Normalized to: Hamburg, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07251 [pdf] - 2113441
Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long $\gamma$-ray burst
Acciari, V. A.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Engels, A. Arbet;
Baack, D.;
Babić, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bellizzi, L.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Besenrieder, J.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bošnjak, Ž.;
Busetto, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Ceribella, G.;
Chai, Y.;
Chilingaryan, A.;
Cikota, S.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, U.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Depaoli, D.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Espiñeira, E. Do Souto;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donini, A.;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fattorini, A.;
Ferrara, G.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Foffano, L.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Fukami, S.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gasparyan, S.;
Gaug, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Godinović, N.;
Green, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Herrera, J.;
Hoang, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hütten, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inoue, S.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jouvin, L.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Lamastra, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Leone, F.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
López-Oramas, A.;
Loporchio, S.;
Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Mićanović, S.;
Miceli, D.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Molina, E.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende, D.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Neustroev, V.;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Nozaki, S.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Peñil, P.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saha, L.;
Sahakyan, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sakurai, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Šnidarić, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Somero, A.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strom, D.;
Strzys, M.;
Suda, Y.;
Surić, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Albà, N.;
Tosti, L.;
Vagelli, V.;
van Scherpenberg, J.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Vigorito, C. F.;
Vitale, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Will, M.;
Zarić, D.;
Nava, L.;
Veres, P.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Arimoto, M.;
Tak, D.;
Asano, K.;
Axelsson, M.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Gill, R.;
Granot, J.;
McEnery, J.;
Razzaque, S.;
Piron, F.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Campana, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
O'Brien, P.;
Capalbi, M.;
D'Aì, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Starling, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
Ursi, A.;
Tavani, M.;
Cardillo, M.;
Casentini, C.;
Piano, G.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Pittori, C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Parmiggiani, N.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Anderson, J. P.;
Bernardi, G.;
Bolmer, J.;
Caballero-García, M. D.;
Carrasco, I. M.;
Castellón, A.;
Segura, N. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Cherukuri, S. V.;
Cockeram, A. M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Di Dato, A.;
Diretse, R.;
Fender, R. P.;
Fernández-García, E.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Greiner, J.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Heywood, I.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Jaiswal, V.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Japelj, J.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Klose, S.;
Levan, A. J.;
Li, X. Y.;
Lotti, S.;
Maguire, K.;
Malesani, D. B.;
Manulis, I.;
Marongiu, M.;
Martin, S.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Misra, K.;
Moin, A.;
Mooley, K. P.;
Nasri, S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Noschese, A.;
Novara, G.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Peretti, E.;
del Pulgar, C. J. Pérez;
Pérez-Torres, M. A.;
Perley, D. A.;
Piro, L.;
Ragosta, F.;
Resmi, L.;
Ricci, R.;
Rossi, A.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, R.;
Selsing, J.;
Schulze, S.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, I. A.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Stevens, J.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Thóne, C. C.;
Tiengo, A.;
Tremou, E.;
Troja, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Vergani, S. D.;
Wieringa, M.;
Woudt, P. A.;
Xu, D.;
Yaron, O.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from ultra-relativistic jets
launched from the collapsing cores of dying massive stars. They are
characterised by an initial phase of bright and highly variable radiation in
the keV-MeV band that is likely produced within the jet and lasts from
milliseconds to minutes, known as the prompt emission. Subsequently, the
interaction of the jet with the external medium generates external shock waves,
responsible for the afterglow emission, which lasts from days to months, and
occurs over a broad energy range, from the radio to the GeV bands. The
afterglow emission is generally well explained as synchrotron radiation by
electrons accelerated at the external shock. Recently, an intense, long-lasting
emission between 0.2 and 1 TeV was observed from the GRB 190114C. Here we
present the results of our multi-frequency observational campaign of
GRB~190114C, and study the evolution in time of the GRB emission across 17
orders of magnitude in energy, from $5\times10^{-6}$ up to $10^{12}$\,eV. We
find that the broadband spectral energy distribution is double-peaked, with the
TeV emission constituting a distinct spectral component that has power
comparable to the synchrotron component. This component is associated with the
afterglow, and is satisfactorily explained by inverse Compton upscattering of
synchrotron photons by high-energy electrons. We find that the conditions
required to account for the observed TeV component are not atypical, supporting
the possibility that inverse Compton emission is commonly produced in GRBs.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.03006 [pdf] - 2105547
Evaluation of Automated Fermi GBM Localizations of Gamma-ray Bursts
Goldstein, Adam;
Fletcher, Corinne;
Veres, Peter;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Cleveland, William H.;
Gibby, Melissa H.;
Hui, C. Michelle;
Bissaldi, Elisabetta;
Burns, Eric;
Hamburg, Rachel;
von Kienlin, Andreas;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Malacaria, Christian;
Paciesas, William S.;
Roberts, Oliver J.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2019-09-06, last modified: 2020-04-19
The capability of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) to localize
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is evaluated for two different automated algorithms:
the GBM Team's RoboBA algorithm and the independently developed BALROG
algorithm. Through a systematic study utilizing over 500 GRBs with known
locations from instruments like Swift and the Fermi LAT, we directly compare
the effectiveness of, and accurately estimate the systematic uncertainty for,
both algorithms. We show simple adjustments to the GBM Team's RoboBA, in
operation since early 2016, yields significant improvement in the systematic
uncertainty, removing the long tail identified in the systematic, and improves
the overall accuracy. The systematic uncertainty for the updated RoboBA
localizations is $1.8^\circ$ for 52% of GRBs and $4.1^\circ$ for the remaining
48%. Both from public reporting by BALROG and our systematic study, we find the
systematic uncertainty of $1-2^\circ$ quoted in GCN circulars for bright GRBs
localized by BALROG is an underestimate of the true magnitude of the
systematic, which we find to be $2.7^\circ$ for 74% of GRBs and $33^\circ$ for
the remaining 26%. We show that, once the systematic uncertainty is considered,
the RoboBA 90% localization confidence regions can be more than an order of
magnitude smaller in area than those produced by BALROG.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.11460 [pdf] - 2078735
The Fourth Fermi-GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: A Decade of Data
von Kienlin, A.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burns, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Kocevski, D.;
Mailyan, B.;
Malacaria, C.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Veres, P.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2020-02-26, last modified: 2020-04-14
We present the fourth in a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
observed with Fermi's Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM). It extends the six
year catalog by four more years, now covering the ten year time period from
trigger enabling on 2008 July 12 to 2018 July 11. During this time period GBM
triggered almost twice a day on transient events of which we identifyied 2356
as cosmic GRBs. Additional trigger events were due to solar are events,
magnetar burst activities, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes. The intention of
the GBM GRB catalog series is to provide updated information to the community
on the most important observables of the GBM-detected GRBs. For each GRB the
location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak
flux, and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the
50-300 keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the
instrument reference system is observed and also for a broader energy band from
10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy detectors.
Furthermore, information is given on the settings of the triggering criteria
and exceptional operational conditions during years 7 to 10 in the mission.
This fourth catalog is an official product of the Fermi-GBM science team, and
the data files containing the complete results are available from the
High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.01462 [pdf] - 2023721
Search for Advanced LIGO Single Interferometer Compact Binary
Coalescence Signals in Coincidence with Gamma-Ray Events in Fermi-GBM
Stachie, C.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Burns, E.;
Christensen, N.;
Hamburg, R.;
Briggs, M.;
Broida, J.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hayes, F.;
Littenberg, T.;
Shawhan, P.;
Veitch, J.;
Veres, P.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2020-01-06
Presented is the description of a new and general method used to search for
$\gamma$-ray counterparts to gravitational-wave (GW) triggers. This method is
specifically applied to single GW detector triggers. Advanced LIGO data from
observing runs O1 and O2 were analyzed, thus each GW trigger comes from either
the LIGO-Livingston or the LIGO-Hanford interferometer. For each GW trigger,
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data is searched and the most significant
subthreshold signal counterpart is selected. Then, a methodology is defined in
order to establish which of GW-$\gamma$-ray pairs are likely to have a common
origin. For that purpose an association ranking statistic is calculated from
which a false alarm rate is derived. The events with the highest ranking
statistics are selected for further analysis consisting of LIGO detector
characterization and parameter estimation. The $\gamma$-ray signal
characteristics are also evaluated. We find no significant candidates from the
search.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.12597 [pdf] - 1989056
Updates to the Fermi GBM Targeted Sub-threshold Search in Preparation
for the Third Observing Run of LIGO/Virgo
Goldstein, Adam;
Hamburg, Rachel;
Wood, Joshua;
Hui, C. Michelle;
Cleveland, William H.;
Kocevski, Daniel;
Littenberg, Tyson;
Burns, Eric;
Canton, Tito Dal;
Veres, Peter;
Mailyan, Bagrat;
Malacaria, Christian;
Briggs, Michael S.;
Wilson-Hodge, Colleen A.
Submitted: 2019-03-29, last modified: 2019-10-30
In this document, we detail the improvements made to the Fermi GBM targeted
sub-threshold search for counterparts to LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave
triggers. We describe the implemented changes and compare the sensitivity of
the O3 search to that of the version of the search that operated during O2.
Overall, we have improved both the sensitivity and speed of the targeted
search. Further improvements to the search have been made for the O3b observing
run, including automated upperlimits estimation and incorporating the updated
localization systematic with the new version of the search.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1901.06158 [pdf] - 1878715
Fermi GBM GRBs with characteristics similar to GRB 170817A
von Kienlin, A.;
Veres, P.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hamburg, R.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Preece, R. D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Malacaria, C.
Submitted: 2019-01-18, last modified: 2019-04-18
We present a search for gamma-ray bursts in the Fermi-GBM 10 year catalog
that show similar characteristics to GRB 170817A, the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a GRB identified as a binary neutron star (BNS) merger via
gravitational wave observations. Our search is focused on a non-thermal pulse,
followed by a thermal component, as observed for GRB 170817A. We employ search
methods based on the measured catalog parameters and Bayesian Block analysis.
Our multi-pronged approach, which includes examination of the localization and
spectral properties of the thermal component, yields a total of 13 candidates,
including GRB 170817A and the previously reported similar burst, GRB 150101B.
The similarity of the candidates is likely caused by the same processes that
shaped the gamma-ray signal of GRB 170817A, thus providing evidence of a nearby
sample of short GRBs resulting from BNS merger events. Some of the newly
identfied counterparts were observed by other space telescopes and ground
observatories, but none of them have a measured redshift. We present an
analysis of this sub-sample, and we discuss two models. From uncovering 13
candidates during a time period of ten years we predict that Fermi-GBM will
trigger on-board on about one burst similar to GRB 170817A per year.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1807.02866 [pdf] - 1740032
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a
Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Burns, E.;
Veres, P.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Christensen, N.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
McEnery, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Hui, C. M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mailyan, B.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Siellez, K.;
Stanbro, M.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2018-07-08, last modified: 2018-08-06
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star
merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as
GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the
closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of
a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent
two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A.
While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short
gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is
not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis
version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest
short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally
undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify
nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding
the search for kilonovae.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.02378 [pdf] - 1727875
Analysis of Sub-threshold Short Gamma-ray Bursts in Fermi GBM Data
Kocevski, D.;
Burns, E.;
Goldstein, A.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Briggs, M. S.;
Blackburn, L.;
Veres, P.;
Hui, C. M.;
Hamburg, R.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Littenberg, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.
Submitted: 2018-06-06, last modified: 2018-08-05
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is currently the most prolific
detector of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). Recently the detection rate of short GRBs
(SGRBs) has been dramatically increased through the use of ground-based
searches that analyze GBM continuous time tagged event (CTTE) data. Here we
examine the efficiency of a method developed to search CTTE data for
sub-threshold transient events in temporal coincidence with LIGO/Virgo compact
binary coalescence triggers. This targeted search operates by coherently
combining data from all 14 GBM detectors by taking into account the complex
spatial and energy dependent response of each detector. We use the method to
examine a sample of SGRBs that were independently detected by the Burst Alert
Telescope on board the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, but which were too
intrinsically weak or viewed with unfavorable instrument geometry to initiate
an on-board trigger of GBM. We find that the search can successfully recover a
majority of the BAT detected sample in the CTTE data. We show that the targeted
search of CTTE data will be crucial in increasing the GBM sensitivity, and
hence the gamma-ray horizon, to weak events such as GRB 170817A. We also
examine the properties of the GBM signal possibly associated with the LIGO
detection of GW150914 and show that it is consistent with the observed
properties of other sub-threshold SGRBs in our sample. We find that the
targeted search is capable of recovering true astrophysical signals as weak as
the signal associated with GW150914 in the untriggered data.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1802.07328 [pdf] - 1638848
Gamma-ray burst models in light of the GRB 170817A - GW170817 connection
Veres, P.;
Mészáros, P.;
Goldstein, A.;
Fraija, N.;
Connaughton, V.;
Burns, E.;
Preece, R. D.;
Hamburg, R.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kocevski, D.
Submitted: 2018-02-20
For the first time, a short gamma-ray burst (GRB) was unambiguously
associated with a gravitational wave (GW) observation from a binary neutron
star (NS) merger. This allows us to link the details of the central engine
properties to GRB emission models. We find that photospheric models (both
dissipative and non-dissipative variants) have difficulties accounting for the
observations. Internal shocks give the most natural account of the observed
peak energy, viewing angle and total energy. We also show that a simple
external shock model can reproduce the observed GRB pulse with parameters
consistent with those derived from the afterglow modeling. We find a simple
cocoon shock breakout model is in mild tension with the observed spectral
evolution, however it cannot be excluded based on gamma-ray data alone. Future
joint observations of brighter GRBs will pose even tighter constraints on
prompt emission models.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05446 [pdf] - 1589764
An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications:
Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A
Goldstein, A.;
Veres, P.;
Burns, E.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Hamburg, R.;
Kocevski, D.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Preece, R. D.;
Poolakkil, S.;
Roberts, O. J.;
Hui, C. M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Racusin, J.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Christensen, N.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Siellez, K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Broida, J.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Gibby, M. H.;
Giles, M. M.;
Kippen, R. M.;
McBreen, S.;
McEnery, J.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Paciesas, W. S.;
Stanbro, M.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately
1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated
with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of
gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical
source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We
report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which
extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary
compact mergers.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02395 [pdf] - 1529667
Updates to the Fermi-GBM Short GRB Targeted Offline Search in
Preparation for LIGO's Second Observing Run
Submitted: 2016-12-07
We detail the improvements made to the targeted offline search of Fermi-GBM
data for coincident signals to LIGO gravitational wave triggers. Description of
the changes are included, as well as comparisons between the ranking statistics
and False Alarm Rate distributions for the search during LIGO O1 and O2.
