Normalized to: Gropp, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07251 [pdf] - 2113441
Observation of inverse Compton emission from a long $\gamma$-ray burst
Acciari, V. A.;
Ansoldi, S.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Engels, A. Arbet;
Baack, D.;
Babić, A.;
Banerjee, B.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
González, J. Becerra;
Bednarek, W.;
Bellizzi, L.;
Bernardini, E.;
Berti, A.;
Besenrieder, J.;
Bhattacharyya, W.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Blanch, O.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bošnjak, Ž.;
Busetto, G.;
Carosi, R.;
Ceribella, G.;
Chai, Y.;
Chilingaryan, A.;
Cikota, S.;
Colak, S. M.;
Colin, U.;
Colombo, E.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Covino, S.;
D'Elia, V.;
Da Vela, P.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
De Lotto, B.;
Delfino, M.;
Delgado, J.;
Depaoli, D.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Espiñeira, E. Do Souto;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Donini, A.;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Elsaesser, D.;
Ramazani, V. Fallah;
Fattorini, A.;
Ferrara, G.;
Fidalgo, D.;
Foffano, L.;
Fonseca, M. V.;
Font, L.;
Fruck, C.;
Fukami, S.;
López, R. J. García;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gasparyan, S.;
Gaug, M.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giordano, F.;
Godinović, N.;
Green, D.;
Guberman, D.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hahn, A.;
Herrera, J.;
Hoang, J.;
Hrupec, D.;
Hütten, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inoue, S.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jouvin, L.;
Kerszberg, D.;
Kubo, H.;
Kushida, J.;
Lamastra, A.;
Lelas, D.;
Leone, F.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
López-Oramas, A.;
Loporchio, S.;
Fraga, B. Machado de Oliveira;
Maggio, C.;
Majumdar, P.;
Makariev, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mannheim, K.;
Maraschi, L.;
Mariotti, M.;
Martínez, M.;
Mazin, D.;
Mićanović, S.;
Miceli, D.;
Minev, M.;
Miranda, J. M.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Molina, E.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende, D.;
Moreno, V.;
Moretti, E.;
Munar-Adrover, P.;
Neustroev, V.;
Nigro, C.;
Nilsson, K.;
Ninci, D.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nogués, L.;
Nozaki, S.;
Paiano, S.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paneque, D.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Peñil, P.;
Peresano, M.;
Persic, M.;
Moroni, P. G. Prada;
Prandini, E.;
Puljak, I.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribó, M.;
Rico, J.;
Righi, C.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Saha, L.;
Sahakyan, N.;
Saito, T.;
Sakurai, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Schmidt, K.;
Schweizer, T.;
Sitarek, J.;
Šnidarić, I.;
Sobczynska, D.;
Somero, A.;
Stamerra, A.;
Strom, D.;
Strzys, M.;
Suda, Y.;
Surić, T.;
Takahashi, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terzić, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Torres-Albà, N.;
Tosti, L.;
Vagelli, V.;
van Scherpenberg, J.;
Vanzo, G.;
Acosta, M. Vazquez;
Vigorito, C. F.;
Vitale, V.;
Vovk, I.;
Will, M.;
Zarić, D.;
Nava, L.;
Veres, P.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W. H.;
Hamburg, R.;
Hui, C. M.;
Mailyan, B.;
Preece, R. D.;
Roberts, O.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.;
Kocevski, D.;
Arimoto, M.;
Tak, D.;
Asano, K.;
Axelsson, M.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Gill, R.;
Granot, J.;
McEnery, J.;
Razzaque, S.;
Piron, F.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Campana, S.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Kuin, N. P. M.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Cenko, S. Bradley;
O'Brien, P.;
Capalbi, M.;
D'Aì, A.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Starling, R.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
Ursi, A.;
Tavani, M.;
Cardillo, M.;
Casentini, C.;
Piano, G.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Verrecchia, F.;
Pittori, C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Parmiggiani, N.;
Anderson, G. E.;
Anderson, J. P.;
Bernardi, G.;
Bolmer, J.;
Caballero-García, M. D.;
Carrasco, I. M.;
Castellón, A.;
Segura, N. Castro;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Cherukuri, S. V.;
Cockeram, A. M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
Di Dato, A.;
Diretse, R.;
Fender, R. P.;
Fernández-García, E.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Greiner, J.;
Gromadzki, M.;
Heintz, K. E.;
Heywood, I.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hu, Y. -D.;
Inserra, C.;
Izzo, L.;
Jaiswal, V.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Japelj, J.;
Kankare, E.;
Kann, D. A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Klose, S.;
Levan, A. J.;
Li, X. Y.;
Lotti, S.;
Maguire, K.;
Malesani, D. B.;
Manulis, I.;
Marongiu, M.;
Martin, S.;
Melandri, A.;
Michałowski, M.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Misra, K.;
Moin, A.;
Mooley, K. P.;
Nasri, S.;
Nicholl, M.;
Noschese, A.;
Novara, G.;
Pandey, S. B.;
Peretti, E.;
del Pulgar, C. J. Pérez;
Pérez-Torres, M. A.;
Perley, D. A.;
Piro, L.;
Ragosta, F.;
Resmi, L.;
Ricci, R.;
Rossi, A.;
Sánchez-Ramírez, R.;
Selsing, J.;
Schulze, S.;
Smartt, S. J.;
Smith, I. A.;
Sokolov, V. V.;
Stevens, J.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Thóne, C. C.;
Tiengo, A.;
Tremou, E.;
Troja, E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Vergani, S. D.;
Wieringa, M.;
Woudt, P. A.;
Xu, D.;
Yaron, O.;
Young, D. R.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) originate from ultra-relativistic jets
launched from the collapsing cores of dying massive stars. They are
characterised by an initial phase of bright and highly variable radiation in
the keV-MeV band that is likely produced within the jet and lasts from
milliseconds to minutes, known as the prompt emission. Subsequently, the
interaction of the jet with the external medium generates external shock waves,
responsible for the afterglow emission, which lasts from days to months, and
occurs over a broad energy range, from the radio to the GeV bands. The
afterglow emission is generally well explained as synchrotron radiation by
electrons accelerated at the external shock. Recently, an intense, long-lasting
emission between 0.2 and 1 TeV was observed from the GRB 190114C. Here we
present the results of our multi-frequency observational campaign of
GRB~190114C, and study the evolution in time of the GRB emission across 17
orders of magnitude in energy, from $5\times10^{-6}$ up to $10^{12}$\,eV. We
find that the broadband spectral energy distribution is double-peaked, with the
TeV emission constituting a distinct spectral component that has power
comparable to the synchrotron component. This component is associated with the
afterglow, and is satisfactorily explained by inverse Compton upscattering of
synchrotron photons by high-energy electrons. We find that the conditions
required to account for the observed TeV component are not atypical, supporting
the possibility that inverse Compton emission is commonly produced in GRBs.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.10605 [pdf] - 2050215
Fermi and Swift Observations of GRB 190114C: Tracing the Evolution of
High-Energy Emission from Prompt to Afterglow
Ajello, M.;
Arimoto, M.;
Axelsson, M.;
Baldini, L.;
Barbiellini, G.;
Bastieri, D.;
Bellazzini, R.;
Berretta, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Blandford, R. D.;
Bonino, R.;
Bottacini, E.;
Bregeon, J.;
Bruel, P.;
Buehler, R.;
Burns, E.;
Buson, S.;
Cameron, R. A.;
Caputo, R.;
Caraveo, P. A.;
Cavazzuti, E.;
Chen, S.;
Chiaro, G.;
Ciprini, S.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Costantin, D.;
Cutini, S.;
D'Ammando, F.;
DeKlotz, M.;
Luque, P. de la Torre;
de Palma, F.;
Desai, A.;
Di Lalla, N.;
Di Venere, L.;
Dirirsa, F. Fana;
Fegan, S. J.;
Franckowiak, A.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Fusco, P.;
Gargano, F.;
Gasparrini, D.;
Giglietto, N.;
Gill, R.;
Giordano, F.;
Giroletti, M.;
Granot, J.;
Green, D.;
Grenier, I. A.;
Grondin, M. H.;
Guiriec, S.;
Hays, E.;
Horan, D.;
Jóhannesson, G.;
Kocevski, D.;
Kovac'evic', M.;
Kuss, M.;
Larsson, S.;
Latronico, L.;
Lemoine-Goumard, M.;
Li, J.;
Liodakis, I.;
Longo, F.;
Loparco, F.;
Lovellette, M. N.;
Lubrano, P.;
Maldera, S.;
Malyshev, D.;
Manfreda, A.;
Martí-Devesa, G.;
Mazziotta, M. N.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Mereu, I.;
Meyer, M.;
Michelson, P. F.;
Mitthumsiri, W.;
Mizuno, T.;
Monzani, M. E.;
Moretti, E.;
Morselli, A.;
Moskalenko, I. V.;
Negro, M.;
Nuss, E.;
Omodei, N.;
Orienti, M.;
Orlando, E.;
Palatiello, M.;
Paliya, V. S.;
Paneque, D.;
Pei, Z.;
Persic, M.;
Pesce-Rollins, M.;
Petrosian, V.;
Piron, F.;
Poon, H.;
Porter, T. A.;
Principe, G.;
Racusin, J. L.;
Rainò, S.;
Rando, R.;
Rani, B.;
Razzano, M.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, A.;
Reimer, O.;
Ryde, F.;
Parkinson, P. M. Saz;
Serini, D.;
Sgrò, C.;
Siskind, E. J.;
Spandre, G.;
Spinelli, P.;
Tajima, H.;
Takagi, K.;
Takahashi, M. N.;
Tak, D.;
Thayer, J. B.;
Thompson, D. J.;
Torres, D. F.;
Troja, E.;
Valverde, J.;
Van Klaveren, B.;
Wood, K.;
Yassine, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cleveland, W.;
Giles, M.;
Goldstein, A.;
Hui, M.;
Malacaria, C.;
Preece, R.;
Roberts, O.;
Veres, P.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
O'Brien, P.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Lien, A.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Tohuvavohu, A.;
D'Elia, V.;
D'A, A.;
Perri, M.;
Gropp, J.;
Klingler, N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Stamatikos, M.
Submitted: 2019-09-23, last modified: 2020-01-23
We report on the observations of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 190114C by the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. The
early-time observations reveal multiple emission components that evolve
independently, with a delayed power-law component that exhibits significant
spectral attenuation above 40 MeV in the first few seconds of the burst. This
power-law component transitions to a harder spectrum that is consistent with
the afterglow emission observed at later times. This afterglow component is
clearly identifiable in the GBM and BAT light curves as a slowly fading
emission component on which the rest of the prompt emission is superimposed. As
a result, we are able to constrain the transition from internal shock to
external shock dominated emission. We find that the temporal and spectral
evolution of the broadband afterglow emission can be well modeled as
synchrotron emission from a forward shock propagating into a wind-like
circumstellar environment and find that high-energy photons observed by Fermi
LAT are in tension with the theoretical maximum energy that can be achieved
through synchrotron emission from a shock. These violations of the maximum
synchrotron energy are further compounded by the detection of very high energy
(VHE) emission above 300 GeV by MAGIC concurrent with our observations. We
conclude that the observations of VHE photons from GRB 190114C necessitates
either an additional emission mechanism at very high energies that is hidden in
the synchrotron component in the LAT energy range, an acceleration mechanism
that imparts energy to the particles at a rate that is faster than the electron
synchrotron energy loss rate, or revisions of the fundamental assumptions used
in estimating the maximum photon energy attainable through the synchrotron
process.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.07956 [pdf] - 1818759
The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping
Survey
Edelson, R.;
Gelbord, J.;
Cackett, E.;
Peterson, B. M.;
Horne, K.;
Barth, A. J.;
Starkey, D. A.;
Bentz, M.;
Brandt, W. N.;
Goad, M.;
Joner, M.;
Korista, K.;
Netzer, H.;
Page, K.;
Uttley, P.;
Vaughan, S.;
Breeveld, A.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Done, C.;
Evans, P.;
Fausnaugh, M.;
Ferland, G.;
Gonzalez-Buitrago, D.;
Gropp, J.;
Grupe, D.;
Kaastra, J.;
Kennea, J.;
Kriss, G.;
Mathur, S.;
Mehdipour, M.;
Mudd, D.;
Nousek, J.;
Schmidt, T.;
Vestergaard, M.;
Villforth, C.
Submitted: 2018-11-19, last modified: 2019-01-20
Swift intensive accretion disk reverberation mapping of four AGN yielded
light curves sampled $\sim$200-350 times in 0.3-10 keV X-ray and six UV/optical
bands. Uniform reduction and cross-correlation analysis of these datasets
yields three main results: 1) The X-ray/UV correlations are much weaker than
those within the UV/optical, posing severe problems for the lamp-post
reprocessing model in which variations in a central X-ray corona drive and
power those in the surrounding accretion disk. 2) The UV/optical interband lags
are generally consistent with $ \tau \propto \lambda^{4/3} $ as predicted by
the centrally illuminated thin accretion disk model. While the average
interband lags are somewhat larger than predicted, these results alone are not
inconsistent with the thin disk model given the large systematic uncertainties
involved. 3) The one exception is the U band lags, which are on average a
factor of $\sim$2.2 larger than predicted from the surrounding band data and
fits. This excess appears due to diffuse continuum emission from the broad-line
region (BLR). The precise mixing of disk and BLR components cannot be
determined from these data alone. The lags in different AGN appear to scale
with mass or luminosity. We also find that there are systematic differences
between the uncertainties derived by javelin vs. more standard lag measurement
techniques, with javelin reporting smaller uncertainties by a factor of 2.5 on
average. In order to be conservative only standard techniques were used in the
analyses reported herein.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.08830 [pdf] - 1374234
Kepler Eclipsing Binary Stars. VII. The Catalog of Eclipsing Binaries
Found in the Entire Kepler Data-Set
Kirk, Brian;
Conroy, Kyle;
Prša, Andrej;
Abdul-Masih, Michael;
Kochoska, Angela;
Matijevič, Gal;
Hambleton, Kelly;
Barclay, Thomas;
Bloemen, Steven;
Boyajian, Tabetha;
Doyle, Laurance R.;
Fulton, B. J.;
Hoekstra, Abe Johannes;
Jek, Kian;
Kane, Stephen R.;
Kostov, Veselin;
Latham, David;
Mazeh, Tsevi;
Orosz, Jerome A.;
Pepper, Joshua;
Quarles, Billy;
Ragozzine, Darin;
Shporer, Avi;
Southworth, John;
Stassun, Keivan;
Thompson, Susan E.;
Welsh, William F.;
Agol, Eric;
Derekas, Aliz;
Devor, Jonathan;
Fischer, Debra;
Green, Gregory;
Gropp, Jeff;
Jacobs, Tom;
Johnston, Cole;
LaCourse, Daryll Matthew;
Saetre, Kristian;
Schwengeler, Hans;
Toczyski, Jacek;
Werner, Griffin;
Garrett, Matthew;
Gore, Joanna;
Martinez, Arturo O.;
Spitzer, Isaac;
Stevick, Justin;
Thomadis, Pantelis C.;
Vrijmoet, Eliot Halley;
Yenawine, Mitchell;
Batalha, Natalie;
Borucki, William
Submitted: 2015-12-29
The primary Kepler Mission provided nearly continuous monitoring of ~200,000
objects with unprecedented photometric precision. We present the final catalog
of eclipsing binary systems within the 105 square degree Kepler field of view.
This release incorporates the full extent of the data from the primary mission
(Q0-Q17 Data Release). As a result, new systems have been added, additional
false positives have been removed, ephemerides and principal parameters have
been recomputed, classifications have been revised to rely on analytical
models, and eclipse timing variations have been computed for each system. We
identify several classes of systems including those that exhibit tertiary
eclipse events, systems that show clear evidence of additional bodies,
heartbeat systems, systems with changing eclipse depths, and systems exhibiting
only one eclipse event over the duration of the mission. We have updated the
period and galactic latitude distribution diagrams and included a catalog
completeness evaluation. The total number of identified eclipsing and
ellipsoidal binary systems in the Kepler field of view has increased to 2878,
1.3% of all observed Kepler targets. An online version of this catalog with
downloadable content and visualization tools is maintained at
http://keplerEBs.villanova.edu.