Normalized to: Herman, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.05508 [pdf] - 2131999
Detection of Fe\,{\sc i} Emission in the Day-side Spectrum of WASP-33b
Submitted: 2020-07-10
We analyze the high-resolution emission spectrum of WASP-33b taken using the
High Dispersion Spectrograph (R\,$\approx$\,165,000) on the 8.2-m Subaru
telescope. The data cover $\lambda$\,$\approx$\,$6170$-$8817$\,\AA, divided
over 30 spectral orders. The telluric and stellar lines are removed using a
de-trending algorithm, {\sc SysRem}, before cross-correlating with planetary
spectral templates. We calculate the templates assuming a 1-D plane-parallel
hydrostatic atmosphere including continuum opacity of bound-free H$^{-}$ and
Rayleigh scattering by H$_{2}$ with a range of constant abundances of Fe\,{\sc
i}. Using a likelihood-mapping analysis, we detect an Fe\,{\sc i} emission
signature at 6.4-$\sigma$ located at $K_{\mathrm{p}}$ of
226.0\,$^{+2.1}_{-2.3}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$and $v_{\mathrm{sys}}$ of
-3.2\,$^{+2.1}_{-1.8}$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ -- consistent with the planet's expected
velocity in the literature. We also confirm the existence of a thermal
inversion in the day-side of the planet which is very likely to be caused by
the presence of Fe\,{\sc i} and previously-detected TiO in the atmosphere. This
makes WASP-33b one of the prime targets to study the relative contributions of
both species to the energy budget of an ultra-hot Jupiter.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.10743 [pdf] - 2117765
Search for TiO and Optical Night-side Emission from the Exoplanet
WASP-33b
Submitted: 2020-06-18
With a temperature akin to an M-dwarf, WASP-33b is among the hottest Jupiters
known, making it an ideal target for high-resolution optical spectroscopy. By
analyzing both transmission and emission spectra, we aim to substantiate
previous reports of atmospheric TiO and a thermal inversion within the planet's
atmosphere. We observed two transits and six arcs of the phase curve with
ESPaDOns on the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and HIRES on the Keck telescope,
which provide high spectral resolution and ample wavelength coverage. We employ
the Doppler cross-correlation technique to search for the molecular signatures
of TiO and H$_2$O in these spectra, using models based on the TiO line list of
Plez (2012). Though we cannot exclude line-list-dependent effects, our data do
not corroborate previous indications of a thermal inversion. Instead we place a
$3\sigma$ upper limit of $10^{-9}$ on the volume mixing ratio of TiO for the
T-P profile we consider. While we are unable to constrain the volume mixing
ratio of water, our strongest constraint on TiO comes from day-side emission
spectra. This apparent absence of a stratosphere sits in stark contrast to
previous observations of WASP-33b as well as theoretical predictions for the
atmospheres of highly irradiated planets. The discrepancy could be due to
variances between line lists, and we stress that detection limits are only as
good as the line list employed, and are only valid for the specific T-P profile
considered due to the strong degeneracy between lapse rate ($dT/d\log P$) and
molecular abundance.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.01974 [pdf] - 1916787
Revisiting the Long-Period Transiting Planets from Kepler
Submitted: 2019-01-07, last modified: 2019-05-30
Currently, we have only limited means to probe the presence of planets at
large orbital separations. Foreman-Mackey et al. searched for long-period
transiting planets in the Kepler light curves using an automated pipeline.
Here, we apply their pipeline, with minor modifications, to a larger sample and
use updated stellar parameters from Gaia DR2. The latter boosts the stellar
radii for most of the planet candidates found by FM16, invalidating a number of
them as false positives. We identify 15 candidates, including two new ones. All
have sizes from 0.3 to 1 $R_{\rm J}$, and all but two have periods from 2 to 10
yr. We report two main findings based on this sample. First, the planet
occurrence rate for the above size and period ranges is $0.70^{+0.40}_{-0.20}$
planets per Sun-like star, with the frequency of cold Jupiters agreeing with
that from radial velocity surveys. Planet occurrence rises with decreasing
planet size, roughly describable as $dN/d\log R \propto R^{\alpha}$ with
$\alpha = -1.6^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$, i.e., Neptune-sized planets are some four times
more common than Jupiter-sized ones. Second, five out of our 15 candidates
orbit stars with known transiting planets at shorter periods, including one
with five inner planets. We interpret this high incidence rate to mean: (1)
almost all our candidates should be genuine; (2) across a large orbital range
(from $\sim 0.05$ to a few astronomical units), mutual inclinations in these
systems are at most a few degrees; and (3) large outer planets exist almost
exclusively in systems with small inner planets.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1711.02681 [pdf] - 1608595
Spin-Orbit Misalignment and Precession in the Kepler-13Ab Planetary
System
Submitted: 2017-11-07
Gravity darkening induced by rapid stellar rotation provides us with a unique
opportunity to characterize the spin-orbit misalignment of a planetary system
through analysis of its photometric transit. We use the gravity-darkened
transit modeling code simuTrans to reproduce the transit light curve of
Kepler-13Ab by separately analyzing phase-folded transits for 12 short-cadence
Kepler quarters. We verify the temporal change in impact parameter indicative
of spin-orbit precession identified by Szab\'o et al. (2012) and Masuda (2015),
reporting a rate of change $db/dt = (-4.1 \pm 0.2) \times 10^{-5}$ day$^{-1}$.
We further investigate the effect of light dilution on the fitted impact
parameter and find that less than 1% of additional light is sufficient to
explain the seasonal variation seen in the Kepler quarter data. We then extend
our precession analysis to the phase curve data from which we report a rate of
change $db/dt = (-3.2 \pm 1.3) \times 10^{-5}$ day$^{-1}$. This value is
consistent with that of the transit data at a lower significance and provides
the first evidence of spin-orbit precession based solely on the temporal
variation of the secondary eclipse.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1005.5123 [pdf] - 1032799
The Herschel-SPIRE instrument and its in-flight performance
Griffin, M. J.;
Abergel, A.;
Abreu, A.;
Ade, P. A. R.;
André, P.;
Augueres, J. -L.;
Babbedge, T.;
Bae, Y.;
Baillie, T.;
Baluteau, J. -P.;
Barlow, M. J.;
Bendo, G.;
Benielli, D.;
Bock, J. J.;
Bonhomme, P.;
Brisbin, D.;
Brockley-Blatt, C.;
Caldwell, M.;
Cara, C.;
Castro-Rodriguez, N.;
Cerulli, R.;
Chanial, P.;
Chen, S.;
Clark, E.;
Clements, D. L.;
Clerc, L.;
Coker, J.;
Communal, D.;
Conversi, L.;
Cox, P.;
Crumb, D.;
Cunningham, C.;
Daly, F.;
Davis, G. R.;
De Antoni, P.;
Delderfield, J.;
Devin, N.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Didschuns, I.;
Dohlen, K.;
Donati, M.;
Dowell, A.;
Dowell, C. D.;
Duband, L.;
Dumaye, L.;
Emery, R. J.;
Ferlet, M.;
Ferrand, D.;
Fontignie, J.;
Fox, M.;
Franceschini, A.;
Frerking, M.;
Fulton, T.;
Garcia, J.;
Gastaud, R.;
Gear, W. K.;
Glenn, J.;
Goizel, A.;
Griffin, D. K.;
Grundy, T.;
Guest, S.;
Guillemet, L.;
Hargrave, P. C.;
Harwit, M.;
Hastings, P.;
Hatziminaoglou, E.;
Herman, M.;
Hinde, B.;
Hristov, V.;
Huang, M.;
Imhof, P.;
Isaak, K. J.;
Israelsson, U.;
Ivison, R. J.;
Jennings, D.;
Kiernan, B.;
King, K. J.;
Lange, A. E.;
Latter, W.;
Laurent, G.;
Laurent, P.;
Leeks, S. J.;
Lellouch, E.;
Levenson, L.;
Li, B.;
Li, J.;
Lilienthal, J.;
Lim, T.;
Liu, J.;
Lu, N.;
Madden, S.;
Mainetti, G.;
Marliani, P.;
McKay, D.;
Mercier, K.;
Molinari, S.;
Morris, H.;
Moseley, H.;
Mulder, J.;
Mur, M.;
Naylor, D. A.;
Nguyen, H.;
O'Halloran, B.;
Oliver, S.;
Olofsson, G.;
Olofsson, H. -G.;
Orfei, R.;
Page, M. J.;
Pain, I.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Papageorgiou, A.;
Parks, G.;
Parr-Burman, P.;
Pearce, A.;
Pearson, C.;
Pérez-Fournon, I.;
Pinsard, F.;
Pisano, G.;
Podosek, J.;
Pohlen, M.;
Polehampton, E. T.;
Pouliquen, D.;
Rigopoulou, D.;
Rizzo, D.;
Roseboom, I. G.;
Roussel, H.;
Rowan-Robinson, M.;
Rownd, B.;
Saraceno, P.;
Sauvage, M.;
Savage, R.;
Savini, G.;
Sawyer, E.;
Scharmberg, C.;
Schmitt, D.;
Schneider, N.;
Schulz, B.;
Schwartz, A.;
Shafer, R.;
Shupe, D. L.;
Sibthorpe, B.;
Sidher, S.;
Smith, A.;
Smith, A. J.;
Smith, D.;
Spencer, L.;
Stobie, B.;
Sudiwala, R.;
Sukhatme, K.;
Surace, C.;
Stevens, J. A.;
Swinyard, B. M.;
Trichas, M.;
Tourette, T.;
Triou, H.;
Tseng, S.;
Tucker, C.;
Turner, A.;
Vaccari, M.;
Valtchanov, I.;
Vigroux, L.;
Virique, E.;
Voellmer, G.;
Walker, H.;
Ward, R.;
Waskett, T.;
Weilert, M.;
Wesson, R.;
White, G. J.;
Whitehouse, N.;
Wilson, C. D.;
Winter, B.;
Woodcraft, A. L.;
Wright, G. S.;
Xu, C. K.;
Zavagno, A.;
Zemcov, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zonca, E.
Submitted: 2010-05-27
The Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE), is the Herschel Space
Observatory`s submillimetre camera and spectrometer. It contains a three-band
imaging photometer operating at 250, 350 and 500 microns, and an imaging
Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS) which covers simultaneously its whole
operating range of 194-671 microns (447-1550 GHz). The SPIRE detectors are
arrays of feedhorn-coupled bolometers cooled to 0.3 K. The photometer has a
field of view of 4' x 8', observed simultaneously in the three spectral bands.
Its main operating mode is scan-mapping, whereby the field of view is scanned
across the sky to achieve full spatial sampling and to cover large areas if
desired. The spectrometer has an approximately circular field of view with a
diameter of 2.6'. The spectral resolution can be adjusted between 1.2 and 25
GHz by changing the stroke length of the FTS scan mirror. Its main operating
mode involves a fixed telescope pointing with multiple scans of the FTS mirror
to acquire spectral data. For extended source measurements, multiple position
offsets are implemented by means of an internal beam steering mirror to achieve
the desired spatial sampling and by rastering of the telescope pointing to map
areas larger than the field of view. The SPIRE instrument consists of a cold
focal plane unit located inside the Herschel cryostat and warm electronics
units, located on the spacecraft Service Module, for instrument control and
data handling. Science data are transmitted to Earth with no on-board data
compression, and processed by automatic pipelines to produce calibrated science
products. The in-flight performance of the instrument matches or exceeds
predictions based on pre-launch testing and modelling: the photometer
sensitivity is comparable to or slightly better than estimated pre-launch, and
the spectrometer sensitivity is also better by a factor of 1.5-2.