Normalized to: Gibbons, S.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1801.02634 [pdf] - 1739863
The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and
status of the v2.0 core package
The Astropy Collaboration;
Price-Whelan, A. M.;
Sipőcz, B. M.;
Günther, H. M.;
Lim, P. L.;
Crawford, S. M.;
Conseil, S.;
Shupe, D. L.;
Craig, M. W.;
Dencheva, N.;
Ginsburg, A.;
VanderPlas, J. T.;
Bradley, L. D.;
Pérez-Suárez, D.;
de Val-Borro, M.;
Aldcroft, T. L.;
Cruz, K. L.;
Robitaille, T. P.;
Tollerud, E. J.;
Ardelean, C.;
Babej, T.;
Bachetti, M.;
Bakanov, A. V.;
Bamford, S. P.;
Barentsen, G.;
Barmby, P.;
Baumbach, A.;
Berry, K. L.;
Biscani, F.;
Boquien, M.;
Bostroem, K. A.;
Bouma, L. G.;
Brammer, G. B.;
Bray, E. M.;
Breytenbach, H.;
Buddelmeijer, H.;
Burke, D. J.;
Calderone, G.;
Rodríguez, J. L. Cano;
Cara, M.;
Cardoso, J. V. M.;
Cheedella, S.;
Copin, Y.;
Crichton, D.;
DÁvella, D.;
Deil, C.;
Depagne, É.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Donath, A.;
Droettboom, M.;
Earl, N.;
Erben, T.;
Fabbro, S.;
Ferreira, L. A.;
Finethy, T.;
Fox, R. T.;
Garrison, L. H.;
Gibbons, S. L. J.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gommers, R.;
Greco, J. P.;
Greenfield, P.;
Groener, A. M.;
Grollier, F.;
Hagen, A.;
Hirst, P.;
Homeier, D.;
Horton, A. J.;
Hosseinzadeh, G.;
Hu, L.;
Hunkeler, J. S.;
Ivezić, Ž.;
Jain, A.;
Jenness, T.;
Kanarek, G.;
Kendrew, S.;
Kern, N. S.;
Kerzendorf, W. E.;
Khvalko, A.;
King, J.;
Kirkby, D.;
Kulkarni, A. M.;
Kumar, A.;
Lee, A.;
Lenz, D.;
Littlefair, S. P.;
Ma, Z.;
Macleod, D. M.;
Mastropietro, M.;
McCully, C.;
Montagnac, S.;
Morris, B. M.;
Mueller, M.;
Mumford, S. J.;
Muna, D.;
Murphy, N. A.;
Nelson, S.;
Nguyen, G. H.;
Ninan, J. P.;
Nöthe, M.;
Ogaz, S.;
Oh, S.;
Parejko, J. K.;
Parley, N.;
Pascual, S.;
Patil, R.;
Patil, A. A.;
Plunkett, A. L.;
Prochaska, J. X.;
Rastogi, T.;
Janga, V. Reddy;
Sabater, J.;
Sakurikar, P.;
Seifert, M.;
Sherbert, L. E.;
Sherwood-Taylor, H.;
Shih, A. Y.;
Sick, J.;
Silbiger, M. T.;
Singanamalla, S.;
Singer, L. P.;
Sladen, P. H.;
Sooley, K. A.;
Sornarajah, S.;
Streicher, O.;
Teuben, P.;
Thomas, S. W.;
Tremblay, G. R.;
Turner, J. E. H.;
Terrón, V.;
van Kerkwijk, M. H.;
de la Vega, A.;
Watkins, L. L.;
Weaver, B. A.;
Whitmore, J. B.;
Woillez, J.;
Zabalza, V.
Submitted: 2018-01-08, last modified: 2018-01-16
The Astropy project supports and fosters the development of open-source and
openly-developed Python packages that provide commonly-needed functionality to
the astronomical community. A key element of the Astropy project is the core
package Astropy, which serves as the foundation for more specialized projects
and packages. In this article, we provide an overview of the organization of
the Astropy project and summarize key features in the core package as of the
recent major release, version 2.0. We then describe the project infrastructure
designed to facilitate and support development for a broader ecosystem of
inter-operable packages. We conclude with a future outlook of planned new
features and directions for the broader Astropy project.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.04852 [pdf] - 1581199
Eight new luminous z > 6 quasars selected via SED model fitting of
VISTA, WISE and Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Observations
Reed, S. L.;
McMahon, R. G.;
Martini, P.;
Banerji, M.;
Auger, M.;
Hewett, P. C.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Gibbons, S. L. J.;
Gonzalez-Solares, E.;
Ostrovski, F.;
Tie, S. S.;
Abdalla, F. B.;
Allam, S.;
Benoit-Levy, A.;
Bertin, E.;
Brooks, D.;
Buckley-Geer, E.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
da Costa, L. N.;
DePoy, D. L.;
Desai, S.;
Diehl, H. T.;
Doel, P.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
Frieman, J.;
Garcıa-Bellido, J.;
Gaztanaga, E.;
Goldstein, D. A.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gutierrez, G.;
James, D. J.;
Kuehn, K.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Lahav, O.;
Lima, M.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Miller, C. J.;
Miquel, R.;
Nord, B.;
Ogando, R.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Sanchez, E.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, R. C.;
Sobreira, F.;
Suchyta, E.;
Swanson, M. E. C.;
Tarle, G.;
Tucker, D. L.;
Walker, A. R.;
Wester, W.
Submitted: 2017-01-17
We present the discovery and spectroscopic confirmation with the ESO NTT and
Gemini South telescopes of eight new 6.0 < z < 6.5 quasars with z$_{AB}$ <
21.0. These quasars were photometrically selected without any star-galaxy
morphological criteria from 1533 deg$^{2}$ using SED model fitting to
photometric data from the Dark Energy Survey (g, r, i, z, Y), the VISTA
Hemisphere Survey (J, H, K) and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (W1,
W2). The photometric data was fitted with a grid of quasar model SEDs with
redshift dependent Lyman-{\alpha} forest absorption and a range of intrinsic
reddening as well as a series of low mass cool star models. Candidates were
ranked using on a SED-model based $\chi^{2}$-statistic, which is extendable to
other future imaging surveys (e.g. LSST, Euclid). Our spectral confirmation
success rate is 100% without the need for follow-up photometric observations as
used in other studies of this type. Combined with automatic removal of the main
types of non-astrophysical contaminants the method allows large data sets to be
processed without human intervention and without being over run by spurious
false candidates. We also present a robust parametric redshift estimating
technique that gives comparable accuracy to MgII and CO based redshift
estimators. We find two z $\sim$ 6.2 quasars with HII near zone sizes < 3
proper Mpc which could indicate that these quasars may be young with ages <
10$^6$ - 10$^7$ years or lie in over dense regions of the IGM. The z = 6.5
quasar VDESJ0224-4711 has J$_{AB}$ = 19.75 is the second most luminous quasar
known with z > 6.5.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.00803 [pdf] - 1483418
A Tail of Two Populations: Chemo-dynamics of the Sagittarius Stream and
Implications for its Original Mass
Submitted: 2016-07-04
We use the SDSS/SEGUE spectroscopic sample of stars in the leading and
trailing streams of the Sagittarius (Sgr) to demonstrate the existence of two
sub-populations with distinct chemistry and kinematics. The metallicity
distribution function (MDF) of the trailing stream is decomposed into two
Gaussians describing a metal-rich sub-population with means and dispersions
(-0.74, 0.18) dex and a metal-poor with (-1.33, 0.27) dex. The metal-rich
sub-population has a velocity dispersion ~ 8 km/s, whilst the metal-poor is
nearly twice as hot ~13 km/s. For the leading stream, the MDF is again
well-described by a superposition of two Gaussians, though somewhat shifted as
compared to the trailing stream. The metal-rich has mean and dispersion (-1.00,
0.34) dex, the metal-poor (-1.39, 0.22) dex. The velocity dispersions are
inflated by projection effects to give 15 - 30 km/s for the metal-poor, and 6 -
20 km/s for the metal-rich, depending on longitude. We infer that, like many
dwarf spheroidals, the Sgr progenitor possessed a more extended, metal-poor
stellar component and less extended, metal-rich one. We study the implications
of this result for the progenitor mass by simulating the disruption of the Sgr,
represented as King light profiles in dark halos of masses between $10^{10}$
and $10^{11} M_\odot$, in a three-component Milky Way whose halo is a live
Truncated Flat potential in the first phase of accretion and a triaxial Law \&
Majewski model in the second phase. We show that that the dark halo of the Sgr
must have been $\gtrsim 6 \times 10^{10} M_\odot$ to reproduce the run of
velocity dispersion with longitude for the metal-rich and metal-poor
sub-populations in the tails.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.07720 [pdf] - 1360389
Discy dwarf disruption and the shape of the Galactic halo
Submitted: 2016-01-28, last modified: 2016-02-17
The shape of the Galactic dark halo can, in principle, be inferred through
modelling of stellar tidal streams in the Milky Way halo. The brightest and the
longest of these, the Sagittarius stream, reaches out to large Galactocentric
distances and hence can deliver the tightest constraints on the Galaxy's
potential. In this contribution, we revisit the idea that the Sagittarius
Stream was formed from a rotating progenitor. We demonstrate that the angle
between the disk's angular momentum and the progenitor's orbital angular
momentum does not remain constant throughout the disruption. Instead, it
undergoes a dramatic evolution caused, in part, by the changes in the
progenitor's moment of inertia tensor. We show that, even in a spherical
potential, the streams produced as a result of a disky dwarf disruption appear
to be "precessing". Yet, this debris plane evolution is illusory as it is
solely caused by the swaying and wobbling of the progenitor's disk. Stream
plane precession is therefore not an unambiguous indicator of asphericity of
the dark halo.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.2243 [pdf] - 890868
"Skinny Milky Way, Please", says Sagittarius
Submitted: 2014-06-09, last modified: 2014-09-24
Motivated by recent observations of the Sagittarius stream, we devise a rapid
algorithm to generate faithful representations of the centroids of stellar
tidal streams formed in a disruption of a progenitor of an arbitrary mass in an
arbitrary potential. Our method works by releasing swarms of test particles at
the Lagrange points around the satellite and subsequently evolving them in a
combined potential of the host and the progenitor. We stress that the action of
the progenitor's gravity is crucial to making streams that look almost
indistinguishable from the N-body realizations, as indeed ours do. The method
is tested on mock stream data in three different Milky Way potentials with
increasing complexity, and is shown to deliver unbiased inference on the
Galactic mass distribution out to large radii. When applied to the observations
of the Sagittarius stream, our model gives a natural explanation of the
stream's apocentric distances and the differential orbital precession. We,
therefore, provide a new independent measurement of the Galactic mass
distribution beyond 50 kpc. The Sagittarius stream model favours a light Milky
Way with the mass 4.1 +/- 0.4 x 10^11 M_sun at 100 kpc, which can be
extrapolated to 5.6 +/- 1.2 x 10^11 M_sun at 200 kpc. Such a low mass for the
Milky Way Galaxy is in good agreement with estimates from the kinematics of
halo stars and from the satellite galaxies (once Leo I is removed from the
sample). It entirely removes the "Too Big To Fail Problem".