Normalized to: Grichener, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1909.06328 [pdf] - 1967096
Towards a paradigm change in the main heavy r-process nucleosynthesis
sites
Submitted: 2019-09-13, last modified: 2019-09-24
We study the basic properties of three possible r-process scenarios (sites)
and compare them to recent observations and theoretical simulations. We find
that the common envelope jets supernova (CEJSN) r-process scenario can account
for the different observations of r-process nucleosynthesis, including the
presence of r-process-rich low-metalicity stars in ultra-faint dwarf (UFD)
galaxies. The neutron star (NS)-NS merger scenario and the collapsar scenario
encounter some difficulties. Despite that, we conclude that it is very likely
that more than one r-process scenario exists, with a significant contribution
by the CEJSN r-process scenario. We give a prescription to include this
scenario in population synthesis studies of the r-process.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.03889 [pdf] - 1901749
The common envelope jets supernova (CEJSN) r-process scenario
Submitted: 2018-10-09, last modified: 2019-05-05
We study r-process feasibility inside jets launched by a cold neutron star
(NS) spiralling-in inside the core of a giant star, and find that such common
envelope jets supernova events might be a significant source of heavy r-process
elements in the early Universe. We run the stellar evolution code MESA to
follow the evolution of low metalicity giant stars that swallow NSs during
their late expansion phases and find that in some of the cases the NSs
penetrate the core. The Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton (BHL) mass accretion rate onto a
NS as it spirals-in inside the core is sufficiently high to obtain a neutron
rich ejecta as required for the heavy r-process where the second and third
r-process elements are synthesized. Due to the small radius of the NS the
accretion is through an accretion disk and the outflow is in jets (or bipolar
disk winds). The r-process nucleosynthesis takes place inside the jets. To
account for the r-process abundances in the Galaxy we require that one in ten
cases of a NS entering the envelope of a giant star ends as a CEJSN r-process
event.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.11106 [pdf] - 1830530
Diversity of common envelope jets supernovae and the fast transient
AT2018cow
Submitted: 2018-11-27, last modified: 2019-02-04
We propose a common-envelope jets supernova (CEJSN) scenario for the
fast-rising blue optical transient AT2018cow. In a CEJSN a neutron star (NS)
spirals-in inside the extended envelope of a massive giant star and enters the
core. The NS accretes mass from the core through an accretion disc and launches
jets. These jets explode the core and the envelope. In the specific polar CEJSN
scenario that we propose here the jets clear the polar regions of the giant
star before the NS enters the core. The jets that the NS launches after it
enters the core expand almost freely along the polar directions that contain a
small amount of mass. This, we suggest, explains the fast rise to maximum and
the fast ejecta observed at early times of the enigmatic transient AT2018cow.
The slower later time ejecta is the more massive equatorial outflow. We roughly
estimate the accretion phase onto the NS during the explosion phase to last for
a time of about 1000 seconds, during which the average mass accretion rate is
about 0.0001 Mo/sec. We outline the possible diversity of CEJSNe by listing
five other scenarios in addition to the polar CEJSN scenario.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1805.08543 [pdf] - 1732691
Radiating the hydrogen recombination energy during common envelope
evolution
Submitted: 2018-05-22, last modified: 2018-07-31
By using the stellar evolution code MESA we show that most of the hydrogen
recombination energy that is released as the envelope expands during a regular
common envelope evolution (CEE), namely, the initial dynamical phase or
plunge-in phase, is radiated, and hence increases substantially the stellar
luminosity. Only about ten per cent of the hydrogen recombination energy might
be used to remove the envelope. We show that the key property of energy
transport is that when convection becomes inefficient in the outer parts of the
envelope, where the ionization degree of hydrogen falls below about 30 per
cent, photon diffusion becomes very efficient and removes the recombination
energy. The expanding envelope absorbs most of the gravitational energy that is
released by the spiraling-in process of the secondary star inside the common
envelope, and so it is the hydrogen recombination energy that is behind most of
the luminosity increase of the system. The recombination energy of hydrogen
adds only a small fraction of the energy required to remove the common
envelope, and hence does not play a significant role in the ejection of the
envelope.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.05864 [pdf] - 1682614
The limited role of recombination energy in common envelope removal
Submitted: 2018-03-15, last modified: 2018-05-02
We calculate the outward energy transport time by convection and photon
diffusion in an inflated common envelope and find this time to be shorter than
the envelope expansion time. We conclude therefore that most of the hydrogen
recombination energy ends in radiation rather than in kinetic energy of the
outflowing envelope. We use the stellar evolution code MESA and inject energy
inside the envelope of an asymptotic giant branch star to mimic energy
deposition by a spiraling-in stellar companion. During 1.7 years the envelope
expands by a factor of more than 2. Along the entire evolution the convection
can carry the energy very efficiently outwards, to the radius where radiative
transfer becomes more efficient. The total energy transport time stays within
several months, shorter than the dynamical time of the envelope. Had we
included rapid mass loss, as is expected in the common envelope evolution, the
energy transport time would have been even shorter. It seems that calculations
that assume that most of the recombination energy ends in the outflowing gas
might be inaccurate.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1706.00003 [pdf] - 1584102
The imprints of the last jets in core collapse supernovae
Submitted: 2017-05-31, last modified: 2017-08-17
We analyze the morphologies of three core collapse supernova remnants
(CCSNRs) and the energy of jets in other CCSNRs and in Super Luminous
Supernovae (SLSNe) of type Ib/Ic/IIb, and conclude that these properties are
well explained by the last jets' episode as expected in the jet feedback
explosion mechanism of core collapse supernovae (CCSNe). The presence of two
opposite protrusions, termed ears, and our comparison of the CCSNR morphologies
with morphologies of planetary nebulae strengthen the claim that jets play a
major role in the explosion mechanism of CCSNe. We crudely estimate the energy
that was required to inflate the ears in two CCSNRs, and assume that the ears
were inflated by jets. We find that the energies of the jets that inflated ears
in 11 CCSNRs span a range that is similar to that of jets in some energetic
CCSNe (SLSNe), and that this energy, only of the last jets' episode, is much
less than the explosion energy. This finding is compatible with the jet
feedback explosion mechanism of CCSNe, where only the last jets, that carry a
small fraction of the total energy carried by earlier jets, are expected to
influence the outer parts of the ejecta. We reiterate our call for a paradigm
shift from neutrino-driven to jet-driven explosion models of CCSNe.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1610.09647 [pdf] - 1561032
Core collapse supernova remnants with ears
Submitted: 2016-10-30, last modified: 2017-02-28
We study the morphologies of core collapse supernova remnants (CCSNRs) and
find that about third of CCSNRs in our sample have two opposite `ears'
protruding from their main shell. We assume that the ears are formed by jets,
and argue that these properties are compatible with the expectation from the
explosion jet feedback mechanism (JFM). Based on previous studies of ears in
CCSNRs and the similarity of some ears to those found in planetary nebulae, we
assume that the ears are inflated by jets that are launched during the
explosion, or a short time after it. Under simple geometrical assumptions we
find that the extra kinetic energy of the ears is in the range of 1 to 10
percents of the explosion energy. As not all of the kinetic energy of the jets
ends in the ears, we estimate that the typical kinetic energy in the jets that
inflated the ears, under our assumptions, is about 5 to 15 percents of the
explosion energy. This study supports a serious consideration of jet-driven
core-collapse supernova mechanisms.