Normalized to: Geehan, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0710.4582 [pdf] - 6370
Ram pressure stripping of an isolated Local Group dwarf galaxy: evidence
for an intra-group medium
Submitted: 2007-10-24
We compare the stellar structure of the isolated, Local Group dwarf galaxy
Pegasus (DDO216) with low resolution HI maps from Young et al. (2003). Our
comparison reveals that Pegasus displays the characteristic morphology of ram
pressure stripping; in particular, the HI has a ``cometary'' appearance which
is not reflected in the regular, elliptical distribution of the stars. This is
the first time this phenomenon has been observed in an isolated Local Group
galaxy. The density of the medium required to ram pressure strip Pegasus is at
least $10^{-5} - 10^{-6}$, cm$^{-3}$. We conclude that this is strong evidence
for an inter-galactic medium associated with the Local Group.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0501240 [pdf] - 70352
Investigating the Andromeda Stream: I. Simple Analytic Bulge-Disk-Halo
Model for M31
Submitted: 2005-01-12, last modified: 2006-04-10
This paper is the first in a series which studies interactions between M31
and its satellites, including the origin of the giant southern stream. We
construct accurate yet simple analytic models for the potential of the M31
galaxy to provide an easy basis for calculation of orbits in M31's halo. We use
an NFW dark halo, an exponential disk, a Hernquist bulge, and a central black
hole point mass to describe the galaxy potential. We constrain the parameters
of these functions by comparing to existing surface brightness, velocity
dispersion, and rotation curve measurements of M31. Our description provides a
good fit to the observations, and agrees well with more sophisticated modeling
of M31. While in many respects the parameter set is well constrained, there is
substantial uncertainty in the outer halo potential and a near-degeneracy
between the disk and halo components, producing a large, nearly two-dimensional
allowed region in parameter space. We limit the allowed region using
theoretical expectations for the halo concentration, baryonic content, and
stellar $M/L$ ratio, finding a smaller region where the parameters are
physically plausible. Our proposed mass model for M31 has $M_{bulge} = 3.2
\times 10^{10} \Msun$, $M_{disk} = 7.2 \times 10^{10} \Msun$, and $M_{200} =
7.1\times 10^{11} \Msun$, with uncorrected (for internal and foreground
extinction) mass-to-light ratios of $M/L_R = 3.9$ and 3.3 for the bulge and
disk, respectively. We present some illustrative test particle orbits for the
progenitor of the stellar stream in our galaxy potential, highlighting the
effects of the remaining uncertainty in the disk and halo masses.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0501241 [pdf] - 70353
Investigating the Andromeda Stream: II. Orbital Fits and Properties of
the Progenitor
Submitted: 2005-01-12, last modified: 2006-04-10
We construct test-particle orbits and simple N-body models that match the
properties of the giant stellar stream observed to the south of M31, using the
model of M31's potential derived in the companion paper by Geehan et al.
(2006). We introduce a simple approximation to account for the difference in
position between the stream and the orbit of the progenitor; this significantly
affects the best-fitting orbits. The progenitor orbits we derive have orbital
apocenter $\sim 60 \kpc$ and pericenter $\sim 3 \kpc$, though these quantities
vary somewhat with the current orbital phase of the progenitor which is as yet
unknown. Our best combined fit to the stream and galaxy properties implies a
mass within 125 kpc of M31 of $(7.4 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{11} \Msun$. Based on
its length, width, luminosity, and velocity dispersion, we conclude that the
stream originates from a progenitor satellite with mass $M_s \sim 10^9 \Msun$,
and at most modest amounts of dark matter; the estimate of $M_s$ is again
correlated with the phase of the progenitor. M31 displays a large number of
faint features in its inner halo which may be progenitors or continuations of
the stream. While the orbital fits are not constrained enough for us to
conclusively identify the progenitor, we can identify several plausible
candidates, of which a feature in the planetary nebula distribution found by
Merrett et al. is the most plausible, and rule out several others. We make
predictions for the kinematic properties of the successful candidates. These
may aid in observational identification of the progenitor object, which would
greatly constrain the allowed models of the stream.