Normalized to: Guyonnet, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1906.01967 [pdf] - 1974310
Local monitoring of atmospheric transparency from the NASA MERRA-2
global assimilation system
Submitted: 2019-06-04, last modified: 2019-10-07
Ground-based astronomy has to correct astronomical observations from the
impact of the atmospheric transparency and its variability.The current
objective of several observatories is to achieve a sub-percent level monitoring
of atmospheric transmission. A promising approach has been to combine internal
calibration of the observations with various external meteorological data
sources, upon avail-ability and depending on quality. In this paper we
investigate the use of the NASA Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research
and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) which is a general circulation model
(GCM) and data assimilation system that renders freely available for any given
site, at any time, all the parameters constraining atmospheric transmission.
This paper demonstrates the extraction of the relevant atmospheric parameters
for optical astronomy at two sites: Mauna Kea in Hawaii and Cerro Tololo
InternationalObservatory in Chile. The temporal variability for the past eight
years (annual, overnight and hourly), as well as the spatial gradients of
ozone, precipitable water vapor, and aerosol optical depth is presented and
their respective impacts on the atmospheric transparency is analyzed.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.03248 [pdf] - 1794996
An Overview of the LSST Image Processing Pipelines
Bosch, James;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Armstrong, Robert;
Bellm, Eric;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Eggl, Siegfried;
Findeisen, Krzysztof;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Ivezić, Željko;
Jenness, Tim;
Kovács, Gábor;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Lust, Nate B.;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Meyers, Joshua;
Moolekamp, Fred;
Morrison, Christopher B.;
Morton, Timothy D.;
O'Mullane, William;
Parejko, John K.;
Plazas, Andrés A.;
Price, Paul A.;
Rawls, Meredith L.;
Reed, Sophie L.;
Schellart, Pim;
Slater, Colin T.;
Sullivan, Ian;
Swinbank, John. D.;
Taranu, Dan;
Waters, Christopher Z.;
Wood-Vasey, W. M.
Submitted: 2018-12-07
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is an ambitious astronomical
survey with a similarly ambitious Data Management component. Data Management
for LSST includes processing on both nightly and yearly cadences to generate
transient alerts, deep catalogs of the static sky, and forced photometry
light-curves for billions of objects at hundreds of epochs, spanning at least a
decade. The algorithms running in these pipelines are individually
sophisticated and interact in subtle ways. This paper provides an overview of
those pipelines, focusing more on those interactions than the details of any
individual algorithm.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1806.02422 [pdf] - 1695831
Testing of the LSST's photometric calibration strategy at the CTIO 0.9
meter telescope
Submitted: 2018-06-06
The calibration hardware system of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)
is designed to measure two quantities: a telescope's instrumental response and
atmospheric transmission, both as a function of wavelength. First of all, a
"collimated beam projector" is designed to measure the instrumental response
function by projecting monochromatic light through a mask and a collimating
optic onto the telescope. During the measurement, the light level is monitored
with a NIST-traceable photodiode. This method does not suffer from stray light
effects or the reflections (known as ghosting) present when using a flat-field
screen illumination, which has a systematic source of uncertainty from
uncontrolled reflections. It allows for an independent measurement of the
throughput of the telescope's optical train as well as each filter's
transmission as a function of position on the primary mirror. Second, CALSPEC
stars can be used as calibrated light sources to illuminate the atmosphere and
measure its transmission. To measure the atmosphere's transfer function, we use
the telescope's imager with a Ronchi grating in place of a filter to configure
it as a low resolution slitless spectrograph. In this paper, we describe this
calibration strategy, focusing on results from a prototype system at the Cerro
Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) 0.9 meter telescope. We compare the
instrumental throughput measurements to nominal values measured using a
laboratory spectrophotometer, and we describe measurements of the atmosphere
made via CALSPEC standard stars during the same run.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.2366 [pdf] - 1934226
LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data
Products
Ivezić, Željko;
Kahn, Steven M.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Abel, Bob;
Acosta, Emily;
Allsman, Robyn;
Alonso, David;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrew, John;
Angel, James Roger P.;
Angeli, George Z.;
Ansari, Reza;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Araujo, Constanza;
Armstrong, Robert;
Arndt, Kirk T.;
Astier, Pierre;
Aubourg, Éric;
Auza, Nicole;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Bard, Deborah J.;
Barr, Jeff D.;
Barrau, Aurelian;
Bartlett, James G.;
Bauer, Amanda E.;
Bauman, Brian J.;
Baumont, Sylvain;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Beldica, Cristina;
Bellavia, Steve;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Blanc, Guillaume;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Blandford, Roger D.;
Bloom, Josh S.;
Bogart, Joanne;
Bond, Tim W.;
Borgland, Anders W.;
Borne, Kirk;
Bosch, James F.;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Brackett, Craig A.;
Bradshaw, Andrew;
Brandt, William Nielsen;
Brown, Michael E.;
Bullock, James S.;
Burchat, Patricia;
Burke, David L.;
Cagnoli, Gianpietro;
Calabrese, Daniel;
Callahan, Shawn;
Callen, Alice L.;
Chandrasekharan, Srinivasan;
Charles-Emerson, Glenaver;
Chesley, Steve;
Cheu, Elliott C.;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Chiang, James;
Chirino, Carol;
Chow, Derek;
Ciardi, David R.;
Claver, Charles F.;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Cockrum, Joseph J.;
Coles, Rebecca;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Cook, Kem H.;
Cooray, Asantha;
Covey, Kevin R.;
Cribbs, Chris;
Cui, Wei;
Cutri, Roc;
Daly, Philip N.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daruich, Felipe;
Daubard, Guillaume;
Daues, Greg;
Dawson, William;
Delgado, Francisco;
Dellapenna, Alfred;
de Peyster, Robert;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Digel, Seth W.;
Doherty, Peter;
Dubois, Richard;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory P.;
Durech, Josef;
Economou, Frossie;
Eracleous, Michael;
Ferguson, Henry;
Figueroa, Enrique;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Focke, Warren;
Foss, Michael D.;
Frank, James;
Freemon, Michael D.;
Gangler, Emmanuel;
Gawiser, Eric;
Geary, John C.;
Gee, Perry;
Geha, Marla;
Gessner, Charles J. B.;
Gibson, Robert R.;
Gilmore, D. Kirk;
Glanzman, Thomas;
Glick, William;
Goldina, Tatiana;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Goodenow, Iain;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Gressler, William J.;
Gris, Philippe;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Haller, Gunther;
Harris, Ron;
Hascall, Patrick A.;
Haupt, Justine;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Herrmann, Sven;
Hileman, Edward;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Hodgson, John A.;
Hogan, Craig;
Huang, Dajun;
Huffer, Michael E.;
Ingraham, Patrick;
Innes, Walter R.;
Jacoby, Suzanne H.;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jee, James;
Jenness, Tim;
Jernigan, Garrett;
Jevremović, Darko;
Johns, Kenneth;
Johnson, Anthony S.;
Johnson, Margaret W. G.;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Juramy-Gilles, Claire;
Jurić, Mario;
Kalirai, Jason S.;
Kallivayalil, Nitya J.;
Kalmbach, Bryce;
Kantor, Jeffrey P.;
Karst, Pierre;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Kelly, Heather;
Kessler, Richard;
Kinnison, Veronica;
Kirkby, David;
Knox, Lloyd;
Kotov, Ivan V.;
Krabbendam, Victor L.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Kubánek, Petr;
Kuczewski, John;
Kulkarni, Shri;
Ku, John;
Kurita, Nadine R.;
Lage, Craig S.;
Lambert, Ron;
Lange, Travis;
Langton, J. Brian;
Guillou, Laurent Le;
Levine, Deborah;
Liang, Ming;
Lim, Kian-Tat;
Lintott, Chris J.;
Long, Kevin E.;
Lopez, Margaux;
Lotz, Paul J.;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Lust, Nate B.;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Marsh, Darren S.;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Marshall, Stuart;
May, Morgan;
McKercher, Robert;
McQueen, Michelle;
Meyers, Joshua;
Migliore, Myriam;
Miller, Michelle;
Mills, David J.;
Miraval, Connor;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Monet, David G.;
Moniez, Marc;
Monkewitz, Serge;
Montgomery, Christopher;
Mueller, Fritz;
Muller, Gary P.;
Arancibia, Freddy Muñoz;
Neill, Douglas R.;
Newbry, Scott P.;
Nief, Jean-Yves;
Nomerotski, Andrei;
Nordby, Martin;
O'Connor, Paul;
Oliver, John;
Olivier, Scot S.;
Olsen, Knut;
O'Mullane, William;
Ortiz, Sandra;
Osier, Shawn;
Owen, Russell E.;
Pain, Reynald;
Palecek, Paul E.;
Parejko, John K.;
Parsons, James B.;
Pease, Nathan M.;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Peterson, John R.;
Petravick, Donald L.;
Petrick, M. E. Libby;
Petry, Cathy E.;
Pierfederici, Francesco;
Pietrowicz, Stephen;
Pike, Rob;
Pinto, Philip A.;
Plante, Raymond;
Plate, Stephen;
Price, Paul A.;
Prouza, Michael;
Radeka, Veljko;
Rajagopal, Jayadev;
Rasmussen, Andrew P.;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Reil, Kevin A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Reuter, Michael A.;
Ridgway, Stephen T.;
Riot, Vincent J.;
Ritz, Steve;
Robinson, Sean;
Roby, William;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rosing, Wayne;
Roucelle, Cecille;
Rumore, Matthew R.;
Russo, Stefano;
Saha, Abhijit;
Sassolas, Benoit;
Schalk, Terry L.;
Schellart, Pim;
Schindler, Rafe H.;
Schmidt, Samuel;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schneider, Michael D.;
Schoening, William;
Schumacher, German;
Schwamb, Megan E.;
Sebag, Jacques;
Selvy, Brian;
Sembroski, Glenn H.;
Seppala, Lynn G.;
Serio, Andrew;
Serrano, Eduardo;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Shipsey, Ian;
Sick, Jonathan;
Silvestri, Nicole;
Slater, Colin T.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, R. Chris;
Sobhani, Shahram;
Soldahl, Christine;
Storrie-Lombardi, Lisa;
Stover, Edward;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Street, Rachel A.;
Stubbs, Christopher W.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Sweeney, Donald;
Swinbank, John D.;
Szalay, Alexander;
Takacs, Peter;
Tether, Stephen A.;
Thaler, Jon J.;
Thayer, John Gregg;
Thomas, Sandrine;
Thukral, Vaikunth;
Tice, Jeffrey;
Trilling, David E.;
Turri, Max;
Van Berg, Richard;
Berk, Daniel Vanden;
Vetter, Kurt;
Virieux, Francoise;
Vucina, Tomislav;
Wahl, William;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Walsh, Brian;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Daniel L.;
Wang, Shin-Yawn;
Warner, Michael;
Wiecha, Oliver;
Willman, Beth;
Winters, Scott E.;
Wittman, David;
Wolff, Sidney C.;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Wu, Xiuqin;
Xin, Bo;
Yoachim, Peter;
Zhan, Hu
Submitted: 2008-05-15, last modified: 2018-05-23
(Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in
the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of
science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will
have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is
driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking
an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and
mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at
Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m
effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel
camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second
exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given
night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000
square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$
point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The
project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations
by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with
$\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$,
covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time
will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a
18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the
anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The
remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a
Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products,
including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion
objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.01964 [pdf] - 1531202
High fidelity point-spread function retrieval in the presence of
electrostatic, hysteretic pixel response
Rasmussen, Andrew;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Lage, Craig;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Astier, Pierre;
Doherty, Peter;
Gilmore, Kirk;
Kotov, Ivan;
Lupton, Robert;
Nomerotski, Andrei;
O'Connor, Paul;
Stubbs, Christopher;
Tyson, Anthony;
Walter, Christopher
Submitted: 2016-08-05, last modified: 2016-09-12
We employ electrostatic conversion drift calculations to match CCD pixel
signal covariances observed in flat field exposures acquired using candidate
sensor devices for the LSST Camera. We thus constrain pixel geometry
distortions present at the end of integration, based on signal images recorded.
We use available data from several operational voltage parameter settings to
validate our understanding. Our primary goal is to optimize flux point-spread
function (FPSF) estimation quantitatively, and thereby minimize sensor-induced
errors which may limit performance in precision astronomy applications. We
consider alternative compensation scenarios that will take maximum advantage of
our understanding of this underlying mechanism in data processing pipelines
currently under development.
To quantitatively capture the pixel response in high-contrast/high dynamic
range operational extrema, we propose herein some straightforward laboratory
tests that involve altering the time order of source illumination on sensors,
within individual test exposures. Hence the word {\it hysteretic} in the title
of this paper.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.08212 [pdf] - 1269370
The DICE calibration project: design, characterization, and first
results
Regnault, N.;
Guyonnet, A.;
Schahmanèche, K.;
Guillou, L. Le;
Antilogus, P.;
Astier, P.;
Barrelet, E.;
Betoule, M.;
Bongard, S.;
Cuillandre, J. -C.;
Juramy, C.;
Pain, R.;
Rocci, P. -F.;
Tisserand, P.;
Villa, F.
Submitted: 2015-06-26
We describe the design, operation, and first results of a photometric
calibration project, called DICE (Direct Illumination Calibration Experiment),
aiming at achieving precise instrumental calibration of optical telescopes. The
heart of DICE is an illumination device composed of 24 narrow-spectrum,
high-intensity, light-emitting diodes (LED) chosen to cover the
ultraviolet-to-near-infrared spectral range. It implements a point-like source
placed at a finite distance from the telescope entrance pupil, yielding a flat
field illumination that covers the entire field of view of the imager. The
purpose of this system is to perform a lightweight routine monitoring of the
imager passbands with a precision better than 5 per-mil on the relative
passband normalisations and about 3{\AA} on the filter cutoff positions. The
light source is calibrated on a spectrophotometric bench. As our fundamental
metrology standard, we use a photodiode calibrated at NIST. The radiant
intensity of each beam is mapped, and spectra are measured for each LED. All
measurements are conducted at temperatures ranging from 0{\deg}C to 25{\deg}C
in order to study the temperature dependence of the system. The photometric and
spectroscopic measurements are combined into a model that predicts the spectral
intensity of the source as a function of temperature. We find that the
calibration beams are stable at the $10^{-4}$ level -- after taking the slight
temperature dependence of the LED emission properties into account. We show
that the spectral intensity of the source can be characterised with a precision
of 3{\AA} in wavelength. In flux, we reach an accuracy of about 0.2-0.5%
depending on how we understand the off-diagonal terms of the error budget
affecting the calibration of the NIST photodiode. With a routine 60-mn
calibration program, the apparatus is able to constrain the passbands at the
targeted precision levels.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1501.01577 [pdf] - 936263
Evidence for self-interaction of charge distribution in charge-coupled
devices
Submitted: 2015-01-07, last modified: 2015-01-08
Charge-coupled devices (CCDs) are widely used in astronomy to carry out a
variety of measurements, such as for flux or shape of astrophysical objects.
The data reduction procedures almost always assume that ther esponse of a given
pixel to illumination is independent of the content of the neighboring pixels.
We show evidence that this simple picture is not exact for several CCD sensors.
Namely, we provide evidence that localized distributions of charges (resulting
from star illumination or laboratory luminous spots) tend to broaden linearly
with increasing brightness by up to a few percent over the whole dynamic range.
We propose a physical explanation for this "brighter-fatter" effect, which
implies that flatfields do not exactly follow Poisson statistics: the variance
of flatfields grows less rapidly than their average, and neighboring pixels
show covariances, which increase similarly to the square of the flatfield
average. These covariances decay rapidly with pixel separation. We observe the
expected departure from Poisson statistics of flatfields on CCD devices and
show that the observed effects are compatible with Coulomb forces induced by
stored charges that deflect forthcoming charges. We extract the strength of the
deflections from the correlations of flatfield images and derive the evolution
of star shapes with increasing flux. We show for three types of sensors that
within statistical uncertainties,our proposed method properly bridges
statistical properties of flatfields and the brighter-fatter effect.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.0725 [pdf] - 1203166
The brighter-fatter effect and pixel correlations in CCD sensors
Submitted: 2014-02-04
We present evidence that spots imaged using astronomical CCDs do not exactly
scale with flux: bright spots tend to be broader than faint ones, using the
same illumination pattern. We measure that the linear size of spots or stars,
of typical size 3 to 4 pixels FWHM, increase linearly with their flux by up to
$2\%$ over the full CCD dynamic range. This brighter-fatter effect affects both
deep-depleted and thinned CCD sensors. We propose that this effect is a direct
consequence of the distortions of the drift electric field sourced by charges
accumulated within the CCD during the exposure and experienced by forthcoming
light-induced charges in the same exposure. The pixel boundaries then become
slightly dynamical: overfilled pixels become increasingly smaller than their
neighbors, so that bright star sizes, measured in number of pixels, appear
larger than those of faint stars. This interpretation of the brighter-fatter
effect implies that pixels in flat-fields should exhibit statistical
correlations, sourced by Poisson fluctuations, that we indeed directly detect.
We propose to use the measured correlations in flat-fields to derive how pixel
boundaries shift under the influence of a given charge pattern, which allows us
to quantitatively predict how star shapes evolve with flux. This physical model
of the brighter-fatter effect also explains the commonly observed phenomenon
that the spatial variance of CCD flat-fields increases less rapidly than their
average.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.6301 [pdf] - 557215
(Sn)DICE: A Calibration System Designed for Wide Field Imagers
Submitted: 2012-08-30
Dark Energy studies with type Ia supernovae set very tight constraints on the
photometric calibration of the imagers used to detect the supernovae and follow
up their flux variations. Among the key challenges is the measurement of the
shape and normalization of the instrumental throughput. The DICE system was
developed by members of the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS), building upon the
lessons learnt working with the MegaCam imager. It consists in a very stable
light source, placed in the telescope enclosure, and generating compact,
conical beams, yielding an almost flat illumination of the imager focal plane.
The calibration light is generated by narrow spectrum LEDs selected to cover
the entire wavelength range of the imager. It is monitored in real time using
control photodiodes. A first DICE demonstrator, SnDICE has been installed at
CFHT. A second generation instrument (SkyDICE) has been installed in the
enclosure of the SkyMapper telescope. We present the main goals of the project.
We discuss the main difficulties encountered when trying to calibrate a wide
field imager, such as MegaCam (or SkyMapper) using such a calibrated light
source.