.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Brown, W.;
Annis, J.;
Bahramian, A.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Clemens, J. C.;
Dennihy, E.;
Dunlap, B.;
Holz, D. E.;
Marchesini, E.;
Massaro, F.;
Moskowitz, N.;
Pelisoli, I.;
Rest, A.;
Ricci, F.;
Sako, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Strader, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present optical and ultraviolet spectra of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave (GW) source, the binary neutron star merger
GW170817. Spectra were obtained nightly between 1.5 and 9.5 days post-merger,
using the SOAR and Magellan telescopes; the UV spectrum was obtained with the
\textit{Hubble Space Telescope} at 5.5 days. Our data reveal a rapidly-fading
blue component ($T\approx5500$ K at 1.5 days) that quickly reddens; spectra
later than $\gtrsim 4.5$ days peak beyond the optical regime. The spectra are
mostly featureless, although we identify a possible weak emission line at $\sim
7900$ \AA\ at $t\lesssim 4.5$ days. The colours, rapid evolution and
featureless spectrum are consistent with a "blue" kilonova from polar ejecta
comprised mainly of light $r$-process nuclei with atomic mass number $A\lesssim
140$. This indicates a sight-line within $\theta_{\rm obs}\lesssim 45^{\circ}$
of the orbital axis. Comparison to models suggests $\sim0.03$ M$_\odot$ of blue
ejecta, with a velocity of $\sim 0.3c$. The required lanthanide fraction is
$\sim 10^{-4}$, but this drops to $<10^{-5}$ in the outermost ejecta. The large
velocities point to a dynamical origin, rather than a disk wind, for this blue
component, suggesting that both binary constituents are neutron stars (as
opposed to a binary consisting of a neutron star and a black hole). For
dynamical ejecta, the high mass favors a small neutron star radius of $\lesssim
12$ km. This mass also supports the idea that neutron star mergers are a major
contributor to $r$-process nucleosynthesis.
[85]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05459 [pdf] - 1589775
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical
Counterpart
Soares-Santos, M.;
Holz, D. E.;
Annis, J.;
Chornock, R.;
Herner, K.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Lin, H.;
Scolnic, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Neilsen, E.;
Marriner, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Blanchard, P.;
Brown, D. A.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E. R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Durret, F.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S . S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hanna, C.;
Kasen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Medina, G. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Muir, J.;
Nicholl, M.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stebbins, A.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
post-merger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours post-merger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
-15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multi-messenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitational-wave sources.
[86]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05457 [pdf] - 1589773
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. VI. Radio Constraints on a Relativistic Jet and
Predictions for Late-Time Emission from the Kilonova Ejecta
Alexander, K. D.;
Berger, E.;
Fong, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Margutti, R.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Annis, J.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Chornock, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Drout, M.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Frieman, J.;
Holz, D. E.;
Nicholl, M.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Villar, V. A.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present Very Large Array (VLA) and Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter
Array ALMA radio observations of GW\,170817, the first Laser Interferometer
Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO)/Virgo gravitational wave (GW) event from
a binary neutron star merger and the first GW event with an electromagnetic
(EM) counterpart. Our data include the first observations following the
discovery of the optical transient at both the centimeter ($13.7$ hours post
merger) and millimeter ($2.41$ days post merger) bands. We detect faint
emission at 6 GHz at 19.47 and 39.23 days after the merger, but not in an
earlier observation at 2.46 d. We do not detect cm/mm emission at the position
of the optical counterpart at frequencies of 10-97.5 GHz at times ranging from
0.6 to 30 days post merger, ruling out an on-axis short gamma-ray burst (SGRB)
for energies $\gtrsim 10^{48}$ erg. For fiducial SGRB parameters, our limits
require an observer viewer angle of $\gtrsim 20^{\circ}$. The radio and X-ray
data can be jointly explained as the afterglow emission from an SGRB with a jet
energy of $\sim 10^{49}-10^{50}$ erg that exploded in a uniform density
environment with $n\sim 10^{-4}-10^{-2}$ cm$^{-3}$, viewed at an angle of $\sim
20^{\circ}-40^{\circ}$ from the jet axis. Using the results of our light curve
and spectral modeling, in conjunction with the inference of the circumbinary
density, we predict the emergence of late-time radio emission from the
deceleration of the kilonova (KN) ejecta on a timescale of $\sim 5-10$ years
that will remain detectable for decades with next-generation radio facilities,
making GW\,170817 a compelling target for long-term radio monitoring.
[87]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05454 [pdf] - 1589770
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. IV. Detection of Near-infrared Signatures of r-process
Nucleosynthesis with Gemini-South
Chornock, R.;
Berger, E.;
Kasen, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Villar, V. A.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Drout, M. R.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Holz, D. E.;
Matheson, T.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Smith, N.;
Soares-Santos, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present a near-infrared spectral sequence of the electromagnetic
counterpart to the binary neutron star merger GW170817 detected by Advanced
LIGO/Virgo. Our dataset comprises seven epochs of J+H spectra taken with
FLAMINGOS-2 on Gemini-South between 1.5 and 10.5 days after the merger. In the
initial epoch, the spectrum is dominated by a smooth blue continuum due to a
high-velocity, lanthanide-poor blue kilonova component. Starting the following
night, all subsequent spectra instead show features that are similar to those
predicted in model spectra of material with a high concentration of
lanthanides, including spectral peaks near 1.07 and 1.55 microns. Our fiducial
model with 0.04 M_sun of ejecta, an ejection velocity of v=0.1c, and a
lanthanide concentration of X_lan=1e-2 provides a good match to the spectra
taken in the first five days, although it over-predicts the late-time fluxes.
We also explore models with multiple fitting components, in each case finding
that a significant abundance of lanthanide elements is necessary to match the
broad spectral peaks that we observe starting at 2.5 d after the merger. These
data provide direct evidence that binary neutron star mergers are significant
production sites of even the heaviest r-process elements.
[88]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05840 [pdf] - 1589828
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-IR Light Curves and Comparison
to Kilonova Models
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Villar, V. A.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Chornock, R.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Guillochon, J.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen,, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Palmese, A.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Smith, N.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Balbinot, E.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Cook, E. R.;
Durret, F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Medina, G. E.;
Muir, J.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wester, W.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present UV, optical, and NIR photometry of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave source from Advanced LIGO/Virgo, the binary
neutron star merger GW170817. Our data set extends from the discovery of the
optical counterpart at $0.47$ days to $18.5$ days post-merger, and includes
observations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), Gemini-South/FLAMINGOS-2
(GS/F2), and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). The spectral energy
distribution (SED) inferred from this photometry at $0.6$ days is well
described by a blackbody model with $T\approx 8300$ K, a radius of $R\approx
4.5\times 10^{14}$ cm (corresponding to an expansion velocity of $v\approx
0.3c$), and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\approx 5\times10^{41}$ erg
s$^{-1}$. At $1.5$ days we find a multi-component SED across the optical and
NIR, and subsequently we observe rapid fading in the UV and blue optical bands
and significant reddening of the optical/NIR colors. Modeling the entire data
set we find that models with heating from radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni, or
those with only a single component of opacity from $r$-process elements, fail
to capture the rapid optical decline and red optical/NIR colors. Instead,
models with two components consistent with lanthanide-poor and lanthanide-rich
ejecta provide a good fit to the data, the resulting "blue" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.01$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.3$c, and the "red" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.04$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.1$c. These ejecta masses are broadly
consistent with the estimated $r$-process production rate required to explain
the Milky Way $r$-process abundances, providing the first evidence that BNS
mergers can be a dominant site of $r$-process enrichment.
[90]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.08079 [pdf] - 1588780
Distance measures in gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology
Submitted: 2017-09-23
We present quantities which characterize the sensitivity of
gravitational-wave observatories to sources at cosmological distances. In
particular, we introduce and generalize the horizon, range, response, and reach
distances. These quantities incorporate a number of important effects,
including cosmologically well-defined distances and volumes, cosmological
redshift, cosmological time dilation, and rate density evolution. In addition,
these quantities incorporate unique aspects of gravitational wave detectors,
such as the variable sky sensitivity of the detectors and the scaling of the
sensitivity with inverse distance. An online calculator
(http://gwc.rcc.uchicago.edu) and python notebook
(https://github.com/hsinyuc/distancetool) to determine GW distances are
available. We provide answers to the question: "How far can gravitational-wave
detectors hear?"
[91]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07896 [pdf] - 1637526
Using spin to understand the formation of LIGO's black holes
Submitted: 2017-09-22
With the detection of four candidate binary black hole (BBH) mergers by the
Advanced LIGO detectors thus far, it is becoming possible to constrain the
properties of the BBH merger population in order to better understand the
formation of these systems. Black hole (BH) spin orientations are one of the
cleanest discriminators of formation history, with BHs in dynamically formed
binaries in dense stellar environments expected to have spins distributed
isotropically, in contrast to isolated populations where stellar evolution is
expected to induce BH spins preferentially aligned with the orbital angular
momentum. In this work we propose a simple, model-agnostic approach to
characterizing the spin properties of LIGO's BBH population. Using measurements
of the effective spin of the binaries, which is LIGO's best constrained spin
parameter, we introduce a simple parameter to quantify the fraction of the
population that is isotropically distributed, regardless of the spin magnitude
distribution of the population. Once the orientation characteristics of the
population have been determined, we show how measurements of effective spin can
be used to directly constrain the underlying BH spin magnitude distribution.
Although we find that the majority of the current effective spin measurements
are too small to be informative, with LIGO's four BBH candidates we find a
slight preference for an underlying population with aligned spins over one with
isotropic spins (with an odds ratio of 1.1). We argue that it will be possible
to distinguish symmetric and anti-symmetric populations at high confidence with
tens of additional detections, although mixed populations may take
significantly more detections to disentangle. We also derive preliminary spin
magnitude distributions for LIGO's black holes, under the assumption of aligned
or isotropic populations.
[94]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07947 [pdf] - 1580686
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts During
the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run and Implications for the Origin of GRB
150906B
LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
IPN Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
D'alya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.
Submitted: 2016-11-23, last modified: 2017-06-21
We present the results of the search for gravitational waves (GWs) associated
with $\gamma$-ray bursts detected during the first observing run of the
Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). We find no
evidence of a GW signal for any of the 41 $\gamma$-ray bursts for which LIGO
data are available with sufficient duration. For all $\gamma$-ray bursts, we
place lower bounds on the distance to the source using the optimistic
assumption that GWs with an energy of $10^{-2}M_\odot c^2$ were emitted within
the $16$-$500\,$Hz band, and we find a median 90% confidence limit of 71$\,$Mpc
at 150$\,$Hz. For the subset of 19 short/hard $\gamma$-ray bursts, we place
lower bounds on distance with a median 90% confidence limit of 90$\,$Mpc for
binary neutron star (BNS) coalescences, and 150 and 139$\,$Mpc for neutron
star-black hole coalescences with spins aligned to the orbital angular momentum
and in a generic configuration, respectively. These are the highest distance
limits ever achieved by GW searches. We also discuss in detail the results of
the search for GWs associated with GRB 150906B, an event that was localized by
the InterPlanetary Network near the local galaxy NGC 3313, which is at a
luminosity distance of 54$\,$Mpc ($z=0.0124$). Assuming the $\gamma$-ray
emission is beamed with a jet half-opening angle $\leq 30^{\circ}$, we exclude
a BNS and a neutron star-black hole in NGC 3313 as the progenitor of this event
with confidence $>99$%. Further, we exclude such progenitors up to a distance
of 102$\,$Mpc and 170$\,$Mpc, respectively.
[95]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.05408 [pdf] - 1611885
Statistical Gravitational Waveform Models: What to Simulate Next?
Submitted: 2017-06-16
Models of gravitational waveforms play a critical role in detecting and
characterizing the gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binary coalescences.
Waveforms from numerical relativity (NR), while highly accurate, are too
computationally expensive to produce to be directly used with Bayesian
parameter estimation tools like Markov-chain-Monte-Carlo and nested sampling.
We propose a Gaussian process regression (GPR) method to generate accurate
reduced-order-model waveforms based only on existing accurate (e.g. NR)
simulations. Using a training set of simulated waveforms, our GPR approach
produces interpolated waveforms along with uncertainties across the parameter
space. As a proof of concept, we use a training set of IMRPhenomD waveforms to
build a GPR model in the 2-d parameter space of mass ratio $q$ and
equal-and-aligned spin $\chi_1=\chi_2$. Using a regular, equally-spaced grid of
120 IMRPhenomD training waveforms in $q\in[1,3]$ and $\chi_1 \in [-0.5,0.5]$,
the GPR mean approximates IMRPhenomD in this space to mismatches below
$4.3\times 10^{-5}$. Our approach can alternatively use training waveforms
directly from numerical relativity. Beyond interpolation of waveforms, we also
present a greedy algorithm that utilizes the errors provided by our GPR model
to optimize the placement of future simulations. In a fiducial test case we
find that using the greedy algorithm to iteratively add simulations achieves
GPR errors that are $\sim 1$ order of magnitude lower than the errors from
using Latin-hypercube or square training grids.
[96]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.06869 [pdf] - 1582026
Are LIGO's Black Holes Made From Smaller Black Holes?
Submitted: 2017-03-20, last modified: 2017-06-01
One proposed formation channel for stellar mass black holes (BHs) is through
hierarchical mergers of smaller BHs. Repeated mergers between comparable mass
BHs leave an imprint on the spin of the resulting BH, since the final BH spin
is largely determined by the orbital angular momentum of the binary. We find
that for stellar mass BHs forming hierarchically the distribution of spin
magnitudes is universal, with a peak at $a \sim 0.7$ and little support below
$a \sim 0.5$. We show that the spin distribution is robust against changes to
the mass ratio of the merging binaries, the initial spin distribution of the
first generation of BHs, and the number of merger generations. While we assume
an isotropic distribution of initial spin directions, spins that are
preferentially aligned or antialigned do not qualitatively change our results.
We also consider a "cluster catastrophe" model for BH formation in which we
allow for mergers of arbitrary mass ratios and show that this scenario predicts
a unique spin distribution that is similar to the universal distribution
derived for major majors. We explore the ability of spin measurements from
ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors to constrain hierarchical merger
scenarios. We apply a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model to mock GW data and
argue that the fraction of BHs that formed through hierarchical mergers will be
constrained with $\mathcal{O}(100)$ LIGO binary black hole detections, while
with $\mathcal{O}(10)$ detections we could falsify a model in which all
component BHs form hierarchically.
[98]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07531 [pdf] - 1563964
Effects of waveform model systematics on the interpretation of GW150914
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Boyle, M.;
Chu, T.;
Hemberger, D.;
Hinder, I.;
Kidder, L. E.;
Ossokine, S.;
Scheel, M.;
Szilagyi, B.;
Teukolsky, S.;
Vano-Vinuales, A.
Submitted: 2016-11-22, last modified: 2017-04-18
Parameter estimates of GW150914 were obtained using Bayesian inference, based
on three semi-analytic waveform models for binary black hole coalescences.
These waveform models differ from each other in their treatment of black hole
spins, and all three models make some simplifying assumptions, notably to
neglect sub-dominant waveform harmonic modes and orbital eccentricity.
Furthermore, while the models are calibrated to agree with waveforms obtained
by full numerical solutions of Einstein's equations, any such calibration is
accurate only to some non-zero tolerance and is limited by the accuracy of the
underlying phenomenology, availability, quality, and parameter-space coverage
of numerical simulations. This paper complements the original analyses of
GW150914 with an investigation of the effects of possible systematic errors in
the waveform models on estimates of its source parameters. To test for
systematic errors we repeat the original Bayesian analyses on mock signals from
numerical simulations of a series of binary configurations with parameters
similar to those found for GW150914. Overall, we find no evidence for a
systematic bias relative to the statistical error of the original parameter
recovery of GW150914 due to modeling approximations or modeling inaccuracies.
However, parameter biases are found to occur for some configurations disfavored
by the data of GW150914: for binaries inclined edge-on to the detector over a
small range of choices of polarization angles, and also for eccentricities
greater than $\sim$0.05. For signals with higher signal-to-noise ratio than
GW150914, or in other regions of the binary parameter space (lower masses,
larger mass ratios, or higher spins), we expect that systematic errors in
current waveform models may impact gravitational-wave measurements, making more
accurate models desirable for future observations.
[99]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.08052 [pdf] - 1545467
A Search for Kilonovae in the Dark Energy Survey
Doctor, Z.;
Kessler, R.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kim, A. G.;
Morganson, E.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Spinka, H.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
DAndrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2016-11-23, last modified: 2017-03-10
The coalescence of a binary neutron star (BNS) pair is expected to produce
gravitational waves (GW) and electromagnetic (EM) radiation, both of which may
be detectable with currently available instruments. We describe a search for a
theoretically predicted r-process optical transient from these mergers, dubbed
the kilonova (KN), using griz broadband data from the Dark Energy Survey
Supernova Program (DES-SN). Some models predict KNe to be redder,
shorter-lived, and dimmer than supernovae (SNe), but at present the event rate
of KNe is poorly constrained. We simulate observations of KN and SN light
curves with the Monte-Carlo simulation code SNANA to optimize selection
requirements, determine search efficiency, and predict SN backgrounds. We also
perform an analysis using fake point sources on images to account for anomalous
efficiency losses from difference-imaging on bright low-redshift galaxies. Our
analysis of the first two seasons of DES-SN data results in 0 events, and is
consistent with our prediction of 1.1 background events based on simulations of
SN. Given our simulation prediction, there is a 33 percent chance of finding 0
events in the data. Assuming no underlying galaxy flux, our search sets 90
percent upper limits on the KN volumetric rate of $1.0\times10^7$ Gpc$^{-3}$
yr$^{-1}$ for the dimmest KN model we consider (peak i-band absolute magnitude
$M_i=-11.4$ mag) and $2.4\times10^4$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ for the brightest
($M_i=-16.2$ mag). Accounting for efficiency loss from host galaxy Poisson
noise, these limits are 1.1 times higher; accounting for anomalous subtraction
artifacts on bright galaxies, these limits are ~3 times higher. While previous
KN searches were based on triggered follow-up, this analysis is the first
untriggered optical KN search and informs selection requirements and strategies
for future KN searches and GW follow-up observations.
[100]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03845 [pdf] - 1557663
Calibration of the Advanced LIGO detectors for the discovery of the
binary black-hole merger GW150914
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Altin, P. A.;
Amariutei, D. V.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Behnke, B.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C. J.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergman, J.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Biwer, C.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bohe, A.;
Bojtos, P.;
Bond, C.;
Bork, R.;
Bose, S.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Brau, J. E.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Buonanno, A.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Callister, T.;
Camp, J. B.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cepeda, C.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, C.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Danzmann, K.;
Darman, N. S.;
Dave, I.;
Daveloza, H. P.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
DeBra, D.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M. C.;
Di Palma, I.;
Dojcinoski, G.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Engels, W.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Fletcher, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A. G.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Gaur, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Ghosh, A.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gordon, N. A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Green, A. C.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hollitt, S. E.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huang, S.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isi, M.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jang, H.;
Jani, K.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kehl, M. S.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, J.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Krueger, C.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kuo, L.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lenon, A.;
Leong, J. R.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B. M.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lormand, M.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Luo, J.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R. M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Miao, H.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Mukund, K. N.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D. J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nedkova, K.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nitz, A.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Patrick, Z.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Pereira, R.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S. S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Raymond, V.;
Read, J.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sandeen, B.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Schilling, R.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schönbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Serna, G.;
Sevigny, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strauss, N. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Szczepańczyk, M. J.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tápai, M.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Töyrä, D.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifirò, D.;
Tse, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Weßels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, G.;
Yablon, J.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, H.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, F.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2016-02-11, last modified: 2017-02-28
In Advanced LIGO, detection and astrophysical source parameter estimation of
the binary black hole merger GW150914 requires a calibrated estimate of the
gravitational-wave strain sensed by the detectors. Producing an estimate from
each detector's differential arm length control loop readout signals requires
applying time domain filters, which are designed from a frequency domain model
of the detector's gravitational-wave response. The gravitational-wave response
model is determined by the detector's opto-mechanical response and the
properties of its feedback control system. The measurements used to validate
the model and characterize its uncertainty are derived primarily from a
dedicated photon radiation pressure actuator, with cross-checks provided by
optical and radio frequency references. We describe how the gravitational-wave
readout signal is calibrated into equivalent gravitational-wave-induced strain
and how the statistical uncertainties and systematic errors are assessed.
Detector data collected over 38 calendar days, from September 12 to October 20,
2015, contain the event GW150914 and approximately 16 of coincident data used
to estimate the event false alarm probability. The calibration uncertainty is
less than 10% in magnitude and 10 degrees in phase across the relevant
frequency band 20 Hz to 1 kHz.
[101]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02030 [pdf] - 1553952
Directional limits on persistent gravitational waves from Advanced
LIGO's first observing run
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Biscoveanu, A. S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campbell, W.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, E.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matas, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schlassa, S.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, D.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2016-12-06, last modified: 2017-01-30
We employ gravitational-wave radiometry to map the gravitational waves
stochastic background expected from a variety of contributing mechanisms and
test the assumption of isotropy using data from Advanced LIGO's first observing
run. We also search for persistent gravitational waves from point sources with
only minimal assumptions over the 20 - 1726 Hz frequency band. Finding no
evidence of gravitational waves from either point sources or a stochastic
background, we set limits at 90% confidence. For broadband point sources, we
report upper limits on the gravitational wave energy flux per unit frequency in
the range $F_{\alpha,\Theta}(f) < (0.1 - 56) \times 10^{-8}$ erg cm$^{-2}$
s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$ (f/25 Hz)$^{\alpha-1}$ depending on the sky location
$\Theta$ and the spectral power index $\alpha$. For extended sources, we report
upper limits on the fractional gravitational wave energy density required to
close the Universe of $\Omega(f,\Theta) < (0.39-7.6) \times 10^{-8}$ sr$^{-1}$
(f/25 Hz)$^\alpha$ depending on $\Theta$ and $\alpha$. Directed searches for
narrowband gravitational waves from astrophysically interesting objects
(Scorpius X-1, Supernova 1987 A, and the Galactic Center) yield median
frequency-dependent limits on strain amplitude of $h_0 <$ (6.7, 5.5, and 7.0)
$\times 10^{-25}$ respectively, at the most sensitive detector frequencies
between 130 - 175 Hz. This represents a mean improvement of a factor of 2
across the band compared to previous searches of this kind for these sky
locations, considering the different quantities of strain constrained in each
case.
[102]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.6330 [pdf] - 1530153
Detecting Ancient Supernovae at z ~ 5 - 12 with CLASH
Submitted: 2013-12-21, last modified: 2017-01-17
Supernovae are important probes of the properties of stars at high redshifts
because they can be detected at early epochs and their masses can be inferred
from their light curves. Finding the first cosmic explosions in the universe
will only be possible with the James Webb Space Telescope, the Wide-Field
Infrared Survey Telescope and the next generation of extremely large
telescopes. But strong gravitational lensing by massive clusters, like those in
the Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble (CLASH), could reveal such
events now by magnifying their flux by factors of 10 or more. We find that
CLASH will likely discover at least 2 - 3 core-collapse supernovae at 5 < z <
12 and perhaps as many as ten. Future surveys of cluster lenses similar in
scope to CLASH by the James Webb Space Telescope might find hundreds of these
events out to z ~ 15 - 17. Besides revealing the masses of early stars, these
ancient supernovae will also constrain cosmic star formation rates in the era
of first galaxy formation.
[103]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.01471 [pdf] - 1527310
Finding the One: Identifying the Host Galaxies of Gravitational-Wave
Sources
Submitted: 2016-12-05
We explore the localization of compact binary coalescences with ground-based
gravitational-wave detector networks. We simulate tens of thousands of binary
events, and present the distributions of localization sky areas and
localization volumes for a range of sources and network configurations. We show
that generically there exists a tail of particularly well-localized events,
with 2D and 3D localizations of $<10\,\mbox{deg}^2$ and $<1000\,\mbox{Mpc}^3$
achievable, respectively, starting in LIGO/Virgo's third observing run.
Incorporating estimates for the galaxy density and the binary event rates, we
argue that future gravitational-wave detector networks will localize a small
number of binary systems per year to a sufficiently small volume that the
unique host galaxy might be identified. For these golden events, which are
generally the closest and loudest ones, the gravitational-wave detector
networks will point (in 3D; the length of the finger matters) directly at the
source. This will allow for studies of the properties of the host galaxies of
compact binary mergers, which may be an important component in exploring the
formation channels of these sources. In addition, since the host will provide
an independent measurement of the redshift, this will allow the use of the
event as a standard siren to measure cosmology. Furthermore, identification of
a small number of host galaxies can enable deep follow-up searches for
associated electromagnetic transients.
[105]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.04242 [pdf] - 1485104
Supplement: Going the Distance: Mapping Host Galaxies of LIGO and Virgo
Sources in Three Dimensions Using Local Cosmography and Targeted Follow-up
Singer, L. P.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Holz, D. E.;
Farr, W. M.;
Price, L. R.;
Raymond, V.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Nissanke, S.;
Coughlin, M.;
Farr, B.;
Urban, Alex L.;
Vitale, S.;
Veitch, J.;
Graff, P.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Mohapatra, S.;
Mandel, I.
Submitted: 2016-05-13, last modified: 2016-09-22
This is a supplement to the Letter of Singer et al.
(https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07333), in which we demonstrated a rapid algorithm
for obtaining joint 3D estimates of sky location and luminosity distance from
observations of binary neutron star mergers with Advanced LIGO and Virgo. We
argued that combining the reconstructed volumes with positions and redshifts of
possible host galaxies can provide large-aperture but small field of view
instruments with a manageable list of targets to search for optical or infrared
emission. In this Supplement, we document the new HEALPix-based file format for
3D localizations of gravitational-wave transients. We include Python sample
code to show the reader how to perform simple manipulations of the 3D sky maps
and extract ranked lists of likely host galaxies. Finally, we include
mathematical details of the rapid volume reconstruction algorithm.
[106]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.07333 [pdf] - 1488869
Going the Distance: Mapping Host Galaxies of LIGO and Virgo Sources in
Three Dimensions Using Local Cosmography and Targeted Follow-up
Singer, L. P.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Holz, D. E.;
Farr, W. M.;
Price, L. R.;
Raymond, V.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Nissanke, S.;
Coughlin, M.;
Farr, B.;
Urban, Alex L.;
Vitale, S.;
Veitch, J.;
Graff, P.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Mohapatra, S.;
Mandel, I.
Submitted: 2016-03-23, last modified: 2016-09-22
The Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO)
discovered gravitational waves (GWs) from a binary black hole merger in 2015
September and may soon observe signals from neutron star mergers. There is
considerable interest in searching for their faint and rapidly fading
electromagnetic (EM) counterparts, though GW position uncertainties are as
coarse as hundreds of square degrees. Because LIGO's sensitivity to binary
neutron stars is limited to the local universe, the area on the sky that must
be searched could be reduced by weighting positions by mass, luminosity, or
star formation in nearby galaxies. Since GW observations provide information
about luminosity distance, combining the reconstructed volume with positions
and redshifts of galaxies could reduce the area even more dramatically. A key
missing ingredient has been a rapid GW parameter estimation algorithm that
reconstructs the full distribution of sky location and distance. We demonstrate
the first such algorithm, which takes under a minute, fast enough to enable
immediate EM follow-up. By combining the three-dimensional posterior with a
galaxy catalog, we can reduce the number of galaxies that could conceivably
host the event by a factor of 1.4, the total exposure time for the Swift X-ray
Telescope by a factor of 2, the total exposure time for a synoptic optical
survey by a factor of 2, and the total exposure time for a narrow-field optical
telescope by a factor of 3. This encourages us to suggest a new role for small
field of view optical instruments in performing targeted searches of the most
massive galaxies within the reconstructed volumes.
[107]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.03842 [pdf] - 1526842
The Rate of Binary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO
Observations Surrounding GW150914
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C. J.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergman, J.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bohe, A.;
Bojtos, P.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, C.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Conti, L.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Darman, N. S.;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Daveloza, H. P.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dojcinoski, G.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Engels, W.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A. G.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gatto, A.;
Gaur, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gordon, N. A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Hollitt, S. E.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huang, S.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jang, H.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Kehl, M. S.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, J.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, Nam-Gyu;
Kim, Namjun;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Krueger, C.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B. M.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Luo, J.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R. M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D. J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nedkova, K.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Patrick, Z.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Porter, E.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S. S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sandeen, B.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Schilling, R.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Serna, G.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Sevigny, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strauss, N. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, G.;
Yablon, J.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, H.;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, F.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S. E.;
Zweizig, J.
Submitted: 2016-02-11, last modified: 2016-09-20
A transient gravitational-wave signal, GW150914, was identified in the twin
Advanced LIGO detectors on September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC. To assess the
implications of this discovery, the detectors remained in operation with
unchanged configurations over a period of 39 d around the time of the signal.
At the detection statistic threshold corresponding to that observed for
GW150914, our search of the 16 days of simultaneous two-detector observational
data is estimated to have a false alarm rate (FAR) of $< 4.9 \times 10^{-6} \,
\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, yielding a $p$-value for GW150914 of $< 2 \times 10^{-7}$.
Parameter estimation followup on this trigger identifies its source as a binary
black hole (BBH) merger with component masses $(m_1, m_2) =
\left(36^{+5}_{-4},29^{+4}_{-4}\right) \, M_\odot$ at redshift $z =
0.09^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ (median and 90\% credible range). Here we report on the
constraints these observations place on the rate of BBH coalescences.
Considering only GW150914, assuming that all BBHs in the Universe have the same
masses and spins as this event, imposing a search FAR threshold of 1 per 100
years, and assuming that the BBH merger rate is constant in the comoving frame,
we infer a 90% credible range of merger rates between $2$--$53 \,
\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ (comoving frame). Incorporating all search
triggers that pass a much lower threshold while accounting for the uncertainty
in the astrophysical origin of each trigger, we estimate a higher rate, ranging
from $13$--$600 \, \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ depending on assumptions
about the BBH mass distribution. All together, our various rate estimates fall
in the conservative range $2$--$600 \, \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3} \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$.
[110]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04538 [pdf] - 1477626
A DECam Search for an Optical Counterpart to the LIGO Gravitational Wave
Event GW151226
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chornock, R.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fox, D. B.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Lin, H.;
Margutti, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Neilsen, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, N.;
Sobreira, F.;
Strampelli, G. M.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-06-14, last modified: 2016-09-08
We report the results of a Dark Energy Camera (DECam) optical follow-up of
the gravitational wave (GW) event GW151226, discovered by the Advanced LIGO
detectors. Our observations cover 28.8 deg$^2$ of the localization region in
the $i$ and $z$ bands (containing 3% of the BAYESTAR localization probability),
starting 10 hours after the event was announced and spanning four epochs at
$2-24$ days after the GW detection. We achieve $5\sigma$ point-source limiting
magnitudes of $i\approx21.7$ and $z\approx21.5$, with a scatter of $0.4$ mag,
in our difference images. Given the two day delay, we search this area for a
rapidly declining optical counterpart with $\gtrsim 3\sigma$ significance
steady decline between the first and final observations. We recover four
sources that pass our selection criteria, of which three are cataloged AGN. The
fourth source is offset by $5.8$ arcsec from the center of a galaxy at a
distance of 187 Mpc, exhibits a rapid decline by $0.5$ mag over $4$ days, and
has a red color of $i-z\approx 0.3$ mag. These properties roughly match the
expectations for a kilonova. However, this source was detected several times,
starting $94$ days prior to GW151226, in the Pan-STARRS Survey for Transients
(dubbed as PS15cdi) and is therefore unrelated to the GW event. Given its
long-term behavior, PS15cdi is likely a Type IIP supernova that transitioned
out of its plateau phase during our observations, mimicking a kilonova-like
behavior. We comment on the implications of this detection for contamination in
future optical follow-up observations.
[111]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.00164 [pdf] - 1531158
Observational Selection Effects with Ground-based Gravitational Wave
Detectors
Submitted: 2016-07-30
Ground-based interferometers are not perfectly all-sky instruments, and it is
important to account for their behavior when considering the distribution of
detected events. In particular, the LIGO detectors are most sensitive to
sources above North America and the Indian Ocean and, as the Earth rotates, the
sensitive regions are swept across the sky. However, because the detectors do
not acquire data uniformly over time, there is a net bias on detectable
sources' right ascensions. Both LIGO detectors preferentially collect data
during their local night; it is more than twice as likely to be local midnight
than noon when both detectors are operating. We discuss these selection effects
and how they impact LIGO's observations and electromagnetic follow-up. Beyond
galactic foregrounds associated with seasonal variations, we find that
equatorial observatories can access over $80\%$ of the localization
probability, while mid-latitudes will access closer to $70\%$. Facilities
located near the two LIGO sites can observe sources closer to their zenith than
their analogs in the South, but the average observation will still be no closer
than $44^\circ$ from zenith. We also find that observatories in Africa or the
South Atlantic will wait systematically longer before they can begin observing
compared to the rest of the world, although there is a preference for
longitudes near the LIGOs. These effects, along with knowledge of the LIGO
antenna pattern, can inform electromagnetic follow-up activities and
optimization, including the possibility of directing observations even before
gravitational-wave events occur.
[115]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.03116 [pdf] - 1498338
The Effect of Pair-Instability Mass Loss on Black Hole Mergers
Belczynski, K.;
Heger, A.;
Gladysz, W.;
Ruiter, A. J.;
Woosley, S.;
Wiktorowicz, G.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Bulik, T.;
O'Shaughnesy, R.;
Holz, D. E.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Berti, E.
Submitted: 2016-07-11
Mergers of two stellar origin black holes are a prime source of gravitational
waves and are under intensive investigations. One crucial ingredient in their
modeling has so far been neglected. Pair-instability pulsation supernovae with
associated severe mass loss may suppress formation of massive black holes,
decreasing black hole merger rates for the highest black hole masses.
The mass loss associated with pair-instability pulsation supernovae limits
the Population I/II stellar-origin black hole mass to 50 Msun, in tension with
earlier predictions that the maximum black hole mass could be as high as 100
Msun.
Suppression of double black hole merger rates by pair-instability pulsation
supernovae is negligible for our evolutionary channel. Our standard
evolutionary model with inclusion of pair-instability pulsation supernovae and
with pair-instability supernovae is fully consistent with the LIGO detections
of black hole mergers: GW150914, GW151226 and LVT151012. The LIGO observations
seem to exclude high (>400 km/s) BH natal kicks. We predict the detection of
several up to 60 BH-BH mergers with total mass 10--150 Msun (most likely range:
20--80 Msun) in the forthcoming 60 effective days of LIGO O2 observations.
[118]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04531 [pdf] - 1436300
The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two
40-100 Msun stars
Submitted: 2016-02-14, last modified: 2016-06-22
The merger of two massive 30 Msun black holes has been detected in
gravitational waves (1,GW150914). This discovery validates recent predictions
(2-4) that massive binary black holes would constitute the first detection.
However, previous calculations have not sampled the relevant binary black hole
progenitors---massive, low-metallicity binary stars---with sufficient accuracy
and input physics to enable robust predictions to better than several orders of
magnitude (5-10). Here we report a suite of high-precision numerical
simulations of binary black hole formation via the evolution of isolated binary
stars, providing a framework to interpret GW150914 and predict the properties
of subsequent binary black hole gravitational-wave events. Our models imply
that these events form in an environment where the metallicity is less than 10
percent of solar; have initial masses of 40-100 Msun; and interact through mass
transfer and a common envelope phase. Their progenitors likely form either at 2
Gyr, or somewhat less likely, at 11 Gyr after the Big Bang. Most binary black
holes form without supernova explosions, and their spins are nearly unchanged
since birth, but do not have to be parallel. The classical field formation of
binary black holes proposed in this study, with low natal kicks and restricted
common envelope evolution, produces 40 times more binary black holes than
dynamical formation channels involving globular clusters (11) and is comparable
to the rate from homogeneous evolution channels (12-15). Our calculations
predict detections of about 1,000 black hole mergers per year with total mass
of 20-80 Msun once second generation ground-based gravitational wave
observatories reach full sensitivity.
[121]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.01262 [pdf] - 1483368
Directly comparing GW150914 with numerical solutions of Einstein's
equations for binary black hole coalescence
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Bejger, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bohe, A.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, C.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Conti, L.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Darman, N. S.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Engels, W.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Fenyvesi, E.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H. A. G.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Geng, P.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gordon, N. A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huang, S.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jang, H.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jian, L.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Kapadia, S. J.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Kehl, M. S.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chi-Woong;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Krueger, C.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Lewis, J. B.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Zertuche, L. Magaña;
Magee, R. M.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D. J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Nedkova, K.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Patrick, Z.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sandeen, B.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O. E. S.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Schilling, R.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strauss, N. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yablon, J.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yu, H.;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Boyle, M.;
Campanelli, M.;
Chu, T.;
Clark, M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E.;
Fong, H.;
Hannam, M.;
Healy, J.;
Hemberger, D.;
Hinder, I.;
Husa, S.;
Kalaghati, C.;
Khan, S.;
Kidder, L. E.;
Kinsey, M.;
Laguna, P.;
London, L. T.;
Lousto, C. O.;
Lovelace, G.;
Ossokine, S.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Scheel, M.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Szilagyi, B.;
Teukolsky, S.;
Vinuales, A. Vano;
Zlochower, Y.
Submitted: 2016-06-03
We compare GW150914 directly to simulations of coalescing binary black holes
in full general relativity, accounting for all the spin-weighted quadrupolar
modes, and separately accounting for all the quadrupolar and octopolar modes.
Consistent with the posterior distributions reported in LVC_PE[1] (at 90%
confidence), we find the data are compatible with a wide range of nonprecessing
and precessing simulations. Followup simulations performed using
previously-estimated binary parameters most resemble the data. Comparisons
including only the quadrupolar modes constrain the total redshifted mass Mz \in
[64 - 82M_\odot], mass ratio q = m2/m1 \in [0.6,1], and effective aligned spin
\chi_eff \in [-0.3, 0.2], where \chi_{eff} = (S1/m1 + S2/m2) \cdot\hat{L} /M.
Including both quadrupolar and octopolar modes, we find the mass ratio is even
more tightly constrained. Simulations with extreme mass ratios and effective
spins are highly inconsistent with the data, at any mass. Several nonprecessing
and precessing simulations with similar mass ratio and \chi_{eff} are
consistent with the data. Though correlated, the components' spins (both in
magnitude and directions) are not significantly constrained by the data. For
nonprecessing binaries, interpolating between simulations, we reconstruct a
posterior distribution consistent with previous results. The final black hole's
redshifted mass is consistent with Mf,z between 64.0 - 73.5M_\odot and the
final black hole's dimensionless spin parameter is consistent with af = 0.62 -
0.73. As our approach invokes no intermediate approximations to general
relativity and can strongly reject binaries whose radiation is inconsistent
with the data, our analysis provides a valuable complement to LVC_PE[1].
[126]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.04615 [pdf] - 1385385
Compact Binary Merger Rates: Comparison with LIGO/Virgo Upper Limits
Submitted: 2015-10-13, last modified: 2016-03-27
We compare evolutionary predictions of double compact object merger rate
densities with initial and forthcoming LIGO/Virgo upper limits. We find that:
(i) Due to the cosmological reach of advanced detectors, current conversion
methods of population synthesis predictions into merger rate densities are
insufficient. (ii) Our optimistic models are a factor of 18 below the initial
LIGO/Virgo upper limits for BH-BH systems, indicating that a modest increase in
observational sensitivity (by a factor of 2.5) may bring the first detections
or first gravitational wave constraints on binary evolution. (iii)
Stellar-origin massive BH-BH mergers should dominate event rates in advanced
LIGO/Virgo and can be detected out to redshift z=2 with templates including
inspiral, merger, and ringdown. Normal stars (<150 Msun) can produce such
mergers with total redshifted mass up to 400 Msun. (iv) High black hole natal
kicks can severely limit the formation of massive BH-BH systems (both in
isolated binary and in dynamical dense cluster evolution), and thus would
eliminate detection of these systems even at full advanced LIGO/Virgo
sensitivity. We find that low and high black hole natal kicks are allowed by
current observational electromagnetic constraints. (v) The majority of our
models yield detections of all types of mergers (NS-NS, BH-NS, BH-BH) with
advanced detectors. Numerous massive BH-BH merger detections will indicate
small (if any) natal kicks for massive BHs.
[127]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.07336 [pdf] - 1371991
Cosmic variance in the nanohertz gravitational wave background
Submitted: 2015-08-28, last modified: 2016-03-09
We use large N-body simulations and empirical scaling relations between dark
matter halos, galaxies, and supermassive black holes to estimate the formation
rates of supermassive black hole binaries and the resulting low-frequency
stochastic gravitational wave background (GWB). We find this GWB to be
relatively insensitive ($\lesssim10\%$) to cosmological parameters, with only
slight variation between WMAP5 and Planck cosmologies. We find that uncertainty
in the astrophysical scaling relations changes the amplitude of the GWB by a
factor of $\sim 2$. Current observational limits are already constraining this
predicted range of models. We investigate the Poisson variance in the amplitude
of the GWB for randomly-generated populations of supermassive black holes,
finding a scatter of order unity per frequency bin below 10 nHz, and increasing
to a factor of $\sim 10$ near 100 nHz. This variance is a result of the rarity
of the most massive binaries, which dominate the signal, and acts as a
fundamental uncertainty on the amplitude of the underlying power law spectrum.
This Poisson uncertainty dominates at $\gtrsim 20$ nHz, while at lower
frequencies the dominant uncertainty is related to our poor understanding of
the astrophysical scaling relations, although very low frequencies may be
dominated by uncertainties related to the final parsec problem and the
processes which drive binaries to the gravitational wave dominated regime.
Cosmological effects are negligible at all frequencies.
[128]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04198 [pdf] - 1418777
A Dark Energy Camera Search for an Optical Counterpart to the First
Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Soares-Santos, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Berger, E.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Chen, H.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Sobreira, F.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brown, D. A.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chornock, R.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fernandez, E.;
Fischer, J.;
Fong, W.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fox, D. B.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Karliner, I.;
Kasen, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Margutti, R.;
Martini, P.;
Matheson, T.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Peoples, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Quataert, E.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, N.;
Smith, R. C.;
Stebbins, A.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-02-18
We report initial results of a deep search for an optical counterpart to the
gravitational wave event GW150914, the first trigger from the Advanced LIGO
gravitational wave detectors. We used the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) to image a
102 deg$^2$ area, corresponding to 38% of the initial trigger high-probability
sky region and to 11% of the revised high-probability region. We observed in i
and z bands at 4-5, 7, and 24 days after the trigger. The median $5\sigma$
point-source limiting magnitudes of our search images are i=22.5 and z=21.8
mag. We processed the images through a difference-imaging pipeline using
templates from pre-existing Dark Energy Survey data and publicly available
DECam data. Due to missing template observations and other losses, our
effective search area subtends 40 deg$^{2}$, corresponding to 12% total
probability in the initial map and 3% of the final map. In this area, we search
for objects that decline significantly between days 4-5 and day 7, and are
undetectable by day 24, finding none to typical magnitude limits of i=
21.5,21.1,20.1 for object colors (i-z)=1,0,-1, respectively. Our search
demonstrates the feasibility of a dedicated search program with DECam and bodes
well for future research in this emerging field.
[130]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.04199 [pdf] - 1418778
A Dark Energy Camera Search for Missing Supergiants in the LMC After the
Advanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Annis, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Chornock, R.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, N.;
Sobreira, F.;
Walker, A. R.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Fischer, J.;
Fong, W.;
Fosalba, P.;
Fox, D. B.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Karliner, I.;
Kasen, D.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Martini, P.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Ogando, R.;
Peoples, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Quataert, E.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Stebbins, A.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2016-02-12, last modified: 2016-02-18
The collapse of the core of a star is expected to produce gravitational
radiation. While this process will usually produce a luminous supernova, the
optical signatue could be subluminous and a direct collapse to a black hole,
with the star just disappearing, is possible. The gravitational wave event
GW150914 reported by the LIGO Virgo Collaboration (LVC) on 2015 September 16,
was detected by a burst analysis and whose high probability spatial
localization included the Large Magellanic Cloud. Shortly after the
announcement of the event, we used the Dark Energy Camera to observe 102
deg$^2$ of the localization area, including a 38 deg$^2$ area centered on the
LMC. Using a catalog of 152 LMC luminous red supergiants, candidates to undergo
a core collapse without a visible supernova, we find that the positions of 144
of these are inside our images, and that all are detected - none have
disappeared. There are other classes of candidates: we searched existing
catalogs of red supergiants, yellow supergiants, Wolf-Rayet stars, and luminous
blue variable stars, recovering all that were inside the imaging area. Based on
our observations, we conclude that it is unlikely that GW150914 was caused by
the core collapse of a supergiant in the LMC, consistent with the LIGO
Collaboration analyses of the gravitational wave form as best described by a
binary black hole merger. We discuss how to generalize this search for future
very nearby core collapse candidates.
[131]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.00055 [pdf] - 1781046
Facilitating follow-up of LIGO-Virgo events using rapid sky localization
Submitted: 2015-08-31
Fast and effective localization of gravitational wave (GW) events could play
a crucial role in identifying possible electromagnetic counterparts, and
thereby help usher in an era of GW multi-messenger astronomy. We discuss an
algorithm for accurate and very low latency ($<$ 1 second) localization of GW
sources using only the relative times of arrival, relative phases, and relative
signal-to-noise ratios for pairs of detectors. The algorithm is independent of
distances and masses to leading order, and can be generalized to all discrete
sources detected by ground-based detector networks. Our approach, while
developed independently, is similar to that of BAYESTAR with a few
modifications in the algorithm which result in increased computational
efficiency. For the LIGO two detector configuration (Hanford+Livingston)
expected in late 2015 we find a median 50\% (90\%) localization of 143 deg$^2$
(558 deg$^2$) for binary neutron stars (for network SNR threshold of 12,
corresponding to a horizon distance of $\sim 130$ Mpc), consistent with
previous findings. We explore the improvement in localization resulting from
high SNR events, finding that the loudest out of the first 4 (or 10) events
reduces the median sky localization area by a factor of 1.9 (3.0) for the case
of 2 GW detectors, and 2.2 (4.0) for 3 detectors. We consider the case of
multi-messenger joint detections in both the GW and the electromagnetic (EM)
spectra. We specifically explore the case of independent, and possibly highly
uncertain, localizations, showing that the joint localization area is
significantly reduced. We also show that a prior on the binary inclination,
potentially arising from GRB observations, has a negligible effect on GW
localization. Our algorithm is simple, fast, and accurate, and may be of
particular utility in the development of multi-messenger astronomy.
[132]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.7016 [pdf] - 1241724
Double Compact Objects III: Gravitational Wave Detection Rates
Submitted: 2014-05-27, last modified: 2015-07-05
The unprecedented range of second-generation gravitational-wave (GW)
observatories calls for refining the predictions of potential sources and
detection rates. The coalescence of double compact objects (DCOs)---i.e.,
neutron star-neutron star (NS-NS), black hole-neutron star (BH-NS), and black
hole-black hole (BH-BH) binary systems---is the most promising source of GWs
for these detectors. We compute detection rates of coalescing DCOs in
second-generation GW detectors using the latest models for their cosmological
evolution, and implementing inspiral-merger-ringdown (IMR) gravitational
waveform models in our signal-to-noise ratio calculations. We find that: (1)
the inclusion of the merger/ringdown portion of the signal does not
significantly affect rates for NS-NS and BH-NS systems, but it boosts rates by
a factor $\sim 1.5$ for BH-BH systems; (2) in almost all of our models BH-BH
systems yield by far the largest rates, followed by NS-NS and BH-NS systems,
respectively, and (3) a majority of the detectable BH-BH systems were formed in
the early Universe in low-metallicity environments. We make predictions for the
distributions of detected binaries and discuss what the first GW detections
will teach us about the astrophysics underlying binary formation and evolution.
[133]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.03179 [pdf] - 1245699
Neutron stars versus black holes: probing the mass gap with LIGO/Virgo
Submitted: 2015-03-11, last modified: 2015-06-16
Inspirals and mergers of black hole (BHs) and/or neutron star (NSs) binaries
are expected to be abundant sources for ground-based gravitational-wave (GW)
detectors. We assess the capabilities of Advanced LIGO and Virgo to measure
component masses using inspiral waveform models including spin-precession
effects using a large ensemble of GW sources {\bf randomly oriented and
distributed uniformly in volume. For 1000 sources this yields signal-to-noise
ratios between 7 and 200}. We make quantitative predictions for how well LIGO
and Virgo will distinguish between BHs and NSs and appraise the prospect of
using LIGO/Virgo observations to definitively confirm, or reject, the existence
of a putative "mass gap" between NSs ($m\leq3\ M_\odot$) and BHs ($m\geq 5\
M_\odot$). We find sources with the smaller mass component satisfying $m_2
\lesssim1.5\ M_\odot$ to be unambiguously identified as containing at least one
NS, while systems with $m_2\gtrsim6\ M_\odot$ will be confirmed binary BHs.
Binary BHs with $m_2<5\ M_\odot$ (i.e., in the gap) cannot generically be
distinguished from NSBH binaries. High-mass NSs ($2<m<3$ $M_\odot$) are often
consistent with low-mass BH ($m<5\ M_\odot$), posing a challenge for
determining the maximum NS mass from LIGO/Virgo observations alone. Individual
sources will seldom be measured well enough to confirm objects in the mass gap
and statistical inferences drawn from the detected population will be strongly
dependent on the underlying distribution. If nature happens to provide a mass
distribution with the populations relatively cleanly separated in chirp mass
space, as some population synthesis models suggest, then NSs and BHs are more
easily distinguishable.
[134]
oai:arXiv.org:1409.0522 [pdf] - 864179
The Loudest Gravitational Wave Events
Submitted: 2014-09-01, last modified: 2014-09-04
As first emphasized by Bernard Schutz, there exists a universal distribution
of signal-to-noise ratios for gravitational wave detection. Because
gravitational waves (GWs) are almost impossible to obscure via dust absorption
or other astrophysical processes, the strength of the detected signal is
dictated solely by the emission strength and the distance to the source.
Assuming that the space density of an arbitrary population of GW sources does
not evolve, we show explicitly that the distribution of detected
signal-to-noise (SNR) values depends solely on the detection threshold; it is
independent of the detector network (interferometer or pulsar timing array),
the individual detector noise curves (initial or Advanced LIGO), the nature of
the GW sources (compact binary coalescence, supernova, or some other discrete
source), and the distributions of source variables (only non-spinning neutron
stars of mass exactly $1.4\,M_\odot$ or a complicated distribution of masses
and spins). We derive the SNR distribution for each individual detector within
a network as a function of the relative detector orientations and
sensitivities. While most detections will have SNR near the detection
threshold, there will be a tail of events to higher SNR. We derive the SNR
distribution of the loudest (highest SNR) events in any given sample of
detections. We find that the median SNR of the loudest out of the first four
events should have an $\mbox{SNR}=22$ (for a threshold of 12, appropriate for
the Advanced LIGO/Virgo network), increasing to a median value for the loudest
SNR of 47 for 40 detections. We expect these loudest events to provide
particularly powerful constraints on their source parameters, and they will
play an important role in extracting astrophysics from gravitational wave
sources. These distributions also offer an important internal calibration of
the response of the GW detector networks.
[135]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.5382 [pdf] - 1366180
Distance Probes of Dark Energy
Kim, A.;
Padmanabhan, N.;
Aldering, G.;
Allen, S.;
Baltay, C.;
Cahn, R.;
D'Andrea, C.;
Dalal, N.;
Dawson, K.;
Denney, K.;
Eisenstein, D.;
Finley, D.;
Freedman, W.;
Ho, S.;
Holz, D.;
Kent, A.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Linder, E.;
Martini, P.;
Nugent, P.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Peterson, B.;
Riess, A.;
Rubin, D.;
Sako, M.;
Suntzeff, N.;
Suzuki, N.;
Thomas, R.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.;
Woosley, S.
Submitted: 2013-09-20, last modified: 2014-07-18
This document presents the results from the Distances subgroup of the Cosmic
Frontier Community Planning Study (Snowmass 2013). We summarize the current
state of the field as well as future prospects and challenges. In addition to
the established probes using Type IA supernovae and baryon acoustic
oscillations, we also consider prospective methods based on clusters, active
galactic nuclei, gravitational wave sirens and strong lensing time delays.
[136]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.2600 [pdf] - 849569
Dark Sky Simulations: Early Data Release
Submitted: 2014-07-09
The Dark Sky Simulations are an ongoing series of cosmological N-body
simulations designed to provide a quantitative and accessible model of the
evolution of the large-scale Universe. Such models are essential for many
aspects of the study of dark matter and dark energy, since we lack a
sufficiently accurate analytic model of non-linear gravitational clustering. In
July 2014, we made available to the general community our early data release,
consisting of over 55 Terabytes of simulation data products, including our
largest simulation to date, which used $1.07 \times 10^{12}~(10240^3)$
particles in a volume $8h^{-1}\mathrm{Gpc}$ across. Our simulations were
performed with 2HOT, a purely tree-based adaptive N-body method, running on
200,000 processors of the Titan supercomputer, with data analysis enabled by
yt. We provide an overview of the derived halo catalogs, mass function, power
spectra and light cone data. We show self-consistency in the mass function and
mass power spectrum at the 1% level over a range of more than 1000 in particle
mass. We also present a novel method to distribute and access very large
datasets, based on an abstraction of the World Wide Web (WWW) as a file system,
remote memory-mapped file access semantics, and a space-filling curve index.
This method has been implemented for our data release, and provides a means to
not only query stored results such as halo catalogs, but also to design and
deploy new analysis techniques on large distributed datasets.
[137]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.0677 [pdf] - 1208144
The Formation and Gravitational-Wave Detection of Massive Stellar
Black-Hole Binaries
Submitted: 2014-03-03, last modified: 2014-05-27
If binaries consisting of two 100 Msun black holes exist they would serve as
extraordinarily powerful gravitational-wave sources, detectable to redshifts of
z=2 with the advanced LIGO/Virgo ground-based detectors. Large uncertainties
about the evolution of massive stars preclude definitive rate predictions for
mergers of these massive black holes. We show that rates as high as hundreds of
detections per year, or as low as no detections whatsoever, are both possible.
It was thought that the only way to produce these massive binaries was via
dynamical interactions in dense stellar systems. This view has been challenged
by the recent discovery of several stars with mass above 150 Msun in the R136
region of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Current models predict that when stars of
this mass leave the main sequence, their expansion is insufficient to allow
common envelope evolution to efficiently reduce the orbital separation. The
resulting black-hole--black-hole binary remains too wide to be able to coalesce
within a Hubble time. If this assessment is correct, isolated very massive
binaries do not evolve to be gravitational-wave sources. However, other
formation channels exist. For example, the high multiplicity of massive stars,
and their common formation in relatively dense stellar associations, opens up
dynamical channels for massive black hole mergers (e.g., via Kozai cycles or
repeated binary-single interactions). We identify key physical factors that
shape the population of very massive black-hole--black-hole binaries. Advanced
gravitational-wave detectors will provide important constraints on the
formation and evolution of very massive stars.
[138]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.0358 [pdf] - 774593
Comparison of LIGO/Virgo upper limits with predicted compact binary
merger rates
Submitted: 2012-08-01, last modified: 2014-01-22
We compare the current LIGO/Virgo upper limits on double compact object
volumetric merger rates with our theoretical predictions. Our optimistic models
are a factor of 3 below the existing upper limits for massive BH-BH systems
with total mass 50-70 Msun, suggesting that a small increase in observational
sensitivity may bring the first detections. The LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave
observatories are currently being upgraded to advanced design sensitivity. If a
sizeable population of BH-BH binaries is detected, the maximum total binary
mass of this population will discriminate between two general families of
common envelope models. If no binaries are detected, the new upper limits will
provide astrophysically useful information about the environment and physical
processes (e.g., metallicity of host galaxies or BH natal kicks) crucial to the
formation of binaries containing black holes. For NS-NS systems, our predicted
rates are 3 orders of magnitude below the current upper limits; even if
advanced instruments reach their design sensitivities (factors of 10 times in
distance, and 1,000 times in volumetric rate) the detection of NS-NS systems is
not assured. However, we note that although our predicted NS-NS merger rates
are consistent with estimates derived from Galactic NS-NS binaries and short
GRBs, they are on the low side of these empirical estimates.
[139]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.1546 [pdf] - 1173254
Double Compact Objects II: Cosmological Merger Rates
Submitted: 2013-08-07, last modified: 2013-12-10
The development of advanced gravitational wave (GW) observatories, such as
Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, provides impetus to refine theoretical
predictions for what these instruments might detect. In particular, with the
range increasing by an order of magnitude, the search for GW sources is
extending beyond the "local" Universe and out to cosmological distances. Double
compact objects (neutron star-neutron star (NS-NS), black hole-neutron star
(BH-NS) and black hole-black hole (BH-BH) systems) are considered to be the
most promising gravitational wave sources. In addition, NS-NS and/or BH-NS
systems are thought to be the progenitors of gamma ray bursts (GRBs), and may
also be associated with kilonovae. In this paper we present the merger event
rates of these objects as a function of cosmological redshift. We provide the
results for four cases, each one investigating a different important evolution
parameter of binary stars. Each case is also presented for two metallicity
evolution scenarios. We find that (i) in most cases NS-NS systems dominate the
merger rates in the local Universe, while BH-BH mergers dominate at high
redshift; (ii) BH-NS mergers are less frequent than other sources per unit
volume, for all time; and (iii) natal kicks may alter the observable properties
of populations in a significant way, allowing the underlying models of binary
evolution and compact object formation to be easily distinguished. This is the
second paper in a series of three. The third paper will focus on calculating
the detection rates of mergers by gravitational wave telescopes.
[140]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.4979 [pdf] - 1157955
Finding the First Cosmic Explosions I: Pair-Instability Supernovae
Whalen, Daniel J.;
Even, Wesley;
Frey, Lucille H.;
Smidt, Joseph;
Johnson, Jarrett L.;
Lovekin, C. C.;
Fryer, Chris L.;
Stiavelli, Massimo;
Holz, Daniel E.;
Heger, Alexander;
Woosley, S. E.;
Hungerford, Aimee L.
Submitted: 2012-11-21, last modified: 2013-09-05
The first stars are the key to the formation of primitive galaxies, early
cosmological reionization and chemical enrichment, and the origin of
supermassive black holes. Unfortunately, in spite of their extreme
luminosities, individual Population III stars will likely remain beyond the
reach of direct observation for decades to come. However, their properties
could be revealed by their supernova explosions, which may soon be detected by
a new generation of NIR observatories such as JWST and WFIRST. We present light
curves and spectra for Pop III pair-instability supernovae calculated with the
Los Alamos radiation hydrodynamics code RAGE. Our numerical simulations account
for the interaction of the blast with realistic circumstellar envelopes, the
opacity of the envelope, and Lyman absorption by the neutral IGM at high
redshift, all of which are crucial to computing the NIR signatures of the first
cosmic explosions. We find that JWST will detect pair-instability supernovae
out to z > 30, WFIRST will detect them in all-sky surveys out to z ~ 15 - 20
and LSST and Pan-STARRS will find them at z ~ 7 - 8. The discovery of these
ancient explosions will probe the first stellar populations and reveal the
existence of primitive galaxies that might not otherwise have been detected.
[141]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.2638 [pdf] - 691293
Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations of
merging compact binaries
Submitted: 2013-07-09
Recent observations have accumulated compelling evidence that some short
gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) are associated with the mergers of neutron star (NS)
binaries. This would indicate that the SGRB event is associated with a
gravitational-wave (GW) signal corresponding to the final inspiral of the
compact binary. In addition, the radioactive decay of elements produced in NS
binary mergers may result in transients visible in the optical and infrared
with peak luminosities on hours-days timescales. Simultaneous observations of
the inspiral GWs and signatures in the electromagnetic band may allow us to
directly and independently determine both the luminosity distance and redshift
to a binary. These standard sirens (the GW analog of standard candles) have the
potential to provide an accurate measurement of the low-redshift Hubble flow.
In addition, these systems are absolutely calibrated by general relativity, and
therefore do not experience the same set of astrophysical systematics found in
traditional standard candles, nor do the measurements rely on a distance
ladder. We show that 15 observable GW and EM events should allow the Hubble
constant to be measured with 5% precision using a network of detectors that
includes advanced LIGO and Virgo. Measuring 30 beamed GW-SGRB events could
constrain H_0 to better than 1%. When comparing to standard Gaussian likelihood
analysis, we find that each event's non-Gaussian posterior in H_0 helps reduce
the overall measurement errors in H_0 for an ensemble of NS binary mergers.
[142]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.5720 [pdf] - 667680
The Gravitational Universe
Consortium, The eLISA;
:;
Seoane, P. Amaro;
Aoudia, S.;
Audley, H.;
Auger, G.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, J.;
Barausse, E.;
Barke, S.;
Bassan, M.;
Beckmann, V.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bender, P. L.;
Berti, E.;
Binétruy, P.;
Bogenstahl, J.;
Bonvin, C.;
Bortoluzzi, D.;
Brause, N. C.;
Brossard, J.;
Buchman, S.;
Bykov, I.;
Camp, J.;
Caprini, C.;
Cavalleri, A.;
Cerdonio, M.;
Ciani, G.;
Colpi, M.;
Congedo, G.;
Conklin, J.;
Cornish, N.;
Danzmann, K.;
de Vine, G.;
DeBra, D.;
Freitag, M. Dewi;
Di Fiore, L.;
Aguilo, M. Diaz;
Diepholz, I.;
Dolesi, R.;
Dotti, M.;
Barranco, G. Fernández;
Ferraioli, L.;
Ferroni, V.;
Finetti, N.;
Fitzsimons, E.;
Gair, J.;
Galeazzi, F.;
Garcia, A.;
Gerberding, O.;
Gesa, L.;
Giardini, D.;
Gibert, F.;
Grimani, C.;
Groot, P.;
Cervantes, F. Guzman;
Haiman, Z.;
Halloin, H.;
Heinzel, G.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hogan, C.;
Holz, D.;
Hornstrup, A.;
Hoyland, D.;
Hoyle, C. D.;
Hueller, M.;
Hughes, S.;
Jetzer, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Karnesis, N.;
Kilic, M.;
Killow, C.;
Klipstein, W.;
Kochkina, E.;
Korsakova, N.;
Krolak, A.;
Larson, S.;
Lieser, M.;
Littenberg, T.;
Livas, J.;
Lloro, I.;
Mance, D.;
Madau, P.;
Maghami, P.;
Mahrdt, C.;
Marsh, T.;
Mateos, I.;
Mayer, L.;
McClelland, D.;
McKenzie, K.;
McWilliams, S.;
Merkowitz, S.;
Miller, C.;
Mitryk, S.;
Moerschell, J.;
Mohanty, S.;
Monsky, A.;
Mueller, G.;
Müller, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicolodi, D.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nofrarias, M.;
Numata, K.;
Ohme, F.;
Otto, M.;
Perreur-Lloyd, M.;
Petiteau, A.;
Phinney, E. S.;
Plagnol, E.;
Pollack, S.;
Porter, E.;
Prat, P.;
Preston, A.;
Prince, T.;
Reiche, J.;
Richstone, D.;
Robertson, D.;
Rossi, E. M.;
Rosswog, S.;
Rubbo, L.;
Ruiter, A.;
Sanjuan, J.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schutz, B.;
Schütze, D.;
Sesana, A.;
Shaddock, D.;
Shah, S.;
Sheard, B.;
Sopuerta, C. F.;
Spector, A.;
Spero, R.;
Stanga, R.;
Stebbins, R.;
Stede, G.;
Steier, F.;
Sumner, T.;
Sun, K. -X.;
Sutton, A.;
Tanaka, T.;
Tanner, D.;
Thorpe, I.;
Tröbs, M.;
Tinto, M.;
Tu, H. -B.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Vetrugno, D.;
Vitale, S.;
Volonteri, M.;
Wand, V.;
Wang, Y.;
Wanner, G.;
Ward, H.;
Ware, B.;
Wass, P.;
Weber, W. J.;
Yu, Y.;
Yunes, N.;
Zweifel, P.
Submitted: 2013-05-24
The last century has seen enormous progress in our understanding of the
Universe. We know the life cycles of stars, the structure of galaxies, the
remnants of the big bang, and have a general understanding of how the Universe
evolved. We have come remarkably far using electromagnetic radiation as our
tool for observing the Universe. However, gravity is the engine behind many of
the processes in the Universe, and much of its action is dark. Opening a
gravitational window on the Universe will let us go further than any
alternative. Gravity has its own messenger: Gravitational waves, ripples in the
fabric of spacetime. They travel essentially undisturbed and let us peer deep
into the formation of the first seed black holes, exploring redshifts as large
as z ~ 20, prior to the epoch of cosmic re-ionisation. Exquisite and
unprecedented measurements of black hole masses and spins will make it possible
to trace the history of black holes across all stages of galaxy evolution, and
at the same time constrain any deviation from the Kerr metric of General
Relativity. eLISA will be the first ever mission to study the entire Universe
with gravitational waves. eLISA is an all-sky monitor and will offer a wide
view of a dynamic cosmos using gravitational waves as new and unique messengers
to unveil The Gravitational Universe. It provides the closest ever view of the
early processes at TeV energies, has guaranteed sources in the form of
verification binaries in the Milky Way, and can probe the entire Universe, from
its smallest scales around singularities and black holes, all the way to
cosmological dimensions.
[143]
oai:arXiv.org:1211.0548 [pdf] - 1157480
Supermassive Seeds for Supermassive Black Holes
Submitted: 2012-11-02, last modified: 2013-05-18
Recent observations of quasars powered by supermassive black holes (SMBHs)
out to z > 7 constrain both the initial seed masses and the growth of the most
massive black holes (BHs) in the early universe. Here we elucidate the
implications of the radiative feedback from early generations of stars and from
BH accretion for popular models for the formation and growth of seed BHs. We
show that by properly accounting for (1) the limited role of mergers in growing
seed BHs as inferred from cosmological simulations of early star formation and
radiative feedback, (2) the sub-Eddington accretion rates of BHs expected at
the earliest times, and (3) the large radiative efficiencies (e_rad) of the
most massive BHs inferred from observations of active galactic nuclei at high
redshift (e_rad > 0.1), we are led to the conclusion that the initial BH seeds
may have been as massive as > 10^5 M_Sun. This presents a strong challenge to
the Population III seed model, which calls for seed masses of ~ 100 M_Sun and,
even with constant Eddington-limited accretion, requires e_rad < 0.09 to
explain the highest-z SMBHs in today's standard LambdaCDM cosmological model.
It is, however, consistent with the prediction of the direct collapse scenario
of SMBH seed formation, in which a supermassive primordial star forms in a
region of the universe with a high molecule-dissociating background radiation
field, and collapses directly into a 10^4--10^6 M_Sun seed BH. These results
corroborate recent cosmological simulations and observational campaigns which
suggest that these massive BHs were the seeds of a large fraction of the SMBHs
residing in the centers of galaxies today.
[144]
oai:arXiv.org:1302.0436 [pdf] - 1159460
Illuminating the Primeval Universe with Type IIn Supernovae
Whalen, Daniel J.;
Even, Wesley;
Lovekin, C. C.;
Fryer, Chris L.;
Stiavelli, Massimo;
Roming, P. W. A.;
Cooke, Jeff;
Pritchard, T. A.;
Holz, Daniel E.;
Knight, Cynthia
Submitted: 2013-02-02, last modified: 2013-03-13
The detection of Pop III supernovae could directly probe the primordial IMF
for the first time, unveiling the properties of the first galaxies, early
chemical enrichment and reionization, and the seeds of supermassive black
holes. Growing evidence that some Pop III stars were less massive than 100
solar masses may complicate prospects for their detection, because even though
they would have been more plentiful they would have died as core-collapse
supernovae, with far less luminosity than pair-instability explosions. This
picture greatly improves if the SN shock collides with a dense circumstellar
shell ejected during a prior violent LBV type eruption. Such collisions can
turn even dim SNe into extremely bright ones whose luminosities can rival those
of pair-instability SNe. We present simulations of Pop III Type IIn SN light
curves and spectra performed with the Los Alamos RAGE and SPECTRUM codes.
Taking into account Lyman-alpha absorption in the early universe and
cosmological redshifting, we find that 40 solar mass Pop III Type IIn SNe will
be visible out to z ~ 20 with JWST and out to z ~ 7 with WFIRST. Thus, even low
mass Pop III SNe can be used to probe the primeval universe.
[145]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.5459 [pdf] - 1151616
Finding the First Cosmic Explosions II: Core-Collapse Supernovae
Submitted: 2012-09-24, last modified: 2013-03-08
Understanding the properties of Pop III stars is prerequisite to elucidating
the nature of primeval galaxies, the chemical enrichment and reionization of
the early IGM, and the origin of supermassive black holes. While the primordial
IMF remains unknown, recent evidence from numerical simulations and stellar
archaeology suggests that some Pop III stars may have had lower masses than
previously thought, 15 - 50 \Ms in addition to 50 - 500 \Ms. The detection of
Pop III supernovae by JWST, WFIRST or the TMT could directly probe the
primordial IMF for the first time. We present numerical simulations of 15 - 40
\Ms Pop III core-collapse SNe done with the Los Alamos radiation hydrodynamics
code RAGE. We find that they will be visible in the earliest galaxies out to z
~ 10 - 15, tracing their star formation rates and in some cases revealing their
positions on the sky. Since the central engines of Pop III and
solar-metallicity core-collapse SNe are quite similar, future detection of any
Type II supernovae by next-generation NIR instruments will in general be
limited to this epoch.
[146]
oai:arXiv.org:1209.3457 [pdf] - 1151425
Seeing the First Supernovae at the Edge of the Universe with JWST
Submitted: 2012-09-16, last modified: 2012-11-22
The first stars ended the cosmic Dark Ages and created the first heavy
elements necessary for the formation of planets and life. The properties of
these stars remain uncertain, and it may be decades before individual Pop III
stars are directly observed. Their masses, however, can be inferred from their
supernova explosions, which may soon be found in both deep-field surveys by
JWST and in all-sky surveys by WFIRST. We have performed radiation
hydrodynamical simulations of the near infrared signals of Pop III
pair-instability supernovae in realistic circumstellar environments with Lyman
absorption by the neutral intergalactic medium. We find that JWST and WFIRST
will detect these explosions out to z ~ 30 and 20, respectively, unveiling the
first generation of stars in the universe.
[147]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.4901 [pdf] - 1116823
Double Compact Objects I: The Significance Of The Common Envelope On
Merger Rates
Submitted: 2012-02-22, last modified: 2012-09-10
The last decade of observational and theoretical developments in stellar and
binary evolution provides an opportunity to incorporate major improvements to
the predictions from populations synthesis models. We compute the Galactic
merger rates for NS-NS, BH-NS, and BH-BH mergers with the StarTrack code. The
most important revisions include: updated wind mass loss rates (allowing for
stellar mass black holes up to $80 \msun$), a realistic treatment of the common
envelope phase (a process that can affect merger rates by 2--3 orders of
magnitude), and a qualitatively new neutron star/black hole mass distribution
(consistent with the observed "mass gap"). Our findings include: (i) The
binding energy of the envelope plays a pivotal role in determining whether a
binary merges within a Hubble time. (ii) Our description of natal kicks from
supernovae plays an important role, especially for the formation of BH-BH
systems. (iii) The masses of BH-BH systems can be substantially increased in
the case of low metallicities or weak winds. (iv) Certain combinations of
parameters underpredict the Galactic NS-NS merger rate, and can be ruled out.
{\em (v)} Models incorporating delayed supernovae do not agree with the
observed NS/BH "mass gap", in accordance with our previous work. This is the
first in a series of three papers. The second paper will study the merger rates
of double compact objects as a function of redshift, star formation rate, and
metallicity. In the third paper we will present the detection rates for
gravitational wave observatories, using up-to-date signal waveforms and
sensitivity curves.
[148]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.1635 [pdf] - 1084717
Missing Black Holes Unveil The Supernova Explosion Mechanism
Submitted: 2011-10-07, last modified: 2012-07-31
It is firmly established that the stellar mass distribution is smooth,
covering the range 0.1-100 Msun. It is to be expected that the masses of the
ensuing compact remnants correlate with the masses of their progenitor stars,
and thus it is generally thought that the remnant masses should be smoothly
distributed from the lightest white dwarfs to the heaviest black holes.
However, this intuitive prediction is not borne out by observed data. In the
rapidly growing population of remnants with observationally determined masses,
a striking mass gap has emerged at the boundary between neutron stars and black
holes. The heaviest neutron stars reach a maximum of two solar masses, while
the lightest black holes are at least five solar masses. Over a decade after
the discovery, the gap has become a significant challenge to our understanding
of compact object formation. We offer new insights into the physical processes
that bifurcate the formation of remnants into lower mass neutron stars and
heavier black holes. Combining the results of stellar modeling with
hydrodynamic simulations of supernovae, we both explain the existence of the
gap, and also put stringent constraints on the inner workings of the supernova
explosion mechanism. In particular, we show that core-collapse supernovae are
launched within 100-200 milliseconds of the initial stellar collapse, implying
that the explosions are driven by instabilities with a rapid (10-20 ms) growth
time. Alternatively, if future observations fill in the gap, this will be an
indication that these instabilities develop over a longer (>200 milliseconds)
timescale.
[149]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.0703 [pdf] - 1123867
GRB beaming and gravitational-wave observations
Submitted: 2012-06-04
Using the observed rate of short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) it is
possible to make predictions for the detectable rate of compact binary
coalescences in gravitational-wave detectors. These estimates rely crucially on
the growing consensus that short gamma-ray bursts are associated with the
merger of two neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole, but otherwise
make no assumptions beyond the observed rate of short GRBs. In particular, our
results do not assume coincident gravitational wave and electromagnetic
observations. We show that the non-detection of mergers in the existing
LIGO/Virgo data constrains the progenitor masses and beaming angles of
gamma-ray bursts. For future detectors, we find that the first detection of a
NS-NS binary coalescence associated with the progenitors of short GRBs is
likely to happen within the first 16 months of observation, even in the case of
a modest network of observatories (e.g., only LIGO-Hanford and LIGO-Livingston)
operating at modest sensitivities (e.g., advanced LIGO design sensitivity, but
without signal recycling mirrors), and assuming a conservative distribution of
beaming angles (e.g. all GRBs beamed at \theta=30 deg). Less conservative
assumptions reduce the waiting time until first detection to weeks to months.
Alternatively, the compact binary coalescence model of short GRBs can be ruled
out if a binary is not seen within the first two years of operation of a
LIGO-Hanford, LIGO-Livingston, and Virgo network at advanced design
sensitivity. We also demonstrate that the rate of GRB triggered sources is less
than the rate of untriggered events if \theta<30 deg, independent of the noise
curve, network configuration, and observed GRB rate. Thus the first detection
in GWs of a binary GRB progenitor is unlikely to be associated with a GRB.
[150]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.5809 [pdf] - 1085153
Evidence for Type Ia Supernova Diversity from Ultraviolet Observations
with the Hubble Space Telescope
Wang, Xiaofeng;
Wang, Lifan;
Filippenko, Alexei V.;
Baron, Eddie;
Kromer, Markus;
Jack, Dennis;
Zhang, Tianmeng;
Aldering, Greg;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Arnett, David;
Baade, Dietrich;
Barris, Brian J.;
Benetti, Stefano;
Bouchet, Patrice;
Burrows, Adam S.;
Canal, Ramon;
Cappellaro, Enrico;
Carlberg, Raymond;
di Carlo, Elisa;
Challis, Peter;
Crotts, Arlin;
Danziger, John I.;
Della Valle, Massimo;
Fink, Michael;
Foley, Ryan J.;
Fransson, Claes;
Gal-Yam, Avishay;
Garnavich, Peter;
Gerardy, Chris L.;
Goldhaber, Gerson;
Hamuy, Mario;
Hillebrandt, Wolfgang;
Hoeflich, Peter A.;
Holland, Stephen T.;
Holz, Daniel E.;
Hughes, John P.;
Jeffery, David J.;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
Kasen, Dan;
Khokhlov, Alexei M.;
Kirshner, Robert P.;
Knop, Robert;
Kozma, Cecilia;
Krisciunas, Kevin;
Lee, Brian C.;
Leibundgut, Bruno;
Lentz, Eric J.;
Leonard, Douglas C.;
Lewin, Walter H. G.;
Li, Weidong;
Livio, Mario;
Lundqvist, Peter;
Maoz, Dan;
Matheson, Thomas;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Meikle, Peter;
Miknaitis, Gajus;
Milne, Peter;
Mochnacki, Stefan;
Nomoto, Ken'Ichi;
Nugent, Peter E.;
Oran, Elaine;
Panagia, Nino;
Perlmutter, Saul;
Phillips, Mark M.;
Pinto, Philip;
Poznanski, Dovi;
Pritchet, Christopher J.;
Reinecke, Martin;
Riess, Adam;
Ruiz-Lapuente, Pilar;
Scalzo, Richard;
Schlegel, Eric M.;
Schmidt, Brian;
Siegrist, James;
Soderberg, Alicia M.;
Sollerman, Jesper;
Sonneborn, George;
Spadafora, Anthony;
Spyromilio, Jason;
Sramek, Richard A.;
Starrfield, Sumner G.;
Strolger, Louis G.;
Suntzeff, Nicholas B.;
Thomas, Rollin;
Tonry, John L.;
Tornambe, Amedeo;
Truran, James W.;
Turatto, Massimo;
Turner, Michael;
Van Dyk, Schuyler D.;
Weiler, Kurt;
Wheeler, J. Craig;
Wood-Vasey, Michael;
Woosley, Stan;
Yamaoka, Hitoshi
Submitted: 2011-10-26, last modified: 2012-02-06
We present ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy and photometry of four Type Ia
supernovae (SNe 2004dt, 2004ef, 2005M, and 2005cf) obtained with the UV prism
of the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope. This dataset
provides unique spectral time series down to 2000 Angstrom. Significant
diversity is seen in the near maximum-light spectra (~ 2000--3500 Angstrom) for
this small sample. The corresponding photometric data, together with archival
data from Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope observations, provide further
evidence of increased dispersion in the UV emission with respect to the
optical. The peak luminosities measured in uvw1/F250W are found to correlate
with the B-band light-curve shape parameter dm15(B), but with much larger
scatter relative to the correlation in the broad-band B band (e.g., ~0.4 mag
versus ~0.2 mag for those with 0.8 < dm15 < 1.7 mag). SN 2004dt is found as an
outlier of this correlation (at > 3 sigma), being brighter than normal SNe Ia
such as SN 2005cf by ~0.9 mag and ~2.0 mag in the uvw1/F250W and uvm2/F220W
filters, respectively. We show that different progenitor metallicity or
line-expansion velocities alone cannot explain such a large discrepancy.
Viewing-angle effects, such as due to an asymmetric explosion, may have a
significant influence on the flux emitted in the UV region. Detailed modeling
is needed to disentangle and quantify the above effects.
[151]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.1726 [pdf] - 1084732
Compact Remnant Mass Function: Dependence on the Explosion Mechanism and
Metallicity
Submitted: 2011-10-08
The mass distribution of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes provides
vital clues into the nature of stellar core collapse and the physical engine
responsible for supernova explosions. Using recent advances in our
understanding of supernova engines, we derive mass distributions of stellar
compact remnants. We provide analytical prescriptions for compact object masses
for major population synthesis codes. In an accompanying paper, Belczynski et
al., we demonstrate that these qualitatively new results for compact objects
can explain the observed gap in the remnant mass distribution between ~2-5
solar masses and that they place strong constraints on the nature of the
supernova engine. Here, we show that advanced gravitational radiation detectors
(like LIGO/VIRGO or the Einstein Telescope) will be able to further test the
supernova explosion engine models once double black hole inspirals are
detected.
[152]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.0681 [pdf] - 442253
Outflowing Galactic Winds in Post-starburst and AGN Host Galaxies at
0.2<z<0.8
Submitted: 2011-04-04, last modified: 2011-09-23
We present Keck/LRIS-B spectra for a sample of ten AEGIS X-ray AGN host
galaxies and thirteen post-starburst galaxies from SDSS and DEEP2 at 0.2<z<0.8
in order to investigate the presence, properties, and influence of outflowing
galactic winds at intermediate redshifts. We focus on galaxies that either host
a low-luminosity AGN or have recently had their star formation quenched to test
whether these galaxies have winds of sufficient velocity to potentially clear
gas from the galaxy. We find, using absorption features of Fe II, Mg II, and Mg
I, that six of the ten (60%) X-ray AGN host galaxies and four of the thirteen
(31%) post-starburst galaxies have outflowing galactic winds, with typical
velocities of ~200 km/s. We additionally find that most of the galaxies in our
sample show line emission, possibly from the wind, in either Fe II* or Mg II. A
total of 100% of our X-ray AGN host sample (including four red sequence
galaxies) and 77% of our post-starburst sample has either blueshifted
absorption or line emission. Several K+A galaxies have small amounts of cool
gas absorption at the systemic velocity, indicating that not all of the cool
gas has been expelled. We conclude that while outflowing galactic winds are
common in both X-ray low-luminosity AGN host galaxies and post-starburst
galaxies at intermediate redshifts, the winds are likely driven by supernovae
(as opposed to AGN) and do not appear to have sufficiently high velocities to
quench star formation in these galaxies.
[153]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.3184 [pdf] - 1076661
Localizing compact binary inspirals on the sky using ground-based
gravitational wave interferometers
Submitted: 2011-05-16, last modified: 2011-09-15
The inspirals and mergers of compact binaries are among the most promising
events for ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) observatories. The detection of
electromagnetic (EM) signals from these sources would provide complementary
information to the GW signal. It is therefore important to determine the
ability of gravitational-wave detectors to localize compact binaries on the
sky, so that they can be matched to their EM counterparts. We use Markov Chain
Monte Carlo techniques to study sky localization using networks of ground-based
interferometers. Using a coherent-network analysis, we find that the Laser
Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO)-Virgo network can localize
50% of their ~8 sigma detected neutron star binaries to better than 50 sq.deg.
with 95% confidence region. The addition of the Large Scale Cryogenic
Gravitational Wave Telescope (LCGT) and LIGO-Australia improves this to 12
sq.deg.. Using a more conservative coincident detection threshold, we find that
50% of detected neutron star binaries are localized to 13 sq.deg. using the
LIGO-Virgo network, and to 3 sq.deg. using the LIGO-Virgo-LCGT-LIGO-Australia
network. Our findings suggest that the coordination of GW observatories and EM
facilities offers great promise.
[154]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.1017 [pdf] - 266253
Exploring short gamma-ray bursts as gravitational-wave standard sirens
Submitted: 2009-04-07, last modified: 2010-10-17
Recent observations support the hypothesis that a large fraction of
"short-hard" gamma-ray bursts (SHBs) are associated with compact binary
inspiral. Since gravitational-wave (GW) measurements of well-localized
inspiraling binaries can measure absolute source distances, simultaneous
observation of a binary's GWs and SHB would allow us to independently determine
both its luminosity distance and redshift. Such a "standard siren" (the GW
analog of a standard candle) would provide an excellent probe of the relatively
nearby universe's expansion, complementing other standard candles. In this
paper, we examine binary measurement using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique
to build the probability distributions describing measured parameters. We
assume that each SHB observation gives both sky position and the time of
coalescence, and we take both binary neutron stars and black hole-neutron star
coalescences as plausible SHB progenitors. We examine how well parameters
particularly distance) can be measured from GW observations of SHBs by a range
of ground-based detector networks. We find that earlier estimates overstate how
well distances can be measured, even at fairly large signal-to-noise ratio. The
fundamental limitation to determining distance proves to be a degeneracy
between distance and source inclination. Overcoming this limitation requires
that we either break this degeneracy, or measure enough sources to broadly
sample the inclination distribution. (Abridged)
[155]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.3988 [pdf] - 195371
Reducing the weak lensing noise for the gravitational wave Hubble
diagram using the non-Gaussianity of the magnification distribution
Submitted: 2010-04-22, last modified: 2010-06-27
Gravitational wave sources are a promising cosmological standard candle
because their intrinsic luminosities are determined by fundamental physics (and
are insensitive to dust extinction). They are, however, affected by weak
lensing magnification due to the gravitational lensing from structures along
the line of sight. This lensing is a source of uncertainty in the distance
determination, even in the limit of perfect standard candle measurements. It is
commonly believed that the uncertainty in the distance to an ensemble of
gravitational wave sources is limited by the standard deviation of the lensing
magnification distribution divided by the square root of the number of sources.
Here we show that by exploiting the non-Gaussian nature of the lensing
magnification distribution, we can improve this distance determination,
typically by a factor of 2--3; we provide a fitting formula for the effective
distance accuracy as a function of redshift for sources where the lensing noise
dominates.
[156]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.0386 [pdf] - 1026092
The effect of metallicity on the detection prospects for gravitational
waves
Submitted: 2010-04-02, last modified: 2010-05-07
Data from the SDSS (300,000 galaxies) indicates that recent star formation
(within the last 1 billion years) is bimodal: half the stars form from gas with
high amounts of metals (solar metallicity), and the other half form with small
contribution of elements heavier than Helium (10-30% solar). Theoretical
studies of mass loss from the brightest stars derive significantly higher
stellar-origin BH masses (30-80 Msun) than previously estimated for sub-solar
compositions. We combine these findings to estimate the probability of
detecting gravitational waves (GWs) arising from the inspiral of double compact
objects. Our results show that a low metallicity environment significantly
boosts the formation of double compact object binaries with at least one BH. In
particular, we find the GW detection rate is increased by a factor of 20 if the
metallicity is decreased from solar (as in all previous estimates) to a 50-50
mixture of solar and 10% solar metallicity. The current sensitivity of the two
largest instruments to NS-NS binary inspirals (VIRGO: 9 Mpc; LIGO: 18) is not
high enough to ensure a first detection. However, our results indicate that if
a future instrument increased the sensitivity to 50-100 Mpc, a detection of GWs
would be expected within the first year of observation. It was previously
thought that NS-NS inspirals were the most likely source for GW detection. Our
results indicate that BH-BH binaries are 25-times more likely sources than
NS-NS systems and that we are on the cusp of GW detection.
[157]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.5349 [pdf] - 559258
The most massive objects in the Universe
Submitted: 2010-04-29, last modified: 2010-05-06
We calculate the most massive object in the Universe, finding it to be a
cluster of galaxies with total mass M_200=3.8e15 Msun at z=0.22, with the 1
sigma marginalized regions being 3.3e15 Msun<M<4.4e15 Msun and 0.12<z<0.36. We
restrict ourselves to self-gravitating bound objects, and base our results on
halo mass functions derived from N-body simulations. Since we consider the very
highest mass objects, the number of candidates is expected to be small, and
therefore each candidate can be extensively observed and characterized. If
objects are found with excessively large masses, or insufficient objects are
found near the maximum expected mass, this would be a strong indication of the
failure of LambdaCDM. The expected range of the highest masses is very
sensitive to redshift, providing an additional evolutionary probe of LambdaCDM.
We find that the three most massive clusters in the recent SPT 178 deg^2
catalog match predictions, while XMMU J2235.3--2557 is roughly 3 sigma
inconsistent with LambdaCDM. We discuss Abell 2163 and Abell 370 as candidates
for the most massive cluster in the Universe, although uncertainties in their
masses preclude definitive comparisons with theory. Our findings motivate
further observations of the highest mass end of the mass function. Future
surveys will explore larger volumes, and the most massive object in the
Universe may be identified within the next decade. The mass distribution of the
largest objects in the Universe is a potentially powerful test of LambdaCDM,
probing non-Gaussianity and the behavior of gravity on large scales.
[158]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.4697 [pdf] - 155023
Weak lensing and dark energy: the impact of dark energy on nonlinear
dark matter clustering
Submitted: 2009-04-30, last modified: 2010-01-25
We examine the influence of percent-level dark energy corrections to the
nonlinear matter power spectrum on constraints of the dark energy equation of
state from future weak lensing probes. We explicitly show that a poor
approximation (off by > 10%) to the nonlinear corrections causes a > 1 sigma
bias on the determination of the dark energy equation of state. Future weak
lensing surveys must therefore incorporate dark energy modifications to the
nonlinear matter power spectrum accurate to the percent-level, to avoid
introducing significant bias in their measurements. For the WMAP5 cosmology,
the more accurate power spectrum is more sensitive to dark energy properties,
resulting in a factor of two improvement in dark energy equation of state
constraints. We explore the complementary constraints on dark energy from
future weak lensing and supernova surveys. A space-based, JDEM-like survey
measures the equation of state in five independent redshift bins to ~10%, while
this improves to ~5% for a wide-field ground-based survey like LSST. These
constraints are contingent upon our ability to control weak lensing systematic
uncertainties to the sub-percent level.
[159]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.2470 [pdf] - 172728
On The Origin Of The Highest Redshift Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2008-12-12, last modified: 2009-11-21
GRB 080913 and GRB 090423 are the most distant gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) known
to-date, with spectroscopically determined redshifts of z=6.7 and z=8.1,
respectively. The detection of bursts at this early epoch of the Universe
significantly constrains the nature of GRBs and their progenitors. We perform
population synthesis studies of the formation and evolution of early stars, and
calculate the resulting formation rates of short and long-duration GRBs at high
redshift. The peak of the GRB rate from Population II stars occurs at z=7 for a
model with efficient/fast mixing of metals, while it is found at z=3 for an
inefficient/slow metallicity evolution model. We show that in the redshift
range 6<z<10 essentially all GRBs originate from Population II stars,
regardless of metallicity evolution model. These stars (having small, but
non-zero metallicity) are the most likely progenitors for both long GRBs
(collapsars) and short GRBs (NS-NS or BH-NS mergers) at this epoch. Although
the predicted intrinsic rates of long and short GRBs are similar at these high
redshifts, observational selection effects lead to higher (factor of 10)
observed rates for long GRBs. We conclude that the two recently observed high-z
GRB events are most likely long GRBs originating from Population II collapsars.
[160]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.3186 [pdf] - 27527
No Evidence for Dark Energy Dynamics from a Global Analysis of
Cosmological Data
Submitted: 2009-08-21
We use a variant of principal component analysis to investigate the possible
temporal evolution of the dark energy equation of state, w(z). We constrain
w(z) in multiple redshift bins, utilizing the most recent data from Type Ia
supernovae, the cosmic microwave background, baryon acoustic oscillations, the
integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, galaxy clustering, and weak lensing data. Unlike
other recent analyses, we find no significant evidence for evolving dark
energy; the data remains completely consistent with a cosmological constant. We
also study the extent to which the time-evolution of the equation of state
would be constrained by a combination of current- and future-generation
surveys, such as Planck and the Joint Dark Energy Mission.
[161]
oai:arXiv.org:0906.3752 [pdf] - 669456
Ultra-high precision cosmology from gravitational waves
Submitted: 2009-06-19
We show that the Big Bang Observer (BBO), a proposed space-based
gravitational-wave (GW) detector, would provide ultra-precise measurements of
cosmological parameters. By detecting ~300,000 compact-star binaries, and
utilizing them as standard sirens, BBO would determine the Hubble constant to
0.1%, and the dark energy parameters w_0 and w_a to ~0.01 and 0.1,resp. BBO's
dark-energy figure-of-merit would be approximately an order of magnitude better
than all other proposed dark energy missions. To date, BBO has been designed
with the primary goal of searching for gravitational waves from inflation. To
observe this inflationary background, BBO would first have to detect and
subtract out ~300,000 merging compact-star binaries, out to z~5. It is
precisely this foreground which would enable high-precision cosmology. BBO
would determine the luminosity distance to each binary to ~percent accuracy.
BBO's angular resolution would be sufficient to uniquely identify the host
galaxy for most binaries; a coordinated optical/infrared observing campaign
could obtain the redshifts. Combining the GW-derived distances and EM-derived
redshifts for such a large sample of objects leads to extraordinarily tight
constraints on cosmological parameters. Such ``standard siren'' measurements of
cosmology avoid many of the systematic errors associated with other techniques.
We also show that BBO would be an exceptionally powerful gravitational lensing
mission, and we briefly discuss other astronomical uses of BBO.
[162]
oai:arXiv.org:0903.3384 [pdf] - 22540
Low-Energy Astrophysics: Stimulating the Reduction of Energy Consumption
in the Next Decade
Marshall, P. J.;
Bennert, N.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Shen, K. J.;
Steinfadt, J. D. R.;
Fregeau, J.;
Chary, R-R.;
Sheth, K.;
Weiner, B.;
Henisey, K. B.;
Quetin, E. L.;
Antonucci, R.;
Kaplan, D.;
Jonsson, P.;
Auger, M. W.;
Cardamone, C.;
Tao, T.;
Holz, D. E.;
Bradac, M.;
Metcalfe, T. S.;
McHugh, S.;
Elvis, M.;
Brewer, B. J.;
Urrutia, T.;
Guo, F.;
Hovest, W.;
Nakajima, R.;
For, B. -Q.;
Erb, D.;
Paneque, D.
Submitted: 2009-03-19
In this paper we address the consumption of energy by astronomers while
performing their professional duties. Although we find that astronomy uses a
negligible fraction of the US energy budget, the rate at which energy is
consumed by an average astronomer is similar to that of a typical high-flying
businessperson. We review some of the ways in which astronomers are already
acting to reduce their energy consumption. In the coming decades, all citizens
will have to reduce their energy consumption to conserve fossil fuel reserves
and to help avert a potentially catastrophic change in the Earth's climate. The
challenges are the same for astronomers as they are for everyone: decreasing
the distances we travel and investing in energy-efficient infrastructure. The
high profile of astronomy in the media, and the great public interest in our
field, can play a role in promoting energy-awareness to the wider population.
Our specific recommendations are therefore to 1) reduce travel when possible,
through efficient meeting organization, and by investing in high-bandwidth
video conference facilities and virtual-world software, 2) create
energy-efficient observatories, computing centers and workplaces, powered by
sustainable energy resources, and 3) actively publicize these pursuits.
[163]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.1527 [pdf] - 579759
Astro2010 Decadal Survey Whitepaper: Coordinated Science in the
Gravitational and Electromagnetic Skies
Bloom, Joshua S.;
Holz, Daniel E.;
Hughes, Scott A.;
Menou, Kristen;
Adams, Allan;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Becker, Andy;
Bower, Geoffrey C.;
Brandt, Niel;
Cobb, Bethany;
Cook, Kem;
Corsi, Alessandra;
Covino, Stefano;
Fox, Derek;
Fruchter, Andrew;
Fryer, Chris;
Grindlay, Jonathan;
Hartmann, Dieter;
Haiman, Zoltan;
Kocsis, Bence;
Jones, Lynne;
Loeb, Abraham;
Marka, Szabolcs;
Metzger, Brian;
Nakar, Ehud;
Nissanke, Samaya;
Perley, Daniel A.;
Piran, Tsvi;
Poznanski, Dovi;
Prince, Tom;
Schnittman, Jeremy;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Strauss, Michael;
Shawhan, Peter S.;
Shoemaker, David H.;
Sievers, Jonathan;
Stubbs, Christopher;
Tagliaferri, Gianpiero;
Ubertini, Pietro;
Wozniak, Przemyslaw
Submitted: 2009-02-10
It is widely expected that the coming decade will witness the first direct
detection of gravitational waves (GWs). The ground-based LIGO and Virgo GW
observatories are being upgraded to advanced sensitivity, and are expected to
observe a significant binary merger rate. The launch of The Laser
Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) would extend the GW window to low
frequencies, opening new vistas on dynamical processes involving massive (M >~
10^5 M_Sun) black holes. GW events are likely to be accompanied by
electromagnetic (EM) counterparts and, since information carried
electromagnetically is complementary to that carried gravitationally, a great
deal can be learned about an event and its environment if it becomes possible
to measure both forms of radiation in concert. Measurements of this kind will
mark the dawn of trans-spectral astrophysics, bridging two distinct spectral
bands of information. The aim of this whitepaper is to articulate future
directions in both theory and observation that are likely to impact broad
astrophysical inquiries of general interest. What will EM observations reflect
on the nature and diversity of GW sources? Can GW sources be exploited as
complementary probes of cosmology? What cross-facility coordination will expand
the science returns of gravitational and electromagnetic observations?
[164]
oai:arXiv.org:0812.0376 [pdf] - 264995
Measuring dark energy spatial inhomogeneity with supernova data
Submitted: 2008-12-01
The gravitational lensing distortion of distant sources by the large-scale
distribution of matter in the Universe has been extensively studied. In
contrast, very little is known about the effects due to the large-scale
distribution of dark energy. We discuss the use of Type Ia supernovae as probes
of the spatial inhomogeneity and anisotropy of dark energy. We show that a
shallow, almost all-sky survey can limit rms dark energy fluctuations at the
horizon scale down to a fractional energy density of ~10^-4
[165]
oai:arXiv.org:0806.3267 [pdf] - 260197
Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological
Measurements
Submitted: 2008-06-19, last modified: 2008-07-21
Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two
distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating
properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate
systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any
resulting {\em post}-calibration shift in luminosity between the components
will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram.
Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity
difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be $(4.5 \pm
8.9)%$. If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag,
and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark
energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is
biased at $\sim1\sigma$. By incorporating the possibility of a two-population
systematic, this bias can be eliminated. However, assuming no prior on the
strength of the two-population effect, the uncertainty in the best-fit EOS is
increased by a factor of 2.5, when compared to the equivalent sample with no
underlying two-population systematic. To avoid introducing a bias in the EOS
parameters, or significantly degrading the measurement accuracy, it is
necessary to control the post-calibration luminosity difference between prompt
and delayed SN populations to better than 0.025 mag.
[166]
oai:arXiv.org:0709.1150 [pdf] - 4716
Beyond Two Dark Energy Parameters
Submitted: 2007-09-10, last modified: 2008-06-13
Our ignorance of the dark energy is generally described by a two-parameter
equation of state. In these approaches a particular {\it ad hoc} functional
form is assumed, and only two independent parameters are incorporated. We
propose a model-independent, multi-parameter approach to fitting the dark
energy, and show that next-generation surveys will constrain the equation of
state in three or more independent redshift bins to better than 10%. Future
knowledge of the dark energy will surpass two numbers (e.g., [$w_0$,$w_1$] or
[$w_0$,$w_a$]), and we propose a more flexible approach to the analysis of
present and future data.
[167]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.0518 [pdf] - 1878
Close Pairs as Proxies for Galaxy Cluster Mergers
Submitted: 2007-06-04, last modified: 2008-04-28
Galaxy cluster merger statistics are an important component in understanding
the formation of large-scale structure. Unfortunately, it is difficult to study
merger properties and evolution directly because the identification of cluster
mergers in observations is problematic. We use large N-body simulations to
study the statistical properties of massive halo mergers, specifically
investigating the utility of close halo pairs as proxies for mergers. We
examine the relationship between pairs and mergers for a wide range of merger
timescales, halo masses, and redshifts (0<z<1). We also quantify the utility of
pairs in measuring merger bias. While pairs at very small separations will
reliably merge, these constitute a small fraction of the total merger
population. Thus, pairs do not provide a reliable direct proxy to the total
merger population. We do find an intriguing universality in the relation
between close pairs and mergers, which in principle could allow for an estimate
of the statistical merger rate from the pair fraction within a scaled
separation, but including the effects of redshift space distortions strongly
degrades this relation. We find similar behavior for galaxy-mass halos, making
our results applicable to field galaxy mergers at high redshift. We investigate
how the halo merger rate can be statistically described by the halo mass
function via the merger kernel (coagulation), finding an interesting
environmental dependence of merging: halos within the mass resolution of our
simulations merge less efficiently in overdense environments. Specifically,
halo pairs with separations less than a few Mpc/h are more likely to merge in
underdense environments; at larger separations, pairs are more likely to merge
in overdense environments.
[168]
oai:arXiv.org:0803.2706 [pdf] - 314906
Toward a halo mass function for precision cosmology: the limits of
universality
Submitted: 2008-03-18
We measure the mass function of dark matter halos in a large set of
collisionless cosmological simulations of flat LCDM cosmology and investigate
its evolution at z<~2. Halos are identified as isolated density peaks, and
their masses are measured within a series of radii enclosing specific
overdensities. We argue that these spherical overdensity masses are more
directly linked to cluster observables than masses measured using the
friends-of-friends algorithm (FOF), and are therefore preferable for accurate
forecasts of halo abundances. Our simulation set allows us to calibrate the
mass function at z=0 for virial masses in the range 10^{11} Msol/h < M <
10^{15} Msol/h, to <~ 5%. We derive fitting functions for the halo mass
function in this mass range for a wide range of overdensities, both at z=0 and
earlier epochs. In addition to these formulae, which improve on previous
approximations by 10-20%, our main finding is that the mass function cannot be
represented by a universal fitting function at this level of accuracy. The
amplitude of the "universal" function decreases monotonically by ~20-50%,
depending on the mass definition, from z=0 to 2.5. We also find evidence for
redshift evolution in the overall shape of the mass function.
[169]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.4143 [pdf] - 6287
Lensing and Supernovae: Quantifying The Bias on the Dark Energy Equation
of State
Submitted: 2007-10-22, last modified: 2008-01-30
The gravitational magnification and demagnification of Type Ia supernovae
(SNe) modify their positions on the Hubble diagram, shifting the distance
estimates from the underlying luminosity-distance relation. This can introduce
a systematic uncertainty in the dark energy equation of state (EOS) estimated
from SNe, although this systematic is expected to average away for sufficiently
large data sets. Using mock SN samples over the redshift range $0 < z \leq 1.7$
we quantify the lensing bias. We find that the bias on the dark energy EOS is
less than half a percent for large datasets ($\gtrsim$ 2,000 SNe). However, if
highly magnified events (SNe deviating by more than 2.5$\sigma$) are
systematically removed from the analysis, the bias increases to $\sim$ 0.8%.
Given that the EOS parameters measured from such a sample have a 1$\sigma$
uncertainty of 10%, the systematic bias related to lensing in SN data out to $z
\sim 1.7$ can be safely ignored in future cosmological measurements.
[170]
oai:arXiv.org:0708.4391 [pdf] - 4444
CMB Cluster Lensing: Cosmography with the Longest Lever Arm
Submitted: 2007-08-31
We discuss combining gravitational lensing of galaxies and the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) by clusters to measure cosmographic distance ratios,
and hence dark energy parameters. Advantages to using the CMB as the second
source plane, instead of galaxies, include: a well-determined source distance,
a longer lever arm for distance ratios, typically up to an order of magnitude
higher sensitivity to dark energy parameters, and a decreased sensitivity to
photometric redshift accuracy of the lens and galaxy sources. Disadvantages
include: higher statistical errors, potential systematic errors, and the need
for disparate surveys that overlap on the sky. Ongoing and planned surveys,
such as the South Pol Telescope in conjunction with the Dark Energy Survey, can
potentially reach the statistical sensitivity to make interesting consistency
tests of the standard cosmological constant model. Future measurements that
reach 1% or better precision in the convergences can provide sharp tests for
future supernovae distance measurements.
[171]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.3730 [pdf] - 2548
Narrowing Constraints with Type Ia Supernovae: Converging on a
Cosmological Constant
Submitted: 2007-06-26
We apply a parameterization-independent approach to fitting the dark energy
equation-of-state (EOS). Utilizing the latest type Ia supernova data, combined
with results from the cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic
oscillations, we find that the dark energy is consistent with a cosmological
constant. We establish independent estimates of the evolution of the dark
energy EOS by diagonalizing the covariance matrix. We find three independent
constraints, which taken together imply that the equation of state is more
negative than -0.2 at the 68% confidence level in the redshift range 0<z<1.8,
independent of the flat universe assumption. Our estimates argue against
previous claims of dark energy ``metamorphosis,'' where the EOS was found to be
strongly varying at low redshifts. Our results are inconsistent with extreme
models of dynamical dark energy, both in the form of ``freezing'' models where
the dark energy EOS begins with a value greater than -0.2 at z > 1.2 and rolls
to a value of -1 today, and ``thawing'' models where the EOS is near -1 at high
redshifts, but rapidly evolves to values greater than -0.85 at z < 0.2.
Finally, we propose a parameterization-independent figure-of-merit, to help
assess the ability of future surveys to constrain dark energy. While previous
figures-of-merit presume specific dark energy parameterizations, we suggest a
binning approach to evaluate dark energy constraints with a minimum number of
assumptions.
[172]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611128 [pdf] - 163537
A New Population of High Redshift Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. B.;
Price, P. A.;
Nakar, E.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Frail, D. A.;
Penprase, B. E.;
Rau, A.;
Ofek, E.;
Burnell, S. J. Bell;
Cameron, P. B.;
Cowie, L. L.;
Dopita, M. A.;
Hook, I.;
Peterson, B. A.;
Podsiadlowski, Ph.;
Roth, K. C.;
Rutledge, R. E.;
Sheppard, S. S.;
Songaila, A.
Submitted: 2006-11-03, last modified: 2007-03-23
The redshift distribution of the short-duration GRBs is a crucial, but
currently fragmentary, clue to the nature of their progenitors. Here we present
optical observations of nine short GRBs obtained with Gemini, Magellan, and the
Hubble Space Telescope. We detect the afterglows and host galaxies of two short
bursts, and host galaxies for two additional bursts with known optical
afterglow positions, and five with X-ray positions (<6'' radius). In eight of
the nine cases we find that the most probable host galaxies are faint,
R~23-26.5 mag, and are therefore starkly different from the first few short GRB
hosts with R~17-22 mag and z<0.5. Indeed, we measure spectroscopic redshifts of
z~0.4-1.1 for the four brightest hosts. A comparison to large field galaxy
samples, as well as the hosts of long GRBs and previous short GRBs, indicates
that the fainter hosts likely reside at z>1. Our most conservative limit is
that at least half of the five hosts without a known redshift reside at z>0.7
(97% confidence level), suggesting that about 1/3-2/3 of all short GRBs
originate at higher redshifts than previously determined. This has two
important implications: (i) We constrain the acceptable age distributions to a
wide lognormal (sigma>1) with tau~4-8 Gyr, or to a power law, P(tau)~tau^n,
with -1<n<0; and (ii) the inferred isotropic energies,
E_{gamma,iso}~10^50-10^52 erg, are significantly larger than ~10^48-10^49 erg
for the low redshift short GRBs, indicating a large spread in energy release or
jet opening angles. Finally, we re-iterate the importance of short GRBs as
potential gravitational wave sources and find a conservative Advanced LIGO
detection rate of ~2-6 yr^-1.
[173]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0611093 [pdf] - 86479
Direct Reconstruction of the Dark Energy Scalar-Field Potential
Submitted: 2006-11-02, last modified: 2006-11-28
While the accelerated expansion of the Universe is by now well established,
an underlying scalar field potential possibly responsible for this acceleration
remains unconstrained. We present an attempt to reconstruct this potential
using recent SN data, under the assumption that the acceleration is driven by a
single scalar field. Current approaches to such reconstructions are based upon
simple parametric descriptions of either the luminosity distance or the dark
energy equation of state. We find that these various approximations lead to a
range of derived evolutionary histories of the dark energy equation of state
(although there is considerable overlap between the different potential shapes
allowed by the data). Instead of these indirect reconstruction schemes, we
discuss a technique to determine the potential directly from the data by
expressing it in terms of a binned scalar field. We apply this technique to a
recent SN dataset, and compare the results with model-dependent approaches. In
a similar fashion to direct estimates of the dark energy equation of state, we
advocate direct reconstruction of the scalar field potential as a way to
minimize prior assumptions on the shape, and thus minimize the introduction of
bias in the derived potential.
[174]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0606699 [pdf] - 83139
The Clustering of Massive Halos
Submitted: 2006-06-28, last modified: 2006-10-24
The clustering properties of dark matter halos are a firm prediction of
modern theories of structure formation. We use two large volume,
high-resolution N-body simulations to study how the correlation function of
massive dark matter halos depends upon their mass and formation history. We
find that halos with the lowest concentrations are presently more clustered
than those of higher concentration, the size of the effect increasing with halo
mass; this agrees with trends found in studies of lower mass halos. The
clustering dependence on other characterizations of the full mass accretion
history appears weaker than the effect with concentration. Using the integrated
correlation function, marked correlation functions, and a power-law fit to the
correlation function, we find evidence that halos which have recently undergone
a major merger or a large mass gain have slightly enhanced clustering relative
to a randomly chosen population with the same mass distribution.
[175]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0601275 [pdf] - 79133
Short GRB and binary black hole standard sirens as a probe of dark
energy
Submitted: 2006-01-13
Observations of the gravitational radiation from well-localized, inspiraling
compact object binaries can measure absolute source distances with high
accuracy. When coupled with an independent determination of redshift through an
electromagnetic counterpart, these standard sirens can provide an excellent
probe of the expansion history of the Universe and the dark energy. Short
gamma-ray bursts, if produced by merging neutron star binaries, would be
standard sirens with known redshifts detectable by ground-based GW networks
such as LIGO-II, Virgo, and AIGO. Depending upon the collimation of these GRBs,
a single year of observation of their gravitational waves can measure the
Hubble constant to about 2%. When combined with measurement of the absolute
distance to the last scattering surface of the cosmic microwave background,
this determines the dark energy equation of state parameter w to 9%. Similarly,
supermassive binary black hole inspirals will be standard sirens detectable by
LISA. Depending upon the precise redshift distribution, 100 sources could
measure w at the 4% level.
[176]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509579 [pdf] - 76160
Cosmology from supernova magnification maps
Submitted: 2005-09-20
High-z Type Ia supernovae are expected to be gravitationally lensed by the
foreground distribution of large-scale structure. The resulting magnification
of supernovae is statistically measurable, and the angular correlation of the
magnification pattern directly probes the integrated mass density along the
line of sight. Measurements of cosmic magnification of supernovae therefore
complements galaxy shear measurements in providing a direct measure of
clustering of the dark matter. As the number of supernovae is typically much
smaller than the number of sheared galaxies, the two-point correlation function
of lensed Type Ia supernovae suffers from significantly increased shot noise.
Neverthless, we find that the magnification map of a large sample of
supernovae, such as that expected from next generation dedicated searches, will
be easily measurable and provide an important cosmological tool. For example, a
search over 20 sq. deg. over five years leading to a sample of ~ 10,000
supernovae would measure the angular power spectrum of cosmic magnification
with a cumulative signal-to-noise ratio of ~20. This detection can be further
improved once the supernova distance measurements are cross-correlated with
measurements of the foreground galaxy distribution. The magnification maps made
using supernovae can be used for important cross-checks with traditional
lensing shear statistics obtained in the same fields, as well as help to
control systematics. We discuss two applications of supernova magnification
maps: the breaking of the mass-sheet degeneracy when estimating masses of
shear-detected clusters, and constraining the second-order corrections to weak
lensing observables.
[177]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509581 [pdf] - 358303
Problems with Pencils: Lensing Covariance of Supernova Distance
Measurements
Submitted: 2005-09-20
While luminosity distances from Type Ia supernovae (SNe) provide a powerful
probe of cosmological parameters, the accuracy with which these distances can
be measured is limited by cosmic magnification due to gravitational lensing by
the intervening large-scale structure. Spatial clustering of foreground mass
fluctuations leads to correlated errors in distance estimates from SNe. By
including the full covariance matrix of supernova distance measurements, we
show that a future survey covering more than a few square degrees on the sky,
and assuming a total of ~2000 SNe, will be largely unaffected by covariance
noise. ``Pencil beam'' surveys with small fields of view, however, will be
prone to the lensing covariance, leading to potentially significant
degradations in cosmological parameter estimates. For a survey with 30 arcmin
mean separation between SNe, lensing covariance leads to a ~45% increase in the
expected errors in dark energy parameters compared to fully neglecting lensing,
and a ~20% increase compared to including just the lensing variance. Given that
the lensing covariance is cosmology dependent and cannot be mapped out
sufficiently accurately with direct weak lensing observations, surveys with
small mean SN separation must incorporate the effects of lensing covariance,
including its dependence on the cosmological parameters.
[178]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0506395 [pdf] - 316293
Precision Determination of the Mass Function of Dark Matter Halos
Submitted: 2005-06-16
The predicted mass function of dark matter halos is essential in connecting
observed galaxy cluster counts and models of galaxy clustering to the
properties of the primordial density field. We determine the mass function in
the concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, as well as its uncertainty, using
sixteen $1024^3$-particle nested-volume dark-matter simulations, spanning a
mass range of over five orders of magnitude. Using the nested volumes and
single-halo tests, we find and correct for a systematic error in the
friends-of-friends halo-finding algorithm. We find a fitting form and full
error covariance for the mass function that successfully describes the
simulations' mass function and is well-behaved outside the simulations'
resolutions. Estimated forecasts of uncertainty in cosmological parameters from
future cluster count surveys have negligible contribution from remaining
statistical uncertainties in the central cosmology multiplicity function. There
exists a potentially non-negligible cosmological dependence (non-universality)
of the halo multiplicity function.
[179]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212218 [pdf] - 53608
Cosmology with coalescing massive black holes
Submitted: 2002-12-09, last modified: 2005-04-28
The gravitational waves generated in the coalescence of massive binary black
holes will be measurable by LISA to enormous distances. Redshifts z~10 or
larger (depending somewhat on the mass of the binary) can potentially be probed
by such measurements, suggesting that binary coalescences can be made into
cosmological tools. We discuss two particularly interesting types of probes.
First, by combining gravitational-wave measurements with information about the
universe's cosmography, we can study the evolution of black hole masses and
merger rates as a function of redshift, providing information about the growth
of structures at high redshift and possibly constraining hierarchical merger
scenarios. Second, if it is possible to associate an ``electromagnetic''
counterpart with a coalescence, it may be possible to measure both redshift and
luminosity distance to an event with less than ~1% error. Such a measurement
would constitute an amazingly precise cosmological standard candle.
Unfortunately, gravitational lensing uncertainties will reduce the quality of
this candle significantly. Though not as amazing as might have been hoped, such
a candle would nonetheless very usefully complement other distance-redshift
probes, in particular providing a valuable check on systematic effects in such
measurements.
[180]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0504616 [pdf] - 358295
Using gravitational-wave standard sirens
Submitted: 2005-04-27
Gravitational waves (GWs) from supermassive binary black hole (BBH) inspirals
are potentially powerful standard sirens (the GW analog to standard candles)
(Schutz 1986, 2002). Because these systems are well-modeled, the space-based GW
observatory LISA will be able to measure the luminosity distance (but not the
redshift) to some distant massive BBH systems with 1-10% accuracy. This
accuracy is largely limited by pointing error: GW sources generally are poorly
localized on the sky. Localizing the binary independently (e.g., through
association with an electromagnetic counterpart) greatly reduces this
positional error. An electromagnetic counterpart may also allow determination
of the event's redshift. In this case, BBH coalescence would constitute an
extremely precise (better than 1%) standard candle visible to high redshift. In
practice, gravitational lensing degrades this precision, though the candle
remains precise enough to provide useful information about the
distance-redshift relation. Even if very rare, these GW standard sirens would
complement, and increase confidence in, other standard candles.
[181]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0412173 [pdf] - 358274
Safety in numbers: Gravitational Lensing Degradation of the Luminosity
Distance-Redshift Relation
Submitted: 2004-12-07
Observation of the expansion history of the Universe allows exploration of
the physical properties and energy density of the Universe's various
constituents. Standardizable candles such as Type Ia supernovae remain one of
the most promising and robust tools in this endeavor, by allowing for a direct
measure of the luminosity distance-redshift curve, and thereby producing
detailed studies of the dark energy responsible for the Universe's currently
accelerating expansion. As such observations are pushed to higher redshifts,
the observed flux is increasingly affected by gravitational lensing
magnification due to intervening structure along the line-of-sight. We simulate
and analyze the non-Gaussian probability distribution function of
de/amplification due to lensing of standard candles, quantify the effect of a
convolution over many independent sources (which acts to restore the intrinsic
average (unlensed) luminosity due to flux conservation), and compute the
additional uncertainty due to lensing on derived cosmological parameters. For
example, the ``degradation factor'' due to lensing is a factor of three
reduction in the effective number of usable supernovae at z=1.5 (for sources
with intrinsic flux dispersion of 10%). We also derive a useful expression for
the effective increased dispersion in standard candles due to lensing, as a
function of redshift.
[182]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0408492 [pdf] - 66983
How black holes get their kicks: Radiation recoil in binary black hole
mergers
Submitted: 2004-08-25
Gravitational waves from the coalescence of binary black holes carry linear
momentum, causing center of mass recoil. This ``radiation rocket'' has
important implications for systems with escape speeds of order the recoil
velocity. We describe new recoil calculations using high precision black hole
perturbation theory to estimate the magnitude of the recoil for the slow
``inspiral'' coalescence phase; coupled with a cruder calculation for the final
``plunge'', we estimate the total recoil imparted to a merged black hole. We
find that velocities of many tens to a few hundred km/sec can be achieved
fairly easily. The recoil probably never exceeds about 500 km/sec.
[183]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0402056 [pdf] - 62570
How black holes get their kicks: Gravitational radiation recoil
revisited
Submitted: 2004-02-02, last modified: 2004-04-09
Gravitational waves from the coalescence of binary black holes carry away
linear momentum, causing center of mass recoil. This "radiation rocket" effect
has important implications for systems with escape speeds of order the recoil
velocity. We revisit this problem using black hole perturbation theory,
treating the binary as a test mass spiraling into a spinning hole. For extreme
mass ratios (q = m1/m2 << 1) we compute the recoil for the slow inspiral epoch
of binary coalescence very accurately; these results can be extrapolated to q ~
0.4 with modest accuracy. Although the recoil from the final plunge contributes
significantly to the final recoil, we are only able to make crude estimates of
its magnitude. We find that the recoil can easily reach ~ 100-200 km/s, but
most likely does not exceed ~ 500 km/s. Though much lower than previous
estimates, this recoil is large enough to have important astrophysical
consequences. These include the ejection of black holes from globular clusters,
dwarf galaxies, and high-redshift dark matter halos.
[184]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0402057 [pdf] - 358248
Consequences of gravitational radiation recoil
Submitted: 2004-02-02, last modified: 2004-04-09
Coalescing binary black holes experience an impulsive kick due to anisotropic
emission of gravitational waves. We discuss the dynamical consequences of the
recoil accompanying massive black hole mergers. Recoil velocities are
sufficient to eject most coalescing black holes from dwarf galaxies and
globular clusters, which may explain the apparent absence of massive black
holes in these systems. Ejection from giant elliptical galaxies would be rare,
but coalescing black holes are displaced from the center and fall back on a
time scale of order the half-mass crossing time. Displacement of the black
holes transfers energy to the stars in the nucleus and can convert a steep
density cusp into a core. Radiation recoil calls into question models that grow
supermassive black holes from hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass precursors.
[185]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0403188 [pdf] - 358255
Gravitational Waves from Stellar Collapse: Correlations to Explosion
Asymmetries
Submitted: 2004-03-08
The collapse of massive stars not only produces observable outbursts across
the entire electromagnetic spectrum but, for Galactic (or near-Galactic)
supernovae, detectable signals for ground-based neutrino and gravitational wave
detectors. Gravitational waves and neutrinos provide the only means to study
the actual engine behind the optical outbursts: the collapsed stellar core.
While the neutrinos are most sensitive to details of the equation of state,
gravitational waves provide a means to study the mass asymmetries in this
central core. We present gravitational wave signals from a series of
3-dimensional core-collapse simulations with asymmetries derived from initial
perturbations caused by pre-collapse convection, core rotation, and low-mode
convection in the explosion engine itself. A Galactic supernovae will allow us
to differentiate these different sources of asymmetry. Combining this signal
with other observations of the supernova, from neutrinos to gamma-rays to the
compact remnant, dramatically increases the predictive power of the
gravitational wave signal. We conclude with a discussion of the gravitational
wave signal arising from collapsars, the leading engine for long-duration
gamma-ray bursts.
[186]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0211609 [pdf] - 53344
Stellar collapse and gravitational waves
Submitted: 2002-11-27
The new generation of gravitational wave (GW) detectors have the potential to
open a novel window onto the violent dynamics of core collapse. Although it is
certain that core collapse events generate gravitational radiation,
understanding the characteristics of the radiation -- whether it can be
measured with these detectors, and the best way to go about doing so -- is a
challenging problem. In this chapter we review the promise of GWs as
observational probes, including a discussion of the current state of GW
detectors, and discuss the status of work to understand the waves generated by
stellar core collapse.
[187]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0209039 [pdf] - 51445
Retro-MACHOs: Pi in the sky?
Submitted: 2002-09-02
Shine a flashlight on a black hole, and one is greeted with the return of a
series of concentric rings of light. For a point source of light, and for
perfect alignment of the lens, source, and observer, the rings are of infinite
brightness (in the limit of geometric optics). In this manner, distant black
holes can be revealed through their reflection of light from the Sun. Such
retro-MACHO events involve photons leaving the Sun, making a Pi rotation about
the black hole, and then returning to be detected at the Earth. Our
calculations show that, although the light return is quite small, it may
nonetheless be detectable for stellar-mass black holes at the edge of our solar
system. For example, all (unobscured) black holes of mass M or greater will be
observable to a limiting magnitude m, at a distance given by: 0.02 pc x
\sqrt[3]{10^{(m-30)/2.5} (M/10 M_sun)^2}. Discovery of a Retro-MACHO offers a
way to directly image the presence of a black hole, and would be a stunning
confirmation of strong-field general relativity.
[188]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0206339 [pdf] - 49970
Corrective lenses for high redshift supernovae
Submitted: 2002-06-19, last modified: 2002-06-22
Weak lensing of high-redshift Type Ia supernovae induces an external
dispersion in their observed standard candle brightnesses, comparable in
magnitude to the intrinsic dispersion for redshifts z>1. The same matter
fluctuations responsible for the magnification of distant supernovae also
generate shear in the images of background galaxies. We investigate the
possibility of using lensing shear maps constructed from galaxies surrounding
the supernovae as a means of correcting the lensing-induced magnification
dispersion. We find that a considerable fraction of the lensing dispersion
derives from sub-arcminute scales, which are not probed by shear maps smoothed
on arcminute scales. We thus find that weak lensing shear maps will be of only
limited value in reducing the weak lensing magnification fluctuations of
supernovae.
[189]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0204169 [pdf] - 48714
A universal probability distribution function for weak-lensing
amplification
Submitted: 2002-04-09, last modified: 2002-05-06
We present an approximate form for the weak lensing magnification
distribution of standard candles, valid for all cosmological models, with
arbitrary matter distributions, over all redshifts. Our results are based on a
universal probability distribution function (UPDF), $P(\eta)$, for the reduced
convergence, $\eta$. For a given cosmological model, the magnification
probability distribution, $P(\mu)$, at redshift $z$ is related to the UPDF by
$P(\mu)=P(\eta)/2|\kappa_{min}|$, where $\eta=1+(\mu-1)/(2|\kappa_{min}|)$, and
$\kappa_{min}$ (the minimum convergence) can be directly computed from the
cosmological parameters ($\Omega_m$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$). We show that the
UPDF can be well approximated by a three-parameter stretched Gaussian
distribution, where the values of the three parameters depend only on
$\xi_\eta$, the variance of $\eta$. In short, all possible weak lensing
probability distributions can be well approximated by a one-parameter family.
We establish this family, normalizing to the numerical ray-shooting results for
a ${\Lambda}$CDM model by Wambsganss et al. (1997). Each alternative
cosmological model is then described by a single function $\xi_\eta(z)$. We
find that this method gives $P(\mu)$ in excellent agreement with numerical
ray-tracing and three-dimensional shear matrix calculations, and provide
numerical fits for three representative models (SCDM, $\Lambda$CDM, and OCDM).
Our results provide an easy, accurate, and efficient method to calculate the
weak lensing magnification distribution of standard candles, and should be
useful in the analysis of future high-redshift supernova data.
[190]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0106113 [pdf] - 880519
Gravitational Wave Emission From Core-Collapse of Massive Stars
Submitted: 2001-06-06, last modified: 2001-09-24
We derive estimates for the characteristics of gravitational radiation from
stellar collapse, using recent models of the core-collapse of Chandrasekhar
mass white dwarfs (accretion induced collapse), core-collapse supernovae and
collapsars, and the collapse of very massive stars (~> 300 Msun). We study
gravitational-wave emission mechanisms using several estimation techniques,
including two-dimensional numerical computation of quadrupole wave emission,
estimates of bar-mode strength, estimates of r-mode emission, and estimates of
waves from black hole ringing. We also review the rate at which the relevant
collapses are believed to occur, which has a major impact on their relevance as
astrophysical sources. Although the latest supernova progenitor simulations
produce cores rotating much slower than those used in the past, we find that
bar-mode and r-mode instabilities from core-collapse supernovae remain among
the leading candidate sources for LIGO-II. Accretion induced collapse (AIC) of
a white dwarf could produce gravitational-wave signals similar to those from
core-collapse. In the models that we examine, such collapses are not unstable
to bar modes; we note that models recently examined by Liu and Lindblom, which
have slightly more angular momentum, are certainly unstable to bar formation.
Because AIC events are probably 1,000 times less common than core-collapse
supernovae, the typical AIC event will be much further away, and thus the
observed waves will be much weaker. In the most optimistic circumstances, we
find it may be possible to detect gravitational waves from the collapse of 300
Msun Population III stars.
[191]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0104440 [pdf] - 42179
Seeing double: strong gravitational lensing of high-redshift supernovae
Submitted: 2001-04-26, last modified: 2001-08-06
With the advent of large, deep surveys, the observation of a strongly
gravitationally lensed supernova becomes increasingly likely. High-redshift
surveys continue apace, with a handful of type Ia supernovae observed to date
at redshifts of one or greater. In addition, a satellite (the
Supernova/Acceleration Probe [SNAP]) has been proposed dedicated to observing
thousands of supernovae per year out to a redshift of 1.7. Although it is
exceedingly unlikely that we will see a multiply-imaged supernova from ongoing
surveys, we find that SNAP would observe at least eight such events per year.
Since having a standard candle is inessential to most lensing studies, SNAP's
large sample of type II supernovae contributes to this rate. Each case of
strong lensing allows for a precise determination of time delays, image
separations, and relative image magnifications, and the SNAP strong-lensing
database will offer measures of $\Omega_m$, $\Omega_\Lambda$, and $H_0$,
independent of SNAP's primary goal of establishing the distance-redshift
relation. These systems also constrain models for the matter density profiles
of galaxies and clusters. Furthermore, lensed type Ia supernovae afford the
opportunity to break the mass-sheet degeneracy found in many lensing
measurements.
[192]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0108009 [pdf] - 43985
Hydrostatic Expansion and Spin Changes During Type I X-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 2001-08-01
We present calculations of the spin-down of a neutron star atmosphere due to
hydrostatic expansion during a Type I X-ray burst. We show that (i) Cumming and
Bildsten overestimated the spin-down of rigidly-rotating atmospheres by a
factor of two, and (ii) general relativity has a small (5-10%) effect on the
angular momentum conservation law. We rescale our results to different neutron
star masses, rotation rates and equations of state, and present some detailed
rotational profiles. Comparing with recent observations of large frequency
shifts in MXB 1658-298 and 4U 1916-053, we find that the spin-down expected if
the atmosphere rotates rigidly is a factor of two to three less than the
observed values. If differential rotation is allowed to persist, we find that
the upper layers of the atmosphere spin down by an amount comparable to the
observed values; however, there is no compelling reason to expect the observed
spin frequency to be that of only the outermost layers. We conclude that
hydrostatic expansion and angular momentum conservation alone cannot account
for the largest frequency shifts observed during Type I bursts.
[193]
oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0105284 [pdf] - 113814
Collisional Dark Matter and Scalar Phantoms
Submitted: 2001-05-27
As has been previously proposed, a minimal modification of the standard
$SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$ theory provides a viable dark matter candidate.
Such a particle, a scalar gauge singlet, is naturally self-interacting---making
it of particular interest given recent developments in astrophysics. We review
this dark matter candidate, with reference to the parameter ranges currently
under discussion.
[194]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9910482 [pdf] - 109036
Limits on the Density of Compact Objects from High Redshift Supernovae
Submitted: 1999-10-27
Due to the effects of gravitational lensing, the magnification distribution
of high redshift supenovae can be a powerful discriminator between smooth dark
matter and dark matter consisting of compact objects. We use high resolution
N-body simulations in combination with the results of simulations with compact
objects to determine the magnification distribution for a Universe with an
arbitrary fraction of the dark matter in compact objects. Using these
distributions we determine the number of type Ia SNe required to measure the
fraction of matter in compact objects. It is possible to determine a 20%
fraction of matter in compact objects with 100-400 well measured SNe at $z \sim
1$, assuming the background cosmological model is well determined.
[195]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9804271 [pdf] - 101152
Gravitational Lensing Limits on the Average Redshift of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Submitted: 1998-04-27, last modified: 1998-09-03
The lack of bright host galaxies in several recently examined gamma-ray burst
(GRB) error boxes suggests that the redshifts of cosmological GRBs may be
significantly higher than previously believed. On the other hand, the
non-detection of multiple images in the BATSE 4B catalog implies an upper limit
on the average redshift <z> of GRBs. Here, we calculate an upper limit to <z>,
independent of the physical model for GRBs, using a new statistical lensing
method that removes distance ambiguities, and thus permits accurate computation
of the lensing rate at high z. The upper limit on <z> depends directly on the
cosmological parameters Omega and Lambda. If there are no multiple images among
the brightest 80% of the first 1802 bursts in the BATSE 4B catalog, then, at
the 95% confidence level, <z> is less than 2.2, 2.8, 4.3, or 5.3 for
(Omega,Lambda) values of (0.3, 0.7), (0.5, 0.5), (0.5, 0.0), or (1.0, 0.0),
respectively. The 68% upper limit to the average redshift is comparable to or
less than the median redshift of GRBs in scenarios in which the GRB rate is
proportional to the rate of star formation, for any cosmology. The uncertainty
in the lensing rate --- arising from uncertainties in the cosmological
parameters and in the number density and average velocity dispersion of
galaxies --- will be reduced significantly in the next few years by a new
generation of experiments and surveys. Moreover, the continued increase in the
number of GRBs observed by BATSE will greatly constrain their redshift
distribution.
[196]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9806124 [pdf] - 101717
Lensing and high-z supernova surveys
Submitted: 1998-06-08, last modified: 1998-08-06
Gravitational lensing causes the distribution of observed brightnesses of
standard candles at a given redshift to be highly non-gaussian. The
distribution is strongly, and asymmetrically, peaked at a value less than the
expected value in a homogeneous Robertson-Walker universe. Therefore, given any
small sample of observations in an inhomogeneous universe, the most likely
observed luminosity is at flux values less than the Robertson-Walker value.
This paper explores the impact of this systematic error due to lensing upon
surveys predicated on measuring standard candle brightnesses. We re-analyze
recent results from the high-z supernova team (Riess et al. 1998), both when
most of the matter in the universe is in the form of compact objects
(represented by the empty-beam expression, corresponding to the maximal case of
lensing), and when the matter is continuously distributed in galaxies. We find
that the best-fit model remains unchanged (at Omega_m=0, Omega_Lambda=0.45),
but the confidence contours change size and shape, becoming larger (and thus
allowing a broader range of parameter space) and dropping towards higher values
of matter density, Omega_m (or correspondingly, lower values of the
cosmological constant, Omega_Lambda). These effects are slight when the matter
is continuously distributed. However, the effects become considerably more
important if most of the matter is in compact objects. For example, neglecting
lensing, the Omega_m=0.5, Omega_Lambda=0.5 model is more than 2 sigma away from
the best fit. In the empty-beam analysis, this cosmology is at 1 sigma.
[197]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9708036 [pdf] - 1462701
A New Method for Determining Cumulative Gravitational Lensing Effects in
Inhomogeneous Universes
Submitted: 1997-08-04, last modified: 1998-05-12
We present a new approach to calculating the statistical distributions for
magnification, shear, and rotation of images of cosmological sources due to
gravitational lensing. In this approach one specifies an underlying
Robertson-Walker cosmological model together with relevant information on the
clumping of matter on scales much smaller than the Hubble radius. The geodesic
deviation equation is then integrated backwards in time until the desired
redshift is reached, using a Monte Carlo procedure wherein each photon beam in
effect ``creates its own universe'' as it propagates. The approach is somewhat
similar to that used in ``Swiss cheese'' models, but the ``cheese'' has been
completely eliminated, the matter distribution in the ``voids'' need not be
spherically symmetric, and the total mass in each void need equal the
corresponding Robertson-Walker mass only on average. We show that when the
matter in the universe consists of point masses, the statistical distributions
of the lensing images are essentially independent of both the mass spectrum and
clustering properties of the point masses, provided that the clustering is
spherical. We apply our results (i) to argue that the positive correlation
recently found between quasar luminosity and the number of absorption line
systems is not likely to be due to lensing, and (ii) to determine the amount of
``noise'' and possible bias produced by lensing in measurements of $q_0$ using
distant supernovae.
[198]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9503039 [pdf] - 1469236
Photon Statistics Limits for Earth-Based Parallax Measurements of MACHO
Events
Submitted: 1995-03-08, last modified: 1995-03-12
We analyze the limitations imposed by photon counting statistics on
extracting useful information about MACHOs from Earth-based parallax
observations of microlensing events. We find that if one or more large (say
$2.5\,\rm m$) telescopes are dedicated to observing a MACHO event for several
nights near maximum amplification, then it is possible, in principle, to
measure the velocity of the MACHO well enough to distinguish between disk and
halo populations for events with $\omega {A_m}\!^2 \gta 1\,\rm day^{-1}$, where
$\omega^{-1}$ denotes the timescale of the event and $A_m$ denotes its maximum
amplification. Thus, if it turns out to be possible to reduce all other sources
of error to below that of photon statistics, it may be feasible to do useful
Earth-based parallax observations for high amplification events.
