The paper analyzes the structure and dynamics of a quiescent prominence that occurred on October 22, 2013. We aim to determine the physical characteristics of the observed prominence using MgII k and h, CII (1334 and 1336 A), and SiIV (1394 A) lines observed by IRIS. We employed the 1D non-LTE modeling of MgII lines assuming static isothermal-isobaric slabs. We selected a large grid of models with realistic input parameters and computed synthetic MgII lines. The method of Scargle periodograms was used to detect possible prominence oscillations. We analyzed 2160 points of the observed prominence in five different sections along the slit averaged over ten pixels due to low signal to noise ratio in the CII and SiIV lines. We computed the integrated intensity for all studied lines, while the central intensity and reversal ratio was determined only for both MgII and CII 1334 lines. We plotted several correlations: time evolution of the integrated intensities and central intensities, scatter plots between all combinations of line integrated intensities, and reversal ratio as a function of integrated intensity. We also compared MgII observations with the models. Results show that more than two-thirds of MgII profiles and about one-half of CII 1334 profiles are reversed. Profiles of SiIV are generally unreversed. The MgII and CII lines are optically thick, while the SiIV line is optically thin. The studied prominence shows no global oscillations in the MgII and CII lines. Therefore, the observed time variations are caused by random motions of fine structures with velocities up to 10 km/s. The observed average ratio of MgII k to MgII h line intensities can be used to determine the prominence's characteristic temperature. Certain disagreements between observed and synthetic line intensities of MgII lines point to the necessity of using more complex 2D multi-thread modeling in the future.

We determine an optimal width and shape of the narrow-band filter centered around the He\,{\sc i} D$_{3}$ line for prominence and coronal mass ejection (CME) observations with the ASPIICS ({\it Association of Spacecraft for Polarimetric and Imaging Investigation of the Corona of the Sun}) coronagraph onboard the PROBA-3 ({\it Project for On-board Autonomy}) satellite, to be launched in 2020. We analyze He\,{\sc i} D$_{3}$ line intensities for three representative non-LTE prominence models at temperatures 8, 30 and 100~kK computed by the radiative transfer code and the prominence visible-light (VL) emission due to Thomson scattering on the prominence electrons. We compute various useful relations at prominence line-of-sight (LOS) velocities of 0, 100, and 300~km~s$^{-1}$ for 20~\AA~wide flat filter and three Gaussian filters with full width at half maximum (FWHM) equal to 5, 10, and 20~\AA~to show the relative brightness contribution of the He\,{\sc i} D$_{3}$ line and the prominence VL to the visibility in a given narrow-band filter. We also discuss possible signal contamination by Na\,{\sc i} D$_{1}$ and D$_{2}$ lines which otherwise may be useful to detect comets. Results mainly show: i) an optimal narrow-band filter should be flat or somewhere between flat and Gaussian with FWHM of 20~\AA~in order to detect fast moving prominence structures, ii) the maximum emission in the He\,{\sc i} D$_3$ line is at 30~kK and the minimal at 100~kK, and iii) the ratio of emission in the He\,{\sc i} D$_3$ line to the VL emission can provide a useful diagnostic for the temperature of prominence structures. This ratio is up to 10 for hot prominence structures, up to 100 for cool structures and up to 1000 for warm structures.

This document was created by the Solar Simulations for the Atacama Large Millimeter Observatory Network (SSALMON) in preparation of the first regular observations of the Sun with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), which are anticipated to start in ALMA Cycle 4 in October 2016. The science cases presented here demonstrate that a large number of scientifically highly interesting observations could be made already with the still limited solar observing modes foreseen for Cycle 4 and that ALMA has the potential to make important contributions to answering long-standing scientific questions in solar physics. With the proposal deadline for ALMA Cycle 4 in April 2016 and the Commissioning and Science Verification campaign in December 2015 in sight, several of the SSALMON Expert Teams composed strategic documents in which they outlined potential solar observations that could be feasible given the anticipated technical capabilities in Cycle 4. These documents have been combined and supplemented with an analysis, resulting in recommendations for solar observing with ALMA in Cycle 4. In addition, the detailed science cases also demonstrate the scientific priorities of the solar physics community and which capabilities are wanted for the next observing cycles. The work on this White Paper effort was coordinated in close cooperation with the two international solar ALMA development studies led by T. Bastian (NRAO, USA) and R. Brajsa, (ESO). This document will be further updated until the beginning of Cycle 4 in October 2016. In particular, we plan to adjust the technical capabilities of the solar observing modes once finally decided and to further demonstrate the feasibility and scientific potential of the included science cases by means of numerical simulations of the solar atmosphere and corresponding simulated ALMA observations.