Normalized to: Garecki, J.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:0905.4534 [pdf] - 125735
Statefinders and observational measurement of superenergy
Submitted: 2009-05-27
The superenergy of the universe is a tensorial quantity and it is a general
relativistic analogue of the Appell's energy of acceleration in classical
mechanics. We propose the measurement of this quantity by the observational
parameters such as the Hubble parameter, the deceleration parameter, the jerk
and the snap (kerk) known as statefinders. We show that the superenergy of
gravity requires only the Hubble and deceleration parameter to be measured,
while the superenergy of matter requires also the measurement of the
higher-order characteristics of expansion: the jerk and the snap. In such a
way, the superenergy becomes another parameter characterizing the evolution of
the universe.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:0806.2683 [pdf] - 13605
Conformal transformations and conformal invariance in gravitation
Submitted: 2008-06-16, last modified: 2009-01-05
Conformal transformations are frequently used tools in order to study
relations between various theories of gravity and the Einstein relativity. In
this paper we discuss the rules of these transformations for geometric
quantities as well as for the matter energy-momentum tensor. We show the
subtlety of the matter energy-momentum conservation law which refers to the
fact that the conformal transformation "creates" an extra matter term composed
of the conformal factor which enters the conservation law. In an extreme case
of the flat original spacetime the matter is "created" due to work done by the
conformal transformation to bend the spacetime which was originally flat. We
discuss how to construct the conformally invariant gravity theories and also
find the conformal transformation rules for the curvature invariants $R^2$,
$R_{ab}R^{ab}$, $R_{abcd}R^{abcd}$ and the Gauss-Bonnet invariant in a
spacetime of an arbitrary dimension. Finally, we present the conformal
transformation rules in the fashion of the duality transformations of the
superstring theory. In such a case the transitions between conformal frames
reduce to a simple change of the sign of a redefined conformal factor.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:0712.1358 [pdf] - 436196
Energy, angular momentum, superenergy and angular supermomentum in
conformal frames
Submitted: 2007-12-09, last modified: 2007-12-14
We find the rules of the conformal transformation for the energetic
quantities such as the Einstein energy-momentum complex, the Bergmann-Thomson
angular momentum complex, the superenergy tensor, and the angular supermomentum
tensor of gravitation and matter. We show that the conformal transformation
rules for the matter parts of both the Einstein complex and the
Bergmann-Thomson complex are fairly simple, while the transformation rules for
their gravitational parts are more complicated. We also find that the
transformational rules of the superenergy tensor of matter and the superenergy
tensor of gravity are quite complicated except for the case of a pure gravity.
In such a special case the superenergy density as well as the sum of the
superenergy density and the matter energy density are invariants of the
conformal transformation. Besides, in that case, a conformal invariant is also
the Bel-Robinson tensor which is a part of the superenergy tensor. As for the
angular supermomentum tensor of gravity - it emerges that its transformational
rule even for a pure gravity is quite complicated but this is not the case for
the angular supermomentum tensor of matter. Having investigated some
technicalities of the conformal transformations, we also find the conformal
transformation rule for the curvature invariants and, in particular, for the
Gauss-Bonnet invariant in a spacetime of arbitrary dimension.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0309064 [pdf] - 111325
Energy-momentum and angular momentum of Goedel universes
Submitted: 2003-09-12, last modified: 2004-05-17
We discuss the Einstein energy-momentum complex and the Bergmann-Thomson
angular momentum complex in general relativity and calculate them for
space-time homogeneous Goedel universes. The calculations are performed for a
dust acausal model and for a scalar-field causal model. It is shown that the
Einstein pseudotensor is traceless, not symmetric, the gravitational energy is
"density" is negative and the gravitational Poynting vector vanishes.
Significantly, the total (gravitational and matter) energy "density" fro the
acausal model is zero while for the casual model it is negative.The
Bergmann-Thomson angular momentum complex does not vanish for both G\"odel
models.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0102092 [pdf] - 110710
Superenergy and Supermomentum of Goedel Universes
Submitted: 2001-02-21, last modified: 2001-08-27
We review the canonical superenergy tensor and the canonical angular
supermomentum tensors in general relativity and calculate them for space-time
homogeneous G\"odel universes to show that both of these tensors do not, in
general, vanish. We consider both an original dust-filled pressureless acausal
G\"odel model of 1949 and a scalar-field-filled causal G\"odel model of Rebou\c
cas and Tiomno. For the acausal model, the non-vanishing components of
superenergy of matter are different from those of gravitation. The angular
supermomentum tensors of matter and gravitation do not vanish either which
simply reflects the fact that G\"odel universe rotates. However, the axial
(totally antisymmetric) and vectorial parts of supermomentum tensors vanish. It
is interesting that superenergetic quantities are {\it sensitive} to causality
in a way that superenergy density $_g S_{00}$ of gravitation in the acausal
model is {\it positive}, while superenergy density $_g S_{00}$ in the causal
model is {\it negative}. That means superenergetic quantities might serve as
criterion of causality in cosmology and prove useful.