Normalized to: Heinrich, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.03138 [pdf] - 2109249
Cross-bispectra Constraints on Modified Gravity Theories from Nancy
Grace Roman Space Telescope and Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and
Time
Submitted: 2020-06-04
One major goal of upcoming large-scale-structure surveys is to constrain dark
energy and modified gravity theories. In particular, galaxy clustering and
gravitational lensing convergence are probes sensitive to modifications of
general relativity. While the standard analysis for these surveys typically
includes power spectra or 2-point correlation functions, it is known that the
bispectrum contains more information, and could offer improved constraints on
parameters when combined with the power spectra. However, the use of bispectra
has been limited so far to one single probe, e.g. the lensing convergence
bispectrum or the galaxy bispectrum. In this paper, we extend the formalism to
explore the power of cross-bispectra between different probes, and exploit
their ability to break parameter degeneracies and improve constraints. We study
this on a test case of lensing convergence and galaxy density auto- and
cross-bispectra, for a particular sub-class of Horndeski theories parametrized
by $c_M$ and $c_B$. Using the 2000 deg$^2$ notional survey of the Nancy Grace
Roman Space Telescope with overlapping photometry from the Rubin Observatory
Legacy Survey of Space and Time, we find that a joint power spectra and
bispectra analysis with three redshift bins at $l_{\rm max} = 1000$ yields
$\sigma_{c_M} = 1.0$ and $\sigma_{c_B} = 0.3$, both a factor of $\sim$1.2
better than the power spectra results; this would be further improved to
$\sigma_{c_M} = 0.7$ and $\sigma_{c_B} = 0.2$ if $l_{\rm max} = 3000$ is taken.
Furthermore, we find that using all possible cross-bispectra between the two
probes in different tomographic bins improves upon auto-bispectra results by a
factor of 1.3 in $\sigma_{c_M}$, 1.1 in $\sigma_{c_B}$ and 1.3 in
$\sigma_{\Omega_m}$. We expect that similar benefits of using cross-bispectra
between probes could apply to other science cases and surveys.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.04702 [pdf] - 2077370
Cosmology with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope -- Synergies
with the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time
Eifler, Tim;
Simet, Melanie;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Hirata, Christopher;
Huang, Hung-Jin;
Fang, Xiao;
Miranda, Vivian;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Doux, Cyrille;
Heinrich, Chen;
Huff, Eric;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Xu, Jiachuan;
Rogozenski, Paul;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Dore, Olivier;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jarvis, Mike;
MacCrann, Niall;
Masters, Dan;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Spergel, David N.;
Troxel, Michael;
von der Linden, Anja;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David H.;
Wenzl, Lukas;
Wu, Hao-Yi
Submitted: 2020-04-09, last modified: 2020-04-11
We explore synergies between the space-based Wide-Field Infrared Survey
Telescope (WFIRST) and the ground-based Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of
Space and Time (LSST). In particular, we consider a scenario where the
currently envisioned survey strategy for WFIRST's High Latitude Survey (HLS),
i.e., 2000 square degrees in four narrow photometric bands is altered in favor
of a strategy that combines rapid coverage of the LSST area (to full LSST
depth) in one band. We find that a 5-month WFIRST survey in the W-band can
cover the full LSST survey area providing high-resolution imaging for >95% of
the LSST Year 10 gold galaxy sample. We explore a second, more ambitious
scenario where WFIRST spends 1.5 years covering the LSST area. For this second
scenario we quantify the constraining power on dark energy equation of state
parameters from a joint weak lensing and galaxy clustering analysis, and
compare it to an LSST-only survey and to the Reference WFIRST HLS survey. Our
survey simulations are based on the WFIRST exposure time calculator and
redshift distributions from the CANDELS catalog. Our statistical uncertainties
account for higher-order correlations of the density field, and we include a
wide range of systematic effects, such as uncertainties in shape and redshift
measurements, and modeling uncertainties of astrophysical systematics, such as
galaxy bias, intrinsic galaxy alignment, and baryonic physics. Assuming the
5-month WFIRST wide scenario, we find a significant increase in constraining
power for the joint LSST+WFIRST wide survey compared to LSST Y10 (FoM(Wwide)=
2.4 FoM(LSST)) and compared to LSST+WFIRST HLS (FoM(Wwide)= 5.5 FoM(HLS)).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.05271 [pdf] - 2077420
Cosmology with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope -- Multi-Probe
Strategies
Eifler, Tim;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Heinrich, Chen;
Miranda, Vivian;
Hirata, Christopher;
Xu, Jiachuan;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Simet, Melanie;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Dore, Olivier;
Doux, Cyrille;
Fang, Xiao;
Hounsell, Rebekah;
Huff, Eric;
Huang, Hung-Jin;
Jarvis, Mike;
Masters, Dan;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Scolnic, Dan;
Spergel, David N.;
Troxel, Michael;
von der Linden, Anja;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David H.;
Wenzl, Lukas;
Wu, Hao-Yi
Submitted: 2020-04-10
We simulate the scientific performance of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey
Telescope (WFIRST) High Latitude Survey (HLS) on dark energy and modified
gravity. The 1.6 year HLS Reference survey is currently envisioned to image
2000 deg$^2$ in multiple bands to a depth of $\sim$26.5 in Y, J, H and to cover
the same area with slit-less spectroscopy beyond z=3. The combination of deep,
multi-band photometry and deep spectroscopy will allow scientists to measure
the growth and geometry of the Universe through a variety of cosmological
probes (e.g., weak lensing, galaxy clusters, galaxy clustering, BAO, Type Ia
supernova) and, equally, it will allow an exquisite control of observational
and astrophysical systematic effects. In this paper we explore multi-probe
strategies that can be implemented given WFIRST's instrument capabilities. We
model cosmological probes individually and jointly and account for correlated
systematics and statistical uncertainties due to the higher order moments of
the density field. We explore different levels of observational systematics for
the WFIRST survey (photo-z and shear calibration) and ultimately run a joint
likelihood analysis in N-dim parameter space. We find that the WFIRST reference
survey alone (no external data sets) can achieve a standard dark energy FoM of
>300 when including all probes. This assumes no information from external data
sets and realistic assumptions for systematics. Our study of the HLS reference
survey should be seen as part of a future community driven effort to simulate
and optimize the science return of WFIRST.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.00024 [pdf] - 2007899
BAO Modulation as a Probe of Compensated Isocurvature Perturbations
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-12-02
Compensated isocurvature perturbations (CIPs) are opposite spatial
fluctuations in the baryon and dark matter density. They can be generated for
example in the curvaton model in the early Universe but are difficult to
observe because their gravitational imprint nearly cancels. We therefore
propose a new measurement method by searching for a spatial modulation of the
baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale that CIPs induce. We find that for a
Euclid-like survey the sensitivity is marginally better than the WMAP cosmic
microwave background (CMB) constraint, which exploits the CIP-induced
modulation of the CMB sound horizon. For a cosmic-variance limited BAO survey
using emission-line galaxies up to $z\sim7$ the sensitivity is between stage 3
and stage 4 CMB experiments. These results include using CIP-galaxy
cross-correlations, which improves the sensitivity by a factor of $\sim2-3$ for
correlated CIPs. The method could be further improved with an optimal
estimator, similarly to the CMB, and could provide a useful cross-check of
other CIP probes. Finally, if CIPs exist, they can bias cosmological
measurements made assuming no CIPs. In particular, they can act as a
super-sample fluctuation of the baryon density and bias measurements of the BAO
scale. For modern BAO surveys, the largest 2$\sigma$ CIP fluctuation allowed by
Planck's 95\% bound could bias BAO measurements of $H(z)$ by 2.2\%, partially
reducing the tension with the local $H_0$ measurements from 3.1$\sigma$ to
2.3$\sigma$.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.01174 [pdf] - 1860134
WFIRST: The Essential Cosmology Space Observatory for the Coming Decade
Doré, O.;
Hirata, C.;
Wang, Y.;
Weinberg, D.;
Eifler, T.;
Foley, R. J.;
Heinrich, C. He;
Krause, E.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Pisani, A.;
Scolnic, D.;
Spergel, D. N.;
Suntzeff, N.;
Aldering, G.;
Baltay, C.;
Capak, P.;
Choi, A.;
Deustua, S.;
Dvorkin, C.;
Fall, S. M.;
Fang, X.;
Fruchter, A.;
Galbany, L.;
Ho, S.;
Hounsell, R.;
Izard, A.;
Jain, B.;
Koekemoer, A. M.;
Kruk, J.;
Leauthaud, A.;
Malhotra, S.;
Mandelbaum, R.;
Massara, E.;
Masters, D.;
Miyatake, H.;
Plazas, A.;
Rhoads, J.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rose, B.;
Rubin, D.;
Sako, M.;
Samushia, L.;
Shirasaki, M.;
Simet, M.;
Takada, M.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Wu, H.;
Yoshida, N.;
Zhai, Z.
Submitted: 2019-04-01
Two decades after its discovery, cosmic acceleration remains the most
profound mystery in cosmology and arguably in all of physics. Either the
Universe is dominated by a form of dark energy with exotic physical properties
not predicted by standard model physics, or General Relativity is not an
adequate description of gravity over cosmic distances. WFIRST emerged as a top
priority of Astro2010 in part because of its ability to address the mystery of
cosmic acceleration through both high precision measurements of the cosmic
expansion history and the growth of cosmic structures with multiple and
redundant probes. We illustrate in this white paper how mission design changes
since Astro2010 have made WFIRST an even more powerful dark energy facility and
have improved the ability of WFIRST to respond to changes in the experimental
landscape. WFIRST is the space-based probe of DE the community needs in the
mid-2020s.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.05569 [pdf] - 1832668
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
Akeson, Rachel;
Armus, Lee;
Bachelet, Etienne;
Bailey, Vanessa;
Bartusek, Lisa;
Bellini, Andrea;
Benford, Dominic;
Bennett, David;
Bhattacharya, Aparna;
Bohlin, Ralph;
Boyer, Martha;
Bozza, Valerio;
Bryden, Geoffrey;
Novati, Sebastiano Calchi;
Carpenter, Kenneth;
Casertano, Stefano;
Choi, Ami;
Content, David;
Dayal, Pratika;
Dressler, Alan;
Doré, Olivier;
Fall, S. Michael;
Fan, Xiaohui;
Fang, Xiao;
Filippenko, Alexei;
Finkelstein, Steven;
Foley, Ryan;
Furlanetto, Steven;
Kalirai, Jason;
Gaudi, B. Scott;
Gilbert, Karoline;
Girard, Julien;
Grady, Kevin;
Greene, Jenny;
Guhathakurta, Puragra;
Heinrich, Chen;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Hendel, David;
Henderson, Calen;
Henning, Thomas;
Hirata, Christopher;
Ho, Shirley;
Huff, Eric;
Hutter, Anne;
Jansen, Rolf;
Jha, Saurabh;
Johnson, Samson;
Jones, David;
Kasdin, Jeremy;
Kelly, Patrick;
Kirshner, Robert;
Koekemoer, Anton;
Kruk, Jeffrey;
Lewis, Nikole;
Macintosh, Bruce;
Madau, Piero;
Malhotra, Sangeeta;
Mandel, Kaisey;
Massara, Elena;
Masters, Daniel;
McEnery, Julie;
McQuinn, Kristen;
Melchior, Peter;
Melton, Mark;
Mennesson, Bertrand;
Peeples, Molly;
Penny, Matthew;
Perlmutter, Saul;
Pisani, Alice;
Plazas, Andrés;
Poleski, Radek;
Postman, Marc;
Ranc, Clément;
Rauscher, Bernard;
Rest, Armin;
Roberge, Aki;
Robertson, Brant;
Rodney, Steven;
Rhoads, James;
Rhodes, Jason;
Ryan, Russell;
Sahu, Kailash;
Sand, David;
Scolnic, Dan;
Seth, Anil;
Shvartzvald, Yossi;
Siellez, Karelle;
Smith, Arfon;
Spergel, David;
Stassun, Keivan;
Street, Rachel;
Strolger, Louis-Gregory;
Szalay, Alexander;
Trauger, John;
Troxel, M. A.;
Turnbull, Margaret;
van der Marel, Roeland;
von der Linden, Anja;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David;
Williams, Benjamin;
Windhorst, Rogier;
Wollack, Edward;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Yee, Jennifer;
Zimmerman, Neil
Submitted: 2019-02-14
The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) is a 2.4m space telescope
with a 0.281 deg^2 field of view for near-IR imaging and slitless spectroscopy
and a coronagraph designed for > 10^8 starlight suppresion. As background
information for Astro2020 white papers, this article summarizes the current
design and anticipated performance of WFIRST. While WFIRST does not have the UV
imaging/spectroscopic capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope, for wide
field near-IR surveys WFIRST is hundreds of times more efficient. Some of the
most ambitious multi-cycle HST Treasury programs could be executed as routine
General Observer (GO) programs on WFIRST. The large area and time-domain
surveys planned for the cosmology and exoplanet microlensing programs will
produce extraordinarily rich data sets that enable an enormous range of
Archival Research (AR) investigations. Requirements for the coronagraph are
defined based on its status as a technology demonstration, but its expected
performance will enable unprecedented observations of nearby giant exoplanets
and circumstellar disks. WFIRST is currently in the Preliminary Design and
Technology Completion phase (Phase B), on schedule for launch in 2025, with
several of its critical components already in production.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.01858 [pdf] - 1750791
Inflationary vs. Reionization Features from Planck 2015 Data
Submitted: 2018-03-05, last modified: 2018-07-09
Features during inflation and reionization leave corresponding features in
the temperature and polarization power spectra that could potentially explain
anomalies in the Planck 2015 data but require a joint analysis to disentangle.
We study the interplay between these two effects using a model-independent
parametrization of the inflationary power spectrum and the ionization history.
Preference for a sharp suppression of large scale power is driven by a feature
in the temperature power spectrum at multipoles $\ell \sim 20$, whereas
preference for a component of high redshift ionization is driven by a sharp
excess of polarization power at $\ell \sim 10$ when compared with the lowest
multipoles. Marginalizing inflationary freedom does not weaken the preference
for $z \gtrsim 10$ ionization, whereas marginalizing reionization freedom
slightly enhances the preference for an inflationary feature but can also mask
its direct signature in polarization. The inflation and reionization
interpretation of these features makes predictions for the polarization
spectrum which can be tested in future precision measurements especially at
$10\lesssim \ell \lesssim 40$.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.00791 [pdf] - 1751748
Does Planck 2015 polarization favor high redshift reionization?
Submitted: 2018-02-02, last modified: 2018-06-11
We study the relationship between signatures of high redshift ionization in
large-angle CMB polarization power spectra and features in the Planck 2015
data. Using a principal component (PC) ionization basis that is complete to the
cosmic variance limit out to $z_{\rm max}=30,40,50$, we find a robust $>95\%$
CL preference for ionization at $z>15$ with no preference for $z>40$. This
robustness originates from the $\ell \sim 10$ region of the data which show
high power relative to $\ell \le 8$ and result in a poor fit to a steplike
model of reionization. Instead by allowing for high redshift reionization, the
PCs provide a better fit by $2\Delta \mathrm{ln}\mathcal{L} = 5-6$. Due to a
degeneracy in the ionization redshift response, this improved fit is due to a
single aspect of the model: the ability to accommodate $z>10$ component to the
ionization as we illustrate with a two-step reionization model. For this and
other models that accommodate such a component, its presence is allowed and
even favored; for models that do not, their poor fit reflects statistical or
systematic fluctuations. These possibilities produce very different and
testable predictions at $\ell \sim 15-20$, as well as small but detectable
differences at $\ell>30$ that can further restrict the high redshift limit of
reionization.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03628 [pdf] - 1663504
WFIRST Science Investigation Team "Cosmology with the High Latitude
Survey" Annual Report 2017
Doré, Olivier;
Hirata, Christopher;
Wang, Yun;
Weinberg, David;
Baronchelli, Ivano;
Benson, Andrew;
Capak, Peter;
Choi, Ami;
Eifler, Tim;
Hemmati, Shoubaneh;
Ho, Shirley;
Izard, Albert;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kiessling, Alina;
Krause, Elisabeth;
Massara, Elena;
Masters, Dan;
Merson, Alex;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Malagon, Andres Plazas;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Samushia, Lado;
Shapiro, Chaz;
Simet, Melanie;
Spergel, David;
Teplitz, Harry;
Troxel, Michael;
Bean, Rachel;
Colbert, James;
Heinrich, Chen He;
Heitmann, Katrin;
Helou, George;
Hudson, Michael;
Huff, Eric;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
MacCrann, Niall;
Padmanabhan, Nikhil;
Pisani, Alice;
Rhodes, Jason;
Rozo, Eduardo;
Seiffert, Mike;
Smith, Kendrick;
Takada, Masahiro;
von der Linden, Anja;
Lupton, Robert;
Yoshida, Naoki;
Wu, Hao-Yi;
Zu, Ying
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Cosmic acceleration is the most surprising cosmological discovery in many
decades. Testing and distinguishing among possible explanations requires
cosmological measurements of extremely high precision probing the full history
of cosmic expansion and structure growth and, ideally, compare and contrast
matter and relativistic tracers of the gravity potential. This program is one
of the defining objectives of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope
(WFIRST), as set forth in the New Worlds, New Horizons report (NWNH) in 2010.
The WFIRST mission has the ability to improve these measurements by 1-2 orders
of magnitude compared to the current state of the art, while simultaneously
extending their redshift grasp, greatly improving control of systematic
effects, and taking a unified approach to multiple probes that provide
complementary physical information and cross-checks of cosmological results. We
describe in this annual report the activities of the Science Investigation Team
(SIT) "Cosmology with the High Latitude Survey (HLS)" during the year 2017.
This team was selected by NASA in December 2015 in order to address the
stringent challenges of the WFIRST dark energy (DE) program through the
Project's formulation phase. This SIT has elected to jointly address Galaxy
Redshift Survey, Weak Lensing and Cluster Growth and thus fully embrace the
fact that the imaging and spectroscopic elements of the HLS will be realized as
an integrated observing program, and they jointly impose requirements on
performance and operations. WFIRST is designed to be able to deliver a
definitive result on the origin of cosmic acceleration. It is not optimized for
Figure of Merit sensitivity but for control of systematic uncertainties and for
having multiple techniques each with multiple cross-checks. Our SIT work
focuses on understanding the potential systematics in the WFIRST DE
measurements.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01276 [pdf] - 1622244
Lensing Bias to CMB Polarization Measurements of Compensated
Isocurvature Perturbations
Submitted: 2017-08-03
Compensated isocurvature perturbations are opposite spatial fluctuations in
the baryon and dark matter (DM) densities. They arise in the curvaton model and
some models of baryogenesis. While the gravitational effects of baryon
fluctuations are compensated by those of DM, leaving no observable impacts on
the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at first order, they modulate the sound
horizon at recombination, thereby correlating CMB anisotropies at different
multipoles. As a result, CIPs can be reconstructed using quadratic estimators
similarly to CMB detection of gravitational lensing. Because of these
similarities, however, the CIP estimators are biased with lensing contributions
that must be subtracted. These lensing contributions for CMB polarization
measurement of CIPs are found to roughly triple the noise power of the total
CIP estimator on large scales. In addition, the cross power with temperature
and $E$-mode polarization are contaminated by lensing-ISW (integrated
Sachs-Wolfe) correlations and reionization-lensing correlations respectively.
For a cosmic-variance-limited (CVL) temperature and polarization experiment
measuring out to multipoles $l_{\max} = 2500$, the lensing noise raises the
detection threshold by a factor of 1.5, leaving a $2.7\sigma$ detection
possible for the maximal CIP signal in the curvaton model.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.09412 [pdf] - 1750734
Inflationary Features and Shifts in Cosmological Parameters from Planck
2015 Data
Submitted: 2017-06-28
We explore the relationship between features in the Planck 2015 temperature
and polarization data, shifts in the cosmological parameters, and features from
inflation. Residuals in the temperature data at low multipole $\ell$, which are
responsible for the high $H_0\approx 70$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$ and low
$\sigma_8\Omega_m^{1/2}$ values from $\ell<1000$ in power-law $\Lambda$CDM
models, are better fit to inflationary features with a $1.9\sigma$ preference
for running of the running of the tilt or a stronger $99\%$ CL local
significance preference for a sharp drop in power around $k=0.004$ Mpc$^{-1}$
in generalized slow roll and a lower $H_0\approx 67$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$. The
same in-phase acoustic residuals at $\ell>1000$ that drive the global $H_0$
constraints and appear as a lensing anomaly also favor running parameters which
allow even lower $H_0$, but not once lensing reconstruction is considered.
Polarization spectra are intrinsically highly sensitive to these parameter
shifts, and even more so in the Planck 2015 TE data due to an outlier at $\ell
\approx 165$, which disfavors the best fit $H_0$ $\Lambda$CDM solution by more
than $2\sigma$, and high $H_0$ value at almost $3\sigma$. Current polarization
data also slightly enhance the significance of a sharp suppression of
large-scale power but leave room for large improvements in the future with
cosmic variance limited $E$-mode measurements.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04788 [pdf] - 1750722
Complete Reionization Constraints from Planck 2015 Polarization
Submitted: 2016-09-15, last modified: 2017-04-07
We conduct an analysis of the Planck 2015 data that is complete in
reionization observables from the large angle polarization $E$-mode spectrum in
the redshift range $6 < z < 30$. Based on 5 principal components, all of which
are constrained by the data, this single analysis can be used to infer
constraints on any model for reionization in the same range; we develop an
effective likelihood approach for applying these constraints to models. By
allowing for an arbitrary ionization history, this technique tests the
robustness of inferences on the total optical depth from the usual step-like
transition assumption, which is important for the interpretation of many other
cosmological parameters such as the dark energy and neutrino mass. The Planck
2015 data not only allow a high redshift $z>15$ component to the optical depth
but prefer it at the $2\sigma$ level. This preference is associated with excess
power in the multipole range $10 \lesssim \ell \lesssim 20$ and may indicate
high redshift ionization sources or unaccounted for systematics and foregrounds
in the 2015 data.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.00691 [pdf] - 1750723
Signatures of metal-free star formation in Planck 2015 Polarization Data
Submitted: 2016-10-03
Standard analyses of the reionization history of the universe from Planck
cosmic microwave background (CMB) polarization measurements consider only the
overall optical depth to electron scattering ($\tau$), and further assume a
step-like reionization history. However, the polarization data contain
information beyond the overall optical depth, and the assumption of a step-like
function may miss high redshift contributions to the optical depth and lead to
biased $\tau$ constraints. Accounting for its full reionization information
content, we reconsider the interpretation of Planck 2015 Low Frequency
Instrument (LFI) polarization data using simple, yet physically-motivated
reionization models. We show that these measurements still, in fact, allow a
non-negligible contribution from metal-free (Pop-III) stars forming in
mini-halos of mass $M \sim 10^5-10^6 M_\odot$ at $z \gtrsim 15$, provided this
mode of star formation is fairly inefficient. Our best fit model includes an
early, self-regulated phase of Pop-III star formation in which the reionization
history has a gradual, plateau feature. In this model, $\sim$20\% of the volume
of the universe is ionized by $z \sim 20$, yet it nevertheless provides a good
match to the Planck LFI measurements. Although preferred when the full
information content of the data is incorporated, this model would spuriously be
disfavored in the standard analysis. This preference is driven mostly by excess
power from E-mode polarization at multipoles of $10 \lesssim \ell \lesssim 20$,
which may reflect remaining systematic errors in the data, a statistical
fluctuation, or signatures of the first stars. Measurements from the Planck
High Frequency Instrument (HFI) should be able to confirm or refute this hint
and future cosmic-variance limited E-mode polarization surveys can provide
substantially more information on these signatures
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.08439 [pdf] - 1475346
Lensing Bias to CMB Measurements of Compensated Isocurvature
Perturbations
Submitted: 2016-05-26
Compensated isocurvature perturbations (CIPs) are modes in which the baryon
and dark matter density fluctuations cancel. They arise in the curvaton
scenario as well as some models of baryogenesis. While they leave no observable
effects on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at linear order, they do
spatially modulate two-point CMB statistics and can be reconstructed in a
manner similar to gravitational lensing. Due to the similarity between the
effects of CMB lensing and CIPs, lensing contributes nearly Gaussian random
noise to the CIP estimator that approximately doubles the reconstruction noise
power. Additionally, the cross correlation between lensing and the integrated
Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect generates a correlation between the CIP estimator and
the temperature field even in the absence of a correlated CIP signal. For
cosmic-variance limited temperature measurements out to multipoles $l \leq
2500$, subtracting a fixed lensing bias degrades the detection threshold for
CIPs by a factor of $1.3$, whether or not they are correlated with the
adiabatic mode.