sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Gomer, Matthew R.

Normalized to: Gomer, M.

2 article(s) in total. 1 co-authors. Median position in authors list is 1,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:1907.08638  [pdf] - 2100291
Galaxy-lens determination of $H_0$: constraining density slope in the context of the mass sheet degeneracy
Comments: 36 pages, 11 figures, submitted to JCAP
Submitted: 2019-07-19, last modified: 2020-05-22
Gravitational lensing offers a a competitive method to measure $H_0$ with the goal of 1\% precision. A major obstacle comes in the form of lensing degeneracies, such as the mass sheet degeneracy (MSD), which make it possible for a family of density profiles to reproduce the same lensing observables but return different values of $H_0$. The modeling process artificially selects one choice from this family, potentially biasing $H_0$. The effect is more pronounced when the profile of a given lens is not perfectly described by the lens model, which will always be the case to some extent. To explore this, we quantify the bias and spread in $H_0$ by creating quads from two-component mass models and fitting them with a power-law ellipse+shear model. We find that the bias does not correspond to the estimate one would calculate by transforming the profile into a power law near the image radius. We also emulate the effect of including stellar kinematics by performing fits where the slope is constrained to the true value. Informing the fit using the true value near the image radius can introduce substantial bias (0-23\% depending on the model). We confirm using Jeans arguments that kinematic constraints can result in a biased value of $H_0$ when the model profile is inadequately described. We conclude that lensing degeneracies manifest through commonplace modeling approaches in a more complicated way than is assumed in the literature. If stellar kinematics incorrectly break the MSD, their inclusion may introduce more bias than their omission.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:1712.07665  [pdf] - 1639224
The impact of $\Lambda$CDM substructure and baryon-dark matter transition on the image positions of quad galaxy lenses
Comments: 18 pages, 15 figures, 2 tables
Submitted: 2017-12-20, last modified: 2018-02-21
The positions of multiple images in galaxy lenses are related to the galaxy mass distribution. Smooth elliptical mass profiles were previously shown to be inadequate in reproducing the quad population. In this paper, we explore the deviations from such smooth elliptical mass distributions. Unlike most other work, we use a model-free approach based on the relative polar image angles of quads, and their position in 3D space with respect to the Fundamental Surface of Quads. The FSQ is defined by quads produced by elliptical lenses. We have generated thousands of quads from synthetic populations of lenses with substructure consistent with $\Lambda$CDM simulations, and found that such perturbations are not sufficient to match the observed distribution of quads relative to the FSQ. The result is unchanged even when subhalo masses are increased by a factor of ten, and the most optimistic lensing selection bias is applied. We then produce quads from galaxies created using two components, representing baryons and dark matter. The transition from the mass being dominated by baryons in inner radii to being dominated by dark matter in outer radii can carry with it asymmetries, which would affect relative image angles. We run preliminary experiments using lenses with two elliptical mass components with nonidentical axis ratios and position angles, perturbations from ellipticity in the form of nonzero Fourier coefficients $a_4$ and $a_6$, and artificially offset ellipse centers as a proxy for asymmetry at image radii. We show that combination of these effects is a promising way of accounting for quad population properties. We conclude that the quad population provides a unique and sensitive tool for constraining detailed mass distribution in the centers of galaxies.