Normalized to: Golenetskii, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.11178 [pdf] - 2099852
A peculiar hard X-ray counterpart of a Galactic fast radio burst
Ridnaia, A.;
Svinkin, D.;
Frederiks, D.;
Bykov, A.;
Popov, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Lysenko, A.;
Tsvetkova, A.;
Ulanov, M.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2020-05-22
Fast radio bursts are bright, millisecond-scale radio flashes of yet unknown
physical origin. Recently, their extragalactic nature has been demonstrated,
and an increasing number of the sources have been found to repeat. Young,
highly magnetized, isolated neutron stars - magnetars - have been suggested as
the most promising candidates for fast radio burst progenitors owing to their
energetics and high X-ray flaring activity. Here we report the detection with
the Konus-Wind detector of a hard X-ray event of April 28, 2020, temporarily
coincident with a bright, two-peak radio burst with properties remarkably
similar to those of fast radio bursts. The source of the radio burst is located
in the direction to the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154, which recently entered
an active state. We show that a separation between two peaks of the
double-peaked X-ray burst is nearly the same as that of the radio peaks,
confirming that the X-ray and radio emission most likely have a common origin.
Thus, this is the first simultaneous detection of a fast radio burst from a
Galactic magnetar and its high-energy counterpart. The total energy emitted in
X-rays in this burst is typical of bright short magnetar bursts, but its spiky
light curve and an unusual hardness of the energy spectrum distinguish the
April 28 event among multiple 'ordinary' flares detected from SGR 1935+2154
previously. This, and a recent non-detection of radio emission from two typical
bright soft bursts from the same magnetar, may imply the existence of a special
class of magnetar flares capable of producing fast radio bursts.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.00402 [pdf] - 1908799
GRB observations with Konus-WIND experiment
Submitted: 2019-06-30
We give a short review of gamma-ray burst (GRB) observations with the
Konus-WIND (KW) experiment, which has been providing a continuous all-sky
coverage in the 20 keV-15 MeV band during the period from 1994 to present. The
recent results include a systematic study of GRBs with known redshifts and a
search for ultra-long GRBs in the KW archival data. We also discuss the KW
capabilities for multi-messenger astronomy.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.08746 [pdf] - 1595233
The Konus-Wind catalog of gamma-ray bursts with known redshifts. I.
Bursts detected in the triggered mode
Tsvetkova, A.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Lysenko, A.;
Oleynik, P.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ulanov, M.;
Cline, T.;
Hurley, K.;
Aptekar, R.
Submitted: 2017-10-24, last modified: 2017-10-25
In this catalog, we present the results of a systematic study of gamma-ray
bursts (GRBs) with reliable redshift estimates detected in the triggered mode
of the Konus-Wind (KW) experiment during the period from 1997 February to 2016
June. The sample consists of 150 GRBs (including twelve short/hard bursts) and
represents the largest set of cosmological GRBs studied to date over a broad
energy band. From the temporal and spectral analyses of the sample, we provide
the burst durations, the spectral lags, the results of spectral fits with two
model functions, the total energy fluences, and the peak energy fluxes. Based
on the GRB redshifts, which span the range 0.1 <= z <= 5, we estimate the
rest-frame, isotropic-equivalent energy and peak luminosity. For 32 GRBs with
reasonably-constrained jet breaks we provide the collimation-corrected values
of the energetics. We consider the behavior of the rest-frame GRB parameters in
the hardness-duration and hardness-intensity planes, and confirm the "Amati"
and "Yonetoku" relations for Type II GRBs. The correction for the jet
collimation does not improve these correlations for the KW sample. We discuss
the influence of instrumental selection effects on the GRB parameter
distributions and estimate the KW GRB detection horizon, which extends to z ~
16.6, stressing the importance of GRBs as probes of the early Universe.
Accounting for the instrumental bias, we estimate the KW GRB luminosity
evolution, luminosity and isotropic-energy functions, and the evolution of the
GRB formation rate, which are in general agreement with those obtained in
previous studies.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1611.07947 [pdf] - 1580686
Search for Gravitational Waves Associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts During
the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run and Implications for the Origin of GRB
150906B
LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
Virgo Collaboration;
IPN Collaboration;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T. D.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Adya, V. B.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Agatsuma, K.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Aiello, L.;
Ain, A.;
Ajith, P.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Altin, P. A.;
Ananyeva, A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Appert, S.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Arnaud, N.;
Arun, K. G.;
Ascenzi, S.;
Ashton, G.;
Ast, M.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Avila-Alvarez, A.;
Babak, S.;
Bacon, P.;
Bader, M. K. M.;
Baker, P. T.;
Baldaccini, F.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barclay, S. E.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barta, D.;
Bartlett, J.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Bazzan, M.;
Beer, C.;
Bejger, M.;
Belahcene, I.;
Belgin, M.;
Bell, A. S.;
Berger, B. K.;
Bergmann, G.;
Berry, C. P. L.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bhagwat, S.;
Bhandare, R.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Billman, C. R.;
Birch, J.;
Birney, R.;
Birnholtz, O.;
Biscans, S.;
Bisht, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackman, J.;
Blair, C. D.;
Blair, D. G.;
Blair, R. M.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bohe, A.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boom, B. A.;
Bork, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bouffanais, Y.;
Bozzi, A.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brockill, P.;
Broida, J. E.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brown, N. M.;
Brunett, S.;
Buchanan, C. C.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cabero, M.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Cahillane, C.;
Bustillo, J. Calder'on;
Callister, T. A.;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Canepa, M.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Cao, H.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Capocasa, E.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Diaz, J. Casanueva;
Casentini, C.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavagli`a, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C. B.;
Baiardi, L. Cerboni;
Cerretani, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chan, M.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Cheeseboro, B. D.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chen, Y.;
Cheng, H. -P.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Chmiel, T.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, A. J. K.;
Chua, S.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, J. A.;
Cleva, F.;
Cocchieri, C.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C. G.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conti, L.;
Cooper, S. J.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Cortese, S.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coughlin, S. B.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S. T.;
Couvares, P.;
Covas, P. B.;
Cowan, E. E.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cripe, J.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cullen, T. J.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Canton, T. Dal;
D'alya, G.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dasgupta, A.;
Costa, C. F. Da Silva;
Dattilo, V.;
Dave, I.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Davis, D.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, B.;
Day, R.;
De, S.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
De Laurentis, M.;
Del'eglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Devenson, J.;
Devine, R. C.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
D'iaz, M. C.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Giovanni, M.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Pace, S.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Dolique, V.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Dorrington, I.;
Douglas, R.;
'Alvarez, M. Dovale;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S. E.;
Edo, T. B.;
Edwards, M. C.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Eisenstein, R. A.;
Essick, R. C.;
Etienne, Z.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T. M.;
Everett, R.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fair, H.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Fauchon-Jones, E. J.;
Favata, M.;
Fays, M.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Galiana, A. Fern'andez;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Fiorucci, D.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fletcher, M.;
Fong, H.;
Forsyth, S. S.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Frey, V.;
Fries, E. M.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gabbard, H.;
Gadre, B. U.;
Gaebel, S. M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S. G.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaur, G.;
Gayathri, V.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
George, J.;
Gergely, L.;
Germain, V.;
Ghonge, S.;
Ghosh, Abhirup;
Ghosh, Archisman;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gill, K.;
Glaefke, A.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
Gonz'alez, G.;
Castro, J. M. Gonzalez;
Gopakumar, A.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S. E.;
Gosselin, M.;
Gouaty, R.;
Grado, A.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greco, G.;
Green, A. C.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guo, X.;
Gupta, A.;
Gupta, M. K.;
Gushwa, K. E.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hacker, J. J.;
Hall, B. R.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hammond, G.;
Haney, M.;
Hanke, M. M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Hardwick, T.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Hart, M. J.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Healy, J.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M. C.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Hennig, J.;
Henry, J.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Hopkins, P.;
Hough, J.;
Houston, E. A.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y. M.;
Huerta, E. A.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Indik, N.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isa, H. N.;
Isac, J. -M.;
Isi, M.;
Isogai, T.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacqmin, T.;
Jani, K.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Jawahar, S.;
Jim'enez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
Junker, J.;
Kalaghatgi, C. V.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karki, S.;
Karvinen, K. S.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
K'ef'elian, F.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kennedy, R.;
Key, J. S.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khan, I.;
Khan, S.;
Khan, Z.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kijbunchoo, N.;
Kim, Chunglee;
Kim, J. C.;
Kim, Whansun;
Kim, W.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
Kimbrell, S. J.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kirchhoff, R.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klein, B.;
Kleybolte, L.;
Klimenko, S.;
Koch, P.;
Koehlenbeck, S. M.;
Koley, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kontos, A.;
Korobko, M.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kr"amer, C.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Kr'olak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lackey, B. D.;
Landry, M.;
Lang, R. N.;
Lange, J.;
Lantz, B.;
Lanza, R. K.;
Lartaux-Vollard, A.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Laxen, M.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, K.;
Lehmann, J.;
Lenon, A.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libson, A.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Liu, J.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
London, L. T.;
Lord, J. E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J. D.;
Lovelace, G.;
L"uck, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Lynch, R.;
Ma, Y.;
Macfoy, S.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magana-Sandoval, F.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mansell, G. L.;
Manske, M.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
M'arka, S.;
M'arka, Z.;
Markosyan, A. S.;
Maros, E.;
Martelli, F.;
Martellini, L.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martynov, D. V.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Masso-Reid, M.;
Mastrogiovanni, S.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
Mazumder, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McCormick, S.;
McGrath, C.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McManus, D. J.;
McRae, T.;
McWilliams, S. T.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Meidam, J.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mendoza-Gandara, D.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merilh, E. L.;
Merzougui, M.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Messick, C.;
Metzdorff, R.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Middleton, H.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, A. L.;
Miller, A.;
Miller, B. B.;
Miller, J.;
Millhouse, M.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Ming, J.;
Mirshekari, S.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Montani, M.;
Moore, B. C.;
Moore, C. J.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Muir, A. W.;
Mukherjee, Arunava;
Mukherjee, D.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mukund, N.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Muniz, E. A. M.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Napier, K.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nelson, T. J. N.;
Neri, M.;
Nery, M.;
Neunzert, A.;
Newport, J. M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T. T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A.;
Noack, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Oberling, J.;
Ochsner, E.;
Oelker, E.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Oliver, M.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, Richard J.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Pace, A. E.;
Page, J.;
Pai, A.;
Pai, S. A.;
Palamos, J. R.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pal-Singh, A.;
Pan, H.;
Pankow, C.;
Pannarale, F.;
Pant, B. C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Paoli, A.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H. R.;
Parker, W.;
Pascucci, D.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Patricelli, B.;
Pearlstone, B. L.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pedurand, R.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perez, C. J.;
Perreca, A.;
Perri, L. M.;
Pfeiffer, H. P.;
Phelps, M.;
Piccinni, O. J.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pillant, G.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poe, M.;
Poggiani, R.;
Popolizio, P.;
Post, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Pratt, J. W. W.;
Predoi, V.;
Prestegard, T.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L. G.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
P"urrer, M.;
Qi, H.;
Qin, J.;
Qiu, S.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E. A.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajan, C.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Read, J.;
Regimbau, T.;
Rei, L.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Rew, H.;
Reyes, S. D.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riles, K.;
Rizzo, M.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robie, R.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Roma, V. J.;
Romano, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosi'nska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
R"udiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sachdev, S.;
Sadecki, T.;
Sadeghian, L.;
Sakellariadou, M.;
Salconi, L.;
Saleem, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Samajdar, A.;
Sammut, L.;
Sampson, L. M.;
Sanchez, E. J.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Sauter, O.;
Savage, R. L.;
Sawadsky, A.;
Schale, P.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schmidt, E.;
Schmidt, J.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Sch"onbeck, A.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwalbe, S. G.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Setyawati, Y.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaffer, T. J.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Sheperd, A.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Shoemaker, D. M.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sieniawska, M.;
Sigg, D.;
Silva, A. D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L. P.;
Singh, A.;
Singh, R.;
Singhal, A.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Smith, B.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Sorrentino, F.;
Souradeep, T.;
Spencer, A. P.;
Srivastava, A. K.;
Staley, A.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steinmeyer, D.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Stevenson, S. P.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Stratta, G.;
Strigin, S. E.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sun, L.;
Sunil, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B. L.;
Szczepa'nczyk, M. J.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
T'apai, M.;
Taracchini, A.;
Taylor, R.;
Theeg, T.;
Thomas, E. G.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thrane, E.;
Tippens, T.;
Tiwari, S.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toland, K.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Tornasi, Z.;
Torrie, C. I.;
T"oyr"a, D.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trifir`o, D.;
Trinastic, J.;
Tringali, M. C.;
Trozzo, L.;
Tse, M.;
Tso, R.;
Turconi, M.;
Tuyenbayev, D.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
van Bakel, N.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
Vander-Hyde, D. C.;
van der Schaaf, L.;
van Heijningen, J. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vardaro, M.;
Varma, V.;
Vass, S.;
Vas'uth, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Venugopalan, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicer'e, A.;
Viets, A. D.;
Vinciguerra, S.;
Vine, D. J.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Voss, D. V.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyatchanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L. E.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, G.;
Wang, H.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, Y.;
Ward, R. L.;
Warner, J.;
Was, M.;
Watchi, J.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Whittle, C.;
Williams, D.;
Williams, R. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M. H.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Woehler, J.;
Worden, J.;
Wright, J. L.;
Wu, D. S.;
Wu, G.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yap, M. J.;
Yu, Hang;
Yu, Haocun;
Yvert, M.;
zny, A. Zadro.;
Zangrando, L.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zevin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, M.;
Zhang, T.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhou, M.;
Zhou, Z.;
Zhu, S. J.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.
Submitted: 2016-11-23, last modified: 2017-06-21
We present the results of the search for gravitational waves (GWs) associated
with $\gamma$-ray bursts detected during the first observing run of the
Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). We find no
evidence of a GW signal for any of the 41 $\gamma$-ray bursts for which LIGO
data are available with sufficient duration. For all $\gamma$-ray bursts, we
place lower bounds on the distance to the source using the optimistic
assumption that GWs with an energy of $10^{-2}M_\odot c^2$ were emitted within
the $16$-$500\,$Hz band, and we find a median 90% confidence limit of 71$\,$Mpc
at 150$\,$Hz. For the subset of 19 short/hard $\gamma$-ray bursts, we place
lower bounds on distance with a median 90% confidence limit of 90$\,$Mpc for
binary neutron star (BNS) coalescences, and 150 and 139$\,$Mpc for neutron
star-black hole coalescences with spins aligned to the orbital angular momentum
and in a generic configuration, respectively. These are the highest distance
limits ever achieved by GW searches. We also discuss in detail the results of
the search for GWs associated with GRB 150906B, an event that was localized by
the InterPlanetary Network near the local galaxy NGC 3313, which is at a
luminosity distance of 54$\,$Mpc ($z=0.0124$). Assuming the $\gamma$-ray
emission is beamed with a jet half-opening angle $\leq 30^{\circ}$, we exclude
a BNS and a neutron star-black hole in NGC 3313 as the progenitor of this event
with confidence $>99$%. Further, we exclude such progenitors up to a distance
of 102$\,$Mpc and 170$\,$Mpc, respectively.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01264 [pdf] - 1447654
Investigation of Primordial Black Hole Bursts using Interplanetary
Network Gamma-ray Bursts
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Hurley, K.;
MacGibbon, J. H;
Svinkin, D. S;
Aptekar, R. L;
Golenetskii, S. V;
Frederiks, D. D;
Pal'shin, V. D;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Kozyrev, A. S;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohmori, N.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A;
McTiernan, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-03, last modified: 2016-04-27
The detection of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in the solar neighborhood would have
very important implications for GRB phenomenology. The leading theories for
cosmological GRBs would not be able to explain such events. The final bursts of
evaporating Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), however, would be a natural
explanation for local GRBs. We present a novel technique that can constrain the
distance to gamma-ray bursts using detections from widely separated,
non-imaging spacecraft. This method can determine the actual distance to the
burst if it is local. We applied this method to constrain distances to a sample
of 36 short duration GRBs detected by the Interplanetary Network (IPN) that
show observational properties that are expected from PBH evaporations. These
bursts have minimum possible distances in the 10^13-10^18 cm (7-10^5 AU) range,
consistent with the expected PBH energetics and with a possible origin in the
solar neighborhood, although none of the bursts can be unambiguously
demonstrated to be local. Assuming these bursts are real PBH events, we
estimate lower limits on the PBH burst evaporation rate in the solar
neighborhood.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.06832 [pdf] - 1415142
The second Konus-Wind catalog of short gamma-ray bursts
Svinkin, D. S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Hurley, K.
Submitted: 2016-03-22
In this catalog, we present the results of a systematic study of 295 short
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by Konus-Wind (KW) from 1994 to 2010. From the
temporal and spectral analyses of the sample, we provide the burst durations,
the spectral lags, the results of spectral fits with three model functions, the
total energy fluences and the peak energy fluxes of the bursts. We discuss
evidence found for an additional power-law spectral component and the presence
of extended emission in a fraction of the KW short GRBs. Finally, we consider
the results obtained in the context of the Type I (merger-origin) / Type II
(collapsar-origin) classifications.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.2015 [pdf] - 904750
Konus-Wind and Helicon-Coronas-F Observations of Solar Flares
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Charikov, Yu. E.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Kokomov, A. A.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Sokolova, Z. Ya.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.
Submitted: 2014-12-05
Results of solar flare observations obtained in the Konus-Wind experiment
from November, 1994 to December, 2013 and in the Helicon Coronas-F experiment
during its operation from 2001 to 2005, are presented. For the periods
indicated Konus-Wind detected in the trigger mode 834 solar flares, and
Helicon-Coronas-F detected more than 300 solar flares.
A description of the instruments and data processing techniques are given. As
an example, the analysis of the spectral evolution of the flares
SOL2012-11-08T02:19 (M 1.7) and SOL2002-03-10T01:34 (C5.1) is made with the
Konus-Wind data and the flare SOL2003-10-26T06:11 (X1.2) is analyzed in the
2.223 MeV deuterium line with the Helicon-Coronas-F data.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1411.5589 [pdf] - 1223273
A search for giant flares from soft gamma-repeaters in nearby galaxies
in the Konus-Wind short burst sample
Submitted: 2014-11-20
The knowledge of the rate of soft gamma-ray repeater (SGR) giant flares is
important for understanding the giant flare mechanism and the SGR energy budget
in the framework of the magnetar model. We estimate the upper limit to the rate
using the results of an extensive search for extragalactic soft gamma-repeater
giant flares (GFs) among 140 short gamma-ray bursts detected between 1994 and
2010 by Konus-Wind using InterPlanetary Network (IPN) localizations and
temporal parameters. We show that Konus-Wind and the IPN are capable of
detecting GFs with energies of 2.3x10^46 erg (which is the energy of the GF
from SGR 1806-20 assuming a distance of 15 kpc) at distances of up to about 30
Mpc and GFs with energies of <10^45 erg (which is the energy of the GF from SGR
0526-66) at distances of up to about 6 Mpc. Using a sample of 1896 nearby
galaxies we found that only two bursts, GRB 051103 and GRB 070201, have a low
chance coincidence probability between an IPN localization and a nearby galaxy.
We found the upper limit to the fraction of GFs among short GRBs with fluence
above ~5x10^-7 erg cm^-2 to be <8% (95% confidence level). Assuming that the
number of active SGRs in nearby galaxies is proportional to their core-collapse
supernova rate, we derived the one-sided 95% upper limit to the rate of GFs
with energy output similar to the GF from SGR 1806-20 to be (0.6--1.2)x10^-4
Q_46^-1.5 yr^-1 per SGR, where Q_46 is the GF energy output in 10^46 erg.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.4210 [pdf] - 863113
GROND coverage of the main peak of Gamma-Ray Burst 130925A
Greiner, J.;
Yu, H. -F.;
Krühler, T.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Beloborodov, A.;
Bhat, P. N.;
Bolmer, J.;
van Eerten, H.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Elliott, J.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Graham, J. F.;
Hurley, K.;
Kann, D. A.;
Klose, S.;
Guelbenzu, A. Nicuesa;
Rau, A.;
Schady, P.;
Schmidl, S.;
Sudilovsky, V.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tanga, M.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Varela, K.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2014-07-16
Prompt or early optical emission in gamma-ray bursts is notoriously difficult
to measure, and observations of the dozen cases show a large variety of
properties. Yet, such early emission promises to help us achieve a better
understanding of the GRB emission process(es).
We performed dedicated observations of the ultra-long duration (T90 about
7000 s) GRB 130925A in the optical/near-infrared with the 7-channel "Gamma-Ray
Burst Optical and Near-infrared Detector" (GROND) at the 2.2m MPG/ESO
telescope. We detect an optical/NIR flare with an amplitude of nearly 2 mag
which is delayed with respect to the keV--MeV prompt emission by about 300--400
s. The decay time of this flare is shorter than the duration of the flare (500
s) or its delay.
While we cannot offer a straightforward explanation, we discuss the
implications of the flare properties and suggest ways toward understanding it.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.5237 [pdf] - 1209648
Optical Follow-Up Observations of PTF10qts, a Luminous Broad-Lined Type
Ic Supernova Found by the Palomar Transient Factory
Walker, E. S.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Pian, E.;
Hurley, K.;
Arcavi, I.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Horesh, A.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Poznanski, D.;
Silverman, J. M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Ofek, E.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Ohno, M.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Zhang, X. L-.
Submitted: 2014-05-20
We present optical photometry and spectroscopy of the broad-lined Type Ic
supernova (SNIc-BL) PTF10qts, which was discovered as part of the Palomar
Transient Factory. The supernova was located in a dwarf galaxy of magnitude
$r=21.1$ at a redshift $z=0.0907$. We find that the $R$-band light curve is a
poor proxy for bolometric data and use photometric and spectroscopic data to
construct and constrain the bolometric light curve. The derived bolometric
magnitude at maximum light is $M_{\rm bol} = -18.51\pm0.2$ mag, comparable to
that of SN 1998bw ($M_{\rm bol} = -18.7$ mag) which was associated with a
gamma-ray burst (GRB). PTF10qts is one of the most luminous SNIc-BL observed
without an accompanying GRB. We estimate the physical parameters of the
explosion using data from our programme of follow-up observations, finding that
it produced a larger mass of radioactive nickel compared to other SNeIc-BL with
similar inferred ejecta masses and kinetic energies. The progenitor of the
event was likely a $\sim20$M$_{\odot}$ star.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.4139 [pdf] - 1209585
GRB 051008: A long, spectrally-hard dust-obscured GRB in a Lyman-Break
Galaxy at z ~ 2.8
Volnova, A. A.;
Pozanenko, A. S.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Perley, D. A.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Kann, D. A.;
Rumyantsev, V. V.;
Biryukov, V. V.;
Burkhonov, O.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Ferrero, P.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Klose, S.;
Loznikov, V. M.;
Minaev, P. Yu.;
Stecklum, B.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Postigo, A. de Ugarte;
Ulanov, M. V.
Submitted: 2014-05-16
We present observations of the dark Gamma-Ray Burst GRB 051008 provided by
Swift/BAT, Swift/XRT, Konus-WIND, INTEGRAL/SPI-ACS in the high-energy domain
and the Shajn, Swift/UVOT, Tautenburg, NOT, Gemini and Keck I telescopes in the
optical and near-infrared bands. The burst was detected only in gamma- and
X-rays and neither a prompt optical nor a radio afterglow were detected down to
deep limits. We identified the host galaxy of the burst, which is a typical
Lyman-break Galaxy (LBG) with R-magnitude of 24.06 +/- 0.10. A redshift of the
galaxy of z = 2.77 (-0.20,+0.15) is measured photometrically due to the
presence of a clear, strong Lyman-break feature. The host galaxy is a small
starburst galaxy with moderate intrinsic extinction (A_V = 0.3 mag) and has a
SFR of ~ 60 M_Sun / yr typical for LBGs. It is one of the few cases where a GRB
host has been found to be a classical Lyman-break galaxy. Using the redshift we
estimate the isotropic-equivalent radiated energy of the burst to be E_iso =
(1.15 +/- 0.20) x 10^54 erg. We also provide evidence in favour of the
hypothesis that the darkness of GRB 051008 is due to local absorption resulting
from a dense circumburst medium.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.6639 [pdf] - 848128
Search for gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts detected
by the InterPlanetary Network
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration;
the Virgo Collaboration;
Aasi, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abbott, T.;
Abernathy, M. R.;
Acernese, F.;
Ackley, K.;
Adams, C.;
Adams, T.;
Addesso, P.;
Adhikari, R. X.;
Affeldt, C.;
Agathos, M.;
Aggarwal, N.;
Aguiar, O. D.;
Ajith, P.;
Alemic, A.;
Allen, B.;
Allocca, A.;
Amariutei, D.;
Andersen, M.;
Anderson, R. A.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Arai, K.;
Araya, M. C.;
Arceneaux, C.;
Areeda, J. S.;
Ast, S.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astone, P.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Augustus, H.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P. T.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S. W.;
Barayoga, J. C.;
Barbet, M.;
Barish, B. C.;
Barker, D.;
Barone, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Basti, A.;
Batch, J. C.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Baune, C.;
Bavigadda, V.;
Behnke, B.;
Bejger, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belczynski, C.;
Bell, A. S.;
Bell, C.;
Bergmann, G.;
Bersanetti, D.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Biscans, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Biwer, C.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bloemen, S.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Boer, M.;
Bogaert, G.;
Bogan, C.;
Bond, C.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschi, V.;
Bose, Sukanta;
Bosi, L.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Branchesi, M.;
Brau, J. E.;
Briant, T.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brillet, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brisson, V.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brown, D. D.;
Brückner, F.;
Buchman, S.;
Buikema, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burman, R.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Bustillo, J. Calderón;
Calloni, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannon, K. C.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C. D.;
Carbognani, F.;
Carbone, L.;
Caride, S.;
Castaldi, G.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Celerier, C.;
Cella, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chakraborty, R.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chamberlin, S. J.;
Chao, S.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chen, X.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cho, H. S.;
Cho, M.;
Chow, J. H.;
Christensen, N.;
Chu, Q.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Ciani, G.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D. E.;
Clark, J. A.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colla, A.;
Collette, C.;
Colombini, M.;
Cominsky, L.;
Constancio, M.;
Conte, A.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsi, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M. W.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Countryman, S.;
Couvares, P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Cowart, M. J.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Coyne, R.;
Craig, K.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Croce, R. P.;
Crowder, S. G.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Cutler, C.;
Dahl, K.;
Canton, T. Dal;
Damjanic, M.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daveloza, H.;
Davier, M.;
Davies, G. S.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
Deléglise, S.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
Denker, T.;
Dent, T.;
Dereli, H.;
Dergachev, V.;
De Rosa, R.;
DeRosa, R. T.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Díaz, M.;
Dickson, J.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dolique, V.;
Dominguez, E.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Doravari, S.;
Douglas, R.;
Downes, T. P.;
Drago, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Du, Z.;
Ducrot, M.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edo, T.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Eggenstein, H. -B.;
Ehrens, P.;
Eichholz, J.;
Eikenberry, S. S.;
Endrőczi, G.;
Essick, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, X.;
Fang, Q.;
Farinon, S.;
Farr, B.;
Farr, W. M.;
Favata, M.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Fejer, M. M.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Feroz, F.;
Ferrante, I.;
Ferreira, E. C.;
Ferrini, F.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Fisher, R. P.;
Flaminio, R.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franco, S.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Gair, J. R.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Gaonkar, S.;
Garufi, F.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gemme, G.;
Gendre, B.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gleason, J.;
Goetz, E.;
Goetz, R.;
Gondan, L.;
González, G.;
Gordon, N.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Gossan, S.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Gräf, C.;
Graff, P. B.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Groot, P.;
Grote, H.;
Grover, K.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Guido, C. J.;
Gushwa, K.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Ha, J.;
Hall, E. D.;
Hamilton, W.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanke, M.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hannam, M. D.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hart, M.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haster, C. -J.;
Haughian, K.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heintze, M.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hemming, G.;
Hendry, M.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Heurs, M.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Hofman, D.;
Holt, K.;
Hopkins, P.;
Horrom, T.;
Hoske, D.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Hu, Y.;
Huerta, E.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Huynh, M.;
Huynh-Dinh, T.;
Idrisy, A.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Islas, G.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Iyer, B. R.;
Izumi, K.;
Jacobson, M.;
Jang, H.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Ji, Y.;
Jiménez-Forteza, F.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, R.;
Jonker, R. J. G.;
Ju, L.;
K, Haris;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kang, G.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Karlen, J.;
Kasprzack, M.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kaufer, H.;
Kaufer, S.;
Kaur, T.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kéfélian, F.;
Keiser, G. M.;
Keitel, D.;
Kelley, D. B.;
Kells, W.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, C.;
Kim, K.;
Kim, N. G.;
Kim, N.;
Kim, S.;
Kim, Y. -M.;
King, E. J.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kline, J.;
Koehlenbeck, S.;
Kokeyama, K.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalska, I.;
Kozak, D. B.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królak, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, A.;
Kumar, D. Nanda;
Kumar, P.;
Kumar, R.;
Kuo, L.;
Kutynia, A.;
Lam, P. K.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Larson, S.;
Lasky, P. D.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Lazzaro, C.;
Leaci, P.;
Leavey, S.;
Lebigot, E. O.;
Lee, C. H.;
Lee, H. K.;
Lee, H. M.;
Lee, J.;
Lee, P. J.;
Leonardi, M.;
Leong, J. R.;
Roux, A. Le;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Levin, Y.;
Levine, B.;
Lewis, J.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Libbrecht, K.;
Libson, A.;
Lin, A. C.;
Littenberg, T. B.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lockett, V.;
Lodhia, D.;
Loew, K.;
Logue, J.;
Lombardi, A. L.;
Lopez, E.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdo, G.;
Lough, J.;
Lubinski, M. J.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Ma, Y.;
Macdonald, E. P.;
MacDonald, T.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Magaña-Sandoval, F.;
Magee, R.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Maglione, C.;
Mailand, K.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Malvezzi, V.;
Man, N.;
Manca, G. M.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mangano, V.;
Mangini, N. M.;
Mansell, G.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Markosyan, A.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Martinelli, L.;
Martynov, D.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Massinger, T. J.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Mavalvala, N.;
May, G.;
Mazumder, N.;
Mazzolo, G.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McIver, J.;
McLin, K.;
Meacher, D.;
Meadors, G. D.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meidam, J.;
Meinders, M.;
Melatos, A.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Meyers, P. M.;
Mezzani, F.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Mikhailov, E. E.;
Milano, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mingarelli, C. M. F.;
Mishra, C.;
Mitra, S.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Moe, B.;
Moggi, A.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morriss, S. R.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow-Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, C. L.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Munch, J.;
Murphy, D.;
Murray, P. G.;
Mytidis, A.;
Nagy, M. F.;
Nardecchia, I.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nayak, R. K.;
Necula, V.;
Nelemans, G.;
Neri, I.;
Neri, M.;
Newton, G.;
Nguyen, T.;
Nielsen, A. B.;
Nissanke, S.;
Nitz, A. H.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Normandin, M. E. N.;
Nuttall, L. K.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Oelker, E.;
Oh, J. J.;
Oh, S. H.;
Ohme, F.;
Omar, S.;
Oppermann, P.;
Oram, R.;
O'Reilly, B.;
Ortega, W.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Padilla, C.;
Pai, A.;
Palashov, O.;
Palomba, C.;
Pan, H.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Paris, H.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pele, A.;
Penn, S.;
Perreca, A.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichot, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pierro, V.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Poeld, J.;
Poggiani, R.;
Poteomkin, A.;
Powell, J.;
Prasad, J.;
Predoi, V.;
Premachandra, S.;
Prestegard, T.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Pürrer, M.;
Qin, J.;
Quetschke, V.;
Quintero, E.;
Quitzow-James, R.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Raja, S.;
Rajalakshmi, G.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C.;
Ramirez, K.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Razzano, M.;
Re, V.;
Recchia, S.;
Reed, C. M.;
Regimbau, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Reula, O.;
Rhoades, E.;
Ricci, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Roddy, S. B.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J. G.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romano, R.;
Romanov, G.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińska, D.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Salemi, F.;
Sammut, L.;
Sandberg, V.;
Sanders, J. R.;
Sankar, S.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Saracco, E.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Scheuer, J.;
Schilling, R.;
Schilman, M.;
Schmidt, P.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schreiber, E.;
Schuette, D.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sequino, V.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shah, S.;
Shahriar, M. S.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shao, Z.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sidery, T. L.;
Siellez, K.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Simakov, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Singh, R.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, R. J. E.;
Smith-Lefebvre, N. D.;
Son, E. J.;
Sorazu, B.;
Souradeep, T.;
Staley, A.;
Stebbins, J.;
Steinke, M.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Stephens, B. C.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stevenson, S.;
Stone, R.;
Stops, D.;
Strain, K. A.;
Straniero, N.;
Strigin, S.;
Sturani, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tao, J.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, R.;
Tellez, G.;
Thirugnanasambandam, M. P.;
Thomas, M.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Tiwari, V.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Tomlinson, C.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torres, C. V.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Travasso, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Tse, M.;
Tshilumba, D.;
Tuennermann, H.;
Ugolini, D.;
Unnikrishnan, C. S.;
Urban, A. L.;
Usman, S. A.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vajente, G.;
Valdes, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
van Beuzekom, M.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Heijningen, J.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasúth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovato, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Venkateswara, K.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Viceré, A.;
Vincent-Finley, R.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vo, T.;
Vocca, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vousden, W. D.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Wade, A. R.;
Wade, L.;
Wade, M.;
Walker, M.;
Wallace, L.;
Walsh, S.;
Wang, M.;
Wang, X.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Weaver, B.;
Wei, L. -W.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Welborn, T.;
Wen, L.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D. J.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wiesner, K.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Williams, K.;
Williams, L.;
Williams, R.;
Williams, T. D.;
Williamson, A. R.;
Willis, J. L.;
Willke, B.;
Wimmer, M.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Wittel, H.;
Woan, G.;
Wolovick, N.;
Worden, J.;
Wu, Y.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yam, W.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yancey, C. C.;
Yang, H.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrożny, A.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zendri, J. -P.;
Zhang, Fan;
Zhang, L.;
Zhao, C.;
Zhu, H.;
Zhu, X. J.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zuraw, S.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Atteia, J. L.;
Cline, T.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Palmer, D.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Terada, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.
Submitted: 2014-03-26, last modified: 2014-04-17
We present the results of a search for gravitational waves associated with
223 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the InterPlanetary Network (IPN) in
2005-2010 during LIGO's fifth and sixth science runs and Virgo's first, second
and third science runs. The IPN satellites provide accurate times of the bursts
and sky localizations that vary significantly from degree scale to hundreds of
square degrees. We search for both a well-modeled binary coalescence signal,
the favored progenitor model for short GRBs, and for generic, unmodeled
gravitational wave bursts. Both searches use the event time and sky
localization to improve the gravitational-wave search sensitivity as compared
to corresponding all-time, all-sky searches. We find no evidence of a
gravitational-wave signal associated with any of the IPN GRBs in the sample,
nor do we find evidence for a population of weak gravitational-wave signals
associated with the GRBs. For all IPN-detected GRBs, for which a sufficient
duration of quality gravitational-wave data is available, we place lower bounds
on the distance to the source in accordance with an optimistic assumption of
gravitational-wave emission energy of $10^{-2}M_{\odot}c^2$ at 150 Hz, and find
a median of 13 Mpc. For the 27 short-hard GRBs we place 90% confidence
exclusion distances to two source models: a binary neutron star coalescence,
with a median distance of 12Mpc, or the coalescence of a neutron star and black
hole, with a median distance of 22 Mpc. Finally, we combine this search with
previously published results to provide a population statement for GRB searches
in first-generation LIGO and Virgo gravitational-wave detectors, and a
resulting examination of prospects for the advanced gravitational-wave
detectors.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.5734 [pdf] - 755152
The ultraluminous GRB 110918A
Frederiks, D. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Mangano, V.;
Oates, S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, Ph. P.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Kokomov, A. V.;
Cline, T. L.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Pagani, C.;
Sbarufatti, B.;
Siegel, M. H.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
Starr, R.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Goldstein, J.
Submitted: 2013-11-22
GRB 110918A is the brightest long GRB detected by Konus-WIND during its 19
years of continuous observations and the most luminous GRB ever observed since
the beginning of the cosmological era in 1997. We report on the final IPN
localization of this event and its detailed multiwavelength study with a number
of space-based instruments. The prompt emission is characterized by a typical
duration, a moderare $E_{peak}$ of the time-integrated spectrum, and strong
hard-to-soft evolution. The high observed energy fluence yields, at z=0.984, a
huge isotropic-equivalent energy release $E_{iso}=(2.1\pm0.1)\times10^{54}$
erg. The record-breaking energy flux observed at the peak of the short, bright,
hard initial pulse results in an unprecedented isotropic-equivalent luminosity
$L_{iso}=(4.7\pm0.2)\times10^{54}$erg s$^{-1}$. A tail of the soft gamma-ray
emission was detected with temporal and spectral behavior typical of that
predicted by the synchrotron forward-shock model. Swift/XRT and Swift/UVOT
observed the bright afterglow from 1.2 to 48 days after the burst and revealed
no evidence of a jet break. The post-break scenario for the afterglow is
preferred from our analysis, with a hard underlying electron spectrum and
ISM-like circumburst environment implied. We conclude that, among multiple
reasons investigated, the tight collimation of the jet must have been a key
ingredient to produce this unusually bright burst. The inferred jet opening
angle of 1.7-3.4 deg results in reasonable values of the collimation-corrected
radiated energy and the peak luminosity, which, however, are still at the top
of their distributions for such tightly collimated events. We estimate a
detection horizon for a similar ultraluminous GRB of $z\sim7.5$ for Konus-WIND,
and $z\sim12$ for Swift/BAT, which stresses the importance of GRBs as probes of
the early Universe.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1310.0313 [pdf] - 1179621
GRB 091024A and the nature of ultra-long gamma-ray bursts
Virgili, F. J.;
Mundell, C. G.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Margutti, R.;
Melandri, A.;
Harrison, R.;
Kobayashi, S.;
Chornock, R.;
Henden, A.;
Updike, A. C.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Steele, I. A.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Gomboc, A.;
Levan, A.;
Cano, Z.;
Mottram, C. J.;
Clay, N. R.;
Bersier, D.;
Kopac, D.;
Japelj, J.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Li, W.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Milne, P. A.;
Williams, G.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Fox, D. B.;
Berger, E.
Submitted: 2013-10-01, last modified: 2013-10-14
We present a broadband study of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 091024A within the
context of other ultra-long-duration GRBs. An unusually long burst detected by
Konus-Wind, Swift, and Fermi, GRB 091024A has prompt emission episodes covering
~1300 s, accompanied by bright and highly structured optical emission captured
by various rapid-response facilities, including the 2-m autonomous robotic
Faulkes North and Liverpool Telescopes, KAIT, S-LOTIS, and SRO. We also
observed the burst with 8- and 10-m class telescopes and determine the redshift
to be z = 1.0924 \pm 0.0004. We find no correlation between the optical and
gamma-ray peaks and interpret the optical light curve as being of external
origin, caused by the reverse and forward shock of a highly magnetized jet (R_B
~ 100-200). Low-level emission is detected throughout the near-background
quiescent period between the first two emission episodes of the Konus-Wind
data, suggesting continued central-engine activity; we discuss the implications
of this ongoing emission and its impact on the afterglow evolution and
predictions. We summarize the varied sample of historical GRBs with
exceptionally long durations in gamma-rays (>~ 1000 s) and discuss the
likelihood of these events being from a separate population; we suggest
ultra-long GRBs represent the tail of the duration distribution of the long GRB
population.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.4829 [pdf] - 616849
Extremely long hard bursts observed by Konus-Wind
Pal'shin, V.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Mazets, E.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Hurley, K.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Oleynik, P.;
Ulanov, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Starr, R.
Submitted: 2013-01-21
We report the observations of the prompt emission of the extremely long hard
burst, GRB 060814B, discovered by Konus-Wind and localized by the IPN. The
observations reveal a smooth, hard, ~40-min long pulse followed by weaker
emission seen several hours after the burst onset. We also present the
Konus-Wind data on similar burst, GRB 971208, localized by BATSE/IPN. And
finally we discuss the different possible origins of these unusual events.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.5636 [pdf] - 528994
Cosmic Gamma-ray Bursts Studies with Ioffe Institute Konus Experiments
Submitted: 2012-06-25
We present a short review of GRB studies performed for many years by Ioffe
Institute experiments onboard a number of space missions. The first
breakthrough in the studies of GRB was made possible by four Konus experiments
carried out by the Ioffe Institute onboard the Venera 11-14 deep space missions
from 1978 to 1983. A new important stage of our research is associated with the
joint Russian-American experiment with the Russian Konus scientific instrument
onboard the U.S. Wind spacecraft which has been successfully operating since
its launch in November 1994. The Konus-Wind experiment has made an impressive
number of important GRB observations and other astrophysical discoveries, due
to the advantages of its design and its interplanetary location. We also
briefly discuss future GRB experiments of the Ioffe Institute.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.1876 [pdf] - 1077880
Panchromatic Observations of SN 2011dh Point to a Compact Progenitor
Star
Soderberg, Alicia M.;
Margutti, R.;
Zauderer, B. A.;
Krauss, M.;
Katz, B.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Dittmann, J. A.;
Nakar, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Kawai, N.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Toizumi, T.;
Morii, M.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Gurwell, M.;
Petitpas, G.;
Rupen, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Fransson, C.;
Brunthaler, A.;
Bietenholz, M. F.;
Chugai, N.;
Grindlay, J.;
Copete, A.;
Connaughton, V.;
Briggs, M.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Rau, A.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.
Submitted: 2011-07-10, last modified: 2012-05-17
We report the discovery and detailed monitoring of X-ray emission associated
with the Type IIb SN 2011dh using data from the Swift and Chandra satellites,
placing it among the best studied X-ray supernovae to date. We further present
millimeter and radio data obtained with the SMA, CARMA, and EVLA during the
first three weeks after explosion. Combining these observations with early
optical photometry, we show that the panchromatic dataset is well-described by
non-thermal synchrotron emission (radio/mm) with inverse Compton scattering
(X-ray) of a thermal population of optical photons. In this scenario, the shock
partition fractions deviate from equipartition by a factor, (e_e/e_B) ~ 30. We
derive the properties of the shockwave and the circumstellar environment and
find a shock velocity, v~0.1c, and a progenitor mass loss rate of ~6e-5
M_sun/yr. These properties are consistent with the sub-class of Type IIb SNe
characterized by compact progenitors (Type cIIb) and dissimilar from those with
extended progenitors (Type eIIb). Furthermore, we consider the early optical
emission in the context of a cooling envelope model to estimate a progenitor
radius of ~1e+11 cm, in line with the expectations for a Type cIIb SN.
Together, these diagnostics are difficult to reconcile with the extended radius
of the putative yellow supergiant progenitor star identified in archival HST
observations, unless the stellar density profile is unusual. Finally, we
searched for the high energy shock breakout pulse using X-ray and gamma-ray
observations obtained during the purported explosion date range. Based on the
compact radius of the progenitor, we estimate that the breakout pulse was
detectable with current instruments but likely missed due to their limited
temporal/spatial coverage. [Abridged]
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.2363 [pdf] - 563775
SN 2010ay is a Luminous and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova within a
Low-metallicity Host Galaxy
Sanders, Nathan E.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Valenti, S.;
Foley, R. J.;
Chornock, R.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Berger, E.;
Smartt, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Levesque, E. M.;
Narayan, G.;
Kirshner, R. P.;
Botticella, M. T.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Terada, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Cline, T.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Chambers, K. C.;
Grav, T.;
Heasley, J. N.;
Hodapp, K. W.;
Jedicke, R.;
Kaiser, N.;
Kudritzki, R. -P.;
Luppino, G. A.;
Lupton, R. H.;
Magnier, E. A.;
Monet, D. G.;
Morgan, J. S.;
Onaka, P. M.;
Price, P. A.;
Stubbs, C. W.;
Tonry, J. L.;
Wainscoat, R. J.;
Waterson, M. F.
Submitted: 2011-10-11, last modified: 2012-04-05
We report on our serendipitous pre-discovery detection and detailed follow-up
of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova (SN) 2010ay at z = 0.067 imaged by the
Pan-STARRS1 3pi survey just ~4 days after explosion. The SN had a peak
luminosity, M_R ~ -20.2 mag, significantly more luminous than known GRB-SNe and
one of the most luminous SNe Ib/c ever discovered. The absorption velocity of
SN 2010ay is v_Si ~ 19,000 km/s at ~40 days after explosion, 2-5 times higher
than other broad-lined SNe and similar to the GRB-SN 2010bh at comparable
epochs. Moreover, the velocity declines ~2 times slower than other SNe Ic-BL
and GRB-SNe. Assuming that the optical emission is powered by radioactive
decay, the peak magnitude implies the synthesis of an unusually large mass of
56 Ni, M_Ni = 0.9 M_solar. Modeling of the light-curve points to a total ejecta
mass, M_ej ~ 4.7 M_sol, and total kinetic energy, E_K ~ 11x10^51 ergs. The
ratio of M_Ni to M_ej is ~2 times as large for SN 2010ay as typical GRB-SNe and
may suggest an additional energy reservoir. The metallicity (log(O/H)_PP04 + 12
= 8.19) of the explosion site within the host galaxy places SN 2010ay in the
low-metallicity regime populated by GRB-SNe, and ~0.5(0.2) dex lower than that
typically measured for the host environments of normal (broad-lined) Ic
supernovae. We constrain any gamma-ray emission with E_gamma < 6x10^{48} erg
(25-150 keV) and our deep radio follow-up observations with the Expanded Very
Large Array rule out relativistic ejecta with energy, E > 10^48 erg. We
therefore rule out the association of a relativistic outflow like those which
accompanied SN 1998bw and traditional long-duration GRBs, but place
less-stringent constraints on a weak afterglow like that seen from XRF 060218.
These observations challenge the importance of progenitor metallicity for the
production of a GRB, and suggest that other parameters also play a key role.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1111.2922 [pdf] - 730987
Unusual Central Engine Activity in the Double Burst GRB 110709B
Zhang, Bin-Bin;
Burrows, David;
Zhang, Bing;
Meszaros, Peter;
Wang, Xiang-Yu;
Stratta, Giulia;
D'Elia, Valerio;
Frederiks, Dmitry;
Golenetskii, Sergey;
Cummings, Jay R.;
Norris, Jay P.;
Falcone, Abraham;
Barthelmy, Scott D.;
Gehrels, Neil
Submitted: 2011-11-12, last modified: 2012-01-16
The double burst, GRB 110709B, triggered Swift/BAT twice at 21:32:39 UT and
21:43:45 UT, respectively, on 9 July 2011. This is the first time we observed a
GRB with two BAT triggers. In this paper, we present simultaneous Swift and
Konus-WIND observations of this unusual GRB and its afterglow. If the two
events originated from the same physical progenitor, their different
time-dependent spectral evolution suggests they must belong to different
episodes of the central engine, which may be a magnetar-to-BH accretion system.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4050 [pdf] - 1078110
Extended Tails from SGR 1806-20 Bursts
Submitted: 2011-07-20
In 2004, SGR 1806-20 underwent a period of intense and long-lasting burst
activity that included the giant flare of 27 December 2004 -- the most intense
extra-solar transient event ever detected at Earth. During this active episode,
we routinely monitored the source with Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer and
occasionally with Chandra. During the course of these observations, we
identified two relatively bright bursts observed with Konus-Wind in hard X-rays
that were followed by extended X-ray tails or afterglows lasting hundreds to
thousands of seconds. Here, we present detailed spectral and temporal analysis
of these events observed about 6 and 1.5 months prior to the 27 December 2004
Giant Flare. We find that both X-ray tails are consistent with a cooling
blackbody of constant radius. These spectral results are qualitatively similar
to those of the burst afterglows recorded from SGR 1900+14 and recently from
SGR 1550-5418. However, the latter two sources exhibit significant increase in
their pulsed X-ray intensity following the burst, while we did not detect any
significant changes in the RMS pulsed amplitude during the SGR 1806-20 events.
Moreover, we find that the fraction of energy partitioned to the burst (prompt
energy release) and the tail (afterglow) differs by an order of magnitude
between SGR 1900+14 and SGR 1806-20. We suggest that such differences can be
attributed to differences in the crustal heating mechanism of these neutron
stars combined with the geometry of the emitting areas.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.1301 [pdf] - 1041767
Spectral Cross-calibration of the Konus-Wind, the Suzaku/WAM, and the
Swift/BAT Data using Gamma-Ray Bursts
Sakamoto, T.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Sato, G.;
Aptekar, R.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Baumgartner, W.;
Cummings, J.;
Fenimore, E.;
Frederiks, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Krimm, H.;
Markwardt, C.;
Onda, K.;
Palmer, D.;
Parsons, A.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Sugita, S.;
Tashiro, M.;
Tueller, J.;
Ukwatta, T.
Submitted: 2010-11-04
We report on the spectral cross-calibration results of the Konus-Wind, the
Suzaku/WAM, and the Swift/BAT instruments using simultaneously observed
gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). This is the first attempt to use simultaneously
observed GRBs as a spectral calibration source to understand systematic
problems among the instruments. Based on these joint spectral fits, we find
that 1) although a constant factor (a normalization factor) agrees within 20%
among the instruments, the BAT constant factor shows a systematically smaller
value by 10-20% compared to that of Konus-Wind, 2) there is a systematic trend
that the low-energy photon index becomes steeper by 0.1-0.2 and Epeak becomes
systematically higher by 10-20% when including the BAT data in the joint fits,
and 3) the high-energy photon index agrees within 0.2 among the instruments.
Our results show that cross-calibration based on joint spectral analysis is an
important step to understanding the instrumental effects which could be
affecting the scientific results from the GRB prompt emission data.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:0907.2709 [pdf] - 231069
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the HETE-2 Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalog
Hurley, K.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Barthelmy, K. Harshman S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, C. E.;
Rossi, F.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, R. Starr J.;
Gold, R.
Submitted: 2009-07-15, last modified: 2010-09-22
Between 2000 November and 2006 May, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network (IPN) detected 226 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were
also detected by the FREGATE experiment aboard the HETE-II spacecraft. During
this period, the IPN consisted of up to nine spacecraft, and using
triangulation, the localizations of 157 bursts were obtained. We present the
IPN localization data on these events.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.5300 [pdf] - 1034006
The Mouse that Roared: A Superflare from the dMe Flare Star EV Lac
detected by Swift and Konus-Wind
Osten, Rachel A.;
Godet, Olivier;
Drake, Stephen;
Tueller, Jack;
Cummings, Jay;
Krimm, Hans;
Pye, John;
Pal'shin, Valentin;
Golenetskii, Sergei;
Reale, Fabio;
Oates, Samantha R.;
Page, Mat J.;
Melandri, Andrea
Submitted: 2010-07-29
We report on a large stellar flare from the nearby dMe flare star EV Lac
observed by the Swift and Konus-Wind satellites and the Liverpool Telescope. It
is the first large stellar flare from a dMe flare star to result in a Swift
trigger based on its hard X-ray intensity. Its peak f_X from 0.3--100 keV of
5.3x10^-8 erg/cm2/s is nearly 7000 times larger than the star's quiescent
coronal flux, and the change in magnitude in the white filter is >4.7. This
flare also caused a transient increase in EV Lac's bolometric luminosity
(L_bol) during the early stages of the flare, with a peak estimated L_X/L_bol
~3.1. We apply flare loop hydrodynamic modeling to the plasma parameter
temporal changes to derive a loop semi-length of l/Rstar =0.37 +/-0.07. The
soft X-ray spectrum of the flare reveals evidence of iron Kalpha emission at
6.4 keV. We model the Kalpha emission as fluorescence from the hot flare source
irradiating the photospheric iron, and derive loop heights of h/Rstar=0.1,
consistent within factors of a few with the heights inferred from hydrodynamic
modeling. The Kalpha emission feature shows variability on time scales of ~200
s which is difficult to interpret using the pure fluorescence hypothesis. We
examine Kalpha emission produced by collisional ionization from accelerated
particles, and find parameter values for the spectrum of accelerated particles
which can accommodate the increased amount of Kalpha flux and the lack of
observed nonthermal emission in the 20-50 keV spectral region.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.1650 [pdf] - 1026226
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalogs
Hurley, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.
Submitted: 2010-04-09
Between 1996 July and 2002 April, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network detected 787 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were also
detected by the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and/or Wide-Field X-Ray Camera
experiments aboard the BeppoSAX spacecraft. During this period, the network
consisted of up to six spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations
of 475 bursts were obtained. We present the localization data for these events.
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:0911.5544 [pdf] - 1018545
Discovery of a new Soft Gamma Repeater: SGR J0418+5729
van der Horst, A. J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Gogus, E.;
Kaneko, Y.;
Wachter, S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Granot, J.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Woods, P. M.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J. R.;
Finger, M. H.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Gelino, C. R.;
Gelino, D. M.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Hurley, K.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mazets, E. P.;
McEnery, J. E.;
Meegan, C. A.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Svinkin, D.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
van der Klis, M.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Watts, A. L.;
Wilson-Hodge, C. A.
Submitted: 2009-11-30, last modified: 2010-01-19
On 2009 June 5, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) onboard the Fermi Gamma-ray
Space Telescope triggered on two short, and relatively dim bursts with spectral
properties similar to Soft Gamma Repeater (SGR) bursts. Independent
localizations of the bursts by triangulation with the Konus-RF and with the
Swift satellite, confirmed their origin from the same, previously unknown,
source. The subsequent discovery of X-ray pulsations with the Rossi X-ray
Timing Explorer (RXTE), confirmed the magnetar nature of the new source, SGR
J0418+5729. We describe here the Fermi/GBM observations, the discovery and the
localization of this new SGR, and our infrared and Chandra X-ray observations.
We also present a detailed temporal and spectral study of the two GBM bursts.
SGR J0418+5729 is the second source discovered in the same region of the sky in
the last year, the other one being SGR J0501+4516. Both sources lie in the
direction of the galactic anti-center and presumably at the nearby distance of
~2 kpc (assuming they reside in the Perseus arm of our galaxy). The
near-threshold GBM detection of bursts from SGR J0418+5729 suggests that there
may be more such dim SGRs throughout our galaxy, possibly exceeding the
population of bright SGRs. Finally, using sample statistics, we conclude that
the implications of the new SGR discovery on the number of observable active
magnetars in our galaxy at any given time is <10, in agreement with our earlier
estimates.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:0902.3391 [pdf] - 315634
Konus-Wind observations of the new soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 0501+4516
Submitted: 2009-02-19, last modified: 2009-05-12
In 2008 August, the new soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 0501+4516 was discovered
by Swift. The source was soon confirmed by several groups in space- and
ground-based multi-wavelength observations. In this letter we report the
analysis of five short bursts from the recently discovered SGR, detected with
Konus-Wind gamma-ray burst spectrometer. Properties of the time histories of
the observed events, as well as results of multi-channel spectral analysis,
both in the 20--300 keV energy range, show, that the source exhibits itself as
a typical SGR. The bursts durations are <0.75 s and their spectra above 20 keV
can be fitted by optically-thin thermal bremsstrahlung (OTTB) model with kT of
20--40 keV. The spectral evolution is observed, which resembles the SGR 1627-41
bursts, where a strong hardness-intensity correlation was noticed in the
earlier Konus-Wind observations. The peak energy fluxes of all five events are
comparable to highest those for known SGRs, so a less distant source is
implied, consistent with the determined Galactic anti-center direction.
Supposing the young supernova remnant HB9 (at the distance of 1.5 kpc) as a
natal environment of the source, the peak luminosities of the bursts are
estimated to be (2--5)x10^{40} erg s-1. The values of the total energy release,
given the same assumptions, amount to (0.6--6)x10^{39} erg. These estimations
of both parameters are typical for short SGR bursts.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:0805.1557 [pdf] - 163055
GRB 080319B: A Naked-Eye Stellar Blast from the Distant Universe
Racusin, J. L.;
Karpov, S. V.;
Sokolowski, M.;
Granot, J.;
Wu, X. F.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Covino, S.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Oates, S. R.;
Schady, P.;
Smith, R. J.;
Cummings, J.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Piotrowski, L. W.;
Zhang, B.;
Evans, P. A.;
Holland, S. T.;
Malek, K.;
Page, M. T.;
Vetere, L.;
Margutti, R.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Kamble, A.;
Curran, P. A.;
Beardmore, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Mankiewicz, L.;
Melandri, A.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Page, K. L.;
Piran, T.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Wrochna, G.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Bartolini, C.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beskin, G. M.;
Bondar, S.;
Campana, S.;
Cucchiara, A.;
Cwiok, M.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Elia, V.;
Della Valle, M.;
Dominik, W.;
Falcone, A.;
Fiore, F.;
Fox, D. B.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Fruchter, A. S.;
Fugazza, D.;
Garrett, M.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Gomboc, A.;
Greco, G.;
Guarnieri, A.;
Immler, S.;
Kasprowicz, G.;
Levan, A. J.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Molinari, E.;
Moretti, A.;
Nawrocki, K.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Pagani, C.;
Paragi, Z.;
Perri, M.;
Piccioni, A.;
Ramirez-Ruiz, E.;
Roming, P. W. A.;
Steele, I. A.;
Strom, R. G.;
Testa, V.;
Tosti, G.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Wiersema, K.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Zarnecki, A. F.;
Zerbi, F.;
Meszaros, P.;
Chincarini, G.;
Burrows, D. N.
Submitted: 2008-05-11
Long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) release copious amounts of energy
across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, and so provide a window into the
process of black hole formation from the collapse of a massive star. Over the
last forty years, our understanding of the GRB phenomenon has progressed
dramatically; nevertheless, fortuitous circumstances occasionally arise that
provide access to a regime not yet probed. GRB 080319B presented such an
opportunity, with extraordinarily bright prompt optical emission that peaked at
a visual magnitude of 5.3, making it briefly visible with the naked eye. It was
captured in exquisite detail by wide-field telescopes, imaging the burst
location from before the time of the explosion. The combination of these unique
optical data with simultaneous gamma-ray observations provides powerful
diagnostics of the detailed physics of this explosion within seconds of its
formation. Here we show that the prompt optical and gamma-ray emissions from
this event likely arise from different spectral components within the same
physical region located at a large distance from the source, implying an
extremely relativistic outflow. The chromatic behaviour of the broadband
afterglow is consistent with viewing the GRB down the very narrow inner core of
a two-component jet that is expanding into a wind-like environment consistent
with the massive star origin of long GRBs. These circumstances can explain the
extreme properties of this GRB.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1502 [pdf] - 359849
A Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the Andromeda Galaxy, M31
Submitted: 2007-12-10
The light curve, energy spectra, energetics, and IPN localization of an
exceedingly intense short duration hard spectrum burst, GRB 070201, obtained
from Konus-Wind, INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), and MESSENGER data are presented. The
total fluence of the burst and the peak flux are $S = 2.00_{-0.26}^{+0.10}
\times 10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ and $F_{max} = 1.61_{-0.50}^{+0.29} \times
10^{-3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The IPN error box has an area of 446 square
arcminutes and covers the peripheral part of the M31 galaxy. Assuming that the
source of the burst is indeed in M31 at a distance of 0.78 Mpc, the measured
values of the fluence $S$ and maximum flux $F_{max}$ correspond to a total
energy of $Q = 1.5 \times 10^{45}$ erg, and a maximum luminosity $L = 1.2
\times 10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$. These data are in good agreement with the
corresponding characteristics of the previously observed giant flares from
other soft gamma repeaters. The evidence for the identification of this event
as a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M31 galaxy is presented.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612494 [pdf] - 260839
Panchromatic study of GRB 060124: from precursor to afterglow
Romano, P.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Cummings, J.;
Cusumano, G.;
Holland, S. T.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Page, K. L.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Rol, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Zhang, B.;
Aptekar, R.;
Barbier, S.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Boyd, P.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Frederiks, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Goad, M. R.;
Godet, O.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Guetta, D.;
Kennea, J. A.;
La Parola, V.;
Malesani, D.;
Marshall, F.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2006-12-18, last modified: 2007-07-06
We present observations of GRB 060124, the first event for which both the
prompt and the afterglow emission could be observed simultaneously and in their
entirety by the three Swift instruments and by Konus-Wind. Thanks to these
exceptional circumstances, the temporal and spectral properties of the prompt
emission could be studied in the optical, X-ray and gamma-ray ranges (up to 2
MeV). While the X-ray emission (0.2-10 keV) clearly tracks the gamma-ray burst,
the optical component follows a different pattern, likely indicating a
different origin, possibly the onset of external shocks. The prompt GRB
spectrum shows significant spectral evolution, with both the peak energy and
the spectral index varying. As observed in several long GRBs, significant lags
are measured between the hard- and low-energy components, showing that this
behaviour extends over 3 decades in energy. The GRB peaks are also much broader
at soft energies. This is related to the temporal evolution of the spectrum,
and can be accounted for by the softening of the electron spectral index with
time. The burst energy (E_iso~5x10^{53} erg at z=2.297) and average peak energy
(E_p~300 keV) make GRB 060124 consistent with the Amati relation. The X-ray
afterglow is characterized by a decay which presents a break at t_b~10^5s.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:0704.1609 [pdf] - 1453788
GRB 061121: Broadband spectral evolution through the prompt and
afterglow phases of a bright burst
Page, K. L.;
Willingale, R.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Zhang, B.;
Godet, O.;
Marshall, F. E.;
Melandri, A.;
Norris, J. P.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Rol, E.;
Romano, P.;
Starling, R. L. C.;
Schady, P.;
Yost, S. A.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Cusumano, G.;
Burrows, D. N.;
De Pasquale, M.;
Ehle, M.;
Evans, P. A.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goad, M. R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Mundell, C.;
Page, M. J.;
Ricker, G.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Schaefer, B. E.;
Stamatikos, M.;
Troja, E.;
Ulanov, M.;
Yuan, F.;
Ziaeepour, H.
Submitted: 2007-04-12
Swift triggered on a precursor to the main burst of GRB 061121 (z=1.314),
allowing observations to be made from the optical to gamma-ray bands. Many
other telescopes, including Konus-Wind, XMM-Newton, ROTSE and the Faulkes
Telescope North, also observed the burst. The gamma-ray, X-ray and UV/optical
emission all showed a peak ~75s after the trigger, although the optical and
X-ray afterglow components also appear early on - before, or during, the main
peak. Spectral evolution was seen throughout the burst, with the prompt
emission showing a clear positive correlation between brightness and hardness.
The Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of the prompt emission, stretching from
1eV up to 1MeV, is very flat, with a peak in the flux density at ~1keV. The
optical-to-X-ray spectra at this time are better fitted by a broken, rather
than single, power-law, similar to previous results for X-ray flares. The SED
shows spectral hardening as the afterglow evolves with time. This behaviour
might be a symptom of self-Comptonisation, although circumstellar densities
similar to those found in the cores of molecular clouds would be required. The
afterglow also decays too slowly to be accounted for by the standard models.
Although the precursor and main emission show different spectral lags, both are
consistent with the lag-luminosity correlation for long bursts. GRB 061121 is
the instantaneously brightest long burst yet detected by Swift. Using a
combination of Swift and Konus-Wind data, we estimate an isotropic energy of
2.8x10^53 erg over 1keV - 10MeV in the GRB rest frame. A probable jet break is
detected at ~2x10^5s, leading to an estimate of ~10^51 erg for the
beaming-corrected gamma-ray energy.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0612289 [pdf] - 87627
Giant Flare in SGR 1806-20 and Its Compton Reflection from the Moon
Submitted: 2006-12-12
We analyze the data obtained when the Konus-Wind gamma-ray spectrometer
detected a giant flare in SGR 1806-20 on December 27, 2004. The flare is
similar in appearance to the two known flares in SGR 0526-66 and SGR 1900+14
while exceeding them significantly in intensity. The enormous X-ray and
gamma-ray flux in the narrow initial pulse of the flare leads to almost
instantaneous deep saturation of the gamma-ray detectors, ruling out the
possibility of directly measuring the intensity, time profile, and energy
spectrum of the initial pulse. In this situation, the detection of an
attenuated signal of Compton back-scattering of the initial pulse emission by
the Moon with the Helicon gamma-ray spectrometer onboard the Coronas-F
satellite was an extremely favorable circumstance. Analysis of this signal has
yielded the most reliable temporal, energy, and spectral characteristics of the
pulse. The temporal and spectral characteristics of the pulsating flare tail
have been determined from Konus-Wind data. Its soft spectra have been found to
contain also a hard power-law component extending to 10 MeV. A weak afterglow
of SGR 1806-20 decaying over several hours is traceable up to 1 MeV. We also
consider the overall picture of activity of SGR 1806-20 in the emission of
recurrent bursts before and after the giant flare.
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0609544 [pdf] - 85136
On the Possibility of Identification of a Short/Hard Burst GRB 051103
with the Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the M81 Group of Galaxies
Submitted: 2006-09-19, last modified: 2006-09-22
The light curve, energy characteristics, and localization of a short/hard GRB
051103 burst are considered. Evidence in favor of identifying this event with a
giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the nearby M81 group of interacting
galaxies is discussed.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0608183 [pdf] - 163533
Multi-Wavelength Observations of GRB 050820A: An Exceptionally Energetic
Event Followed from Start to Finish
Cenko, S. B.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Harrison, F. A.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frail, D. A.;
Cameron, P. B.;
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. B.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Moon, D. -S.;
Nakar, E.;
Ofek, E. O.;
Penprase, B. E.;
Price, P. A.;
Sari, R.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Gehrels, N.;
McCarthy, P. J.;
Nousek, J. A.;
Persson, S. E.;
Piran, T.
Submitted: 2006-08-08
We present observations of the unusually bright and long gamma-ray burst GRB
050820A, one of the best-sampled broadband data sets in the Swift era. The
gamma-ray light curve is marked by a soft precursor pulse some 200 s before the
main event; the lack of any intervening emission suggests that it is due to a
physical mechanism distinct from the GRB itself. The large time lag between the
precursor and the main emission enabled simultaneous observations in the
gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical band-passes, something only achieved for a
handful of events to date. While the contemporaneous X-rays are the low-energy
tail of the prompt emission, the optical does not directly track the gamma-ray
flux. Instead, the early-time optical data appear mostly consistent with the
forward shock synchrotron peak passing through the optical, and are therefore
likely the beginning of the afterglow. On hour time scales after the burst, the
X-ray and optical light curves are inconsistent with an adiabatic expansion of
the shock into the surrounding region, but rather indicate that there is a
period of energy injection. Observations at late times allow us to constrain
the collimation angle of the relativistic outflow to theta = 6.8 - 9.3 degrees.
Our estimates of both the kinetic energy of the afterglow and the prompt
gamma-ray energy release make GRB 050820A one of the most energetic events for
which such values could be determined.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605005 [pdf] - 81693
GRB 060313: A New Paradigm for Short-Hard Bursts?
Roming, Peter W. A.;
Berk, Daniel Vanden;
Palshin, Valentin;
Pagani, Claudio;
Norris, Jay;
Kumar, Pawan;
Krimm, Hans;
Holland, Stephen T.;
Gronwall, Caryl;
Blustin, A lex J.;
Zhang, Bing;
Schady, Patricia;
Sakamoto, Takanori;
Osborne, Julian P.;
Nousek, John A.;
Marshall, Frank E.;
Meszaros, Peter;
Golenetskii, Sergey V.;
Gehrels, Neil;
Frederiks, Dmitry D.;
Campana, Sergio;
Burrows, David N.;
Boyd, Patricia T.;
Barthelmy, Scott;
Aptekar, R. L.
Submitted: 2006-04-28, last modified: 2006-08-03
We report the simultaneous observations of the prompt emission in the
gamma-ray and hard X-ray bands by the Swift-BAT and the KONUS-Wind instruments
of the short-hard burst, GRB 060313. The observations reveal multiple peaks in
both the gamma-ray and hard X-ray bands suggesting a highly variable outflow
from the central explosion. We also describe the early-time observations of the
X-ray and UV/Optical afterglows by the Swift XRT and UVOT instruments. The
combination of the X-ray and UV/Optical observations provide the most
comprehensive lightcurves to date of a short-hard burst at such an early epoch.
The afterglows exhibit complex structure with different decay indices and
flaring. This behavior can be explained by the combination of a structured jet,
radiative loss of energy, and decreasing microphysics parameters occurring in a
circum-burst medium with densities varying by a factor of approximately two on
a length scale of 10^17 cm. These density variations are normally associated
with the environment of a massive star and inhomogeneities in its windy medium.
However, the mean density of the observed medium (n approximately 10^−4
cm^3) is much less than that expected for a massive star. Although the collapse
of a massive star as the origin of GRB 060313 is unlikely, the merger of a
compact binary also poses problems for explaining the behavior of this burst.
Two possible suggestions for explaining this scenario are: some short bursts
may arise from a mechanism that does not invoke the conventional compact binary
model, or soft late-time central engine activity is producing UV/optical but no
X-ray flaring.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0602497 [pdf] - 133747
Panchromatic study of GRB 060124: from precursor to afterglow
Romano, P.;
Campana, S.;
Chincarini, G.;
Cummings, J.;
Cusumano, G.;
Holland, S. T.;
Mangano, V.;
Mineo, T.;
Page, K. L.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Rol, E.;
Sakamoto, T.;
Zhang, B.;
Aptekar, R.;
Barbier, S.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Beardmore, A. P.;
Boyd, P.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Capalbi, M.;
Fenimore, E. E.;
Frederiks, D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Goad, M. R.;
Godet, O.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Guetta, D.;
Kennea, J. A.;
La Parola, V.;
Malesani, D.;
Marshall, F.;
Moretti, A.;
Nousek, J. A.;
O'Brien, P. T.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Perri, M.;
Tagliaferri, G.
Submitted: 2006-02-23, last modified: 2006-06-13
We present observations of GRB 060124, the first event for which both the
prompt and the afterglow emission could be observed simultaneously and in their
entirety by the three Swift instruments. Indeed, Swift-BAT triggered on a
precursor ~570s before the main burst peak, and this allowed Swift to repoint
the narrow field instruments to the burst position ~350s before the main burst
occurred. GRB 060124 also triggered Konus-Wind, which observed the prompt
emission in a harder gamma-ray band (up to 2MeV). Thanks to these exceptional
circumstances, the temporal and spectral properties of the prompt emission can
be studied in the optical, X-ray and gamma-ray ranges. While the X-ray emission
(0.2-10keV) clearly tracks the gamma-ray burst, the optical component follows a
different pattern, likely indicating a different origin, possibly the onset of
external shocks. The prompt GRB spectrum shows significant spectral evolution,
with both the peak energy and the spectral index varying. As observed in
several long GRBs, significant lags are measured between the hard- and
low-energy components, showing that this behaviour extends over 3 decades in
energy. The GRB peaks are also much broader at soft energies. This is related
to the temporal evolution of the spectrum, and can be accounted for by assuming
that the electron spectral index softened with time. The burst energy
(E_iso~5x10^{53} erg) and average peak energy (E_p~300keV) make GRB 060124
consistent with the Amati relation. The X-ray afterglow is characterized by a
decay which presents a break at t_b~10^5s.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605717 [pdf] - 1233802
Are Short GRBs Really Hard?
Sakamoto, T.;
Barbier, L.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Fenimore, E.;
Gehrels, N.;
Hullinger, D.;
Krimm, H.;
Markwardt, C.;
Palmer, D.;
Parsons, A.;
Sato, G.;
Tueller, J.;
Aptekar, R.;
Cline, T.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Ricker, G.;
Lamb, D.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Kawai, N.
Submitted: 2006-05-30
Thanks to the rapid position notice and response by HETE-2 and Swift, the
X-ray afterglow emissions have been found for four recent short gamma-ray
bursts (GRBs; GRB 050509b, GRB 050709, GRB 050724, and GRB 050813). The
positions of three out of four short GRBs are coincident with galaxies with no
current or recent star formation. This discovery tightens the case for a
different origin for short and long GRBs. On the other hand, from the prompt
emission point of view, a short GRB shows a harder spectrum comparing to that
of the long duration GRBs according to the BATSE observations. We investigate
the prompt emission properties of four short GRBs observed by Swift/BAT. We
found that the hardness of all four BAT short GRBs is in between the BATSE
range for short and long GRBs. We will discuss the spectral properties of short
GRBs including the short GRB sample of Konus-Wind and HETE-2 to understand the
hard nature of the BATSE short GRBs.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0605507 [pdf] - 133756
GRB 050717: A Long, Short-Lag, High Peak Energy Burst Observed by Swift
and Konus
Krimm, H. A.;
Hurkett, C.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Norris, J. P.;
Zhang, B.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Burrows, D. N.;
Gehrels, N.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Parsons, A. M.;
Perri, M.;
Willingale, R.
Submitted: 2006-05-19
The long burst GRB 050717 was observed simultaneously by the Burst Alert
Telescope (BAT) on Swift and the Konus instrument on Wind. Significant hard to
soft spectral evolution was seen. Early gamma-ray and X-ray emission was
detected by both BAT and the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) on Swift. The XRT continued
to observe the burst for 7.1 days and detect it for 1.4 days. The X-ray light
curve showed a classic decay pattern; the afterglow was too faint for a jet
break to be detected. No optical, infrared or ultraviolet counterpart was
discovered despite deep searches within 14 hours of the burst. Two particular
features of the prompt emission make GRB 050717 a very unusual burst. First,
the peak of the nu Fnu spectrum was observed to be 2401(-568/+781) keV for the
main peak, which is the highest value of Epeak ever observed. Secondly, the
spectral lag for GRB 050717 was determined to be 2.5 +- 2.6 ms, consistent with
zero and unusually short for a long burst. This lag measurement suggests that
this burst has a high intrinsic luminosity and hence is at high redshift (z >
2.7). Despite these unusual features GRB 050717 exhibits the classic prompt and
afterglow behaviour of a gamma-ray burst.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509424 [pdf] - 76006
Multi-Wavelength Studies of the Optically Dark Gamma-Ray Burst 001025A
Pedersen, K.;
Hurley, K.;
Hjorth, J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Andersen, M. I.;
Christensen, L.;
Cline, T.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Jensen, B. L.;
Milvang-Jensen, B.;
McClanahan, T.;
Moller, P.;
Palshin, V.;
Schartel, N.;
Trombka, J.;
Ulanov, M.;
Watson, D.
Submitted: 2005-09-15
We identify the fading X-ray afterglow of GRB 001025A from XMM-Newton
observations obtained 1.9-2.3 days, 2 years, and 2.5 years after the burst. The
non-detection of an optical counterpart to an upper limit of R=25.5, 1.20 days
after the burst, makes GRB 001025A a ``dark'' burst. Based on the X-ray
afterglow spectral properties of GRB 001025A, we argue that some bursts appear
optically dark because their afterglow is faint and their cooling frequency is
close to the X-ray band. This interpretation is applicable to several of the
few other dark bursts where the X-ray spectral index has been measured. The
X-ray afterglow flux of GRB 001025A is an order of magnitude lower than for
typical long-duration gamma-ray bursts. The spectrum of the X-ray afterglow can
be fitted with an absorbed synchrotron emission model, an absorbed thermal
plasma model, or a combination thereof. For the latter, an extrapolation to
optical wavelengths can be reconciled with the R-band upper limit on the
afterglow, without invoking any optical circumburst absorption, provided the
cooling frequency is close to the X-ray band. Alternatively, if the X-ray
afterglow is due to synchrotron emission only, seven magnitudes of extinction
in the observed R-band is required to meet the R-band upper limit, making GRB
001025A much more obscured than bursts with detected optical afterglows. Based
on the column density of X-ray absorbing circumburst matter, an SMC gas-to-dust
ratio is insufficient to produce this amount of extinction. The X-ray tail of
the prompt emission enters a steep temporal decay excluding that the tail of
the prompt emission is the onset of the afterglow (abridged).
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0502541 [pdf] - 71332
The Konus-Wind and Helicon-Coronas-F detection of the giant $\gamma$-ray
flare from the soft $\gamma$-ray repeater SGR 1806-20
Submitted: 2005-02-25
The giant outburst from SGR 1806-20 was observed on 2004 December 27 by many
spacecraft. This extremely rare event exhibits a striking similarity to the two
giant outbursts thus far observed, on 1979 March 5 from SGR 0526-66 and 1998
August 27 from SGR 1900+14. All the three outbursts start with a short giant
radiation pulse followed by a weaker tail. The tail pulsates with the period of
neutron star rotation of $\sim$5--8 s, to decay finally in a few minutes. The
enormous intensity of the initial pulse proved to be far above the saturation
level of the gamma-ray detectors, with the result that the most valuable data
on the time structure and energy spectrum of the pulse is lost. At the time of
the December 27 outburst, a Russian spacecraft Coronas-F with a $\gamma$-ray
spectrometer aboard was occulted by the Earth and could not see the outburst.
It succeeded, however, in observing a weak reflected signal due to the
$\gamma$-rays Compton scattered by the Moon. This has been the first
observation of a cosmic gamma-ray flare reflected from a celestial body. Here
we report, that the detection of a weakened back-scattered initial pulse
combined with direct observations by the Konus $\gamma$-ray spectrometer on the
Wind spacecraft permitted us to reliably reconstruct the intensity, time
history, and energy spectra of the outburst.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409053 [pdf] - 67134
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BATSE Catalogs of
Untriggered Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Stern, B.;
Kommers, J.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Montanari, E.;
Lewin, W.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Sinha, S.;
Seetha, S.
Submitted: 2004-09-02, last modified: 2004-10-11
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) detection and localization
information for 211 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed as untriggered events by
the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE), and published in catalogs by
Kommers et al. (2001) and Stern et al. (2001). IPN confirmations have been
obtained by analyzing the data from 11 experiments. For any given burst
observed by BATSE and one other distant spacecraft, arrival time analysis (or
``triangulation'') results in an annulus of possible arrival directions whose
half-width varies between 14 arcseconds and 5.6 degrees, depending on the
intensity, time history, and arrival direction of the burst, as well as the
distance between the spacecraft. This annulus generally intersects the BATSE
error circle, resulting in a reduction of the area of up to a factor of ~650.
When three widely separated spacecraft observed a burst, the result is an error
box whose area is as much as 30000 times smaller than that of the BATSE error
circle.
Because the IPN instruments are considerably less sensitive than BATSE, they
generally did not detect the weakest untriggered bursts, but did detect the
more intense ones which failed to trigger BATSE when the trigger was disabled.
In a few cases, we have been able to identify the probable origin of bursts as
soft gamma repeaters. The vast majority of the IPN-detected events, however,
are GRBs, and the confirmation of them validates many of the procedures
utilized to detect BATSE untriggered bursts.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0403450 [pdf] - 63641
GRB 020410: A Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow Discovered by its Supernova
Light
Levan, A.;
Nugent, P.;
Fruchter, A.;
Burud, I;
Branch, D.;
Rhoads, J.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro;
Thorsett, S. E.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Garnavich, P.;
Holland, S. T.;
Hjorth, J.;
Moller, P.;
Pian, E.;
Tanvir, N.;
Ulanov, M.;
Wijers, R. A. M. J.;
Woosley, S.
Submitted: 2004-03-18
We present the discovery and monitoring of the optical transient (OT)
associated with GRB 020410. The fading OT was found by Hubble Space Telescope
(HST) observations taken 28 and 65 days after burst at a position consistent
with the X-ray afterglow. Subsequent re-examination of early ground based
observations revealed that a faint OT was present 6 hours after burst,
confirming the source association with GRB 020410. A deep non-detection after
one week requires that the OT re-brightened between day 7 and day 28, and
further late time HST data taken approximately 100 days after burst imply that
it is very red.We compare both the flux and color of the excess with supernova
models and show that the data are best explained by the presence of a Type Ib/c
supernova at a redshift z ~ 0.5, which occured roughly coincident with the day
of GRB.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0212507 [pdf] - 53897
Observations of giant outbursts from Cygnus X-1
Submitted: 2002-12-20, last modified: 2003-07-10
We present interplanetary network localization, spectral, and time history
information for 7 episodes of exceptionally intense gamma-ray emission from
Cygnus X-1. The outbursts occurred between 1995 and 2003, with durations up to
\~28000 seconds. The observed 15 - 300 keV peak fluxes and fluences reached
3E-7 erg /cm2 s, and 8E-4 erg / cm2 respectively. By combining the
triangulations of these outbursts we derive an ~1700 square arcminute (3 sigma)
error ellipse which contains Cygnus X-1 and no other known high energy sources.
The outbursts reported here occurred both when Cyg X-1 was in the hard state as
well as in the soft one, and at various orbital phases. The spectral data
indicate that these outbursts display the same parameters as those of the
underlying hard and soft states, suggesting that they represent another
manifestation of these states.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306091 [pdf] - 57172
The 2001 April Burst Activation of SGR 1900+14: X-ray afterglow emission
Feroci, M.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Woods, P.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Costa, E.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazets, E.;
Soffitta, P.;
Tavani, M.
Submitted: 2003-06-04
After nearly two years of quiescence, the soft gamma-ray repeater SGR 1900+14
again became burst-active on April 18 2001, when it emitted a large flare,
preceded by few weak and soft short bursts. After having detected the X and
gamma prompt emission of the flare, BeppoSAX pointed its narrow field X-ray
telescopes to the source in less than 8 hours. In this paper we present an
analysis of the data from this and from a subsequent BeppoSAX observation, as
well as from a set of RossiXTE observations. Our data show the detection of an
X-ray afterglow from the source, most likely related to the large hard X-ray
flare. In fact, the persistent flux from the source, in 2-10 keV, was initially
found at a level $\sim$5 times higher than the usual value. Assuming an
underlying persistent (constant) emission, the decay of the excess flux can be
reasonably well described by a t$^{-0.9}$ law. A temporal feature - a
$\sim$half a day long bump - is observed in the decay light curve approximately
one day after the burst onset. This feature is unprecedented in SGR afterglows.
We discuss our results in the context of previous observations of this source
and derive implications for the physics of these objects.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0208008 [pdf] - 50824
Discovery of GRB 020405 and its Late Red Bump
Price, P. A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Berger, E.;
Fox, D. W.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Frail, D. A.;
Galama, T. J.;
Harrison, F. A.;
McCarthy, P.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Sari, R.;
Yost, S. A.;
Jerjen, H.;
Flint, K.;
Phillips, A.;
Warren, B. E.;
Axelrod, T. S.;
Chevalier, R. A.;
Holtzman, J.;
Kimble, R. A.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Wheeler, J. C.;
Frontera, F.;
Costa, E.;
Piro, L.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Montanari, E.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Anfimov, D.;
Kozyrev, A.;
Litvak, M.;
Sanin, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Shinohara, C.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Ofek, E.;
Lipkin, Y.
Submitted: 2002-07-31, last modified: 2003-02-19
We present the discovery of GRB 020405 made with the Inter-Planetary Network
(IPN). With a duration of 60 s, the burst appears to be a typical long duration
event. We observed the 75-square acrminute IPN error region with the Mount
Stromlo Observatory's 50-inch robotic telescope and discovered a transient
source which subsequently decayed and was also associated with a variable radio
source. We identify this source as the afterglow of GRB 020405. Subsequent
observations by other groups found varying polarized flux and established a
redshift of 0.690 to the host galaxy. Motivated by the low redshift we
triggered observations with WFPC2 on-board the Hubble Space Telescope (HST).
Modeling the early ground-based data with a jet model, we find a clear red
excess over the decaying optical lightcurves that is present between day 10 and
day 141 (the last HST epoch). This `bump' has the spectral and temporal
features expected of an underlying supernova (SN). In particular, the red color
of the putative SN is similar to that of the SN associated with GRB 011121, at
late time. Restricting the sample of GRBs to those with z<0.7, a total of five
bursts, red bumps at late times are found in GRB 970228, GRB 011121, and GRB
020405. It is possible that the simplest idea, namely that all long duration
GRBs have underlying SNe with a modest dispersion in their properties
(especially peak luminosity), is sufficient to explain the non detections.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301577 [pdf] - 54548
An Extended Burst Tail from SGR 1900+14 with a Thermal X-ray Spectrum
Submitted: 2003-01-29, last modified: 2003-02-18
The Soft Gamma Repeater, SGR 1900+14, entered a new phase of activity in
April 2001 initiated by the intermediate flare recorded on April 18. Ten days
following this flare, we discovered an abrupt increase in the source flux
between consecutive RXTE orbits. This X-ray flux excess decayed over the next
several minutes and was subsequently linked to a high fluence burst from SGR
1900+14 recorded by other spacecraft (Ulysses and KONUS) while the SGR was
Earth-occulted for RXTE. We present here spectral and temporal analysis of both
the burst of 28 April and the long X-ray tail following it. We find strong
evidence of an exclusively thermal X-ray tail in this event and bring this
evidence to bear on other bursts and flares from SGR 1900+14 which have shown
extended X-ray excesses (e.g. 1998 August 29). We include in this comparison a
discussion of the physical origins of SGR bursts and extended X-ray tails.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301318 [pdf] - 54289
Early Hard X-ray Afterglows of Short GRBs with Konus Experiments
Submitted: 2003-01-16
For a ten of 125 short GRBs observed by Konus-Wind and the Konus-A the
existance of statistically significant flux of hard photons accompanying
initial event for a time of tens to hundred seconds after the trigger was
revealed. Temporal, spectral, and energetic characteristics of these events are
presented. The statistical analysis of the whole burst sample reveals that the
afterglow is a more common feature of short GRBs.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0209219 [pdf] - 51625
Konus catalog of short GRBs
Submitted: 2002-09-11
Observational data on the short GRBs obtained with the GGS-Wind Konus
experiment in the period from 1994 to 2002 are presented. The catalog currently
includes 130 events, detailing their appearance rate, time histories, and
energy spectra. Evidence of an early X-ray and gamma-ray afterglow for some of
the short GRBs is discussed. The catalog is available electronically at
http://www.ioffe.ru/LEA/shortGRBs/Catalog/
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0103357 [pdf] - 41574
X-Ray Light Curves of Gamma-ray Bursts Detected with the All-Sky Monitor
on RXTE
Submitted: 2001-03-21, last modified: 2002-02-15
We present X-ray light curves (1.5-12 keV) for fifteen gamma-ray bursts
(GRBs) detected by the All-Sky Monitor on the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer. We
compare these soft X-ray light curves with count rate histories obtained by the
high-energy (>12 keV) experiments BATSE, Konus-Wind, the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray
Burst Monitor, and the burst monitor on Ulysses. We discuss these light curves
within the context of a simple relativistic fireball and synchrotron shock
paradigm, and we address the possibility of having observed the transition
between a GRB and its afterglow. The light curves show diverse morphologies,
with striking differences between energy bands. In several bursts, intervals of
significant emission are evident in the ASM energy range with little or no
corresponding emission apparent in the high-energy light curves. For example,
the final peak of GRB 970815 as recorded by the ASM is only detected in the
softest BATSE energy bands. We also study the duration of bursts as a function
of energy. Simple, singly-peaked bursts seem consistent with the E^{-0.5} power
law expected from an origin in synchrotron radiation, but durations of bursts
that exhibit complex temporal structure are not consistent with this
prediction. Bursts such as GRB 970828 that show many short spikes of emission
at high energies last significantly longer at low energies than the synchrotron
cooling law would predict.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0201374 [pdf] - 47318
The Current Performance of the Third Interplanetary Network
Submitted: 2002-01-22
The 3rd Interplanetary Network (IPN) has been operating since April 2001 with
two distant spacecraft, Ulysses and Mars Odyssey, and numerous near-Earth
spacecraft, such as BeppoSAX, Wind, and HETE-II. Mars Odyssey is presently in
orbit about Mars, and the network has detected approximately 30 cosmic, SGR,
and solar bursts. We discuss the results obtained to date and use them to
predict the future performance of the network.
[59]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0112239 [pdf] - 46612
The BeppoSAX View on the 2001 Reactivation of SGR 1900+14
Feroci, M.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Costa, E.;
Zand, J. J. M. in 't;
Soffitta, P.;
Cline, T.;
Duncan, R.;
Finger, M.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Hurley, K.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Li, P.;
Mazets, E.;
Tavani, M.;
Thompson, C.;
Woods, P.
Submitted: 2001-12-11
After a couple of years of quiescence, the soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14
suddenly reactivated on 18 April 2001, with the emission of a very intense,
long and modulated flare, only second in intensity and duration to the 27
August 1998 giant flare. BeppoSAX caught the large flare with its Gamma Ray
Burst Monitor and with one of the Wide Field Cameras. The Wide Field Cameras
also detected X-ray bursting activity shortly before the giant flare. A target
of opportunity observation was started only 8 hours after the large flare with
the Narrow Field Instruments, composed of two 60-ks long pointings. These two
observations show an X-ray afterglow of the persistent SGR 1900+14 source,
decaying with time according to a power law of index -0.6.
[60]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107188 [pdf] - 43559
Afterglow upper limits for four short duration, hard spectrum gamma-ray
bursts
Hurley, K.;
Berger, E.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro;
Cline, T.;
Feroci, M.;
Frail, D. A.;
Frontera, F.;
Masetti, N.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Henden, A.;
Levine, S. E.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D.;
Morrison, G.;
Oksanen, A.;
Moilanen, M.;
Park, H. -S.;
Price, P. A.;
Prochaska, J.;
Trombka, J.;
Williams, G.
Submitted: 2001-07-10, last modified: 2001-11-01
We present interplanetary network localization, spectral, and time history
information for four short-duration, hard spectrum gamma-ray bursts, GRB000607,
001025B, 001204, and 010119. All of these events were followed up with
sensitive radio and optical observations (the first and only such bursts to be
followed up in the radio to date), but no detections were made, demonstrating
that the short bursts do not have anomalously intense afterglows. We discuss
the upper limits, and show that the lack of observable counterparts is
consistent both with the hypothesis that the afterglow behavior of the short
bursts is like that of the long duration bursts, many of which similarly have
no detectable afterglows, as well as with the hypothesis that the short bursts
have no detectable afterglows at all. Small number statistics do not allow a
clear choice between these alternatives, but given the present detection rates
of various missions, we show that progress can be expected in the near future.
[61]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0110315 [pdf] - 45372
The Unusually Long Duration Gamma-ray Burst GRB 000911
Price, P. A.;
Berger, E.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Djorgovski, S. G.;
Fox, D. W.;
Mahabal, A.;
Hurley, K.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Frail, D. A.;
Galama, T. J.;
Harrison, F. A.;
Morrison, G.;
Reichart, D. E.;
Yost, S. A.;
Sari, R.;
Axelrod, T. S.;
Cline, T.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Schmidt, B. P.;
Trombka, J.
Submitted: 2001-10-13
Of all the well localized gamma-ray bursts, GRB 000911 has the longest
duration (T_90 ~ 500 s), and ranks in the top 1% of BATSE bursts for fluence.
Here, we report the discovery of the afterglow of this unique burst. In order
to simultaneously fit our radio and optical observations, we are required to
invoke a model involving an hard electron distribution, p ~ 1.5 and a jet-break
time less than 1.5 day. A spectrum of the host galaxy taken 111 days after the
burst reveals a single emission line, interpreted as [OII] at a redshift z =
1.0585, and a continuum break which we interpret as the Balmer limit at this
redshift. Despite the long T_90, the afterglow of GRB 000911 is not unusual in
any other way when compared to the set of afterglows studied to date. We
conclude that the duration of the GRB plays little part in determining the
physics of the afterglow.
[62]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0102170 [pdf] - 40881
On the Fast Spectral Variability of GRBs
Submitted: 2001-02-09
Fast spectral variability of gamma-ray burst emission is considered for a
number of events seen by the Konus-Wind experiment. The variability manifests
itself as a strong correlation between instantaneous energy flux $F$ and peak
energy $E_p$. In the ($F,E_p$) plane, the correlation produces distinct tracks
in the form of branches and loops representing the different parts of a burst
time history. Despite the variety of features seen in different events, the
main characteristics of the spectral evolution produce a quite consistent
pattern.
[63]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0102168 [pdf] - 40879
General Properties of Recurrent Bursts from SGRs
Submitted: 2001-02-09
General properties of SGR bursts are considered using observational data
collected in the Konus catalog of SGR activity.
[64]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0007201 [pdf] - 37039
The very red afterglow of GRB 000418 - further evidence for dust
extinction in a GRB host galaxy
Klose, S.;
Stecklum, B.;
Masetti, N.;
Pian, E.;
Palazzi, E.;
Henden, A. A.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Fischer, O.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Sanchez-Fernandez, C.;
Butler, D.;
Ott, Th.;
Hippler, S.;
Kasper, M.;
Weiss, R.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Bartolini, C.;
Guarnieri, A.;
Piccioni, A.;
Benetti, S.;
Ghinassi, F.;
Magazzu, A.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Noeske, K.;
Papaderos, P.;
Vreeswijk, P. M.;
Tanvir, N.;
Oscoz, A.;
Munnoz, J. M.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro
Submitted: 2000-07-14, last modified: 2000-08-03
We report near-infrared and optical follow-up observations of the afterglow
of the Gamma-Ray Burst 000418 starting 2.5 days after the occurrence of the
burst and extending over nearly seven weeks. GRB 000418 represents the second
case for which the afterglow was initially identified by observations in the
near-infrared. During the first 10 days its R-band afterglow was well
characterized by a single power-law decay with a slope of 0.86. However, at
later times the temporal evolution of the afterglow flattens with respect to a
simple power-law decay. Attributing this to an underlying host galaxy we find
its magnitude to be R=23.9 and an intrinsic afterglow decay slope of 1.22. The
afterglow was very red with R-K=4 mag. The observations can be explained by an
adiabatic, spherical fireball solution and a heavy reddening due to dust
extinction in the host galaxy. This supports the picture that (long) bursts are
associated with events in star-forming regions.
[65]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0004402 [pdf] - 35761
Konus catalog of SGR activity to 2000
Submitted: 2000-04-28
Observational data on the bursting activity of all five known Soft Gamma
Repeaters are presented. This information was obtained with Konus gamma-ray
burst experiments on board Venera 11-14, Wind, and Kosmos-2326 spacecraft in
the period from 1978 to 2000. These data on appearance rates, time histories,
and energy spectra of repeated soft bursts obtained with similar instruments
and collected together in a comparable form should be useful for further
studies of SGRs. (available at http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/LEA/SGR/Catalog/).
[66]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0002116 [pdf] - 34459
Interplanetary Network Localization of GRB991208 and the Discovery of
its Afterglow
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D.;
Frail, D.;
Kulkarni, S.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.
Submitted: 2000-02-04, last modified: 2000-03-16
The extremely energetic (~10^-4 erg/cm^2) gamma-ray burst (GRB) of 1999
December 8 was triangulated to a ~14 sq. arcmin. error box ~1.8 d after its
arrival at Earth with the 3rd interplanetary network (IPN), consisting of the
Ulysses, Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR), and WIND spacecraft. Radio
observations with the Very Large Array ~2.7 d after the burst revealed a bright
fading counterpart whose position is consistent with that of an optical
transient source whose redshift is z=0.707. We present the time history, peak
flux, fluence, and refined 1.3 sq. arcmin. error box of this event, and discuss
its energetics. This is the first time that a counterpart has been found for a
GRB localized only by the IPN.
[67]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9909054 [pdf] - 108090
Observations of a possible new soft gamma repeater, SGR1801-23
Submitted: 1999-09-02
We report on two observations of a soft bursting source in 1997 June, whose
time histories and energy spectra are consistent with those of the soft gamma
repeaters. The source can only be localized to an ~3.8 degree long error box in
the direction of the Galactic center, whose area is ~ 80 sq. arcmin. The
location of the source, while not consistent with that of any of the four known
soft repeaters, is consistent with those of several known and possible
supernova remnants.
[68]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9907332 [pdf] - 107557
Localizations of Thirteen Gamma-ray Bursts by the All-Sky Monitor on
RXTE
Smith, D. A.;
Levine, A. M.;
Bradt, H. V.;
Remillard, R.;
Jernigan, J. G.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Wen, L.;
Briggs, M.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederics, D.
Submitted: 1999-07-23
The All-Sky Monitor (ASM) on the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) has been
used to localize thirteen confirmed X-ray counterparts to Gamma-Ray Bursts
(GRBs) detected over three years of operation. We quantify the errors in ASM
localizations of brief transient sources by using observations of persistent
sources with well-known locations. We apply the results of this analysis to
obtain accurate error boxes with reliable confidence levels for the thirteen
GRBs. In six of these thirteen cases, multiple detections by the ASM allow the
positions to be localized to a diamond of order ~15' x 3'. In five further
cases, the Interplanetary Network (IPN) constrains the usually ~3 deg. x 3'
(full-width) ASM error box to an area of a few tens of square arcminutes. This
work adds eleven burst localizations to the list of ~60 well-localized GRBs.
[69]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9906020 [pdf] - 106741
Where is SGR1806-20?
Submitted: 1999-06-01, last modified: 1999-07-08
We apply a statistical method to derive very precise locations for soft gamma
repeaters using data from the interplanetary network. We demonstrate the
validity of the method by deriving a 600 arcsec^2 error ellipse for SGR1900+14
whose center agrees well with the VLA source position. We then apply it to
SGR1806-20, for which we obtain a 230 arcsec^2 error ellipse, the smallest
burst error box to date. We find that the most likely position of the source
has a small but significant displacement from that of the non-thermal core of
the radio supernova remnant G10.0-0.3, which was previously thought to be the
position of the repeater. We propose a different model to explain the changing
supernova remnant morphology and the positions of the luminous blue variable
and the bursting source.
[70]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905196 [pdf] - 106522
Activity of the Soft Gamma Repeater SGR 1900+14 in 1998 from Konus-Wind
Observations: 2. The Giant August 27 Outburst
Submitted: 1999-05-15, last modified: 1999-05-21
The results of observations of the giant 1998 August 27 outburst in SGR
1900+14 are presented. A comparison is made of the two extremely intense events
on August 27, 1998 and March 5, 1979. The striking similarity between the
outbursts strongly implies a common nature. The observation of two giant
outbursts within 20 years from different sources suggests that such events
occur in an SGR once every 50-100 years.
[71]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9905195 [pdf] - 1943624
The Activity of the Soft Gamma Repeater SGR~1900+14 in 1998 from
Konus-Wind Observations: 1. Short Recurrent Bursts
Submitted: 1999-05-15, last modified: 1999-05-21
Results are presented of the observations of the soft gamma repeater SGR
1900+14 made on the Wind spacecraft during the source reactivation period from
May 1998 to January 1999. Individual characteristics of recurrent bursts, such
as their time histories, energy spectra, and maximum and integrated energy
fluxes, are considered. Some statistical distributions and relationships are
also presented. The close similarity of these events to the recurrent bursts
observed from other SGRs argues for a common emission mechanism.
[72]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9903268 [pdf] - 105672
Precise Interplanetary Network Localization of a New Soft Gamma
Repeater, SGR1627-41
Submitted: 1999-03-17
We present Ulysses, KONUS-WIND, and BATSE observations of bursts from a new
soft gamma repeater which was active in 1998 June and July. Triangulation of
the bursts results in a ~ 1.8 degree by 16 '' error box whose area is ~ 7.6
arcminutes^2, which contains the Galactic supernova remnant G337.0-0.1. This
error box intersects the position of a BeppoSAX X-ray source which is also
consistent with the position of G337.0-0.1 (Woods et al. 1999), and is thought
to be the quiescent counterpart to the repeater. If so, the resulting error box
is ~ 2 ' by 16 '' and has an area of ~ 0.6 arcminutes^2. The error box location
within the supernova remnant suggests that the neutron star has a transverse
velocity of ~ 200 - 2000 km/s.
[73]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9902292 [pdf] - 1943620
Unusual Burst Emission from the New Soft Gamma Repeater SGR1627-41
Submitted: 1999-02-19
In June-July,1998 the Konus-Wind burst spectrometer observed a series of
bursts from the new soft gamma repeater SGR1627-41. Time histories and energy
spectra of the bursts have been studied, revealing fluences and peak fluxes in
the ranges of 3x10^{-7} - 7.5x10^{-6} erg cm^{-2} and 10^{-5} - 10^{-4}erg
cm^{-2}/s respectively. One event, 18 June 6153.5sUT stands out dramatically
from this series. Its fluence is ~7x10^{-4} erg cm^{-2} and peak flux
~2x10^{-2} erg cm^{-2}/s. These values from a source at a distance of 5.8 kpc
yield an energy output of ~3x10^{42}erg and maximum luminosity of ~8x10^{43}
erg/s, similar to the values for the famous March 5, 1979 and August27,1998
events. In terms of energy, this event is another giant outburst seen in a
third SGR! However, this very energetic burst differs significantly from the
other giant outbursts. It exhibits no separate initial pulse with a fast rise
time, no extended tail, and no pulsations. It is rather similar to ordinary
repeated bursts but is a few hundred times stronger in intensity. According to
the magnetar model by Thompson and Duncan (1995) such a burst may be initiated
by a strong starquake when a crust fracture propagates over the whole surface
of a neutron star.
[74]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811443 [pdf] - 104069
A giant, periodic flare from the soft gamma repeater SGR1900+14
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Butterworth, P.;
Marshall, F.;
Palmer, D.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Il'Inskii, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
McTiernan, J.;
Gold, R.;
Trombka, J.
Submitted: 1998-11-27
Soft gamma repeaters are high-energy transient sources associated with
neutron stars in young supernova remnants. They emit sporadic, short (~ 0.1 s)
bursts with soft energy spectra during periods of intense activity. The event
of March 5, 1979 was the most intense and the only clearly periodic one to
date. Here we report on an even more intense burst on August 27, 1998, from a
different soft gamma repeater, which displayed a hard energy spectrum at its
peak, and was followed by a ~300 s long tail with a soft energy spectrum and a
dramatic 5.16 s period. Its peak and time integrated energy fluxes at Earth are
the largest yet observed from any cosmic source. This event was probably
initiated by a massive disruption of the neutron star crust, followed by an
outflow of energetic particles rotating with the period of the star. Comparison
of these two bursts supports the idea that magnetic energy plays an important
role, and that such giant flares, while rare, are not unique, and may occur at
any time in the neutron star's activity cycle.
[75]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9811411 [pdf] - 104037
Reactivation and Precise IPN Localization of the Soft Gamma Repeater
SGR1900+14
Submitted: 1998-11-25
In 1998 May, the soft gamma repeater SGR1900+14 emerged from several years of
quiescence and emitted a series of intense bursts, one with a time history
unlike any previously observed from this source. Triangulation using Ulysses,
BATSE, and KONUS data give a 1.6 square arcminute error box near the galactic
supernova remnant G42.8+0.6. This error box contains a quiescent soft X-ray
source which is probably a neutron star associated with the soft repeater.
[76]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9705128 [pdf] - 1943591
3rd Interplanetary Network Localization, Time History, Fluence, Peak
Flux, and Distance Lower Limit of the February 28, 1997 Gamma-Ray Burst
Hurley, K.;
Costa, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Cline, T.;
Fiume, D. Dal;
Orlandini, M.;
Boer, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Terekhov, M.
Submitted: 1997-05-16
The gamma-ray burst of 1997 February 28 was localized using the arrival-time
analysis method with the Ulysses, BeppoSAX, and WIND spacecraft. The result is
a plus-or-minus 31.5 arcsec (3 sigma) wide annulus of possible arrival
directions which intersects both the position of the burst determined
independently by the SAX Wide Field Camera, and the position of a fading X-ray
source detected by the SAX focussing X-ray telescopes, and reduces these source
location areas by factors of 7 and 1.5 respectively. The combination of the
annulus and the SAX locations, a 0.76 square arcminute error box, is consistent
with that of an optical transient source and an extended object, possibly a
galaxy. We also present the time history, peak flux, and fluence of this event,
and derive a model-independent lower limit to the source distance of ~11000 AU.
