Normalized to: Grobler, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.06041 [pdf] - 2097404
Foreground modelling via Gaussian process regression: an application to
HERA data
Ghosh, Abhik;
Mertens, Florent;
Bernardi, Gianni;
Santos, Mário G.;
Kern, Nicholas S.;
Carilli, Christopher L.;
Grobler, Trienko L.;
Koopmans, Léon V. E.;
Jacobs, Daniel C.;
Liu, Adrian;
Parsons, Aaron R.;
Morales, Miguel F.;
Aguirre, James E.;
Dillon, Joshua S.;
Hazelton, Bryna J.;
Smirnov, Oleg M.;
Gehlot, Bharat K.;
Matika, Siyanda;
Alexander, Paul;
Ali, Zaki S.;
Beardsley, Adam P.;
Benefo, Roshan K.;
Billings, Tashalee S.;
Bowman, Judd D.;
Bradley, Richard F.;
Cheng, Carina;
Chichura, Paul M.;
DeBoer, David R.;
Acedo, Eloy de Lera;
Ewall-Wice, Aaron;
Fadana, Gcobisa;
Fagnoni, Nicolas;
Fortino, Austin F.;
Fritz, Randall;
Furlanetto, Steve R.;
Gallardo, Samavarti;
Glendenning, Brian;
Gorthi, Deepthi;
Greig, Bradley;
Grobbelaar, Jasper;
Hickish, Jack;
Josaitis, Alec;
Julius, Austin;
Igarashi, Amy S.;
Kariseb, MacCalvin;
Kohn, Saul A.;
Kolopanis, Matthew;
Lekalake, Telalo;
Loots, Anita;
MacMahon, David;
Malan, Lourence;
Malgas, Cresshim;
Maree, Matthys;
Martinot, Zachary E.;
Mathison, Nathan;
Matsetela, Eunice;
Mesinger, Andrei;
Neben, Abraham R.;
Nikolic, Bojan;
Nunhokee, Chuneeta D.;
Patra, Nipanjana;
Pieterse, Samantha;
Razavi-Ghods, Nima;
Ringuette, Jon;
Robnett, James;
Rosie, Kathryn;
Sell, Raddwine;
Smith, Craig;
Syce, Angelo;
Tegmark, Max;
Thyagarajan, Nithyanandan;
Williams, Peter K. G.;
Zheng, Haoxuan
Submitted: 2020-04-13, last modified: 2020-05-12
The key challenge in the observation of the redshifted 21-cm signal from
cosmic reionization is its separation from the much brighter foreground
emission. Such separation relies on the different spectral properties of the
two components, although, in real life, the foreground intrinsic spectrum is
often corrupted by the instrumental response, inducing systematic effects that
can further jeopardize the measurement of the 21-cm signal. In this paper, we
use Gaussian Process Regression to model both foreground emission and
instrumental systematics in $\sim 2$ hours of data from the Hydrogen Epoch of
Reionization Array. We find that a simple co-variance model with three
components matches the data well, giving a residual power spectrum with white
noise properties. These consist of an "intrinsic" and instrumentally corrupted
component with a coherence-scale of 20 MHz and 2.4 MHz respectively (dominating
the line of sight power spectrum over scales $k_{\parallel} \le 0.2$ h
cMpc$^{-1}$) and a baseline dependent periodic signal with a period of $\sim 1$
MHz (dominating over $k_{\parallel} \sim 0.4 - 0.8$h cMpc$^{-1}$) which should
be distinguishable from the 21-cm EoR signal whose typical coherence-scales is
$\sim 0.8$ MHz.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.08136 [pdf] - 1982406
Radio Interferometric Calibration Using a Complex Student's
t-distribution and Wirtinger Derivatives
Submitted: 2019-10-17
Radio interferometric gain calibration can be biased by incomplete sky models
and radio frequency interference, resulting in calibration artefacts that can
restrict the dynamic range of the resulting images. It has been suggested that
calibration algorithms employing heavy-tailed likelihood functions are less
susceptible to this due to their robustness against outliers in the data. We
present an algorithm based on a Student's t-distribution which leverages the
framework of complex optimisation and Wirtinger calculus for efficient and
robust interferometric gain calibration. We integrate this algorithm as an
option in the newly released calibration software package, CubiCal. We
demonstrate that the algorithm can mitigate some of the biases introduced by
incomplete sky models and radio frequency interference by applying it to both
simulated and real data. Our results show significant improvements compared to
a conventional least-squares solver which assumes a Gaussian likelihood
function. Furthermore, we provide some insight into why the algorithm
outperforms the conventional solver, and discuss specific scenarios (for both
direction-independent and direction-dependent self-calibration) where this is
expected to be the case.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.03410 [pdf] - 1686901
CubiCal - Fast radio interferometric calibration suite exploiting
complex optimisation
Submitted: 2018-05-09, last modified: 2018-05-15
It has recently been shown that radio interferometric gain calibration can be
expressed succinctly in the language of complex optimisation. In addition to
providing an elegant framework for further development, it exposes properties
of the calibration problem which can be exploited to accelerate traditional
non-linear least squares solvers such as Gauss-Newton and Levenberg-Marquardt.
We extend existing derivations to chains of Jones terms: products of several
gains which model different aberrant effects. In doing so, we find that the
useful properties found in the single term case still hold. We also develop
several specialised solvers which deal with complex gains parameterised by real
values. The newly developed solvers have been implemented in a Python package
called CubiCal, which uses a combination of Cython, multiprocessing and shared
memory to leverage the power of modern hardware. We apply CubiCal to both
simulated and real data, and perform both direction-independent and
direction-dependent self-calibration. Finally, we present the results of some
rudimentary profiling to show that CubiCal is competitive with respect to
existing calibration tools such as MeqTrees.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.01933 [pdf] - 1661346
Revival of the magnetar PSR J1622-4950: observations with MeerKAT,
Parkes, XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and NuSTAR
Camilo, F.;
Scholz, P.;
Serylak, M.;
Buchner, S.;
Merryfield, M.;
Kaspi, V. M.;
Archibald, R. F.;
Bailes, M.;
Jameson, A.;
van Straten, W.;
Sarkissian, J.;
Reynolds, J. E.;
Johnston, S.;
Hobbs, G.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Adam, R. M.;
Adams, G. B.;
Alberts, T.;
Andreas, R.;
Asad, K. M. B.;
Baker, D. E.;
Baloyi, T.;
Bauermeister, E. F.;
Baxana, T.;
Bennett, T. G. H.;
Bernardi, G.;
Booisen, D.;
Booth, R. S.;
Botha, D. H.;
Boyana, L.;
Brederode, L. R. S.;
Burger, J. P.;
Cheetham, T.;
Conradie, J.;
Conradie, J. P.;
Davidson, D. B.;
de Bruin, G.;
de Swardt, B.;
de Villiers, C.;
de Villiers, D. I. L.;
de Villiers, M. S.;
de Villiers, W.;
de Waal, C.;
Dikgale, M. A.;
Toit, G. du;
Toit, L. J. du;
Esterhuyse, S. W. P.;
Fanaroff, B.;
Fataar, S.;
Foley, A. R.;
Foster, G.;
Fourie, D.;
Gamatham, R.;
Gatsi, T.;
Geschke, R.;
Goedhart, S.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Gumede, S. C.;
Hlakola, M. J.;
Hokwana, A.;
Hoorn, D. H.;
Horn, D.;
Horrell, J.;
Hugo, B.;
Isaacson, A.;
Jacobs, O.;
van Rensburg, J. P. Jansen;
Jonas, J. L.;
Jordaan, B.;
Joubert, A.;
Joubert, F.;
Jozsa, G. I. G.;
Julie, R.;
Julius, C. C.;
Kapp, F.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Karels, F.;
Kariseb, M.;
Karuppusamy, R.;
Kasper, V.;
Knox-Davies, E. C.;
Koch, D.;
Kotze, P. P. A.;
Krebs, A.;
Kriek, N.;
Kriel, H.;
Kusel, T.;
Lamoor, S.;
Lehmensiek, R.;
Liebenberg, D.;
Liebenberg, I.;
Lord, R. T.;
Lunsky, B.;
Mabombo, N.;
Macdonald, T.;
Macfarlane, P.;
Madisa, K.;
Mafhungo, L.;
Magnus, L. G.;
Magozore, C.;
Mahgoub, O.;
Main, J. P. L.;
Makhathini, S.;
Malan, J. A.;
Malgas, P.;
Manley, J. R.;
Manzini, M.;
Marais, L.;
Marais, N.;
Marais, S. J.;
Maree, M.;
Martens, A.;
Matshawule, S. D.;
Matthysen, N.;
Mauch, T.;
Nally, L. D. Mc;
Merry, B.;
Millenaar, R. P.;
Mjikelo, C.;
Mkhabela, N.;
Mnyandu, N.;
Moeng, I. T.;
Mokone, O. J.;
Monama, T. E.;
Montshiwa, K.;
Moss, V.;
Mphego, M.;
New, W.;
Ngcebetsha, B.;
Ngoasheng, K.;
Niehaus, H.;
Ntuli, P.;
Nzama, A.;
Obies, F.;
Obrocka, M.;
Ockards, M. T.;
Olyn, C.;
Oozeer, N.;
Otto, A. J.;
Padayachee, Y.;
Passmoor, S.;
Patel, A. A.;
Paula, S.;
Peens-Hough, A.;
Pholoholo, B.;
Prozesky, P.;
Rakoma, S.;
Ramaila, A. J. T.;
Rammala, I.;
Ramudzuli, Z. R.;
Rasivhaga, M.;
Ratcliffe, S.;
Reader, H. C.;
Renil, R.;
Richter, L.;
Robyntjies, A.;
Rosekrans, D.;
Rust, A.;
Salie, S.;
Sambu, N.;
Schollar, C. T. G.;
Schwardt, L.;
Seranyane, S.;
Sethosa, G.;
Sharpe, C.;
Siebrits, R.;
Sirothia, S. K.;
Slabber, M. J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Smith, S.;
Sofeya, L.;
Songqumase, N.;
Spann, R.;
Stappers, B.;
Steyn, D.;
Steyn, T. J.;
Strong, R.;
Struthers, A.;
Stuart, C.;
Sunnylall, P.;
Swart, P. S.;
Taljaard, B.;
Tasse, C.;
Taylor, G.;
Theron, I. P.;
Thondikulam, V.;
Thorat, K.;
Tiplady, A.;
Toruvanda, O.;
van Aardt, J.;
van Balla, T.;
Heever, L. van den;
van der Byl, A.;
van der Merwe, C.;
van der Merwe, P.;
van Niekerk, P. C.;
van Rooyen, R.;
van Staden, J. P.;
van Tonder, V.;
van Wyk, R.;
Wait, I.;
Walker, A. L.;
Wallace, B.;
Welz, M.;
Williams, L. P.;
Xaia, B.;
Young, N.;
Zitha, S.
Submitted: 2018-04-05
New radio (MeerKAT and Parkes) and X-ray (XMM-Newton, Swift, Chandra, and
NuSTAR) observations of PSR J1622-4950 indicate that the magnetar, in a
quiescent state since at least early 2015, reactivated between 2017 March 19
and April 5. The radio flux density, while variable, is approximately 100x
larger than during its dormant state. The X-ray flux one month after
reactivation was at least 800x larger than during quiescence, and has been
decaying exponentially on a 111+/-19 day timescale. This high-flux state,
together with a radio-derived rotational ephemeris, enabled for the first time
the detection of X-ray pulsations for this magnetar. At 5%, the 0.3-6 keV
pulsed fraction is comparable to the smallest observed for magnetars. The
overall pulsar geometry inferred from polarized radio emission appears to be
broadly consistent with that determined 6-8 years earlier. However, rotating
vector model fits suggest that we are now seeing radio emission from a
different location in the magnetosphere than previously. This indicates a novel
way in which radio emission from magnetars can differ from that of ordinary
pulsars. The torque on the neutron star is varying rapidly and unsteadily, as
is common for magnetars following outburst, having changed by a factor of 7
within six months of reactivation.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03249 [pdf] - 1641410
Redundant interferometric calibration as a complex optimization problem
Submitted: 2018-01-10, last modified: 2018-02-09
Observations of the redshifted 21-cm line from the epoch of reionization have
recently motivated the construction of low frequency radio arrays with highly
redundant configurations. These configurations provide an alternative
calibration strategy - "redundant calibration" - and boosts sensitivity on
specific spatial scales. In this paper, we formulate calibration of redundant
interferometric arrays as a complex optimization problem. We solve this
optimization problem via the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. This calibration
approach is more robust to initial conditions than current algorithms and, by
leveraging an approximate matrix inversion, allows for further optimization and
an efficient implementation ("redundant StEfCal"). We also investigated using
the preconditioned conjugate gradient method as an alternative to the
approximate matrix inverse, but found that its computational performance is not
competitive with respect to "redundant StEfCal". The efficient implementation
of this new algorithm is made publicly available.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1707.04109 [pdf] - 1585894
Constraining Polarized Foregrounds for EOR Experiments II: Polarization
Leakage Simulations in the Avoidance Scheme
Nunhokee, C. D.;
Bernardi, G.;
Kohn, S. A.;
Aguirre, J. E.;
Thyagarajan, N.;
Dillon, J. S.;
Foster, G.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Martinot, J. Z. E.;
Parsons, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-07-13, last modified: 2017-09-08
A critical challenge in the observation of the redshifted 21-cm line is its
separation from bright Galactic and extragalactic foregrounds. In particular,
the instrumental leakage of polarized foregrounds, which undergo significant
Faraday rotation as they propagate through the interstellar medium, may
harmfully contaminate the 21-cm power spectrum. We develop a formalism to
describe the leakage due to instrumental widefield effects in visibility-based
power spectra measured with redundant arrays, extending the delay-spectrum
approach presented in Parsons et al. (2012). We construct polarized sky models
and propagate them through the instrument model to simulate realistic full-sky
observations with the Precision Array to Probe the Epoch of Reionization. We
find that the leakage due to a population of polarized point sources is
expected to be higher than diffuse Galactic polarization at any $k$ mode for a
30~m reference baseline. For the same reference baseline, a foreground-free
window at $k > 0.3 \, h$~Mpc$^{-1}$ can be defined in terms of leakage from
diffuse Galactic polarization even under the most pessimistic assumptions. If
measurements of polarized foreground power spectra or a model of polarized
foregrounds are given, our method is able to predict the polarization leakage
in actual 21-cm observations, potentially enabling its statistical subtraction
from the measured 21-cm power spectrum.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.06320 [pdf] - 1444115
Calibration artefacts in radio interferometry. III. Phase-only
calibration and primary beam correction
Submitted: 2016-06-20, last modified: 2016-07-18
This is the third installment in a series of papers in which we investigate
calibration artefacts. Calibration artefacts (also known as ghosts or spurious
sources) are created when we calibrate with an incomplete model. In the first
two papers of this series we developed a mathematical framework which enabled
us to study the ghosting mechanism itself. An interesting concomitant of the
second paper was that ghosts appear in symmetrical pairs. This could possibly
account for spurious symmetrization. Spurious symmetrization refers to the
appearance of a spurious source (the anti-ghost) symmetrically opposite an
unmodelled source around a modelled source. The analysis in the first two
papers indicates that the anti-ghost is usually very faint, in particular when
a large number of antennas are used. This suggests that spurious symmetrization
will mainly occur at an almost undetectable flux level. In this paper, we show
that phase-only calibration produces an anti-ghost that is $N$-times (where $N$
denotes the number of antennas in the array) as bright as the one produced by
phase and amplitude calibration and that this already bright ghost can be
further amplified by the primary beam correction.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.00014 [pdf] - 1425267
LOFAR MSSS: Detection of a low-frequency radio transient in 400 hrs of
monitoring of the North Celestial Pole
Stewart, A. J.;
Fender, R. P.;
Broderick, J. W.;
Hassall, T. E.;
Muñoz-Darias, T.;
Rowlinson, A.;
Swinbank, J. D.;
Staley, T. D.;
Molenaar, G. J.;
Scheers, B.;
Grobler, T. L.;
Pietka, M.;
Heald, G.;
McKean, J. P.;
Bell, M. E.;
Bonafede, A.;
Breton, R. P.;
Carbone, D.;
Cendes, Y.;
Clarke, A. O.;
Corbel, S.;
de Gasperin, F.;
Eislöffel, J.;
Falcke, H.;
Ferrari, C.;
Grießmeier, J. -M.;
Hardcastle, M. J.;
Heesen, V.;
Hessels, J. W. T.;
Horneffer, A.;
Iacobelli, M.;
Jonker, P.;
Karastergiou, A.;
Kokotanekov, G.;
Kondratiev, V. I.;
Kuniyoshi, M.;
Law, C. J.;
van Leeuwen, J.;
Markoff, S.;
Miller-Jones, J. C. A.;
Mulcahy, D.;
Orru, E.;
Pandey-Pommier, M.;
Pratley, L.;
Rol, E.;
Röttgering, H. J. A.;
Scaife, A. M. M.;
Shulevski, A.;
Sobey, C. A.;
Stappers, B. W.;
Tasse, C.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
van Velzen, S.;
van Weeren, R. J.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Wijnands, R.;
Wise, M.;
Zarka, P.;
Alexov, A.;
Anderson, J.;
Asgekar, A.;
Avruch, I. M.;
Bentum, M. J.;
Bernardi, G.;
Best, P.;
Breitling, F.;
Brüggen, M.;
Butcher, H. R.;
Ciardi, B.;
Conway, J. E.;
Corstanje, A.;
de Geus, E.;
Deller, A.;
Duscha, S.;
Frieswijk, W.;
Garrett, M. A.;
Gunst, A. W.;
van Haarlem, M. P.;
Hoeft, M.;
Hörandel, J.;
Juette, E.;
Kuper, G.;
Loose, M.;
Maat, P.;
McFadden, R.;
McKay-Bukowski, D.;
Moldon, J.;
Munk, H.;
Norden, M. J.;
Paas, H.;
Polatidis, A. G.;
Schwarz, D.;
Sluman, J.;
Smirnov, O.;
Steinmetz, M.;
Thoudam, S.;
Toribio, M. C.;
Vermeulen, R.;
Vocks, C.;
Wijnholds, S. J.;
Wucknitz, O.;
Yatawatta, S.
Submitted: 2015-11-30
We present the results of a four-month campaign searching for low-frequency
radio transients near the North Celestial Pole with the Low-Frequency Array
(LOFAR), as part of the Multifrequency Snapshot Sky Survey (MSSS). The data
were recorded between 2011 December and 2012 April and comprised 2149 11-minute
snapshots, each covering 175 deg^2. We have found one convincing candidate
astrophysical transient, with a duration of a few minutes and a flux density at
60 MHz of 15-25 Jy. The transient does not repeat and has no obvious optical or
high-energy counterpart, as a result of which its nature is unclear. The
detection of this event implies a transient rate at 60 MHz of 3.9 (+14.7, -3.7)
x 10^-4 day^-1 deg^-2, and a transient surface density of 1.5 x 10^-5 deg^-2,
at a 7.9-Jy limiting flux density and ~10-minute time-scale. The campaign data
were also searched for transients at a range of other time-scales, from 0.5 to
297 min, which allowed us to place a range of limits on transient rates at 60
MHz as a function of observation duration.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.1373 [pdf] - 812034
Calibration artefacts in radio interferometry. I. Ghost sources in WSRT
data
Submitted: 2014-02-06
This work investigates a particular class of artefacts, or ghost sources, in
radio interferometric images. Earlier observations with (and simulations of)
the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) suggested that these were due
to calibration with incomplete sky models. A theoretical framework is derived
that validates this suggestion, and provides predictions of ghost formation in
a two-source scenario. The predictions are found to accurately match the result
of simulations, and qualitatively reproduce the ghosts previously seen in
observational data. The theory also provides explanations for many previously
puzzling features of these artefacts (regular geometry, PSF-like sidelobes,
seeming independence on model flux), and shows that the observed phenomenon of
flux suppression affecting unmodelled sources is due to the same mechanism. We
demonstrate that this ghost formation mechanism is a fundamental feature of
calibration, and exhibits a particularly strong and localized signature due to
array redundancy. To some extent this mechanism will affect all observations
(including those with non-redundant arrays), though in most cases the ghosts
remain hidden below the noise or masked by other instrumental artefacts. The
implications of such errors on future deep observations are discussed.