Normalized to: Gris, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.09095 [pdf] - 2036930
Peculiar velocity cosmology with type Ia supernovae
Graziani, R.;
Rigault, M.;
Regnault, N.;
Gris, Ph.;
Möller, A.;
Antilogus, P.;
Astier, P.;
Betoule, M.;
Bongard, S.;
Briday, M.;
Cohen-Tanugi, J.;
Copin, Y.;
Courtois, H. M.;
Fouchez, D.;
Gangler, E.;
Guinet, D.;
Hawken, A. J.;
Kim, Y. -L.;
Léget, P. -F.;
Neveu, J.;
Ntelis, P.;
Rosnet, Ph.;
Nuss, E.
Submitted: 2020-01-24
Type Ia Supernovae have yet again the opportunity to revolutionize the field
of cosmology as the new generation of surveys are acquiring thousands of nearby
SNeIa opening a new era in cosmology: the direct measurement of the growth of
structure parametrized by $fD$. This method is based on the SNeIa peculiar
velocities derived from the residual to the Hubble law as direct tracers of the
full gravitational potential caused by large scale structure. With this
technique, we could probe not only the properties of dark energy, but also the
laws of gravity. In this paper we present the analytical framework and
forecasts. We show that ZTF and LSST will be able to reach 5\% precision on
$fD$ by 2027. Our analysis is not significantly sensitive to photo-typing, but
known selection functions and spectroscopic redshifts are mandatory. We finally
introduce an idea of a dedicated spectrograph that would get all the required
information in addition to boost the efficiency to each SNeIa so that we could
reach the 5\% precision within the first two years of LSST operation and the
few percent level by the end of the survey.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.10439 [pdf] - 1871680
Enhancing LSST Science with Euclid Synergy
Capak, P.;
Cuillandre, J-C.;
Bernardeau, F.;
Castander, F.;
Bowler, R.;
Chang, C.;
Grillmair, C.;
Gris, P.;
Eifler, T.;
Hirata, C.;
Hook, I.;
Jain, B.;
Kuijken, K.;
Lochner, M.;
Oesch, P.;
Paltani, S.;
Rhodes, J.;
Robertson, B.;
Rubin, D.;
Scaramella, R.;
Scarlata, C.;
Scolnic, D.;
Silverman, J.;
Wachter, S.;
Wang, Y.;
Group, The Tri-Agency Working
Submitted: 2019-04-23
This white paper is the result of the Tri-Agency Working Group (TAG)
appointed to develop synergies between missions and is intended to clarify what
LSST observations are needed in order to maximally enhance the combined science
output of LSST and Euclid. To facilitate LSST planning we provide a range of
possible LSST surveys with clear metrics based on the improvement in the Dark
Energy figure of merit (FOM). To provide a quantifiable metric we present five
survey options using only between 0.3 and 3.8% of the LSST 10 year survey. We
also provide information so that the LSST DDF cadence can possibly be matched
to those of \emph{Euclid} in common deep fields, SXDS, COSMOS, CDFS, and a
proposed new LSST deep field (near the Akari Deep Field South). Co-coordination
of observations from the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) and Euclid will
lead to a significant number of synergies. The combination of optical
multi-band imaging from LSST with high resolution optical and near-infrared
photometry and spectroscopy from \emph{Euclid} will not only improve
constraints on Dark Energy, but provide a wealth of science on the Milky Way,
local group, local large scale structure, and even on first galaxies during the
epoch of reionization. A detailed paper has been published on the Dark Energy
science case (Rhodes et al.) by a joint LSST/Euclid working group as well as a
white paper describing LSST/Euclid/WFIRST synergies (Jain et al.), and we will
briefly describe other science cases here. A companion white paper argues the
general science case for an extension of the LSST footprint to the north at
airmass < 1.8, and we support the white papers for southern extensions of the
LSST survey.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1904.10438 [pdf] - 1871679
Mini-survey of the northern sky to Dec <+30
Capak, P.;
Sconlic, D.;
Cuillandre, J-C.;
Castander, F.;
Bolton, A.;
Bowler, R.;
Chang, C.;
Dey, A.;
Eifler, T.;
Eisenstein, D.;
Grillmair, C.;
Gris, P.;
Hernitschek, N.;
Hook, I.;
Hirata, C.;
Kuijken, B. Jain K.;
Lochner, M.;
Newman, J.;
Oesch, P.;
Olsen, K.;
Rhodes, J.;
Robertson, B.;
Rubin, D.;
Scarlata, C.;
Silverman, J.;
Wachter, S.;
Wang, Y.;
Group, The Tri-Agency Working
Submitted: 2019-04-23
We propose an extension of the LSST survey to cover the northern sky to DEC <
+30 (accessible at airmass <1.8). This survey will increase the LSST sky
coverage by ~9,600 square degrees from 18,900 to 28,500 square degrees (a 50%
increase) but use only 0.6-2.5% of the time depending on the synergies with
other surveys. This increased area addresses a wide range of science cases that
enhance all of the primary LSST science goals by significant amounts. The
science enabled includes: increasing the area of the sky accessible for
follow-up of multi-messenger transients including gravitational waves, mapping
the milky way halo and halo dwarfs including discovery of RR Lyrae stars in the
outer galactic halo, discovery of z>7 quasars in combination Euclid, enabling a
second generation DESI and other spectroscopic surveys, and enhancing all areas
of science by improving synergies with Euclid, WFIRST, and unique northern
survey facilities. This white paper is the result of the Tri-Agency Working
Group (TAG) appointed to develop synergies between missions and presents a
unified plan for northern coverage. The range of time estimates reflects
synergies with other surveys. If the modified DESC WFD survey, the ecliptic
plane mini survey, and the north galactic spur mini survey are executed this
plan would only need 0.6% of the LSST time, however if none of these are
included the overall request is 2.5% of the 10 year survey life. In other
words, the majority of these observations are already suggested as part of
these other surveys and the intent of this white paper is to propose a unified
baseline plan to carry out a broad range of objectives to facilitate a
combination of multiple science objectives. A companion white paper gives
Euclid specific science goals, and we support the white papers for southern
extensions of the LSST survey.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.00515 [pdf] - 1798318
Optimizing the LSST Observing Strategy for Dark Energy Science: DESC
Recommendations for the Wide-Fast-Deep Survey
Lochner, Michelle;
Scolnic, Daniel M.;
Awan, Humna;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Gris, Philippe;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Gawiser, Eric;
Almoubayyed, Husni;
Setzer, Christian N.;
Huber, Simon;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Hložek, Renée;
Biswas, Rahul;
Eifler, Tim;
Rothchild, Daniel;
Allam, Tarek;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Chang, Chihway;
Collett, Thomas;
Goobar, Ariel;
Hook, Isobel M.;
Jarvis, Mike;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
Kim, Alex G.;
Marshall, Phil;
McEwen, Jason D.;
Moniez, Marc;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Petrushevska, Tanja;
Rhodes, Jason;
Sevilla-Noarbe, Ignacio;
Slosar, Anže;
Suyu, Sherry H.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Yoachim, Peter
Submitted: 2018-11-30, last modified: 2018-12-14
Cosmology is one of the four science pillars of LSST, which promises to be
transformative for our understanding of dark energy and dark matter. The LSST
Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) has been tasked with deriving
constraints on cosmological parameters from LSST data. Each of the cosmological
probes for LSST is heavily impacted by the choice of observing strategy. This
white paper is written by the LSST DESC Observing Strategy Task Force (OSTF),
which represents the entire collaboration, and aims to make recommendations on
observing strategy that will benefit all cosmological analyses with LSST. It is
accompanied by the DESC DDF (Deep Drilling Fields) white paper (Scolnic et
al.). We use a variety of metrics to understand the effects of the observing
strategy on measurements of weak lensing, large-scale structure, clusters,
photometric redshifts, supernovae, strong lensing and kilonovae. In order to
reduce systematic uncertainties, we conclude that the current baseline
observing strategy needs to be significantly modified to result in the best
possible cosmological constraints. We provide some key recommendations: moving
the WFD (Wide-Fast-Deep) footprint to avoid regions of high extinction, taking
visit pairs in different filters, changing the 2x15s snaps to a single exposure
to improve efficiency, focusing on strategies that reduce long gaps (>15 days)
between observations, and prioritizing spatial uniformity at several intervals
during the 10-year survey.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.00516 [pdf] - 1791907
Optimizing the LSST Observing Strategy for Dark Energy Science: DESC
Recommendations for the Deep Drilling Fields and other Special Programs
Scolnic, Daniel M.;
Lochner, Michelle;
Gris, Phillipe;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Hložek, Renée;
Aldering, Greg;
Allam, Tarek;
Awan, Humna;
Biswas, Rahul;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Chang, Chihway;
Gawiser, Eric;
Goobar, Ariel;
Hook, Isobel M.;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
McEwen, Jason D.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Marshall, Phil;
Neilsen, Eric;
Rhodes, Jason;
Rothchild, Daniel;
Noarbe, Ignacio Sevilla;
Slosar, Anže;
Yoachim, Peter
Submitted: 2018-11-30
We review the measurements of dark energy enabled by observations of the Deep
Drilling Fields and the optimization of survey design for cosmological
measurements. This white paper is the result of efforts by the LSST DESC
Observing Strategy Task Force (OSTF), which represents the entire
collaboration, and aims to make recommendations on observing strategy for the
DDFs that will benefit all cosmological analyses with LSST. It is accompanied
by the DESC-WFD white paper (Lochner et al.). We argue for altering the nominal
deep drilling plan to have $>6$ month seasons, interweaving $gri$ and $zy$
observations every 3 days with 2, 4, 8, 25, 4 visits in $grizy$, respectively.
These recommendations are guided by metrics optimizing constraints on dark
energy and mitigation of systematic uncertainties, including specific
requirements on total number of visits after Y1 and Y10 for photometric
redshifts (photo-$z$) and weak lensing systematics. We specify the precise
locations for the previously-chosen LSST deep fields (ELAIS-S1, XMM-LSS, CDF-S,
and COSMOS) and recommend Akari Deep Field South as the planned fifth deep
field in order to synergize with Euclid and WFIRST. Our recommended DDF
strategy uses $6.2\%$ of the LSST survey time. We briefly discuss synergy with
white papers from other collaborations, as well as additional mini-surveys and
Target-of-Opportunity programs that lead to better measurements of dark energy.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.2366 [pdf] - 1934226
LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data
Products
Ivezić, Željko;
Kahn, Steven M.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Abel, Bob;
Acosta, Emily;
Allsman, Robyn;
Alonso, David;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Anderson, Scott F.;
Andrew, John;
Angel, James Roger P.;
Angeli, George Z.;
Ansari, Reza;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Araujo, Constanza;
Armstrong, Robert;
Arndt, Kirk T.;
Astier, Pierre;
Aubourg, Éric;
Auza, Nicole;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Bard, Deborah J.;
Barr, Jeff D.;
Barrau, Aurelian;
Bartlett, James G.;
Bauer, Amanda E.;
Bauman, Brian J.;
Baumont, Sylvain;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Beldica, Cristina;
Bellavia, Steve;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Blanc, Guillaume;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Blandford, Roger D.;
Bloom, Josh S.;
Bogart, Joanne;
Bond, Tim W.;
Borgland, Anders W.;
Borne, Kirk;
Bosch, James F.;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Brackett, Craig A.;
Bradshaw, Andrew;
Brandt, William Nielsen;
Brown, Michael E.;
Bullock, James S.;
Burchat, Patricia;
Burke, David L.;
Cagnoli, Gianpietro;
Calabrese, Daniel;
Callahan, Shawn;
Callen, Alice L.;
Chandrasekharan, Srinivasan;
Charles-Emerson, Glenaver;
Chesley, Steve;
Cheu, Elliott C.;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Chiang, James;
Chirino, Carol;
Chow, Derek;
Ciardi, David R.;
Claver, Charles F.;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Cockrum, Joseph J.;
Coles, Rebecca;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Cook, Kem H.;
Cooray, Asantha;
Covey, Kevin R.;
Cribbs, Chris;
Cui, Wei;
Cutri, Roc;
Daly, Philip N.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daruich, Felipe;
Daubard, Guillaume;
Daues, Greg;
Dawson, William;
Delgado, Francisco;
Dellapenna, Alfred;
de Peyster, Robert;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Digel, Seth W.;
Doherty, Peter;
Dubois, Richard;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory P.;
Durech, Josef;
Economou, Frossie;
Eracleous, Michael;
Ferguson, Henry;
Figueroa, Enrique;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Focke, Warren;
Foss, Michael D.;
Frank, James;
Freemon, Michael D.;
Gangler, Emmanuel;
Gawiser, Eric;
Geary, John C.;
Gee, Perry;
Geha, Marla;
Gessner, Charles J. B.;
Gibson, Robert R.;
Gilmore, D. Kirk;
Glanzman, Thomas;
Glick, William;
Goldina, Tatiana;
Goldstein, Daniel A.;
Goodenow, Iain;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Gressler, William J.;
Gris, Philippe;
Guy, Leanne P.;
Guyonnet, Augustin;
Haller, Gunther;
Harris, Ron;
Hascall, Patrick A.;
Haupt, Justine;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Herrmann, Sven;
Hileman, Edward;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Hodgson, John A.;
Hogan, Craig;
Huang, Dajun;
Huffer, Michael E.;
Ingraham, Patrick;
Innes, Walter R.;
Jacoby, Suzanne H.;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jee, James;
Jenness, Tim;
Jernigan, Garrett;
Jevremović, Darko;
Johns, Kenneth;
Johnson, Anthony S.;
Johnson, Margaret W. G.;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Juramy-Gilles, Claire;
Jurić, Mario;
Kalirai, Jason S.;
Kallivayalil, Nitya J.;
Kalmbach, Bryce;
Kantor, Jeffrey P.;
Karst, Pierre;
Kasliwal, Mansi M.;
Kelly, Heather;
Kessler, Richard;
Kinnison, Veronica;
Kirkby, David;
Knox, Lloyd;
Kotov, Ivan V.;
Krabbendam, Victor L.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Kubánek, Petr;
Kuczewski, John;
Kulkarni, Shri;
Ku, John;
Kurita, Nadine R.;
Lage, Craig S.;
Lambert, Ron;
Lange, Travis;
Langton, J. Brian;
Guillou, Laurent Le;
Levine, Deborah;
Liang, Ming;
Lim, Kian-Tat;
Lintott, Chris J.;
Long, Kevin E.;
Lopez, Margaux;
Lotz, Paul J.;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Lust, Nate B.;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Marsh, Darren S.;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Marshall, Stuart;
May, Morgan;
McKercher, Robert;
McQueen, Michelle;
Meyers, Joshua;
Migliore, Myriam;
Miller, Michelle;
Mills, David J.;
Miraval, Connor;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Monet, David G.;
Moniez, Marc;
Monkewitz, Serge;
Montgomery, Christopher;
Mueller, Fritz;
Muller, Gary P.;
Arancibia, Freddy Muñoz;
Neill, Douglas R.;
Newbry, Scott P.;
Nief, Jean-Yves;
Nomerotski, Andrei;
Nordby, Martin;
O'Connor, Paul;
Oliver, John;
Olivier, Scot S.;
Olsen, Knut;
O'Mullane, William;
Ortiz, Sandra;
Osier, Shawn;
Owen, Russell E.;
Pain, Reynald;
Palecek, Paul E.;
Parejko, John K.;
Parsons, James B.;
Pease, Nathan M.;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Peterson, John R.;
Petravick, Donald L.;
Petrick, M. E. Libby;
Petry, Cathy E.;
Pierfederici, Francesco;
Pietrowicz, Stephen;
Pike, Rob;
Pinto, Philip A.;
Plante, Raymond;
Plate, Stephen;
Price, Paul A.;
Prouza, Michael;
Radeka, Veljko;
Rajagopal, Jayadev;
Rasmussen, Andrew P.;
Regnault, Nicolas;
Reil, Kevin A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Reuter, Michael A.;
Ridgway, Stephen T.;
Riot, Vincent J.;
Ritz, Steve;
Robinson, Sean;
Roby, William;
Roodman, Aaron;
Rosing, Wayne;
Roucelle, Cecille;
Rumore, Matthew R.;
Russo, Stefano;
Saha, Abhijit;
Sassolas, Benoit;
Schalk, Terry L.;
Schellart, Pim;
Schindler, Rafe H.;
Schmidt, Samuel;
Schneider, Donald P.;
Schneider, Michael D.;
Schoening, William;
Schumacher, German;
Schwamb, Megan E.;
Sebag, Jacques;
Selvy, Brian;
Sembroski, Glenn H.;
Seppala, Lynn G.;
Serio, Andrew;
Serrano, Eduardo;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Shipsey, Ian;
Sick, Jonathan;
Silvestri, Nicole;
Slater, Colin T.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, R. Chris;
Sobhani, Shahram;
Soldahl, Christine;
Storrie-Lombardi, Lisa;
Stover, Edward;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Street, Rachel A.;
Stubbs, Christopher W.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Sweeney, Donald;
Swinbank, John D.;
Szalay, Alexander;
Takacs, Peter;
Tether, Stephen A.;
Thaler, Jon J.;
Thayer, John Gregg;
Thomas, Sandrine;
Thukral, Vaikunth;
Tice, Jeffrey;
Trilling, David E.;
Turri, Max;
Van Berg, Richard;
Berk, Daniel Vanden;
Vetter, Kurt;
Virieux, Francoise;
Vucina, Tomislav;
Wahl, William;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Walsh, Brian;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Daniel L.;
Wang, Shin-Yawn;
Warner, Michael;
Wiecha, Oliver;
Willman, Beth;
Winters, Scott E.;
Wittman, David;
Wolff, Sidney C.;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Wu, Xiuqin;
Xin, Bo;
Yoachim, Peter;
Zhan, Hu
Submitted: 2008-05-15, last modified: 2018-05-23
(Abridged) We describe here the most ambitious survey currently planned in
the optical, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). A vast array of
science will be enabled by a single wide-deep-fast sky survey, and LSST will
have unique survey capability in the faint time domain. The LSST design is
driven by four main science themes: probing dark energy and dark matter, taking
an inventory of the Solar System, exploring the transient optical sky, and
mapping the Milky Way. LSST will be a wide-field ground-based system sited at
Cerro Pach\'{o}n in northern Chile. The telescope will have an 8.4 m (6.5 m
effective) primary mirror, a 9.6 deg$^2$ field of view, and a 3.2 Gigapixel
camera. The standard observing sequence will consist of pairs of 15-second
exposures in a given field, with two such visits in each pointing in a given
night. With these repeats, the LSST system is capable of imaging about 10,000
square degrees of sky in a single filter in three nights. The typical 5$\sigma$
point-source depth in a single visit in $r$ will be $\sim 24.5$ (AB). The
project is in the construction phase and will begin regular survey operations
by 2022. The survey area will be contained within 30,000 deg$^2$ with
$\delta<+34.5^\circ$, and will be imaged multiple times in six bands, $ugrizy$,
covering the wavelength range 320--1050 nm. About 90\% of the observing time
will be devoted to a deep-wide-fast survey mode which will uniformly observe a
18,000 deg$^2$ region about 800 times (summed over all six bands) during the
anticipated 10 years of operations, and yield a coadded map to $r\sim27.5$. The
remaining 10\% of the observing time will be allocated to projects such as a
Very Deep and Fast time domain survey. The goal is to make LSST data products,
including a relational database of about 32 trillion observations of 40 billion
objects, available to the public and scientists around the world.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.03418 [pdf] - 1724933
Correcting for peculiar velocities of Type Ia Supernovae in clusters of
galaxies
Léget, P. -F.;
Pruzhinskaya, M. V.;
Ciulli, A.;
Gangler, E.;
Aldering, G.;
Antilogus, P.;
Aragon, C.;
Bailey, S.;
Baltay, C.;
Barbary, K.;
Bongard, S.;
Boone, K.;
Buton, C.;
Childress, M.;
Chotard, N.;
Copin, Y.;
Dixon, S.;
Fagrelius, P.;
Feindt, U.;
Fouchez, D.;
Gris, P.;
Hayden, B.;
Hillebrandt, W.;
Howell, D. A.;
Kim, A.;
Kowalski, M.;
Kuesters, D.;
Lombardo, S.;
Lin, Q.;
Nordin, J.;
Pain, R.;
Pecontal, E.;
Pereira, R.;
Perlmutter, S.;
Rabinowitz, D.;
Rigault, M.;
Runge, K.;
Rubin, D.;
Saunders, C.;
Says, L. -P.;
Smadja, G.;
Sofiatti, C.;
Suzuki, N.;
Taubenberger, S.;
Tao, C.;
Thomas, R. C.
Submitted: 2018-04-10
Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) are widely used to measure the expansion of the
Universe. To perform such measurements the luminosity and cosmological redshift
($z$) of the SNe Ia have to be determined. The uncertainty on $z$ includes an
unknown peculiar velocity, which can be very large for SNe Ia in the virialized
cores of massive clusters. We determine which SNe Ia exploded in galaxy
clusters. We then study how the correction for peculiar velocities of host
galaxies inside the clusters improves the Hubble residuals. Using 145 SNe Ia
from the Nearby Supernova Factory we found 11 candidates for membership in
clusters. To estimate the redshift of a cluster we applied the bi-weight
technique. Then, we use the galaxy cluster redshift instead of the host galaxy
redshift to construct the Hubble diagram. For SNe Ia inside galaxy clusters the
dispersion around the Hubble diagram when peculiar velocities are taken into
account is smaller in comparison with a case without peculiar velocity
correction, with a $wRMS=0.130\pm0.038$ mag instead of $wRMS=0.137\pm0.036$
mag. The significance of this improvement is 3.58 $\sigma$. If we remove the
very nearby Virgo cluster member SN2006X ($z<0.01$) from the analysis, the
significance decreases to 1.34 $\sigma$. The peculiar velocity correction is
found to be highest for the SNe Ia hosted by blue spiral galaxies, with high
local specific star formation rate and smaller stellar mass, seemingly counter
to what might be expected given the heavy concentration of old, massive
elliptical galaxies in clusters. As expected, the Hubble residuals of SNe Ia
associated with massive galaxy clusters improve when the cluster redshift is
taken as the cosmological redshift of the SN. This fact has to be taken into
account in future cosmological analyses in order to achieve higher accuracy for
cosmological redshift measurements. Here we provide an approach to do so.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.04058 [pdf] - 1587069
Science-Driven Optimization of the LSST Observing Strategy
LSST Science Collaboration;
Marshall, Phil;
Anguita, Timo;
Bianco, Federica B.;
Bellm, Eric C.;
Brandt, Niel;
Clarkson, Will;
Connolly, Andy;
Gawiser, Eric;
Ivezic, Zeljko;
Jones, Lynne;
Lochner, Michelle;
Lund, Michael B.;
Mahabal, Ashish;
Nidever, David;
Olsen, Knut;
Ridgway, Stephen;
Rhodes, Jason;
Shemmer, Ohad;
Trilling, David;
Vivas, Kathy;
Walkowicz, Lucianne;
Willman, Beth;
Yoachim, Peter;
Anderson, Scott;
Antilogus, Pierre;
Angus, Ruth;
Arcavi, Iair;
Awan, Humna;
Biswas, Rahul;
Bell, Keaton J.;
Bennett, David;
Britt, Chris;
Buzasi, Derek;
Casetti-Dinescu, Dana I.;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Claver, Chuck;
Cook, Kem;
Davenport, James;
Debattista, Victor;
Digel, Seth;
Doctor, Zoheyr;
Firth, R. E.;
Foley, Ryan;
Fong, Wen-fai;
Galbany, Lluis;
Giampapa, Mark;
Gizis, John E.;
Graham, Melissa L.;
Grillmair, Carl;
Gris, Phillipe;
Haiman, Zoltan;
Hartigan, Patrick;
Hawley, Suzanne;
Hlozek, Renee;
Jha, Saurabh W.;
Johns-Krull, C.;
Kanbur, Shashi;
Kalogera, Vassiliki;
Kashyap, Vinay;
Kasliwal, Vishal;
Kessler, Richard;
Kim, Alex;
Kurczynski, Peter;
Lahav, Ofer;
Liu, Michael C.;
Malz, Alex;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Matheson, Tom;
McEwen, Jason D.;
McGehee, Peregrine;
Meibom, Soren;
Meyers, Josh;
Monet, Dave;
Neilsen, Eric;
Newman, Jeffrey;
O'Dowd, Matt;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Penny, Matthew T.;
Peters, Christina;
Poleski, Radoslaw;
Ponder, Kara;
Richards, Gordon;
Rho, Jeonghee;
Rubin, David;
Schmidt, Samuel;
Schuhmann, Robert L.;
Shporer, Avi;
Slater, Colin;
Smith, Nathan;
Soares-Santos, Marcelles;
Stassun, Keivan;
Strader, Jay;
Strauss, Michael;
Street, Rachel;
Stubbs, Christopher;
Sullivan, Mark;
Szkody, Paula;
Trimble, Virginia;
Tyson, Tony;
de Val-Borro, Miguel;
Valenti, Stefano;
Wagoner, Robert;
Wood-Vasey, W. Michael;
Zauderer, Bevin Ashley
Submitted: 2017-08-14
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope is designed to provide an unprecedented
optical imaging dataset that will support investigations of our Solar System,
Galaxy and Universe, across half the sky and over ten years of repeated
observation. However, exactly how the LSST observations will be taken (the
observing strategy or "cadence") is not yet finalized. In this
dynamically-evolving community white paper, we explore how the detailed
performance of the anticipated science investigations is expected to depend on
small changes to the LSST observing strategy. Using realistic simulations of
the LSST schedule and observation properties, we design and compute diagnostic
metrics and Figures of Merit that provide quantitative evaluations of different
observing strategies, analyzing their impact on a wide range of proposed
science projects. This is work in progress: we are using this white paper to
communicate to each other the relative merits of the observing strategy choices
that could be made, in an effort to maximize the scientific value of the
survey. The investigation of some science cases leads to suggestions for new
strategies that could be simulated and potentially adopted. Notably, we find
motivation for exploring departures from a spatially uniform annual tiling of
the sky: focusing instead on different parts of the survey area in different
years in a "rolling cadence" is likely to have significant benefits for a
number of time domain and moving object astronomy projects. The communal
assembly of a suite of quantified and homogeneously coded metrics is the vital
first step towards an automated, systematic, science-based assessment of any
given cadence simulation, that will enable the scheduling of the LSST to be as
well-informed as possible.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.03674 [pdf] - 1463464
The influence of host galaxy morphology on the properties of Type Ia
supernovae from the JLA compilation
Submitted: 2016-08-12
The observational cosmology with distant Type Ia supernovae (SNe) as standard
candles claims that the Universe is in accelerated expansion, caused by a large
fraction of dark energy. In this paper we investigate the SN Ia environment,
studying the impact of the nature of their host galaxies on the Hubble diagram
fitting. The supernovae (192 SNe) used in the analysis were extracted from
Joint-Light-curves-Analysis (JLA) compilation of high-redshift and nearby
supernovae which is the best one to date. The analysis is based on the
empirical fact that SN Ia luminosities depend on their light curve shapes and
colors. We confirm that the stretch parameter of Type Ia supernovae is
correlated with the host galaxy type. The supernovae with lower stretch are
hosted mainly in elliptical and lenticular galaxies. No significant correlation
between SN Ia colour and host morphology was found.
We also examine how the luminosities of SNe Ia change depending on host
galaxy morphology after stretch and colour corrections. Our results show that
in old stellar populations and low dust environments, the supernovae are
slightly fainter. SNe Ia in elliptical and lenticular galaxies have a higher
$\alpha$ (slope in luminosity-stretch) and $\beta$ (slope in luminosity-colour)
parameter than in spirals. However, the observed shift is at the 1-$\sigma$
uncertainty level and, therefore, can not be considered as significant.
We confirm that the supernova properties depend on their environment and that
the incorporation of a host galaxy term into the Hubble diagram fit is expected
to be crucial for future cosmological analyses.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.07914 [pdf] - 1938162
The LSST Data Management System
Jurić, Mario;
Kantor, Jeffrey;
Lim, K-T;
Lupton, Robert H.;
Dubois-Felsmann, Gregory;
Jenness, Tim;
Axelrod, Tim S.;
Aleksić, Jovan;
Allsman, Roberta A.;
AlSayyad, Yusra;
Alt, Jason;
Armstrong, Robert;
Basney, Jim;
Becker, Andrew C.;
Becla, Jacek;
Bickerton, Steven J.;
Biswas, Rahul;
Bosch, James;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Kind, Matias Carrasco;
Ciardi, David R.;
Connolly, Andrew J.;
Daniel, Scott F.;
Daues, Gregory E.;
Economou, Frossie;
Chiang, Hsin-Fang;
Fausti, Angelo;
Fisher-Levine, Merlin;
Freemon, D. Michael;
Gee, Perry;
Gris, Philippe;
Hernandez, Fabio;
Hoblitt, Joshua;
Ivezić, Željko;
Jammes, Fabrice;
Jevremović, Darko;
Jones, R. Lynne;
Kalmbach, J. Bryce;
Kasliwal, Vishal P.;
Krughoff, K. Simon;
Lang, Dustin;
Lurie, John;
Lust, Nate B.;
Mullally, Fergal;
MacArthur, Lauren A.;
Melchior, Peter;
Moeyens, Joachim;
Nidever, David L.;
Owen, Russell;
Parejko, John K;
Peterson, J. Matt;
Petravick, Donald;
Pietrowicz, Stephen R.;
Price, Paul A.;
Reiss, David J.;
Shaw, Richard A.;
Sick, Jonathan;
Slater, Colin T.;
Strauss, Michael A.;
Sullivan, Ian S.;
Swinbank, John D.;
Van Dyk, Schuyler;
Vujčić, Veljko;
Withers, Alexander;
Yoachim, Peter
Submitted: 2015-12-24
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) is a large-aperture, wide-field,
ground-based survey system that will image the sky in six optical bands from
320 to 1050 nm, uniformly covering approximately $18,000$deg$^2$ of the sky
over 800 times. The LSST is currently under construction on Cerro Pach\'on in
Chile, and expected to enter operations in 2022. Once operational, the LSST
will explore a wide range of astrophysical questions, from discovering "killer"
asteroids to examining the nature of Dark Energy.
The LSST will generate on average 15 TB of data per night, and will require a
comprehensive Data Management system to reduce the raw data to scientifically
useful catalogs and images with minimum human intervention. These reductions
will result in a real-time alert stream, and eleven data releases over the
10-year duration of LSST operations. To enable this processing, the LSST
project is developing a new, general-purpose, high-performance, scalable, well
documented, open source data processing software stack for O/IR surveys.
Prototypes of this stack are already capable of processing data from existing
cameras (e.g., SDSS, DECam, MegaCam), and form the basis of the Hyper-Suprime
Cam (HSC) Survey data reduction pipeline.