Normalized to: Grinspoon, D.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.00105 [pdf] - 2126332
The Venus Life Equation
Submitted: 2020-06-30
Ancient Venus and Earth may have been similar in crucial ways for the
development of life, such as liquid water oceans, land-ocean interfaces, the
favorable chemical ingredients and energy pathways. If life ever developed on,
or was transported to, early Venus from elsewhere, it might have thrived,
expanded and survived the changes that have led an inhospitable surface on
Venus today. Today the Venus cloud layer may provide a refugium for extant
life. We introduce the Venus Life equation: a theory- and evidence-based
approach to calculate the probability of extant life on Venus, L, using three
primary factors of life: Origination, Robustness, and Continuity. We evaluate
each of these factors using our current understanding of Earth and Venus
environmental conditions from the Archean to the present. We find that
probability of origination of life on Venus is similar to that of the Earth and
argue that the other factors are nonzero, yielding a probability of extant life
of Venus of 0.1 or less. The Venus Life Equation identifies poorly understood
factors that can be addressed by direct observations with future exploration
missions.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.02783 [pdf] - 1979667
Venus as a Laboratory for Exoplanetary Science
Kane, Stephen R.;
Arney, Giada;
Crisp, David;
Domagal-Goldman2, Shawn;
Glaze, Lori S.;
Goldblatt, Colin;
Grinspoon, David;
Head, James W.;
Lenardic, Adrian;
Unterborn, Cayman;
Way, Michael J.;
Zahnle, Kevin J.
Submitted: 2019-08-07, last modified: 2019-08-26
The current goals of the astrobiology community are focused on developing a
framework for the detection of biosignatures, or evidence thereof, on objects
inside and outside of our solar system. A fundamental aspect of understanding
the limits of habitable environments (surface liquid water) and detectable
signatures thereof is the study of where the boundaries of such environments
can occur. Such studies provide the basis for understanding how a once
inhabitable planet might come to be uninhabitable. The archetype of such a
planet is arguably Earth's sibling planet, Venus. Given the need to define the
conditions that can rule out biorelated signatures of exoplanets, Venus
provides a unique opportunity to explore the processes that led to a completely
uninhabitable environment by our current definition of the term. Here we review
the current state of knowledge regarding Venus, particularly in the context of
remote sensing techniques that are being or will be employed in the search for
and characterization of exoplanets. We discuss candidate Venus analogs
identified by the Kepler and TESS exoplanet missions and provide an update to
exoplanet demographics that can be placed in the potential runaway greenhouse
regime where Venus analogs are thought to reside. We list several major
outstanding questions regarding the Venus environment and the relevance of
those questions to understanding the atmospheres and interior structure of
exoplanets. Finally, we outline the path towards a deeper analysis of our
sibling planet and the synergy to exoplanetary science.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.00589 [pdf] - 1927520
Astro2020 APC White Paper: Findings and Recommendations from the AAS
Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy: Towards Eliminating Harassment
in Astronomy
Zellner, Nicolle;
McBride, JoEllen;
Morrison, Nancy;
Olmstead, Alice;
Patterson, Maria;
Rudnick, Gregory;
Venkatesan, Aparna;
Flewelling, Heather;
Grinspoon, David;
Mink, Jessica D.;
Richey, Christina;
Speck, Angela;
Thomas, Cristina A.;
Tuttle, Sarah E.
Submitted: 2019-08-01
The Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy (CSWA) is calling on
federal science funding agencies, in their role as the largest sources of
funding for astronomy in the United States, to take actions that will end
harassment, particularly sexual harassment, in astronomical workplaces. Funding
agencies can and should lead the charge to end harassment in astronomy by the
2030 Astrophysics Decadal Survey. Anecdotal and quantitative evidence, gathered
both by the CSWA and other groups, shows that harassment is prevalent and
damaging for women and minority astronomers and those in related fields.
Actions recommended herein will increase the rate of reporting of harassment to
agencies and improve their ability to investigate and take action against
harassers. We also recommend that agencies participate in harassment prevention
by creating and implementing the best anti-harassment education possible.
Key recommendations are:
- Federal agencies should improve their ethics policies by making harassment
a form of scientific misconduct.
- Federal agencies should mandate that institutions report to them when a
funded Principal Investigator (PI) or co-Principal Investigator (co-PI) is
found to be a perpetrator of harassment.
- Federal funding agencies should provide online guides to help scientists
identify harassment and connect them to the right resources for making
confidential or official reports.
- Federal agencies should create and ensure the implementation of
anti-harassment trainings by making them a requirement of receiving grant
funding.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.00597 [pdf] - 1927521
Astro2020 APC White Paper: Findings and Recommendations from the AAS
Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy: Advancing the Career
Development of Women in Astronomy
Zellner, Nicolle;
McBride, JoEllen;
Morrison, Nancy;
Olmstead, Alice;
Patterson, Maria;
Rudnick, Gregory;
Venkatesan, Aparna;
Flewelling, Heather;
Grinspoon, David;
Mink, Jessica D.;
Richey, Christina;
Speck, Angela;
Thomas, Cristina A.;
Tuttle, Sarah E.
Submitted: 2019-08-01
The Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy (CSWA) is calling on
federal science funding agencies, in their role as the largest sources of
funding for astronomy in the United States, to take actions that will advance
career development and improve workplace conditions for women and minorities in
astronomy. Funding agencies can and should lead the charge to produce excellent
diversity and inclusion outcomes in our field by the 2030 Astrophysics Decadal
Survey. Anecdotal and quantitative evidence, gathered both by the CSWA and
other groups, shows that many structural barriers to success remain in our
community. We acknowledge the success of programs like NSF-INCLUDES and
NSF-ADVANCE and endorse their continued work. We also recommend further action
to remove barriers to success for women and minority astronomers.
Key recommendations are:
- Federal agencies should push academic institutions to reconsider their
support systems for scientists by requiring a high standard of pay and
benefits.
- Federal agencies should fund research and programs that explore and
implement strategies for improving the experiences of scientists.
- Federal agencies should require Principal Investigators (PIs) to provide
plans for creating inclusive work environments and mentoring young scientists.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.00706 [pdf] - 1483475
Was Venus the First Habitable World of our Solar System?
Submitted: 2016-08-02
Present-day Venus is an inhospitable place with surface temperatures
approaching 750K and an atmosphere over 90 times as thick as present day
Earth's. Billions of years ago the picture may have been very different. We
have created a suite of 3D climate simulations using topographic data from the
Magellan mission, solar spectral irradiance estimates for 2.9 and 0.715 billion
years ago, present day Venus orbital parameters, an ocean volume consistent
with current theory and measurements, and an atmospheric composition estimated
for early Venus. Using these parameters we find that such a world could have
had moderate temperatures if Venus had a rotation period slower than about 16
Earth days, despite an incident solar flux 46-70% higher than modern Earth
receives. At its current rotation period of 243 days, Venus's climate could
have remained habitable until at least 715 million years ago if it hosted a
shallow primordial ocean. These results demonstrate the vital role that
rotation and topography play in understanding the climatic history of
exoplanetary Venus-like worlds being discovered in the present epoch.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609799 [pdf] - 85391
A Re-appraisal of the Habitability of Planets Around M Dwarf Stars
Tarter, Jill C.;
Backus, Peter R.;
Mancinelli, Rocco L.;
Aurnou, Jonathan M.;
Backman, Dana E.;
Basri, Gibor S.;
Boss, Alan P.;
Clarke, Andrew;
Deming, Drake;
Doyle, Laurance R.;
Feigelson, Eric D.;
Freund, Friedmann;
Grinspoon, David H.;
Haberle, Robert M.;
Hauck, Steven A.;
Heath, Martin J.;
Henry, Todd J.;
Hollingsworth, Jeffery L.;
Joshi, Manoj M.;
Kilston, Steven;
Liu, Michael C.;
Meikle, Eric;
Reid, I. Neill;
Rothschild, Lynn J.;
Scalo, John M.;
Segura, Antigona;
Tang, Carol M.;
Tiedje, James M.;
Turnbull, Margaret C.;
Walkowicz, Lucianne M.;
Weber, Arthur L.;
Young, Richard E.
Submitted: 2006-09-28, last modified: 2006-11-20
Stable, hydrogen-burning, M dwarf stars comprise about 75% of all stars in
the Galaxy. They are extremely long-lived and because they are much smaller in
mass than the Sun (between 0.5 and 0.08 MSun), their temperature and stellar
luminosity are low and peaked in the red. We have re-examined what is known at
present about the potential for a terrestrial planet forming within, or
migrating into, the classic liquid-surface-water habitable zone close to an M
dwarf star. Observations of protoplanetary disks suggest that planet-building
materials are common around M dwarfs, but N-body simulations differ in their
estimations of the likelihood of potentially-habitable, wet planets residing
within their habitable zones, which are only ~ 1/5 to 1/50 of the width of that
for a G star. Particularly in light of the claimed detection of the planets
with masses as small as 5.5 and 7.5 MEarth orbiting M stars, there seems no
reason to exclude the possibility of terrestrial planets. Tidally locked
synchronous rotation within the narrow habitable zone doesn't necessarily lead
to atmospheric collapse, and active stellar flaring may not be as much of an
evolutionarily disadvantageous factor as has previously been supposed. We
conclude that M dwarf stars may indeed be viable hosts for planets on which the
origin and evolution of life can occur. A number of planetary processes such as
cessation of geothermal activity, or thermal and non-thermal atmospheric loss
processes may limit the duration of planetary habitability to periods far
shorter than the extreme lifetime of the M dwarf star. Nevertheless, it makes
sense to include M dwarf stars in programs that seek to find habitable worlds
and evidence of life.