Normalized to: Gill, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.00050 [pdf] - 2126330
A DESGW Search for the Electromagnetic Counterpart to the LIGO/Virgo
Gravitational Wave Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate S190510g
DES Collaboration;
Garcia, A.;
Morgan, R.;
Herner, K.;
Palmese, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Santana-Silva, L.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Allam, S.;
Wiesner, M.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Sako, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Scolnic, D.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Sherman, N.;
Conselice, C.;
Chen, H.;
Foley, R. J.;
Doctor, Z.;
Horvath, J.;
Howell, D. A.;
Kilpatrick, C. D.;
Casares, J.;
Cooke, J.;
Rest, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Varga, T. N.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2020-06-30
We present the results from a search for the electromagnetic counterpart of
the LIGO/Virgo event S190510g using the Dark Energy Camera (DECam). S190510g is
a binary neutron star (BNS) merger candidate of moderate significance detected
at a distance of 227$\pm$92 Mpc and localized within an area of 31 (1166)
square degrees at 50\% (90\%) confidence. While this event was later classified
as likely non-astrophysical in nature within 30 hours of the event, our short
latency search and discovery pipeline identified 11 counterpart candidates, all
of which appear consistent with supernovae following offline analysis and
spectroscopy by other instruments. Later reprocessing of the images enabled the
recovery of 6 more candidates. Additionally, we implement our candidate
selection procedure on simulated kilonovae and supernovae under DECam observing
conditions (e.g., seeing, exposure time) with the intent of quantifying our
search efficiency and making informed decisions on observing strategy for
future similar events. This is the first BNS counterpart search to employ a
comprehensive simulation-based efficiency study. We find that using the current
follow-up strategy, there would need to be 19 events similar to S190510g for us
to have a 99\% chance of detecting an optical counterpart, assuming a
GW170817-like kilonova. We further conclude that optimization of observing
plans, which should include preference for deeper images over multiple color
information, could result in up to a factor of 1.5 reduction in the total
number of followups needed for discovery.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.14961 [pdf] - 2122762
A statistical standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant from the
LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave compact object merger GW190814 and Dark Energy
Survey galaxies
Palmese, A.;
deVicente, J.;
Pereira, M. E. S.;
Annis, J.;
Hartley, W.;
Herner, K.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Crocce, M.;
Huterer, D.;
Hernandez, I. Magana;
Davis, T. M.;
Garcia, A.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gschwend, J.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kessler, R.;
Lahav, O.;
Morgan, R.;
Nicolaou, C.;
Conselice, C.;
Foley, R. J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Allam, S.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Chang, C.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Estrada, J.;
Everett, S.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, J. Allyn;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Wilkinson, R. D.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2020-06-25
We present a measurement of the Hubble constant $H_0$ using the gravitational
wave (GW) event GW190814, which resulted from the coalescence of a 23 $M_\odot$
black hole with a 2.6 $M_\odot$ compact object, as a standard siren. No
compelling electromagnetic counterpart with associated host galaxy has been
identified for this event, thus our analysis accounts for $\sim$ 2,700
potential host galaxies within a statistical framework. The redshift
information is obtained from the photometric redshift (photo-$z$) catalog from
the Dark Energy Survey. The luminosity distance is provided by the
gravitational wave sky map published by the LIGO/Virgo Collaboration. Since
this GW event has the second-smallest sky localization area after GW170817,
GW190814 is likely to provide the best constraint on cosmology from a single
standard siren without identifying an electromagnetic counterpart. Our analysis
uses photo-$z$ probability distribution functions and corrects for photo-$z$
biases. We also reanalyze the binary-black hole GW170814 within this updated
framework. We explore how our findings impact the $H_0$ constraints from
GW170817, the only GW merger associated with a unique host galaxy, and
therefore the most powerful standard siren to date. From a combination of
GW190814, GW170814 and GW170817, our analysis yields $H_0 = 69.0^{+ 14}_{- 7.5
}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ (68% Highest Density Interval, HDI) for a prior in
$H_0$ uniform between $[20,140]~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$. The addition of
GW190814 and GW170814 to GW170817 improves the 68% HDI from GW170817 alone by
$\sim 12\%$, showing how well-localized mergers without counterparts can
provide a marginal contribution to standard siren measurements, provided that a
complete galaxy catalog is available at the location of the event.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2006.07385 [pdf] - 2114306
Constraints on the Physical Properties of S190814bv through Simulations
based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey
Morgan, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Herner, K.;
Garcia, A.;
Palmese, A.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Kessler, R.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Sherman, T. G. Bachmann N.;
Allam, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bom, C. R.;
Brout, D.;
Butler, R. E.;
Butner, M.;
Cartier, R.;
Chen, H.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E.;
Davis, T. M.;
Doctor, Z.;
Farr, B.;
Figueiredo, A. L.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Galarza, J. Y.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lidman, C.;
Lin, H.;
Malik, U.;
Mann, A. W.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martinez-Vazquez, C. E.;
Meza, N.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nicolaou, C.;
E., F. Olivares;
Paz-Chinchon, F.;
Points, S.;
Quirola, J.;
Rodriguez, O.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wiesner, M.;
Wood, M. L.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Aguena, M.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Bhargava, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Costanzi, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Flaugher, B.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.
Submitted: 2020-06-12
On 14 August 2019, the LIGO and Virgo Collaborations alerted the astronomical
community of a high significance detection of gravitational waves and
classified the source as a neutron star - black hole (NSBH) merger, the first
event of its kind. In search of an optical counterpart, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) Gravitational Wave Search and Discovery Team performed the most thorough
and accurate analysis to date, targeting the entire 90 percent confidence level
localization area with Blanco/DECam 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 16 nights after the
merger was detected. Objects with varying brightness were detected by the DES
Search and Discovery Pipeline and we systematically reduced the list of
candidate counterparts through catalog matching, light curve properties,
host-galaxy photometric redshifts, SOAR spectroscopic follow-up observations,
and machine-learning-based photometric classification. All candidates were
rejected as counterparts to the merger. To quantify the sensitivity of our
search, we applied our selection criteria to simulations of supernovae and
kilonovae as they would appear in the DECam observations. Since there are no
explicit light curve models for NSBH mergers, we characterize our sensitivity
with binary NS models that are expected to have similar optical signatures as
NSBH mergers. We find that if a kilonova occurred during this merger,
configurations where the ejected matter is greater than 0.07 solar masses, has
lanthanide abundance less than $10^{-8.56}$, and has a velocity between $0.18c$
and $0.21c$ are disfavored at the $2\sigma$ level. Furthermore, we estimate
that our background reduction methods are capable of associating gravitational
wave signals with a detected electromagnetic counterpart at the $4\sigma$ level
in $95\%$ of future follow-up observations.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:2001.06551 [pdf] - 2036338
Optical follow-up of gravitational wave triggers with DECam during the
first two LIGO/VIRGO observing runs
Herner, K.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Butler, R.;
Doctor, Z.;
Palmese, A.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Sobreira, F.;
Yanny, B.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Glaeser, N.;
Garcia, A.;
Sherman, N. F.;
Bechtol, K.;
Berger, E.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Cook, E.;
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Davis, T. M.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D.;
Foley, R. J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lin, H.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen, E.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Sauseda, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Avila, S.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carrasco-Kind, M.;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Everett, S.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2020-01-17, last modified: 2020-01-22
Gravitational wave (GW) events detectable by LIGO and Virgo have several
possible progenitors, including black hole mergers, neutron star mergers, black
hole--neutron star mergers, supernovae, and cosmic string cusps. A subset of GW
events are expected to produce electromagnetic (EM) emission that, once
detected, will provide complementary information about their astrophysical
context. To that end, the LIGO--Virgo Collaboration (LVC) sends GW candidate
alerts to the astronomical community so that searches for their EM counterparts
can be pursued. The DESGW group, consisting of members of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES), the LVC, and other members of the astronomical community, uses
the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) to perform a search and discovery program for
optical signatures of LVC GW events. DESGW aims to use a sample of GW events as
standard sirens for cosmology. Due to the short decay timescale of the expected
EM counterparts and the need to quickly eliminate survey areas with no
counterpart candidates, it is critical to complete the initial analysis of each
night's images as quickly as possible. We discuss our search area
determination, imaging pipeline, and candidate selection processes. We review
results from the DESGW program during the first two LIGO--Virgo observing
campaigns and introduce other science applications that our pipeline enables.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.03181 [pdf] - 1871376
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Ballester, O.;
Banerji, M.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baruah, L.;
Baumer, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M . R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bocquet, S.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busti, V.;
Campisano, R.;
Cardiel-Sas, L.;
Rosell, A. C arnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, X.;
Conselice, C.;
Costa, G.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Daues, G.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Farahi, A.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fernandez, E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Fitzpatrick, M.;
Flaugher, B.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedel, D. N.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
tanaga, E. Gaz;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gower, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Hollowood, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Juneau, S.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Khullar, G.;
Klein, M.;
Kovacs, A.;
Koziol, A. M. G.;
Krause, E.;
Kremin, A.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lasker, J.;
Li, T. S.;
Li, R. T.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
López-Reyes, P.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Maloney, J. D.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marriner, J.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McClintock, T.;
McKay, T.;
McMahon, R . G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Morganson, E.;
Mould, J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nidever, D.;
Nikutta, R.;
Nogueira, F.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Nunes, L.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Old, L.;
Olsen, K.;
Pace, A. B.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Poh, J.;
Pond, C.;
redon, A. Por;
Pujol, A.;
Refregier, A.;
Reil, K.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rooney, P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Sanchez, M. L.;
Santiago, B.;
Saro, A.;
Scarpine, V.;
Scolnic, D.;
Scott, A.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Shipp, N.;
Silveira, M. L.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, J. A.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
ira, F. Sobre;
Song, J.;
Stebbins, A.;
Suchyta, E.;
Sullivan, M.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
ker, A. R. Wal;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Wu, H.;
Yanny, B.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-01-09, last modified: 2019-04-23
We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/near-infrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
Inter-American Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES wide-area
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered point-spread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1812.01579 [pdf] - 1943240
A Search for Optical Emission from Binary-Black-Hole Merger GW170814
with the Dark Energy Camera
Doctor, Z.;
Kessler, R.;
Herner, K.;
Palmese, A.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Holz, D. E.;
Sako, M.;
Rest, A.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Berger, E.;
Foley, R. J.;
Conselice, C. J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Allam, S.;
Balbinot, E.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Chornock, R.;
Cook, E.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Farr, B.;
Fong, W.;
Frieman, J.;
Fryer, C.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Salim, S.;
Sauseda, M.;
Secco, L. F.;
Smith, N.;
Smith, R. C.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Doel, P.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2018-12-04, last modified: 2019-04-10
Binary black hole (BBH) mergers found by the LIGO and Virgo detectors are of
immense scientific interest to the astrophysics community, but are considered
unlikely to be sources of electromagnetic emission. To test whether they have
rapidly fading optical counterparts, we used the Dark Energy Camera to perform
an $i$-band search for the BBH merger GW170814, the first gravitational wave
detected by three interferometers. The 87-deg$^2$ localization region (at 90\%
confidence) centered in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) footprint enabled us to
image 86\% of the probable sky area to a depth of $i\sim 23$ mag and provide
the most comprehensive dataset to search for EM emission from BBH mergers. To
identify candidates, we perform difference imaging with our search images and
with templates from pre-existing DES images. The analysis strategy and
selection requirements were designed to remove supernovae and to identify
transients that decline in the first two epochs. We find two candidates, each
of which is spatially coincident with a star or a high-redshift galaxy in the
DES catalogs, and they are thus unlikely to be associated with GW170814. Our
search finds no candidates associated with GW170814, disfavoring rapidly
declining optical emission from BBH mergers brighter than $i\sim 23$ mag
($L_{\rm optical} \sim 5\times10^{41}$ erg/s) 1-2 days after coalescence. In
terms of GW sky map coverage, this is the most complete search for optical
counterparts to BBH mergers to date
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1903.04425 [pdf] - 1846071
Dark Matter Science in the Era of LSST
Bechtol, Keith;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Abazajian, Kevork N.;
Abidi, Muntazir;
Adhikari, Susmita;
Ali-Haïmoud, Yacine;
Annis, James;
Ansarinejad, Behzad;
Armstrong, Robert;
Asorey, Jacobo;
Baccigalupi, Carlo;
Banerjee, Arka;
Banik, Nilanjan;
Bennett, Charles;
Beutler, Florian;
Bird, Simeon;
Birrer, Simon;
Biswas, Rahul;
Biviano, Andrea;
Blazek, Jonathan;
Boddy, Kimberly K.;
Bonaca, Ana;
Borrill, Julian;
Bose, Sownak;
Bovy, Jo;
Frye, Brenda;
Brooks, Alyson M.;
Buckley, Matthew R.;
Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth;
Bulbul, Esra;
Burchat, Patricia R.;
Burgess, Cliff;
Calore, Francesca;
Caputo, Regina;
Castorina, Emanuele;
Chang, Chihway;
Chapline, George;
Charles, Eric;
Chen, Xingang;
Clowe, Douglas;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Comparat, Johan;
Croft, Rupert A. C.;
Cuoco, Alessandro;
Cyr-Racine, Francis-Yan;
D'Amico, Guido;
Davis, Tamara M;
Dawson, William A.;
de la Macorra, Axel;
Di Valentino, Eleonora;
Rivero, Ana Díaz;
Digel, Seth;
Dodelson, Scott;
Doré, Olivier;
Dvorkin, Cora;
Eckner, Christopher;
Ellison, John;
Erkal, Denis;
Farahi, Arya;
Fassnacht, Christopher D.;
Ferreira, Pedro G.;
Flaugher, Brenna;
Foreman, Simon;
Friedrich, Oliver;
Frieman, Joshua;
García-Bellido, Juan;
Gawiser, Eric;
Gerbino, Martina;
Giannotti, Maurizio;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.;
Gluscevic, Vera;
Golovich, Nathan;
Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A;
González-Morales, Alma X.;
Grin, Daniel;
Gruen, Daniel;
Hearin, Andrew P.;
Hendel, David;
Hezaveh, Yashar D.;
Hirata, Christopher M.;
Hložek, Renee;
Horiuchi, Shunsaku;
Jain, Bhuvnesh;
Jee, M. James;
Jeltema, Tesla E.;
Kamionkowski, Marc;
Kaplinghat, Manoj;
Keeley, Ryan E.;
Keeton, Charles R.;
Khatri, Rishi;
Koposov, Sergey E.;
Koushiappas, Savvas M.;
Kovetz, Ely D.;
Lahav, Ofer;
Lam, Casey;
Lee, Chien-Hsiu;
Li, Ting S.;
Liguori, Michele;
Lin, Tongyan;
Lisanti, Mariangela;
LoVerde, Marilena;
Lu, Jessica R.;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Mao, Yao-Yuan;
McDermott, Samuel D.;
McNanna, Mitch;
Medford, Michael;
Meerburg, P. Daniel;
Meyer, Manuel;
Mirbabayi, Mehrdad;
Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth;
Marc, Moniez;
More, Surhud;
Moustakas, John;
Muñoz, Julian B.;
Murgia, Simona;
Myers, Adam D.;
Nadler, Ethan O.;
Necib, Lina;
Newburgh, Laura;
Newman, Jeffrey A.;
Nord, Brian;
Nourbakhsh, Erfan;
Nuss, Eric;
O'Connor, Paul;
Pace, Andrew B.;
Padmanabhan, Hamsa;
Palmese, Antonella;
Peiris, Hiranya V.;
Peter, Annika H. G.;
Piacentni, Francesco;
Piacentini, Francesco;
Plazas, Andrés;
Polin, Daniel A.;
Prakash, Abhishek;
Prescod-Weinstein, Chanda;
Read, Justin I.;
Ritz, Steven;
Robertson, Brant E.;
Rose, Benjamin;
Rosenfeld, Rogerio;
Rossi, Graziano;
Samushia, Lado;
Sánchez, Javier;
Sánchez-Conde, Miguel A.;
Schaan, Emmanuel;
Sehgal, Neelima;
Senatore, Leonardo;
Seo, Hee-Jong;
Shafieloo, Arman;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Shipp, Nora;
Simon, Joshua D.;
Simon, Sara;
Slatyer, Tracy R.;
Slosar, Anže;
Sridhar, Srivatsan;
Stebbins, Albert;
Straniero, Oscar;
Strigari, Louis E.;
Tait, Tim M. P.;
Tollerud, Erik;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tyson, J. Anthony;
Uhlemann, Cora;
Urenña-López, L. Arturo;
Verma, Aprajita;
Vilalta, Ricardo;
Walter, Christopher W.;
Wang, Mei-Yu;
Watson, Scott;
Wechsler, Risa H.;
Wittman, David;
Xu, Weishuang;
Yanny, Brian;
Young, Sam;
Yu, Hai-Bo;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zentner, Andrew R.;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2019-03-11
Astrophysical observations currently provide the only robust, empirical
measurements of dark matter. In the coming decade, astrophysical observations
will guide other experimental efforts, while simultaneously probing unique
regions of dark matter parameter space. This white paper summarizes
astrophysical observations that can constrain the fundamental physics of dark
matter in the era of LSST. We describe how astrophysical observations will
inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as
particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational interactions with
the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we highlight
theoretical work and experimental/observational facilities that will complement
LSST to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark
matter.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1708.01530 [pdf] - 1840662
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy
Clustering and Weak Lensing
DES Collaboration;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Alarcon, A.;
Aleksić, J.;
Allam, S.;
Allen, S.;
Amara, A.;
Annis, J.;
Asorey, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bacon, D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Banerji, M.;
Banik, N.;
Barkhouse, W.;
Baumer, M.;
Baxter, E.;
Bechtol, K.;
Becker, M. R.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Benson, B. A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Bertin, E.;
Blazek, J.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Busha, M. T.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Chen, N.;
Childress, M.;
Choi, A.;
Conselice, C.;
Crittenden, R.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Das, R.;
Davis, T. M.;
Davis, C.;
De Vicente, J.;
DePoy, D. L.;
DeRose, J.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Dodelson, S.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Elliott, A. E.;
Elsner, F.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Estrada, J.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fang, Y.;
Fernandez, E.;
Ferté, A.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Friedrich, O.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Garcia-Fernandez, M.;
Gatti, M.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hinton, S. R.;
Honscheid, K.;
Hoyle, B.;
Huterer, D.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jarvis, M.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kent, S.;
Kim, A. G.;
King, A.;
Kirk, D.;
Kokron, N.;
Kovacs, A.;
Krause, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lacasa, F.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Liddle, A. R.;
Lidman, C.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Manera, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Miranda, V.;
Mudd, D.;
Muir, J.;
Möller, A.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Nugent, P.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Peacock, J.;
Peiris, H. V.;
Peoples, J.;
Percival, W. J.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Porredon, A.;
Prat, J.;
Pujol, A.;
Rau, M. M.;
Refregier, A.;
Ricker, P. M.;
Roe, N.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rosenfeld, R.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sako, M.;
Salvador, A. I.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Scolnic, D.;
Secco, L. F.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Sheldon, E.;
Smith, R. C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, J.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Tucker, B. E.;
Uddin, S. A.;
Varga, T. N.;
Vielzeuf, P.;
Vikram, V.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wang, M.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Wester, W.;
Wolf, R. C.;
Yanny, B.;
Yuan, F.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, B.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-08-04, last modified: 2019-03-01
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and
$w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.00591 [pdf] - 1751774
New Science, New Media: An Assessment of the Online Education and Public
Outreach Initiatives of The Dark Energy Survey
Wolf, R. C.;
Romer, A. K.;
Nord, B.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Biron, L.;
Cawthon, R.;
Chang, C.;
Das, R.;
Ferte, A.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gupta, R. R.;
Hamilton, S.;
Hislop, J. M.;
Jennings, E.;
Krawiec, C.;
Kremin, A.;
Li, T. S.;
Lingard, T.;
Moller, A.;
Muir, J.;
Nagasawa, D. Q.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Suchyta, E.;
Zhang, Y.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2018-04-02, last modified: 2018-09-18
As large-scale international collaborations become the standard for astronomy
research, a wealth of opportunities have emerged to create innovative education
and public outreach (EPO) programming. In the past two decades, large
collaborations have focused EPO strategies around published data products.
Newer collaborations have begun to explore other avenues of public engagement
before and after data are made available. We present a case study of the online
EPO program of The Dark Energy Survey, currently one of the largest
international astronomy collaborations actively taking data. DES EPO is unique
at this scale in astronomy, as far as we are aware, as it evolved organically
from scientists' passion for EPO and is entirely organized and implemented by
the volunteer efforts of collaboration scientists. We summarize the strategy
and implementation of eight EPO initiatives. For content distributed via social
media, we present reach and user statistics over the 2016 calendar year. DES
EPO online products reached ~2,500 users per post, and 94% of these users
indicate a predisposition to science-related interests. We find no obvious
correlation between post type and post reach, with the most popular posts
featuring the intersections of science and art and/or popular culture. We
conclude that one key issue of the online DES EPO program was designing
material which would inspire new interest in science. The greatest difficulty
of the online DES EPO program was sustaining scientist participation and
collaboration support; the most successful programs are those which capitalized
on the hobbies of participating scientists. We present statistics and
recommendations, along with observations from individual experience, as a
potentially instructive resource for scientists or EPO professionals interested
in organizing EPO programs and partnerships for large science collaborations or
organizations.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05045 [pdf] - 1722433
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and
lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data
Gruen, D.;
Friedrich, O.;
Krause, E.;
DeRose, J.;
Cawthon, R.;
Davis, C.;
Elvin-Poole, J.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Alarcon, A.;
Bernstein, G. M.;
Blazek, J.;
Chang, C.;
Clampitt, J.;
Crocce, M.;
De Vicente, J.;
Gatti, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Hilbert, S.;
Hoyle, B.;
Jain, B.;
Jarvis, M.;
Lahav, O.;
MacCrann, N.;
McClintock, T.;
Prat, J.;
Rollins, R. P.;
Ross, A. J.;
Rozo, E.;
Samuroff, S.;
Sánchez, C.;
Sheldon, E.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Zuntz, J.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Bridle, S. L.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roodman, A.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Weller, J.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2017-10-13, last modified: 2018-07-24
We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved large-scale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and counts-in-cells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
N-body simulation realizations and log-normal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear two-point functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05459 [pdf] - 1589775
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical
Counterpart
Soares-Santos, M.;
Holz, D. E.;
Annis, J.;
Chornock, R.;
Herner, K.;
Berger, E.;
Brout, D.;
Chen, H.;
Kessler, R.;
Sako, M.;
Allam, S.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Butler, R. E.;
Palmese, A.;
Doctor, Z.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Frieman, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Lin, H.;
Scolnic, D.;
Cowperthwaite, P.;
Neilsen, E.;
Marriner, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Hartley, W. G.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Balbinot, E.;
Blanchard, P.;
Brown, D. A.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Conselice, C.;
Cook, E. R.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Durret, F.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S . S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Hanna, C.;
Kasen, D.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Margutti, R.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Matheson, T.;
Medina, G. E.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Muir, J.;
Nicholl, M.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Sobreira, F.;
Stebbins, A.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuhlmann, S.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Petravick, D.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
post-merger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours post-merger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
-15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multi-messenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitational-wave sources.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1710.05840 [pdf] - 1589828
The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger
LIGO/VIRGO GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-IR Light Curves and Comparison
to Kilonova Models
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Villar, V. A.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Nicholl, M.;
Chornock, R.;
Blanchard, P. K.;
Fong, W.;
Margutti, R.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Alexander, K. D.;
Allam, S.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Butler, R. E.;
Chen, H. -Y.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drout, M. R.;
Eftekhari, T.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Fryer, C. L.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Guillochon, J.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Neilsen,, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Palmese, A.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D. M.;
Smith, N.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Balbinot, E.;
Carlin, J. L.;
Cook, E. R.;
Durret, F.;
Li, T. S.;
Lopes, P. A. A.;
Lourenço, A. C. C.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Medina, G. E.;
Muir, J.;
Muñoz, R. R.;
Sauseda, M.;
Schlegel, D. J.;
Secco, L. F.;
Vivas, A. K.;
Wester, W.;
Zenteno, A.;
Zhang, Y.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Davis, C.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Fernandez, E.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
Jain, B.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Kent, S.;
Krause, E.;
Kron, R.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Lin, H.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Martini, P.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Roe, N.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Troxel, M. A.;
Vikram, V.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wechsler, R. H.;
Weller, J.;
Yanny, B.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2017-10-16
We present UV, optical, and NIR photometry of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave source from Advanced LIGO/Virgo, the binary
neutron star merger GW170817. Our data set extends from the discovery of the
optical counterpart at $0.47$ days to $18.5$ days post-merger, and includes
observations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), Gemini-South/FLAMINGOS-2
(GS/F2), and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). The spectral energy
distribution (SED) inferred from this photometry at $0.6$ days is well
described by a blackbody model with $T\approx 8300$ K, a radius of $R\approx
4.5\times 10^{14}$ cm (corresponding to an expansion velocity of $v\approx
0.3c$), and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\approx 5\times10^{41}$ erg
s$^{-1}$. At $1.5$ days we find a multi-component SED across the optical and
NIR, and subsequently we observe rapid fading in the UV and blue optical bands
and significant reddening of the optical/NIR colors. Modeling the entire data
set we find that models with heating from radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni, or
those with only a single component of opacity from $r$-process elements, fail
to capture the rapid optical decline and red optical/NIR colors. Instead,
models with two components consistent with lanthanide-poor and lanthanide-rich
ejecta provide a good fit to the data, the resulting "blue" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.01$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.3$c, and the "red" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.04$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.1$c. These ejecta masses are broadly
consistent with the estimated $r$-process production rate required to explain
the Milky Way $r$-process abundances, providing the first evidence that BNS
mergers can be a dominant site of $r$-process enrichment.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.00072 [pdf] - 1557860
Discovery of the Lensed Quasar System DES J0408-5354
Lin, H.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Agnello, A.;
Ostrovski, F.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Nord, B.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Treu, T.;
Chan, J. H. H.;
Suyu, S. H.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Collett, T.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
More, A.;
Amara, A.;
Auger, M. W.;
Courbin, F.;
Fassnacht, C. D.;
Frieman, J.;
Marshall, P. J.;
Meylan, G.;
Rusu, C. E.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Banerji, M.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Crocce, M.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Eifler, T. F.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Lahav, O.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
March, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Schindler, R.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.
Submitted: 2017-01-31
We report the discovery and spectroscopic confirmation of the quad-like
lensed quasar system DES J0408-5354 found in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year
1 (Y1) data. This system was discovered during a search for DES Y1 strong
lensing systems using a method that identified candidates as red galaxies with
multiple blue neighbors. DES J0408-5354 consists of a central red galaxy
surrounded by three bright (i < 20) blue objects and a fourth red object.
Subsequent spectroscopic observations using the Gemini South telescope
confirmed that the three blue objects are indeed the lensed images of a quasar
with redshift z = 2.375, and that the central red object is an early-type
lensing galaxy with redshift z = 0.597. DES J0408-5354 is the first quad lensed
quasar system to be found in DES and begins to demonstrate the potential of DES
to discover and dramatically increase the sample size of these very rare
objects.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.04538 [pdf] - 1477626
A DECam Search for an Optical Counterpart to the LIGO Gravitational Wave
Event GW151226
Cowperthwaite, P. S.;
Berger, E.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Annis, J.;
Brout, D.;
Brown, D. A.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Cenko, S. B.;
Chen, H. Y.;
Chornock, R.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doctor, Z.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Drout, M. R.;
Farr, B.;
Finley, D. A.;
Foley, R. J.;
Fong, W.;
Fox, D. B.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcia-Bellido, J.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Herner, K.;
Holz, D. E.;
Kasen, D.;
Kessler, R.;
Lin, H.;
Margutti, R.;
Marriner, J.;
Matheson, T.;
Metzger, B. D.;
Neilsen, E. H.;
Quataert, E.;
Rest, A.;
Sako, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Smith, N.;
Sobreira, F.;
Strampelli, G. M.;
Villar, V. A.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Williams, P. K. G.;
Yanny, B.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Armstrong, R.;
Bechtol, K.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Neto, A. Fausti;
Fosalba, P.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Giannantonio, T.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Johnson, M. W. G.;
Johnson, M. D.;
Krause, E.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Menanteau, F.;
Miquel, R.;
Mohr, J. J.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Reil, K.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Thomas, R. C.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Weller, J.
Submitted: 2016-06-14, last modified: 2016-09-08
We report the results of a Dark Energy Camera (DECam) optical follow-up of
the gravitational wave (GW) event GW151226, discovered by the Advanced LIGO
detectors. Our observations cover 28.8 deg$^2$ of the localization region in
the $i$ and $z$ bands (containing 3% of the BAYESTAR localization probability),
starting 10 hours after the event was announced and spanning four epochs at
$2-24$ days after the GW detection. We achieve $5\sigma$ point-source limiting
magnitudes of $i\approx21.7$ and $z\approx21.5$, with a scatter of $0.4$ mag,
in our difference images. Given the two day delay, we search this area for a
rapidly declining optical counterpart with $\gtrsim 3\sigma$ significance
steady decline between the first and final observations. We recover four
sources that pass our selection criteria, of which three are cataloged AGN. The
fourth source is offset by $5.8$ arcsec from the center of a galaxy at a
distance of 187 Mpc, exhibits a rapid decline by $0.5$ mag over $4$ days, and
has a red color of $i-z\approx 0.3$ mag. These properties roughly match the
expectations for a kilonova. However, this source was detected several times,
starting $94$ days prior to GW151226, in the Pan-STARRS Survey for Transients
(dubbed as PS15cdi) and is therefore unrelated to the GW event. Given its
long-term behavior, PS15cdi is likely a Type IIP supernova that transitioned
out of its plateau phase during our observations, mimicking a kilonova-like
behavior. We comment on the implications of this detection for contamination in
future optical follow-up observations.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1512.03062 [pdf] - 1457140
Observation and Confirmation of Six Strong Lensing Systems in The Dark
Energy Survey Science Verification Data
Nord, B.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Lin, H.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Helsby, J.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Amara, A.;
Collett, T.;
Allam, S.;
Caminha, G.;
De Bom, C.;
Desai, S.;
Dúmet-Montoya, H.;
Pereira, M. Elidaiana da S.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Furlanetto, C.;
Gaitsch, H.;
Gill, M.;
Merritt, K. W.;
More, A.;
Tucker, D.;
Rykoff, E. S.;
Rozo, E.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Agnello, A.;
Auger, M.;
Brunner, R. J.;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Castander, F. J.;
Cunha, C. E.;
da Costa, L. N.;
Foley, R.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Glazebrook, K.;
Gschwend, J.;
Hartley, W.;
Kessler, R.;
Lagattuta, D.;
Lewis, G.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Makler, M.;
Menanteau, F.;
Niernberg, A.;
Scolnic, D.;
Vieira, J. D.;
Gramillano, R.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Banerji, M.;
Benoit-Lévy, A.;
Brooks, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Capozzi, D.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Carretero, J.;
D'Andrea, C. B.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Frieman, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Gruen, D.;
Honscheid, K.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Martini, P.;
Melchior, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Neilsen, E.;
Nichol, R. C.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Thaler, J.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.;
Zhang, Y.;
Collaboration, the DES
Submitted: 2015-12-09
We report the observation and confirmation of the first group- and
cluster-scale strong gravitational lensing systems found in Dark Energy Survey
(DES) data. Through visual inspection of data from the Science Verification
(SV) season, we identified 53 candidate systems. We then obtained spectroscopic
follow-up of 21 candidates using the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) at
the Gemini South telescope and the Inamori-Magellan Areal Camera and
Spectrograph (IMACS) at the Magellan/Baade telescope. With this follow-up, we
confirmed six candidates as gravitational lenses: Three of the systems are
newly discovered, and the remaining three were previously known. Of the 21
observed candidates, the remaining 15 were either not detected in spectroscopic
observations, were observed and did not exhibit continuum emission (or spectral
features), or were ruled out as lensing systems. The confirmed sample consists
of one group-scale and five galaxy cluster-scale lenses. The lensed sources
range in redshift z ~ 0.80-3.2, and in i-band surface brightness i_{SB} ~ 23-25
mag/sq.-arcsec. (2" aperture). For each of the six systems, we estimate the
Einstein radius and the enclosed mass, which have ranges ~ 5.0 - 8.6" and ~ 7.5
x 10^{12} - 6.4 x 10^{13} solar masses, respectively.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1412.1825 [pdf] - 1005617
GREAT3 results I: systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact
of real galaxy morphology
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Armstrong, Robert;
Bard, Deborah;
Bertin, Emmanuel;
Bosch, James;
Boutigny, Dominique;
Courbin, Frederic;
Dawson, William A.;
Donnarumma, Annamaria;
Conti, Ian Fenech;
Gavazzi, Raphael;
Gentile, Marc;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.;
Hogg, David W.;
Huff, Eric M.;
Jee, M. James;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Kilbinger, Martin;
Kuntzer, Thibault;
Lang, Dustin;
Luo, Wentao;
March, Marisa C.;
Marshall, Philip J.;
Meyers, Joshua E.;
Miller, Lance;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Mboula, Fred Maurice Ngole;
Nurbaeva, Guldariya;
Okura, Yuki;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schneider, Michael D.;
Shan, Huanyuan;
Sheldon, Erin S.;
Simet, Melanie;
Starck, Jean-Luc;
Sureau, Florent;
Tewes, Malte;
Adami, Kristian Zarb;
Zhang, Jun;
Zuntz, Joe
Submitted: 2014-12-04, last modified: 2015-04-02
We present first results from the third GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy
Testing (GREAT3) challenge, the third in a sequence of challenges for testing
methods of inferring weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from
simulated galaxy images. GREAT3 was divided into experiments to test three
specific questions, and included simulated space- and ground-based data with
constant or cosmologically-varying shear fields. The simplest (control)
experiment included parametric galaxies with a realistic distribution of
signal-to-noise, size, and ellipticity, and a complex point spread function
(PSF). The other experiments tested the additional impact of realistic galaxy
morphology, multiple exposure imaging, and the uncertainty about a
spatially-varying PSF; the last two questions will be explored in Paper II. The
24 participating teams competed to estimate lensing shears to within systematic
error tolerances for upcoming Stage-IV dark energy surveys, making 1525
submissions overall. GREAT3 saw considerable variety and innovation in the
types of methods applied. Several teams now meet or exceed the targets in many
of the tests conducted (to within the statistical errors). We conclude that the
presence of realistic galaxy morphology in simulations changes shear
calibration biases by $\sim 1$ per cent for a wide range of methods. Other
effects such as truncation biases due to finite galaxy postage stamps, and the
impact of galaxy type as measured by the S\'{e}rsic index, are quantified for
the first time. Our results generalize previous studies regarding sensitivities
to galaxy size and signal-to-noise, and to PSF properties such as seeing and
defocus. Almost all methods' results support the simple model in which additive
shear biases depend linearly on PSF ellipticity.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1407.7676 [pdf] - 935774
GalSim: The modular galaxy image simulation toolkit
Rowe, Barnaby;
Jarvis, Mike;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Bernstein, Gary M.;
Bosch, James;
Simet, Melanie;
Meyers, Joshua E.;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Zuntz, Joe;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Dietrich, Joerg P.;
Armstrong, Robert;
Melchior, Peter;
Gill, Mandeep S. S.
Submitted: 2014-07-29, last modified: 2015-02-15
GALSIM is a collaborative, open-source project aimed at providing an image
simulation tool of enduring benefit to the astronomical community. It provides
a software library for generating images of astronomical objects such as stars
and galaxies in a variety of ways, efficiently handling image transformations
and operations such as convolution and rendering at high precision. We describe
the GALSIM software and its capabilities, including necessary theoretical
background. We demonstrate that the performance of GALSIM meets the stringent
requirements of high precision image analysis applications such as weak
gravitational lensing, for current datasets and for the Stage IV dark energy
surveys of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, ESA's Euclid mission, and
NASA's WFIRST-AFTA mission. The GALSIM project repository is public and
includes the full code history, all open and closed issues, installation
instructions, documentation, and wiki pages (including a Frequently Asked
Questions section). The GALSIM repository can be found at
https://github.com/GalSim-developers/GalSim .
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1205.4688 [pdf] - 873785
Is the transition redshift a new cosmological number?
Submitted: 2012-05-21, last modified: 2014-09-29
Observations from Supernovae Type Ia (SNe Ia) provided strong evidence for an
expanding accelerating Universe at intermediate redshifts. This means that the
Universe underwent a transition from deceleration to acceleration phases at a
transition redshift $z_t$ of the order unity whose value in principle depends
on the cosmology as well as on the assumed gravitational theory. Since
cosmological accelerating models endowed with a transition redshift are
extremely degenerated, in principle, it is interesting to know whether the
value of $z_t$ itself can be observationally used as a new cosmic
discriminator. After a brief discussion of the potential dynamic role played by
the transition redshift, it is argued that future observations combining SNe
Ia, the line-of-sight (or "radial") baryon acoustic oscillations, the
differential age of galaxies, as well as the redshift drift of the spectral
lines may tightly constrain $z_t$, thereby helping to narrow the parameter
space for the most realistic models describing the accelerating Universe.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1308.4982 [pdf] - 1178725
The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (GREAT3) Challenge
Handbook
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Bosch, James;
Chang, Chihway;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gill, Mandeep;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kannawadi, Arun;
Kacprzak, Tomasz;
Lackner, Claire;
Leauthaud, Alexie;
Miyatake, Hironao;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Rhodes, Jason;
Simet, Melanie;
Zuntz, Joe;
Armstrong, Bob;
Bridle, Sarah;
Coupon, Jean;
Dietrich, Jörg P.;
Gentile, Marc;
Heymans, Catherine;
Jurling, Alden S.;
Kent, Stephen M.;
Kirkby, David;
Margala, Daniel;
Massey, Richard;
Melchior, Peter;
Peterson, John;
Roodman, Aaron;
Schrabback, Tim
Submitted: 2013-08-22, last modified: 2014-02-28
The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 3 (GREAT3) challenge is the third
in a series of image analysis challenges, with a goal of testing and
facilitating the development of methods for analyzing astronomical images that
will be used to measure weak gravitational lensing. This measurement requires
extremely precise estimation of very small galaxy shape distortions, in the
presence of far larger intrinsic galaxy shapes and distortions due to the
blurring kernel caused by the atmosphere, telescope optics, and instrumental
effects. The GREAT3 challenge is posed to the astronomy, machine learning, and
statistics communities, and includes tests of three specific effects that are
of immediate relevance to upcoming weak lensing surveys, two of which have
never been tested in a community challenge before. These effects include
realistically complex galaxy models based on high-resolution imaging from
space; spatially varying, physically-motivated blurring kernel; and combination
of multiple different exposures. To facilitate entry by people new to the
field, and for use as a diagnostic tool, the simulation software for the
challenge is publicly available, though the exact parameters used for the
challenge are blinded. Sample scripts to analyze the challenge data using
existing methods will also be provided. See http://great3challenge.info and
http://great3.projects.phys.ucl.ac.uk/leaderboard/ for more information.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:1301.0060 [pdf] - 713721
On the accuracy of the Perturbative Approach for Strong Lensing: Local
Distortion for Pseudo-Elliptical Models
Submitted: 2013-01-01, last modified: 2013-05-29
The Perturbative Approach (PA) introduced by \citet{alard07} provides
analytic solutions for gravitational arcs by solving the lens equation
linearized around the Einstein ring solution. This is a powerful method for
lens inversion and simulations in that it can be used, in principle, for
generic lens models. In this paper we aim to quantify the domain of validity of
this method for three quantities derived from the linearized mapping: caustics,
critical curves, and the deformation cross section (i.e. the arc cross section
in the infinitesimal circular source approximation). We consider lens models
with elliptical potentials, in particular the Singular Isothermal Elliptic
Potential and Pseudo-Elliptical Navarro--Frenk--White models. We show that the
PA is exact for this first model. For the second, we obtain constraints on the
model parameter space (given by the potential ellipticity parameter
$\varepsilon$ and characteristic convergence $\kappa_s$) such that the PA is
accurate for the aforementioned quantities. In this process we obtain analytic
expressions for several lensing functions, which are valid for the PA in
general. The determination of this domain of validity could have significant
implications for the use of the PA, but it still needs to be probed with
extended sources.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:1202.5254 [pdf] - 630580
Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
Kitching, T. D.;
Balan, S. T.;
Bridle, S.;
Cantale, N.;
Courbin, F.;
Eifler, T.;
Gentile, M.;
Gill, M. S. S.;
Harmeling, S.;
Heymans, C.;
Hirsch, M.;
Honscheid, K.;
Kacprzak, T.;
Kirkby, D.;
Margala, D.;
Massey, R. J.;
Melchior, P.;
Nurbaeva, G.;
Patton, K.;
Rhodes, J.;
Rowe, B. T. P.;
Taylor, A. N.;
Tewes, M.;
Viola, M.;
Witherick, D.;
Voigt, L.;
Young, J.;
Zuntz, J.
Submitted: 2012-02-23, last modified: 2013-02-25
In this paper we present results from the weak lensing shape measurement
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Galaxy Challenge. This
marks an order of magnitude step change in the level of scrutiny employed in
weak lensing shape measurement analysis. We provide descriptions of each method
tested and include 10 evaluation metrics over 24 simulation branches. GREAT10
was the first shape measurement challenge to include variable fields; both the
shear field and the Point Spread Function (PSF) vary across the images in a
realistic manner. The variable fields enable a variety of metrics that are
inaccessible to constant shear simulations including a direct measure of the
impact of shape measurement inaccuracies, and the impact of PSF size and
ellipticity, on the shear power spectrum. To assess the impact of shape
measurement bias for cosmic shear we present a general pseudo-Cl formalism,
that propagates spatially varying systematics in cosmic shear through to power
spectrum estimates. We also show how one-point estimators of bias can be
extracted from variable shear simulations. The GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
received 95 submissions and saw a factor of 3 improvement in the accuracy
achieved by shape measurement methods. The best methods achieve sub-percent
average biases. We find a strong dependence in accuracy as a function of
signal-to-noise, and indications of a weak dependence on galaxy type and size.
Some requirements for the most ambitious cosmic shear experiments are met above
a signal-to-noise ratio of 20. These results have the caveat that the simulated
PSF was a ground-based PSF. Our results are a snapshot of the accuracy of
current shape measurement methods and are a benchmark upon which improvement
can continue. This provides a foundation for a better understanding of the
strengths and limitations of shape measurement methods.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:1210.1979 [pdf] - 1151921
Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Star Challenge
Kitching, T. D.;
Rowe, B.;
Gill, M.;
Heymans, C.;
Massey, R.;
Witherick, D.;
Courbin, F.;
Georgatzis, K.;
Gentile, M.;
Gruen, D.;
Kilbinger, M.;
Li, G. L.;
Mariglis, A. P.;
Meylan, G.;
Storkey, A.;
Xin, B.
Submitted: 2012-10-06
We present the results from the first public blind PSF reconstruction
challenge, the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Star
Challenge. Reconstruction of a spatially varying PSF, sparsely sampled by
stars, at non-star positions is a critical part in the image analysis for weak
lensing where inaccuracies in the modelled ellipticity and size-squared can
impact the ability to measure the shapes of galaxies. This is of importance
because weak lensing is a particularly sensitive probe of dark energy, and can
be used to map the mass distribution of large scale structure. Participants in
the challenge were presented with 27,500 stars over 1300 images subdivided into
26 sets, where in each set a category change was made in the type or spatial
variation of the PSF. Thirty submissions were made by 9 teams. The best methods
reconstructed the PSF with an accuracy of ~0.00025 in ellipticity and ~0.00074
in size squared. For a fixed pixel scale narrower PSFs were found to be more
difficult to model than larger PSFs, and the PSF reconstruction was severely
degraded with the inclusion of an atmospheric turbulence model (although this
result is likely to be a strong function of the amplitude of the turbulence
power spectrum).
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0779 [pdf] - 445530
Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook
Kitching, Thomas;
Balan, Sreekumar;
Bernstein, Gary;
Bethge, Matthias;
Bridle, Sarah;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gentile, Marc;
Heavens, Alan;
Hirsch, Michael;
Hosseini, Reshad;
Kiessling, Alina;
Amara, Adam;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Nurbaeva, Guldariya;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Rassat, Anais;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schölkopf, Bernhard;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Gill, Mandeep;
Shmakova, Marina;
Taylor, Andy;
Velander, Malin;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Witherick, Dugan;
Wittman, David;
Harmeling, Stefan;
Heymans, Catherine;
Massey, Richard;
Rowe, Barnaby;
Schrabback, Tim;
Voigt, Lisa
Submitted: 2010-09-03, last modified: 2011-11-30
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:1003.0280 [pdf] - 1025444
The dynamical state of the Globular Cluster M10 (NGC 6254)
Submitted: 2010-03-01
Studying the radial variation of the stellar mass function in globular
clusters (GCs) has proved a valuable tool to explore the collisional dynamics
leading to mass segregation and core collapse. In order to study the radial
dependence of the luminosity and mass function of M 10, we used ACS/HST deep
high resolution archival images, reaching out to approximately the cluster's
half-mass radius (rhm), combined with deep WFPC2 images that extend our radial
coverage to more than 2 rhm. From our photometry, we derived a radial mass
segregation profile and a global mass function that we compared with those of
simulated clusters containing different energy sources (namely hard binaries
and/or an IMBH) able to halt core collapse and to quench mass segregation. A
set of direct N-body simulations of GCs, with and without an IMBH of mass 1% of
the total cluster mass, comprising different initial mass functions (IMFs) and
primordial binary fractions, was used to predict the observed mass segregation
profile and mass function. The mass segregation profile of M 10 is not
compatible with cluster models without either an IMBH or primordial binaries,
as a source of energy appears to be moderately quenching mass segregation in
the cluster. Unfortunately, the present observational uncertainty on the binary
fraction in M10 does not allow us to confirm the presence of an IMBH in the
cluster, since an IMBH, a dynamically non-negligible binary fraction (~ 5%), or
both can equally well explain the radial dependence of the cluster mass
function.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:0909.3856 [pdf] - 28616
An Analysis of DES Cluster Simulations through the IMCAT and Shapelets
Weak Lensing Pipelines
Gill, M. S. S.;
Young, J. C.;
Draskovic, J. P.;
Honscheid, K.;
Lin, H.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Martini, P.;
Peeples, M.;
Rozo, E.;
Smith, G. N.;
Weinberg, D. H.
Submitted: 2009-09-21
We have run two completely independent weak lensing analysis pipelines on a
set of realistic simulated images of a massive galaxy cluster with a singular
isothermal sphere profile (galaxy velocity dispersion sigma_v=1250 km/ sec).
The suite of images was constructed using the simulation tools developed by the
Dark Energy Survey. We find that both weak lensing pipelines can accurately
recover the velocity dispersion of our simulated clusters, suggesting that
current weak lensing tools are accurate enough for measuring the shear profile
of massive clusters in upcoming large photometric surveys. We also demonstrate
how choices of some cuts influence the final shear profile and sigma_v
measurement. Analogously to the STEP program, we make all of these cluster
simulation images publically available for other groups to analyze through
their own weak lensing pipelines.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:0908.0945 [pdf] - 1003324
Results of the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for
cosmological lensing
Bridle, Sarah;
Balan, Sreekumar T.;
Bethge, Matthias;
Gentile, Marc;
Harmeling, Stefan;
Heymans, Catherine;
Hirsch, Michael;
Hosseini, Reshad;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kitching, Thomas;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Lewis, Antony;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Scholkopf, Bernhard;
Velander, Malin;
Voigt, Lisa;
Witherick, Dugan;
Amara, Adam;
Bernstein, Gary;
Courbin, Frederic;
Gill, Mandeep;
Heavens, Alan;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Massey, Richard;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Rassat, Anais;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schrabback, Tim;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Shmakova, Marina;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Wittman, David
Submitted: 2009-08-07
We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge
to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary
goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers
outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were
presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted
results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million
simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, point-spread function
ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations
allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy
suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first
time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter
space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A
number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a
re-examination of the process of combining information from different galaxies,
which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image
simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges,
meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional
developments in shear measurement algorithms.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:0802.1214 [pdf] - 9903
Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for
cosmological lensing
Bridle, Sarah;
Shawe-Taylor, John;
Amara, Adam;
Applegate, Douglas;
Balan, Sreekumar T.;
Berge, Joel;
Bernstein, Gary;
Dahle, Hakon;
Erben, Thomas;
Gill, Mandeep;
Heavens, Alan;
Heymans, Catherine;
High, F. William;
Hoekstra, Henk;
Jarvis, Mike;
Kirk, Donnacha;
Kitching, Thomas;
Kneib, Jean-Paul;
Kuijken, Konrad;
Lagatutta, David;
Mandelbaum, Rachel;
Massey, Richard;
Mellier, Yannick;
Moghaddam, Baback;
Moudden, Yassir;
Nakajima, Reiko;
Paulin-Henriksson, Stephane;
Pires, Sandrine;
Rassat, Anais;
Refregier, Alexandre;
Rhodes, Jason;
Schrabback, Tim;
Semboloni, Elisabetta;
Shmakova, Marina;
van Waerbeke, Ludovic;
Witherick, Dugan;
Voigt, Lisa;
Wittman, David
Submitted: 2008-02-11, last modified: 2009-06-15
The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2008 (GREAT08) Challenge focuses
on a problem that is of crucial importance for future observations in
cosmology. The shapes of distant galaxies can be used to determine the
properties of dark energy and the nature of gravity, because light from those
galaxies is bent by gravity from the intervening dark matter. The observed
galaxy images appear distorted, although only slightly, and their shapes must
be precisely disentangled from the effects of pixelisation, convolution and
noise. The worldwide gravitational lensing community has made significant
progress in techniques to measure these distortions via the Shear TEsting
Program (STEP). Via STEP, we have run challenges within our own community, and
come to recognise that this particular image analysis problem is ideally
matched to experts in statistical inference, inverse problems and computational
learning. Thus, in order to continue the progress seen in recent years, we are
seeking an infusion of new ideas from these communities. This document details
the GREAT08 Challenge for potential participants. Please visit
http://www.great08challenge.info for the latest information.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:0904.3326 [pdf] - 315850
Mass Segregation in NGC 2298: limits on the presence of an Intermediate
Mass Black Hole
Submitted: 2009-04-21
[abridged] Theoretical investigations have suggested the presence of
Intermediate Mass Black Holes (IMBHs, with masses in the 100-10000 Msun range)
in the cores of some Globular Clusters (GCs). In this paper we present the
first application of a new technique to determine the presence or absence of a
central IMBH in globular clusters that have reached energy equipartition via
two-body relaxation. The method is based on the measurement of the radial
profile for the average mass of stars in the system, using the fact that a
quenching of mass segregation is expected when an IMBH is present. Here we
measure the radial profile of mass segregation using main-sequence stars for
the globular cluster NGC 2298 from resolved source photometry based on HST-ACS
data. The observations are compared to expectations from direct N-body
simulations of the dynamics of star clusters with and without an IMBH. The mass
segregation profile for NGC 2298 is quantitatively matched to that inferred
from simulations without a central massive object over all the radial range
probed by the observations, that is from the center to about two half-mass
radii. Profiles from simulations containing an IMBH more massive than ~ 300-500
Msun (depending on the assumed total mass of NGC 2298) are instead inconsistent
with the data at about 3 sigma confidence, irrespective of the IMF and binary
fraction chosen for these runs. While providing a null result in the quest of
detecting a central black hole in globular clusters, the data-model comparison
carried out here demonstrates the feasibility of the method which can also be
applied to other globular clusters with resolved photometry in their cores.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:0806.4187 [pdf] - 13902
Intermediate Mass Black Hole Induced Quenching of Mass Segregation in
Star Clusters
Submitted: 2008-06-25
In many theoretical scenarios it is expected that intermediate-mass black
holes (IMBHs, with masses M ~ 100-10000 solar masses) reside at the centers of
some globular clusters. However, observational evidence for their existence is
limited. Several previous numerical investigations have focused on the impact
of an IMBH on the cluster dynamics or brightness profile. Here we instead
present results from a large set of direct N-body simulations including single
and binary stars. These show that there is a potentially more detectable IMBH
signature, namely on the variation of the average stellar mass between the
center and the half-light radius. We find that the existence of an IMBH
quenches mass segregation and causes the average mass to exhibit only modest
radial variation in collisionally relaxed star clusters. This differs from when
there is no IMBH. To measure this observationally requires high resolution
imaging at the level of that already available from the Hubble Space Telescope
(HST) for the cores of a large sample of galactic globular clusters. With a
modest additional investment of HST time to acquire fields around the
half-light radius, it will be possible to identify the best candidate clusters
to harbor an IMBH. This test can be applied only to globulars with a half-light
relaxation time less than or equal to 1 Gyr, which is required to guarantee
efficient energy equipartition due to two-body relaxation.
