Normalized to: Hawkes, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6002 [pdf] - 788225
Meteoroid structure and ablation implications from multiple maxima
meteor light curves
Submitted: 2014-02-24
The Canadian Automated Meteor Observatory (CAMO) detects occasional meteors
with two maxima in the image intensified CCD based light curves. We report
early results from an analysis of 21 of these events. Most of these events show
qualitatively similar light curves, with a rounded luminous peak, followed by
an almost linear sharp rise in the second peak, and a relatively rapid curved
decay of the second peak. While a number of mechanisms could explain two maxima
in the light curves, numerical modelling shows that most of these events can be
matched by a simple dustball model in which some grains have been released well
before intensive ablation begins, followed by a later release of core grains at
a single time. Best fits to observations are obtained with the core grains
being larger than the pre-released outer grains, with the core grains typically
$10^{-6}$ kg while the early release grains are of the order of $10^{-9}$ kg.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0505288 [pdf] - 73058
Mass Loss Due to Sputtering and Thermal Processes in Meteoroid Ablation
Submitted: 2005-05-13
Conventional meteoroid theory assumes that the dominant mode of ablation is
by evaporation following intense heating during atmospheric flight. In this
paper we consider the question of whether sputtering may provide an alternative
disintegration process of some importance.For meteoroids in the mass range from
10^-3 to 10^-13 kg and covering a meteor velocity range from 11 to 71 km/s, we
numerically modeled both thermal ablation and sputtering ablation during
atmospheric flight. We considered three meteoroid models believed to be
representative of asteroidal (3300 kg m^-3 mass density), cometary (1000 kg
m^-3) and porous cometary (300 kg m^-3) meteoroid structures. Atmospheric
profiles which considered the molecular compositions at different heights were
used in the sputtering calculations. We find that while in many cases
(particularly at low velocities and for relatively large meteoroid masses)
sputtering contributes only a small amount of mass loss during atmospheric
flight, in some cases sputtering is very important. For example, a 10^-10 kg
porous meteoroid at 40 km/s will lose nearly 51% of its mass by sputtering,
while a 10^-13 kg asteroidal meteoroid at 60 km/s will lose nearly 83% of its
mass by sputtering. We argue that sputtering may explain the light production
observed at very great heights in some Leonid meteors. The impact of this work
will be most dramatic for very small meteoroids such as those observed with
large aperture radars.