Normalized to: Gaskins, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1709.07997 [pdf] - 1838112
Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array
Consortium, The Cherenkov Telescope Array;
:;
Acharya, B. S.;
Agudo, I.;
Samarai, I. Al;
Alfaro, R.;
Alfaro, J.;
Alispach, C.;
Batista, R. Alves;
Amans, J. -P.;
Amato, E.;
Ambrosi, G.;
Antolini, E.;
Antonelli, L. A.;
Aramo, C.;
Araya, M.;
Armstrong, T.;
Arqueros, F.;
Arrabito, L.;
Asano, K.;
Ashley, M.;
Backes, M.;
Balazs, C.;
Balbo, M.;
Ballester, O.;
Ballet, J.;
Bamba, A.;
Barkov, M.;
de Almeida, U. Barres;
Barrio, J. A.;
Bastieri, D.;
Becherini, Y.;
Belfiore, A.;
Benbow, W.;
Berge, D.;
Bernardini, E.;
Bernardini, M. G.;
Bernardos, M.;
Bernlöhr, K.;
Bertucci, B.;
Biasuzzi, B.;
Bigongiari, C.;
Biland, A.;
Bissaldi, E.;
Biteau, J.;
Blanch, O.;
Blazek, J.;
Boisson, C.;
Bolmont, J.;
Bonanno, G.;
Bonardi, A.;
Bonavolontà, C.;
Bonnoli, G.;
Bosnjak, Z.;
Böttcher, M.;
Braiding, C.;
Bregeon, J.;
Brill, A.;
Brown, A. M.;
Brun, P.;
Brunetti, G.;
Buanes, T.;
Buckley, J.;
Bugaev, V.;
Bühler, R.;
Bulgarelli, A.;
Bulik, T.;
Burton, M.;
Burtovoi, A.;
Busetto, G.;
Canestrari, R.;
Capalbi, M.;
Capitanio, F.;
Caproni, A.;
Caraveo, P.;
Cárdenas, V.;
Carlile, C.;
Carosi, R.;
Carquín, E.;
Carr, J.;
Casanova, S.;
Cascone, E.;
Catalani, F.;
Catalano, O.;
Cauz, D.;
Cerruti, M.;
Chadwick, P.;
Chaty, S.;
Chaves, R. C. G.;
Chen, A.;
Chen, X.;
Chernyakova, M.;
Chikawa, M.;
Christov, A.;
Chudoba, J.;
Cieślar, M.;
Coco, V.;
Colafrancesco, S.;
Colin, P.;
Conforti, V.;
Connaughton, V.;
Conrad, J.;
Contreras, J. L.;
Cortina, J.;
Costa, A.;
Costantini, H.;
Cotter, G.;
Covino, S.;
Crocker, R.;
Cuadra, J.;
Cuevas, O.;
Cumani, P.;
D'Aì, A.;
D'Ammando, F.;
D'Avanzo, P.;
D'Urso, D.;
Daniel, M.;
Davids, I.;
Dawson, B.;
Dazzi, F.;
De Angelis, A.;
Anjos, R. de Cássia dos;
De Cesare, G.;
De Franco, A.;
Pino, E. M. de Gouveia Dal;
de la Calle, I.;
Lopez, R. de los Reyes;
De Lotto, B.;
De Luca, A.;
De Lucia, M.;
de Naurois, M.;
Wilhelmi, E. de Oña;
De Palma, F.;
De Persio, F.;
de Souza, V.;
Deil, C.;
Del Santo, M.;
Delgado, C.;
della Volpe, D.;
Di Girolamo, T.;
Di Pierro, F.;
Di Venere, L.;
Díaz, C.;
Dib, C.;
Diebold, S.;
Djannati-Ataï, A.;
Domínguez, A.;
Prester, D. Dominis;
Dorner, D.;
Doro, M.;
Drass, H.;
Dravins, D.;
Dubus, G.;
Dwarkadas, V. V.;
Ebr, J.;
Eckner, C.;
Egberts, K.;
Einecke, S.;
Ekoume, T. R. N.;
Elsässer, D.;
Ernenwein, J. -P.;
Espinoza, C.;
Evoli, C.;
Fairbairn, M.;
Falceta-Goncalves, D.;
Falcone, A.;
Farnier, C.;
Fasola, G.;
Fedorova, E.;
Fegan, S.;
Fernandez-Alonso, M.;
Fernández-Barral, A.;
Ferrand, G.;
Fesquet, M.;
Filipovic, M.;
Fioretti, V.;
Fontaine, G.;
Fornasa, M.;
Fortson, L.;
Coromina, L. Freixas;
Fruck, C.;
Fujita, Y.;
Fukazawa, Y.;
Funk, S.;
Füßling, M.;
Gabici, S.;
Gadola, A.;
Gallant, Y.;
Garcia, B.;
López, R. Garcia;
Garczarczyk, M.;
Gaskins, J.;
Gasparetto, T.;
Gaug, M.;
Gerard, L.;
Giavitto, G.;
Giglietto, N.;
Giommi, P.;
Giordano, F.;
Giro, E.;
Giroletti, M.;
Giuliani, A.;
Glicenstein, J. -F.;
Gnatyk, R.;
Godinovic, N.;
Goldoni, P.;
Gómez-Vargas, G.;
González, M. M.;
González, J. M.;
Götz, D.;
Graham, J.;
Grandi, P.;
Granot, J.;
Green, A. J.;
Greenshaw, T.;
Griffiths, S.;
Gunji, S.;
Hadasch, D.;
Hara, S.;
Hardcastle, M. J.;
Hassan, T.;
Hayashi, K.;
Hayashida, M.;
Heller, M.;
Helo, J. C.;
Hermann, G.;
Hinton, J.;
Hnatyk, B.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holder, J.;
Horan, D.;
Hörandel, J.;
Horns, D.;
Horvath, P.;
Hovatta, T.;
Hrabovsky, M.;
Hrupec, D.;
Humensky, T. B.;
Hütten, M.;
Iarlori, M.;
Inada, T.;
Inome, Y.;
Inoue, S.;
Inoue, T.;
Inoue, Y.;
Iocco, F.;
Ioka, K.;
Iori, M.;
Ishio, K.;
Iwamura, Y.;
Jamrozy, M.;
Janecek, P.;
Jankowsky, D.;
Jean, P.;
Jung-Richardt, I.;
Jurysek, J.;
Kaaret, P.;
Karkar, S.;
Katagiri, H.;
Katz, U.;
Kawanaka, N.;
Kazanas, D.;
Khélifi, B.;
Kieda, D. B.;
Kimeswenger, S.;
Kimura, S.;
Kisaka, S.;
Knapp, J.;
Knödlseder, J.;
Koch, B.;
Kohri, K.;
Komin, N.;
Kosack, K.;
Kraus, M.;
Krause, M.;
Krauß, F.;
Kubo, H.;
Mezek, G. Kukec;
Kuroda, H.;
Kushida, J.;
La Palombara, N.;
Lamanna, G.;
Lang, R. G.;
Lapington, J.;
Blanc, O. Le;
Leach, S.;
Lees, J. -P.;
Lefaucheur, J.;
de Oliveira, M. A. Leigui;
Lenain, J. -P.;
Lico, R.;
Limon, M.;
Lindfors, E.;
Lohse, T.;
Lombardi, S.;
Longo, F.;
López, M.;
López-Coto, R.;
Lu, C. -C.;
Lucarelli, F.;
Luque-Escamilla, P. L.;
Lyard, E.;
Maccarone, M. C.;
Maier, G.;
Majumdar, P.;
Malaguti, G.;
Mandat, D.;
Maneva, G.;
Manganaro, M.;
Mangano, S.;
Marcowith, A.;
Marín, J.;
Markoff, S.;
Martí, J.;
Martin, P.;
Martínez, M.;
Martínez, G.;
Masetti, N.;
Masuda, S.;
Maurin, G.;
Maxted, N.;
Mazin, D.;
Medina, C.;
Melandri, A.;
Mereghetti, S.;
Meyer, M.;
Minaya, I. A.;
Mirabal, N.;
Mirzoyan, R.;
Mitchell, A.;
Mizuno, T.;
Moderski, R.;
Mohammed, M.;
Mohrmann, L.;
Montaruli, T.;
Moralejo, A.;
Morcuende-Parrilla, D.;
Mori, K.;
Morlino, G.;
Morris, P.;
Morselli, A.;
Moulin, E.;
Mukherjee, R.;
Mundell, C.;
Murach, T.;
Muraishi, H.;
Murase, K.;
Nagai, A.;
Nagataki, S.;
Nagayoshi, T.;
Naito, T.;
Nakamori, T.;
Nakamura, Y.;
Niemiec, J.;
Nieto, D.;
Nikołajuk, M.;
Nishijima, K.;
Noda, K.;
Nosek, D.;
Novosyadlyj, B.;
Nozaki, S.;
O'Brien, P.;
Oakes, L.;
Ohira, Y.;
Ohishi, M.;
Ohm, S.;
Okazaki, N.;
Okumura, A.;
Ong, R. A.;
Orienti, M.;
Orito, R.;
Osborne, J. P.;
Ostrowski, M.;
Otte, N.;
Oya, I.;
Padovani, M.;
Paizis, A.;
Palatiello, M.;
Palatka, M.;
Paoletti, R.;
Paredes, J. M.;
Pareschi, G.;
Parsons, R. D.;
Pe'er, A.;
Pech, M.;
Pedaletti, G.;
Perri, M.;
Persic, M.;
Petrashyk, A.;
Petrucci, P.;
Petruk, O.;
Peyaud, B.;
Pfeifer, M.;
Piano, G.;
Pisarski, A.;
Pita, S.;
Pohl, M.;
Polo, M.;
Pozo, D.;
Prandini, E.;
Prast, J.;
Principe, G.;
Prokhorov, D.;
Prokoph, H.;
Prouza, M.;
Pühlhofer, G.;
Punch, M.;
Pürckhauer, S.;
Queiroz, F.;
Quirrenbach, A.;
Rainò, S.;
Razzaque, S.;
Reimer, O.;
Reimer, A.;
Reisenegger, A.;
Renaud, M.;
Rezaeian, A. H.;
Rhode, W.;
Ribeiro, D.;
Ribó, M.;
Richtler, T.;
Rico, J.;
Rieger, F.;
Riquelme, M.;
Rivoire, S.;
Rizi, V.;
Rodriguez, J.;
Fernandez, G. Rodriguez;
Vázquez, J. J. Rodríguez;
Rojas, G.;
Romano, P.;
Romeo, G.;
Rosado, J.;
Rovero, A. C.;
Rowell, G.;
Rudak, B.;
Rugliancich, A.;
Rulten, C.;
Sadeh, I.;
Safi-Harb, S.;
Saito, T.;
Sakaki, N.;
Sakurai, S.;
Salina, G.;
Sánchez-Conde, M.;
Sandaker, H.;
Sandoval, A.;
Sangiorgi, P.;
Sanguillon, M.;
Sano, H.;
Santander, M.;
Sarkar, S.;
Satalecka, K.;
Saturni, F. G.;
Schioppa, E. J.;
Schlenstedt, S.;
Schneider, M.;
Schoorlemmer, H.;
Schovanek, P.;
Schulz, A.;
Schussler, F.;
Schwanke, U.;
Sciacca, E.;
Scuderi, S.;
Seitenzahl, I.;
Semikoz, D.;
Sergijenko, O.;
Servillat, M.;
Shalchi, A.;
Shellard, R. C.;
Sidoli, L.;
Siejkowski, H.;
Sillanpää, A.;
Sironi, G.;
Sitarek, J.;
Sliusar, V.;
Slowikowska, A.;
Sol, H.;
Stamerra, A.;
Stanič, S.;
Starling, R.;
Stawarz, Ł.;
Stefanik, S.;
Stephan, M.;
Stolarczyk, T.;
Stratta, G.;
Straumann, U.;
Suomijarvi, T.;
Supanitsky, A. D.;
Tagliaferri, G.;
Tajima, H.;
Tavani, M.;
Tavecchio, F.;
Tavernet, J. -P.;
Tayabaly, K.;
Tejedor, L. A.;
Temnikov, P.;
Terada, Y.;
Terrier, R.;
Terzic, T.;
Teshima, M.;
Testa, V.;
Thoudam, S.;
Tian, W.;
Tibaldo, L.;
Tluczykont, M.;
Peixoto, C. J. Todero;
Tokanai, F.;
Tomastik, J.;
Tonev, D.;
Tornikoski, M.;
Torres, D. F.;
Torresi, E.;
Tosti, G.;
Tothill, N.;
Tovmassian, G.;
Travnicek, P.;
Trichard, C.;
Trifoglio, M.;
Pujadas, I. Troyano;
Tsujimoto, S.;
Umana, G.;
Vagelli, V.;
Vagnetti, F.;
Valentino, M.;
Vallania, P.;
Valore, L.;
van Eldik, C.;
Vandenbroucke, J.;
Varner, G. S.;
Vasileiadis, G.;
Vassiliev, V.;
Acosta, M. Vázquez;
Vecchi, M.;
Vega, A.;
Vercellone, S.;
Veres, P.;
Vergani, S.;
Verzi, V.;
Vettolani, G. P.;
Viana, A.;
Vigorito, C.;
Villanueva, J.;
Voelk, H.;
Vollhardt, A.;
Vorobiov, S.;
Vrastil, M.;
Vuillaume, T.;
Wagner, S. J.;
Wagner, R.;
Walter, R.;
Ward, J. E.;
Warren, D.;
Watson, J. J.;
Werner, F.;
White, M.;
White, R.;
Wierzcholska, A.;
Wilcox, P.;
Will, M.;
Williams, D. A.;
Wischnewski, R.;
Wood, M.;
Yamamoto, T.;
Yamazaki, R.;
Yanagita, S.;
Yang, L.;
Yoshida, T.;
Yoshiike, S.;
Yoshikoshi, T.;
Zacharias, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Zampieri, L.;
Zandanel, F.;
Zanin, R.;
Zavrtanik, M.;
Zavrtanik, D.;
Zdziarski, A. A.;
Zech, A.;
Zechlin, H.;
Zhdanov, V. I.;
Ziegler, A.;
Zorn, J.
Submitted: 2017-09-22, last modified: 2018-01-21
The Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA, will be the major global observatory for
very high energy gamma-ray astronomy over the next decade and beyond. The
scientific potential of CTA is extremely broad: from understanding the role of
relativistic cosmic particles to the search for dark matter. CTA is an explorer
of the extreme universe, probing environments from the immediate neighbourhood
of black holes to cosmic voids on the largest scales. Covering a huge range in
photon energy from 20 GeV to 300 TeV, CTA will improve on all aspects of
performance with respect to current instruments.
The observatory will operate arrays on sites in both hemispheres to provide
full sky coverage and will hence maximize the potential for the rarest
phenomena such as very nearby supernovae, gamma-ray bursts or gravitational
wave transients. With 99 telescopes on the southern site and 19 telescopes on
the northern site, flexible operation will be possible, with sub-arrays
available for specific tasks. CTA will have important synergies with many of
the new generation of major astronomical and astroparticle observatories.
Multi-wavelength and multi-messenger approaches combining CTA data with those
from other instruments will lead to a deeper understanding of the broad-band
non-thermal properties of target sources.
The CTA Observatory will be operated as an open, proposal-driven observatory,
with all data available on a public archive after a pre-defined proprietary
period. Scientists from institutions worldwide have combined together to form
the CTA Consortium. This Consortium has prepared a proposal for a Core
Programme of highly motivated observations. The programme, encompassing
approximately 40% of the available observing time over the first ten years of
CTA operation, is made up of individual Key Science Projects (KSPs), which are
presented in this document.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1608.07289 [pdf] - 1531360
The angular power spectrum of the diffuse gamma-ray emission as measured
by the Fermi Large Area Telescope and constraints on its Dark Matter
interpretation
Fornasa, Mattia;
Cuoco, Alessandro;
Zavala, Jesus;
Gaskins, Jennifer M.;
Sanchez-Conde, Miguel A.;
Gomez-Vargas, German;
Komatsu, Eiichiro;
Linden, Tim;
Prada, Francisco;
Zandanel, Fabio;
Morselli, Aldo
Submitted: 2016-08-25, last modified: 2016-12-21
The isotropic gamma-ray background arises from the contribution of unresolved
sources, including members of confirmed source classes and proposed gamma-ray
emitters such as the radiation induced by dark matter annihilation and decay.
Clues about the properties of the contributing sources are imprinted in the
anisotropy characteristics of the gamma-ray background. We use 81 months of
Pass 7 Reprocessed data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope to perform a
measurement of the anisotropy angular power spectrum of the gamma-ray
background. We analyze energies between 0.5 and 500 GeV, extending the range
considered in the previous measurement based on 22 months of data. We also
compute, for the first time, the cross-correlation angular power spectrum
between different energy bins. We find that the derived angular spectra are
compatible with being Poissonian, i.e. constant in multipole. Moreover, the
energy dependence of the anisotropy suggests that the signal is due to two
populations of sources, contributing, respectively, below and above 2 GeV.
Finally, using data from state-of-the-art numerical simulations to model the
dark matter distribution, we constrain the contribution from dark matter
annihilation and decay in Galactic and extragalactic structures to the measured
anisotropy. These constraints are competitive with those that can be derived
from the average intensity of the isotropic gamma-ray background. Data are
available at https://www-glast.stanford.edu/pub_data/552.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1605.02016 [pdf] - 1426390
Sensitivity Projections for Dark Matter Searches with the Fermi Large
Area Telescope
Charles, Eric;
Sanchez-Conde, Miguel;
Anderson, Brandon;
Caputo, Regina;
Cuoco, Alessandro;
Di Mauro, Mattia;
Drlica-Wagner, Alex;
Gomez-Vargas, German;
Meyer, Manuel;
Tibaldo, Luigi;
Wood, Matthew;
Zaharijas, Gabrijela;
Zimmer, Stephan;
Ajello, Marco;
Albert, Andrea;
Baldini, Luca;
Bechtol, Keith;
Bloom, Elliott;
Ceraudo, Francesco;
Cohen-Tanugi, Johann;
Digel, Seth;
Gaskins, Jennifer;
Gustafsson, Michael;
Mirabal, Nestor;
Razzano, Massimiliano
Submitted: 2016-05-06, last modified: 2016-05-13
The nature of dark matter is a longstanding enigma of physics; it may consist
of particles beyond the Standard Model that are still elusive to experiments.
Among indirect search techniques, which look for stable products from the
annihilation or decay of dark matter particles, or from axions coupling to
high-energy photons, observations of the $\gamma$-ray sky have come to
prominence over the last few years, because of the excellent sensitivity of the
Large Area Telescope (LAT) on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope mission. The
LAT energy range from 20 MeV to above 300 GeV is particularly well suited for
searching for products of the interactions of dark matter particles. In this
report we describe methods used to search for evidence of dark matter with the
LAT, and review the status of searches performed with up to six years of LAT
data. We also discuss the factors that determine the sensitivities of these
searches, including the magnitudes of the signals and the relevant backgrounds,
considering both statistical and systematic uncertainties. We project the
expected sensitivities of each search method for 10 and 15 years of LAT data
taking. In particular, we find that the sensitivity of searches targeting dwarf
galaxies, which provide the best limits currently, will improve faster than the
square root of observing time. Current LAT limits for dwarf galaxies using six
years of data reach the thermal relic level for masses up to 120 GeV for the
$b\bar{b}$ annihilation channel for reasonable dark matter density profiles.
With projected discoveries of additional dwarfs, these limits could extend to
about 250 GeV. With as much as 15 years of LAT data these searches would be
sensitive to dark matter annihilations at the thermal relic cross section for
masses to greater than 400 GeV (200 GeV) in the $b\bar{b}$ ($\tau^+ \tau^-$)
annihilation channels.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1509.05135 [pdf] - 1398185
Dark matter implications of the WMAP-Planck Haze
Submitted: 2015-09-17, last modified: 2016-04-26
Gamma rays and microwave observations of the Galactic Center and surrounding
areas indicate the presence of anomalous emission, whose origin remains
ambiguous. The possibility of dark matter (DM) annihilation explaining both
signals through prompt emission at gamma-rays and secondary emission at
microwave frequencies from interactions of high-energy electrons produced in
annihilation with the Galactic magnetic fields has attracted much interest in
recent years. We investigate the DM interpretation of the Galactic Center
gamma-ray excess by searching for the associated synchrotron in the WMAP-Planck
data. Considering various magnetic field and cosmic-ray propagation models, we
predict the synchrotron emission due to DM annihilation in our Galaxy, and
compare it with the WMAP-Planck data at 23-70GHz. In addition to standard
microwave foregrounds, we separately model the microwave counterpart to the
Fermi Bubbles and the signal due to DM, and use component separation techniques
to extract the signal associated with each template from the total emission. We
confirm the presence of the Haze at the level of 7% of the total sky intensity
at 23GHz in our chosen region of interest, with a harder spectrum $I \sim
\nu^{-0.8}$ than the synchrotron from regular cosmic-ray electrons. The data do
not show a strong preference towards fitting the Haze by either the Bubbles or
DM emission only. Inclusion of both components provides a better fit with a DM
contribution to the Haze emission of 20% at 23GHz, however, due to significant
uncertainties in foreground modeling, we do not consider this a clear detection
of a DM signal. We set robust upper limits on the annihilation cross section by
ignoring foregrounds, and also report best-fit DM annihilation parameters
obtained from a complete template analysis. We conclude that the WMAP-Planck
data are consistent with a DM interpretation of the gamma-ray excess.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1604.00014 [pdf] - 1521183
A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter
Submitted: 2016-03-31
The indirect detection of dark matter annihilation and decay using
observations of photons, charged cosmic rays, and neutrinos offers a promising
means of identifying the particle nature of this elusive component of the
universe. The last decade has seen substantial advances in observational data
sets, complemented by new insights from numerical simulations, which together
have enabled for the first time strong constraints on dark matter particle
models, and have revealed several intriguing hints of possible signals. This
review provides an introduction to indirect detection methods and an overview
of recent results in the field.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.00965 [pdf] - 1388974
Search for Gamma-ray Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation in the Small
Magellanic Cloud with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
Submitted: 2016-03-02, last modified: 2016-03-29
The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is the second-largest satellite galaxy of
the Milky Way and is only 60 kpc away. As a nearby, massive, and dense object
with relatively low astrophysical backgrounds, it is a natural target for dark
matter indirect detection searches. In this work, we use six years of Pass 8
data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope to search for gamma-ray signals of
dark matter annihilation in the SMC. Using data-driven fits to the gamma-ray
backgrounds, and a combination of N-body simulations and direct measurements of
rotation curves to estimate the SMC DM density profile, we found that the SMC
was well described by standard astrophysical sources, and no signal from dark
matter annihilation was detected. We set conservative upper limits on the dark
matter annihilation cross section. These constraints are in agreement with
stronger constraints set by searches in the Large Magellanic Cloud and approach
the canonical thermal relic cross section at dark matter masses lower than 10
GeV in the $b\bar{b}$ and $\tau^+\tau^-$ channels.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1602.00091 [pdf] - 1366332
Constraints on Axions and Axionlike Particles from Fermi Large Area
Telescope Observations of Neutron Stars
Submitted: 2016-01-30
We present constraints on the nature of axions and axionlike particles (ALPs)
by analyzing gamma--ray data from neutron stars using the Fermi Large Area
Telescope. In addition to axions solving the strong CP problem of particle
physics, axions and ALPs are also possible dark matter candidates. We
investigate axions and ALPs produced by nucleon--nucleon bremsstrahlung within
neutron stars. We derive a phenomenological model for the gamma--ray spectrum
arising from subsequent axion decays. By analyzing 5 years of gamma-ray data
(between 60 MeV and 200 MeV) for a sample of 4 nearby neutron stars, we do not
find evidence for an axion or ALP signal, thus we obtain a combined 95\%
confidence level upper limit on the axion mass of 7.9$\times 10^{-2}$ eV, which
corresponds to a lower limit for the Peccei-Quinn scale $f_a$ of 7.6$\times
10^7$ GeV. Our constraints are more stringent than previous results probing the
same physical process, and are competitive with results probing axions and ALPs
by different mechanisms.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1601.06781 [pdf] - 1411293
Dark matter subhalos and unidentified sources in the Fermi 3FGL source
catalog
Submitted: 2016-01-25
If dark matter consists of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), dark
matter subhalos in the Milky Way could be detectable as gamma-ray point sources
due to WIMP annihilation. In this work, we perform an updated study of the
detectability of dark matter subhalos as gamma-ray sources with the Fermi Large
Area Telescope (Fermi LAT). We use the results of the Via Lactea II simulation,
scaled to the Planck 2015 cosmological parameters, to predict the local dark
matter subhalo distribution. Under optimistic assumptions for the WIMP
parameters --- a 40 GeV particle annihilating to $b\bar{b}$ with a thermal
cross-section, as required to explain the Galactic center GeV excess --- we
predict that at most $\sim 10$ subhalos might be present in the third Fermi LAT
source catalog (3FGL). This is a smaller number than has been predicted by
prior studies, and we discuss the origin of this difference. We also compare
our predictions for the detectability of subhalos with the number of subhalo
candidate sources in 3FGL, and derive upper limits on the WIMP annihilation
cross-section as a function of the particle mass. If a dark matter
interpretation could be excluded for all 3FGL sources, our constraints would be
competitive with those found by indirect searches using other targets, such as
known Milky Way satellite galaxies.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1508.06128 [pdf] - 1579696
Prospects for Indirect Dark Matter Searches with the Cherenkov Telescope
Array (CTA)
Carr, J.;
Balazs, C.;
Bringmann, T.;
Buanes, T.;
Daniel, M. K.;
Doro, M.;
Farnier, C.;
Fornasa, M.;
Gaskins, J.;
Gomez-Vargas, G. A.;
Hayashida, M.;
Kohri, K.;
Lefranc, V.;
Morselli, A.;
Moulin, E.;
Mirabal, N.;
Rico, J.;
Saito, T.;
Sanchez-Conde, M. A.;
Wilkinson, M.;
Wood, M.;
Zaharijas, G.;
Zechlin, H. -S.
Submitted: 2015-08-25
The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) will have a unique chance of discovery
for a large range of masses in Weakly Interacting Massive Particles models of
dark matter. The principal target for dark matter searches with CTA is the
centre of the Galactic Halo. The best strategy is to perform CTA observations
within a few degrees of the Galactic Centre, with the Galactic Centre itself
and the most intense diffuse emission regions removed from the analysis.
Assuming a cuspy dark matter density profile for the Milky Way, 500 hours of
observations in this region provide sensitivities to and below the thermal
cross-section of dark matter annihilations, for masses between a few hundred
GeV and a few tens of TeV; therefore CTA will have a significant chance of
discovery in some models. Since the dark matter density in the Milky Way is far
from certain in the inner kpc region, other targets are also proposed for
observation, like ultra-faint dwarf galaxies such as Segue 1 with 100 hours per
year proposed. Beyond these two observational targets, further alternatives,
such as Galactic dark clumps, will be considered closer to the actual date of
CTA operations. Sensitivity predictions for dark matter searches are given on
the various targets taking into account the latest instrument response
functions expected for CTA together with a discussion on the systematic
uncertainties from the backgrounds.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1504.04027 [pdf] - 1259496
Improved Limits on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter using Full-Sky Fermi
Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor Data
Submitted: 2015-04-15, last modified: 2015-08-05
A sterile neutrino of ~keV mass is a well motivated dark matter candidate.
Its decay generates an X-ray line that offers a unique target for X-ray
telescopes. For the first time, we use the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
onboard the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope to search for sterile neutrino
decay lines; our analysis covers the energy range 10-25 keV (sterile neutrino
mass 20-50 keV), which is inaccessible to X-ray and gamma-ray satellites such
as Chandra, Suzaku, XMM-Newton, and INTEGRAL. The extremely wide field of view
of the GBM enables a large fraction of the Milky Way dark matter halo to be
probed. After implementing careful data cuts, we obtain ~53 days of full sky
observational data. We observe an excess of photons towards the Galactic
Center, as expected from astrophysical emission. We search for sterile neutrino
decay lines in the energy spectrum, and find no significant signal. From this,
we obtain upper limits on the sterile neutrino mixing angle as a function of
mass. In the sterile neutrino mass range 25-40 keV, we improve upon previous
upper limits by approximately an order of magnitude. Better understanding of
detector and astrophysical backgrounds, as well as detector response, will
further improve the sensitivity of a search with the GBM.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.01020 [pdf] - 1055773
Search for Gamma-ray Emission from Dark Matter Annihilation in the Large
Magellanic Cloud with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
Submitted: 2015-02-03, last modified: 2015-04-15
At a distance of 50 kpc and with a dark matter mass of $\sim10^{10}$
M$_{\odot}$, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) is a natural target for indirect
dark matter searches. We use five years of data from the Fermi Large Area
Telescope (LAT) and updated models of the gamma-ray emission from standard
astrophysical components to search for a dark matter annihilation signal from
the LMC. We perform a rotation curve analysis to determine the dark matter
distribution, setting a robust minimum on the amount of dark matter in the LMC,
which we use to set conservative bounds on the annihilation cross section. The
LMC emission is generally very well described by the standard astrophysical
sources, with at most a $1-2\sigma$ excess identified near the kinematic center
of the LMC once systematic uncertainties are taken into account. We place
competitive bounds on the dark matter annihilation cross section as a function
of dark matter particle mass and annihilation channel.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1502.03399 [pdf] - 934448
Improved limits on sterile neutrino dark matter from full-sky
observations by the Fermi-GBM
Submitted: 2015-02-11
For the first time, we use the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on-board the
Fermi satellite to search for sterile neutrino decay lines in the energy range
10-25 keV corresponding to sterile neutrino mass range 20-50 keV. This energy
range has been out of reach of traditional X-ray satellites such as Chandra,
Suzaku, XMM-Newton, and gamma-ray satellites such as INTEGRAL. Furthermore, the
extremely wide field of view of the GBM opens a large fraction of the Milky Way
dark matter halo to be probed. We start with 1601 days worth of GBM data,
implement stringent data cuts, and perform two simple line search analyses on
the reduced data: in the first, the line flux is limited without background
modeling, and in the second, the background is modeled as a power-law. We find
no significant excess lines in both our searches. We set new limits on sterile
neutrino mixing angles, improving on previous limits by approximately an order
of magnitude. Better understanding of detector and astrophysical backgrounds,
as well as detector response, can further improve the limit.
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307375 [pdf] - 58088
Gamma-ray and synchrotron emission from neutralino annihilation in the
Large Magellanic Cloud
Submitted: 2003-07-21, last modified: 2004-04-29
We calculate the expected flux of gamma-ray and radio emission from the LMC
due to neutralino annihilation. Using rotation curve data to probe the density
profile and assuming a minimum disk, we describe the dark matter halo of the
LMC using models predicted by N-body simulations. We consider a range of
density profiles including the NFW profile, a modified NFW profile proposed by
Hayashi et al.(2003) to account for the effects of tidal stripping, and an
isothermal sphere with a core. We find that the gamma-ray flux expected from
these models may be detectable by GLAST for a significant part of the
neutralino parameter space. The prospects for existing and upcoming Atmospheric
Cherenkov Telescopes are less optimistic, as unrealistically long exposures are
required for detection. However, the effects of adiabatic compression due to
the baryonic component may improve the chances for detection by ACTs. The
maximum flux we predict is well below EGRET's measurements and thus EGRET does
not constrain the parameter space. The expected synchrotron emission generally
lies below the observed radio emission from the LMC in the frequency range of
19.7 to 8550 MHz. As long as <sigma v> <2x 10^-26 cm^3 s^-1 for a neutralino
mass of 50 GeV, the observed radio emission is not primarily due to neutralinos
and is consistent with the assumption that the main source is cosmic rays. We
find that the predicted fluxes, obtained by integrating over the entire LMC,
are not very strongly dependent on the inner slope of the halo profile, varying
by less than an order of magnitude for the range of profiles we considered.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0306561 [pdf] - 358236
Neutralino annihilation gamma-rays from clumps and the LMC
Submitted: 2003-06-26
We discuss the detectability of dark matter clumps in the Milky Way halo due
to neutralino annihilation. We then focus on a known ``clump'', the Large
Magellanic Cloud.
