sort results by

Use logical operators AND, OR, NOT and round brackets to construct complex queries. Whitespace-separated words are treated as ANDed.

Show articles per page in mode

Garecki, Janusz

Normalized to: Garecki, J.

5 article(s) in total. 2 co-authors, from 1 to 5 common article(s). Median position in authors list is 2,0.

[1]  oai:arXiv.org:0905.4534  [pdf] - 125735
Statefinders and observational measurement of superenergy
Comments: REVTEX 4.0, 7 pages, no figures
Submitted: 2009-05-27
The superenergy of the universe is a tensorial quantity and it is a general relativistic analogue of the Appell's energy of acceleration in classical mechanics. We propose the measurement of this quantity by the observational parameters such as the Hubble parameter, the deceleration parameter, the jerk and the snap (kerk) known as statefinders. We show that the superenergy of gravity requires only the Hubble and deceleration parameter to be measured, while the superenergy of matter requires also the measurement of the higher-order characteristics of expansion: the jerk and the snap. In such a way, the superenergy becomes another parameter characterizing the evolution of the universe.
[2]  oai:arXiv.org:0806.2683  [pdf] - 13605
Conformal transformations and conformal invariance in gravitation
Comments: REVTEX 4, 28 pages, no figures, version to match a published paper
Submitted: 2008-06-16, last modified: 2009-01-05
Conformal transformations are frequently used tools in order to study relations between various theories of gravity and the Einstein relativity. In this paper we discuss the rules of these transformations for geometric quantities as well as for the matter energy-momentum tensor. We show the subtlety of the matter energy-momentum conservation law which refers to the fact that the conformal transformation "creates" an extra matter term composed of the conformal factor which enters the conservation law. In an extreme case of the flat original spacetime the matter is "created" due to work done by the conformal transformation to bend the spacetime which was originally flat. We discuss how to construct the conformally invariant gravity theories and also find the conformal transformation rules for the curvature invariants $R^2$, $R_{ab}R^{ab}$, $R_{abcd}R^{abcd}$ and the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in a spacetime of an arbitrary dimension. Finally, we present the conformal transformation rules in the fashion of the duality transformations of the superstring theory. In such a case the transitions between conformal frames reduce to a simple change of the sign of a redefined conformal factor.
[3]  oai:arXiv.org:0712.1358  [pdf] - 436196
Energy, angular momentum, superenergy and angular supermomentum in conformal frames
Comments: REVTEX 4, 21 pages, no figures, minor changes, references added
Submitted: 2007-12-09, last modified: 2007-12-14
We find the rules of the conformal transformation for the energetic quantities such as the Einstein energy-momentum complex, the Bergmann-Thomson angular momentum complex, the superenergy tensor, and the angular supermomentum tensor of gravitation and matter. We show that the conformal transformation rules for the matter parts of both the Einstein complex and the Bergmann-Thomson complex are fairly simple, while the transformation rules for their gravitational parts are more complicated. We also find that the transformational rules of the superenergy tensor of matter and the superenergy tensor of gravity are quite complicated except for the case of a pure gravity. In such a special case the superenergy density as well as the sum of the superenergy density and the matter energy density are invariants of the conformal transformation. Besides, in that case, a conformal invariant is also the Bel-Robinson tensor which is a part of the superenergy tensor. As for the angular supermomentum tensor of gravity - it emerges that its transformational rule even for a pure gravity is quite complicated but this is not the case for the angular supermomentum tensor of matter. Having investigated some technicalities of the conformal transformations, we also find the conformal transformation rule for the curvature invariants and, in particular, for the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in a spacetime of arbitrary dimension.
[4]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0309064  [pdf] - 111325
Energy-momentum and angular momentum of Goedel universes
Comments: an amended version, 24 pages, accepted to PRD
Submitted: 2003-09-12, last modified: 2004-05-17
We discuss the Einstein energy-momentum complex and the Bergmann-Thomson angular momentum complex in general relativity and calculate them for space-time homogeneous Goedel universes. The calculations are performed for a dust acausal model and for a scalar-field causal model. It is shown that the Einstein pseudotensor is traceless, not symmetric, the gravitational energy is "density" is negative and the gravitational Poynting vector vanishes. Significantly, the total (gravitational and matter) energy "density" fro the acausal model is zero while for the casual model it is negative.The Bergmann-Thomson angular momentum complex does not vanish for both G\"odel models.
[5]  oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0102092  [pdf] - 110710
Superenergy and Supermomentum of Goedel Universes
Comments: an amended version, REVTEX, 26 pages, no figures, to appear in Classical and Quantum Gravity
Submitted: 2001-02-21, last modified: 2001-08-27
We review the canonical superenergy tensor and the canonical angular supermomentum tensors in general relativity and calculate them for space-time homogeneous G\"odel universes to show that both of these tensors do not, in general, vanish. We consider both an original dust-filled pressureless acausal G\"odel model of 1949 and a scalar-field-filled causal G\"odel model of Rebou\c cas and Tiomno. For the acausal model, the non-vanishing components of superenergy of matter are different from those of gravitation. The angular supermomentum tensors of matter and gravitation do not vanish either which simply reflects the fact that G\"odel universe rotates. However, the axial (totally antisymmetric) and vectorial parts of supermomentum tensors vanish. It is interesting that superenergetic quantities are {\it sensitive} to causality in a way that superenergy density $_g S_{00}$ of gravitation in the acausal model is {\it positive}, while superenergy density $_g S_{00}$ in the causal model is {\it negative}. That means superenergetic quantities might serve as criterion of causality in cosmology and prove useful.