Normalized to: Holm, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.02900 [pdf] - 1300165
The Dark Energy Camera
Flaugher, B.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Honscheid, K.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Alvarez, O.;
Angstadt, R.;
Annis, J. T.;
Antonik, M.;
Ballester, O.;
Beaufore, L.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bernstein, R. A.;
Bigelow, B.;
Bonati, M.;
Boprie, D.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E. J.;
Campa, J.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Castander, F. J.;
Castilla, J.;
Cease, H.;
Cela-Ruiz, J. M.;
Chappa, S.;
Chi, E.;
Cooper, C.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Dede, E.;
Derylo, G.;
DePoy, D. L.;
de Vicente, J.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eiting, J.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Emes, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Finley, D. A.;
Flores, R.;
Frieman, J.;
Gerdes, D.;
Gladders, M. D.;
Gregory, B.;
Gutierrez, G. R.;
Hao, J.;
Holland, S. E.;
Holm, S.;
Huffman, D.;
Jackson, C.;
James, D. J.;
Jonas, M.;
Karcher, A.;
Karliner, I.;
Kent, S.;
Kessler, R.;
Kozlovsky, M.;
Kron, R. G.;
Kubik, D.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuk, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lathrop, A.;
Lee, J.;
Levi, M. E.;
Lewis, P.;
Li, T. S.;
Mandrichenko, I.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martinez, G.;
Merritt, K. W.;
Miquel, R.;
Munoz, F.;
Neilsen, E. H.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Olsen, J.;
Palio, N.;
Patton, K.;
Peoples, J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Rauch, J.;
Reil, K.;
Rheault, J. -P.;
Roe, N. A.;
Rogers, H.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R. H.;
Schmidt, R.;
Schmitt, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Schultz, K.;
Schurter, P.;
Scott, L.;
Serrano, S.;
Shaw, T. M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Stefanik, A.;
Stuermer, W.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sypniewski, A.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Tighe, R.;
Tran, C.;
Tucker, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, G.;
Watson, M.;
Weaverdyck, C.;
Wester, W.;
Woods, R.;
Yanny, B.
Submitted: 2015-04-11
The Dark Energy Camera is a new imager with a 2.2-degree diameter field of
view mounted at the prime focus of the Victor M. Blanco 4-meter telescope on
Cerro Tololo near La Serena, Chile. The camera was designed and constructed by
the Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, and meets or exceeds the stringent
requirements designed for the wide-field and supernova surveys for which the
collaboration uses it. The camera consists of a five element optical corrector,
seven filters, a shutter with a 60 cm aperture, and a CCD focal plane of 250
micron thick fully-depleted CCDs cooled inside a vacuum Dewar. The 570 Mpixel
focal plane comprises 62 2kx4k CCDs for imaging and 12 2kx2k CCDs for guiding
and focus. The CCDs have 15 microns x15 microns pixels with a plate scale of
0.263 arc sec per pixel. A hexapod system provides state-of-the-art focus and
alignment capability. The camera is read out in 20 seconds with 6-9 electrons
readout noise. This paper provides a technical description of the camera's
engineering, construction, installation, and current status.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.01611 [pdf] - 1037584
Prudence in estimating coherence between planetary, solar and climate
oscillations
Submitted: 2015-04-07
There are claims that there is correlation between the speed of center of
mass of the solar system and the global temperature anomaly. This is partly
grounded in data analysis and partly in a priori expectations. The magnitude
squared coherence function is the proper measure for testing such claims. It is
not hard to produce high coherence estimates at periods around 15--22 and
50--60 years between these data sets. This is done in two independent ways, by
wavelets and by a periodogram method. But does a coherence of high value mean
that there is coherence of high significance? In order to investigate that,
four different measures for significance are studied. Due to the periodic
nature of the data, only Monte Carlo simulation based on a non-parametric
random phase method is appropriate.
None of the high values of coherence then turn out to be significant. Coupled
with a lack of a physical mechanism that can connect these phenomena, the
planetary hypothesis is therefore dismissed.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1307.1086 [pdf] - 813794
On the alleged coherence between the global temperature and the sun's
movement
Submitted: 2013-07-03, last modified: 2014-04-23
It has recently been claimed that there is significant coherence between the
spectral peaks of the global temperature series over the last 160 years and
those of the speed of the solar center of mass at periods of 10-10.5, 20-21, 30
and 60-62 years. Here it is shown that these claims are based on a comparison
between spectral peaks in spectral estimates that assume that the global
temperature data contains time-invariant spectral lines. However,
time-frequency analysis using both windowed periodograms and the maximum
entropy method shows that this is not the case. An estimate of the magnitude
squared coherence shows instead that under certain conditions only coherence at
a period of 15-17 years can be found in the data. As this result builds on a
low number of independent averages and also is unwarranted from any physical
model it is doubtful whether it is significant.