Normalized to: Holmelin, V.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.6898 [pdf] - 1124483
Can planetary instability explain the Kepler dichotomy?
Submitted: 2012-06-28, last modified: 2012-08-18
The planet candidates discovered by the Kepler mission provide a rich sample
to constrain the architectures and relative inclinations of planetary systems
within approximately 0.5 AU of their host stars. We use the triple-transit
systems from the Kepler 16-months data as templates for physical triple-planet
systems and perform synthetic transit observations. We find that all the Kepler
triple-transit and double-transit systems can be produced from the
triple-planet templates, given a low mutual inclination of around five degrees.
Our analysis shows that the Kepler data contains a population of planets larger
than four Earth radii in single-transit systems that can not arise from the
triple-planet templates. We explore the hypothesis that high-mass counterparts
of the triple-transit systems underwent dynamical instability to produce a
population of massive double-planet systems of moderately high mutual
inclination. We perform N-body simulations of mass-boosted triple-planet
systems and observe how the systems heat up and lose planets, most frequently
by planet-planet collisions, yielding transits in agreement with the large
planets in the Kepler single-transit systems. The resulting population of
massive double-planet systems can nevertheless not explain the additional
excess of low-mass planets among the observed single-transit systems and the
lack of gas-giant planets in double-transit and triple-transit systems.
Planetary instability of systems of triple gas-giant planets can be behind part
of the dichotomy between systems hosting one or more small planets and those
hosting a single giant planet. The main part of the dichotomy, however, is more
likely to have arisen already during planet formation when the formation,
migration or scattering of a massive planet, triggered above a threshold
metallicity, suppressed the formation of other planets in sub-AU orbits.