Normalized to: Gow, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.01068 [pdf] - 1612084
Importance of charge capture in inter-phase regions during readout of
charge-coupled devices
Submitted: 2018-01-03
The current understanding of charge transfer dynamics in Charge-Coupled
Devices (CCDs) is that charge is moved so quickly from one phase to the next in
a clocking sequence and with a density so low that trapping of charge in the
inter-phase regions is negligible. However, new simulation capabilities
developed at the Centre for Electronic Imaging, that includes direct input of
electron density simulations, has made it possible to investigate this
assumption further. As part of the radiation testing campaign of the Euclid
CCD273 devices, data has been obtained using the trap pumping method, that can
be used to identify and characterise single defects CCDs. Combining this data
with simulations, we find that trapping during the transfer of charge between
phases is indeed necessary in order to explain the results of the data
analysis. This result could influence not only trap pumping theory and how trap
pumping should be performed, but also how a radiation damaged CCD is read out
in the most optimal way.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.10958 [pdf] - 1590454
Comparing simulations and test data of a radiation damaged charge-couple
device for the Euclid mission
Submitted: 2017-10-30
The VIS instrument on board the Euclid mission is a weak-lensing experiment
that depends on very precise shape measurements of distant galaxies obtained by
a large CCD array. Due to the harsh radiative environment outside the Earth's
atmosphere, it is anticipated that the CCDs over the mission lifetime will be
degraded to an extent that these measurements will only be possible through the
correction of radiation damage effects. We have therefore created a Monte Carlo
model that simulates the physical processes taking place when transferring
signal through a radiation-damaged CCD. The software is based on
Shockley-Read-Hall theory, and is made to mimic the physical properties in the
CCD as closely as possible. The code runs on a single electrode level and takes
three dimensional trap position, potential structure of the pixel, and
multi-level clocking into account. A key element of the model is that it also
takes device specific simulations of electron density as a direct input,
thereby avoiding to make any analytical assumptions about the size and density
of the charge cloud. This paper illustrates how test data and simulated data
can be compared in order to further our understanding of the positions and
properties of the individual radiation-induced traps.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.08603 [pdf] - 1470924
VIS: the visible imager for Euclid
Cropper, Mark;
Pottinger, S.;
Niemi, S.;
Azzollini, R.;
Denniston, J.;
Szafraniec, M.;
Awan, S.;
Mellier, Y.;
Berthe, M.;
Martignac, J.;
Cara, C.;
di Giorgio, A. -M.;
Sciortino, A.;
Bozzo, E.;
Genolet, L.;
Cole, R.;
Philippon, A.;
Hailey, M.;
Hunt, T.;
Swindells, I.;
Holland, A.;
Gow, J.;
Murray, N.;
Hall, D.;
Skottfelt, J.;
Amiaux, J.;
Laureijs, R.;
Racca, G.;
Salvignol, J. -C.;
Short, A.;
Alvarez, J. Lorenzo;
Kitching, T.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Massey, R.;
Israel, H.;
collaboration, the Euclid
Submitted: 2016-08-30
Euclid-VIS is the large format visible imager for the ESA Euclid space
mission in their Cosmic Vision program, scheduled for launch in 2020. Together
with the near infrared imaging within the NISP instrument, it forms the basis
of the weak lensing measurements of Euclid. VIS will image in a single r+i+z
band from 550-900 nm over a field of view of ~0.5 deg2. By combining 4
exposures with a total of 2260 sec, VIS will reach to deeper than mAB=24.5
(10sigma) for sources with extent ~0.3 arcsec. The image sampling is 0.1
arcsec. VIS will provide deep imaging with a tightly controlled and stable
point spread function (PSF) over a wide survey area of 15000 deg2 to measure
the cosmic shear from nearly 1.5 billion galaxies to high levels of accuracy,
from which the cosmological parameters will be measured. In addition, VIS will
also provide a legacy dataset with an unprecedented combination of spatial
resolution, depth and area covering most of the extra-Galactic sky. Here we
will present the results of the study carried out by the Euclid Consortium
during the period up to the Critical Design Review.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.01761 [pdf] - 1337487
Technology advancement of the CCD201-20 EMCCD for the WFIRST coronagraph
instrument: sensor characterization and radiation damage
Harding, Leon K.;
Demers, Richard T.;
Hoenk, Michael;
Peddada, Pavani;
Nemati, Bijan;
Cherng, Michael;
Michaels, Darren;
Neat, Leo S.;
Loc, Anthony;
Bush, Nathan;
Hall, David;
Murray, Neil;
Gow, Jason;
Burgon, Ross;
Holland, Andrew;
Reinheimer, Alice;
Jorden, Paul R.;
Jordand, Douglas
Submitted: 2016-01-07
The Wide Field InfraRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Asset
(WFIRST-AFTA) mission is a 2.4-m class space telescope that will be used across
a swath of astrophysical research domains. JPL will provide a high-contrast
imaging coronagraph instrument - one of two major astronomical instruments. In
order to achieve the low noise performance required to detect planets under
extremely low flux conditions, the electron multiplying charge-coupled device
(EMCCD) has been baselined for both of the coronagraph's sensors - the imaging
camera and integral field spectrograph. JPL has established an EMCCD test
laboratory in order to advance EMCCD maturity to technology readiness level-6.
This plan incorporates full sensor characterization, including read noise, dark
current, and clock-induced charge. In addition, by considering the unique
challenges of the WFIRST space environment, degradation to the sensor's charge
transfer efficiency will be assessed, as a result of damage from high-energy
particles such as protons, electrons, and cosmic rays. Science-grade CCD201-20
EMCCDs have been irradiated to a proton fluence that reflects the projected
WFIRST orbit. Performance degradation due to radiation displacement damage is
reported, which is the first such study for a CCD201-20 that replicates the
WFIRST conditions. In addition, techniques intended to identify and mitigate
radiation-induced electron trapping, such as trap pumping, custom clocking, and
thermal cycling, are discussed.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.09046 [pdf] - 1286168
Simulating charge transport to understand the spectral response of Swept
Charge Devices
Submitted: 2015-09-30
Swept Charge Devices (SCD) are novel X-ray detectors optimized for improved
spectral performance without any demand for active cooling. The Chandrayaan-1
X-ray Spectrometer (C1XS) experiment onboard the Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft used
an array of SCDs to map the global surface elemental abundances on the Moon
using the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) technique. The successful demonstration of
SCDs in C1XS spurred an enhanced version of the spectrometer on Chandrayaan-2
using the next-generation SCD sensors.
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate validation of a physical model
developed to simulate X-ray photon interaction and charge transportation in a
SCD. The model helps to understand and identify the origin of individual
components that collectively contribute to the energy-dependent spectral
response of the SCD. Furthermore, the model provides completeness to various
calibration tasks, such as generating spectral response matrices (RMFs -
redistribution matrix files), estimating efficiency, optimizing event selection
logic, and maximizing event recovery to improve photon-collection efficiency in
SCDs.
We compare simulation results of the SCD CCD54 with measurements obtained
during the ground calibration of C1XS and clearly demonstrate that our model
reproduces all the major spectral features seen in calibration data. We also
describe our understanding of interactions at different layers of SCD that
contribute to the observed spectrum. Using simulation results, we identify the
origin of different spectral features and quantify their contributions.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.07831 [pdf] - 1265746
How well can Charge Transfer Inefficiency be corrected? A parameter
sensitivity study for iterative correction
Israel, Holger;
Massey, Richard;
Prod'homme, Thibaut;
Cropper, Mark;
Cordes, Oliver;
Gow, Jason;
Kohley, Ralf;
Marggraf, Ole;
Niemi, Sami;
Rhodes, Jason;
Short, Alex;
Verhoeve, Peter
Submitted: 2015-06-25
Radiation damage to space-based Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) detectors creates
defects which result in an increasing Charge Transfer Inefficiency (CTI) that
causes spurious image trailing. Most of the trailing can be corrected during
post-processing, by modelling the charge trapping and moving electrons back to
where they belong. However, such correction is not perfect -- and damage is
continuing to accumulate in orbit. To aid future development, we quantify the
limitations of current approaches, and determine where imperfect knowledge of
model parameters most degrade measurements of photometry and morphology. As a
concrete application, we simulate $1.5\times10^{9}$ "worst case" galaxy and
$1.5\times10^{8}$ star images to test the performance of the Euclid visual
instrument detectors. There are two separable challenges: If the model used to
correct CTI is perfectly the same as that used to add CTI, $99.68$ % of
spurious ellipticity is corrected in our setup. This is because readout noise
is not subject to CTI, but gets over-corrected during correction. Second, if we
assume the first issue to be solved, knowledge of the charge trap density
within $\Delta\rho/\rho\!=\!(0.0272\pm0.0005)$ %, and the characteristic
release time of the dominant species to be known within
$\Delta\tau/\tau\!=\!(0.0400\pm0.0004)$ % will be required. This work presents
the next level of definition of in-orbit CTI calibration procedures for Euclid.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.7312 [pdf] - 583033
Modeling charge transport in Swept Charge Devices for X-ray spectroscopy
Submitted: 2012-10-27, last modified: 2012-10-30
We present the formulation of an analytical model which simulates charge
transport in Swept Charge Devices (SCDs) to understand the nature of the
spectral redistribution function (SRF). We attempt to construct the
energy-dependent and position dependent SRF by modeling the photon interaction,
charge cloud generation and various loss mechanisms viz., recombination,
partial charge collection and split events. The model will help in optimizing
event selection, maximize event recovery and improve spectral modeling for
Chandrayaan-2 (slated for launch in 2014). A proto-type physical model is
developed and the algorithm along with its results are discussed in this paper.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1208.3369 [pdf] - 1150725
VIS: the visible imager for Euclid
Cropper, Mark;
Cole, R.;
James, A.;
Mellier, Y.;
Martignac, J.;
di Giorgio, A. -M.;
Paltani, S.;
Genolet, L.;
Fourmond, J. -J.;
Cara, C.;
Amiaux, J.;
Guttridge, P.;
Walton, D.;
Thomas, P.;
Rees, K.;
Pool, P.;
Endicott, J.;
Holland, A.;
Gow, J.;
Murray, N.;
Duvet, L.;
Augueres, J. -L.;
Laureijs, R.;
Gondoin, P.;
Kitching, T.;
Massey, R.;
Hoekstra, H.;
collaboration, the Euclid
Submitted: 2012-08-16
Euclid-VIS is a large format visible imager for the ESA Euclid space mission
in their Cosmic Vision program, scheduled for launch in 2019. Together with the
near infrared imaging within the NISP instrument it forms the basis of the weak
lensing measurements of Euclid. VIS will image in a single r+i+z band from
550-900 nm over a field of view of ~0.5 deg2. By combining 4 exposures with a
total of 2240 sec, VIS will reach to V=24.5 (10{\sigma}) for sources with
extent ~0.3 arcsec. The image sampling is 0.1 arcsec. VIS will provide deep
imaging with a tightly controlled and stable point spread function (PSF) over a
wide survey area of 15000 deg2 to measure the cosmic shear from nearly 1.5
billion galaxies to high levels of accuracy, from which the cosmological
parameters will be measured. In addition, VIS will also provide a legacy
imaging dataset with an unprecedented combination of spatial resolution, depth
and area covering most of the extra-Galactic sky. Here we will present the
results of the study carried out by the Euclid Consortium during the Euclid
Definition phase.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.3193 [pdf] - 429544
Euclid Definition Study Report
Laureijs, R.;
Amiaux, J.;
Arduini, S.;
Auguères, J. -L.;
Brinchmann, J.;
Cole, R.;
Cropper, M.;
Dabin, C.;
Duvet, L.;
Ealet, A.;
Garilli, B.;
Gondoin, P.;
Guzzo, L.;
Hoar, J.;
Hoekstra, H.;
Holmes, R.;
Kitching, T.;
Maciaszek, T.;
Mellier, Y.;
Pasian, F.;
Percival, W.;
Rhodes, J.;
Criado, G. Saavedra;
Sauvage, M.;
Scaramella, R.;
Valenziano, L.;
Warren, S.;
Bender, R.;
Castander, F.;
Cimatti, A.;
Fèvre, O. Le;
Kurki-Suonio, H.;
Levi, M.;
Lilje, P.;
Meylan, G.;
Nichol, R.;
Pedersen, K.;
Popa, V.;
Lopez, R. Rebolo;
Rix, H. -W.;
Rottgering, H.;
Zeilinger, W.;
Grupp, F.;
Hudelot, P.;
Massey, R.;
Meneghetti, M.;
Miller, L.;
Paltani, S.;
Paulin-Henriksson, S.;
Pires, S.;
Saxton, C.;
Schrabback, T.;
Seidel, G.;
Walsh, J.;
Aghanim, N.;
Amendola, L.;
Bartlett, J.;
Baccigalupi, C.;
Beaulieu, J. -P.;
Benabed, K.;
Cuby, J. -G.;
Elbaz, D.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gavazzi, G.;
Helmi, A.;
Hook, I.;
Irwin, M.;
Kneib, J. -P.;
Kunz, M.;
Mannucci, F.;
Moscardini, L.;
Tao, C.;
Teyssier, R.;
Weller, J.;
Zamorani, G.;
Osorio, M. R. Zapatero;
Boulade, O.;
Foumond, J. J.;
Di Giorgio, A.;
Guttridge, P.;
James, A.;
Kemp, M.;
Martignac, J.;
Spencer, A.;
Walton, D.;
Blümchen, T.;
Bonoli, C.;
Bortoletto, F.;
Cerna, C.;
Corcione, L.;
Fabron, C.;
Jahnke, K.;
Ligori, S.;
Madrid, F.;
Martin, L.;
Morgante, G.;
Pamplona, T.;
Prieto, E.;
Riva, M.;
Toledo, R.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Zerbi, F.;
Abdalla, F.;
Douspis, M.;
Grenet, C.;
Borgani, S.;
Bouwens, R.;
Courbin, F.;
Delouis, J. -M.;
Dubath, P.;
Fontana, A.;
Frailis, M.;
Grazian, A.;
Koppenhöfer, J.;
Mansutti, O.;
Melchior, M.;
Mignoli, M.;
Mohr, J.;
Neissner, C.;
Noddle, K.;
Poncet, M.;
Scodeggio, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Shane, N.;
Starck, J. -L.;
Surace, C.;
Taylor, A.;
Verdoes-Kleijn, G.;
Vuerli, C.;
Williams, O. R.;
Zacchei, A.;
Altieri, B.;
Sanz, I. Escudero;
Kohley, R.;
Oosterbroek, T.;
Astier, P.;
Bacon, D.;
Bardelli, S.;
Baugh, C.;
Bellagamba, F.;
Benoist, C.;
Bianchi, D.;
Biviano, A.;
Branchini, E.;
Carbone, C.;
Cardone, V.;
Clements, D.;
Colombi, S.;
Conselice, C.;
Cresci, G.;
Deacon, N.;
Dunlop, J.;
Fedeli, C.;
Fontanot, F.;
Franzetti, P.;
Giocoli, C.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gow, J.;
Heavens, A.;
Hewett, P.;
Heymans, C.;
Holland, A.;
Huang, Z.;
Ilbert, O.;
Joachimi, B.;
Jennins, E.;
Kerins, E.;
Kiessling, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kotak, R.;
Krause, O.;
Lahav, O.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Lesgourgues, J.;
Lombardi, M.;
Magliocchetti, M.;
Maguire, K.;
Majerotto, E.;
Maoli, R.;
Marulli, F.;
Maurogordato, S.;
McCracken, H.;
McLure, R.;
Melchiorri, A.;
Merson, A.;
Moresco, M.;
Nonino, M.;
Norberg, P.;
Peacock, J.;
Pello, R.;
Penny, M.;
Pettorino, V.;
Di Porto, C.;
Pozzetti, L.;
Quercellini, C.;
Radovich, M.;
Rassat, A.;
Roche, N.;
Ronayette, S.;
Rossetti, E.;
Sartoris, B.;
Schneider, P.;
Semboloni, E.;
Serjeant, S.;
Simpson, F.;
Skordis, C.;
Smadja, G.;
Smartt, S.;
Spano, P.;
Spiro, S.;
Sullivan, M.;
Tilquin, A.;
Trotta, R.;
Verde, L.;
Wang, Y.;
Williger, G.;
Zhao, G.;
Zoubian, J.;
Zucca, E.
Submitted: 2011-10-14
Euclid is a space-based survey mission from the European Space Agency
designed to understand the origin of the Universe's accelerating expansion. It
will use cosmological probes to investigate the nature of dark energy, dark
matter and gravity by tracking their observational signatures on the geometry
of the universe and on the cosmic history of structure formation. The mission
is optimised for two independent primary cosmological probes: Weak
gravitational Lensing (WL) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). The Euclid
payload consists of a 1.2 m Korsch telescope designed to provide a large field
of view. It carries two instruments with a common field-of-view of ~0.54 deg2:
the visual imager (VIS) and the near infrared instrument (NISP) which contains
a slitless spectrometer and a three bands photometer. The Euclid wide survey
will cover 15,000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky and is complemented by two 20
deg2 deep fields. For WL, Euclid measures the shapes of 30-40 resolved galaxies
per arcmin2 in one broad visible R+I+Z band (550-920 nm). The photometric
redshifts for these galaxies reach a precision of dz/(1+z) < 0.05. They are
derived from three additional Euclid NIR bands (Y, J, H in the range 0.92-2.0
micron), complemented by ground based photometry in visible bands derived from
public data or through engaged collaborations. The BAO are determined from a
spectroscopic survey with a redshift accuracy dz/(1+z) =0.001. The slitless
spectrometer, with spectral resolution ~250, predominantly detects Ha emission
line galaxies. Euclid is a Medium Class mission of the ESA Cosmic Vision
2015-2025 programme, with a foreseen launch date in 2019. This report (also
known as the Euclid Red Book) describes the outcome of the Phase A study.