Normalized to: Gaspar, M.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1108.1598 [pdf] - 395855
Characterization of the Virgo Seismic Environment
The Virgo Collaboration;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Astone, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Barone, F.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Basti, A.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Bebronne, M.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belletoile, A.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blom, M.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bosi, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Branchesi, M.;
Briant, T.;
Brillet, A.;
Brisson, V.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Calloni, E.;
Canuel, B.;
Carbognani, F.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chincarini, A.;
Chiummo, A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Cohadon, P. -F.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Conte, A.;
Coughlin, M.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Cuoco, E.;
DAntonio, S.;
Dattilo, V.;
Davier, M.;
Day, R.;
De Rosa, R.;
Debreczeni, G.;
Del Pozzo, W.;
del Prete, M.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Emilio, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dietz, A.;
Drago, M.;
Endroczi, G.;
Fafone, V.;
Ferrante, I.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Forte, L. A.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaspar, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gouaty, R.;
Granata, M.;
Greverie, C.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Hayau, J. -F.;
Heidmann, A.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Kowalska, I.;
Krolak, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Liguori, N.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Losurdo, G.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Masserot, A.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mohan, M.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mosca, S.;
Mours, B.;
Naticchioni, L.;
Nocera, F.;
Pagliaroli, G.;
Palladino, L.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Parisi, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Persichetti, G.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pietka, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Poggiani, R.;
Prato, M.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Re, V.;
Regimbau, T.;
Ricci, F.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Romano, R.;
Rosinska, D.;
Ruggi, P.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sperandio, L.;
Sturani, R.;
Swinkels, B.;
Tacca, M.;
Taffarello, L.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travasso, F.;
Vajente, G.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
Broeck, C. Van Den;
van der Putten, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vavoulidis, M.;
Vedovato, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vitale, S.;
Vocca, H.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Yvert, M.;
Zadrozny, A.;
Zendri, J. -P.
Submitted: 2011-08-07
The Virgo gravitational wave detector is an interferometer (ITF) with 3km
arms located in Pisa, Italy. From July to October 2010, Virgo performed its
third science run (VSR3) in coincidence with the LIGO detectors. Despite
several techniques adopted to isolate the interferometer from the environment,
seismic noise remains an important issue for Virgo. Vibrations produced by the
detector infrastructure (such as air conditioning units, water
chillers/heaters, pumps) are found to affect Virgo's sensitivity, with the main
coupling mechanisms being through beam jitter and scattered light processes.
The Advanced Virgo (AdV) design seeks to reduce ITF couplings to environmental
noise by having most vibration-sensitive components suspended and in-vacuum, as
well as muffle and relocate loud machines. During the months of June and July
2010, a Guralp-3TD seismometer was stationed at various locations around the
Virgo site hosting major infrastructure machines. Seismic data were examined
using spectral and coherence analysis with seismic probes close to the
detector. The primary aim of this study was to identify noisy machines which
seismically affect the ITF environment and thus require mitigation attention.
Analyzed machines are located at various distances from the experimental halls,
ranging from 10m to 100m. An attempt is made to measure the attenuation of
emitted noise at the ITF and correlate it to the distance from the source and
to seismic attenuation models in soil.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1009.5190 [pdf] - 328806
Calibration and sensitivity of the Virgo detector during its second
science run
The Virgo Collaboration;
Accadia, T.;
Acernese, F.;
Antonucci, F.;
Astone, P.;
Ballardin, G.;
Barone, F.;
Barsuglia, M.;
Basti, A.;
Bauer, Th. S.;
Beker, M. G.;
Belletoile, A.;
Birindelli, S.;
Bitossi, M.;
Bizouard, M. A.;
Blom, M.;
Bondu, F.;
Bonelli, L.;
Bonnand, R.;
Boschi, V.;
Bosi, L.;
Bouhou, B.;
Braccini, S.;
Bradaschia, C.;
Brillet, A.;
Brisson, V.;
Budzynski, R.;
Bulik, T.;
Bulten, H. J.;
Buskulic, D.;
Buy, C.;
Cagnoli, G.;
Calloni, E.;
Campagna, E.;
Canuel, B.;
Carbognani, F.;
Cavalier, F.;
Cavalieri, R.;
Cella, G.;
Cesarini, E.;
Chaibi, O.;
Chassande-Mottin, E.;
Chincarini, A.;
Cleva, F.;
Coccia, E.;
Colacino, C. N.;
Colas, J.;
Colla, A.;
Colombini, M.;
Corsi, A.;
Coulon, J. -P.;
Cuoco, E.;
D'Antonio, S.;
Dattilo, V.;
Davier, M.;
Day, R.;
De Rosa, R.;
Debreczeni, G.;
del Prete, M.;
Di Fiore, L.;
Di Lieto, A.;
Emilio, M. Di Paolo;
Di Virgilio, A.;
Dietz, A.;
Drago, M.;
Fafone, V.;
Ferrante, I.;
Fidecaro, F.;
Fiori, I.;
Flaminio, R.;
Forte, L. A.;
Fournier, J. -D.;
Franc, J.;
Frasca, S.;
Frasconi, F.;
Freise, A.;
Galimberti, M.;
Gammaitoni, L.;
Garufi, F.;
Gaspar, M. E.;
Gemme, G.;
Genin, E.;
Gennai, A.;
Giazotto, A.;
Gouaty, R.;
Granata, M.;
Greverie, C.;
Guidi, G. M.;
Hayau, J. -F.;
Heitmann, H.;
Hello, P.;
Hild, S.;
Huet, D.;
Jaranowski, P.;
Kowalska, I.;
Krolak, A.;
Leroy, N.;
Letendre, N.;
Li, T. G. F.;
Liguori, N.;
Lorenzini, M.;
Loriette, V.;
Losurdo, G.;
Majorana, E.;
Maksimovic, I.;
Man, N.;
Mantovani, M.;
Marchesoni, F.;
Marion, F.;
Marque, J.;
Martelli, F.;
Masserot, A.;
Michel, C.;
Milano, L.;
Minenkov, Y.;
Mohan, M.;
Morgado, N.;
Morgia, A.;
Mosca, S.;
Moscatelli, V.;
Mours, B.;
Neri, I.;
Nocera, F.;
Pagliaroli, G.;
Palladino, L.;
Palomba, C.;
Paoletti, F.;
Pardi, S.;
Parisi, M.;
Pasqualetti, A.;
Passaquieti, R.;
Passuello, D.;
Persichetti, G.;
Pichot, M.;
Piergiovanni, F.;
Pietka, M.;
Pinard, L.;
Poggiani, R.;
Prato, M.;
Prodi, G. A.;
Punturo, M.;
Puppo, P.;
Rabeling, D. S.;
Racz, I.;
Rapagnani, P.;
Re, V.;
Regimbau, T.;
Ricci, F.;
Robinet, F.;
Rocchi, A.;
Rolland, L.;
Romano, R.;
Rosinska, D.;
Ruggi, P.;
Sassolas, B.;
Sentenac, D.;
Sperandio, L.;
Sturani, R.;
Swinkels, B.;
Toncelli, A.;
Tonelli, M.;
Torre, O.;
Tournefier, E.;
Travasso, F.;
Vajente, G.;
Brand, J. F. J. van den;
van der Putten, S.;
Vasuth, M.;
Vavoulidis, M.;
Vedovato, G.;
Verkindt, D.;
Vetrano, F.;
Vicere, A.;
Vinet, J. -Y.;
Vocca, H.;
Ward, R. L.;
Was, M.;
Yvert, M.
Submitted: 2010-09-27, last modified: 2011-01-18
The Virgo detector is a kilometer-length interferometer for gravitational
wave detection located near Pisa (Italy). During its second science run (VSR2)
in 2009, six months of data were accumulated with a sensitivity close to its
design. In this paper, the methods used to determine the parameters for
sensitivity estimation and gravitational wave reconstruction are described. The
main quantities to be calibrated are the frequency response of the mirror
actuation and the sensing of the output power. Focus is also put on their
absolute timing. The monitoring of the calibration data as well as the
parameter estimation with independent techniques are discussed to provide an
estimation of the calibration uncertainties. Finally, the estimation of the
Virgo sensitivity in the frequency-domain is described and typical
sensitivities measured during VSR2 are shown.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0603441 [pdf] - 80650
Detection Rate Estimates of Gravity-waves Emitted During Parabolic
Encounters of Stellar Black Holes in Globular Clusters
Submitted: 2006-03-17, last modified: 2006-05-08
The rapid advance of gravitational-wave (GW) detector facilities makes it
very important to estimate the event rates of possible detection candidates. We
consider an additional possibility of GW bursts produced during parabolic
encounters (PEs) of stellar mass compact objects. We estimate the rate of
successful detections for specific detectors: the initial Laser Interferometric
Gravitational-Wave Observatory (InLIGO), the French-Italian gravitational-wave
antenna VIRGO, the near-future Advanced-LIGO (AdLIGO), the space-based Laser
Interferometric Space Antenna (LISA), and the Next Generation LISA (NGLISA).
Simple GC models are constructed to account for the compact object mass
function, mass segregation, number density distribution, and velocity
distribution. We calculate encounters both classically and account for general
relativistic corrections by extrapolating the results for infinite mass ratios.
We also include the cosmological redshift of waveforms and event rates. We find
that typical PEs with masses m_1=m_2=40 Msun are detectable with matched
filtering over a signal to noise ratio of 5 within a distance d_L~200Mpc for
InLIGO and VIRGO, z=1 for AdLIGO, 0.4Mpc for LISA, and 1Gpc for NGLISA. We
estimate single datastream total detection rates of 5.5 x 10^{-5} for InLIGO,
7.2 x 10^{-5} for VIRGO, 0.063 for AdLIGO, 2.9 x 10^{-6} for LISA, and 1.0 for
NGLISA per year, for reasonably conservative assumptions. These estimates are
subject to uncertainties in the GC parameters, most importantly the total
number and mass-distribution of black holes (BHs) in the cluster core. In
reasonably optimistic cases, we get >~1 detections for AdLIGO per year. The
regular detection of GWs during PEs would provide a unique observational probe
for constraining the stellar BH mass function of dense clusters. (abridged)