Normalized to: Gavagnin, E.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.07982 [pdf] - 1581296
Star Cluster Formation in a Turbulent Molecular Cloud Self-Regulated by
Photo-Ionisation Feedback
Submitted: 2017-01-27, last modified: 2017-10-20
Most stars in the Galaxy are believed to be formed within star clusters from
collapsing molecular clouds. However, the complete process of star formation,
from the parent cloud to a gas-free star cluster, is still poorly understood.
We perform radiation-hydrodynamical simulations of the collapse of a turbulent
molecular cloud using the RAMSES-RT code. Stars are modelled using sink
particles, from which we self-consistently follow the propagation of the
ionising radiation. We study how different feedback models affect the gas
expulsion from the cloud and how they shape the final properties of the
emerging star cluster. We find that the star formation efficiency is lower for
stronger feedback models. Feedback also changes the high mass end of the
stellar mass function. Stronger feedback also allows the establishment of a
lower density star cluster, which can maintain a virial or sub-virial state. In
the absence of feedback, the star formation efficiency is very high, as well as
the final stellar density. As a result, high energy close encounters make the
cluster evaporate quickly. Other indicators, such as mass segregation,
statistics of multiple systems and escaping stars confirm this picture.
Observations of young star clusters are in best agreement with our strong
feedback simulation.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1606.02743 [pdf] - 1447796
A critical look at the merger scenario to explain multiple populations
and rotation in iron-complex globular clusters
Submitted: 2016-06-08
Merging has been proposed to explain multiple populations in globular
clusters (GCs) where there is a spread in iron abundance (hereafter,
iron-complex GCs). By means of N-body simulations, we investigate if merging is
consistent with the observations of sub-populations and rotation in
iron-complex GCs. The key parameters are the initial mass and density ratios of
the progenitors. When densities are similar, the more massive progenitor
dominates the central part of the merger remnant and the less massive
progenitor forms an extended rotating population. The low-mass progenitor can
become the majority population in the central regions of the merger remnant
only if its initial density is higher by roughly the mass ratio. To match the
radial distribution of multiple populations in two iron-complex GCs ({\omega}
Cen and NGC 1851), the less massive progenitor needs to be four times as dense
as the larger one. Our merger remnants show solid-body rotation in the inner
parts, becoming differential in the outer parts. Rotation velocity V and
ellipticity {\epsilon} are in agreement with models for oblate rotators with
isotropic dispersion. We discuss several kinematic signatures of a merger with
a denser lower mass progenitor that can be tested with future observations.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.02484 [pdf] - 1095674
The Gaia-ESO Survey: N-body modelling of the Gamma Velorum cluster
Mapelli, M.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jeffries, R. D.;
Gavagnin, E.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Sacco, G. G.;
Meyer, M. R.;
Alfaro, E. J.;
Costado, M.;
Damiani, F.;
Frasca, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Randich, S.;
Sordo, R.;
Zaggia, S.;
Micela, G.;
Flaccomio, E.;
Pancino, E.;
Bergemann, M.;
Hourihane, A.;
Lardo, C.;
Magrini, L.;
Morbidelli, L.;
Prisinzano, L.;
Worley, C. C.
Submitted: 2015-04-09, last modified: 2015-05-02
The Gaia-ESO Survey has recently unveiled the complex kinematic signature of
the Gamma Velorum cluster: this cluster is composed of two kinematically
distinct populations (hereafter, population A and B), showing two different
velocity dispersions and a relative ~2 km s^-1 radial velocity (RV) shift. In
this paper, we propose that the two populations of the Gamma Velorum cluster
originate from two different sub-clusters, born from the same parent molecular
cloud. We investigate this possibility by means of direct-summation N-body
simulations. Our scenario is able to reproduce not only the RV shift and the
different velocity dispersions, but also the different centroid (~0.5 pc), the
different spatial concentration and the different line-of-sight distance (~5
pc) of the two populations. The observed 1-2 Myr age difference between the two
populations is also naturally explained by our scenario, in which the two
sub-clusters formed in two slightly different star formation episodes. Our
simulations suggest that population B is strongly supervirial, while population
A is close to virial equilibrium. We discuss the implications of our models for
the formation of young star clusters and OB associations in the Milky Way.