Normalized to: Harshman, K.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.04531 [pdf] - 1622198
OCAMS: The OSIRIS-REx Camera Suite
Rizk, B.;
d'Aubigny, C. Drouet;
Golish, D.;
Fellows, C.;
Merrill, C.;
Smith, P.;
Walker, M. S.;
Hendershot, J. E.;
Hancock, J.;
Bailey, S. H.;
DellaGiustina, D.;
Lauretta, D.;
Tanner, R.;
Williams, M.;
Harshman, K.;
Fitzgibbon, M.;
Verts, W.;
Chen, J.;
Connors, T.;
Hamara, D.;
Dowd, A.;
Lowman, A.;
Dubin, M.;
Burt, R.;
Whiteley, M.;
Watson, M.;
McMahon, T.;
Ward, M.;
Booher, D.;
Read, M.;
Williams, B.;
Hunten, M.;
Little, E.;
Saltzman, T.;
Alfred, D.;
Dougherty, S. O;
Walthall, M.;
Kenagy, K.;
Peterson, S.;
Crowther, B.;
Perry, M. L.;
See, C.;
Selznick, S.;
Sauve, C.;
Beiser, M.;
Black, W.;
Pfisterer, R. N.;
Lancaster, A.;
Oliver, S.;
Oquest, C.;
Crowley, D.;
Morgan, C.;
Castle, C.;
Dominguez, R.;
Sullivan, M.
Submitted: 2017-04-14
The requirements-driven OSIRIS-REx Camera Suite (OCAMS) acquires images
essential to collecting a sample from the surface of Bennu. During proximity
operations, these images document the presence of satellites and plumes, record
spin state, enable an accurate digital terrain model of the shape of the
asteroid and identify any surface hazards. They confirm the presence of
sampleable regolith on the surface, observe the sampling event itself, and
image the sample head in order to verify its readiness to be stowed. They
document the history of Bennu as an example of early solar system material, as
a microgravity body with a planetesimal size-scale, and as a carbonaceous
object. OCAMS is fitted with three cameras. The MapCam records point-source
color images on approach to the asteroid in order to connect ground-based
point-source observations of Bennu to later higher-resolution surface spectral
imaging. The SamCam documents the sample site before, during, and after it is
disturbed by the sample mechanism. The PolyCam, using its focus mechanism,
observes the sample site at sub-centimeter resolutions, revealing surface
texture and morphology. While their imaging requirements divide naturally
between the three cameras, they preserve a strong degree of functional overlap.
OCAMS and the other spacecraft instruments allow the OSIRIS-REx mission to
collect a sample from a microgravity body on the same visit during which it was
first optically acquired from long range, a useful capability as humanity
explores near-Earth, Main-Belt and Jupiter Trojan asteroids.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5734 [pdf] - 755152
The ultraluminous GRB 110918A
Frederiks, D. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Mangano, V.;
Oates, S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Kokomov, A. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
Starr, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Goldstein, J.
Submitted: 2013-11-22
GRB 110918A is the brightest long GRB detected by Konus-WIND during its 19
years of continuous observations and the most luminous GRB ever observed since
the beginning of the cosmological era in 1997. We report on the final IPN
localization of this event and its detailed multiwavelength study with a number
of space-based instruments. The prompt emission is characterized by a typical
duration, a moderare $E_{peak}$ of the time-integrated spectrum, and strong
hard-to-soft evolution. The high observed energy fluence yields, at z=0.984, a
huge isotropic-equivalent energy release $E_{iso}=(2.1\pm0.1)\times10^{54}$
erg. The record-breaking energy flux observed at the peak of the short, bright,
hard initial pulse results in an unprecedented isotropic-equivalent luminosity
$L_{iso}=(4.7\pm0.2)\times10^{54}$erg s$^{-1}$. A tail of the soft gamma-ray
emission was detected with temporal and spectral behavior typical of that
predicted by the synchrotron forward-shock model. Swift/XRT and Swift/UVOT
observed the bright afterglow from 1.2 to 48 days after the burst and revealed
no evidence of a jet break. The post-break scenario for the afterglow is
preferred from our analysis, with a hard underlying electron spectrum and
ISM-like circumburst environment implied. We conclude that, among multiple
reasons investigated, the tight collimation of the jet must have been a key
ingredient to produce this unusually bright burst. The inferred jet opening
angle of 1.7-3.4 deg results in reasonable values of the collimation-corrected
radiated energy and the peak luminosity, which, however, are still at the top
of their distributions for such tightly collimated events. We estimate a
detection horizon for a similar ultraluminous GRB of $z\sim7.5$ for Konus-WIND,
and $z\sim12$ for Swift/BAT, which stresses the importance of GRBs as probes of
the early Universe.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4829 [pdf] - 616849
Extremely long hard bursts observed by Konus-Wind
Pal'shin, V.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Mazets, E.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Hurley, K.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Oleynik, P.;
Ulanov, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.
Submitted: 2013-01-21
We report the observations of the prompt emission of the extremely long hard
burst, GRB 060814B, discovered by Konus-Wind and localized by the IPN. The
observations reveal a smooth, hard, ~40-min long pulse followed by weaker
emission seen several hours after the burst onset. We also present the
Konus-Wind data on similar burst, GRB 971208, localized by BATSE/IPN. And
finally we discuss the different possible origins of these unusual events.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0741 [pdf] - 1116376
Inverse Compton X-ray Emission from Supernovae with Compact Progenitors:
Application to SN2011fe
Margutti, R.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Chevalier, R.;
Hurley, K.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Hughes, J. P.;
Slane, P.;
Fransson, C.;
Moe, M.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Costa, E.;
Cummings, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Enos, H.;
Fellows, C.;
Feroci, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harshman, K.;
Krimm, H.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Makishima, K.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Murakami, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Starr, R.;
Svinkin, D.
Submitted: 2012-02-03
We present a generalized analytic formalism for the inverse Compton X-ray
emission from hydrogen-poor supernovae and apply this framework to SN2011fe
using Swift-XRT, UVOT and Chandra observations. We characterize the optical
properties of SN2011fe in the Swift bands and find them to be broadly
consistent with a "normal" SN Ia, however, no X-ray source is detected by
either XRT or Chandra. We constrain the progenitor system mass loss rate to be
lower than 2x10^-9 M_sun/yr (3sigma c.l.) for wind velocity v_w=100 km/s. Our
result rules out symbiotic binary progenitors for SN2011fe and argues against
Roche-lobe overflowing subgiants and main sequence secondary stars if >1% of
the transferred mass is lost at the Lagrangian points. Regardless of the
density profile, the X-ray non-detections are suggestive of a clean environment
(particle density < 150 cm-3) for (2x10^15<R<5x10^16) cm around the progenitor
site. This is either consistent with the bulk of material being confined within
the binary system or with a significant delay between mass loss and supernova
explosion. We furthermore combine X-ray and radio limits from Chomiuk et al.
2012 to constrain the post shock energy density in magnetic fields. Finally, we
searched for the shock breakout pulse using gamma-ray observations from the
Interplanetary Network and find no compelling evidence for a
supernova-associated burst. Based on the compact radius of the progenitor star
we estimate that the shock break out pulse was likely not detectable by current
satellites.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.1650 [pdf] - 1026226
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalogs
Hurley, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.
Submitted: 2010-04-09
Between 1996 July and 2002 April, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network detected 787 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were also
detected by the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and/or Wide-Field X-Ray Camera
experiments aboard the BeppoSAX spacecraft. During this period, the network
consisted of up to six spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations
of 475 bursts were obtained. We present the localization data for these events.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0508379 [pdf] - 75268
Mars Odyssey Joins The Third Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Grinkov, V.;
Charyshnikov, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Hamara, D.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2005-08-17
The Mars Odyssey spacecraft carries two experiments which are capable of
detecting cosmic gamma-ray bursts and soft gamma repeaters. Since April 2001
they have detected over 275 bursts and, in conjunction with the other
spacecraft of the interplanetary network, localized many of them rapidly and
precisely enough to allow sensitive multi-wavelength counterpart searches. We
present the Mars Odyssey mission and describe the burst capabilities of the two
experiments in detail. We explain how the spacecraft timing and ephemeris have
been verified in-flight using bursts from objects whose precise positions are
known by other means. Finally, we show several examples of localizations and
discuss future plans for the Odyssey mission and the network as a whole.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208008 [pdf] - 50824
Discovery of GRB 020405 and its Late Red Bump
Price, P. A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. W.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Frail, D. A.;
Galama, T. J.;
Harrison, F. A.;
McCarthy, P.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Sari, R.;
Yost, S. A.;
Jerjen, H.;
Flint, K.;
Phillips, A.;
Warren, B. E.;
Axelrod, T. S.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Holtzman, J.;
Kimble, R. A.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Wheeler, J. C.;
Frontera, F.;
Costa, E.;
Piro, L.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Montanari, E.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Ofek, E.;
Lipkin, Y.
Submitted: 2002-07-31, last modified: 2003-02-19
We present the discovery of GRB 020405 made with the Inter-Planetary Network
(IPN). With a duration of 60 s, the burst appears to be a typical long duration
event. We observed the 75-square acrminute IPN error region with the Mount
Stromlo Observatory's 50-inch robotic telescope and discovered a transient
source which subsequently decayed and was also associated with a variable radio
source. We identify this source as the afterglow of GRB 020405. Subsequent
observations by other groups found varying polarized flux and established a
redshift of 0.690 to the host galaxy. Motivated by the low redshift we
triggered observations with WFPC2 on-board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST).
Modeling the early ground-based data with a jet model, we find a clear red
excess over the decaying optical lightcurves that is present between day 10 and
day 141 (the last HST epoch). This `bump' has the spectral and temporal
features expected of an underlying supernova (SN). In particular, the red color
of the putative SN is similar to that of the SN associated with GRB 011121, at
late time. Restricting the sample of GRBs to those with z<0.7, a total of five
bursts, red bumps at late times are found in GRB 970228, GRB 011121, and GRB
020405. It is possible that the simplest idea, namely that all long duration
GRBs have underlying SNe with a modest dispersion in their properties
(especially peak luminosity), is sufficient to explain the non detections.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0206151 [pdf] - 49782
HETE-2 Localization and Observations of the Short, Hard Gamma-Ray Burst
GRB020531
Lamb, D. Q.;
Ricker, G. R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Hurley, K.;
Kawai, N.;
Shirasaki, Y.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Tamagawa, T.;
Graziani, C.;
Olive, J. -F.;
Yoshida, A.;
Matsuoka, M.;
Torii, K.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Galassi, M.;
Tavenner, T.;
Donaghy, T. Q.;
Boer, M.;
Dezalay, J. -P.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Crew, G.;
Doty, J.;
Monnelly, G.;
Villasenor, J.;
Butler, N.;
Jernigan, J. G.;
Levine, A.;
Martel, F.;
Morgan, E.;
Prigozhin, G.;
Woosley, S. E.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.;
Braga, J.;
Manchanda, R.;
Pizzichini, G.;
Takagishi, K.;
Yamauchi, M.
Submitted: 2002-06-10, last modified: 2002-06-11
The {\it HETE-2} (hereafter \HETE) French Gamma Telescope (FREGATE) and the
Wide-field X-ray Monitor (WXM) instruments detected a short ($t_{50} = 360$
msec in the FREGATE 85-300 keV energy band), hard gamma-ray burst (GRB) that
occurred at 1578.72 SOD (00:26:18.72 UT) on 31 May 2002. The WXM flight
localization software produced a valid location in spacecraft (relative)
coordinates. However, since no on-board real-time star camera aspect was
available, an absolute localization could not be disseminated. A preliminary
localization was reported as a GCN Position Notice at 01:54:22 UT, 88 min after
the burst. Further ground analysis produced a refined localization, which can
be expressed as a 90% confidence rectangle that is 67 arcminutes in RA and 43
arcminutes in Dec (90% confidence region), centered at RA = +15$^{\rm h}$
14$^{\rm m}$ 45$^{\rm s}$, Dec = -19$^\circ$ 21\arcmin 35\arcsec (J2000). An
IPN localization of the burst was disseminated 18 hours after the GRB (Hurley
et al. 2002b). A refined IPN localization was disseminated $\approx$ 5 days
after the burst. This hexagonal-shaped localization error region is centered on
RA = 15$^{\rm h}$ 15$^{\rm m}$ 03.57$^{\rm s}$, -19$^\circ$ 24\arcmin
51.00\arcsec (J2000), and has an area of $\approx$ 22 square arcminutes (99.7%
confidence region). The prompt localization of this short, hard GRB by \HETE
and the anti-Sun pointing of the \HETE instruments, coupled with the refinement
of the localization by the IPN, has made possible rapid follow-up observations
of the burst at radio, optical, and X-ray wavelengths.