sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Högås, Marcus

Normalized to: Högås, M.

2 article(s) in total. 3 co-authors, from 1 to 2 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1910.01651  [pdf] - 2086433
On the stability of bimetric structure formation
Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures. v2 slight updates in accordance with the published version
Submitted: 2019-10-03, last modified: 2020-04-29
Bimetric gravity can reproduce the accelerated expansion of the Universe, without a cosmological constant. However, the stability of these solutions to linear perturbations has been questioned, suggesting exponential growth of structure in this approximation. We present a simple model of structure formation, for which an analytical solution is derived. The solution is well-behaved, showing that there is no physical instability with respect to these perturbations. The model can yield a growth of structure exhibiting measurable differences from $\Lambda$CDM.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1904.07869  [pdf] - 2060107
Covariant BSSN formulation in bimetric relativity
Comments: It matches the published version and its corrigendum at https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab74f7. 14 pages plus appendices. The ancillary files contain the supplementary material and the paper in colors
Submitted: 2019-04-16, last modified: 2020-03-06
Numerical integration of the field equations in bimetric relativity is necessary to obtain solutions describing realistic systems. Thus, it is crucial to recast the equations as a well-posed problem. In general relativity, under certain assumptions, the covariant BSSN formulation is a strongly hyperbolic formulation of the Einstein equations, hence its Cauchy problem is well-posed. In this paper, we establish the covariant BSSN formulation of the bimetric field equations. It shares many features with the corresponding formulation in general relativity, but there are a few fundamental differences between them. Some of these differences depend on the gauge choice and alter the hyperbolic structure of the system of partial differential equations compared to general relativity. Accordingly, the strong hyperbolicity of the system cannot be claimed yet, under the same assumptions as in general relativity. In the paper, we stress the differences compared with general relativity and state the main issues that should be tackled next, to draw a road map towards numerical bimetric relativity.