Normalized to: Hofstadter, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.13869 [pdf] - 2121592
Deep Atmosphere Composition, Structure, Origin, and Exploration, with
Particular Focus on Critical in situ Science at the Icy Giants
Submitted: 2020-06-24
A comprehensive exploration of Uranus and Neptune is essential to understand
the formation and evolution of the giant planets, in particular, solar system,
in general, and, by extension, a vast population of exoplanets. Though core
accretion is generally favored over gravitational instability as the model of
the formation of the gas giants, Jupiter and Saturn, observational constraints
are presently lacking to make a compelling case for either in the case of the
icy giants. Abundances of the heavy elements with mass exceeding that of helium
provide the best constraints to the formation and migration models. For Uranus
and Neptune, only the C elemental abundance has been determined from methane
measurements, but should be considered as a lower limit considering methane is
a condensible gas in the icy giants. Well-mixed water, ammonia and hydrogen
sulfide to determine O, N and S elemental abundances, respectively, are too
deep to measure by any observation technique. However, a precise measurement of
the noble gases, He, Ne, Ar, Kr and Xe, together with their isotopic ratios,
would circumvent the need for determining the above elements. Only entry probes
are capable of measuring the noble gases, but those measurements can be done at
relatively shallow pressure levels of 5-10 bars. Complementary observations
from orbiter, especially the interior (gravity and magnetic field) and depth
profiles of water and ammonia, would greatly enhance the data set for
constraining the formation models. No new technology is required to carry out
an orbiter-probe mission to either Uranus or Neptune in the next decade.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.11182 [pdf] - 2089174
Exploration Strategy for the Outer Planets 2023-2032: Goals and
Priorities
Moore, Jeff;
Spilker, Linda;
Cable, Morgan;
Edgington, Scott;
Hendrix, Amanda;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Hurford, Terry;
Mandt, Kathleen;
McEwen, Alfred;
Paty, Carol;
Quick, Lynnae;
Rymer, Abigail;
Sayanagi, Kunio;
Schmidt, Britney;
Spilker, Thomas
Submitted: 2020-03-24, last modified: 2020-05-05
The outer solar system is home to a diverse range of objects, holding
important clues about the formation and evolution of our solar system, the
emergence and current distribution of life, and the physical processes
controlling both our own and exoplanetary systems.
This White Paper summarizes the Outer Planets Analysis Group's (OPAG's)
priorities as they relate to the Decadal Survey. Taking into account the
science to be achieved, the timing of solar system events, technological
readiness, and programmatic factors, our mission recommendations are as
follows. OPAG strongly endorses the completion and launch of the Europa Clipper
mission, maintaining the science capabilities identified upon its selection,
and a Juno extended mission at Jupiter. For the decade 2023-2032, OPAG endorses
a new start for two directed missions: first, a mission to Neptune or Uranus
(the ice giants) with atmospheric probe(s), and second, a life detection Ocean
World mission, along with additional technological development for life
detection. A Neptune mission is preferred because, while the Neptune and Uranus
systems provide equally compelling opportunities to address the Origins and
Processes Questions, Triton is a higher priority ocean world target than the
Uranian satellites. The mission to Neptune or Uranus should fly first because a
delay threatens key science objectives, and additional technological
development is required for a directed life detection mission.
Along with missions, we emphasize the necessity of maintaining a healthy
Research and Analysis (R&A) program as well as a robust Earth-based observing
program. OPAG's top two technology priorities are rapid development of a
next-generation radioisotope power source for a mission to Neptune or Uranus,
and development of key life detection technologies in support of an Ocean World
mission.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.02901 [pdf] - 2061542
Ice Giant Circulation Patterns: Implications for Atmospheric Probes
Submitted: 2019-07-05, last modified: 2020-02-17
Atmospheric circulation patterns derived from multi-spectral remote sensing
can serve as a guide for choosing a suitable entry site for a future in situ
probe mission. Since the Voyager-2 flybys in the 1980s, three decades of
observations from ground- and space-based observatories have generated a
picture of Ice Giant circulation that is complex, perplexing, and altogether
unlike that seen on the Gas Giants. This review seeks to reconcile the various
competing circulation patterns from an observational perspective, accounting
for spatially-resolved measurements of: zonal albedo contrasts and banded
appearances; cloud-tracked zonal winds; temperature and para-H$_2$ measurements
above the condensate clouds; and equator-to-pole contrasts in condensable
volatiles (methane and hydrogen sulphide) in the deeper troposphere. These
observations identify three distinct latitude domains: an equatorial domain of
deep upwelling and upper-tropospheric subsidence, potentially bounded by peaks
in the retrograde zonal jet and analogous to Jovian cyclonic belts; a
mid-latitude transitional domain of upper-tropospheric upwelling, vigorous
cloud activity, analogous to Jovian anticyclonic zones; and a polar domain of
strong subsidence, volatile depletion, and small-scale (and potentially
seasonally-variable) convective activity. Taken together, the multi-wavelength
observations suggest a tiered structure of stacked circulation cells (at least
two in the troposphere and one in the stratosphere), potentially separated in
the vertical by (i) strong molecular weight gradients associated with cloud
condensation, and by (ii) transitions from a thermally-direct circulation
regime at depth to a wave-driven circulation regime at high altitude. The
inferred circulation can be tested in the coming decade by 3D simulations and
by observations from future world-class facilities. [Abridged]
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.08769 [pdf] - 1951386
Outer Solar System Exploration: A Compelling and Unified Dual Mission
Decadal Strategy for Exploring Uranus, Neptune, Triton, Dwarf Planets, and
Small KBOs and Centaurs
Submitted: 2018-07-23, last modified: 2019-08-30
Laying the Vision and Voyages (V&V, National Research Council 2011) Decadal
Survey 2013-2022 objectives against subsequent budget profiles reveals that
separate missions to every desirable target in the Solar System are simply not
realistic. In fact, very few of these missions will be achievable under current
budget realities. Given the cost and difficulty in reaching the outer Solar
System, competition between high-value science missions to an Ice Giant system
and the Kuiper Belt is counterproductive. A superior approach is to combine the
two programs into an integrated strategy that maximizes the science that can be
achieved across many science disciplines and communities, while recognizing
pragmatic budget limitations.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.00917 [pdf] - 1927551
In situ Exploration of the Giant Planets
Mousis, Olivier;
Atkinson, David H.;
Ambrosi, Richard;
Atreya, Sushil;
Banfield, Don;
Barabash, Stas;
Blanc, Michel;
Cavalié, Thibault;
Coustenis, Athena;
Deleuil, Magali;
Durry, Georges;
Ferri, Francesca;
Fletcher, Leigh;
Fouchet, Thierry;
Guillot, Tristan;
Hartogh, Paul;
Hueso, Ricardo;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Lebreton, Jean-Pierre;
Mandt, Kathleen E.;
Rauer, Heike;
Rannou, Pascal;
Renard, Jean-Baptiste;
Sanchez-Lávega, Agustin;
Sayanagi, Kunio;
Simon, Amy;
Spilker, Thomas;
Venkatapathy, Ethiraj;
Waite, J. Hunter;
Wurz, Peter
Submitted: 2019-07-31
Remote sensing observations suffer significant limitations when used to study
the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. This
impacts our knowledge of the formation of these planets and the physics of
their atmospheres. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe
measurements was illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key
measurements such as the determination of the noble gases' abundances and the
precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio were only made available through
in situ measurements by the Galileo probe. Here we describe the main scientific
goals to be addressed by the future in situ exploration of Saturn, Uranus, and
Neptune, placing the Galileo probe exploration of Jupiter in a broader context.
An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level would yield insight into
two broad themes: i) the formation history of the giant planets and that of the
Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe
would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics,
with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay
station. An atmospheric probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to
a future NASA New Frontiers or flagship mission to be launched toward Saturn,
Uranus, and/or Neptune.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03573 [pdf] - 1663501
Solar System Ice Giants: Exoplanets in our Backyard
Rymer, Abigail;
Mandt, Kathleen;
Hurley, Dana;
Lisse, Carey;
Izenberg, Noam;
Smith, H. Todd;
Westlake, Joseph;
Bunce, Emma;
Arridge, Christopher;
Masters, Adam;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Simon, Amy;
Brandt, Pontus;
Clark, George;
Cohen, Ian;
Allen, Robert;
Vine, Sarah;
Hansen, Kenneth;
Hospodarsky, George;
Kurth, William;
Romani, Paul;
Lamy, Laurent;
Zarka, Philippe;
Cao, Hao;
Paty, Carol;
Hedman, Matthew;
Roussos, Elias;
Cruikshank, Dale;
Farrell, William;
Fieseler, Paul;
Coates, Andrew;
Yelle, Roger;
Parkinson, Christopher;
Militzer, Burkhard;
Grodent, Denis;
Kollmann, Peter;
McNutt, Ralph;
André, Nicolas;
Strange, Nathan;
Barnes, Jason;
Dones, Luke;
Denk, Tilmann;
Rathbun, Julie;
Lunine, Jonathan;
Desai, Ravi;
Cochrane, Corey;
Sayanagi, Kunio M.;
Postberg, Frank;
Ebert, Robert;
Hill, Thomas;
Mueller-Wodarg, Ingo;
Regoli, Leonardo;
Pontius, Duane;
Stanley, Sabine;
Greathouse, Thomas;
Saur, Joachim;
Marouf, Essam;
Bergman, Jan;
Higgins, Chuck;
Johnson, Robert;
Thomsen, Michelle;
Soderlund, Krista;
Jia, Xianzhe;
Wilson, Robert;
Englander, Jacob;
Burch, Jim;
Nordheim, Tom;
Grava, Cesare;
Baines, Kevin;
Quick, Lynnae;
Russell, Christopher;
Cravens, Thomas;
Cecconi, Baptiste;
Aslam, Shahid;
Bray, Veronica;
Garcia-Sage, Katherine;
Richardson, John;
Clark, John;
Hsu, Sean;
Achterberg, Richard;
Sergis, Nick;
Paganelli, Flora;
Kempf, Sasha;
Orton, Glenn;
Portyankina, Ganna;
Jones, Geraint;
Economou, Thanasis;
Livengood, Timothy;
Krimigi, Stamatios;
Szalay, James;
Jackman, Catriona;
Valek, Phillip;
Lecacheux, Alain;
Colwell, Joshua;
Jasinski, Jamie;
Tosi, Federico;
Sulaiman, Ali;
Galand, Marina;
Kotova, Anna;
Khurana, Krishan;
Kivelson, Margaret;
Strobel, Darrell;
Radiota, Aikaterina;
Estrada, Paul;
Livi, Stefano;
Azari, Abigail;
Yates, Japheth;
Allegrini, Frederic;
Vogt, Marissa;
Felici, Marianna;
Luhmann, Janet;
Filacchione, Gianrico;
Moore, Luke
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Future remote sensing of exoplanets will be enhanced by a thorough
investigation of our solar system Ice Giants (Neptune-size planets). What can
the configuration of the magnetic field tell us (remotely) about the interior,
and what implications does that field have for the structure of the
magnetosphere; energy input into the atmosphere, and surface geophysics (for
example surface weathering of satellites that might harbour sub-surface
oceans). How can monitoring of auroral emission help inform future remote
observations of emission from exoplanets? Our Solar System provides the only
laboratory in which we can perform in-situ experiments to understand exoplanet
formation, dynamos, systems and magnetospheres.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.00235 [pdf] - 1693913
Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations
Mousis, O.;
Atkinson, D. H.;
Cavalié, T.;
Fletcher, L. N.;
Amato, M. J.;
Aslam, S.;
Ferri, F.;
Renard, J. -B.;
Spilker, T.;
Venkatapathy, E.;
Wurz, P.;
Aplin, K.;
Coustenis, A.;
Deleuil, M.;
Dobrijevic, M.;
Fouchet, T.;
Guillot, T.;
Hartogh, P.;
Hewagama, T.;
Hofstadter, M. D.;
Hue, V.;
Hueso, R.;
Lebreton, J. -P.;
Lellouch, E.;
Moses, J.;
Orton, G. S.;
Pearl, J. C.;
Sanchez-Lavega, A.;
Simon, A.;
Venot, O.;
Waite, J. H.;
Achterberg, R. K.;
Atreya, S.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blanc, M.;
Borget, F.;
Brugger, B.;
Charnoz, S.;
Chiavassa, T.;
Cottini, V.;
d'Hendecourt, L.;
Danger, G.;
Encrenaz, T.;
Gorius, N. J. P.;
Jorda, L.;
Marty, B.;
Moreno, R.;
Morse, A.;
Nixon, C.;
Reh, K.;
Ronnet, T.;
Schmider, F. -X.;
Sheridan, S.;
Sotin, C.;
Vernazza, P.;
Villanueva, G. L.
Submitted: 2017-08-01
The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the least understood class of planets
in our solar system but the most frequently observed type of exoplanets.
Presumed to have a small rocky core, a deep interior comprising ~70% heavy
elements surrounded by a more dilute outer envelope of H2 and He, Uranus and
Neptune are fundamentally different from the better-explored gas giants Jupiter
and Saturn. Because of the lack of dedicated exploration missions, our
knowledge of the composition and atmospheric processes of these distant worlds
is primarily derived from remote sensing from Earth-based observatories and
space telescopes. As a result, Uranus's and Neptune's physical and atmospheric
properties remain poorly constrained and their roles in the evolution of the
Solar System not well understood. Exploration of an ice giant system is
therefore a high-priority science objective as these systems (including the
magnetosphere, satellites, rings, atmosphere, and interior) challenge our
understanding of planetary formation and evolution. Here we describe the main
scientific goals to be addressed by a future in situ exploration of an ice
giant. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level, about 5 scale
heights beneath the tropopause, would yield insight into two broad themes: i)
the formation history of the ice giants and, in a broader extent, that of the
Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe
would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics,
with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay
station. In addition, possible mission concepts and partnerships are presented,
and a strawman ice-giant probe payload is described. An ice-giant atmospheric
probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to a future NASA ice-giant
flagship mission.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.06444 [pdf] - 1298221
Next Generation Very Large Array Memo No. 6, Science Working Group 1:
The Cradle of Life
Isella, Andrea;
Hull, Charles L. H.;
Moullet, Arielle;
Galván-Madrid, Roberto;
Johnstone, Doug;
Ricci, Luca;
Tobin, John;
Testi, Leonardo;
Beltran, Maite;
Lazio, Joseph;
Siemion, Andrew;
Liu, Hauyu Baobab;
Du, Fujun;
Öberg, Karin I.;
Bergin, Ted;
Caselli, Paola;
Bourke, Tyler;
Carilli, Chris;
Perez, Laura;
Butler, Bryan;
de Pater, Imke;
Qi, Chunhua;
Hofstadter, Mark;
Moreno, Raphael;
Alexander, David;
Williams, Jonathan;
Goldsmith, Paul;
Wyatt, Mark;
Loinard, Laurent;
Di Francesco, James;
Wilner, David;
Schilke, Peter;
Ginsburg, Adam;
Sánchez-Monge, Álvaro;
Zhang, Qizhou;
Beuther, Henrik
Submitted: 2015-10-21
This paper discusses compelling science cases for a future long-baseline
interferometer operating at millimeter and centimeter wavelengths, like the
proposed Next Generation Vary Large Array (ngVLA). We report on the activities
of the Cradle of Life science working group, which focused on the formation of
low- and high-mass stars, the formation of planets and evolution of
protoplanetary disks, the physical and compositional study of Solar System
bodies, and the possible detection of radio signals from extraterrestrial
civilizations. We propose 19 scientific projects based on the current
specification of the ngVLA. Five of them are highlighted as possible Key
Science Projects: (1) Resolving the density structure and dynamics of the
youngest HII regions and high-mass protostellar jets, (2) Unveiling
binary/multiple protostars at higher resolution, (3) Mapping planet formation
regions in nearby disks on scales down to 1 AU, (4) Studying the formation of
complex molecules, and (5) Deep atmospheric mapping of giant planets in the
Solar System. For each of these projects, we discuss the scientific importance
and feasibility. The results presented here should be considered as the
beginning of a more in-depth analysis of the science enabled by such a
facility, and are by no means complete or exhaustive.