Normalized to: Hadamcik, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1905.12508 [pdf] - 1971254
Interpretation through experimental simulations of phase functions
revealed by Rosetta in 67P dust coma
Submitted: 2019-05-29, last modified: 2019-07-09
Context: The dust-brightness phase curves that have been measured by the
OSIRIS cameras on board the Rosetta spacecraft within the coma of comet
67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P) present a remarkable u-shape. Aims: Our goal is
to compare these phase curves with those of tentatively analog dust samples to
assess the key dust properties that might induce this shape. Methods:
Light-scattering measurements have been made with the PROGRA2 instrument in the
laboratory and in microgravity conditions on samples of different physical
properties and compositions that are likely to be representative of cometary
dust particles. Results: We find that the brightness phase curves of a series
of interplanetary dust analogs that have been recently developed (to fit the
polarimetric properties of the inner zodiacal cloud and their changes with
heliocentric distance) are quite comparable to those of 67P. Key dust
properties seem to be related to the composition and the porosity. Conclusions:
We conclude that the shape of the brightness phase curves of 67P has to be
related to the presence of a significant amount of organic compounds (at least
50% in mass) and of fluffy aggregates (of a size range of 10 to 200 microns).
We also confirm similarities between the dust particles of this Jupiter-family
comet and the particles within the inner zodiacal cloud.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.10539 [pdf] - 1584026
The 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko observation campaign in support of the
Rosetta mission
Snodgrass, C.;
A'Hearn, M. F.;
Aceituno, F.;
Afanasiev, V.;
Bagnulo, S.;
Bauer, J.;
Bergond, G.;
Besse, S.;
Biver, N.;
Bodewits, D.;
Boehnhardt, H.;
Bonev, B. P.;
Borisov, G.;
Carry, B.;
Casanova, V.;
Cochran, A.;
Conn, B. C.;
Davidsson, B.;
Davies, J. K.;
de León, J.;
de Mooij, E.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Delacruz, M.;
DiSanti, M. A.;
Drew, J. E.;
Duffard, R.;
Edberg, N. J. T.;
Faggi, S.;
Feaga, L.;
Fitzsimmons, A.;
Fujiwara, H.;
Gibb, E. L.;
Gillon, M.;
Green, S. F.;
Guijarro, A.;
Guilbert-Lepoutre, A.;
Gutiérrez, P. J.;
Hadamcik, E.;
Hainaut, O.;
Haque, S.;
Hedrosa, R.;
Hines, D.;
Hopp, U.;
Hoyo, F.;
Hutsemékers, D.;
Hyland, M.;
Ivanova, O.;
Jehin, E.;
Jones, G. H.;
Keane, J. V.;
Kelley, M. S. P.;
Kiselev, N.;
Kleyna, J.;
Kluge, M.;
Knight, M. M.;
Kokotanekova, R.;
Koschny, D.;
Kramer, E.;
López-Moreno, J. J.;
Lacerda, P.;
Lara, L. M.;
Lasue, J.;
Lehto, H. J.;
Levasseur-Regourd, A. C.;
Licandro, J.;
Lin, Z. Y.;
Lister, T.;
Lowry, S. C.;
Mainzer, A.;
Manfroid, J.;
Marchant, J.;
McKay, A. J.;
McNeill, A.;
Meech, K. J.;
Micheli, M.;
Mohammed, I.;
Monguió, M.;
Moreno, F.;
Muñoz, O.;
Mumma, M. J.;
Nikolov, P.;
Opitom, C.;
Ortiz, J. L.;
Paganini, L.;
Pajuelo, M.;
Pozuelos, F. J.;
Protopapa, S.;
Pursimo, T.;
Rajkumar, B.;
Ramanjooloo, Y.;
Ramos, E.;
Ries, C.;
Riffeser, A.;
Rosenbush, V.;
Rousselot, P.;
Ryan, E. L.;
Santos-Sanz, P.;
Schleicher, D. G.;
Schmidt, M.;
Schulz, R.;
Sen, A. K.;
Somero, A.;
Sota, A.;
Stinson, A.;
Sunshine, J.;
Thompson, A.;
Tozzi, G. P.;
Tubiana, C.;
Villanueva, G. L.;
Wang, X.;
Wooden, D. H.;
Yagi, M.;
Yang, B.;
Zaprudin, B.;
Zegmott, T. J.
Submitted: 2017-05-30
We present a summary of the campaign of remote observations that supported
the European Space Agency's Rosetta mission. Telescopes across the globe (and
in space) followed comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from before Rosetta's
arrival until nearly the end of mission in September 2016. These provided
essential data for mission planning, large-scale context information for the
coma and tails beyond the spacecraft, and a way to directly compare 67P with
other comets. The observations revealed 67P to be a relatively `well behaved'
comet, typical of Jupiter family comets and with activity patterns that repeat
from orbit-to-orbit. Comparison between this large collection of telescopic
observations and the in situ results from Rosetta will allow us to better
understand comet coma chemistry and structure. This work is just beginning as
the mission ends -- in this paper we present a summary of the ground-based
observations and early results, and point to many questions that will be
addressed in future studies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1507.00761 [pdf] - 1259127
The Composition of Comets
Cochran, Anita L.;
Levasseur-Regourd, Anny-Chantal;
Cordiner, Martin;
Hadamcik, Edith;
Lasue, Jeremie;
Gicquel, Adeline;
Schleicher, David G.;
Charnley, Steven B.;
Mumma, Michael J.;
Paganini, Lucas;
Bockelee-Morvan, Dominique;
Biver, Nicolas;
Kuan, Yi-Jehng
Submitted: 2015-07-02
This paper is the result of the International Cometary Workshop, held in
Toulouse, France in April 2014, where the participants came together to assess
our knowledge of comets prior to the ESA Rosetta Mission. In this paper, we
look at the composition of the gas and dust from the comae of comets. With the
gas, we cover the various taxonomic studies that have broken comets into groups
and compare what is seen at all wavelengths. We also discuss what has been
learned from mass spectrometers during flybys. A few caveats for our
interpretation are discussed. With dust, much of our information comes from
flybys. They include {\it in situ} analyses as well as samples returned to
Earth for laboratory measurements. Remote sensing IR observations and
polarimetry are also discussed. For both gas and dust, we discuss what
instruments the Rosetta spacecraft and Philae lander will bring to bear to
improve our understanding of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko as "ground-truth"
for our previous comprehensive studies. Finally, we summarize some of the
initial Rosetta Mission findings.