Normalized to: Ghelfi, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1511.08650 [pdf] - 1579764
Non-parametric determination of H and He interstellar fluxes from
cosmic-ray data
Submitted: 2015-11-27, last modified: 2017-06-28
Top-of-atmosphere (TOA) cosmic-ray (CR) fluxes from satellites and
balloon-borne experiments are snapshots of the solar activity imprinted on the
interstellar (IS) fluxes. Given a series of snapshots, the unknown IS flux
shape and the level of modulation (for each snapshot) can be recovered. We wish
(i) to provide the most accurate determination of the IS H and He fluxes from
TOA data alone, (ii) to obtain the associated modulation levels (and
uncertainties) while fully accounting for the correlations with the IS flux
uncertainties, and (iii) to inspect whether the minimal force-field
approximation is sufficient to explain all the data at hand. Using H and He TOA
measurements, including the recent high-precision AMS, BESS-Polar, and PAMELA
data, we performed a non-parametric fit of the IS fluxes $J^{\rm IS}_{\rm
H,~He}$ and modulation level $\phi_i$ for each data-taking period. We relied on
a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) engine to extract the probability density
function and correlations (hence the credible intervals) of the sought
parameters. Although H and He are the most abundant and best measured CR
species, several datasets had to be excluded from the analysis because of
inconsistencies with other measurements. From the subset of data passing our
consistency cut, we provide ready-to-use best-fit and credible intervals for
the H and He IS fluxes from MeV/n to PeV/n energy (with a relative precision in
the range [2-10\%] at 1$\sigma$). Given the strong correlation between $J^{\rm
IS}$ and $\phi_i$ parameters, the uncertainties on $J^{\rm IS}$ translate into
$\Delta\phi\approx \pm 30$~MV (at 1$\sigma$) for all experiments. We also find
that the presence of $^3$He in He data biases $\phi$ towards higher $\phi$
values by $\sim 30$~MV. The force-field approximation gives an excellent
($\chi^2/$dof$=1.02$) description of the recent high-precision TOA H and He
fluxes.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1607.01976 [pdf] - 1580044
Neutron monitors and muon detectors for solar modulation studies: 2.
$\phi$ time series
Submitted: 2016-07-07
The level of solar modulation at different times (related to the solar
activity) is a central question of solar and galactic cosmic-ray physics. In
the first paper of this series, we have established a correspondence between
the uncertainties on ground-based detectors count rates and the parameter
$\phi$ (modulation level in the force-field approximation) reconstructed from
these count rates. In this second paper, we detail a procedure to obtain a
reference $\phi$ time series from neutron monitor data. We show that we can
have an unbiased and accurate $\phi$ reconstruction ($\Delta\phi/\phi\simeq
10\%$). We also discuss the potential of Bonner spheres spectrometers and muon
detectors to provide $\phi$ time series. Two by-products of this calculation
are updated $\phi$ values for the cosmic-ray database and a web interface to
retrieve and plot $\phi$ from the 50's to today
(\url{http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/crdb}).
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1403.1612 [pdf] - 907341
Neutron monitors and muon detectors for solar modulation studies:
Interstellar flux, yield function, and assessment of critical parameters in
count rate calculations
Submitted: 2014-03-06, last modified: 2014-07-01
Particles count rates at given Earth location and altitude result from the
convolution of (i) the interstellar (IS) cosmic-ray fluxes outside the solar
cavity, (ii) the time-dependent modulation of IS into Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA)
fluxes, (iii) the rigidity cut-off (or geomagnetic transmission function) and
grammage at the counter location, (iv) the atmosphere response to incoming TOA
cosmic rays (shower development), and (v) the counter response to the various
particles/energies in the shower. Count rates from neutron monitors or muon
counters are therefore a proxy to solar activity. In this paper, we review all
ingredients, discuss how their uncertainties impact count rate calculations,
and how they translate into variation/uncertainties on the level of solar
modulation $\varphi$ (in the simple Force-Field approximation). The main
uncertainty for neutron monitors is related to the yield function. However,
many other effects have a significant impact, at the 5-10\% level on $\varphi$
values. We find no clear ranking of the dominant effects, as some depend on the
station position and/or the weather and/or the season. An abacus to translate
any variation of count rates (for neutron and $\mu$ detectors) to a variation
of the solar modulation $\varphi$ is provided.