Normalized to: Hardy, C.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12509 [pdf] - 2100293
Velocity independent constraints on spin-dependent DM-nucleon
interactions from IceCube and PICO
IceCube Collaboration;
Aartsen, M. G.;
Ackermann, M.;
Adams, J.;
Aguilar, J. A.;
Ahlers, M.;
Ahrens, M.;
Alispach, C.;
Andeen, K.;
Anderson, T.;
Ansseau, I.;
Anton, G.;
Argüelles, C.;
Auffenberg, J.;
Axani, S.;
Backes, P.;
Bagherpour, H.;
Bai, X.;
V., A. Balagopal;
Barbano, A.;
Barwick, S. W.;
Bastian, B.;
Baum, V.;
Baur, S.;
Bay, R.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, K. -H.;
Tjus, J. Becker;
BenZvi, S.;
Berley, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binder, G.;
Bindig, D.;
Blaufuss, E.;
Blot, S.;
Bohm, C.;
Börner, M.;
Böser, S.;
Botner, O.;
Böttcher, J.;
Bourbeau, E.;
Bourbeau, J.;
Bradascio, F.;
Braun, J.;
Bron, S.;
Brostean-Kaiser, J.;
Burgman, A.;
Buscher, J.;
Busse, R. S.;
Carver, T.;
Chen, C.;
Cheung, E.;
Chirkin, D.;
Choi, S.;
Classen, L.;
Coleman, A.;
Collin, G. H.;
Conrad, J. M.;
Coppin, P.;
Correa, P.;
Cowen, D. F.;
Cross, R.;
Dave, P.;
De Clercq, C.;
DeLaunay, J. J.;
Dembinski, H.;
Deoskar, K.;
De Ridder, S.;
Desiati, P.;
de Vries, K. D.;
de Wasseige, G.;
de With, M.;
DeYoung, T.;
Diaz, A.;
Díaz-Vélez, J. C.;
Dujmovic, H.;
Dunkman, M.;
Dvorak, E.;
Eberhardt, B.;
Ehrhardt, T.;
Eller, P.;
Engel, R.;
Evenson, P. A.;
Fahey, S.;
Fazely, A. R.;
Felde, J.;
Filimonov, K.;
Finley, C.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Friedman, E.;
Fritz, A.;
Gaisser, T. K.;
Gallagher, J.;
Ganster, E.;
Garrappa, S.;
Gerhardt, L.;
Ghorbani, K.;
Glauch, T.;
Glüsenkamp, T.;
Goldschmidt, A.;
Gonzalez, J. G.;
Grant, D.;
Griffith, Z.;
Griswold, S.;
Günder, M.;
Gündüz, M.;
Haack, C.;
Hallgren, A.;
Halve, L.;
Halzen, F.;
Hanson, K.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebecker, D.;
Heereman, D.;
Heix, P.;
Helbing, K.;
Hellauer, R.;
Henningsen, F.;
Hickford, S.;
Hignight, J.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hoffman, K. D.;
Hoffmann, R.;
Hoinka, T.;
Hokanson-Fasig, B.;
Hoshina, K.;
Huang, F.;
Huber, M.;
Huber, T.;
Hultqvist, K.;
Hünnefeld, M.;
Hussain, R.;
In, S.;
Iovine, N.;
Ishihara, A.;
Japaridze, G. S.;
Jeong, M.;
Jero, K.;
Jones, B. J. P.;
Jonske, F.;
Joppe, R.;
Kang, D.;
Kang, W.;
Kappes, A.;
Kappesser, D.;
Karg, T.;
Karl, M.;
Karle, A.;
Katz, U.;
Kauer, M.;
Kelley, J. L.;
Kheirandish, A.;
Kim, J.;
Kintscher, T.;
Kiryluk, J.;
Kittler, T.;
Klein, S. R.;
Koirala, R.;
Kolanoski, H.;
Köpke, L.;
Kopper, C.;
Kopper, S.;
Koskinen, D. J.;
Kowalski, M.;
Krings, K.;
Krückl, G.;
Kulacz, N.;
Kurahashi, N.;
Kyriacou, A.;
Labare, M.;
Lanfranchi, J. L.;
Larson, M. J.;
Lauber, F.;
Lazar, J. P.;
Leonard, K.;
Leszczyńska, A.;
Leuermann, M.;
Liu, Q. R.;
Lohfink, E.;
Mariscal, C. J. Lozano;
Lu, L.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Lünemann, J.;
Luszczak, W.;
Lyu, Y.;
Ma, W. Y.;
Madsen, J.;
Maggi, G.;
Mahn, K. B. M.;
Makino, Y.;
Mallik, P.;
Mallot, K.;
Mancina, S.;
Mariş, I. C.;
Maruyama, R.;
Mase, K.;
Maunu, R.;
McNally, F.;
Meagher, K.;
Medici, M.;
Medina, A.;
Meier, M.;
Meighen-Berger, S.;
Menne, T.;
Merino, G.;
Meures, T.;
Micallef, J.;
Mockler, D.;
Momenté, G.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moore, R. W.;
Morse, R.;
Moulai, M.;
Muth, P.;
Nagai, R.;
Naumann, U.;
Neer, G.;
Niederhausen, H.;
Nowicki, S. C.;
Nygren, D. R.;
Pollmann, A. Obertacke;
Oehler, M.;
Olivas, A.;
O'Murchadha, A.;
O'Sullivan, E.;
Palczewski, T.;
Pandya, H.;
Pankova, D. V.;
Park, N.;
Peiffer, P.;
Heros, C. Pérez de los;
Philippen, S.;
Pieloth, D.;
Pinat, E.;
Pizzuto, A.;
Plum, M.;
Porcelli, A.;
Price, P. B.;
Przybylski, G. T.;
Raab, C.;
Raissi, A.;
Rameez, M.;
Rauch, L.;
Rawlins, K.;
Rea, I. C.;
Reimann, R.;
Relethford, B.;
Renschler, M.;
Renzi, G.;
Resconi, E.;
Rhode, W.;
Richman, M.;
Robertson, S.;
Rongen, M.;
Rott, C.;
Ruhe, T.;
Ryckbosch, D.;
Rysewyk, D.;
Safa, I.;
Herrera, S. E. Sanchez;
Sandrock, A.;
Sandroos, J.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Sarkar, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schaufel, M.;
Schieler, H.;
Schlunder, P.;
Schmidt, T.;
Schneider, A.;
Schneider, J.;
Schröder, F. G.;
Schumacher, L.;
Sclafani, S.;
Seckel, D.;
Seunarine, S.;
Shefali, S.;
Silva, M.;
Snihur, R.;
Soedingrekso, J.;
Soldin, D.;
Song, M.;
Spiczak, G. M.;
Spiering, C.;
Stachurska, J.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Stanev, T.;
Stein, R.;
Steinmüller, P.;
Stettner, J.;
Steuer, A.;
Stezelberger, T.;
Stokstad, R. G.;
Stößl, A.;
Strotjohann, N. L.;
Stürwald, T.;
Stuttard, T.;
Sullivan, G. W.;
Taboada, I.;
Tenholt, F.;
Ter-Antonyan, S.;
Terliuk, A.;
Tilav, S.;
Tomankova, L.;
Tönnis, C.;
Toscano, S.;
Tosi, D.;
Trettin, A.;
Tselengidou, M.;
Tung, C. F.;
Turcati, A.;
Turcotte, R.;
Turley, C. F.;
Ty, B.;
Unger, E.;
Elorrieta, M. A. Unland;
Usner, M.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Van Driessche, W.;
van Eijk, D.;
van Eijndhoven, N.;
Vanheule, S.;
van Santen, J.;
Vraeghe, M.;
Walck, C.;
Wallace, A.;
Wallraff, M.;
Wandkowsky, N.;
Watson, T. B.;
Weaver, C.;
Weindl, A.;
Weiss, M. J.;
Weldert, J.;
Wendt, C.;
Werthebach, J.;
Whelan, B. J.;
Whitehorn, N.;
Wiebe, K.;
Wiebusch, C. H.;
Wille, L.;
Williams, D. R.;
Wills, L.;
Wolf, M.;
Wood, J.;
Wood, T. R.;
Woschnagg, K.;
Wrede, G.;
Xu, D. L.;
Xu, X. W.;
Xu, Y.;
Yanez, J. P.;
Yodh, G.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yuan, T.;
Collaboration, M. Zöcklein. PICO;
:;
Amole, C.;
Ardid, M.;
Arnquist, I. J.;
Asner, D. M.;
Baxter, D.;
Behnke, E.;
Bressler, M.;
Broerman, B.;
Cao, G.;
Chen, C. J.;
Chowdhury, U.;
Clark, K.;
Collar, J. I.;
Cooper, P. S.;
Crisler, M.;
Crowder, G.;
Cruz-Venegas, N. A.;
Dahl, C. E.;
Das, M.;
Fallows, S.;
Farine, J.;
Felis, I.;
Filgas, R.;
Girard, F.;
Giroux, G.;
Hall, J.;
Hardy, C.;
Harris, O.;
Hoppe, E. W.;
Jin, M.;
Klopfenstein, L.;
Krauss, C. B.;
Laurin, M.;
Lawson, I.;
Leblanc, A.;
Levine, I.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Mamedov, F.;
Maurya, D.;
Mitra, P.;
Moore, C.;
Nania, T.;
Neilson, R.;
Noble, A. J.;
Oedekerk, P.;
Ortega, A.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, A.;
Podviyanuk, R.;
Priya, S.;
Robinson, A. E.;
Sahoo, S.;
Scallon, O.;
Seth, S.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Starinski, N.;
Štekl, I.;
Sullivan, T.;
Tardif, F.;
Vázquez-Jáuregui, E.;
Walkowski, N.;
Wichoski, U.;
Yan, Y.;
Zacek, V.;
Zhang, J.
Submitted: 2019-07-29, last modified: 2020-05-25
Adopting the Standard Halo Model (SHM) of an isotropic Maxwellian velocity
distribution for dark matter (DM) particles in the Galaxy, the most stringent
current constraints on their spin-dependent scattering cross-section with
nucleons come from the IceCube neutrino observatory and the PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$
superheated bubble chamber experiments. The former is sensitive to high energy
neutrinos from the self-annihilation of DM particles captured in the Sun, while
the latter looks for nuclear recoil events from DM scattering off nucleons.
Although slower DM particles are more likely to be captured by the Sun, the
faster ones are more likely to be detected by PICO. Recent N-body simulations
suggest significant deviations from the SHM for the smooth halo component of
the DM, while observations hint at a dominant fraction of the local DM being in
substructures. We use the method of Ferrer et al. (2015) to exploit the
complementarity between the two approaches and derive conservative constraints
on DM-nucleon scattering. Our results constrain $\sigma_{\mathrm{SD}} \lesssim
3 \times 10^{-39} \mathrm{cm}^2$ (6 $ \times 10^{-38} \mathrm{cm}^2$) at
$\gtrsim 90\%$ C.L. for a DM particle of mass 1~TeV annihilating into $\tau^+
\tau^-$ ($b\bar{b}$) with a local density of $\rho_{\mathrm{DM}} = 0.3~\mathrm{
GeV/cm}^3$. The constraints scale inversely with $\rho_{\mathrm{DM}}$ and are
independent of the DM velocity distribution.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.02213 [pdf] - 2010107
Constraints on the magnetic field within a stratified outer core
Submitted: 2019-12-04
Mounting evidence from both seismology and experiments on core composition
suggests the existence of a layer of stably stratified fluid at the top of
Earth's outer core. In this work we examine the structure of the geomagnetic
field within such a layer, building on the important but little known work of
Malkus (1979). We assume (i) an idealised magnetostrophic spherical model of
the geodynamo neglecting inertia, viscosity and the solid inner core, and (ii)
a strongly stratified layer of constant depth immediately below the outer
boundary within which there is no spherically radial flow. Due to the
restricted dynamics, Malkus showed that the geomagnetic field must obey a
certain condition which is a more restrictive version of the condition of
Taylor (1963). The nonlinear nature of these constraints makes finding a
magnetic field that obeys them, here termed a Malkus state, a challenging task.
Nevertheless, such Malkus states when constrained further by geomagnetic
observations have the potential to probe the interior of the core. By focusing
on a particular class of magnetic fields for which the Malkus constraints are
linear, we describe a constructive method that turns any purely-poloidal field
into an exact Malkus state by adding a suitable toroidal field. We consider
poloidal fields following a prescribed smooth profile within the core that
match observation-derived models of the magnetic field in either epoch 2015 or
the 10000-yr time averaged field. Multiple possible solutions for the toroidal
field exist, hence we determine the Malkus state of miumum toroidal energy and
we find that it has a strong azimuthal toroidal field, larger than the observed
poloidal component at the core-mantle boundary. For the 2015 field for a layer
of depth 300 km, we estimate a root mean squared azimuthal toroidal field of 3
mT with a pointwise maximum of 8 mT occurring at a depth of about 70 km.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12522 [pdf] - 1995410
Data-Driven Modeling of Electron Recoil Nucleation in PICO C$_3$F$_8$
Bubble Chambers
Amole, C.;
Ardid, M.;
Arnquist, I. J.;
Asner, D. M.;
Baxter, D.;
Behnke, E.;
Bressler, M.;
Broerman, B.;
Cao, G.;
Chen, C. J.;
Chen, S.;
Chowdhury, U.;
Clark, K.;
Collar, J. I.;
Cooper, P. S.;
Coutu, C. B.;
Cowles, C.;
Crisler, M.;
Crowder, G.;
Cruz-Venegas, N. A.;
Dahl, C. E.;
Das, M.;
Fallows, S.;
Farine, J.;
Filgas, R.;
Fuentes, J.;
Girard, F.;
Giroux, G.;
Hackett, B.;
Hagen, A.;
Hall, J.;
Hardy, C.;
Harris, O.;
Hillier, T.;
Hoppe, E. W.;
Jackson, C. M.;
Jin, M.;
Klopfenstein, L.;
Kozynets, T.;
Krauss, C. B.;
Laurin, M.;
Lawson, I.;
Leblanc, A.;
Levine, I.;
Licciardi, C.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Loer, B.;
Mamedov, F.;
Mitra, P.;
Moore, C.;
Nania, T.;
Neilson, R.;
Noble, A. J.;
Oedekerk, P.;
Ortega, A.;
Pal, S.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, A.;
Priya, S.;
Robinson, A. E.;
Sahoo, S.;
Scallon, O.;
Seth, S.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Starinski, N.;
Štekl, I.;
Sullivan, T.;
Tardif, F.;
Tiwari, D.;
Vázquez-Jáuregui, E.;
Wagner, J. M.;
Walkowski, N.;
Weima, E.;
Wichoski, U.;
Wierman, K.;
Woodley, W.;
Yan, Y.;
Zacek, V.;
Zhang, J.
Submitted: 2019-05-29, last modified: 2019-11-06
The primary advantage of moderately superheated bubble chamber detectors is
their simultaneous sensitivity to nuclear recoils from WIMP dark matter and
insensitivity to electron recoil backgrounds. A comprehensive analysis of PICO
gamma calibration data demonstrates for the first time that electron recoils in
C$_3$F$_8$ scale in accordance with a new nucleation mechanism, rather than one
driven by a hot-spike as previously supposed. Using this semi-empirical model,
bubble chamber nucleation thresholds may be tuned to be sensitive to lower
energy nuclear recoils while maintaining excellent electron recoil rejection.
The PICO-40L detector will exploit this model to achieve thermodynamic
thresholds as low as 2.8 keV while being dominated by single-scatter events
from coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering of solar neutrinos. In one
year of operation, PICO-40L can improve existing leading limits from PICO on
spin-dependent WIMP-proton coupling by nearly an order of magnitude for WIMP
masses greater than 3 GeV c$^{-2}$ and will have the ability to surpass all
existing non-xenon bounds on spin-independent WIMP-nucleon coupling for WIMP
masses from 3 to 40 GeV c$^{-2}$.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.04031 [pdf] - 1916812
Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO-60
C$_3$F$_8$ Bubble Chamber
Amole, C.;
Ardid, M.;
Arnquist, I. J.;
Asner, D. M.;
Baxter, D.;
Behnke, E.;
Bressler, M.;
Broerman, B.;
Cao, G.;
Chen, C. J.;
Chowdhury, U.;
Clark, K.;
Collar, J. I.;
Cooper, P. S.;
Coutu, C. B.;
Cowles, C.;
Crisler, M.;
Crowder, G.;
Cruz-Venegas, N. A.;
Dahl, C. E.;
Das, M.;
Fallows, S.;
Farine, J.;
Felis, I.;
Filgas, R.;
Girard, F.;
Giroux, G.;
Hall, J.;
Hardy, C.;
Harris, O.;
Hillier, T.;
Hoppe, E. W.;
Jackson, C. M.;
Jin, M.;
Klopfenstein, L.;
Krauss, C. B.;
Laurin, M.;
Lawson, I.;
Leblanc, A.;
Levine, I.;
Licciardi, C.;
Lippincott, W. H.;
Loer, B.;
Mamedov, F.;
Mitra, P.;
Moore, C.;
Nania, T.;
Neilson, R.;
Noble, A. J.;
Oedekerk, P.;
Ortega, A.;
Piro, M. -C.;
Plante, A.;
Podviyanuk, R.;
Priya, S.;
Robinson, A. E.;
Sahoo, S.;
Scallon, O.;
Seth, S.;
Sonnenschein, A.;
Starinski, N.;
Štekl, I.;
Sullivan, T.;
Tardif, F.;
Vázquez-Jáuregui, E.;
Walkowski, N.;
Weima, E.;
Wichoski, U.;
Wierman, K.;
Yan, Y.;
Zacek, V.;
Zhang, J.
Submitted: 2019-02-11
Final results are reported from operation of the PICO-60 C$_3$F$_8$ dark
matter detector, a bubble chamber filled with 52 kg of C$_3$F$_8$ located in
the SNOLAB underground laboratory. The chamber was operated at thermodynamic
thresholds as low as 1.2 keV without loss of stability. A new blind 1404-kg-day
exposure at 2.45 keV threshold was acquired with approximately the same
expected total background rate as the previous 1167-kg-day exposure at 3.3 keV.
This increased exposure is enabled in part by a new optical tracking analysis
to better identify events near detector walls, permitting a larger fiducial
volume. These results set the most stringent direct-detection constraint to
date on the WIMP-proton spin-dependent cross section at 2.5 $\times$ 10$^{-41}$
cm$^2$ for a 25 GeV WIMP, and improve on previous PICO results for 3-5 GeV
WIMPs by an order of magnitude.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.06612 [pdf] - 1762973
Three-dimensional solutions for the geostrophic flow in the Earth's core
Submitted: 2018-06-18
In his seminal work, Taylor (1963) argued that the geophysically relevant
limit for dynamo action within the outer core is one of negligibly small
inertia and viscosity in the magnetohydrodynamic equations. Within this limit,
he showed the existence of a necessary condition, now well known as Taylor's
constraint, which requires that the cylindrically-averaged Lorentz torque must
everywhere vanish; magnetic fields that satisfy this condition are termed
Taylor states. Taylor further showed that the requirement of this constraint
being continuously satisfied through time prescribes the evolution of the
geostrophic flow, the cylindrically-averaged azimuthal flow. We show that
Taylor's original prescription for the geostrophic flow, as satisfying a given
second order ordinary differential equation, is only valid for a small subset
of Taylor states. An incomplete treatment of the boundary conditions renders
his equation generally incorrect. Here, by taking proper account of the
boundaries, we describe a generalisation of Taylor's method that enables
correct evaluation of the instantaneous geostrophic flow for any 3D Taylor
state. We present the first full-sphere examples of geostrophic flows driven by
non-axisymmetric Taylor states. Although in axisymmetry the geostrophic flow
admits a mild logarithmic singularity on the rotation axis, in the fully 3D
case we show that this is absent and indeed the geostrophic flow appears to be
everywhere regular.