Normalized to: Gordon, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.11043 [pdf] - 1935550
The Simulation of the Sensitivity of the Antarctic Impulsive Transient
Antenna (ANITA) to Askaryan Radiation from Cosmogenic Neutrinos Interacting
in the Antarctic Ice
Cremonesi, L.;
Connolly, A.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C. C.;
Chen, C. H.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J. W. H.;
Gorham, P. W.;
Hill, B.;
Huang, J. J.;
Hughes, K.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Lin, S. Y.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A. B.;
Macchiarulo, L.;
Matsuno, S.;
McBride, K.;
Miki, C.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Oberla, E.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Robert, J. M.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J. W.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Shiao, J.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Stuhr, J.;
Sutherland, M.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wang, S. H.;
Wissel, S. A.
Submitted: 2019-03-26, last modified: 2019-08-12
A Monte Carlo simulation program for the radio detection of Ultra High Energy
(UHE) neutrino interactions in the Antarctic ice as viewed by the Antarctic
Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) is described in this article. The program,
icemc, provides an input spectrum of UHE neutrinos, the parametrization of the
Askaryan radiation generated by their interaction in the ice, and the
propagation of the radiation through ice and air to a simulated model of the
third and fourth ANITA flights. This paper provides an overview of the icemc
simulation, descriptions of the physics models used and of the ANITA
electronics processing chain, data/simulation comparisons to validate the
predicted performance, and a summary of the impact of published results.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.04005 [pdf] - 1901807
Constraints on the ultra-high energy cosmic neutrino flux from the
fourth flight of ANITA
Gorham, P. W.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C. C.;
Chen, C. H.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J. W. H.;
Hast, C.;
Hill, B.;
Hsu, S. Y.;
Huang, J. J.;
Hughes, K.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A. B.;
Macchiarulo, L.;
Matsuno, S.;
Miki, C.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Naudet, C.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Oberla, E.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Roberts, J. M.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J. W.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Shiao, J.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wang, N.;
Wang, S. H.;
Wissel, S. A.
Submitted: 2019-02-11
The ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) NASA long-duration balloon
payload completed its fourth flight in December 2016, after 28 days of flight
time. ANITA is sensitive to impulsive broadband radio emission from
interactions of ultra-high-energy neutrinos in polar ice (Askaryan emission).
We present the results of two separate blind analyses searching for signals
from Askaryan emission in the data from the fourth flight of ANITA. The more
sensitive analysis, with a better expected limit, has a background estimate of
$0.64^{+0.69}_{-0.45}$ and an analysis efficiency of $82\pm2\%$. The second
analysis has a background estimate of $0.34^{+0.66}_{-0.16}$ and an analysis
efficiency of $71\pm6\%$. Each analysis found one event in the signal region,
consistent with the background estimate for each analysis. The resulting limit
further tightens the constraints on the diffuse flux of ultra-high-energy
neutrinos at energies above $10^{19.5}$ eV.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1811.07261 [pdf] - 1855656
A comprehensive analysis of anomalous ANITA events disfavors a diffuse
tau-neutrino flux origin
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Wissel, S. A.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Carvalho, W. R.;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Zas, E.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C. C.;
Chen, C. H.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J. W. H.;
Gorham, P. W.;
Hast, C.;
Hill, B.;
Hsu, S. Y.;
Huang, J. J.;
Hughes, K.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A. B.;
Macchiarulo, L.;
Matsuno, S.;
Miki, C.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Naudet, C.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Oberla, E.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Roberts, J. M.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J. W.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Shiao, J.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wang, S. H.
Submitted: 2018-11-17, last modified: 2019-02-05
Recently, the ANITA collaboration reported on two upward-going extensive air
shower events consistent with a primary particle that emerges from the surface
of the ice. These events may be of $\nu_\tau$ origin, in which the neutrino
interacts within the Earth to produce a $\tau$ lepton that emerges from the
Earth, decays in the atmosphere, and initiates an extensive air shower. In this
paper we estimate an upper bound on the ANITA acceptance to a diffuse
$\nu_\tau$ flux detected via $\tau$-lepton-induced air showers within the
bounds of Standard Model (SM) uncertainties. By comparing this estimate with
the acceptance of Pierre Auger Observatory and IceCube and assuming SM
interactions, we conclude that a $\nu_\tau$ origin of these events would imply
a neutrino flux at least two orders of magnitude above current bounds.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1810.00439 [pdf] - 1758799
Upward-Pointing Cosmic-Ray-like Events Observed with ANITA
Romero-Wolf, Andres;
Gorham, P. W.;
Nam, J.;
Hoover, S.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
DuVernois, M. A.;
Field, R. C.;
Fox, B. D.;
Goldstein, D.;
Gordon, J.;
Hast, C.;
Hebert, C. L.;
Hill, B.;
Hughes, K.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Javaid, A.;
Kowalski, J.;
Lam, J.;
Ludwig, A.;
Learned, J. G.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Link, J. T.;
Lusczek, E.;
Matsuno, S.;
Mercurio, B. C.;
Miki, C.;
Miocinovic, P.;
Mottram, M.;
Mulrey, K.;
Naudet, C. J.;
Ng, J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Palladino, K.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Reil, K.;
Roberts, J.;
Rosen, M.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J.;
Ruckman, L.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Tatem, K.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Walz, D.;
Wissel, S. A.;
Wu, F.;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Carvalho, W.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Zas, E.
Submitted: 2018-09-30
These proceedings address a recent publication by the ANITA collaboration of
four upward- pointing cosmic-ray-like events observed in the first flight of
ANITA. Three of these events were consistent with stratospheric cosmic-ray air
showers where the axis of propagation does not inter- sect the surface of the
Earth. The fourth event was consistent with a primary particle that emerges
from the surface of the ice suggesting a possible {\tau}-lepton decay as the
origin of this event. These proceedings follow-up on the modeling and testing
of the hypothesis that this event was of {\tau} neutrino origin.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.02719 [pdf] - 1712907
Constraints on the diffuse high-energy neutrino flux from the third
flight of ANITA
Gorham, P. W.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C. C.;
Chen, C. H.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J. W. H.;
Hast, C.;
Hill, B.;
Hsu, S. Y.;
Huang, J. J.;
Hughes, K.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A. B.;
Macchiarulo, L.;
Matsuno, S.;
Miki, C.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Naudet, C.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Oberla, E.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Roberts, J. M.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J. W.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Shiao, J.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wang, S. H.;
Wissel, S. A.
Submitted: 2018-03-07, last modified: 2018-06-18
The Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA), a NASA long-duration
balloon payload, searches for radio emission from interactions of
ultra-high-energy neutrinos in polar ice. The third flight of ANITA (ANITA-III)
was launched in December 2014 and completed a 22-day flight. We present the
results of three analyses searching for Askaryan radio emission of neutrino
origin. In the most sensitive of the analyses, we find one event in the signal
region on an expected a priori background of $0.7^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$. Though
consistent with the background estimate, the candidate event remains compatible
with a neutrino hypothesis even after additional post-unblinding scrutiny.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1803.05088 [pdf] - 1771509
Observation of an Unusual Upward-going Cosmic-ray-like Event in the
Third Flight of ANITA
Gorham, P. W.;
Rotter, B.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C. C.;
Chen, C. H.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J. W. H.;
Hast, C.;
Hill, B.;
Hughes, K.;
Huang, J. J.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Javaid, A.;
Lam, J.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Lin, S. Y.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A.;
Macchiarulo, L.;
Matsuno, S.;
Miki, C.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Naudet, C. J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Oberla, E.;
Olmedo, M.;
Prechelt, R.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Roberts, J. M.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Russell, J. W.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Shiao, J.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wang, S. H.;
Wissel, S. A.
Submitted: 2018-03-13
We report on an upward traveling, radio-detected cosmic-ray-like impulsive
event with characteristics closely matching an extensive air shower. This
event, observed in the third flight of the Antarctic Impulsive Transient
Antenna (ANITA), a NASA-sponsored long-duration balloon payload, is consistent
with a similar event reported in a previous flight. These events may be
produced by the atmospheric decay of an upward-propagating $\tau$-lepton
produced by a $\nu_{\tau}$ interaction, although their relatively steep arrival
angles create tension with the standard model (SM) neutrino cross section. Each
of the two events have $a~posteriori$ background estimates of $\lesssim
10^{-2}$ events. If these are generated by $\tau$-lepton decay, then either the
charged-current $\nu_{\tau}$ cross section is suppressed at EeV energies, or
the events arise at moments when the peak flux of a transient neutrino source
was much larger than the typical expected cosmogenic background neutrinos.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.08909 [pdf] - 1747857
Antarctic Surface Reflectivity Calculations and Measurements from the
ANITA-4 and HiCal-2 Experiments
Prohira, S.;
Novikov, A.;
Dasgupta, P.;
Jain, P.;
Nande, S.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Batten, L.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J.;
Gorham, P. W.;
Hast, C.;
Hill, B.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Lam, J.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A.;
Matsuno, S.;
Miki, C.;
Mottram, M.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Oberla, E.;
Ratzlaff, K.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Tatem, K.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wissel, S. A.;
Wu, F.;
Young, R.
Submitted: 2018-01-26
The balloon-borne HiCal radio-frequency (RF) transmitter, in concert with the
ANITA radio-frequency receiver array, is designed to measure the Antarctic
surface reflectivity in the RF wavelength regime. The amplitude of
surface-reflected transmissions from HiCal, registered as triggered events by
ANITA, can be compared with the direct transmissions preceding them by O(10)
microseconds, to infer the surface power reflection coefficient $\cal{R}$. The
first HiCal mission (HiCal-1, Jan. 2015) yielded a sample of 100 such pairs,
resulting in estimates of $\cal{R}$ at highly-glancing angles (i.e., zenith
angles approaching $90^\circ$), with measured reflectivity for those events
which exceeded extant calculations. The HiCal-2 experiment, flying from Dec.,
2016-Jan., 2017, provided an improvement by nearly two orders of magnitude in
our event statistics, allowing a considerably more precise mapping of the
reflectivity over a wider range of incidence angles. We find general agreement
between the HiCal-2 reflectivity results and those obtained with the earlier
HiCal-1 mission, as well as estimates from Solar reflections in the
radio-frequency regime. In parallel, our calculations of expected reflectivity
have matured; herein, we use a plane-wave expansion to estimate the
reflectivity R from both a flat, smooth surface (and, in so doing, recover the
Fresnel reflectivity equations) and also a curved surface. Multiplying our
flat-smooth reflectivity by improved Earth curvature and surface roughness
corrections now provides significantly better agreement between theory and the
HiCal 2a/2b measurements.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.06193 [pdf] - 1581988
Muon Counting using Silicon Photomultipliers in the AMIGA detector of
the Pierre Auger Observatory
The Pierre Auger Collaboration;
Aab, A.;
Abreu, P.;
Aglietta, M.;
Ahn, E. J.;
Samarai, I. Al;
Albuquerque, I. F. M.;
Allekotte, I.;
Allison, P.;
Almela, A.;
Castillo, J. Alvarez;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Anastasi, G. A.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Andrada, B.;
Andringa, S.;
Aramo, C.;
Arqueros, F.;
Arsene, N.;
Asorey, H.;
Assis, P.;
Aublin, J.;
Avila, G.;
Badescu, A. M.;
Balaceanu, A.;
Baus, C.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, K. H.;
Bellido, J. A.;
Berat, C.;
Bertaina, M. E.;
Bertou, X.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Billoir, P.;
Biteau, J.;
Blaess, S. G.;
Blanco, A.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleve, C.;
Boháčová, M.;
Boncioli, D.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Borodai, N.;
Botti, A. M.;
Brack, J.;
Brancus, I.;
Bretz, T.;
Bridgeman, A.;
Briechle, F. L.;
Buchholz, P.;
Bueno, A.;
Buitink, S.;
Buscemi, M.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Caccianiga, B.;
Caccianiga, L.;
Cancio, A.;
Canfora, F.;
Caramete, L.;
Caruso, R.;
Castellina, A.;
Cataldi, G.;
Cazon, L.;
Cester, R.;
Chavez, A. G.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Chinellato, J. A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Clay, R. W.;
Colalillo, R.;
Coleman, A.;
Collica, L.;
Coluccia, M. R.;
Conceição, R.;
Contreras, F.;
Cooper, M. J.;
Coutu, S.;
Covault, C. E.;
Cronin, J.;
Dallier, R.;
D'Amico, S.;
Daniel, B.;
Dasso, S.;
Daumiller, K.;
Dawson, B. R.;
de Almeida, R. M.;
de Jong, S. J.;
De Mauro, G.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
De Mitri, I.;
de Oliveira, J.;
de Souza, V.;
Debatin, J.;
del Peral, L.;
Deligny, O.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Di Matteo, A.;
Castro, M. L. Díaz;
Diogo, F.;
Dobrigkeit, C.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dorofeev, A.;
Anjos, R. C. dos;
Dova, M. T.;
Dundovic, A.;
Ebr, J.;
Engel, R.;
Erdmann, M.;
Erfani, M.;
Escobar, C. O.;
Espadanal, J.;
Etchegoyen, A.;
Falcke, H.;
Fang, K.;
Farrar, G.;
Fauth, A. C.;
Fazzini, N.;
Fick, B.;
Figueira, J. M.;
Filevich, A.;
Filipčič, A.;
Fratu, O.;
Freire, M. M.;
Fujii, T.;
Fuster, A.;
García, B.;
Garcia-Pinto, D.;
Gaté, F.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gherghel-Lascu, A.;
Ghia, P. L.;
Giaccari, U.;
Giammarchi, M.;
Giller, M.;
Głas, D.;
Glaser, C.;
Glass, H.;
Golup, G.;
Berisso, M. Gómez;
Vitale, P. F. Gómez;
González, N.;
Gookin, B.;
Gordon, J.;
Gorgi, A.;
Gorham, P.;
Gouffon, P.;
Grillo, A. F.;
Grubb, T. D.;
Guarino, F.;
Guedes, G. P.;
Hampel, M. R.;
Hansen, P.;
Harari, D.;
Harrison, T. A.;
Harton, J. L.;
Hasankiadeh, Q.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebbeker, T.;
Heck, D.;
Heimann, P.;
Herve, A. E.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hojvat, C.;
Holt, E.;
Homola, P.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Horvath, P.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Huege, T.;
Hulsman, J.;
Insolia, A.;
Isar, P. G.;
Jandt, I.;
Jansen, S.;
Johnsen, J. A.;
Josebachuili, M.;
Kääpä, A.;
Kambeitz, O.;
Kampert, K. H.;
Kasper, P.;
Katkov, I.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Kemp, E.;
Kieckhafer, R. M.;
Klages, H. O.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kleinfeller, J.;
Krause, R.;
Krohm, N.;
Kuempel, D.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kunka, N.;
Awad, A. Kuotb;
LaHurd, D.;
Latronico, L.;
Lauscher, M.;
Lautridou, P.;
Lebrun, P.;
Legumina, R.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Letessier-Selvon, A.;
Lhenry-Yvon, I.;
Link, K.;
Lopes, L.;
López, R.;
Casado, A. López;
Luce, Q.;
Lucero, A.;
Malacari, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Mandat, D.;
Mantsch, P.;
Mariazzi, A. G.;
Mariş, I. C.;
Marsella, G.;
Martello, D.;
Martinez, H.;
Bravo, O. Martínez;
Meza, J. J. Masías;
Mathes, H. J.;
Mathys, S.;
Matthews, J.;
Matthews, J. A. J.;
Matthiae, G.;
Mayotte, E.;
Mazur, P. O.;
Medina, C.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Melo, D.;
Menshikov, A.;
Messina, S.;
Micheletti, M. I.;
Middendorf, L.;
Minaya, I. A.;
Miramonti, L.;
Mitrica, B.;
Mockler, D.;
Molina-Bueno, L.;
Mollerach, S.;
Montanet, F.;
Morello, C.;
Mostafá, M.;
Müller, G.;
Muller, M. A.;
Müller, S.;
Naranjo, I.;
Navas, S.;
Nellen, L.;
Neuser, J.;
Nguyen, P. H.;
Niculescu-Oglinzanu, M.;
Niechciol, M.;
Niemietz, L.;
Niggemann, T.;
Nitz, D.;
Nosek, D.;
Novotny, V.;
Nožka, H.;
Núñez, L. A.;
Ochilo, L.;
Oikonomou, F.;
Olinto, A.;
Selmi-Dei, D. Pakk;
Palatka, M.;
Pallotta, J.;
Papenbreer, P.;
Parente, G.;
Parra, A.;
Paul, T.;
Pech, M.;
Pedreira, F.;
Pękala, J.;
Pelayo, R.;
Peña-Rodriguez, J.;
Pereira, L. A. S.;
Perrone, L.;
Peters, C.;
Petrera, S.;
Phuntsok, J.;
Piegaia, R.;
Pierog, T.;
Pieroni, P.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pirronello, V.;
Platino, M.;
Plum, M.;
Porowski, C.;
Prado, R. R.;
Privitera, P.;
Prouza, M.;
Quel, E. J.;
Querchfeld, S.;
Quinn, S.;
Ramos-Pollant, R.;
Rautenberg, J.;
Ravel, O.;
Ravignani, D.;
Reinert, D.;
Revenu, B.;
Ridky, J.;
Risse, M.;
Ristori, P.;
Rizi, V.;
de Carvalho, W. Rodrigues;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Rojo, J. Rodriguez;
Rodríguez-Frías, M. D.;
Rogozin, D.;
Rosado, J.;
Roth, M.;
Roulet, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Saffi, S. J.;
Saftoiu, A.;
Salazar, H.;
Saleh, A.;
Greus, F. Salesa;
Salina, G.;
Gomez, J. D. Sanabria;
Sánchez, F.;
Sanchez-Lucas, P.;
Santos, E. M.;
Santos, E.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sarkar, B.;
Sarmento, R.;
Sarmiento-Cano, C.;
Sato, R.;
Scarso, C.;
Schauer, M.;
Scherini, V.;
Schieler, H.;
Schmidt, D.;
Scholten, O.;
Schovánek, P.;
Schröder, F. G.;
Schulz, A.;
Schulz, J.;
Schumacher, J.;
Sciutto, S. J.;
Segreto, A.;
Settimo, M.;
Shadkam, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sigl, G.;
Silli, G.;
Sima, O.;
Śmiałkowski, A.;
Šmída, R.;
Snow, G. R.;
Sommers, P.;
Sonntag, S.;
Sorokin, J.;
Squartini, R.;
Stanca, D.;
Stanič, S.;
Stasielak, J.;
Strafella, F.;
Suarez, F.;
Durán, M. Suarez;
Sudholz, T.;
Suomijärvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Swain, J.;
Szadkowski, Z.;
Taborda, O. A.;
Tapia, A.;
Tepe, A.;
Theodoro, V. M.;
Timmermans, C.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tomankova, L.;
Tomé, B.;
Tonachini, A.;
Elipe, G. Torralba;
Machado, D. Torres;
Torri, M.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trini, M.;
Ulrich, R.;
Unger, M.;
Urban, M.;
Valbuena-Delgado, A.;
Galicia, J. F. Valdés;
Valiño, I.;
Valore, L.;
van Aar, G.;
van Bodegom, P.;
Berg, A. M. van den;
van Vliet, A.;
Varela, E.;
Cárdenas, B. Vargas;
Varner, G.;
Vázquez, J. R.;
Vázquez, R. A.;
Veberič, D.;
Verzi, V.;
Vicha, J.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Wahlberg, H.;
Wainberg, O.;
Walz, D.;
Watson, A. A.;
Weber, M.;
Weindl, A.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wilczyński, H.;
Winchen, T.;
Wittkowski, D.;
Wundheiler, B.;
Wykes, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yelos, D.;
Yushkov, A.;
Zas, E.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zepeda, A.;
Zimmermann, B.;
Ziolkowski, M.;
Zong, Z.;
Zuccarello, F.
Submitted: 2017-03-17, last modified: 2017-10-04
AMIGA (Auger Muons and Infill for the Ground Array) is an upgrade of the
Pierre Auger Observatory designed to extend its energy range of detection and
to directly measure the muon content of the cosmic ray primary particle
showers. The array will be formed by an infill of surface water-Cherenkov
detectors associated with buried scintillation counters employed for muon
counting. Each counter is composed of three scintillation modules, with a 10
m$^2$ detection area per module. In this paper, a new generation of detectors,
replacing the current multi-pixel photomultiplier tube (PMT) with silicon photo
sensors (aka. SiPMs), is proposed. The selection of the new device and its
front-end electronics is explained. A method to calibrate the counting system
that ensures the performance of the detector is detailed. This method has the
advantage of being able to be carried out in a remote place such as the one
where the detectors are deployed. High efficiency results, i.e. 98 % efficiency
for the highest tested overvoltage, combined with a low probability of
accidental counting ($\sim$2 %), show a promising performance for this new
system.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.04536 [pdf] - 1678456
Dynamic tunable notch filters for the Antarctic Impulsive Transient
Antenna (ANITA)
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Connolly, A.;
Deaconu, C.;
Gordon, J.;
Gorham, P. W.;
Kovacevich, M.;
Miki, C.;
Oberla, E.;
Roberts, J.;
Rotter, B.;
Stafford, S.;
Tatem, K.;
Batten, L.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, P.;
Chen, Y.;
Clem, J. M.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dailey, B.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Hsu, S.;
Huang, J.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Kowalski, J.;
Lam, J.;
Learned, J. G.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Ludwig, A.;
Matsuno, S.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Ripa, J.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Russell, J.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Shiao, J.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wang, S.;
Wissel, S. A.;
Wu, F.;
Young, R.
Submitted: 2017-09-13
The Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) is a NASA long-duration
balloon experiment with the primary goal of detecting ultra-high-energy
($>10^{18}\,\mbox{eV}$) neutrinos via the Askaryan Effect. The fourth ANITA
mission, ANITA-IV, recently flew from Dec 2 to Dec 29, 2016. For the first
time, the Tunable Universal Filter Frontend (TUFF) boards were deployed for
mitigation of narrow-band, anthropogenic noise with tunable, switchable notch
filters. The TUFF boards also performed second-stage amplification by
approximately 45 dB to boost the $\sim\,\mu\mbox{V-level}$ radio frequency (RF)
signals to $\sim$ mV-level for digitization, and supplied power via bias tees
to the first-stage, antenna-mounted amplifiers. The other major change in
signal processing in ANITA-IV is the resurrection of the $90^{\circ}$ hybrids
deployed previously in ANITA-I, in the trigger system, although in this paper
we focus on the TUFF boards. During the ANITA-IV mission, the TUFF boards were
successfully operated throughout the flight. They contributed to a factor of
2.8 higher total instrument livetime on average in ANITA-IV compared to
ANITA-III due to reduction of narrow-band, anthropogenic noise before a trigger
decision is made.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.00415 [pdf] - 1581705
Antarctic Surface Reflectivity Measurements from the ANITA-3 and HiCal-1
Experiments
Gorham, P. W.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Dailey, B.;
Dasgupta, P.;
Deaconu, C.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dowkontt, P. F.;
Fox, B. D.;
Gordon, J.;
Hill, B.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Jain, P.;
Kowalski, J.;
Lam, J.;
Learned, J. G.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Matsuno, S.;
Miki, C.;
Mottram, M.;
Mulrey, K.;
Nam, J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Novikov, A.;
Oberla, E.;
Prohira, S.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Rotter, B.;
Ratzlaff, K.;
Russell, J.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Tatem, K.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Wissel, S. A.;
Wu, F.;
Young, R.
Submitted: 2017-03-01, last modified: 2017-06-21
The primary science goal of the NASA-sponsored ANITA project is measurement
of ultra-high energy neutrinos and cosmic rays, observed via radio-frequency
signals resulting from a neutrino- or cosmic ray- interaction with terrestrial
matter (atmospheric or ice molecules, e.g.). Accurate inference of the energies
of these cosmic rays requires understanding the transmission/reflection of
radio wave signals across the ice-air boundary. Satellite-based measurements of
Antarctic surface reflectivity, using a co-located transmitter and receiver,
have been performed more-or-less continuously for the last few decades.
Satellite-based reflectivity surveys, at frequencies ranging from 2--45 GHz and
at near-normal incidence, yield generally consistent reflectivity maps across
Antarctica. Using the Sun as an RF source, and the ANITA-3 balloon borne
radio-frequency antenna array as the RF receiver, we have also measured the
surface reflectivity over the interval 200-1000 MHz, at elevation angles of
12-30 degrees, finding agreement with the Fresnel equations within systematic
errors. To probe low incidence angles, inaccessible to the Antarctic Solar
technique and not probed by previous satellite surveys, a novel experimental
approach ("HiCal-1") was devised. Unlike previous measurements, HiCal-ANITA
constitute a bi-static transmitter-receiver pair separated by hundreds of
kilometers. Data taken with HiCal, between 200--600 MHz shows a significant
departure from the Fresnel equations, constant with frequency over that band,
with the deficit increasing with obliquity of incidence, which we attribute to
the combined effects of possible surface roughness, surface grain effects,
radar clutter and/or shadowing of the reflection zone due to Earth curvature
effects.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.08567 [pdf] - 1521382
Evidence for a mixed mass composition at the `ankle' in the cosmic-ray
spectrum
The Pierre Auger Collaboration;
Aab, A.;
Abreu, P.;
Aglietta, M.;
Ahn, E. J.;
Samarai, I. Al;
Albuquerque, I. F. M.;
Allekotte, I.;
Allison, P.;
Almela, A.;
Castillo, J. Alvarez;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Anastasi, G. A.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Andrada, B.;
Andringa, S.;
Aramo, C.;
Arqueros, F.;
Arsene, N.;
Asorey, H.;
Assis, P.;
Aublin, J.;
Avila, G.;
Badescu, A. M.;
Balaceanu, A.;
Baus, C.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, K. H.;
Bellido, J. A.;
Berat, C.;
Bertaina, M. E.;
Bertou, X.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Billoir, P.;
Biteau, J.;
Blaess, S. G.;
Blanco, A.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleve, C.;
Boháčová, M.;
Boncioli, D.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Borodai, N.;
Botti, A. M.;
Brack, J.;
Brancus, I.;
Bretz, T.;
Bridgeman, A.;
Briechle, F. L.;
Buchholz, P.;
Bueno, A.;
Buitink, S.;
Buscemi, M.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Caccianiga, B.;
Caccianiga, L.;
Cancio, A.;
Canfora, F.;
Caramete, L.;
Caruso, R.;
Castellina, A.;
Cataldi, G.;
Cazon, L.;
Cester, R.;
Chavez, A. G.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Chinellato, J. A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Clay, R. W.;
Colalillo, R.;
Coleman, A.;
Collica, L.;
Coluccia, M. R.;
Conceição, R.;
Contreras, F.;
Cooper, M. J.;
Coutu, S.;
Covault, C. E.;
Cronin, J.;
Dallier, R.;
D'Amico, S.;
Daniel, B.;
Dasso, S.;
Daumiller, K.;
Dawson, B. R.;
de Almeida, R. M.;
de Jong, S. J.;
De Mauro, G.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
De Mitri, I.;
de Oliveira, J.;
de Souza, V.;
Debatin, J.;
del Peral, L.;
Deligny, O.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Di Matteo, A.;
Castro, M. L. Díaz;
Diogo, F.;
Dobrigkeit, C.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dorofeev, A.;
Anjos, R. C. dos;
Dova, M. T.;
Dundovic, A.;
Ebr, J.;
Engel, R.;
Erdmann, M.;
Erfani, M.;
Escobar, C. O.;
Espadanal, J.;
Etchegoyen, A.;
Falcke, H.;
Fang, K.;
Farrar, G.;
Fauth, A. C.;
Fazzini, N.;
Fick, B.;
Figueira, J. M.;
Filevich, A.;
Filipčič, A.;
Fratu, O.;
Freire, M. M.;
Fujii, T.;
Fuster, A.;
García, B.;
Garcia-Pinto, D.;
Gaté, F.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gherghel-Lascu, A.;
Ghia, P. L.;
Giaccari, U.;
Giammarchi, M.;
Giller, M.;
Głas, D.;
Glaser, C.;
Glass, H.;
Golup, G.;
Berisso, M. Gómez;
Vitale, P. F. Gómez;
González, N.;
Gookin, B.;
Gordon, J.;
Gorgi, A.;
Gorham, P.;
Gouffon, P.;
Grillo, A. F.;
Grubb, T. D.;
Guarino, F.;
Guedes, G. P.;
Hampel, M. R.;
Hansen, P.;
Harari, D.;
Harrison, T. A.;
Harton, J. L.;
Hasankiadeh, Q.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebbeker, T.;
Heck, D.;
Heimann, P.;
Herve, A. E.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hojvat, C.;
Holt, E.;
Homola, P.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Horvath, P.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Huege, T.;
Hulsman, J.;
Insolia, A.;
Isar, P. G.;
Jandt, I.;
Jansen, S.;
Johnsen, J. A.;
Josebachuili, M.;
Kääpä, A.;
Kambeitz, O.;
Kampert, K. H.;
Kasper, P.;
Katkov, I.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Kemp, E.;
Kieckhafer, R. M.;
Klages, H. O.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kleinfeller, J.;
Krause, R.;
Krohm, N.;
Kuempel, D.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kunka, N.;
Awad, A. Kuotb;
LaHurd, D.;
Latronico, L.;
Lauscher, M.;
Lautridou, P.;
Lebrun, P.;
Legumina, R.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Letessier-Selvon, A.;
Lhenry-Yvon, I.;
Link, K.;
Lopes, L.;
López, R.;
Casado, A. López;
Luce, Q.;
Lucero, A.;
Malacari, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Mandat, D.;
Mantsch, P.;
Mariazzi, A. G.;
Mariş, I. C.;
Marsella, G.;
Martello, D.;
Martinez, H.;
Bravo, O. Martínez;
Meza, J. J. Masías;
Mathes, H. J.;
Mathys, S.;
Matthews, J.;
Matthews, J. A. J.;
Matthiae, G.;
Mayotte, E.;
Mazur, P. O.;
Medina, C.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Melo, D.;
Menshikov, A.;
Messina, S.;
Micheletti, M. I.;
Middendorf, L.;
Minaya, I. A.;
Miramonti, L.;
Mitrica, B.;
Mockler, D.;
Molina-Bueno, L.;
Mollerach, S.;
Montanet, F.;
Morello, C.;
Mostafá, M.;
Müller, G.;
Muller, M. A.;
Müller, S.;
Naranjo, I.;
Navas, S.;
Nellen, L.;
Neuser, J.;
Nguyen, P. H.;
Niculescu-Oglinzanu, M.;
Niechciol, M.;
Niemietz, L.;
Niggemann, T.;
Nitz, D.;
Nosek, D.;
Novotny, V.;
Nožka, H.;
Núñez, L. A.;
Ochilo, L.;
Oikonomou, F.;
Olinto, A.;
Selmi-Dei, D. Pakk;
Palatka, M.;
Pallotta, J.;
Papenbreer, P.;
Parente, G.;
Parra, A.;
Paul, T.;
Pech, M.;
Pedreira, F.;
Pękala, J.;
Pelayo, R.;
Peña-Rodriguez, J.;
Pereira, L. A. S.;
Perrone, L.;
Peters, C.;
Petrera, S.;
Phuntsok, J.;
Piegaia, R.;
Pierog, T.;
Pieroni, P.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pirronello, V.;
Platino, M.;
Plum, M.;
Porowski, C.;
Prado, R. R.;
Privitera, P.;
Prouza, M.;
Quel, E. J.;
Querchfeld, S.;
Quinn, S.;
Ramos-Pollant, R.;
Rautenberg, J.;
Ravel, O.;
Ravignani, D.;
Reinert, D.;
Revenu, B.;
Ridky, J.;
Risse, M.;
Ristori, P.;
Rizi, V.;
de Carvalho, W. Rodrigues;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Rojo, J. Rodriguez;
Rodríguez-Frías, M. D.;
Rogozin, D.;
Rosado, J.;
Roth, M.;
Roulet, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Saffi, S. J.;
Saftoiu, A.;
Salazar, H.;
Saleh, A.;
Greus, F. Salesa;
Salina, G.;
Gomez, J. D. Sanabria;
Sánchez, F.;
Sanchez-Lucas, P.;
Santos, E. M.;
Santos, E.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sarkar, B.;
Sarmento, R.;
Sarmiento-Cano, C.;
Sato, R.;
Scarso, C.;
Schauer, M.;
Scherini, V.;
Schieler, H.;
Schmidt, D.;
Scholten, O.;
Schovánek, P.;
Schröder, F. G.;
Schulz, A.;
Schulz, J.;
Schumacher, J.;
Sciutto, S. J.;
Segreto, A.;
Settimo, M.;
Shadkam, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sigl, G.;
Silli, G.;
Sima, O.;
Śmiałkowski, A.;
Šmída, R.;
Snow, G. R.;
Sommers, P.;
Sonntag, S.;
Sorokin, J.;
Squartini, R.;
Stanca, D.;
Stanič, S.;
Stasielak, J.;
Strafella, F.;
Suarez, F.;
Durán, M. Suarez;
Sudholz, T.;
Suomijärvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Swain, J.;
Szadkowski, Z.;
Taborda, O. A.;
Tapia, A.;
Tepe, A.;
Theodoro, V. M.;
Timmermans, C.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tomankova, L.;
Tomé, B.;
Tonachini, A.;
Elipe, G. Torralba;
Machado, D. Torres;
Torri, M.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trini, M.;
Ulrich, R.;
Unger, M.;
Urban, M.;
Valbuena-Delgado, A.;
Galicia, J. F. Valdés;
Valiño, I.;
Valore, L.;
van Aar, G.;
van Bodegom, P.;
Berg, A. M. van den;
van Vliet, A.;
Varela, E.;
Cárdenas, B. Vargas;
Varner, G.;
Vázquez, J. R.;
Vázquez, R. A.;
Veberič, D.;
Verzi, V.;
Vicha, J.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Wahlberg, H.;
Wainberg, O.;
Walz, D.;
Watson, A. A.;
Weber, M.;
Weindl, A.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wilczyński, H.;
Winchen, T.;
Wittkowski, D.;
Wundheiler, B.;
Wykes, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yelos, D.;
Younk, P.;
Yushkov, A.;
Zas, E.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zepeda, A.;
Zimmermann, B.;
Ziolkowski, M.;
Zong, Z.;
Zuccarello, F.
Submitted: 2016-09-27, last modified: 2016-11-22
We report a first measurement for ultra-high energy cosmic rays of the
correlation between the depth of shower maximum and the signal in the water
Cherenkov stations of air-showers registered simultaneously by the fluorescence
and the surface detectors of the Pierre Auger Observatory. Such a correlation
measurement is a unique feature of a hybrid air-shower observatory with
sensitivity to both the electromagnetic and muonic components. It allows an
accurate determination of the spread of primary masses in the cosmic-ray flux.
Up till now, constraints on the spread of primary masses have been dominated by
systematic uncertainties. The present correlation measurement is not affected
by systematics in the measurement of the depth of shower maximum or the signal
in the water Cherenkov stations. The analysis relies on general characteristics
of air showers and is thus robust also with respect to uncertainties in
hadronic event generators. The observed correlation in the energy range around
the `ankle' at $\lg(E/{\rm eV})=18.5-19.0$ differs significantly from
expectations for pure primary cosmic-ray compositions. A light composition made
up of proton and helium only is equally inconsistent with observations. The
data are explained well by a mixed composition including nuclei with mass $A >
4$. Scenarios such as the proton dip model, with almost pure compositions, are
thus disfavoured as the sole explanation of the ultrahigh-energy cosmic-ray
flux at Earth.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.05218 [pdf] - 1457194
Characteristics of Four Upward-pointing Cosmic-ray-like Events Observed
with ANITA
Gorham, P. W.;
Nam, J.;
Romero-Wolf, A.;
Hoover, S.;
Allison, P.;
Banerjee, O.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Belov, K.;
Besson, D. Z.;
Binns, W. R.;
Bugaev, V.;
Cao, P.;
Chen, C.;
Chen, P.;
Clem, J. M.;
Connolly, A.;
Dailey, B.;
Deaconu, C.;
Cremonesi, L.;
Dowkonnt, P. F.;
Duvernois, M. A.;
Field, R. C.;
Fox, B. D.;
Goldstein, D.;
Gordon, J.;
Hast, C.;
Hebert, C. L.;
Hill, B.;
Hughes, K.;
Hupe, R.;
Israel, M. H.;
Javaid, A.;
Kowalski, J.;
Lam, J.;
Learned, J. G.;
Liewer, K. M.;
Liu, T. C.;
Link, J. T.;
Lusczek, E.;
Matsuno, S.;
Mercurio, B. C.;
Miki, C.;
Miocinovic, P.;
Mottram, M.;
Mulrey, K.;
Naudet, C. J.;
Ng, J.;
Nichol, R. J.;
Palladino, K.;
Rauch, B. F.;
Reil, K.;
Roberts, J.;
Rosen, M.;
Rotter, B.;
Russell, J.;
Ruckman, L.;
Saltzberg, D.;
Seckel, D.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Stafford, S.;
Stockham, J.;
Stockham, M.;
Strutt, B.;
Tatem, K.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vieregg, A. G.;
Walz, D.;
Wissel, S. A.;
Wu, F.
Submitted: 2016-03-16, last modified: 2016-06-29
We report on four radio-detected cosmic-ray (CR) or CR-like events observed
with the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA), a NASA-sponsored
long-duration balloon payload. Two of the four were previously identified as
stratospheric CR air showers during the ANITA-I flight. A third stratospheric
CR was detected during the ANITA-II flight. Here we report on characteristics
these three unusual CR events, which develop nearly horizontally, 20-30~km
above the surface of the Earth. In addition, we report on a fourth steeply
upward-pointing ANITA-I CR-like radio event which has characteristics
consistent with a primary that emerged from the surface of the ice. This
suggests a possible $\tau$-lepton decay as the origin of this event, but such
an interpretation would require significant suppression of the Standard Model
${\tau}$-neutrino cross section.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.00978 [pdf] - 1390689
Azimuthal asymmetry in the risetime of the surface detector signals of
the Pierre Auger Observatory
The Pierre Auger Collaboration;
Aab, A.;
Abreu, P.;
Aglietta, M.;
Ahn, E. J.;
Samarai, I. Al;
Albuquerque, I. F. M.;
Allekotte, I.;
Allison, P.;
Almela, A.;
Castillo, J. Alvarez;
Alvarez-Muñiz, J.;
Ambrosio, M.;
Anastasi, G. A.;
Anchordoqui, L.;
Andrada, B.;
Andringa, S.;
Aramo, C.;
Arqueros, F.;
Arsene, N.;
Asorey, H.;
Assis, P.;
Aublin, J.;
Avila, G.;
Awal, N.;
Badescu, A. M.;
Baus, C.;
Beatty, J. J.;
Becker, K. H.;
Bellido, J. A.;
Berat, C.;
Bertaina, M. E.;
Bertou, X.;
Biermann, P. L.;
Billoir, P.;
Biteau, J.;
Blaess, S. G.;
Blanco, A.;
Blazek, J.;
Bleve, C.;
Blümer, H.;
Boháčová, M.;
Boncioli, D.;
Bonifazi, C.;
Borodai, N.;
Botti, A. M.;
Brack, J.;
Brancus, I.;
Bretz, T.;
Bridgeman, A.;
Briechle, F. L.;
Buchholz, P.;
Bueno, A.;
Buitink, S.;
Buscemi, M.;
Caballero-Mora, K. S.;
Caccianiga, B.;
Caccianiga, L.;
Cancio, A.;
Canfora, F.;
Caramete, L.;
Caruso, R.;
Castellina, A.;
Cataldi, G.;
Cazon, L.;
Cester, R.;
Chavez, A. G.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Chinellato, J. A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Clay, R. W.;
Colalillo, R.;
Coleman, A.;
Collica, L.;
Coluccia, M. R.;
Conceição, R.;
Contreras, F.;
Cooper, M. J.;
Coutu, S.;
Covault, C. E.;
Cronin, J.;
Dallier, R.;
D'Amico, S.;
Daniel, B.;
Dasso, S.;
Daumiller, K.;
Dawson, B. R.;
de Almeida, R. M.;
de Jong, S. J.;
De Mauro, G.;
Neto, J. R. T. de Mello;
De Mitri, I.;
de Oliveira, J.;
de Souza, V.;
Debatin, J.;
del Peral, L.;
Deligny, O.;
Dhital, N.;
Di Giulio, C.;
Di Matteo, A.;
Castro, M. L. Díaz;
Diogo, F.;
Dobrigkeit, C.;
D'Olivo, J. C.;
Dorofeev, A.;
Anjos, R. C. dos;
Dova, M. T.;
Dundovic, A.;
Ebr, J.;
Engel, R.;
Erdmann, M.;
Erfani, M.;
Escobar, C. O.;
Espadanal, J.;
Etchegoyen, A.;
Falcke, H.;
Fang, K.;
Farrar, G.;
Fauth, A. C.;
Fazzini, N.;
Ferguson, A. P.;
Fick, B.;
Figueira, J. M.;
Filevich, A.;
Filipčič, A.;
Fratu, O.;
Freire, M. M.;
Fujii, T.;
Fuster, A.;
Gallo, F.;
García, B.;
Garcia-Pinto, D.;
Gate, F.;
Gemmeke, H.;
Gherghel-Lascu, A.;
Ghia, P. L.;
Giaccari, U.;
Giammarchi, M.;
Giller, M.;
Głas, D.;
Glaser, C.;
Glass, H.;
Golup, G.;
Berisso, M. Gómez;
Vitale, P. F. Gómez;
González, N.;
Gookin, B.;
Gordon, J.;
Gorgi, A.;
Gorham, P.;
Gouffon, P.;
Griffith, N.;
Grillo, A. F.;
Grubb, T. D.;
Guarino, F.;
Guedes, G. P.;
Hampel, M. R.;
Hansen, P.;
Harari, D.;
Harrison, T. A.;
Harton, J. L.;
Hasankiadeh, Q.;
Haungs, A.;
Hebbeker, T.;
Heck, D.;
Heimann, P.;
Herve, A. E.;
Hill, G. C.;
Hojvat, C.;
Hollon, N.;
Holt, E.;
Homola, P.;
Hörandel, J. R.;
Horvath, P.;
Hrabovský, M.;
Huege, T.;
Hulsman, J.;
Insolia, A.;
Isar, P. G.;
Jandt, I.;
Jansen, S.;
Jarne, C.;
Johnsen, J. A.;
Josebachuili, M.;
Kääpä, A.;
Kambeitz, O.;
Kampert, K. H.;
Kasper, P.;
Katkov, I.;
Keilhauer, B.;
Kemp, E.;
Kieckhafer, R. M.;
Klages, H. O.;
Kleifges, M.;
Kleinfeller, J.;
Krause, R.;
Krohm, N.;
Kuempel, D.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kunka, N.;
Awad, A. Kuotb;
LaHurd, D.;
Latronico, L.;
Lauscher, M.;
Lautridou, P.;
Lebrun, P.;
Legumina, R.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Letessier-Selvon, A.;
Lhenry-Yvon, I.;
Link, K.;
Lopes, L.;
López, R.;
Casado, A. López;
Lucero, A.;
Malacari, M.;
Mallamaci, M.;
Mandat, D.;
Mantsch, P.;
Mariazzi, A. G.;
Marin, V.;
Mariş, I. C.;
Marsella, G.;
Martello, D.;
Martinez, H.;
Bravo, O. Martínez;
Meza, J. J. Masías;
Mathes, H. J.;
Mathys, S.;
Matthews, J.;
Matthews, J. A. J.;
Matthiae, G.;
Maurizio, D.;
Mayotte, E.;
Mazur, P. O.;
Medina, C.;
Medina-Tanco, G.;
Mello, V. B. B.;
Melo, D.;
Menshikov, A.;
Messina, S.;
Micheletti, M. I.;
Middendorf, L.;
Minaya, I. A.;
Miramonti, L.;
Mitrica, B.;
Mockler, D.;
Molina-Bueno, L.;
Mollerach, S.;
Montanet, F.;
Morello, C.;
Mostafá, M.;
Moura, C. A.;
Müller, G.;
Muller, M. A.;
Müller, S.;
Naranjo, I.;
Navas, S.;
Necesal, P.;
Nellen, L.;
Nelles, A.;
Neuser, J.;
Nguyen, P. H.;
Niculescu-Oglinzanu, M.;
Niechciol, M.;
Niemietz, L.;
Niggemann, T.;
Nitz, D.;
Nosek, D.;
Novotny, V.;
Nožka, H.;
Núñez, L. A.;
Ochilo, L.;
Oikonomou, F.;
Olinto, A.;
Selmi-Dei, D. Pakk;
Palatka, M.;
Pallotta, J.;
Papenbreer, P.;
Parente, G.;
Parra, A.;
Paul, T.;
Pech, M.;
Pedreira, F.;
Pękala, J.;
Pelayo, R.;
Peña-Rodriguez, J.;
Pepe, I. M.;
Pereira, L. A. S.;
Perrone, L.;
Petermann, E.;
Peters, C.;
Petrera, S.;
Phuntsok, J.;
Piegaia, R.;
Pierog, T.;
Pieroni, P.;
Pimenta, M.;
Pirronello, V.;
Platino, M.;
Plum, M.;
Porowski, C.;
Prado, R. R.;
Privitera, P.;
Prouza, M.;
Quel, E. J.;
Querchfeld, S.;
Quinn, S.;
Rautenberg, J.;
Ravel, O.;
Ravignani, D.;
Revenu, B.;
Ridky, J.;
Risse, M.;
Ristori, P.;
Rizi, V.;
de Carvalho, W. Rodrigues;
Rojo, J. Rodriguez;
Rodríguez-Frías, M. D.;
Rogozin, D.;
Rosado, J.;
Roth, M.;
Roulet, E.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Saffi, S. J.;
Saftoiu, A.;
Salazar, H.;
Saleh, A.;
Greus, F. Salesa;
Salina, G.;
Gomez, J. D. Sanabria;
Sánchez, F.;
Sanchez-Lucas, P.;
Santos, E. M.;
Santos, E.;
Sarazin, F.;
Sarkar, B.;
Sarmento, R.;
Sarmiento-Cano, C.;
Sato, R.;
Scarso, C.;
Schauer, M.;
Scherini, V.;
Schieler, H.;
Schmidt, D.;
Scholten, O.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovánek, P.;
Schröder, F. G.;
Schulz, A.;
Schulz, J.;
Schumacher, J.;
Sciutto, S. J.;
Segreto, A.;
Settimo, M.;
Shadkam, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sigl, G.;
Sima, O.;
Śmiałkowski, A.;
Šmída, R.;
Snow, G. R.;
Sommers, P.;
Sonntag, S.;
Sorokin, J.;
Squartini, R.;
Stanca, D.;
Stanič, S.;
Stapleton, J.;
Stasielak, J.;
Strafella, F.;
Stutz, A.;
Suarez, F.;
Durán, M. Suarez;
Sudholz, T.;
Suomijärvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Sutherland, M. S.;
Swain, J.;
Szadkowski, Z.;
Taborda, O. A.;
Tapia, A.;
Tepe, A.;
Theodoro, V. M.;
Timmermans, C.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tomankova, L.;
Tomé, B.;
Tonachini, A.;
Elipe, G. Torralba;
Machado, D. Torres;
Travnicek, P.;
Trini, M.;
Ulrich, R.;
Unger, M.;
Urban, M.;
Valbuena-Delgado, A.;
Galicia, J. F. Valdés;
Valiño, I.;
Valore, L.;
van Aar, G.;
van Bodegom, P.;
Berg, A. M. van den;
van Vliet, A.;
Varela, E.;
Cárdenas, B. Vargas;
Varner, G.;
Vázquez, J. R.;
Vázquez, R. A.;
Veberič, D.;
Verzi, V.;
Vicha, J.;
Videla, M.;
Villaseñor, L.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Wahlberg, H.;
Wainberg, O.;
Walz, D.;
Watson, A. A.;
Weber, M.;
Weindl, A.;
Wiencke, L.;
Wilczyński, H.;
Winchen, T.;
Wittkowski, D.;
Wundheiler, B.;
Wykes, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yapici, T.;
Yelos, D.;
Yushkov, A.;
Zas, E.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zepeda, A.;
Zimmermann, B.;
Ziolkowski, M.;
Zong, Z.;
Zuccarello, F.
Submitted: 2016-04-04, last modified: 2016-04-13
The azimuthal asymmetry in the risetime of signals in Auger surface detector
stations is a source of information on shower development. The azimuthal
asymmetry is due to a combination of the longitudinal evolution of the shower
and geometrical effects related to the angles of incidence of the particles
into the detectors. The magnitude of the effect depends upon the zenith angle
and state of development of the shower and thus provides a novel observable,
$(\sec \theta)_\mathrm{max}$, sensitive to the mass composition of cosmic rays
above $3 \times 10^{18}$ eV. By comparing measurements with predictions from
shower simulations, we find for both of our adopted models of hadronic physics
(QGSJETII-04 and EPOS-LHC) an indication that the mean cosmic-ray mass
increases slowly with energy, as has been inferred from other studies. However,
the mass estimates are dependent on the shower model and on the range of
distance from the shower core selected. Thus the method has uncovered further
deficiencies in our understanding of shower modelling that must be resolved
before the mass composition can be inferred from $(\sec \theta)_\mathrm{max}$.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.2998 [pdf] - 1215604
The InfraRed Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) for TMT: Reflective ruled
diffraction grating performance testing and discussion
Submitted: 2014-07-10
We present the efficiency of near-infrared reflective ruled diffraction
gratings designed for the InfraRed Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS). IRIS is a first
light, integral field spectrograph and imager for the Thirty Meter Telescope
(TMT) and narrow field infrared adaptive optics system (NFIRAOS). We present
our experimental setup and analysis of the efficiency of selected reflective
diffraction gratings. These measurements are used as a comparison sample
against selected candidate Volume Phase Holographic (VPH) gratings (see Chen et
al., this conference). We investigate the efficiencies of five ruled gratings
designed for IRIS from two separate vendors. Three of the gratings accept a
bandpass of 1.19-1.37 {\mu}m (J band) with ideal spectral resolutions of R=4000
and R=8000, groove densities of 249 and 516 lines/mm, and blaze angles of 9.86
and 20.54 degrees, respectively. The other two gratings accept a bandpass of
1.51-1.82 {\mu}m (H Band) with an ideal spectral resolution of R=4000, groove
density of 141 lines/mm, and blaze angle of 9.86{\deg}. We measure the
efficiencies off blaze angle for all gratings and the efficiencies between the
polarization transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) states. The
peak reflective efficiencies are 98.90 +/- 3.36% (TM) and 84.99 +/- 2.74% (TM)
for the H-band R=4000 and J-band R=4000 respectively. The peak reflective
efficiency for the J-band R=8000 grating is 78.78 +/- 2.54% (TE). We find that
these ruled gratings do not exhibit a wide dependency on incident angle within
+/-3{\deg}. Our best-manufactured gratings were found to exhibit a dependency
on the polarization state of the incident beam with a ~10-20% deviation,
consistent with the theoretical efficiency predictions.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1401.4456 [pdf] - 1634011
Efficiency Measurements and Installation of a New Grating for the OSIRIS
Spectrograph at Keck Observatory
Mieda, Etsuko;
Wright, Shelley A.;
Larkin, James E.;
Graham, James R.;
Adkins, Sean M.;
Lyke, James E.;
Campbell, Randy D.;
Maire, Jerome;
Do, Tuan;
Gordon, Jacob
Submitted: 2014-01-17
OSIRIS is a near-infrared integral field spectrograph operating behind the
adaptive optics system at W. M. Keck Observatory. While OSIRIS has been a
scientifically productive instrument to date, its sensitivity has been limited
by a grating efficiency that is less than half of what was expected. The
spatially averaged efficiency of the old grating, weighted by error, is
measured to be 39.5 +/- 0.8 % at {\lambda} = 1.310 {\mu}m, with large field
dependent variation of 11.7 % due to efficiency variation across the grating
surface. Working with a new vendor, we developed a more efficient and uniform
grating with a weighted average efficiency at {\lambda} = 1.310 {\mu}m of 78.0
+/- 1.6 %, with field variation of only 2.2 %. This is close to double the
average efficiency and five times less variation across the field. The new
grating was installed in December 2012, and on- sky OSIRIS throughput shows an
average factor of 1.83 improvement in sensitivity between 1 and 2.4 microns. We
present the development history, testing, and implementation of this new
near-infrared grating for OSIRIS and report the comparison with the
predecessors. The higher sensitivities are already having a large impact on
scientific studies with OSIRIS.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1106.3196 [pdf] - 1077335
Detection noise bias and variance in the power spectrum and bispectrum
in optical interferometry
Submitted: 2011-06-16, last modified: 2012-04-13
Long-baseline optical interferometry uses the power spectrum and bispectrum
constructs as fundamental observables. Noise arising in the detection of the
fringe pattern gives rise to both variance and biases in the power spectrum and
bispectrum. Previous work on correcting the biases and estimating the variances
for these quantities typically includes restrictive assumptions about the
sampling of the interferogram and/or about the relative importance of Poisson
and Gaussian noise sources. Until now it has been difficult to accurately
compensate for systematic biases in data which violates these assumptions. We
seek a formalism to allow the construction of bias-free estimators of the
bispectrum and power spectrum, and to estimate their variances, under less
restrictive conditions which include both unevenly-sampled data and
measurements affected by a combination of noise sources with Poisson and
Gaussian statistics. We used a method based on the moments of the noise
distributions to derive formulae for the biases introduced to the power
spectrum and bispectrum when the complex fringe amplitude is derived from an
arbitrary linear combinations of a set of discrete interferogram measurements.
We simulated interferograms with different combinations of photon noise and
read noise and with different fringe encoding schemes to illustrate the effects
of these biases. We have derived formulae for bias-free estimators of the power
spectrum and bispectrum which can be used with any linear estimator of the
fringe complex amplitude. We have demonstrated the importance of bias-free
estimators for the case of the detection of faint companions (for example
exoplanets) using closure phase nulling. We have derived formulae for the
variance of the power spectrum and have shown how the variance of the
bispectrum could be calculated.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:0711.2430 [pdf] - 7090
Topology of Neutral Hydrogen Within the Small Magellanic Cloud
Submitted: 2007-11-15, last modified: 2008-05-20
In this paper, genus statistics have been applied to an HI column density map
of the Small Magellanic Cloud in order to study its topology. To learn how
topology changes with the scale of the system, we provide the study of topology
for column density maps at varying resolution. To evaluate the statistical
error of the genus we randomly reassign the phases of the Fourier modes while
keeping the amplitudes. We find, that at the smallest scales studied ($40
{pc}\leq\lambda\leq 80 {pc}$) the genus shift is in all regions negative,
implying a clump topology. At the larger scales ($110 {pc}\leq\lambda\leq 250
{pc}$) the topology shift is detected to be negative in 4 cases and positive
(``swiss cheese'' topology) in 2 cases. In 4 regions there is no statistically
significant topology shift at large scales.