Normalized to: Gomer, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.08638 [pdf] - 2100291
Galaxy-lens determination of $H_0$: constraining density slope in the
context of the mass sheet degeneracy
Submitted: 2019-07-19, last modified: 2020-05-22
Gravitational lensing offers a a competitive method to measure $H_0$ with the
goal of 1\% precision. A major obstacle comes in the form of lensing
degeneracies, such as the mass sheet degeneracy (MSD), which make it possible
for a family of density profiles to reproduce the same lensing observables but
return different values of $H_0$. The modeling process artificially selects one
choice from this family, potentially biasing $H_0$. The effect is more
pronounced when the profile of a given lens is not perfectly described by the
lens model, which will always be the case to some extent. To explore this, we
quantify the bias and spread in $H_0$ by creating quads from two-component mass
models and fitting them with a power-law ellipse+shear model. We find that the
bias does not correspond to the estimate one would calculate by transforming
the profile into a power law near the image radius. We also emulate the effect
of including stellar kinematics by performing fits where the slope is
constrained to the true value. Informing the fit using the true value near the
image radius can introduce substantial bias (0-23\% depending on the model). We
confirm using Jeans arguments that kinematic constraints can result in a biased
value of $H_0$ when the model profile is inadequately described. We conclude
that lensing degeneracies manifest through commonplace modeling approaches in a
more complicated way than is assumed in the literature. If stellar kinematics
incorrectly break the MSD, their inclusion may introduce more bias than their
omission.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1712.07665 [pdf] - 1639224
The impact of $\Lambda$CDM substructure and baryon-dark matter
transition on the image positions of quad galaxy lenses
Submitted: 2017-12-20, last modified: 2018-02-21
The positions of multiple images in galaxy lenses are related to the galaxy
mass distribution. Smooth elliptical mass profiles were previously shown to be
inadequate in reproducing the quad population. In this paper, we explore the
deviations from such smooth elliptical mass distributions. Unlike most other
work, we use a model-free approach based on the relative polar image angles of
quads, and their position in 3D space with respect to the Fundamental Surface
of Quads. The FSQ is defined by quads produced by elliptical lenses. We have
generated thousands of quads from synthetic populations of lenses with
substructure consistent with $\Lambda$CDM simulations, and found that such
perturbations are not sufficient to match the observed distribution of quads
relative to the FSQ. The result is unchanged even when subhalo masses are
increased by a factor of ten, and the most optimistic lensing selection bias is
applied. We then produce quads from galaxies created using two components,
representing baryons and dark matter. The transition from the mass being
dominated by baryons in inner radii to being dominated by dark matter in outer
radii can carry with it asymmetries, which would affect relative image angles.
We run preliminary experiments using lenses with two elliptical mass components
with nonidentical axis ratios and position angles, perturbations from
ellipticity in the form of nonzero Fourier coefficients $a_4$ and $a_6$, and
artificially offset ellipse centers as a proxy for asymmetry at image radii. We
show that combination of these effects is a promising way of accounting for
quad population properties. We conclude that the quad population provides a
unique and sensitive tool for constraining detailed mass distribution in the
centers of galaxies.