Normalized to: Henttunen, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.6035 [pdf] - 1042998
Is scalar-tensor gravity consistent with polytropic stellar models?
Submitted: 2014-08-26, last modified: 2015-03-01
We study the scalar field potential $V(\phi)$ in the scalar-tensor gravity
with self-consistent polytropic stellar configurations. Without choosing a
particular potential, we numerically derive the potential inside various
stellar objects. We restrict the potential to conform to general relativity or
to $f(R)$ gravity inside and require the solution to arrive at SdS vacuum at
the surface. The studied objects are required to obtain observationally valid
masses and radii corresponding to solar type stars, white dwarfs and neutron
stars. We find that the resulting scalar-tensor potential $V(\phi)$ for the
numerically derived polytrope that conforms to general relativity, in each
object class, is highly dependent on the matter configuration as well as on the
vacuum requirement at the boundary. As a result, every stellar configuration
arrives at a potential $V(\phi)$ that is not consistent with the other stellar
class potentials. Therefore, a general potential that conforms to all these
polytropic stellar classes could not be found.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6711 [pdf] - 801203
Consistency of $f(R)$ gravity models around solar polytropes
Submitted: 2011-10-31, last modified: 2014-03-25
It is stated that a class of $f(R)$ gravity models seem to obtain
$\Lambda$CDM behaviour for high redshifts and general relativistic behaviour
locally at high curvatures. In the present paper, we numerically study
polytropic configurations that resemble stars like young sun with Hu and
Sawicki $f(R)$ gravity field equations and compare the spacetime at the
boundary to the general relativistic counterpart. These polytropes are
stationary spherically symmetric configurations and have regular metrics at the
origin. Since Birkhoff's theorem does not apply for modified gravity, the
solution outside may deviate from Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime. At the
boundary, Post-Newtonian parametrization was used to determine how much the
studied model deviates from the general relativistic $\Lambda$CDM model.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0705.2683 [pdf] - 1397
Stellar configurations in f(R) theories of gravity
Submitted: 2007-05-18, last modified: 2007-05-28
We study stellar configurations and the space-time around them in metric
$f(R)$ theories of gravity. In particular, we focus on the polytropic model of
the Sun in the $f(R)=R-\mu^4/R$ model. We show how the stellar configuration in
the $f(R)$ theory can, by appropriate initial conditions, be selected to be
equal to that described by the Lane-Emden -equation and how a simple scaling
relation exists between the solutions. We also derive the correct solution
analytically near the center of the star in $f(R)$ theory. Previous analytical
and numerical results are confirmed, indicating that the space-time around the
Sun is incompatible with Solar System constraints on the properties of gravity.
Numerical work shows that stellar configurations, with a regular metric at the
center, lead to $\gamma_{PPN}\simeq1/2$ outside the star ie. the
Schwarzschild-de Sitter -space-time is not the correct vacuum solution for such
configurations. Conversely, by selecting the Schwarzschild-de Sitter -metric as
the outside solution, we find that the stellar configuration is unchanged but
the metric is irregular at the center. The possibility of constructing a $f(R)$
theory compatible with the Solar System experiments and possible new
constraints arising from the radius-mass -relation of stellar objects is
discussed.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511714 [pdf] - 78072
Complex supergravity quintessence models confronted with Sn Ia data
Submitted: 2005-11-25
A class of supergravity inspired quintessence models is studied by comparing
to cosmological data. The set of considered models includes several previously
studied quintessential potentials, as well as the $\Lambda$CDM model. We find
that even though the commonly studied supergravity inspired quintessence models
fit the data better than the $\Lambda$CDM model, they are a relatively poor fit
when compared to the best fit model in the studied class. Our results suggest a
low energy scale, less than ${\cal{M}}\sim 1$ TeV, for the effective
supergravity potential.