Normalized to: Goldsten, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1907.07005 [pdf] - 1919460
Ex Luna, Scientia: The Lunar Occultation eXplorer (LOX)
Miller, R. S.;
Ajello, M.;
Beacom, J. F.;
Bloser, P. F.;
Burrows, A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
Goldsten, J. O.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Hoeflich, P.;
Hungerford, A.;
Lawrence, D. J.;
Leising, M. D.;
Milne, P.;
Peplowski, P. N.;
Shiraz, F.;
Sukhbold, T.;
The, L. -S.;
Yokley, Z.;
Young, C. A.
Submitted: 2019-07-16
LOX is a lunar-orbiting astrophysics mission that will probe the cosmos at
MeV energies. It is guided by open questions regarding thermonuclear, or
Type-Ia, supernovae (SNeIa) and will characterize these inherently radioactive
objects by enabling a systematic survey of SNeIa at gamma-ray energies for the
first time. Astronomical investigations from lunar orbit afford new
opportunities to advance our understanding of the cosmos. The foundation of LOX
is an observational approach well suited to the all-sky monitoring demands of
supernova investigations and time-domain astronomy. Its inherently wide
field-of-view and continuous all-sky monitoring provides an innovative way of
addressing decadal survey questions at MeV energies (0.1-10 MeV). The LOX
approach achieves high sensitivity with a simple, high-heritage instrument
design that eliminates the need for complex, position-sensitive detectors,
kinematic event reconstruction, masks, or other insensitive detector mass,
while also mitigating technology development, implementation complexity, and
their associated costs. LOX can be realized within existing programs, like
Explorer.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.02993 [pdf] - 1403858
The first observation of an intermediate flare from SGR 1935+2154
Kozlova, A. V.;
Israel, G. L.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Tsvetkova, A. E.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Zhang, X. -L.
Submitted: 2016-05-10
We report on the bright burst detected by four Interplanetary network (IPN)
spacecraft on 2015 April 12. The IPN localization of the source is consistent
with the position of the recently discovered soft gamma-repeater SGR 1935+2154.
From the Konus-Wind (KW) observation, we derive temporal and spectral
parameters of the emission, and the burst energetics. The rather long duration
of the burst ($\sim$1.7 s) and the large measured energy fluence
($\sim2.5\times10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$) put it in the class of rare
"intermediate" SGR flares, and this is the first one observed from SGR
1935+2154. A search for quasi-periodic oscillations in the KW light curve
yields no statistically significant signal. Of four spectral models tested,
optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung and a single blackbody (BB) function can
be rejected on statistical grounds; two more complex models, a cutoff power law
(CPL) and a sum of two BB functions (2BB), fit the burst spectra well and
neither of them may be ruled out by the KW observation. The CPL and 2BB model
parameters we report for this bright flare are typical of SGRs; they are also
consistent with those obtained from observations of much weaker and shorter SGR
1935+2154 bursts with other instruments. From the distribution of double
blackbody spectral fit parameters we estimate the SGR 1935+2154 distance to be
$<$10.0 kpc, in agreement with that of the Galactic supernova remnant G57.2+0.8
at 9.1 kpc.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.01264 [pdf] - 1447654
Investigation of Primordial Black Hole Bursts using Interplanetary
Network Gamma-ray Bursts
Ukwatta, T. N.;
Hurley, K.;
MacGibbon, J. H;
Svinkin, D. S;
Aptekar, R. L;
Golenetskii, S. V;
Frederiks, D. D;
Pal'shin, V. D;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Kozyrev, A. S;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Ohmori, N.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A;
McTiernan, J.
Submitted: 2015-12-03, last modified: 2016-04-27
The detection of a gamma-ray burst (GRB) in the solar neighborhood would have
very important implications for GRB phenomenology. The leading theories for
cosmological GRBs would not be able to explain such events. The final bursts of
evaporating Primordial Black Holes (PBHs), however, would be a natural
explanation for local GRBs. We present a novel technique that can constrain the
distance to gamma-ray bursts using detections from widely separated,
non-imaging spacecraft. This method can determine the actual distance to the
burst if it is local. We applied this method to constrain distances to a sample
of 36 short duration GRBs detected by the Interplanetary Network (IPN) that
show observational properties that are expected from PBH evaporations. These
bursts have minimum possible distances in the 10^13-10^18 cm (7-10^5 AU) range,
consistent with the expected PBH energetics and with a possible origin in the
solar neighborhood, although none of the bursts can be unambiguously
demonstrated to be local. Assuming these bursts are real PBH events, we
estimate lower limits on the PBH burst evaporation rate in the solar
neighborhood.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1402.6336 [pdf] - 1154767
A Missing-Link in the Supernova-GRB Connection: The Case of SN 2012ap
Chakraborti, Sayan;
Soderberg, Alicia;
Chomiuk, Laura;
Kamble, Atish;
Yadav, Naveen;
Ray, Alak;
Hurley, Kevin;
Margutti, Raffaella;
Milisavljevic, Dan;
Bietenholz, Michael;
Brunthaler, Andreas;
Pignata, Giuliano;
Pian, Elena;
Mazzali, Paolo;
Fransson, Claes;
Bartel, Norbert;
Hamuy, Mario;
Levesque, Emily;
MacFadyen, Andrew;
Dittmann, Jason;
Krauss, Miriam;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Takahashi, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Svinkin, D.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Enos, H.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Savchenko, V.
Submitted: 2014-02-25, last modified: 2015-04-22
Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are characterized by ultra-relativistic outflows,
while supernovae are generally characterized by non-relativistic ejecta. GRB
afterglows decelerate rapidly usually within days, because their low-mass
ejecta rapidly sweep up a comparatively larger mass of circumstellar material.
However supernovae, with heavy ejecta, can be in nearly free expansion for
centuries. Supernovae were thought to have non-relativistic outflows except for
few relativistic ones accompanied by GRBs. This clear division was blurred by
SN 2009bb, the first supernova with a relativistic outflow without an observed
GRB. Yet the ejecta from SN 2009bb was baryon loaded, and in nearly-free
expansion for a year, unlike GRBs. We report the first supernova discovered
without a GRB, but with rapidly decelerating mildly relativistic ejecta, SN
2012ap. We discovered a bright and rapidly evolving radio counterpart driven by
the circumstellar interaction of the relativistic ejecta. However, we did not
find any coincident GRB with an isotropic fluence of more than a sixth of the
fluence from GRB 980425. This shows for the first time that central engines in
type Ic supernovae, even without an observed GRB, can produce both relativistic
and rapidly decelerating outflows like GRBs.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.5237 [pdf] - 1209648
Optical Follow-Up Observations of PTF10qts, a Luminous Broad-Lined Type
Ic Supernova Found by the Palomar Transient Factory
Walker, E. S.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Pian, E.;
Hurley, K.;
Arcavi, I.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Horesh, A.;
Kasliwal, M.;
Poznanski, D.;
Silverman, J. M.;
Sullivan, M.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Filippenko, A. V.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Nugent, P. E.;
Ofek, E.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Ohno, M.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Zhang, X. L-.
Submitted: 2014-05-20
We present optical photometry and spectroscopy of the broad-lined Type Ic
supernova (SNIc-BL) PTF10qts, which was discovered as part of the Palomar
Transient Factory. The supernova was located in a dwarf galaxy of magnitude
$r=21.1$ at a redshift $z=0.0907$. We find that the $R$-band light curve is a
poor proxy for bolometric data and use photometric and spectroscopic data to
construct and constrain the bolometric light curve. The derived bolometric
magnitude at maximum light is $M_{\rm bol} = -18.51\pm0.2$ mag, comparable to
that of SN 1998bw ($M_{\rm bol} = -18.7$ mag) which was associated with a
gamma-ray burst (GRB). PTF10qts is one of the most luminous SNIc-BL observed
without an accompanying GRB. We estimate the physical parameters of the
explosion using data from our programme of follow-up observations, finding that
it produced a larger mass of radioactive nickel compared to other SNeIc-BL with
similar inferred ejecta masses and kinetic energies. The progenitor of the
event was likely a $\sim20$M$_{\odot}$ star.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3740 [pdf] - 702249
IPN localizations of Konus short gamma-ray bursts
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Hurley, K.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Oleynik, P. P.;
Ulanov, M. V.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Barthelmy, S. D.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Kippen, R. M.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Connaughton, V.;
Boer, M.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Amati, L.;
Nicastro, L.;
Orlandini, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Del Monte, E.;
Costa, E.;
Donnarumma, I.;
Evangelista, Y.;
Lapshov, I.;
Lazzarotto, F.;
Pacciani, L.;
Rapisarda, M.;
Soffitta, P.;
Di Cocco, G.;
Fuschino, F.;
Galli, M.;
Labanti, C.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.
Submitted: 2013-01-16, last modified: 2013-08-05
Between the launch of the \textit{GGS Wind} spacecraft in 1994 November and
the end of 2010, the Konus-\textit{Wind} experiment detected 296 short-duration
gamma-ray bursts (including 23 bursts which can be classified as short bursts
with extended emission). During this period, the IPN consisted of up to eleven
spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations of 271 bursts were
obtained. We present the most comprehensive IPN localization data on these
events. The short burst detection rate, $\sim$18 per year, exceeds that of many
individual experiments.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.3522 [pdf] - 1159075
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog of Cosmic
Gamma-Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Golenetskii, S. V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Mazets, E. P.;
Svinkin, D. S.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Ohno, M.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Gehrels, N.;
Cummings, J.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Smith, D. M.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-15, last modified: 2013-06-21
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) data for the gamma-ray bursts in the
first Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) catalog. Of the 491 bursts in that
catalog, covering 2008 July 12 to 2010 July 11, 427 were observed by at least
one other instrument in the 9-spacecraft IPN. Of the 427, the localizations of
149 could be improved by arrival time analysis (or triangulation). For any
given burst observed by the GBM and one other distant spacecraft, triangulation
gives an annulus of possible arrival directions whose half-width varies between
about 0.4' and 32 degrees, depending on the intensity, time history, and
arrival direction of the burst, as well as the distance between the spacecraft.
We find that the IPN localizations intersect the 1 sigma GBM error circles in
only 52% of the cases, if no systematic uncertainty is assumed for the latter.
If a 6 degree systematic uncertainty is assumed and added in quadrature, the
two localization samples agree about 87% of the time, as would be expected. If
we then multiply the resulting error radii by a factor of 3, the two samples
agree in slightly over 98% of the cases, providing a good estimate of the GBM 3
sigma error radius. The IPN 3 sigma error boxes have areas between about 1
square arcminute and 110 square degrees, and are, on the average, a factor of
180 smaller than the corresponding GBM localizations. We identify two bursts in
the IPN/GBM sample that did not appear in the GBM catalog. In one case, the GBM
triggered on a terrestrial gamma flash, and in the other, its origin was given
as uncertain. We also discuss the sensitivity and calibration of the IPN.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.5203 [pdf] - 617260
GRB 080407: an ultra-long burst discovered by the IPN
Pal'shin, V.;
Hurley, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Boynton, W.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Cummings, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Aptekar, R.;
Frederiks, D.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Mazets, E.;
Svinkin, D.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Rau, A.;
Savchenko, V.;
Zhang, X.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Palmer, D.;
Del Monte, E.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2013-01-22
We present observations of the extremely long GRB 080704 obtained with the
instruments of the Interplanetary Network (IPN). The observations reveal two
distinct emission episodes, separated by a ~1500 s long period of quiescence.
The total burst duration is about 2100 s. We compare the temporal and spectral
characteristics of this burst with those obtained for other ultra-long GRBs and
discuss these characteristics in the context of different models.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.0741 [pdf] - 1116376
Inverse Compton X-ray Emission from Supernovae with Compact Progenitors:
Application to SN2011fe
Margutti, R.;
Soderberg, A. M.;
Chomiuk, L.;
Chevalier, R.;
Hurley, K.;
Milisavljevic, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Hughes, J. P.;
Slane, P.;
Fransson, C.;
Moe, M.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Boynton, W.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Costa, E.;
Cummings, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Enos, H.;
Fellows, C.;
Feroci, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golovin, D.;
Hanabata, Y.;
Harshman, K.;
Krimm, H.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Makishima, K.;
Marisaldi, M.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Murakami, T.;
Ohno, M.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Starr, R.;
Svinkin, D.
Submitted: 2012-02-03
We present a generalized analytic formalism for the inverse Compton X-ray
emission from hydrogen-poor supernovae and apply this framework to SN2011fe
using Swift-XRT, UVOT and Chandra observations. We characterize the optical
properties of SN2011fe in the Swift bands and find them to be broadly
consistent with a "normal" SN Ia, however, no X-ray source is detected by
either XRT or Chandra. We constrain the progenitor system mass loss rate to be
lower than 2x10^-9 M_sun/yr (3sigma c.l.) for wind velocity v_w=100 km/s. Our
result rules out symbiotic binary progenitors for SN2011fe and argues against
Roche-lobe overflowing subgiants and main sequence secondary stars if >1% of
the transferred mass is lost at the Lagrangian points. Regardless of the
density profile, the X-ray non-detections are suggestive of a clean environment
(particle density < 150 cm-3) for (2x10^15<R<5x10^16) cm around the progenitor
site. This is either consistent with the bulk of material being confined within
the binary system or with a significant delay between mass loss and supernova
explosion. We furthermore combine X-ray and radio limits from Chomiuk et al.
2012 to constrain the post shock energy density in magnetic fields. Finally, we
searched for the shock breakout pulse using gamma-ray observations from the
Interplanetary Network and find no compelling evidence for a
supernova-associated burst. Based on the compact radius of the progenitor star
we estimate that the shock break out pulse was likely not detectable by current
satellites.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1110.6470 [pdf] - 431879
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the Fermi GBM Catalog - An AO-2
and AO-3 Guest Investigator Project
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Rau, A.;
Zhang, X.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cline, T.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Hajdas, W.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Palmer, D. M.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2011-10-28
In the first two years of operation of the Fermi GBM, the 9-spacecraft
Interplanetary Network (IPN) detected 158 GBM bursts with one or two distant
spacecraft, and triangulated them to annuli or error boxes. Combining the IPN
and GBM localizations leads to error boxes which are up to 4 orders of
magnitude smaller than those of the GBM alone. These localizations comprise the
IPN supplement to the GBM catalog, and they support a wide range of scientific
investigations.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1107.4074 [pdf] - 466155
Solar Influence on Nuclear Decay Rates: Constraints from the MESSENGER
Mission
Submitted: 2011-07-20, last modified: 2011-09-01
We have analyzed Cs-137 decay data, obtained from a small sample onboard the
MESSENGER spacecraft en route to Mercury, with the aim of setting limits on a
possible correlation between nuclear decay rates and solar activity. Such a
correlation has been suggested recently on the basis of data from Mn-54 decay
during the solar flare of 13 December 2006, and by indications of an annual and
other periodic variations in the decay rates of Si-32, Cl-36, and Ra-226. Data
from five measurements of the Cs-137 count rate over a period of approximately
5.4 years have been fit to a formula which accounts for the usual exponential
decrease in count rate over time, along with the addition of a theoretical
solar contribution varying with MESSENGER-Sun separation. The indication of
solar influence is then characterized by a non-zero value of the calculated
parameter \xi, and we find \xi=(2.8+/-8.1)x10^{-3} for Cs-137. A simulation of
the increased data that can hypothetically be expected following Mercury orbit
insertion on 18 March 2011 suggests that the anticipated improvement in the
determination of \xi could reveal a non-zero value of \xi if present at a level
consistent with other data.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.4208 [pdf] - 1051604
PTF 10bzf (SN 2010ah): a broad-line Ic supernova discovered by the
Palomar Transient Factory
Corsi, A.;
Ofek, E. O.;
Frail, D. A.;
Poznanski, D.;
Arcavi, I.;
Gal-Yam, A.;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazzali, P. A.;
Howell, D. A.;
Kasliwal, M. M.;
Green, Y.;
Murray, D.;
Sullivan, M.;
Xu, D.;
Ben-ami, S.;
Bloom, J. S.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Law, N. M.;
Nugent, P.;
Quimby, R. M.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Cummings, J.;
Connaughton, V.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Rau, A.;
Boynton, W.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Goldsten, J.
Submitted: 2011-01-21, last modified: 2011-08-31
We present the discovery and follow-up observations of a broad-line type-Ic
supernova (SN), PTF 10bzf (SN 2010ah), detected by the Palomar Transient
Factory (PTF) on 2010 February 23. The SN distance is \cong 218 Mpc, greater
than GRB 980425 / SN 1998bw and GRB 060218 / SN 2006aj, but smaller than the
other SNe firmly associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We conducted a
multi-wavelength follow-up campaign with Palomar-48 inch, Palomar 60-inch,
Gemini-N, Keck, Wise, Swift, the Allen Telescope Array, CARMA, WSRT, and EVLA.
Here we compare the properties of PTF 10bzf with those of SN 1998bw and other
broad-line SNe. The optical luminosity and spectral properties of PTF 10bzf
suggest that this SN is intermediate, in kinetic energy and amount of 56Ni,
between non GRB-associated SNe like 2002ap or 1997ef, and GRB-associated SNe
like 1998bw. No X-ray or radio counterpart to PTF 10bzf was detected. X-ray
upper-limits allow us to exclude the presence of an underlying X-ray afterglow
as luminous as that of other SN-associated GRBs like GRB 030329 or GRB 031203.
Early-time radio upper-limits do not show evidence for mildly-relativistic
ejecta. Late-time radio upper-limits rule out the presence of an underlying
off-axis GRB, with energy and wind density similar to the SN-associated GRB
030329 and GRB 031203. Finally, by performing a search for a GRB in the time
window and at the position of PTF 10bzf, we find that no GRB in the IPN catalog
could be associated with this SN.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1011.4079 [pdf] - 1941794
Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts from Six Magnetars
Abadie, J.;
Abbott, B. P.;
Abbott, R.;
Abernathy, M.;
Accadia, T.;
Acerneseac, F.;
Adams, C.;
Adhikari, R.;
Affeldt, C.;
Allen, B.;
Allen, G. S.;
Ceron, E. Amador;
Amariutei, D.;
Amin, R. S.;
Anderson, S. B.;
Anderson, W. G.;
Antonuccia, F.;
Arai, K.;
Arain, M. A.;
Araya, M. C.;
Aston, S. M.;
Astonea, P.;
Atkinson, D.;
Aufmuth, P.;
Aulbert, C.;
Aylott, B. E.;
Babak, S.;
Baker, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Ballmer, S.;
Barker, D.;
Barnum, S.;
Baroneac, F.;
Barr, B.;
Barriga, P.;
Barsotti, L.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Barton, M. A.;
Bartos, I.;
Bassiri, R.;
Bastarrika, M.;
Bastiab, A.;
Bauchrowitz, J.;
Bauera, Th. S.;
Behnke, B.;
Bekera, M. G.;
Bell, A. S.;
Belletoile, A.;
Belopolski, I.;
Benacquista, M.;
Bertolini, A.;
Betzwieser, J.;
Beveridge, N.;
Beyersdorf, P. T.;
Bilenko, I. A.;
Billingsley, G.;
Birch, J.;
Birindellia, S.;
Biswas, R.;
Bitossia, M.;
Bizouarda, M. A.;
Black, E.;
Blackburn, J. K.;
Blackburn, L.;
Blair, D.;
Bland, B.;
Bloma, M.;
Bock, O.;
Bodiya, T. P.;
Bogan, C.;
Bondarescu, R.;
Bondub, F.;
Bonelliab, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Bork, R.;
Born, M.;
Boschia, V.;
Bose, S.;
Bosia, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Boyle, M.;
Braccinia, S.;
Bradaschiaa, C.;
Brady, P. R.;
Braginsky, V. B.;
Brau, J. E.;
Breyer, J.;
Bridges, D. O.;
Brilleta, A.;
Brinkmann, M.;
Brissona, V.;
Britzger, M.;
Brooks, A. F.;
Brown, D. A.;
Brummit, A.;
Budzyńskib, R.;
Bulikbc, T.;
Bultenab, H. J.;
Buonanno, A.;
Burguet--Castell, J.;
Burmeister, O.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Byer, R. L.;
Cadonati, L.;
Cagnolia, G.;
Cain, J.;
Calloniab, E.;
Camp, J. B.;
Campagnaab, E.;
Campsie, P.;
Cannizzo, J.;
Cannon, K.;
Canuel, B.;
Cao, J.;
Capano, C.;
Carbognani, F.;
Caride, S.;
Caudill, S.;
Cavaglià, M.;
Cavaliera, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cellaa, G.;
Cepeda, C.;
Cesarinib, E.;
Chaibia, O.;
Chalermsongsak, T.;
Chalkley, E.;
Charlton, P.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chelkowski, S.;
Chen, Y.;
Chincarini, A.;
Christensen, N.;
Chua, S. S. Y.;
Chung, C. T. Y.;
Chung, S.;
Clara, F.;
Clark, D.;
Clark, J.;
Clayton, J. H.;
Clevaa, F.;
Cocciaab, E.;
Colacinoab, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Collaab, A.;
Colombinib, M.;
Conte, R.;
Cook, D.;
Corbitt, T. R.;
Cornish, N.;
Corsia, A.;
Costa, C. A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulona, J. -P.;
Coward, D. M.;
Coyne, D. C.;
Creighton, J. D. E.;
Creighton, T. D.;
Cruise, A. M.;
Culter, R. M.;
Cumming, A.;
Cunningham, L.;
Cuoco, E.;
Dahl, K.;
Danilishin, S. L.;
Dannenberg, R.;
D'Antonioa, S.;
Danzmann, K.;
Das, K.;
Dattilo, V.;
Daudert, B.;
Daveloza, H.;
Daviera, M.;
Davies, G.;
Daw, E. J.;
Day, R.;
Dayanga, T.;
De Rosaab, R.;
DeBra, D.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Degallaix, J.;
del Preteac, M.;
Dent, T.;
Dergachev, V.;
DeRosa, R.;
DeSalvo, R.;
Dhurandhar, S.;
Di Fiorea, L.;
Di Lietoab, A.;
Di Palma, I.;
Emilioac, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilioa, A.;
Díaz, M.;
Dietz, A.;
Donovan, F.;
Dooley, K. L.;
Dorsher, S.;
Douglas, E. S. D.;
Dragocd, M.;
Drever, R. W. P.;
Driggers, J. C.;
Dumas, J. -C.;
Dwyer, S.;
Eberle, T.;
Edgar, M.;
Edwards, M.;
Effler, A.;
Ehrens, P.;
Engel, R.;
Etzel, T.;
Evans, M.;
Evans, T.;
Factourovich, M.;
Fafoneab, V.;
Fairhurst, S.;
Fan, Y.;
Farr, B. F.;
Fazi, D.;
Fehrmann, H.;
Feldbaum, D.;
Ferranteab, I.;
Fidecaroab, F.;
Finn, L. S.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Flanigan, M.;
Foley, S.;
Forsi, E.;
Fortea, L. A.;
Fotopoulos, N.;
Fourniera, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frascaab, S.;
Frasconia, F.;
Frede, M.;
Frei, M.;
Frei, Z.;
Freise, A.;
Frey, R.;
Fricke, T. T.;
Friedrich, D.;
Fritschel, P.;
Frolov, V. V.;
Fulda, P.;
Fyffe, M.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoniab, L.;
Garcia, J.;
Garofoli, J. A.;
Garufiab, F.;
Gáspár, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennaia, A.;
Ghosh, S.;
Giaime, J. A.;
Giampanis, S.;
Giardina, K. D.;
Giazottoa, A.;
Gill, C.;
Goetz, E.;
Goggin, L. M.;
González, G.;
Gorodetsky, M. L.;
Goßler, S.;
Gouaty, R.;
Graef, C.;
Granata, M.;
Grant, A.;
Gras, S.;
Gray, C.;
Greenhalgh, R. J. S.;
Gretarsson, A. M.;
Greveriea, C.;
Grosso, R.;
Grote, H.;
Grunewald, S.;
Guidiab, G. M.;
Guido, C.;
Gupta, R.;
Gustafson, E. K.;
Gustafson, R.;
Hage, B.;
Hallam, J. M.;
Hammer, D.;
Hammond, G.;
Hanks, J.;
Hanna, C.;
Hanson, J.;
Harms, J.;
Harry, G. M.;
Harry, I. W.;
Harstad, E. D.;
Hartman, M. T.;
Haughian, K.;
Hayama, K.;
Hayaub, J. -F.;
Hayler, T.;
Heefner, J.;
Heitmann, H.;
Helloa, P.;
Hendry, M. A.;
Heng, I. S.;
Heptonstall, A. W.;
Herrera, V.;
Hewitson, M.;
Hild, S.;
Hoak, D.;
Hodge, K. A.;
Holt, K.;
Hong, T.;
Hooper, S.;
Hosken, D. J.;
Hough, J.;
Howell, E. J.;
Huet, D.;
Hughey, B.;
Husa, S.;
Huttner, S. H.;
Ingram, D. R.;
Inta, R.;
Isogai, T.;
Ivanov, A.;
Jaranowskid, P.;
Johnson, W. W.;
Jones, D. I.;
Jones, G.;
Jones, R.;
Ju, L.;
Kalmus, P.;
Kalogera, V.;
Kandhasamy, S.;
Kanner, J. B.;
Katsavounidis, E.;
Katzman, W.;
Kawabe, K.;
Kawamura, S.;
Kawazoe, F.;
Kells, W.;
Kelner, M.;
Keppel, D. G.;
Khalaidovski, A.;
Khalili, F. Y.;
Khazanov, E. A.;
Kim, H.;
Kim, N.;
King, P. J.;
Kinzel, D. L.;
Kissel, J. S.;
Klimenko, S.;
Kondrashov, V.;
Kopparapu, R.;
Koranda, S.;
Korth, W. Z.;
Kowalskab, I.;
Kozak, D.;
Kringel, V.;
Krishnamurthy, S.;
Krishnan, B.;
Królakae, A.;
Kuehn, G.;
Kumar, R.;
Kwee, P.;
Landry, M.;
Lantz, B.;
Lastzka, N.;
Lazzarini, A.;
Leaci, P.;
Leong, J.;
Leonor, I.;
Leroya, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, J.;
Lia, T. G. F.;
Liguoriab, N.;
Lindquist, P. E.;
Lockerbie, N. A.;
Lodhia, D.;
Lorenzinia, M.;
Lorietteb, V.;
Lormand, M.;
Losurdoa, G.;
Lu, P.;
Luan, J.;
Lubinski, M.;
Lück, H.;
Lundgren, A. P.;
Macdonald, E.;
Machenschalk, B.;
MacInnis, M.;
Mageswaran, M.;
Mailand, K.;
Majoranaa, E.;
Maksimovicb, I.;
Mana, N.;
Mandel, I.;
Mandic, V.;
Mantovaniac, M.;
Marandi, A.;
Marchesonia, F.;
Marion, F.;
Márka, S.;
Márka, Z.;
Maros, E.;
Marque, J.;
Martelliab, F.;
Martin, I. W.;
Martin, R. M.;
Marx, J. N.;
Mason, K.;
Masserot, A.;
Matichard, F.;
Matone, L.;
Matzner, R. A.;
Mavalvala, N.;
McCarthy, R.;
McClelland, D. E.;
McGuire, S. C.;
McIntyre, G.;
McKechan, D. J. A.;
Meadors, G.;
Mehmet, M.;
Meier, T.;
Melatos, A.;
Melissinos, A. C.;
Mendell, G.;
Mercer, R. A.;
Merill, L.;
Meshkov, S.;
Messenger, C.;
Meyer, M. S.;
Miao, H.;
Michel, C.;
Milanoab, L.;
Miller, J.;
Minenkova, Y.;
Mino, Y.;
Mitrofanov, V. P.;
Mitselmakher, G.;
Mittleman, R.;
Miyakawa, O.;
Moe, B.;
Moesta, P.;
Mohan, M.;
Mohanty, S. D.;
Mohapatra, S. R. P.;
Moraru, D.;
Moreno, G.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgiaab, A.;
Moscaab, S.;
Moscatellia, V.;
Mossavi, K.;
Mours, B.;
Mow--Lowry, C. M.;
Mueller, G.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Mullavey, A.;
Müller-Ebhardt, H.;
Munch, J.;
Murray, P. G.;
Nash, T.;
Nawrodt, R.;
Nelson, J.;
Neriab, I.;
Newton, G.;
Nishida, E.;
Nishizawa, A.;
Nocera, F.;
Nolting, D.;
Ochsner, E.;
O'Dell, J.;
Ogin, G. H.;
Oldenburg, R. G.;
O'Reilly, B.;
O'Shaughnessy, R.;
Osthelder, C.;
Ott, C. D.;
Ottaway, D. J.;
Ottens, R. S.;
Overmier, H.;
Owen, B. J.;
Page, A.;
Pagliaroliac, G.;
Palladinoac, L.;
Palombaa, C.;
Pan, Y.;
Pankow, C.;
Paolettia, F.;
Papa, M. A.;
Parameswaran, A.;
Pardiab, S.;
Parisiab, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquietiab, R.;
Passuelloa, D.;
Patel, P.;
Pathak, D.;
Pedraza, M.;
Pekowsky, L.;
Penn, S.;
Peralta, C.;
Perreca, A.;
Persichettiab, G.;
Phelps, M.;
Pichota, M.;
Pickenpack, M.;
Piergiovanniab, F.;
Pietkad, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Pinto, I. M.;
Pitkin, M.;
Pletsch, H. J.;
Plissi, M. V.;
Podkaminer, J.;
Poggianiab, R.;
Pöld, J.;
Postiglione, F.;
Prato, M.;
Predoi, V.;
Price, L. R.;
Prijatelj, M.;
Principe, M.;
Privitera, S.;
Prix, R.;
Prodiab, G. A.;
Prokhorov, L.;
Puncken, O.;
Punturoa, M.;
Puppoa, P.;
Quetschke, V.;
Raab, F. J.;
Rabelingab, D. S.;
Rácz, I.;
Radkins, H.;
Raffai, P.;
Rakhmanov, M.;
Ramet, C. R.;
Rankins, B.;
Rapagnaniab, P.;
Raymond, V.;
Reab, V.;
Redwine, K.;
Reed, C. M.;
Reed, T.;
Regimbaua, T.;
Reid, S.;
Reitze, D. H.;
Ricciab, F.;
Riesen, R.;
Riles, K.;
Roberts, P.;
Robertson, N. A.;
Robineta, F.;
Robinson, C.;
Robinson, E. L.;
Rocchia, A.;
Roddy, S.;
Rolland, L.;
Rollins, J.;
Romano, J. D.;
Romanoac, R.;
Romie, J. H.;
Rosińskacf, D.;
Röver, C.;
Rowan, S.;
Rüdiger, A.;
Ruggi, P.;
Ryan, K.;
Sakata, S.;
Sakosky, M.;
Salemi, F.;
Salit, M.;
Sammut, L.;
de la Jordana, L. Sancho;
Sandberg, V.;
Sannibale, V.;
Santamaría, L.;
Santiago-Prieto, I.;
Santostasi, G.;
Saraf, S.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sathyaprakash, B. S.;
Sato, S.;
Satterthwaite, M.;
Saulson, P. R.;
Savage, R.;
Schilling, R.;
Schlamminger, S.;
Schnabel, R.;
Schofield, R. M. S.;
Schulz, B.;
Schutz, B. F.;
Schwinberg, P.;
Scott, J.;
Scott, S. M.;
Searle, A. C.;
Seifert, F.;
Sellers, D.;
Sengupta, A. S.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sergeev, A.;
Shaddock, D. A.;
Shaltev, M.;
Shapiro, B.;
Shawhan, P.;
Weerathunga, T. Shihan;
Shoemaker, D. H.;
Sibley, A.;
Siemens, X.;
Sigg, D.;
Singer, A.;
Singer, L.;
Sintes, A. M.;
Skelton, G.;
Slagmolen, B. J. J.;
Slutsky, J.;
Smith, J. R.;
Smith, M. R.;
Smith, N. D.;
Smith, R.;
Somiya, K.;
Sorazu, B.;
Soto, J.;
Speirits, F. C.;
Sperandioab, L.;
Stefszky, M.;
Stein, A. J.;
Steinlechner, J.;
Steinlechner, S.;
Steplewski, S.;
Stochino, A.;
Stone, R.;
Strain, K. A.;
Strigin, S.;
Stroeer, A. S.;
Sturaniab, R.;
Stuver, A. L.;
Summerscales, T. Z.;
Sung, M.;
Susmithan, S.;
Sutton, P. J.;
Swinkels, B.;
Szokoly, G. P.;
Tacca, M.;
Talukder, D.;
Tanner, D. B.;
Tarabrin, S. P.;
Taylor, J. R.;
Taylor, R.;
Thomas, P.;
Thorne, K. A.;
Thorne, K. S.;
Thrane, E.;
Thüring, A.;
Titsler, C.;
Tokmakov, K. V.;
Toncelliab, A.;
Tonelliab, M.;
Torreac, O.;
Torres, C.;
Torrie, C. I.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travassoab, F.;
Traylor, G.;
Trias, M.;
Tseng, K.;
Turner, L.;
Ugolini, D.;
Urbanek, K.;
Vahlbruch, H.;
Vaishnav, B.;
Vajenteab, G.;
Vallisneri, M.;
Brandab, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Puttena, S.;
van der Sluys, M. V.;
van Veggel, A. A.;
Vass, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vaulin, R.;
Vavoulidisa, M.;
Vecchio, A.;
Vedovatoc, G.;
Veitch, J.;
Veitch, P. J.;
Veltkamp, C.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetranoab, F.;
Viceréab, A.;
Villar, A. E.;
Vineta, J. -Y.;
Voccaa, H.;
Vorvick, C.;
Vyachanin, S. P.;
Waldman, S. J.;
Wallace, L.;
Wanner, A.;
Ward, R. L.;
Wasa, M.;
Wei, P.;
Weinert, M.;
Weinstein, A. J.;
Weiss, R.;
Wen, L.;
Wen, S.;
Wessels, P.;
West, M.;
Westphal, T.;
Wette, K.;
Whelan, J. T.;
Whitcomb, S. E.;
White, D.;
Whiting, B. F.;
Wilkinson, C.;
Willems, P. A.;
Williams, H. R.;
Williams, L.;
Willke, B.;
Winkelmann, L.;
Winkler, W.;
Wipf, C. C.;
Wiseman, A. G.;
Woan, G.;
Wooley, R.;
Worden, J.;
Yablon, J.;
Yakushin, I.;
Yamamoto, H.;
Yamamoto, K.;
Yang, H.;
Yeaton-Massey, D.;
Yoshida, S.;
Yu, P.;
Yvert, M.;
Zanolin, M.;
Zhang, L.;
Zhang, Z.;
Zhao, C.;
Zotov, N.;
Zucker, M. E.;
Zweizig, J.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Boynton, W. V.;
Briggs, M. S.;
Cline, T. L.;
Connaughton, V.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Gehrels, N.;
Goldsten, J. O;
Golovin, D.;
van der Horst, A. J.;
Hurley, K. C.;
Kaneko, Y.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Krimm, H. A.;
Lin, L.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Ohno, M.;
Palshin, V. D.;
Rau, A.;
Sanin, A.;
Tashiro, M. S.;
Terada, Y.;
Yamaoka, K.
Submitted: 2010-11-17, last modified: 2011-04-15
Soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs) are thought to
be magnetars: neutron stars powered by extreme magnetic fields. These rare
objects are characterized by repeated and sometimes spectacular gamma-ray
bursts. The burst mechanism might involve crustal fractures and excitation of
non-radial modes which would emit gravitational waves (GWs). We present the
results of a search for GW bursts from six galactic magnetars that is sensitive
to neutron star f-modes, thought to be the most efficient GW emitting
oscillatory modes in compact stars. One of them, SGR 0501+4516, is likely ~1
kpc from Earth, an order of magnitude closer than magnetars targeted in
previous GW searches. A second, AXP 1E 1547.0-5408, gave a burst with an
estimated isotropic energy >10^{44} erg which is comparable to the giant
flares. We find no evidence of GWs associated with a sample of 1279
electromagnetic triggers from six magnetars occurring between November 2006 and
June 2009, in GW data from the LIGO, Virgo, and GEO600 detectors. Our lowest
model-dependent GW emission energy upper limits for band- and time-limited
white noise bursts in the detector sensitive band, and for f-mode ringdowns (at
1090 Hz), are 3.0x10^{44} d_1^2 erg and 1.4x10^{47} d_1^2 erg respectively,
where d_1 = d_{0501} / 1 kpc and d_{0501} is the distance to SGR 0501+4516.
These limits on GW emission from f-modes are an order of magnitude lower than
any previous, and approach the range of electromagnetic energies seen in SGR
giant flares for the first time.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.1650 [pdf] - 1026226
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst
Catalogs
Hurley, K.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Frontera, F.;
Montanari, E.;
Rossi, F.;
Feroci, M.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D. D.;
Pal'shin, V. D.;
Aptekar, R. L.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Atteia, J. -L.;
Barraud, C.;
Pelangeon, A.;
Boer, M.;
Vanderspek, R.;
Ricker, G.;
Mitrofanov, I. G.;
Golovin, D. V.;
Kozyrev, A. S.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Hajdas, W.
Submitted: 2010-04-09
Between 1996 July and 2002 April, one or more spacecraft of the
interplanetary network detected 787 cosmic gamma-ray bursts that were also
detected by the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor and/or Wide-Field X-Ray Camera
experiments aboard the BeppoSAX spacecraft. During this period, the network
consisted of up to six spacecraft, and using triangulation, the localizations
of 475 bursts were obtained. We present the localization data for these events.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:0912.4294 [pdf] - 32118
Integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor into the 3rd
Interplanetary Network
Hurley, K.;
Briggs, M.;
Connaughton, V.;
Meegan, C.;
Cline, T.;
Mitrofanov, I.;
Golovin, D.;
Litvak, M. L.;
Sanin, A. B.;
Boynton, W.;
Fellows, C.;
Harshman, K.;
Starr, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Aptekar, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Pal'shin, V.;
Frederiks, D.;
Smith, D. M.;
Wigger, C.;
Rau, A.;
von Kienlin, A.;
Yamaoka, K.;
Ohno, M.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Takahashi, T.;
Tashiro, M.;
Terada, Y.;
Murakami, T.;
Makishima, K.;
Barthelmy, S.;
Cummings, J.;
Gehrels, N.;
Krimm, H.;
Goldsten, J.;
Del Monte, E.;
Feroci, M.;
Marisaldi, M.
Submitted: 2009-12-21
We are integrating the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) into the
Interplanetary Network (IPN) of Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) detectors. With the GBM,
the IPN will comprise 9 experiments. This will 1) assist the Fermi team in
understanding and reducing their systematic localization uncertainties, 2)
reduce the sizes of the GBM and Large Area Telescope (LAT) error circles by 1
to 4 orders of magnitude, 3) facilitate the identification of GRB sources with
objects found by ground- and space-based observatories at other wavelengths,
from the radio to very high energy gamma-rays, 4) reduce the uncertainties in
associating some LAT detections of high energy photons with GBM bursts, and 5)
facilitate searches for non-electromagnetic GRB counterparts, particularly
neutrinos and gravitational radiation. We present examples and demonstrate the
synergy between Fermi and the IPN. This is a Fermi Cycle 2 Guest Investigator
project.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1502 [pdf] - 359849
A Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the Andromeda Galaxy, M31
Submitted: 2007-12-10
The light curve, energy spectra, energetics, and IPN localization of an
exceedingly intense short duration hard spectrum burst, GRB 070201, obtained
from Konus-Wind, INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), and MESSENGER data are presented. The
total fluence of the burst and the peak flux are $S = 2.00_{-0.26}^{+0.10}
\times 10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ and $F_{max} = 1.61_{-0.50}^{+0.29} \times
10^{-3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The IPN error box has an area of 446 square
arcminutes and covers the peripheral part of the M31 galaxy. Assuming that the
source of the burst is indeed in M31 at a distance of 0.78 Mpc, the measured
values of the fluence $S$ and maximum flux $F_{max}$ correspond to a total
energy of $Q = 1.5 \times 10^{45}$ erg, and a maximum luminosity $L = 1.2
\times 10^{47}$ erg s$^{-1}$. These data are in good agreement with the
corresponding characteristics of the previously observed giant flares from
other soft gamma repeaters. The evidence for the identification of this event
as a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M31 galaxy is presented.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0509424 [pdf] - 76006
Multi-Wavelength Studies of the Optically Dark Gamma-Ray Burst 001025A
Pedersen, K.;
Hurley, K.;
Hjorth, J.;
Smith, D. A.;
Andersen, M. I.;
Christensen, L.;
Cline, T.;
Fynbo, J. P. U.;
Goldsten, J.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Jakobsson, P.;
Jensen, B. L.;
Milvang-Jensen, B.;
McClanahan, T.;
Moller, P.;
Palshin, V.;
Schartel, N.;
Trombka, J.;
Ulanov, M.;
Watson, D.
Submitted: 2005-09-15
We identify the fading X-ray afterglow of GRB 001025A from XMM-Newton
observations obtained 1.9-2.3 days, 2 years, and 2.5 years after the burst. The
non-detection of an optical counterpart to an upper limit of R=25.5, 1.20 days
after the burst, makes GRB 001025A a ``dark'' burst. Based on the X-ray
afterglow spectral properties of GRB 001025A, we argue that some bursts appear
optically dark because their afterglow is faint and their cooling frequency is
close to the X-ray band. This interpretation is applicable to several of the
few other dark bursts where the X-ray spectral index has been measured. The
X-ray afterglow flux of GRB 001025A is an order of magnitude lower than for
typical long-duration gamma-ray bursts. The spectrum of the X-ray afterglow can
be fitted with an absorbed synchrotron emission model, an absorbed thermal
plasma model, or a combination thereof. For the latter, an extrapolation to
optical wavelengths can be reconciled with the R-band upper limit on the
afterglow, without invoking any optical circumburst absorption, provided the
cooling frequency is close to the X-ray band. Alternatively, if the X-ray
afterglow is due to synchrotron emission only, seven magnitudes of extinction
in the observed R-band is required to meet the R-band upper limit, making GRB
001025A much more obscured than bursts with detected optical afterglows. Based
on the column density of X-ray absorbing circumburst matter, an SMC gas-to-dust
ratio is insufficient to produce this amount of extinction. The X-ray tail of
the prompt emission enters a steep temporal decay excluding that the tail of
the prompt emission is the onset of the afterglow (abridged).
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0409053 [pdf] - 67134
The Interplanetary Network Supplement to the BATSE Catalogs of
Untriggered Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts
Hurley, K.;
Stern, B.;
Kommers, J.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Goldsten, J.;
Feroci, M.;
Frontera, F.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Montanari, E.;
Lewin, W.;
Meegan, C.;
Fishman, G.;
Kouveliotou, C.;
Sinha, S.;
Seetha, S.
Submitted: 2004-09-02, last modified: 2004-10-11
We present Interplanetary Network (IPN) detection and localization
information for 211 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed as untriggered events by
the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE), and published in catalogs by
Kommers et al. (2001) and Stern et al. (2001). IPN confirmations have been
obtained by analyzing the data from 11 experiments. For any given burst
observed by BATSE and one other distant spacecraft, arrival time analysis (or
``triangulation'') results in an annulus of possible arrival directions whose
half-width varies between 14 arcseconds and 5.6 degrees, depending on the
intensity, time history, and arrival direction of the burst, as well as the
distance between the spacecraft. This annulus generally intersects the BATSE
error circle, resulting in a reduction of the area of up to a factor of ~650.
When three widely separated spacecraft observed a burst, the result is an error
box whose area is as much as 30000 times smaller than that of the BATSE error
circle.
Because the IPN instruments are considerably less sensitive than BATSE, they
generally did not detect the weakest untriggered bursts, but did detect the
more intense ones which failed to trigger BATSE when the trigger was disabled.
In a few cases, we have been able to identify the probable origin of bursts as
soft gamma repeaters. The vast majority of the IPN-detected events, however,
are GRBs, and the confirmation of them validates many of the procedures
utilized to detect BATSE untriggered bursts.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0005609 [pdf] - 36380
The afterglow of the short/intermediate-duration gamma-ray burst GRB
000301C: A jet at z=2.04
Jensen, B. L.;
Fynbo, J. U.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Hjorth, J.;
Holland, S.;
Moller, P.;
Thomsen, B.;
Bjornsson, G.;
Pedersen, H.;
Burud, I.;
Henden, A.;
Tanvir, N. R.;
Davis, C. J.;
Vreeswijk, P.;
Rol, E.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Greiner, J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Kuemmel, M.;
Mundt, R.
Submitted: 2000-05-31, last modified: 2001-03-02
We present Ulysses and NEAR data from the detection of the short or
intermediate duration (2 s) gamma-ray burst GRB000301C (2000 March 1.41 UT).
The gamma-ray burst (GRB) was localised by the Inter Planetary Network (IPN)
and RXTE to an area of 50 arcmin^2. A fading optical counterpart was
subsequently discovered with the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) about 42h after
the burst. The GRB lies at the border between the long-soft and the short-hard
classes of GRBs. If GRB000301C belongs to the latter class, this would be the
first detection of an afterglow to a short-hard burst. We present UBRI and JHK
photometry from the time of the discovery until 11 days after the burst.
Finally, we present spectroscopic observations of the optical afterglow
obtained with the ESO VLT Antu telescope 4 and 5 days after the burst. The
optical light curve is consistent with being achromatic from 2 to 11 days after
the burst and exhibits a break. A broken power-law fit yields a shallow
pre-break decay power-law slope of a_1=-0.72+-0.06, a break time of
t_b=4.39+-0.26 days after the burst, and a post-break slope of a_2=-2.29+-0.17,
which is best explained by a sideways expanding jet in an ambient medium of
constant mean density. In the optical spectrum we find absorption features that
are consistent with FeII, CIV, CII, SiII and Ly-a at a redshift of
2.0404+-0.0008. We find evidence for a curved shape of the spectral energy
distribution of the observed afterglow. It is best fitted with a power-law
spectral distribution with index b ~ -0.7 reddened by an SMC-like extinction
law with A_V~0.1 mag. Based on the Ly-a absorption line we estimate the HI
column density to be log(N(HI))=21.2+-0.5. This is the first direct indication
of a connection between GRB host galaxies and Damped Ly-a Absorbers.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0101425 [pdf] - 40563
Detection of the optical afterglow of GRB 000630: Implications for dark
bursts
Fynbo, J. U.;
Jensen, B. L.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Hjorth, J.;
Pedersen, H.;
Moller, P.;
Abbott, T.;
Castro-Tirado, A. J.;
Delgado, D.;
Greiner, J.;
Henden, A.;
Magazzu, A.;
Masetti, N.;
Merlino, S.;
Masegosa, J.;
Oestensen, R.;
Palazzi, E.;
Pian, E.;
Schwarz, H. E.;
Cline, T.;
Guidorzi, C.;
Goldsten, J.;
Hurley, K.;
Mazets, E.;
McClanahan, T.;
Montanari, E.;
Starr, R.;
Trombka, J.
Submitted: 2001-01-24
We present the discovery of the optical transient of the long-duration
gamma-ray burst GRB000630. The optical transient was detected with the Nordic
Optical Telescope 21.1 hours after the burst. At the time of discovery the
magnitude of the transient was R = 23.04+-0.08. The transient displayed a
power-law decline characterized by a decay slope of alpha = -1.035+-0.097. A
deep image obtained 25 days after the burst shows no indication of a
contribution from a supernova or a host galaxy at the position of the
transient. The closest detected galaxy is a R=24.68+-0.15 galaxy 2.0 arcsec
north of the transient.
The magnitudes of the optical afterglows of GRB980329, GRB980613 and
GRB000630 were all R>=23 less than 24 hours from the burst epoch. We discuss
the implications of this for our understanding of GRBs without detected optical
transients. We conclude that i) based on the gamma-ray properties of the
current sample we cannot conclude that GRBs with no detected OTs belong to
another class of GRBs than GRBs with detected OTs and ii) the majority (>75%)
of GRBs for which searches for optical afterglow have been unsuccessful are
consistent with no detection if they were similar to bursts like GRB000630 at
optical wavelengths.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0007201 [pdf] - 37039
The very red afterglow of GRB 000418 - further evidence for dust
extinction in a GRB host galaxy
Klose, S.;
Stecklum, B.;
Masetti, N.;
Pian, E.;
Palazzi, E.;
Henden, A. A.;
Hartmann, D. H.;
Fischer, O.;
Gorosabel, J.;
Sanchez-Fernandez, C.;
Butler, D.;
Ott, Th.;
Hippler, S.;
Kasper, M.;
Weiss, R.;
Castro-Tirado, A.;
Greiner, J.;
Bartolini, C.;
Guarnieri, A.;
Piccioni, A.;
Benetti, S.;
Ghinassi, F.;
Magazzu, A.;
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.;
Gold, R.;
Mazets, E.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Noeske, K.;
Papaderos, P.;
Vreeswijk, P. M.;
Tanvir, N.;
Oscoz, A.;
Munnoz, J. M.;
Cerón, J. M. Castro
Submitted: 2000-07-14, last modified: 2000-08-03
We report near-infrared and optical follow-up observations of the afterglow
of the Gamma-Ray Burst 000418 starting 2.5 days after the occurrence of the
burst and extending over nearly seven weeks. GRB 000418 represents the second
case for which the afterglow was initially identified by observations in the
near-infrared. During the first 10 days its R-band afterglow was well
characterized by a single power-law decay with a slope of 0.86. However, at
later times the temporal evolution of the afterglow flattens with respect to a
simple power-law decay. Attributing this to an underlying host galaxy we find
its magnitude to be R=23.9 and an intrinsic afterglow decay slope of 1.22. The
afterglow was very red with R-K=4 mag. The observations can be explained by an
adiabatic, spherical fireball solution and a heavy reddening due to dust
extinction in the host galaxy. This supports the picture that (long) bursts are
associated with events in star-forming regions.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0002116 [pdf] - 34459
Interplanetary Network Localization of GRB991208 and the Discovery of
its Afterglow
Hurley, K.;
Cline, T.;
Mazets, E.;
Aptekar, R.;
Golenetskii, S.;
Frederiks, D.;
Frail, D.;
Kulkarni, S.;
Trombka, J.;
McClanahan, T.;
Starr, R.;
Goldsten, J.
Submitted: 2000-02-04, last modified: 2000-03-16
The extremely energetic (~10^-4 erg/cm^2) gamma-ray burst (GRB) of 1999
December 8 was triangulated to a ~14 sq. arcmin. error box ~1.8 d after its
arrival at Earth with the 3rd interplanetary network (IPN), consisting of the
Ulysses, Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR), and WIND spacecraft. Radio
observations with the Very Large Array ~2.7 d after the burst revealed a bright
fading counterpart whose position is consistent with that of an optical
transient source whose redshift is z=0.707. We present the time history, peak
flux, fluence, and refined 1.3 sq. arcmin. error box of this event, and discuss
its energetics. This is the first time that a counterpart has been found for a
GRB localized only by the IPN.