sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Grudic, Michael Y.

Normalized to: Grudic, M.

4 article(s) in total. 32 co-authors, from 1 to 4 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,5.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1811.12462  [pdf] - 2045148
Radiative Stellar Feedback in Galaxy Formation: Methods and Physics
Comments: 28 pages, 14 figures. Updated to match published MNRAS version
Submitted: 2018-11-29, last modified: 2020-02-08
Radiative feedback (RFB) from stars plays a key role in galaxies, but remains poorly-understood. We explore this using high-resolution, multi-frequency radiation-hydrodynamics (RHD) simulations from the Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) project. We study ultra-faint dwarf through Milky Way mass scales, including H+He photo-ionization; photo-electric, Lyman Werner, Compton, and dust heating; and single+multiple scattering radiation pressure (RP). We compare distinct numerical algorithms: ray-based LEBRON (exact when optically-thin) and moments-based M1 (exact when optically-thick). The most important RFB channels on galaxy scales are photo-ionization heating and single-scattering RP: in all galaxies, most ionizing/far-UV luminosity (~1/2 of lifetime-integrated bolometric) is absorbed. In dwarfs, the most important effect is photo-ionization heating from the UV background suppressing accretion. In MW-mass galaxies, meta-galactic backgrounds have negligible effects; but local photo-ionization and single-scattering RP contribute to regulating the galactic star formation efficiency and lowering central densities. Without some RFB (or other 'rapid' FB), resolved GMCs convert too-efficiently into stars, making galaxies dominated by hyper-dense, bound star clusters. This makes star formation more violent and 'bursty' when SNe explode in these hyper-clustered objects: thus, including RFB 'smoothes' SFHs. These conclusions are robust to RHD methods, but M1 produces somewhat stronger effects. Like in previous FIRE simulations, IR multiple-scattering is rare (negligible in dwarfs, ~10% of RP in massive galaxies): absorption occurs primarily in 'normal' GMCs with A_v~1.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1702.06148  [pdf] - 1782667
FIRE-2 Simulations: Physics versus Numerics in Galaxy Formation
Comments: 64 pages, 40 figures. Simulation animations and visualizations available at http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~phopkins/Site/animations and http://fire.northwestern.edu . Paper includes complete FIRE algorithms and public ICs (http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~phopkins/publicICs). Updated to match published version
Submitted: 2017-02-20, last modified: 2018-11-11
The Feedback In Realistic Environments (FIRE) project explores feedback in cosmological galaxy formation simulations. Previous FIRE simulations used an identical source code (FIRE-1) for consistency. Motivated by the development of more accurate numerics - including hydrodynamic solvers, gravitational softening, and supernova coupling algorithms - and exploration of new physics (e.g. magnetic fields), we introduce FIRE-2, an updated numerical implementation of FIRE physics for the GIZMO code. We run a suite of simulations and compare against FIRE-1: overall, FIRE-2 improvements do not qualitatively change galaxy-scale properties. We pursue an extensive study of numerics versus physics. Details of the star-formation algorithm, cooling physics, and chemistry have weak effects, provided that we include metal-line cooling and star formation occurs at higher-than-mean densities. We present new resolution criteria for high-resolution galaxy simulations. Most galaxy-scale properties are robust to numerics we test, provided: (1) Toomre masses are resolved; (2) feedback coupling ensures conservation, and (3) individual supernovae are time-resolved. Stellar masses and profiles are most robust to resolution, followed by metal abundances and morphologies, followed by properties of winds and circum-galactic media (CGM). Central (~kpc) mass concentrations in massive (L*) galaxies are sensitive to numerics (via trapping/recycling of winds in hot halos). Multiple feedback mechanisms play key roles: supernovae regulate stellar masses/winds; stellar mass-loss fuels late star formation; radiative feedback suppresses accretion onto dwarfs and instantaneous star formation in disks. We provide all initial conditions and numerical algorithms used.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:1803.07573  [pdf] - 2045133
Numerical Problems in Coupling Photon Momentum (Radiation Pressure) to Gas
Comments: 9 pages, 4 figures. Updated to match accepted MNRAS version
Submitted: 2018-03-20, last modified: 2018-11-11
Radiation pressure (RP; or photon momentum absorbed by gas) is important in a tremendous range of astrophysical systems. But we show the usual method for assigning absorbed photon momentum to gas in numerical radiation-hydrodynamics simulations (integrating over cell volumes or evaluating at cell centers) can severely under-estimate the RP force in the immediate vicinity around un-resolved (point/discrete) sources (and subsequently under-estimate its effects on bulk gas properties), unless photon mean-free-paths are highly-resolved in the fluid grid. The existence of this error is independent of the numerical radiation transfer (RT) method (even in exact ray-tracing/Monte-Carlo methods), because it depends on how the RT solution is interpolated back onto fluid elements. Brute-force convergence (resolving mean-free paths) is impossible in many cases (especially where UV/ionizing photons are involved). Instead, we show a 'face-integrated' method -- integrating and applying the momentum fluxes at interfaces between fluid elements -- better approximates the correct solution at all resolution levels. The 'fix' is simple and we provide example implementations for ray-tracing, Monte-Carlo, and moments RT methods in both grid and mesh-free fluid schemes. We consider an example of star formation in a molecular cloud with UV/ionizing RP. At state-of-the-art resolution, cell-integrated methods under-estimate the net effects of RP by an order of magnitude, leading (incorrectly) to the conclusion that RP is unimportant, while face-integrated methods predict strong self-regulation of star formation and cloud destruction via RP.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:1804.08574  [pdf] - 1728955
Isothermal Fragmentation: Is there a low-mass cut-off?
Comments: 10 pages, 9 figures
Submitted: 2018-04-23, last modified: 2018-06-07
The evolution of self-gravitating clouds of isothermal gas forms the basis of many star formation theories. Therefore it is important to know under what conditions such a cloud will undergo homologous collapse into a single, massive object, or will fragment into a spectrum of smaller ones. And if it fragments, do initial conditions (e.g. Jeans mass, sonic mass) influence the mass function of the fragments, as predicted by many theories of star formation? In this paper we show that the relevant parameter separating homologous collapse from fragmentation is not the Mach number of the initial turbulence (as suspected by many), but the infall Mach number $\mathcal{M}_{\rm infall}\sim\sqrt{G M/(R c_s^2)}$, equivalent to the number of Jeans masses in the initial cloud $N_J$. We also show that fragmenting clouds produce a power-law mass function with slopes close to the expected -2 (i.e. equal mass in all logarithmic mass intervals). However, the low-mass cut-off of this mass function is entirely numerical; the initial properties of the cloud have no effect on it. In other words, if $\mathcal{M}_{\rm infall}\gg 1$, fragmentation proceeds without limit to masses much smaller than the initial Jeans mass.