Normalized to: Holl, B.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.09416 [pdf] - 2120079
Empirical completeness assessment of the Gaia DR2, Pan-STARRS 1 and
ASAS-SN-II RR Lyrae catalogues
Submitted: 2020-06-16
RR Lyrae stars are an important and widely used tracer of the most ancient
populations of our Galaxy, mainly due to their standard candle nature. The
availability of large scale surveys of variable stars is allowing us to trace
the structure of our entire Galaxy, even in previously inaccessible areas like
the Galactic disc. In this work we aim to provide an empirical assessment of
the completeness of the three largest RR Lyrae catalogues available: Gaia DR2,
PanSTARRS-1 and ASAS-SN-II. Using a joint probabilistic analysis of the three
surveys we compute 2D and 3D completeness maps in each survey's full magnitude
range. At the bright end (G<13) we find ASAS-SN-II and Gaia are near 100%
complete in RRab at high latitude (|b|>20deg); ASAS-SN-II has the best
completeness at low latitude for RRab and at all latitudes for RRc. At the
faint end (G>13), Gaia DR2 is the most complete catalogue for both RR Lyrae
types, at any latitude, with median completeness rates of 95% (RRab) and >85%
(RRc) outside the ecliptic plane (|\beta|>25deg). We confirm a high and uniform
completeness of PanSTARRS-1 RR Lyrae at 91% (RRab) and 82% (RRc) down to G~18,
and provide the first estimate of its completeness at low galactic latitude
(|b|<20deg) at an estimated median 65% (RRab) and 50-60% (RRc). Our results are
publicly available as 2D and 3D completeness maps, and as functions to evaluate
each survey's completeness versus distance or per line-of sight.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.14433 [pdf] - 2086999
Completeness of the Gaia-verse I: when and where were Gaia's eyes on the
sky during DR2?
Submitted: 2020-04-29
The Gaia space mission is crafting revolutionary astrometric, photometric and
spectroscopic catalogues that will allow us to map our Galaxy, but only if we
know the completeness of this Gaia-verse of catalogues: what stars does it
contain and what stars is it missing? We argue that the completeness is driven
by Gaia's spinning-and-precessing scanning law and will apply this principle to
the Gaia-verse over this series. We take a first step by identifying the
periods in time that did not contribute any measurements to Gaia DR2; these
gaps create ribbons of incompleteness across the sky that will bias any study
that ignores them, although some of these gaps may be filled in future data
releases. Our first approach was to use the variable star photometry to
identify the 94 gaps longer than 1% of a day. Our second approach was to
predict the number of observations of every point on the sky, which in
comparison to the reported number of detections revealed additional gaps in the
astrometry and spectroscopy. Making these predictions required us to make the
most precise, publicly-available determination of the Gaia scanning law. Using
this scanning law, we further identified that most stars fainter than $G=22$ in
DR2 have spurious magnitudes due to a miscalibration resulting from a
thunderstorm over Madrid. Our list of gaps and precision scanning law will
allow astronomers to know when Gaia's eye was truly on their binary star,
exoplanet or microlensing event during the time period of the second data
release.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09382 [pdf] - 2078647
Gaia Data Release 2: Variable stars in the colour-absolute magnitude
diagram
Gaia Collaboration;
Eyer, L.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Audard, M.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Glass, F.;
Marchal, O.;
Grenon, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Holl, B.;
Clementini, G.;
Aerts, C.;
Mazeh, T.;
Evans, D. W.;
Szabados, L.;
co-authors, 438
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2020-04-16
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than 1.6
billion sources with G ~ 21 mag. We showcase stellar variability across the
Galactic colour-absolute magnitude diagram (CaMD), focusing on pulsating,
eruptive, and cataclysmic variables, as well as on stars exhibiting variability
due to rotation and eclipses. We illustrate the locations of variable star
classes, variable object fractions, and typical variability amplitudes
throughout the CaMD and illustrate how variability-related changes in colour
and brightness induce `motions' using 22 months worth of calibrated
photometric, spectro-photometric, and astrometric Gaia data of stars with
significant parallax. To ensure a large variety of variable star classes to
populate the CaMD, we crossmatch Gaia sources with known variable stars. We
also used the statistics and variability detection modules of the Gaia
variability pipeline. Corrections for interstellar extinction are not
implemented in this article. Gaia enables the first investigation of Galactic
variable star populations across the CaMD on a similar, if not larger, scale
than previously done in the Magellanic Clouds. Despite observed colours not
being reddening corrected, we clearly see distinct regions where variable stars
occur and determine variable star fractions to within Gaia's current detection
thresholds. Finally, we show the most complete description of
variability-induced motion within the CaMD to date. Gaia enables novel insights
into variability phenomena for an unprecedented number of stars, which will
benefit the understanding of stellar astrophysics. The CaMD of Galactic
variable stars provides crucial information on physical origins of variability
in a way previously accessible only for Galactic star clusters or external
galaxies.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.07659 [pdf] - 2015879
Gaia's revolution in stellar variability
Eyer, L.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Rohrbasser, L.;
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Garcia-Lario, P.;
Gavras, P.;
Clementini, G.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ripepi, V.;
Wyrzykowski, L.
Submitted: 2019-12-16
Stellar variability studies are now reaching a completely new level thanks to
ESA's Gaia mission, which enables us to locate many variable stars in the
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and determine the various instability strips/bands.
Furthermore, this mission also allows us to detect, characterise and classify
many millions of new variable stars thanks to its very unique nearly
simultaneous multi-epoch survey with different instruments (photometer,
spectro-photometer, radial velocity spectrometer). An overview of what can be
found in literature in terms of mostly data products by the Gaia consortium is
given. This concerns the various catalogues of variable stars derived from the
Gaia time series and also the location and motion of variable stars in the
observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. In addition, we provide a list of a
few thousands of variable white dwarf candidates derived from the DR2 published
data, among them probably many hundreds of new pulsating white dwarfs. On a
very different topic, we also show how Gaia allows us to reveal the 3D
structures of and around the Milky Way thanks to the RR Lyrae stars.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1911.09114 [pdf] - 2001949
Multivariate Time-series Analysis of Variable Objects in the Gaia
Mission
Submitted: 2019-11-20
In astronomy, we are witnessing an enormous increase in the number of source
detections, precision, and diversity of measurements. Additionally, multi-epoch
data is becoming the norm, making time-series analyses an important aspect of
current astronomy. The Gaia mission is an outstanding example of a multi-epoch
survey that provides measurements in a large diversity of domains, with its
broad-band photometry; spectrophotometry in blue and red (used to derive
astrophysical parameters); spectroscopy (employed to infer radial velocities, v
sin(i), and other astrophysical parameters); and its extremely precise
astrometry. Most of all that information is provided for sources covering the
entire sky. Here, we present several properties related to the Gaia time
series, such as the time sampling; the different types of measurements; the
Gaia G, G BP and G RP-band photometry; and Gaia-inspired studies using the
CORrelation-RAdial-VELocities data to assess the potential of the information
on the radial velocity, the FWHM, and the contrast of the cross-correlation
function. We also present techniques (which are used or are under development)
that optimize the extraction of astrophysical information from the different
instruments of Gaia, such as the principal component analysis and the
multi-response regression. The detailed understanding of the behavior of the
observed phenomena in the various measurement domains can lead to richer and
more precise characterization of the Gaia data, including the definition of
more informative attributes that serve as input to (our) machine-learning
algorithms.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.08028 [pdf] - 1981876
ESA Voyage 2050 white paper -- Faint objects in motion: the new frontier
of high precision astrometry
Malbet, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Alves, J.;
Boehm, C.;
Brown, W.;
Chemin, L.;
Correia, A.;
Courbin, F.;
Darling, J.;
Diaferio, A.;
Fortin, M.;
Fridlund, M.;
Gnedin, O.;
Holl, B.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Léger, A.;
Labadie, L.;
Laskar, J.;
Mamon, G.;
McArthur, B.;
Michalik, D.;
Moitinho, A.;
Oertel, M.;
Ostorero, L.;
Schneider, J.;
Scott, P.;
Shao, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Tomsick, J.;
Valluri, M.;
Wyse, R.
Submitted: 2019-10-12
Sky survey telescopes and powerful targeted telescopes play complementary
roles in astronomy. In order to investigate the nature and characteristics of
the motions of very faint objects, a flexibly-pointed instrument capable of
high astrometric accuracy is an ideal complement to current astrometric surveys
and a unique tool for precision astrophysics. Such a space-based mission will
push the frontier of precision astrometry from evidence of earth-massed
habitable worlds around the nearest starts, and also into distant Milky way
objects up to the Local Group of galaxies. As we enter the era of the James
Webb Space Telescope and the new ground-based, adaptive-optics-enabled giant
telescopes, by obtaining these high precision measurements on key objects that
Gaia could not reach, a mission that focuses on high precision astrometry
science can consolidate our theoretical understanding of the local universe,
enable extrapolation of physical processes to remote redshifts, and derive a
much more consistent picture of cosmological evolution and the likely fate of
our cosmos. Already several missions have been proposed to address the science
case of faint objects in motion using high precision astrometry ESA missions:
NEAT for M3, micro-NEAT for S1 mission, and Theia for M4 and M5. Additional new
mission configurations adapted with technological innovations could be
envisioned to pursue accurate measurements of these extremely small motions.
The goal of this white paper is to address the fundamental science questions
that are at stake when we focus on the motions of faint sky objects and to
briefly review quickly instrumentation and mission profiles.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.08542 [pdf] - 1901957
Triage of Astrometric Binaries - how to find triple systems and dormant
black-hole secondaries in the Gaia orbits
Submitted: 2019-05-21
Preparing for the expected wealth of Gaia detections, we consider here a
simple algorithm for classifying unresolved astrometric binaries with
main-sequence (MS) primary into three classes: binaries with a probable MS
secondary, with two possible values for the mass ratio; probable hierarchical
triple MS systems with an astrometric secondary as a close binary, with a
limited range of mass-ratio values; and binaries with a compact-object
secondary, with a minimal value of the mass ratio. This is done by defining a
unit-less observational parameter 'Astrometric Mass-Ratio Function' (AMRF),
$\mathcal{A}$, of a binary, based on primary-mass estimation, in addition to
the astrometric parameters - the angular semi-major axis, the period and the
parallax. We derive the $\mathcal{A}$ value that differentiates the three
classes by forward modeling representative binaries of each class, assuming
some mass-luminosity relation.To demonstrate the potential of the algorithm, we
consider the orbits of 98 Hipparcos astrometric binaries with main-sequence
primaries, using the Hipparcos parallaxes and the primary-mass estimates. For
systems with known spectroscopic orbital solution, our results are consistent
with the spectroscopic elements, validating the suggested approach. The
algorithm will be able to identify hierarchical triple systems and dormant
neutron-star and black-hole companions in the Gaia astrometric binaries.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.03919 [pdf] - 1885473
Gaia Data Release 2: All-sky classification of high-amplitude pulsating
stars
Rimoldini, L.;
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Roelens, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Regibo, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Molinaro, R.;
Garofalo, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Plachy, E.;
Juhász, Á.;
Szabados, L.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Teyssier, D.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-11-09, last modified: 2019-05-14
More than half a million of the 1.69 billion sources in Gaia Data Release 2
(DR2) are published with photometric time series that exhibit light variations
during the 22 months of observation. An all-sky classification of common
high-amplitude pulsators (Cepheids, long-period variables, Delta Scuti / SX
Phoenicis, and RR Lyrae stars) is provided for stars with brightness variations
greater than 0.1 mag in G band. A semi-supervised classification approach was
employed, firstly training multi-stage random forest classifiers with sources
of known types in the literature, followed by a preliminary classification of
the Gaia data and a second training phase that included a selection of the
first classification results to improve the representation of some classes,
before the improved classifiers were applied to the Gaia data. Dedicated
validation classifiers were used to reduce the level of contamination in the
published results. A relevant fraction of objects were not yet sufficiently
sampled for reliable Fourier series decomposition, consequently classifiers
were based on features derived from statistics of photometric time series in
the G, BP, and RP bands, as well as from some astrometric parameters. The
published classification results include 195,780 RR Lyrae stars, 150,757
long-period variables, 8550 Cepheids, and 8882 Delta Scuti / SX Phoenicis
stars. All of these results represent candidates whose completeness and
contamination are described as a function of variability type and
classification reliability. Results are expressed in terms of class labels and
classification scores, which are available in the vari_classifier_result table
of the Gaia archive.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02079 [pdf] - 1911148
Gaia Data Release 2: Specific characterisation and validation of all-sky
Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Molinaro, R.;
Garofalo, A.;
Muraveva, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Audard, M.;
Holl, B.;
Leccia, S.;
Marconi, M.;
Musella, I.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Eyer, L.;
De Ridder, J.;
Regibo, S.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Szabados, L.;
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.
Submitted: 2018-05-05, last modified: 2018-10-29
The Gaia second Data Release (DR2) presents a first mapping of full-sky RR
Lyrae stars and Cepheids observed by the spacecraft during the initial 22
months of science operations. The Specific Object Study (SOS) pipeline,
developed to validate and fully characterise Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars (SOS
Cep&RRL) observed by Gaia, has been presented in the documentation and papers
accompanying the Gaia first Data Release. Here we describe how the SOS pipeline
was modified to allow for processing the Gaia multiband (G, G_BP and G_RP) time
series photometry of all-sky candidate variables and produce specific results
for confirmed RR Lyrae stars and Cepheids that are published in the DR2
catalogue. The SOS Cep&RRL processing uses tools such as the period-amplitude
and the period-luminosity relations in the G band. For the analysis of the Gaia
DR2 candidates we also used tools based on the G_BP and G_RP photometry, such
as the period-Wesenheit relation in (G,G_RP). Multiband time series photometry
and characterisation by the SOS Cep&RRL pipeline are published in Gaia DR2 for
150,359 such variables (9,575 classified as Cepheids and 140,784 as RR Lyrae
stars) distributed all over the sky. The sample includes variables in 87
globular clusters and 14 dwarf galaxies. To the best of our knowledge, as of 25
April 2018, variability of 50,570 of these sources (350 Cepheids and 50,220 RR
Lyrae stars) is not known in the literature, hence likely they are new
discoveries by Gaia. An estimate of the interstellar absorption is published
for 54,272 fundamental-mode RR Lyrae stars from a relation based on the G-band
amplitude and the pulsation period. Metallicities derived from the Fourier
parameters of the light curves are also released for 64,932 RR Lyrae stars and
3,738 fundamental-mode classical Cepheids with period shorter than 6.3 days.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00747 [pdf] - 1799831
Gaia Data Release 2. Short-timescale variability processing and analysis
Roelens, M.;
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Audard, M.;
Guy, L.;
Holl, B.;
Evans, D. W.;
Riello, M.;
De Angeli, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Wevers, T.
Submitted: 2018-05-02, last modified: 2018-08-27
The Gaia DR2 sample of short-timescale variable candidates results from the
investigation of the first 22 months of Gaia photometry for a subsample of
sources at the Gaia faint end. For this exercise, we limited ourselves to the
case of suspected rapid periodic variability. Our study combines
fast-variability detection through variogram analysis, high-frequency search by
means of least-squares periodograms, and empirical selection based on the
investigation of specific sources seen through the Gaia eyes (e.g. known
variables or visually identified objects with peculiar features in their light
curves). The progressive definition and validation of this selection criterion
also benefited from supplementary ground-based photometric monitoring of a few
preliminary candidates, performed at the Flemish Mercator telescope (Canary
Islands, Spain) between August and November 2017. We publish a list of 3,018
short-timescale variable candidates, spread throughout the sky, with a
false-positive rate up to 10-20% in the Magellanic Clouds, and a more
significant but justifiable contamination from longer-period variables between
19% and 50%, depending on the area of the sky. Although its completeness is
limited to about 0.05%, this first sample of Gaia short-timescale variables
recovers some very interesting known short-period variables, such as
post-common envelope binaries or cataclysmic variables, and brings to light
some fascinating, newly discovered variable sources. In the perspective of
future Gaia data releases, several improvements of the short-timescale
variability processing are considered, by enhancing the existing variogram and
period-search algorithms or by classifying the identified candidates.
Nonetheless, the encouraging outcome of our Gaia DR2 analysis demonstrates the
power of this mission for such fast-variability studies, and opens great
perspectives for this domain of astrophysics.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.02035 [pdf] - 1767420
Gaia Data Release 2: The first Gaia catalogue of long-period variable
candidates
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lorenz, D.;
Audard, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Holl, B.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Regibo, S.;
Roelens, M.;
Sarro, L. M.
Submitted: 2018-05-05, last modified: 2018-07-27
Gaia DR2 provides a unique all-sky catalogue of 550'737 variable stars, of
which 151'761 are long-period variable (LPV) candidates with G variability
amplitudes larger than 0.2 mag (5-95% quantile range). About one-fifth of the
LPV candidates are Mira candidates, the majority of the rest are semi-regular
variable candidates. For each source, G, BP , and RP photometric time-series
are published, together with some LPV-specific attributes for the subset of
89'617 candidates with periods in G longer than 60 days. We describe this first
Gaia catalogue of LPV candidates, and present various validation checks.
Various samples of LPVs were used to validate the catalogue: a sample of
well-studied very bright LPVs with light curves from the AAVSO that are partly
contemporaneous with Gaia light curves, a sample of Gaia LPV candidates with
good parallaxes, the ASAS_SN catalogue of LPVs, and the OGLE catalogues of LPVs
towards the Magellanic Clouds and the Galactic bulge. The analyses of these
samples show a good agreement between Gaia DR2 and literature periods. The same
is globally true for bolometric corrections of M-type stars. The main
contaminant of our DR2 catalogue comes from young stellar objects (YSOs) in the
solar vicinity (within ~1 kpc), although their number in the whole catalogue is
only at the percent level. A cautionary note is provided about
parallax-dependent LPV attributes published in the catalogue. This first Gaia
catalogue of LPVs approximately doubles the number of known LPVs with
amplitudes larger than 0.2 mag, despite the conservative candidate selection
criteria that prioritise low contamination over high completeness, and despite
the limited DR2 time coverage compared to the long periods characteristic of
LPVs. It also contains a small set of YSO candidates, which offers the
serendipitous opportunity to study these objects at an early stage of the Gaia
data releases.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09373 [pdf] - 1767409
Gaia Data Release 2: Summary of the variability processing & analysis
results
Holl, B.;
Audard, M.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Clementini, G.;
De Ridder, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Guy, L. P.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Roelens, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Garofalo, A.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Lopez, M.;
Molinaro, R.;
Muraveva, T.;
Panahi, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Aerts, C.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Charnas, J.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Busso, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
Glass, F.;
Grenon, M.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Kochoska, A.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Leccia, S.;
Lorenz, D.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalk, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
Messina, S.;
Mignard, F.;
Moitinho, A.;
Molnár, L.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Musella, I.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Ordóñez, D.;
Pagano, I.;
Palaversa, L.;
Pawlak, M.;
Plachy, E.;
Prša, A.;
Riello, M.;
Süveges, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Votruba, V.;
Eyer, L.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-07-06
The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2): we summarise the processing and results of the
identification of variable source candidates of RR Lyrae stars, Cepheids, long
period variables (LPVs), rotation modulation (BY Dra-type) stars, delta Scuti &
SX Phoenicis stars, and short-timescale variables. In this release we aim to
provide useful but not necessarily complete samples of candidates.
The processed Gaia data consist of the G, BP, and RP photometry during the
first 22 months of operations as well as positions and parallaxes. Various
methods from classical statistics, data mining and time series analysis were
applied and tailored to the specific properties of Gaia data, as well as
various visualisation tools.
The DR2 variability release contains: 228'904 RR Lyrae stars, 11'438
Cepheids, 151'761 LPVs, 147'535 stars with rotation modulation, 8'882 delta
Scuti & SX Phoenicis stars, and 3'018 short-timescale variables. These results
are distributed over a classification and various Specific Object Studies (SOS)
tables in the Gaia archive, along with the three-band time series and
associated statistics for the underlying 550'737 unique sources. We estimate
that about half of them are newly identified variables. The variability type
completeness varies strongly as function of sky position due to the non-uniform
sky coverage and intermediate calibration level of this data. The probabilistic
and automated nature of this work implies certain completeness and
contamination rates which are quantified so that users can anticipate their
effects. This means that even well-known variable sources can be missed or
misidentified in the published data.
The DR2 variability release only represents a small subset of the processed
data. Future releases will include more variable sources and data products;
however, DR2 shows the (already) very high quality of the data and great
promise for variability studies.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.00421 [pdf] - 1736369
Gaia Data Release 2: Rotational modulation in late-type dwarfs
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Distefano, E.;
Messina, S.;
Pagano, I.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Holl, B.;
de Fombelle, M. Audard G. J.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Marchal, O.;
Mowlavi, N.
Submitted: 2018-05-01, last modified: 2018-06-27
We present the methods devised to identify the BY Dra variables candidates in
Gaia DR2 and infer their variability parameters. BY Dra candidates are
pre-selected from their position in the HR diagram, built from Gaia parallaxes,
$G$ magnitudes, and $(G_{BP} - G_{RP})$ colours. Since the time evolution of
the stellar active region can disrupt the coherence of the signal, segments not
much longer than their expected evolution timescale are extracted from the
entire photometric time-series and period search algorithms are applied to each
segment. For the Gaia DR2, we select sources having similar period in at least
two segments as candidates BY Dra. Results are further filtered considering the
time series phase coverage and the expected approximate light curve shape. Gaia
DR2 includes rotational periods and modulation amplitudes of 147 535 BY Dra
candidates. The data unveil the existence of two populations with distinctive
period and amplitude distributions. The sample covers 38% of the whole sky when
divided in bins (HEALPix) of $\approx$0.84 square degrees and we estimate that
represents 0.7 -- 5 % of all BY Dra stars potentially detectable by Gaia. The
preliminary data contained in Gaia DR2 illustrate the vast and unique
information that the mission is going to provide on stellar rotation and
magnetic activity. This information, complemented by Gaia exquisite parallaxes,
proper motions, and astrophysical parameter, is opening new and unique
perspectives for our understanding of the evolution of stellar angular momentum
and dynamo action.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.04079 [pdf] - 1664617
All-sky RR Lyrae Stars in the Gaia Data
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Eyer, Laurent;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Holl, Berry;
Audard, Marc;
Guy, Leanne P.;
de Fombelle, Grégory Jevardat;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Marchal, Olivier;
Clementini, Gisella;
Ripepi, Vincenzo;
Garofalo, Alessia;
Molinaro, Roberto;
Muraveva, Tatiana;
Poretti, Ennio;
Molnár, László;
Plachy, Emese;
Juhász, Áron L.;
Szabados, László;
De Ridder, Joris;
Regibo, Sara;
Baro, Luis Manuel Sarro;
del Fresno, Mauro López
Submitted: 2018-04-11
The second Gaia data release is expected to contain data products from about
22 months of observation. Based on these data, we aim to provide an advance
publication of a full-sky Gaia map of RR Lyrae stars. Although comprehensive,
these data still contain a significant fraction of sources which are
insufficiently sampled for Fourier series decomposition of the periodic light
variations. The challenges in the identification of RR Lyrae candidates with
(much) fewer than 20 field-of-view transits are described. General
considerations of the results, their limitations, and interpretation are
presented together with prospects for improvement in subsequent Gaia data
releases.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.03778 [pdf] - 1584573
PLATO as it is: a legacy mission for Galactic archaeology
Miglio, A.;
Chiappini, C.;
Mosser, B.;
Davies, G. R.;
Freeman, K.;
Girardi, L.;
Jofre, P.;
Kawata, D.;
Rendle, B. M.;
Valentini, M.;
Casagrande, L.;
Chaplin, W. J.;
Gilmore, G.;
Hawkins, K.;
Holl, B.;
Appourchaux, T.;
Belkacem, K.;
Bossini, D.;
Brogaard, K.;
Goupil, M. -J.;
Montalban, J.;
Noels, A.;
Anders, F.;
Rodrigues, T.;
Piotto, G.;
Pollacco, D.;
Rauer, H.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Avelino, P. P.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Barban, C.;
Barbuy, B.;
Basu, S.;
Baudin, F.;
Benomar, O.;
Bienayme, O.;
Binney, J.;
Bland-Hawthorn, J.;
Bressan, A.;
Cacciari, C.;
Campante, T. L.;
Cassisi, S.;
Christensen-Dalsgaard, J.;
Combes, F.;
Creevey, O.;
Cunha, M. S.;
de Jong, R. S.;
de Laverny, P.;
Degl'Innocenti, S.;
Deheuvels, S.;
Depagne, E.;
DeRidder, J.;
DiMatteo, P.;
Di Mauro, M. P.;
Dupret, M. -A.;
Eggenberger, P.;
Elsworth, Y.;
Famaey, B.;
Feltzing, S.;
Garcia, R. A.;
Gerhard, O.;
Gibson, B. K.;
Gizon, L.;
Haywood, M.;
Handberg, R.;
Heiter, U.;
Hekker, S.;
Huber, D.;
Ibata, R.;
Katz, D.;
Kawaler, S. D.;
Kjeldsen, H.;
Kurtz, D. W.;
Lagarde, N.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lund, M. N.;
Majewski, S. R.;
Marigo, P.;
Martig, M.;
Mathur, S.;
Minchev, I.;
Morel, T.;
Ortolani, S.;
Pinsonneault, M. H.;
Plez, B.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Pricopi, D.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Reyle, C.;
Robin, A.;
Roxburgh, I. W.;
Salaris, M.;
Santiago, B. X.;
Schiavon, R.;
Serenelli, A.;
Sharma, S.;
Aguirre, V. Silva;
Soubiran, C.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Stello, D.;
Strassmeier, K. G.;
Ventura, P.;
Ventura, R.;
Walton, N. A.;
Worley, C. C.
Submitted: 2017-06-12, last modified: 2017-07-07
Deciphering the assembly history of the Milky Way is a formidable task, which
becomes possible only if one can produce high-resolution
chrono-chemo-kinematical maps of the Galaxy. Data from large-scale astrometric
and spectroscopic surveys will soon provide us with a well-defined view of the
current chemo-kinematical structure of the Milky Way, but will only enable a
blurred view on the temporal sequence that led to the present-day Galaxy. As
demonstrated by the (ongoing) exploitation of data from the pioneering
photometric missions CoRoT, Kepler, and K2, asteroseismology provides the way
forward: solar-like oscillating giants are excellent evolutionary clocks thanks
to the availability of seismic constraints on their mass and to the tight
age-initial-mass relation they adhere to. In this paper we identify five key
outstanding questions relating to the formation and evolution of the Milky Way
that will need precise and accurate ages for large samples of stars to be
addressed, and we identify the requirements in terms of number of targets and
the precision on the stellar properties that are needed to tackle such
questions. By quantifying the asteroseismic yields expected from PLATO for
red-giant stars, we demonstrate that these requirements are within the
capabilities of the current instrument design, provided that observations are
sufficiently long to identify the evolutionary state and allow robust and
precise determination of acoustic-mode frequencies. This will allow us to
harvest data of sufficient quality to reach a 10% precision in age. This is a
fundamental pre-requisite to then reach the more ambitious goal of a similar
level of accuracy, which will only be possible if we have to hand a careful
appraisal of systematic uncertainties on age deriving from our limited
understanding of stellar physics, a goal which conveniently falls within the
main aims of PLATO's core science.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01348 [pdf] - 1585537
Theia: Faint objects in motion or the new astrometry frontier
The Theia Collaboration;
Boehm, Celine;
Krone-Martins, Alberto;
Amorim, Antonio;
Anglada-Escude, Guillem;
Brandeker, Alexis;
Courbin, Frederic;
Ensslin, Torsten;
Falcao, Antonio;
Freese, Katherine;
Holl, Berry;
Labadie, Lucas;
Leger, Alain;
Malbet, Fabien;
Mamon, Gary;
McArthur, Barbara;
Mora, Alcione;
Shao, Michael;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Spolyar, Douglas;
Villaver, Eva;
Albertus, Conrado;
Bertone, Stefano;
Bouy, Herve;
Boylan-Kolchin, Michael;
Brown, Anthony;
Brown, Warren;
Cardoso, Vitor;
Chemin, Laurent;
Claudi, Riccardo;
Correia, Alexandre C. M.;
Crosta, Mariateresa;
Crouzier, Antoine;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
Damasso, Mario;
da Silva, Antonio;
Davies, Melvyn;
Das, Payel;
Dayal, Pratika;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Diaferio, Antonaldo;
Erickcek, Adrienne;
Fairbairn, Malcolm;
Fortin, Morgane;
Fridlund, Malcolm;
Garcia, Paulo;
Gnedin, Oleg;
Goobar, Ariel;
Gordo, Paulo;
Goullioud, Renaud;
Hambly, Nigel;
Hara, Nathan;
Hobbs, David;
Hog, Erik;
Holland, Andrew;
Ibata, Rodrigo;
Jordi, Carme;
Klioner, Sergei;
Kopeikin, Sergei;
Lacroix, Thomas;
Laskar, Jacques;
Poncin-Lafitte, Christophe Le;
Luri, Xavier;
Majumdar, Subhabrata;
Makarov, Valeri;
Massey, Richard;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Michalik, Daniel;
de Almeida, Andre Moitinho;
Mourao, Ana;
Moustakas, Leonidas;
Murray, Neil;
Muterspaugh, Matthew;
Oertel, Micaela;
Ostorero, Luisa;
Perez-Garcia, Angeles;
Platais, Imants;
de Mora, Jordi Portell i;
Quirrenbach, Andreas;
Randall, Lisa;
Read, Justin;
Regos, Eniko;
Rory, Barnes;
Rybicki, Krzysztof;
Scott, Pat;
Schneider, Jean;
Scholtz, Jakub;
Siebert, Arnaud;
Tereno, Ismael;
Tomsick, John;
Traub, Wesley;
Valluri, Monica;
Walker, Matt;
Walton, Nicholas;
Watkins, Laura;
White, Glenn;
Evans, Dafydd Wyn;
Wyrzykowski, Lukasz;
Wyse, Rosemary
Submitted: 2017-07-02
In the context of the ESA M5 (medium mission) call we proposed a new
satellite mission, Theia, based on relative astrometry and extreme precision to
study the motion of very faint objects in the Universe. Theia is primarily
designed to study the local dark matter properties, the existence of Earth-like
exoplanets in our nearest star systems and the physics of compact objects.
Furthermore, about 15 $\%$ of the mission time was dedicated to an open
observatory for the wider community to propose complementary science cases.
With its unique metrology system and "point and stare" strategy, Theia's
precision would have reached the sub micro-arcsecond level. This is about 1000
times better than ESA/Gaia's accuracy for the brightest objects and represents
a factor 10-30 improvement for the faintest stars (depending on the exact
observational program). In the version submitted to ESA, we proposed an optical
(350-1000nm) on-axis TMA telescope. Due to ESA Technology readiness level, the
camera's focal plane would have been made of CCD detectors but we anticipated
an upgrade with CMOS detectors. Photometric measurements would have been
performed during slew time and stabilisation phases needed for reaching the
required astrometric precision.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.01581 [pdf] - 1582372
Pulsating star research and the Gaia revolution
Eyer, Laurent;
Clementini, Gisella;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Glass, Florian;
Audard, Marc;
Holl, Berry;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Cuypers, Jan;
De Ridder, Joris;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
de Fombelle, Gregory Jevardat;
Lanzafame, Alessandro;
Lecoeur-Taibi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Riello, Marco;
Ripepi, Vincenzo;
Sarro, Luis;
Süveges, Maria
Submitted: 2017-04-05
In this article we present an overview of the ESA Gaia mission and of the
unprecedented impact that Gaia will have on the field of variable star
research. We summarise the contents and impact of the first Gaia data release
on the description of variability phenomena, with particular emphasis on
pulsating star research. The Tycho-Gaia astrometric solution, although limited
to 2.1 million stars, has been used in many studies related to pulsating stars.
Furthermore a set of 3,194 Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars with their times series
have been released. Finally we present the plans for the ongoing study of
variable phenomena with Gaia and highlight some of the possible impacts of the
second data release on variable, and specifically, pulsating stars.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.10597 [pdf] - 1582256
Gaia eclipsing binary and multiple systems. Two-Gaussian models applied
to OGLE-III eclipsing binary light curves in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, I.;
Holl, B.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Barblan, F.;
Prsa, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Eyer, L.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Jevardat, G.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L.;
Audard, M.
Submitted: 2017-03-30
The advent of large scale multi-epoch surveys raises the need for automated
light curve (LC) processing. This is particularly true for eclipsing binaries
(EBs), which form one of the most populated types of variable objects. The Gaia
mission, launched at the end of 2013, is expected to detect of the order of few
million EBs over a 5-year mission.
We present an automated procedure to characterize EBs based on the geometric
morphology of their LCs with two aims: first to study an ensemble of EBs on a
statistical ground without the need to model the binary system, and second to
enable the automated identification of EBs that display atypical LCs. We model
the folded LC geometry of EBs using up to two Gaussian functions for the
eclipses and a cosine function for any ellipsoidal-like variability that may be
present between the eclipses. The procedure is applied to the OGLE-III data set
of EBs in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) as a proof of concept. The bayesian
information criterion is used to select the best model among models containing
various combinations of those components, as well as to estimate the
significance of the components.
Based on the two-Gaussian models, EBs with atypical LC geometries are
successfully identified in two diagrams, using the Abbe values of the original
and residual folded LCs, and the reduced $\chi^2$. Cleaning the data set from
the atypical cases and further filtering out LCs that contain non-significant
eclipse candidates, the ensemble of EBs can be studied on a statistical ground
using the two-Gaussian model parameters. For illustration purposes, we present
the distribution of projected eccentricities as a function of orbital period
for the OGLE-III set of EBs in the LMC, as well as the distribution of their
primary versus secondary eclipse widths.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.09362 [pdf] - 1582168
Gaia Eclipsing Binary and Multiple Systems. A study of detectability and
classification of eclipsing binaries with Gaia
Submitted: 2017-03-27
In the new era of large-scale astronomical surveys, automated methods of
analysis and classification of bulk data are a fundamental tool for fast and
efficient production of deliverables. This becomes ever more imminent as we
enter the Gaia era. We investigate the potential detectability of eclipsing
binaries with Gaia using a data set of all Kepler eclipsing binaries sampled
with Gaia cadence and folded with the Kepler period. The performance of fitting
methods is evaluated with comparison to real Kepler data parameters and a
classification scheme is proposed for the potentially detectable sources based
on the geometry of the light curve fits. The polynomial chain (polyfit) and
two-Gaussian models are used for light curve fitting of the data set.
Classification is performed with a combination of the t-SNE (t-distrubuted
Stochastic Neighbor Embedding) and DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of
Applications with Noise) algorithms. We find that approximately 68% of Kepler
Eclipsing Binary sources are potentially detectable by Gaia when folded with
the Kepler period and propose a classification scheme of the detectable sources
based on the morphological type indicative of the light curve, with subclasses
that reflect the properties of the fitted model (presence and visibility of
eclipses, their width, depth, etc.).
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.06296 [pdf] - 1581568
Gaia eclipsing binary and multiple systems. Supervised classification
and self-organizing maps
Submitted: 2017-02-21
Large surveys producing tera- and petabyte-scale databases require
machine-learning and knowledge discovery methods to deal with the overwhelming
quantity of data and the difficulties of extracting concise, meaningful
information with reliable assessment of its uncertainty. This study
investigates the potential of a few machine-learning methods for the automated
analysis of eclipsing binaries in the data of such surveys. We aim to aid the
extraction of samples of eclipsing binaries from such databases and to provide
basic information about the objects. We estimate class labels according to two
classification systems, one based on the light curve morphology (EA/EB/EW
classes) and the other based on the physical characteristics of the binary
system (system morphology classes; detached through overcontact systems).
Furthermore, we explore low-dimensional surfaces along which the light curves
of eclipsing binaries are concentrated, to use in the characterization of the
binary systems and in the exploration of biases of the full unknown Gaia data
with respect to the training sets. We explore the performance of principal
component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest
classification and self-organizing maps (SOM). We pre-process the photometric
time series by combining a double Gaussian profile fit and a smoothing spline,
in order to de-noise and interpolate the observed light curves. We achieve
further denoising, and selected the most important variability elements from
the light curves using PCA. We perform supervised classification using random
forest and LDA based on the PC decomposition, while SOM gives a continuous
2-dimensional manifold of the light curves arranged by a few important
features. We estimate the uncertainty of the supervised methods due to the
specific finite training set using ensembles of models constructed on
randomized training sets.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04165 [pdf] - 1535795
Crossmatching variable objects with the Gaia data
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Süveges, Maria;
Charnas, Jonathan;
Guy, Leanne P.;
de Fombelle, Grégory Jevardat;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Ordóñez-Blanco, Diego;
Eyer, Laurent
Submitted: 2017-02-14
Tens of millions of new variable objects are expected to be identified in
over a billion time series from the Gaia mission. Crossmatching known variable
sources with those from Gaia is crucial to incorporate current knowledge,
understand how these objects appear in the Gaia data, train supervised
classifiers to recognise known classes, and validate the results of the
Variability Processing and Analysis Coordination Unit (CU7) within the Gaia
Data Analysis and Processing Consortium (DPAC). The method employed by CU7 to
crossmatch variables for the first Gaia data release includes a binary
classifier to take into account positional uncertainties, proper motion,
targeted variability signals, and artefacts present in the early calibration of
the Gaia data. Crossmatching with a classifier makes it possible to automate
all those decisions which are typically made during visual inspection. The
classifier can be trained with objects characterized by a variety of attributes
to ensure similarity in multiple dimensions (astrometry, photometry,
time-series features), with no need for a-priori transformations to compare
different photometric bands, or of predictive models of the motion of objects
to compare positions. Other advantages as well as some disadvantages of the
method are discussed. Implementation steps from the training to the assessment
of the crossmatch classifier and selection of results are described.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.03295 [pdf] - 1535694
Gaia Data Release 1: The variability processing & analysis and its
application to the south ecliptic pole region
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Evans, D. W.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordonez, D.;
Holl, B.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Riello, M.;
Clementini, G.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Ridder, J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Charnas, J.;
Guy, L. P.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Rimoldini, L.;
Süveges, M.;
Mignard, F.;
Busso, G.;
De Angeli, F.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Dubath, P.;
Beck, M.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Debosscher, J.;
Distefano, E.;
Fuchs, J.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Lopez, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Ripepi, V.;
Roelens, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Tingley, B.;
Votruba, V.;
Zucker, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Barblan, F.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Grenon, M.;
Jan, A.;
Lorenz, D.;
Miranda, B.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Ordenovic, C.;
Palaversa, L.;
Prsa, A.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Hudec, R.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Kutka, A.;
Moniez, M.;
Nicoletti, J. -M.;
Park, P.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Varadi, M.;
Kochoska, A.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Marconi, M.;
Marschalko, G.;
Messina, S.;
Musella, I.;
Pagano, I.;
Sadowski, G.;
Schultheis, M.
Submitted: 2017-02-10
The ESA Gaia mission provides a unique time-domain survey for more than one
billion sources brighter than G=20.7 mag. Gaia offers the unprecedented
opportunity to study variability phenomena in the Universe thanks to
multi-epoch G-magnitude photometry in addition to astrometry, blue and red
spectro-photometry, and spectroscopy. Within the Gaia Consortium, Coordination
Unit 7 has the responsibility to detect variable objects, classify them, derive
characteristic parameters for specific variability classes, and provide global
descriptions of variable phenomena.
We describe the variability processing and analysis that we plan to apply to
the successive data releases, and we present its application to the G-band
photometry results of the first 14 months of Gaia operations that comprises 28
days of Ecliptic Pole Scanning Law and 13 months of Nominal Scanning Law.
Out of the 694 million, all-sky, sources that have calibrated G-band
photometry in this first stage of the mission, about 2.3 million sources that
have at least 20 observations are located within 38 degrees from the South
Ecliptic Pole. We detect about 14% of them as variable candidates, among which
the automated classification identified 9347 Cepheid and RR Lyrae candidates.
Additional visual inspections and selection criteria led to the publication of
3194 Cepheid and RR Lyrae stars, described in Clementini et al. (2016). Under
the restrictive conditions for DR1, the completenesses of Cepheids and RR Lyrae
stars are estimated at 67% and 58%, respectively, numbers that will
significantly increase with subsequent Gaia data releases.
Data processing within the Gaia Consortium is iterative, the quality of the
data and the results being improved at each iteration. The results presented in
this article show a glimpse of the exceptional harvest that is to be expected
from the Gaia mission for variability phenomena. [abridged]
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02952 [pdf] - 1538988
Gaia data release 1, the photometric data
van Leeuwen, F.;
Evans, D. W.;
De Angeli, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Busso, G.;
Cacciari, C.;
Riello, M.;
Pancino, E.;
Altavilla, G.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Burgess, P.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Davidson, M.;
De Luise, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Galleti, S.;
Gilmore, G.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Holland, G.;
MacDonald, I.;
Marinoni, S.;
Montegrffo, P.;
Osborne, P.;
Ragaini, S.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rowell, N.;
Voss, H.;
Walton, N. A.;
Weiler, M.;
Castellani, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Høg, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Millar, N. R.;
Pagani, C.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pulone, L.;
Rixon, G.;
Suess, F. F.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Alecu, A.;
Allan, P. M.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Belokurov, V.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Brown, S.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Burgon, R.;
Campbell, H.;
Collins, R. S.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Ducourant, C.;
van Elteren, A.;
Evans, N. W.;
Federici, L.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraser, M.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, A. D.;
Iannicola, G.;
Irwin, M.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Masana, E.;
Munari, U.;
Ortiz, P.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Peltzer, C.;
Portell, J.;
Read, A.;
Terrett, D.;
Torra, J.;
Trager, S. C.;
Troisi, L.;
Valentini, G.;
Vallenari, A.;
Wevers, T.
Submitted: 2016-12-09
Context. This paper presents an overview of the photometric data that are
part of the first Gaia data release. Aims. The principles of the processing and
the main characteristics of the Gaia photometric data are presented. Methods.
The calibration strategy is outlined briefly and the main properties of the
resulting photometry are presented. Results. Relations with other broadband
photometric systems are provided. The overall precision for the Gaia photometry
is shown to be at the milli-magnitude level and has a clear potential to
improve further in future releases.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04269 [pdf] - 1523839
Gaia Data Release 1 - The Cepheid & RR Lyrae star pipeline and its
application to the south ecliptic pole region
Clementini, G.;
Ripepi, V.;
Leccia, S.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Marconi, M.;
Szabados, L.;
Eyer, L.;
Guy, L. P.;
Rimoldini, L.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Holl, B.;
Busso, G.;
Charnas, J.;
Cuypers, J.;
De Angeli, F.;
De Ridder, J.;
Debosscher, J.;
Evans, D. W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Musella, I.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordonez, D.;
Regibo, S.;
Riello, M.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Suveges, M.
Submitted: 2016-09-14, last modified: 2016-10-14
We present an overview of the Specific Objects Study (SOS) pipeline developed
within the Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) of the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis
Consortium (DPAC), the coordination unit charged with the processing and
analysis of variable sources observed by Gaia, to validate and fully
characterise Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars observed by the spacecraft. We
describe how the SOS for Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars (SOS Cep&RRL) was
specifically tailored to analyse Gaia's G-band photometric time-series with a
South Ecliptic Pole (SEP) footprint, which covers an external region of the
Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). G-band time-series photometry and
characterization by the SOS Cep&RRL pipeline (mean magnitude and pulsation
characteristics) are published in Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) for a total
sample of 3,194 variable stars, 599 Cepheids and 2,595 RR Lyrae stars, of which
386 (43 Cepheids and 343 RR Lyrae stars) are new discoveries by Gaia. All 3,194
stars are distributed over an area extending 38 degrees on either side from a
point offset from the centre of the LMC by about 3 degrees to the north and 4
degrees to the east. The vast majority, but not all, are located within the
LMC. The published sample also includes a few bright RR Lyrae stars that trace
the outer halo of the Milky Way in front of the LMC.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07255 [pdf] - 1523853
Gaia Data Release 1: The reference frame and the optical properties of
ICRF sources
Mignard, F.;
Klioner, S.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Bombrun, A.;
Hernandez, J.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Biermann, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmueller, H.;
Andrei, A.;
Bourda, G.;
Charlot, P.
Submitted: 2016-09-23
As part of the data processing for Gaia Data Release~1 (Gaia DR1) a special
astrometric solution was computed, the so-called auxiliary quasar solution.
This gives positions for selected extragalactic objects, including radio
sources in the second realisation of the International Celestial Reference
Frame (ICRF2) that have optical counterparts bright enough to be observed with
Gaia. A subset of these positions was used to align the positional reference
frame of Gaia DR1 with the ICRF2. We describe the properties of the Gaia
auxiliary quasar solution for a subset of sources matched to ICRF2, and compare
their optical and radio positions at the sub-mas level. Their formal standard
errors are better than 0.76~milliarcsec (mas) for 50% of the sources and better
than 3.35~mas for 90%. Optical magnitudes are obtained in Gaia's unfiltered
photometric G band. The comparison with the radio positions of the defining
sources shows no systematic differences larger than a few tenths of a mas. The
fraction of questionable solutions, not readily accounted for by the
statistics, is less than 6%. Normalised differences have extended tails
requiring case-by-case investigations for around 100 sources, but we have not
seen any difference indisputably linked to an optical-radio offset in the
sources.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.00556 [pdf] - 1498385
Vetting Galactic Leavitt Law Calibrators using Radial Velocities: On the
Variability, Binarity, and Possible Parallax Error of 19 Long-period Cepheids
Anderson, R. I.;
Casertano, S.;
Riess, A. G.;
Melis, C.;
Holl, B.;
Semaan, T.;
Papics, P. I.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Eyer, L.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Palaversa, L.;
Roelens, M.
Submitted: 2016-08-01
We investigate the radial velocity (RV) variability and spectroscopic
binarity of 19 Galactic long-period ($P_{\rm{puls}} \gtrsim 10$ d) classical
Cepheid variable stars whose trigonometric parallaxes are being measured using
the Hubble Space Telescope and Gaia. Our primary objective is to constrain
possible parallax error due to undetected orbital motion. Using $>1600$
high-precision RVs measured between 2011 and 2016, we find no indication of
orbital motion on $\lesssim 5$ yr timescales for 18 Cepheids and determine
upper limits on allowed configurations for a range of input orbital periods.
The results constrain the unsigned parallax error due to orbital motion to $< 2
\%$ for 16 stars, and $< 4 \%$ for 18. We improve the orbital solution of the
known binary YZ Carinae and show that the astrometric model must take into
account orbital motion to avoid significant error ($\sim \pm 100 \mu$arcsec).
We further investigate long-timescale ($P_{\rm{orb}} > 10$ yr) variations in
pulsation-averaged velocity $v_\gamma$ via a template fitting approach using
both new and literature RVs. We discover the spectroscopic binarity of XZ Car
and CD Cyg, find first tentative evidence for AQ Car, and reveal KN Cen's
orbital signature. Further (mostly tentative) evidence of time-variable
$v_\gamma$ is found for SS CMa, VY Car, SZ Cyg, and X Pup. We briefly discuss
considerations regarding a vetting process of Galactic Leavitt law calibrators
and show that light contributions by companions are insignificant for most
distance scale applications.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.08614 [pdf] - 1378770
Revealing the Nature of Extreme Coronal-line Emitter SDSS
J095209.56+214313.3
Submitted: 2015-12-29
Extreme coronal-line emitter (ECLE) SDSSJ095209.56+214313.3, known by its
strong, fading, high ionization lines, has been a long standing candidate for a
tidal disruption event, however a supernova origin has not yet been ruled out.
Here we add several new pieces of information to the puzzle of the nature of
the transient that powered its variable coronal lines: 1) an optical light
curve from the Lincoln Near Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) survey that
serendipitously catches the optical flare, and 2) late-time observations of the
host galaxy with the Swift Ultraviolet and Optical Telescope (UVOT) and X-ray
telescope (XRT) and the ground-based Mercator telescope. The well-sampled,
$\sim10$-year long, unfiltered LINEAR light curve constrains the onset of the
flare to a precision of $\pm5$ days and enables us to place a lower limit on
the peak optical magnitude. Difference imaging allows us to estimate the
location of the flare in proximity of the host galaxy core. Comparison of the
\textsl{GALEX} data (early 2006) with the recently acquired Swift UVOT (June
2015) and Mercator observations (April 2015) demonstrate a decrease in the UV
flux over a $\sim 10$ year period, confirming that the flare was UV-bright. The
long-lived UV-bright emission, detected 1.8 rest-frame years after the start of
the flare, strongly disfavors a SN origin. These new data allow us to conclude
that the flare was indeed powered by the tidal disruption of a star by a
supermassive black hole and that TDEs are in fact capable of powering the
enigmatic class of ECLEs.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.00782 [pdf] - 1232162
A comparative study of four significance measures for periodicity
detection in astronomical surveys
Süveges, Maria;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Eyer, Laurent;
Cuypers, Jan;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Blanco, Diego Ordóñez;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Ruiz, Idoia
Submitted: 2015-04-03
We study the problem of periodicity detection in massive data sets of
photometric or radial velocity time series, as presented by ESA's Gaia mission.
Periodicity detection hinges on the estimation of the false alarm probability
(FAP) of the extremum of the periodogram of the time series. We consider the
problem of its estimation with two main issues in mind. First, for a given
number of observations and signal-to-noise ratio, the rate of correct
periodicity detections should be constant for all realized cadences of
observations regardless of the observational time patterns, in order to avoid
sky biases that are difficult to assess. Second, the computational loads should
be kept feasible even for millions of time series. Using the Gaia case, we
compare the $F^M$ method (Paltani 2004, Schwarzenberg-Czerny 2012), the Baluev
method (Baluev 2008) and the GEV method (S\"uveges 2014), as well as a method
for the direct estimation of a threshold. Three methods involve some unknown
parameters, which are obtained by fitting a regression-type predictive model
using easily obtainable covariates derived from observational time series. We
conclude that the GEV and the Baluev methods both provide good solutions to the
issues posed by a large-scale processing. The first of these yields the best
scientific quality at the price of some moderately costly pre-processing. When
this pre-processing is impossible for some reason (e.g. the computational costs
are prohibitive or good regression models cannot be constructed), the Baluev
method provides a computationally inexpensive alternative with slight biases in
regions where time samplings exhibit strong aliases.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.04116 [pdf] - 1055849
Revealing {\delta} Cephei's Secret Companion and Intriguing Past
Submitted: 2015-03-13
Classical Cepheid variable stars are crucial calibrators of the cosmic
distance scale thanks to a relation between their pulsation periods and
luminosities. Their archetype, {\delta} Cephei, is an important calibrator for
this relation. In this paper, we show that {\delta} Cephei is a spectroscopic
binary based on newly-obtained high-precision radial velocities. We combine
these new data with literature data to determine the orbit, which has period
2201 days, semi-amplitude 1.5 km/s, and high eccentricity (e = 0.647). We
re-analyze Hipparcos intermediate astrometric data to measure {\delta} Cephei's
parallax ($\varpi = 4.09 \pm 0.16$ mas) and find tentative evidence for an
orbital signature, although we cannot claim detection. We estimate that Gaia
will fully determine the astrometric orbit. Using the available information
from spectroscopy, velocimetry, astrometry, and Geneva stellar evolution models
($M_{\delta Cep} ~ 5.0 - 5.25 M_\odot$), we constrain the companion mass to
within $0.2 < M_2 < 1.2 M_\odot$. We discuss the potential of ongoing and
previous interactions between the companion and {\delta} Cephei near pericenter
passage, informing reported observations of circumstellar material and
bow-shock. The orbit may have undergone significant changes due to a
Kozai-Lidov mechanism driven by the outer (visual and astrometric) companion HD
213307. Our discovery of {\delta} Cephei's nature as a spectroscopic binary
exposes a hidden companion and reveals a rich and dynamical history of the
archetype of classical Cepheid variables.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.03830 [pdf] - 935393
The variability processing and analysis of the Gaia mission
Eyer, Laurent;
Evans, Dafydd Wyn;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Lanzafame, Alessandro;
Cuypers, Jan;
De Ridder, Joris;
Sarro, Luis;
Clementini, Gisella;
Guy, Leanne;
Holl, Berry;
Ordonez, Diego;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Lecoeur-Taibi, Isabelle
Submitted: 2015-02-12
We present the variability processing and analysis that is foreseen for the
Gaia mission within Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) of the Gaia Data Processing and
Analysis Consortium (DPAC). A top level description of the tasks is given.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.03829 [pdf] - 935392
The Gaia Mission, Binary Stars and Exoplanets
Eyer, Laurent;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Holl, Berry;
North, Pierre;
Zucker, Shay;
Evans, Dafydd W.;
Pourbaix, Dimitri;
Hodgkin, Simon T.;
Thuillot, William;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Carry, Benoit
Submitted: 2015-02-12
On the 19th of December 2013, the Gaia spacecraft was successfully launched
by a Soyuz rocket from French Guiana and started its amazing journey to map and
characterise one billion celestial objects with its one billion pixel camera.
In this presentation, we briefly review the general aims of the mission and
describe what has happened since launch, including the Ecliptic Pole scanning
mode. We also focus especially on binary stars, starting with some basic
observational aspects, and then turning to the remarkable harvest that Gaia is
expected to yield for these objects.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01165 [pdf] - 931035
Automated eclipsing binary detection: applying the Gaia CU7 pipeline to
Hipparcos
Holl, Berry;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Barblan, Fabio;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Eyer, Laurent;
Süveges, Maria;
Guy, Leanne;
Ordoñez-Blanco, Diego;
Ruiz, Idoia;
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof
Submitted: 2015-02-04
We demonstrate the eclipsing binary detection performance of the Gaia
variability analysis and processing pipeline using Hipparcos data. The
automated pipeline classifies 1,067 (0.9%) of the 118,204 Hipparcos sources as
eclipsing binary candidates. The detection rate amounts to 89% (732 sources) in
a subset of 819 visually confirmed eclipsing binaries, with the period
correctly identified for 80% of them, and double or half periods obtained in 6%
of the cases.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.5943 [pdf] - 904189
Time series data mining for the Gaia variability analysis
Nienartowicz, Krzysztof;
Blanco, Diego Ordóñez;
Guy, Leanne;
Holl, Berry;
Lecoeur-Taïbi, Isabelle;
Mowlavi, Nami;
Rimoldini, Lorenzo;
Ruiz, Idoia;
Süveges, Maria;
Eyer, Laurent
Submitted: 2014-11-21
Gaia is an ESA cornerstone mission, which was successfully launched December
2013 and commenced operations in July 2014. Within the Gaia Data Processing and
Analysis consortium, Coordination Unit 7 (CU7) is responsible for the
variability analysis of over a billion celestial sources and nearly 4 billion
associated time series (photometric, spectrophotometric, and spectroscopic),
encoding information in over 800 billion observations during the 5 years of the
mission, resulting in a petabyte scale analytical problem. In this article, we
briefly describe the solutions we developed to address the challenges of time
series variability analysis: from the structure for a distributed data-oriented
scientific collaboration to architectural choices and specific components used.
Our approach is based on Open Source components with a distributed, partitioned
database as the core to handle incrementally: ingestion, distributed
processing, analysis, results and export in a constrained time window.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.0303 [pdf] - 633740
The Gaia mission
Submitted: 2013-03-01
Gaia is a very ambitious mission of the European Space Agency. At the heart
of Gaia lie the measurements of the positions, distances, space motions,
brightnesses and astrophysical parameters of stars, which represent fundamental
pillars of modern astronomical knowledge. We provide a brief description of the
Gaia mission with an emphasis on binary stars. In particular, we summarize
results of simulations, which estimate the number of binary stars to be
processed to several tens of millions. We also report on the catalogue release
scenarios. In the current proposal, the first results for binary stars will be
available in 2017 (for a launch in 2013).
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:1112.4165 [pdf] - 453259
A conjugate gradient algorithm for the astrometric core solution of Gaia
Submitted: 2011-12-18
The ESA space astrometry mission Gaia, planned to be launched in 2013, has
been designed to make angular measurements on a global scale with
micro-arcsecond accuracy. A key component of the data processing for Gaia is
the astrometric core solution, which must implement an efficient and accurate
numerical algorithm to solve the resulting, extremely large least-squares
problem. The Astrometric Global Iterative Solution (AGIS) is a framework that
allows to implement a range of different iterative solution schemes suitable
for a scanning astrometric satellite. In order to find a computationally
efficient and numerically accurate iteration scheme for the astrometric
solution, compatible with the AGIS framework, we study an adaptation of the
classical conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm, and compare it to the so-called
simple iteration (SI) scheme that was previously known to converge for this
problem, although very slowly. The different schemes are implemented within a
software test bed for AGIS known as AGISLab, which allows to define, simulate
and study scaled astrometric core solutions. After successful testing in
AGISLab, the CG scheme has been implemented also in AGIS. The two algorithms CG
and SI eventually converge to identical solutions, to within the numerical
noise (of the order of 0.00001 micro-arcsec). These solutions are independent
of the starting values (initial star catalogue), and we conclude that they are
equivalent to a rigorous least-squares estimation of the astrometric
parameters. The CG scheme converges up to a factor four faster than SI in the
tested cases, and in particular spatially correlated truncation errors are much
more efficiently damped out with the CG scheme.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.1547 [pdf] - 1084711
The impact of CCD radiation damage on Gaia astrometry: I. Image location
estimation in the presence of radiation damage
Submitted: 2011-10-07
The Gaia mission has been designed to perform absolute astrometric
measurements with unprecedented accuracy; the end-of-mission parallax standard
error is required to be 30 micro-arcseconds for a G2V type star of magnitude
15. These requirements set a stringent constraint on the accuracy of the
estimation of the location of the stellar image on the CCD for each
observation: e.g., 0.3 milli-arseconds (mas) or 0.005 pixels for the same V=15
G2V star. However the Gaia CCDs will suffer from charge transfer inefficiency
(CTI) caused by radiation damage that will degrade the stellar image quality
and may degrade the astrometric performance of Gaia if not properly addressed.
For the first time at this level of detail, the potential impact of radiation
damage on the performance of Gaia is investigated. In this first paper we focus
on the evaluation of the CTI impact on the image location accuracy. We show
that CTI decreases the stellar image signal-to-noise ratio and irreversibly
degrades the image location estimation precision. As a consequence the location
estimation standard errors increase by up to 6% for a radiation damage level
equivalent to the end-of-mission. In addition the CTI-induced image distortion
introduces a systematic bias in the image location estimation (up to 0.05
pixels or 3 mas in the Gaia operating conditions). We present a novel approach
to CTI mitigation that enables, without correction of the raw data, the
unbiased estimation of the image location and flux from damaged observations.
Its implementation reduces the maximum measured location bias for the faintest
magnitude to 0.005 pixels (~4e-4 pixels at magnitude 15). In a second paper we
will investigate how the CTI effects affect the final astrometric accuracy of
Gaia by propagating residual errors through the astrometric solution.