Normalized to: Gionti, G.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2003.04304 [pdf] - 2070534
Canonical Analysis of Brans-Dicke Theory Addresses Hamiltonian
Inequivalence between Jordan and Einstein Frames
Submitted: 2020-03-06, last modified: 2020-03-26
Jordan and Einstein frames are studied under the light of Hamiltonian
formalism. Dirac's constraint theory for Hamiltonian systems is applied to
Brans-Dicke theory. In both Jordan and Einstein frames, Brans-Dicke theory has
four secondary first class constraints, whose constraint algebra is different.
The Weyl (conformal) transformation, between the two frames, is not a canonical
transformation, addressing quantum mechanical inequivalence as well.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1902.03014 [pdf] - 2006563
Some Aspects of the Canonical Analysis of Reuter-Weyer RG Improved
Einstein-Hilbert Action
Submitted: 2019-02-08, last modified: 2019-11-28
A canonical analysis of RG improved action of the Einstein-Hilbert functional
is performed. The gravitational and cosmological constants as function of the
space-time coordinates are treated as external non-geometrical fields. Dirac's
constraint analysis is performed, in the general case, up to secondary
constraints. The constraints are second class and, in general, the problem
appears to be technically complicated. This fact suggests studying the Dirac's
constraint analysis of the related Brans-Dicke theory. It exhibits a Dirac's
constraint algebra similar to Einstein's geometrodynamics except that the
Poisson Brackets between Hamiltonian-Hamiltonian constraints is not only linear
combination of the momentum constraints but also of a term note reducible to
linear combination of the constraint and proportional to the extrinsic
curvature. This shows that Branse-Dicke geometrodynamics is inequivalent to
Einstein General Relativity geometrodynamics.