Normalized to: Høg, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.07325 [pdf] - 2099691
GaiaNIR: Combining optical and Near-Infra-Red (NIR) capabilities with
Time-Delay-Integration (TDI) sensors for a future Gaia-like mission
Hobbs, David;
Høg, Erik;
Mora, Alcione;
Crowley, Cian;
McMillan, Paul;
Ranalli, Piero;
Heiter, Ulrike;
Jordi, Carme;
Hambly, Nigel;
Church, Ross;
Anthony, Brown;
Tanga, Paolo;
Chemin, Laurent;
Portell, Jordi;
Jiménez-Esteban, Fran;
Klioner, Sergei;
Mignard, Francois;
Fynbo, Johan;
Wyrzykowski, Łukasz;
Rybicki, Krzysztof;
Anderson, Richard I.;
Cellino, Alberto;
Fabricius, Claus;
Davidson, Michael;
Lindegren, Lennart
Submitted: 2016-09-23, last modified: 2020-05-22
ESA recently called for new "Science Ideas" to be investigated in terms of
feasibility and technological developments -- for technologies not yet
sufficiently mature. These ideas may in the future become candidates for M or L
class missions within the ESA Science Program.
With the launch of Gaia in December 2013, Europe entered a new era of space
astrometry following in the footsteps of the very successful Hipparcos mission
from the early 1990s. Gaia is the successor to Hipparcos, both of which
operated in optical wavelengths, and Gaia is two orders of magnitude more
accurate in the five astrometric parameters and is surveying four orders of
magnitude more stars in a vast volume of the Milky Way. The combination of the
Hipparcos/Tycho-2 catalogues with the first early Gaia data release will give
improved proper motions over a long ~25 year baseline. The final Gaia solution
will also establish a new optical reference frame by means of quasars, by
linking the optical counterparts of radio (VLBI) sources defining the
orientation of the reference frame, and by using the zero proper motion of
quasars to determine a non-rotating frame.
A weakness of Gaia is that it only operates at optical wavelengths. However,
much of the Galactic centre and the spiral arm regions, important for certain
studies, are obscured by interstellar extinction and this makes it difficult
for Gaia to deeply probe. Traditionally, this problem is overcome by switching
to the infra-red but this was not possible with Gaia's CCDs. Additionally, to
scan the entire sky and make global absolute parallax measurements the
spacecraft must have a constant rotation and this requires that the CCDs
operate in TDI mode, increasing their complexity.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.01020 [pdf] - 2065138
Astrometric accuracy during the past 2000 years
Submitted: 2017-07-04, last modified: 2020-03-16
The great development of astrometric accuracy since the observations by
Hipparchus about 150 BC was documented in 2008 in the first version of the
present report. This report was updated in H{\o}g (2017d), e.g. with recent
information on the catalogues before 1800 AD. The development has often been
displayed in diagrams showing the accuracy versus time. A new simplified
diagram is provided in the present report as Fig.2 and in a .png file and this
information will presumably be the main interest for some readers.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.12535 [pdf] - 1924376
Voyage 2050 White Paper: All-Sky Visible and Near Infrared Space
Astrometry
Hobbs, David;
Brown, Anthony;
Høg, Erik;
Jordi, Carme;
Kawata, Daisuke;
Tanga, Paolo;
Klioner, Sergei;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Wyrzykowski, Łukasz;
Walton, Nic;
Vallenari, Antonella;
Makarov, Valeri;
Rybizki, Jan;
Jiménez-Esteban, Fran;
Caballero, José A.;
McMillan, Paul J.;
Secrest, Nathan;
Mor, Roger;
Andrews, Jeff J.;
Zwitter, Tomaž;
Chiappini, Cristina;
Fynbo, Johan P. U.;
Ting, Yuan-Sen;
Hestroffer, Daniel;
Lindegren, Lennart;
McArthur, Barbara;
Gouda, Naoteru;
Moore, Anna;
Gonzalez, Oscar A.;
Vaccari, Mattia
Submitted: 2019-07-26
A new all-sky visible and Near-InfraRed (NIR) space astrometry mission with a
wavelength cutoff in the K-band is not just focused on a single or small number
of key science cases. Instead, it is extremely broad, answering key science
questions in nearly every branch of astronomy while also providing a dense and
accurate visible-NIR reference frame needed for future astronomy facilities.
For almost 2 billion common stars the combination of Gaia and a new all-sky NIR
astrometry mission would provide much improved proper motions, answering key
science questions -- from the solar system and stellar systems, including
exoplanet systems, to compact galaxies, quasars, neutron stars, binaries and
dark matter substructures. The addition of NIR will result in up to 8 billion
newly measured stars in some of the most obscured parts of our Galaxy, and
crucially reveal the very heart of the Galactic bulge region. In this white
paper we argue that rather than improving on the accuracy, a greater overall
science return can be achieved by going deeper than Gaia and by expanding the
wavelength range to the NIR.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.05191 [pdf] - 1914761
Astro2020 Activity, Project of State of the Profession Consideration
(APC) White Paper: All-Sky Near Infrared Space Astrometry. State of the
Profession Considerations: Development of Scanning NIR Detectors for
Astronomy
Hobbs, David;
Leitz, Christopher;
Bartlett, Jo;
Hepburn, Ian;
Kawata, Daisuke;
Cropper, Mark;
Mazin, Ben;
Brown, Anthony;
Makarov, Valeri;
McArthur, Barbara;
Moore, Anna;
Sharp, Robert;
Gilbert, James;
Høg, Erik
Submitted: 2019-07-11
Gaia is a revolutionary space mission developed by ESA and is delivering 5
parameter astrometry, photometry and radial velocities over the whole sky with
astrometric accuracies down to a few tens of micro-arcseconds. A weakness of
Gaia is that it only operates at optical wavelengths. However, much of the
Galactic centre and the spiral arm regions, important for certain studies, are
obscured by interstellar extinction and this makes it difficult for Gaia to
deeply probe. This problem can be overcome by switching to the Near Infra-Red
(NIR) but this is not possible with silicon CCDs. Additionally, to scan the
entire sky and make global absolute parallax measurements the spacecraft must
have a constant rotation and this requires the detectors operate in Time
Delayed Integration (TDI) mode or similar.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.08836 [pdf] - 1869907
All-Sky Near Infrared Space Astrometry
McArthur, Barbara;
Hobbs, David;
Høg, Erik;
Makarov, Valeri;
Sozzetti, Alessandro;
Brown, Anthony;
Martins, Alberto Krone;
Bartlett, Jennifer Lynn;
Tomsick, John;
Shao, Mike;
Benedict, Fritz;
Bendek, Eduardo;
Boehm, Celine;
Conroy, Charlie;
Fynbo, Johan Peter Uldall;
Gnedin, Oleg;
Hillenbrand, Lynne;
Lindegren, Lennart;
Rodriguez, David R.;
White, Rick;
Turyshev, Slava;
Unwin, Stephen;
Zhai, ChengXing
Submitted: 2019-04-18
Gaia is currently revolutionizing modern astronomy. However, much of the
Galactic plane, center and the spiral arm regions are obscured by interstellar
extinction, rendering them inaccessible because Gaia is an optical instrument.
An all-sky near infrared (NIR) space observatory operating in the optical NIR,
separated in time from the original Gaia would provide microarcsecond NIR
astrometry and millimag photometry to penetrate obscured regions unraveling the
internal dynamics of the Galaxy.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.03394 [pdf] - 1721105
Unidentified quasars among stationary objects from Gaia DR2
Submitted: 2018-05-09
We here apply a novel technique selecting quasar candidates purely as sources
with zero proper motions in the Gaia data release 2 (DR2). We demonstrate that
this approach is highly efficient toward high Galactic latitudes with < 25%
contamination from stellar sources. Such a selection technique offers a very
pure sample completeness, since all cosmological point sources are selected
regardless of their intrinsic spectral properties within the limiting magnitude
of Gaia. We carry out a pilot-study by defining a sample compiled by including
all Gaia-DR2 sources within one degree of the North Galactic Pole (NGP)
selected to have proper motions consistent with zero within 2-sigma
uncertainty. By cross-matching the sample to the optical Sloan Digital Sky
Survey (SDSS) and the mid-infrared AllWISE photometric catalogues we
investigate the colours of each of our sources. Together with already
spectroscopically confirmed quasars we are therefore able to determine the
efficiency of our selection. The majority of the zero proper motion sources
have optical to mid-infrared colours consistent with known quasars. The
remaining population may be contaminating stellar sources, but some may also be
quasars with colours similar to stars. Spectroscopic follow-up of the zero
proper motion sources is needed to unveil such a hitherto hidden quasar
population. This approach has the potential to allow substantial progress on
many important questions concerning quasars such as determining the fraction of
dust-obscured quasars, the fraction of broad absorption line (BAL) quasars, and
the metallicity distribution of damped Lyman-$\alpha$ absorbers. The technique
could also potentially reveal new types of quasars or even new classes of
cosmological point sources.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.10881 [pdf] - 1674001
Astrometry history: Hipparcos from 1964 to 1980
Submitted: 2018-04-29
Here follow three reports covering different aspects of the early history
from 1964 to 1980 of the Hipparcos satellite mission. The first report
"Interviews about the creation of Hipparcos" contains interviews from 2017 with
scientists about how the mission was conceived up to the begin of technical
development. The second report "From TYCHO to Hipparcos 1975 to 1979" is about
the Hipparcos development based on new material from my archive. From my 65
years dedicated to the development of astrometry, I argue that very special
historical circumstances in Europe were decisive for the idea of space
astrometry to become reality: Hipparcos did not just come because
astrophysicists needed the data. The third report "Miraculous 1980 for
Hipparcos" documents how the approval of the astrometric mission in January
1980 in competition with an astrophysical mission was only achieved with very
great difficulty, even after an outstanding astrophysicist had presented
overwhelming arguments that the astrometric mission would be scientifically
much more important.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.3302 [pdf] - 1579553
Solar system and small-field astrometry
Submitted: 2014-08-14, last modified: 2017-08-03
Astrometric issues for solar system studies are discussed. An overview gives
references and cover all aspects of the solar system where astrometry is
important: orbits of planets, moons, asteroids and NEOs, masses of asteroids,
occultations of asteroids and KBOs, and families of asteroids and KBOs. The
roles of astrometry from the ground, from Gaia and from a Gaia successor are
discussed, but not small-field astrometry from space. It appears from work with
CCD cameras at the 1.55 m astrometric reflector in Flagstaff that an accuracy
of 1 mas is the best possible from the ground during one night observing when
using ordinary telescopes, i.e. without wave-front correctors, and for field
sizes larger than 2 arcmin. It has been seen that the same accuracies can be
reached with the much larger 4-m class telescope on Hawaii although it is not
specifically designed for astrometry. The accuracy of 1 mas from the ground
refers mainly to non-moving point sources, but it is expected that 1 mas can be
reached from the ground for solar system bodies from many nights of
observations when phase effects are taken into account.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01925 [pdf] - 1579768
The Baltic Meetings 1957 to 1967
Submitted: 2015-12-07, last modified: 2017-08-03
The Baltic meetings of astronomers from Northern Germany and Scandinavia
began in 1957 and gathered up to 70 participants. Reports of the presentations
are available from all meetings, providing an overview of the interests of
astronomers in this part of the world 50 years ago. Most interesting to see for
a young astronomer in our days, I think, is that a large part of the time was
about astrometry. This focus on astrometry was the basis for the scientific
knowhow which made the idea of space astrometry realistic, resulting in the
approval by ESA of the first astrometry satellite Hipparcos in 1980 which
brought a revolution of high-precision astrometry of positions, motions and
distances of stars. The correspondence with ten observatories shows that only
one of them has any archive of letters at all from the 1950s, that is in
Copenhagen where about 7000 letters on scientific and administrative matters
are extant. - These letters have now been stored in the Rigsarkivet.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01924 [pdf] - 1579767
Young astronomer in Denmark 1946 to 1958
Submitted: 2015-12-07, last modified: 2017-08-03
This is a personal account of how I became an astronomer. Fascinated by the
stars and planets in the dark sky over Lolland, an island 100 km south of
Copenhagen, the interest in astronomy was growing. Encouraged by my teachers, I
polished mirrors and built telescopes with generous help from the local
blacksmith and I observed light curves of variable stars. Studies at the
Copenhagen University from 1950 gradually led me deeper into astronomy,
especially astrometry (the astronomy of positions), guided by professor Bengt
Str\"omgren and my mentor dr. phil. Peter Naur. I was lucky to take part in the
buildup of the new observatory at Brorfelde during the first difficult years
and the ideas I gathered there have contributed to the two astrometry
satellites Hipparcos and Gaia launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in
respectively 1989 and 2013.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.2190 [pdf] - 1579552
Absolute astrometry in the next 50 years
Submitted: 2014-08-10, last modified: 2017-08-03
With Gaia in orbit since December 2013 it is time to look at the future of
fundamental astrometry and a time frame of 50 years is needed in this matter. A
space mission with Gaia-like astrometric performance is required, but not
necessarily a Gaia-like satellite. It should be studied whether this can be
obtained within the budget of a medium-size ESA mission. A dozen science issues
for a Gaia successor mission in twenty years, with launch about 2033, are
presented and in this context also other possibilities for absolute astrometry
with milliarcsecond (mas) or sub-mas accuracies are discussed. The three
powerful techniques: VLBI, the MICADO camera on the E-ELT, and the LSST are
described and documented by literature references and by an extensive
correspondence with leading astronomers who readily responded with all the
information I needed. In brief, the two Gaia-like missions would provide an
astrometric foundation for all branches of astronomy from the solar system and
stellar systems, including exo-planet systems, to compact galaxies, quasars and
dark matter (DM) substructures by data which cannot be surpassed in the next 50
years. - In April 2017 ESA selected our proposal Hobbs et al. (2016) for study
of a detector with NIR sensitivity for a Gaia successor mission, called
GaiaNIR.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.08097 [pdf] - 1585125
Selected astrometric catalogues
Submitted: 2017-06-25, last modified: 2017-07-09
A selection of astrometric catalogues are presented in three tables for
respectively positions, proper motions and trigonometric parallaxes. The tables
contain characteristics of each catalogue showing the evolution in optical
astrometry, in fact the evolution during the past 2000 years for positions. The
number of stars and the accuracy are summarized by the weight of a catalogue,
proportional with the number of stars and the statistical weight. The present
report originally from 2008 was revised in 2017 with much new information about
the accuracy of catalogues before 1800 AD. For the ongoing Gaia mission the
website and H{\o}g (2017) may be consulted.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1704.05828 [pdf] - 1697874
GIER: A Danish computer from 1961 with a role in the modern revolution
of astronomy
Submitted: 2017-04-19
A Danish computer, GIER, from 1961 played a vital role in the development of
a new method for astrometric measurement. This method, photon counting
astrometry, ultimately led to two satellites with a significant role in the
modern revolution of astronomy. A GIER was installed at the Hamburg Observatory
in 1964 where it was used to implement the entirely new method for the
measurement of stellar positions by means of a meridian circle, then the
fundamental instrument of astrometry. An expedition to Perth in Western
Australia with the instrument and the computer was a success. This method was
also implemented in space in the first ever astrometric satellite Hipparcos
launched by ESA in 1989. The Hipparcos results published in 1997 revolutionized
astrometry with an impact in all branches of astronomy from the solar system
and stellar structure to cosmic distances and the dynamics of the Milky Way. In
turn, the results paved the way for a successor, the one million times more
powerful Gaia astrometry satellite launched by ESA in 2013. Preparations for a
Gaia successor in twenty years are making progress.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1612.02952 [pdf] - 1538988
Gaia data release 1, the photometric data
van Leeuwen, F.;
Evans, D. W.;
De Angeli, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Busso, G.;
Cacciari, C.;
Riello, M.;
Pancino, E.;
Altavilla, G.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Burgess, P.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Davidson, M.;
De Luise, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Galleti, S.;
Gilmore, G.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Holland, G.;
MacDonald, I.;
Marinoni, S.;
Montegrffo, P.;
Osborne, P.;
Ragaini, S.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rowell, N.;
Voss, H.;
Walton, N. A.;
Weiler, M.;
Castellani, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Høg, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Millar, N. R.;
Pagani, C.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pulone, L.;
Rixon, G.;
Suess, F. F.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Alecu, A.;
Allan, P. M.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Belokurov, V.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Brown, S.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Burgon, R.;
Campbell, H.;
Collins, R. S.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Ducourant, C.;
van Elteren, A.;
Evans, N. W.;
Federici, L.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraser, M.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, A. D.;
Iannicola, G.;
Irwin, M.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Mann, R. G.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Masana, E.;
Munari, U.;
Ortiz, P.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Peltzer, C.;
Portell, J.;
Read, A.;
Terrett, D.;
Torra, J.;
Trager, S. C.;
Troisi, L.;
Valentini, G.;
Vallenari, A.;
Wevers, T.
Submitted: 2016-12-09
Context. This paper presents an overview of the photometric data that are
part of the first Gaia data release. Aims. The principles of the processing and
the main characteristics of the Gaia photometric data are presented. Methods.
The calibration strategy is outlined briefly and the main properties of the
resulting photometry are presented. Results. Relations with other broadband
photometric systems are provided. The overall precision for the Gaia photometry
is shown to be at the milli-magnitude level and has a clear potential to
improve further in future releases.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1503.02874 [pdf] - 1212342
A study of purely astrometric selection of extragalactic point sources
with Gaia
Submitted: 2015-03-10, last modified: 2015-05-08
Selection of extragalactic point sources, e.g. QSOs, is often hampered by
significant selection effects causing existing samples to have rather complex
selection functions. We explore whether a purely astrometric selection of
extragalactic point sources, e.g. QSOs, is feasible with the ongoing Gaia
mission. Such a selection would be interesting as it would be unbiased in terms
of colours of the targets and hence would allow selection also with colours in
the stellar sequence. We have analyzed a total of 18 representative regions of
the sky by using GUMS, the simulator prepared for ESAs Gaia mission, both in
the range of $12\le G \le 20$ mag and $12\le G \le 18$ mag. For each region we
determine the density of apparently stationary stellar sources, i.e. sources
for which Gaia cannot measure a significant proper motion. The density is
contrasted with the density of extragalactic point sources, e.g. QSOs, in order
to establish in which celestial directions a pure astrometric selection is
feasible. When targeting regions at galactic latitude $|b| \ge 30^\mathrm{o}$
the ratio of QSOs to apparently stationary stars is above 50\% and when
observing towards the poles the fraction of QSOs goes up to about $\sim80$\%.
We show that the proper motions from the proposed Gaia successor mission in
about 20 years would dramatically improve these results at all latitudes.
Detection of QSOs solely from zero proper motion, unbiased by any assumptions
on spectra, might lead to the discovery of new types of QSOs or new classes of
extragalactic point sources.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.2122 [pdf] - 903619
The Astrometric Foundation of Astrophysics
Submitted: 2014-08-09, last modified: 2014-12-04
Astrophysical studies require a knowledge of very accurate positions, motions
and distances of stars. A brief overview is given of the significance and
development of astrometry by ESA's two astrometric satellites, Hipparcos and
Gaia, launched in respectively 1989 and 2013. The astrometric foundation of all
branches of astronomy from the solar system and stellar systems to compact
galaxies, quasars and dark matter is being revolutionized by the observations
from these satellites. The future of fundamental astrometry must be considered
in a time frame of 50 years, therefore science issues for a Gaia successor
mission in twenty years are discussed in an extensive report: "Absolute
astrometry in the next 50 years" available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.2190
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4668 [pdf] - 863754
Interferometry from Space: A Great Dream
Submitted: 2014-08-20
During some thirty years, 1980-2010, technical studies of optical
interferometry from instruments in space were pursued as promising for higher
spatial resolution and for higher astrometric accuracy. Nulling interferometry
was studied for both high spatial resolution and high contrast. These studies
were great dreams deserving further historical attention. ESA's interest in
interferometry began in the early 1980s. The studies of optical interferometry
for the global astrometry mission GAIA began in 1993 and ended in 1998 when
interferometry was dropped as unsuited for the purpose, and the Gaia mission to
be launched in 2013 is not based on interferometry. \c{opyright} Anita
Publications. All rights reserved.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.4341 [pdf] - 863700
Exo-Jupiters and Saturns from two Gaia-like missions
Submitted: 2014-08-19
Detection and orbit determination for thousands of planets with periods up to
about 40 years would be obtained by astrometry from two Gaia-like missions,
results which cannot be obtained by any other mission, planned or proposed. A
billion stars of all spectral types will be surveyed. A comprehensive knowledge
about heavy planets with these periods, reaching well beyond the snow line of
any system, will lead to a better understanding of the formation and evolution
of planets, also in the habitable zone.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.3299 [pdf] - 863523
Astrometry for Dynamics
Submitted: 2014-08-14
In May 2013, I responded with the present paper to ESA's call for White
Papers for the definition of Large missions. This was half a year before the
launch of ESA's large astrometry mission Gaia. The present proposal for a Gaia
successor mission is similar to Gaia, because two Gaia-like missions at an
interval of about twenty years would provide a foundation for studies of
dynamics in all branches of astronomy from the solar system and stellar systems
to compact galaxies, quasars and dark matter by astrometric data which cannot
be surpassed in the next 50 years.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.3305 [pdf] - 863526
A Gaia successor with NIR Sensors
Submitted: 2014-08-14
The expected accurate astrometric data from Gaia offer the opportunity and
the obligation to exploitation by a second all-sky mission. Therefore a
proposal was submitted to ESA in May 2013 for a Gaia-like mission in about
twenty years. Two new designs are here considered with NIR sensors in addition
to the visual CCDs as in Gaia. This has been suggested by several colleagues in
order to get better astrometry in obscured regions. A first design with CMOS
sensors was quickly abandoned for technical reasons. The second design with
specially developed CCDs for NIR looked more promising. But a deeper study
showed that the longer wavelength in the near infrared at two microns
deteriorates astrometry so much that only heavily obscured stars of extremely
red types as M5III would obtain a better accuracy. Thus, an option with NIR
sensors does not seem promissing.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.2407 [pdf] - 863371
Astrometry 1960-80: from Hamburg to Hipparcos
Submitted: 2014-08-08
Astrometry, the most ancient branch of astronomy, was facing extinction
during much of the 20th century in the competition with astrophysics. The
revival of astrometry came with the European astrometry satellite Hipparcos,
approved by ESA in 1980 and launched 1989. Photon-counting astrometry was the
basic measuring technique in Hipparcos, a technique invented by the author in
1960 in Hamburg. The technique was implemented on the Repsold meridian circle
for the Hamburg expedition to Perth in Western Australia where it worked well
during 1967-72. This success paved the way for space astrometry, pioneered in
France and implemented on Hipparcos. This report gives a detailed personal
account of my life and work in Hamburg Bergedorf where I lived with my family
half a century ago.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.0879 [pdf] - 353887
Astrometry history: Roemer and Gaia
Submitted: 2011-05-04
During the Hipparcos mission in September 1992, I presented a concept for
using direct imaging on CCDs in scanning mode in a new and very powerful
astrometric satellite, Roemer. The Roemer concept with larger aperture
telescopes for higher accuracy was developed by ESA and a mission was approved
in 2000, expected to be a million times better than Hipparcos. The present name
Gaia for the mission reminds of an interferometric option also studied in the
period 1993-97, and the evolution of optics and detection in this period is the
main subject of the present report. The transition from an interferometric GAIA
to a large Roemer was made on 15 January 1998. It will be shown that without
the interferometric GAIA option, ESA would hardly have selected astrometry for
a Cornerstone study in 1997, and consequently we would not have had the
Roemer/Gaia mission.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.0634 [pdf] - 351546
Astrometry during the past 100 years
Submitted: 2011-05-03
The reports from 2008: "Astrometry and optics during the past 2000 years",
are available at arXiv and at my website: www.astro.ku.dk/~erik/History.pdf .
Here are now further contributions to the history of astrometry related to
space astrometry. The development of photoelectric astrometry is followed from
an experiment in 1925 up to the Hipparcos satellite mission in the years
1989-93. This period continues with my proposal in 1992 for CCD astrometry with
a scanning satellite called Roemer, which led to the Gaia mission due for
launch in 2013. Lectures on astrometry are described. - Further installments
are planned.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1104.4554 [pdf] - 351497
Astrometry during the past 2000 years
Submitted: 2011-04-23, last modified: 2011-05-03
The satellite missions Hipparcos and Gaia by the European Space Agency will
together bring a decrease of astrometric errors by a factor 10000, four orders
of magnitude, more than was achieved during the preceding 500 years. This
modern development of astrometry was at first obtained by photoelectric
astrometry. An experiment with this technique in 1925 led to the Hipparcos
satellite mission in the years 1989-93 as described in the following reports
Nos. 1 and 10. The report No. 11 is about the subsequent period of space
astrometry with CCDs in a scanning satellite. This period began in 1992 with my
proposal of a mission called Roemer, which led to the Gaia mission due for
launch in 2013. My contributions to the history of astrometry and optics are
based on 50 years of work in the field of astrometry but the reports cover
spans of time within the past 2000 years, e.g., 400 years of astrometry, 650
years of optics, and the "miraculous" approval of the Hipparcos satellite
mission during a few months of 1980.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101235 [pdf] - 40373
GAIA: Composition, Formation and Evolution of the Galaxy
Perryman, M. A. C.;
de Boer, K. S.;
Gilmore, G.;
Høg, E.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Pace, O.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.
Submitted: 2001-01-15
The GAIA astrometric mission has recently been approved as one of the next
two `cornerstones' of ESA's science programme, with a launch date target of not
later than mid-2012. GAIA will provide positional and radial velocity
measurements with the accuracies needed to produce a stereoscopic and kinematic
census of about one billion stars throughout our Galaxy (and into the Local
Group), amounting to about 1 per cent of the Galactic stellar population.
GAIA's main scientific goal is to clarify the origin and history of our Galaxy,
from a quantitative census of the stellar populations. It will advance
questions such as when the stars in our Galaxy formed, when and how it was
assembled, and its distribution of dark matter. The survey aims for
completeness to V=20 mag, with accuracies of about 10 microarcsec at 15 mag.
Combined with astrophysical information for each star, provided by on-board
multi-colour photometry and (limited) spectroscopy, these data will have the
precision necessary to quantify the early formation, and subsequent dynamical,
chemical and star formation evolution of our Galaxy. Additional products
include detection and orbital classification of tens of thousands of
extra-Solar planetary systems, and a comprehensive survey of some 10^5-10^6
minor bodies in our Solar System, through galaxies in the nearby Universe, to
some 500,000 distant quasars. It will provide a number of stringent new tests
of general relativity and cosmology. The complete satellite system was
evaluated as part of a detailed technology study, including a detailed payload
design, corresponding accuracy assesments, and results from a prototype data
reduction development.