Normalized to: Glaze, L.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2004.01017 [pdf] - 2074548
Initial results from the New Horizons exploration of 2014 MU69, a small
Kuiper Belt Object
Stern, S. A.;
Weaver, H. A.;
Spencer, J. R.;
Olkin, C. B.;
Gladstone, G. R.;
Grundy, W. M.;
Moore, J. M.;
Cruikshank, D. P.;
Elliott, H. A.;
McKinnon, W. B.;
Parker, J. Wm.;
Verbiscer, A. J.;
Young, L. A.;
Aguilar, D. A.;
Albers, J. M.;
Andert, T.;
Andrews, J. P.;
Bagenal, F.;
Banks, M. E.;
Bauer, B. A.;
Bauman, J. A.;
Bechtold, K. E.;
Beddingfield, C. B.;
Behrooz, N.;
Beisser, K. B.;
Benecchi, S. D.;
Bernardoni, E.;
Beyer, R. A.;
Bhaskaran, S.;
Bierson, C. J.;
Binzel, R. P.;
Birath, E. M.;
Bird, M. K.;
Boone, D. R.;
Bowman, A. F.;
Bray, V. J.;
Britt, D. T.;
Brown, L. E.;
Buckley, M. R.;
Buie, M. W.;
Buratti, B. J.;
Burke, L. M.;
Bushman, S. S.;
Carcich, B.;
Chaikin, A. L.;
Chavez, C. L.;
Cheng, A. F.;
Colwell, E. J.;
Conard, S. J.;
Conner, M. P.;
Conrad, C. A.;
Cook, J. C.;
Cooper, S. B.;
Custodio, O. S.;
Ore, C. M. Dalle;
Deboy, C. C.;
Dharmavaram, P.;
Dhingra, R. D.;
Dunn, G. F.;
Earle, A. M.;
Egan, A. F.;
Eisig, J.;
El-Maarry, M. R.;
Engelbrecht, C.;
Enke, B. L.;
Ercol, C. J.;
Fattig, E. D.;
Ferrell, C. L.;
Finley, T. J.;
Firer, J.;
Fischetti, J.;
Folkner, W. M.;
Fosbury, M. N.;
Fountain, G. H.;
Freeze, J. M.;
Gabasova, L.;
Glaze, L. S.;
Green, J. L.;
Griffith, G. A.;
Guo, Y.;
Hahn, M.;
Hals, D. W.;
Hamilton, D. P.;
Hamilton, S. A.;
Hanley, J. J.;
Harch, A.;
Harmon, K. A.;
Hart, H. M.;
Hayes, J.;
Hersman, C. B.;
Hill, M. E.;
Hill, T. A.;
Hofgartner, J. D.;
Holdridge, M. E.;
Horányi, M.;
Hosadurga, A.;
Howard, A. D.;
Howett, C. J. A.;
Jaskulek, S. E.;
Jennings, D. E.;
Jensen, J. R.;
Jones, M. R.;
Kang, H. K.;
Katz, D. J.;
Kaufmann, D. E.;
Kavelaars, J. J.;
Keane, J. T.;
Keleher, G. P.;
Kinczyk, M.;
Kochte, M. C.;
Kollmann, P.;
Krimigis, S. M.;
Kruizinga, G. L.;
Kusnierkiewicz, D. Y.;
Lahr, M. S.;
Lauer, T. R.;
Lawrence, G. B.;
Lee, J. E.;
Lessac-Chenen, E. J.;
Linscott, I. R.;
Lisse, C. M.;
Lunsford, A. W.;
Mages, D. M.;
Mallder, V. A.;
Martin, N. P.;
May, B. H.;
McComas, D. J.;
McNutt, R. L.;
Mehoke, Jr. D. S.;
Mehoke, T. S.;
Nelson, D. S.;
Nguyen, H. D.;
Núñez, J. I.;
Ocampo, A. C.;
Owen, W. M.;
Oxton, G. K.;
Parker, A. H.;
Pätzold, M.;
Pelgrift, J. Y.;
Pelletier, F. J.;
Pineau, J. P.;
Piquette, M. R.;
Porter, S. B.;
Protopapa, S.;
Quirico, E.;
Redfern, J. A.;
Regiec, A. L.;
Reitsema, H. J.;
Reuter, D. C.;
Richardson, D. C.;
Riedel, J. E.;
Ritterbush, M. A.;
Robbins, S. J.;
Rodgers, D. J.;
Rogers, G. D.;
Rose, D. M.;
Rosendall, P. E.;
Runyon, K. D.;
Ryschkewitsch, M. G.;
Saina, M. M.;
Salinas, M. J.;
Schenk, P. M.;
Scherrer, J. R.;
Schlei, W. R.;
Schmitt, B.;
Schultz, D. J.;
Schurr, D. C.;
Scipioni, F.;
Sepan, R. L.;
Shelton, R. G.;
Showalter, M. R.;
Simon, M.;
Singer, K. N.;
Stahlheber, E. W.;
Stanbridge, D. R.;
Stansberry, J. A.;
Steffl, A. J.;
Strobel, D. F.;
Stothoff, M. M.;
Stryk, T.;
Stuart, J. R.;
Summers, M. E.;
Tapley, M. B.;
Taylor, A.;
Taylor, H. W.;
Tedford, R. M.;
Throop, H. B.;
Turner, L. S.;
Umurhan, O. M.;
Van Eck, J.;
Velez, D.;
Versteeg, M. H.;
Vincent, M. A.;
Webbert, R. W.;
Weidner, S. E.;
Weigle, G. E.;
Wendel, J. R.;
White, O. L.;
Whittenburg, K. E.;
Williams, B. G.;
Williams, K. E.;
Williams, S. P.;
Winters, H. L.;
Zangari, A. M.;
Zurbuchen, T. H.
Submitted: 2020-04-02
The Kuiper Belt is a distant region of the Solar System. On 1 January 2019,
the New Horizons spacecraft flew close to (486958) 2014 MU69, a Cold Classical
Kuiper Belt Object, a class of objects that have never been heated by the Sun
and are therefore well preserved since their formation. Here we describe
initial results from these encounter observations. MU69 is a bi-lobed contact
binary with a flattened shape, discrete geological units, and noticeable albedo
heterogeneity. However, there is little surface color and compositional
heterogeneity. No evidence for satellites, ring or dust structures, gas coma,
or solar wind interactions was detected. By origin MU69 appears consistent with
pebble cloud collapse followed by a low velocity merger of its two lobes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.02783 [pdf] - 1979667
Venus as a Laboratory for Exoplanetary Science
Kane, Stephen R.;
Arney, Giada;
Crisp, David;
Domagal-Goldman2, Shawn;
Glaze, Lori S.;
Goldblatt, Colin;
Grinspoon, David;
Head, James W.;
Lenardic, Adrian;
Unterborn, Cayman;
Way, Michael J.;
Zahnle, Kevin J.
Submitted: 2019-08-07, last modified: 2019-08-26
The current goals of the astrobiology community are focused on developing a
framework for the detection of biosignatures, or evidence thereof, on objects
inside and outside of our solar system. A fundamental aspect of understanding
the limits of habitable environments (surface liquid water) and detectable
signatures thereof is the study of where the boundaries of such environments
can occur. Such studies provide the basis for understanding how a once
inhabitable planet might come to be uninhabitable. The archetype of such a
planet is arguably Earth's sibling planet, Venus. Given the need to define the
conditions that can rule out biorelated signatures of exoplanets, Venus
provides a unique opportunity to explore the processes that led to a completely
uninhabitable environment by our current definition of the term. Here we review
the current state of knowledge regarding Venus, particularly in the context of
remote sensing techniques that are being or will be employed in the search for
and characterization of exoplanets. We discuss candidate Venus analogs
identified by the Kepler and TESS exoplanet missions and provide an update to
exoplanet demographics that can be placed in the potential runaway greenhouse
regime where Venus analogs are thought to reside. We list several major
outstanding questions regarding the Venus environment and the relevance of
those questions to understanding the atmospheres and interior structure of
exoplanets. Finally, we outline the path towards a deeper analysis of our
sibling planet and the synergy to exoplanetary science.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05094 [pdf] - 1666212
Exoplanet Science Priorities from the Perspective of Internal and
Surface Processes for Silicate and Ice Dominated Worlds
Henning, Wade G.;
Renaud, Joseph P.;
Mandell, Avi M.;
Saxena, Prabal;
Hurford, Terry A.;
Matsumura, Soko;
Glaze, Lori S.;
Livengood, Timothy A.;
Airapetian, Vladimir;
Asphaug, Erik;
Teske, Johanna K.;
Schwieterman, Edward;
Efroimsky, Michael;
Makarov, Valeri V.;
Berghea, Ciprian T.;
Bleacher, Jacob;
Rushby, Andrew;
Lee, Yuni;
Kuang, Weijia;
Barnes, Rory;
Dong, Chuanfei;
Driscoll, Peter;
Domagal-Goldman, Shawn D.;
Schmerr, Nicholas C.;
Del Genio, Anthony D.;
Jensen, Adam G.;
Kaltenegger, Lisa;
Elkins-Tanton, Linda;
Shock, Everett L.;
Sohl, Linda E.;
Quintana, Elisa;
Schaefer, Laura;
Barclay, Thomas S.;
Fujii, Yuka;
Hamano, Keiko;
Petro, Noah E.;
Lopez, Eric D.;
Sasselov, Dimitar D.
Submitted: 2018-04-13
The geophysics of extrasolar planets is a scientific topic often regarded as
standing largely beyond the reach of near-term observations. This reality in no
way diminishes the central role of geophysical phenomena in shaping planetary
outcomes, from formation, to thermal and chemical evolution, to numerous issues
of surface and near-surface habitability. We emphasize that for a balanced
understanding of extrasolar planets, it is important to look beyond the natural
biases of current observing tools, and actively seek unique pathways to
understand exoplanet interiors as best as possible during the long interim
prior to a time when internal components are more directly accessible. Such
pathways include but are not limited to: (a) enhanced theoretical and numerical
modeling, (b) laboratory research on critical material properties, (c)
measurement of geophysical properties by indirect inference from imprints left
on atmospheric and orbital properties, and (d) the purpose-driven use of Solar
System object exploration expressly for its value in comparative planetology
toward exoplanet-analogs. Breaking down barriers that envision local Solar
System exploration, including the study of Earth's own deep interior, as
separate from and in financial competition with extrasolar planet research, may
greatly improve the rate of needed scientific progress for exoplanet
geophysics. As the number of known rocky and icy exoplanets grows in the years
ahead, we expect demand for expertise in 'exogeoscience' will expand at a
commensurately intense pace. We highlight key topics, including: how water
oceans below ice shells may dominate the total habitability of our galaxy by
volume, how free-floating nomad planets may often attain habitable subsurface
oceans supported by radionuclide decay, and how deep interiors may critically
interact with atmospheric mass loss via dynamo-driven magnetic fields.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.05110 [pdf] - 1666213
Highly Volcanic Exoplanets, Lava Worlds, and Magma Ocean Worlds: An
Emerging Class of Dynamic Exoplanets of Significant Scientific Priority
Henning, Wade G.;
Renaud, Joseph P.;
Saxena, Prabal;
Whelley, Patrick L.;
Mandell, Avi M.;
Matsumura, Soko;
Glaze, Lori S.;
Hurford, Terry A.;
Livengood, Timothy A.;
Hamilton, Christopher W.;
Efroimsky, Michael;
Makarov, Valeri V.;
Berghea, Ciprian T.;
Guzewich, Scott D.;
Tsigaridis, Kostas;
Arney, Giada N.;
Cremons, Daniel R.;
Kane, Stephen R.;
Bleacher, Jacob E.;
Kopparapu, Ravi K.;
Kohler, Erika;
Lee, Yuni;
Rushby, Andrew;
Kuang, Weijia;
Barnes, Rory;
Richardson, Jacob A.;
Driscoll, Peter;
Schmerr, Nicholas C.;
Del Genio, Anthony D.;
Davies, Ashley Gerard;
Kaltenegger, Lisa;
Elkins-Tanton, Linda;
Fujii, Yuka;
Schaefer, Laura;
Ranjan, Sukrit;
Quintana, Elisa;
Barclay, Thomas S.;
Hamano, Keiko;
Petro, Noah E.;
Kendall, Jordan D.;
Lopez, Eric D.;
Sasselov, Dimitar D.
Submitted: 2018-04-13
Highly volcanic exoplanets, which can be variously characterized as 'lava
worlds', 'magma ocean worlds', or 'super-Ios' are high priority targets for
investigation. The term 'lava world' may refer to any planet with extensive
surface lava lakes, while the term 'magma ocean world' refers to planets with
global or hemispherical magma oceans at their surface. 'Highly volcanic
planets', including super-Ios, may simply have large, or large numbers of,
active explosive or extrusive volcanoes of any form. They are plausibly highly
diverse, with magmatic processes across a wide range of compositions,
temperatures, activity rates, volcanic eruption styles, and background
gravitational force magnitudes. Worlds in all these classes are likely to be
the most characterizable rocky exoplanets in the near future due to
observational advantages that stem from their preferential occurrence in short
orbital periods and their bright day-side flux in the infrared. Transit
techniques should enable a level of characterization of these worlds analogous
to hot Jupiters. Understanding processes on highly volcanic worlds is critical
to interpret imminent observations. The physical states of these worlds are
likely to inform not just geodynamic processes, but also planet formation, and
phenomena crucial to habitability. Volcanic and magmatic activity uniquely
allows chemical investigation of otherwise spectroscopically inaccessible
interior compositions. These worlds will be vital to assess the degree to which
planetary interior element abundances compare to their stellar hosts, and may
also offer pathways to study both the very young Earth, and the very early form
of many silicate planets where magma oceans and surface lava lakes are expected
to be more prevalent. We suggest that highly volcanic worlds may become second
only to habitable worlds in terms of both scientific and public long-term
interest.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03146 [pdf] - 1616177
Venus: The Making of an Uninhabitable World
Submitted: 2018-01-09
The goals of the astrobiology community are focussed on developing a
framework for the detection of biosignatures, or evidence thereof, on objects
inside and outside of our solar system. A fundamental aspect of understanding
the limits of habitable environments and detectable signatures is the study of
where the boundaries of such environments can occur. Thus, the need to study
the creation, evolution, and frequency of hostile environments for habitability
is an integral part of the astrobiology story. These provide the opportunity to
understand the bifurcation, between habitable and uninhabitable. The archetype
of such a planet is the Earth's sister planet, Venus, and provides a unique
opportunity to explore the processes that created a completely uninhabitable
environment and thus define the conditions that can rule out bio-related
signatures. We advocate a continued comprehensive study of our sister planet,
including models of early atmospheres, compositional abundances, and
Venus-analog frequency analysis from current and future exoplanet data.
Moreover, new missions to Venus to provide in-situ data are necessary.