Normalized to: Gazis, P.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1510.06129 [pdf] - 1678425
Structure in Galaxy Distribution. III. Fourier Transforming the Universe
Submitted: 2015-10-21, last modified: 2017-04-13
We demonstrate the effectiveness of a relatively straightforward analysis of
the complex 3D Fourier transform of galaxy coordinates derived from redshift
surveys. Numerical demonstrations of this approach are carried out on a
volume-limited sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey redshift survey. The
direct unbinned transform yields a complex 3D data cube quite similar to that
from the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of finely binned galaxy positions. In
both cases deconvolution of the sampling window function yields estimates of
the true transform. Simple power spectrum estimates from these transforms are
roughly consistent with those using more elaborate methods. However we
concentrate on the less often studied Fourier phase spectrum, a simple and
general framework for characterizing non-Gaussianity, more easily interpretable
than the tangled, incomplete multi-point methods conventionally used. No
significant signature of non-Gaussianity has been found in the relatively small
data set analyzed, but we identify some threads of modern large scale inference
methodology that will presumably yield detections in new wider and deeper
surveys.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.6111 [pdf] - 1215177
Structure in the 3D Galaxy Distribution: II. Voids and Watersheds of
Local Maxima and Minima
Submitted: 2014-06-23
The major uncertainties in studies of the multi-scale structure of the
Universe arise not from observational errors but from the variety of legitimate
definitions and detection methods for individual structures. To facilitate the
study of these methodological dependencies we have carried out 12 different
analyses defining structures in various ways. This has been done in a purely
geometrical way by utilizing the HOP algorithm as a unique parameter-free
method of assigning groups of galaxies to local density maxima or minima. From
three density estimation techniques (smoothing kernels, Bayesian Blocks and
self organizing maps) applied to three data sets (the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Data Release 7, the Millennium Simulation and randomly distributed points) we
tabulate information that can be used to construct catalogs of structures
connected to local density maxima and minima. The resulting sizes follow
continuous multi-scale distributions with no indication of the presence of a
discrete hierarchy. We also introduce a novel void finder that utilizes a
method to assemble Delaunay tetrahedra into connected structures and
characterizes regions very nearly empty of galaxies in the source catalog.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.0387 [pdf] - 1034642
Structure in the 3D Galaxy Distribution: I. Methods and Example Results
Submitted: 2010-09-02, last modified: 2010-12-02
Three methods for detecting and characterizing structure in point data, such
as that generated by redshift surveys, are described: classification using
self-organizing maps, segmentation using Bayesian blocks, and density
estimation using adaptive kernels. The first two methods are new, and allow
detection and characterization of structures of arbitrary shape and at a wide
range of spatial scales. These methods should elucidate not only clusters, but
also the more distributed, wide-ranging filaments and sheets, and further allow
the possibility of detecting and characterizing an even broader class of
shapes. The methods are demonstrated and compared in application to three data
sets: a carefully selected volume-limited sample from the Sloan Digital Sky
Survey redshift data, a similarly selected sample from the Millennium
Simulation, and a set of points independently drawn from a uniform probability
distribution -- a so-called Poisson distribution. We demonstrate a few of the
many ways in which these methods elucidate large scale structure in the
distribution of galaxies in the nearby Universe.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1008.2205 [pdf] - 1034252
Viewpoints: A high-performance high-dimensional exploratory data
analysis tool
Submitted: 2010-08-12, last modified: 2010-11-08
Scientific data sets continue to increase in both size and complexity. In the
past, dedicated graphics systems at supercomputing centers were required to
visualize large data sets, but as the price of commodity graphics hardware has
dropped and its capability has increased, it is now possible, in principle, to
view large complex data sets on a single workstation. To do this in practice,
an investigator will need software that is written to take advantage of the
relevant graphics hardware. The Viewpoints visualization package described
herein is an example of such software. Viewpoints is an interactive tool for
exploratory visual analysis of large, high-dimensional (multivariate) data. It
leverages the capabilities of modern graphics boards (GPUs) to run on a single
workstation or laptop. Viewpoints is minimalist: it attempts to do a small set
of useful things very well (or at least very quickly) in comparison with
similar packages today. Its basic feature set includes linked scatter plots
with brushing, dynamic histograms, normalization and outlier detection/removal.
Viewpoints was originally designed for astrophysicists, but it has since been
used in a variety of fields that range from astronomy, quantum chemistry, fluid
dynamics, machine learning, bioinformatics, and finance to information
technology server log mining. In this article, we describe the Viewpoints
package and show examples of its usage.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0268 [pdf] - 1018957
Kepler Mission Design, Realized Photometric Performance, and Early
Science
Koch, David G.;
Borucki, William J.;
Basri, Gibor;
Batalha, Natalie M.;
Brown, Timothy M.;
Caldwell, Douglas;
Christensen-Dalsgaard, Joergen;
Cochran, William D.;
DeVore, Edna;
Dunham, Edward W.;
Gautier, Thomas N.;
Geary, John C.;
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Gould, Alan;
Jenkins, Jon;
Kondo, Yoji;
Latham, David W.;
Lissauer, Jack J.;
Marcy, Geoffrey;
Monet, David;
Sasselov, Dimitar;
Boss, Alan;
Brownlee, Donald;
Caldwell, John;
Dupree, Andrea K.;
Howell, Steve B.;
Kjeldsen, Hans;
Meibom, Soeren;
Morrison, David;
Owen, Tobias;
Reitsema, Harold;
Tarter, Jill;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Dotson, Jessie L.;
Gazis, Paul;
Haas, Michael R.;
Kolodziejczak, Jeffrey;
Rowe, Jason F.;
Van Cleve, Jeffrey E.;
Allen, Christopher;
Chandrasekaran, Hema;
Clarke, Bruce D.;
Li, Jie;
Quintana, Elisa V.;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Twicken, Joseph D.;
Wu, Hayley
Submitted: 2010-01-01, last modified: 2010-01-26
The Kepler Mission, launched on Mar 6, 2009 was designed with the explicit
capability to detect Earth-size planets in the habitable zone of solar-like
stars using the transit photometry method. Results from just forty-three days
of data along with ground-based follow-up observations have identified five new
transiting planets with measurements of their masses, radii, and orbital
periods. Many aspects of stellar astrophysics also benefit from the unique,
precise, extended and nearly continuous data set for a large number and variety
of stars. Early results for classical variables and eclipsing stars show great
promise. To fully understand the methodology, processes and eventually the
results from the mission, we present the underlying rationale that ultimately
led to the flight and ground system designs used to achieve the exquisite
photometric performance. As an example of the initial photometric results, we
present variability measurements that can be used to distinguish dwarf stars
from red giants.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1001.0216 [pdf] - 1018950
Instrument Performance in Kepler's First Months
Caldwell, Douglas A.;
Kolodziejczak, Jeffery J.;
Van Cleve, Jeffrey E.;
Jenkins, Jon M.;
Gazis, Paul R.;
Argabright, Vic S.;
Bachtell, Eric E.;
Dunham, Edward W.;
Geary, John C.;
Gilliland, Ronald L.;
Chandrasekaran, Hema;
Li, Jie;
Tenenbaum, Peter;
Wu, Hayley;
Borucki, William J.;
Bryson, Stephen T.;
Dotson, Jessie L.;
Haas, Michael R.;
Koch, David G.
Submitted: 2010-01-01
The Kepler Mission relies on precise differential photometry to detect the 80
parts per million (ppm) signal from an Earth-Sun equivalent transit. Such
precision requires superb instrument stability on time scales up to ~2 days and
systematic error removal to better than 20 ppm. To this end, the spacecraft and
photometer underwent 67 days of commissioning, which included several data sets
taken to characterize the photometer performance. Because Kepler has no
shutter, we took a series of dark images prior to the dust cover ejection, from
which we measured the bias levels, dark current, and read noise. These basic
detector properties are essentially unchanged from ground-based tests,
indicating that the photometer is working as expected. Several image artifacts
have proven more complex than when observed during ground testing, as a result
of their interactions with starlight and the greater thermal stability in
flight, which causes the temperature-dependent artifact variations to be on the
timescales of transits. Because of Kepler's unprecedented sensitivity and
stability, we have also seen several unexpected systematics that affect
photometric precision. We are using the first 43 days of science data to
characterize these effects and to develop detection and mitigation methods that
will be implemented in the calibration pipeline. Based on early testing, we
expect to attain Kepler's planned photometric precision over 80%-90% of the
field of view.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.4081 [pdf] - 24619
New Approaches To Photometric Redshift Prediction Via Gaussian Process
Regression In The Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Submitted: 2009-05-25, last modified: 2009-10-26
Expanding upon the work of Way and Srivastava 2006 we demonstrate how the use
of training sets of comparable size continue to make Gaussian process
regression (GPR) a competitive approach to that of neural networks and other
least-squares fitting methods. This is possible via new large size matrix
inversion techniques developed for Gaussian processes (GPs) that do not require
that the kernel matrix be sparse. This development, combined with a
neural-network kernel function appears to give superior results for this
problem. Our best fit results for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Main
Galaxy Sample using u,g,r,i,z filters gives an rms error of 0.0201 while our
results for the same filters in the luminous red galaxy sample yield 0.0220. We
also demonstrate that there appears to be a minimum number of training-set
galaxies needed to obtain the optimal fit when using our GPR rank-reduction
methods. We find that morphological information included with many photometric
surveys appears, for the most part, to make the photometric redshift evaluation
slightly worse rather than better. This would indicate that most morphological
information simply adds noise from the GP point of view in the data used
herein. In addition, we show that cross-match catalog results involving
combinations of the Two Micron All Sky Survey, SDSS, and Galaxy Evolution
Explorer have to be evaluated in the context of the resulting cross-match
magnitude and redshift distribution. Otherwise one may be misled into overly
optimistic conclusions.