Normalized to: Galan, A.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:2007.02941 [pdf] - 2129480
TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of
the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
Birrer, S.;
Shajib, A. J.;
Galan, A.;
Millon, M.;
Treu, T.;
Agnello, A.;
Auger, M.;
Chen, G. C. -F.;
Christensen, L.;
Collett, T.;
Courbin, F.;
Fassnacht, C. D.;
Koopmans, L. V. E.;
Marshall, P. J.;
Park, J. -W.;
Rusu, C. E.;
Sluse, D.;
Spiniello, C.;
Suyu, S. H.;
Wagner-Carena, S.;
Wong, K. C.;
Barnabè, M.;
Bolton, A. S.;
Czoske, O.;
Ding, X.;
Frieman, J. A.;
Van de Vyvere, L.
Submitted: 2020-07-06
The H0LiCOW collaboration inferred via gravitational lensing time delays a
Hubble constant $H_0=73.3^{+1.7}_{-1.8}$ km s$^{-1}{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, describing
deflector mass density profiles by either a power-law or stars plus standard
dark matter halos. The mass-sheet transform (MST) that leaves the lensing
observables unchanged is considered the dominant source of residual uncertainty
in $H_0$. We quantify any potential effect of the MST with flexible mass models
that are maximally degenerate with H0. Our calculation is based on a new
hierarchical approach in which the MST is only constrained by stellar
kinematics. The approach is validated on hydrodynamically simulated lenses. We
apply the method to the TDCOSMO sample of 7 lenses (6 from H0LiCOW) and measure
$H_0=74.5^{+5.6}_{-6.1}$ km s$^{-1}{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. In order to further
constrain the deflector mass profiles, we then add imaging and spectroscopy for
33 strong gravitational lenses from the SLACS sample. For 9 of the SLAC lenses
we use resolved kinematics to constrain the stellar anisotropy. From the joint
analysis of the TDCOSMO+SLACS sample, we measure $H_0=67.4^{+4.1}_{-3.2}$ km
s$^{-1}{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, assuming that the TDCOSMO and SLACS galaxies are drawn
from the same parent population. The blind H0LiCOW, TDCOSMO-only and
TDCOSMO+SLACS analyses are in mutual statistical agreement. The TDCOSMO+SLACS
analysis prefers marginally shallower mass profiles than H0LiCOW or
TDCOSMO-only. While our new analysis does not statistically invalidate the mass
profile assumptions by H0LiCOW, and thus their $H_0$ measurement relying on
those, it demonstrates the importance of understanding the mass density profile
of elliptical galaxies. The uncertainties on $H_0$ derived in this paper can be
reduced by physical or observational priors on the form of the mass profile, or
by additional data, chiefly spatially resolved kinematics of lens galaxies.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1912.08027 [pdf] - 2124587
TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference
of $H_0$ from time-delay cosmography
Millon, M.;
Galan, A.;
Courbin, F.;
Treu, T.;
Suyu, S. H.;
Ding, X.;
Birrer, S.;
Chen, G. C. -F.;
Shajib, A. J.;
Sluse, D.;
Wong, K. C.;
Agnello, A.;
Auger, M. W.;
Buckley-Geer, E. J.;
Chan, J. H. H.;
Collett, T.;
Fassnacht, C. D.;
Hilbert, S.;
Koopmans, L. V. E.;
Motta, V.;
Mukherjee, S.;
Rusu, C. E.;
Sonnenfeld, A.;
Spiniello, C.;
Van de Vyvere, L.
Submitted: 2019-12-17, last modified: 2020-06-30
Time-delay cosmography of lensed quasars has achieved 2.4% precision on the
measurement of the Hubble constant, $H_0$. As part of an ongoing effort to
uncover and control systematic uncertainties, we investigate three potential
sources: 1- stellar kinematics, 2- line-of-sight effects, and 3- the deflector
mass model. To meet this goal in a quantitative way, we reproduced the
H0LiCOW/SHARP/STRIDES (hereafter TDCOSMO) procedures on a set of real and
simulated data, and we find the following. First, stellar kinematics cannot be
a dominant source of error or bias since we find that a systematic change of
10% of measured velocity dispersion leads to only a 0.7% shift on $H_0$ from
the seven lenses analyzed by TDCOSMO. Second, we find no bias to arise from
incorrect estimation of the line-of-sight effects. Third, we show that
elliptical composite (stars + dark matter halo), power-law, and cored power-law
mass profiles have the flexibility to yield a broad range in $H_0$ values.
However, the TDCOSMO procedures that model the data with both composite and
power-law mass profiles are informative. If the models agree, as we observe in
real systems owing to the "bulge-halo" conspiracy, $H_0$ is recovered precisely
and accurately by both models. If the two models disagree, as in the case of
some pathological models illustrated here, the TDCOSMO procedure either
discriminates between them through the goodness of fit, or it accounts for the
discrepancy in the final error bars provided by the analysis. This conclusion
is consistent with a reanalysis of six of the TDCOSMO (real) lenses: the
composite model yields $H_0=74.2^{+1.6}_{-1.6}$ $km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}$, while the
power-law model yields $74.0^{+1.7}_{-1.8}$ $km.s^{-1}.Mpc^{-1}$. In
conclusion, we find no evidence of bias or errors larger than the current
statistical uncertainties reported by TDCOSMO.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:2005.13550 [pdf] - 2103485
Testing the Evolution of the Correlations between Supermassive Black
Holes and their Host Galaxies using Eight Strongly Lensed Quasars
Ding, Xuheng;
Treu, Tommaso;
Birrer, Simon;
Agnello, Adriano;
Sluse, Dominique;
Fassnacht, Chris;
Auger, Matthew W.;
Wong, Kenneth C.;
Suyu, Sherry H.;
Morishita, Takahiro;
Rusu, Cristian E.;
Galan, Aymeric
Submitted: 2020-05-27
One of the main challenges in using high redshift active galactic nuclei to
study the correlations between the mass of the supermassive Black Hole (MBH)
and the properties of their active host galaxies is instrumental resolution.
Strong lensing magnification effectively increases instrumental resolution and
thus helps to address this challenge. In this work, we study eight strongly
lensed active galactic nuclei (AGN) with deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging,
using the lens modelling code Lenstronomy to reconstruct the image of the
source. Using the reconstructed brightness of the host galaxy, we infer the
host galaxy stellar mass based on stellar population models. MBH are estimated
from broad emission lines using standard methods. Our results are in good
agreement with recent work based on non-lensed AGN, providing additional
evidence that the correlation evolves over cosmic time. At the moment, the
sample size of lensed AGN is small and thus they provide mostly a consistency
check on systematic errors related to resolution for the non-lensed AGN.
However, the number of known lensed AGN is expected to increase dramatically in
the next few years, through dedicated searches in ground and space based wide
field surveys, and they may become a key diagnostic of black hole and galaxy
co-evolution.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1910.06306 [pdf] - 2078211
STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the
strong lens system DES J0408-5354
Shajib, A. J.;
Birrer, S.;
Treu, T.;
Agnello, A.;
Buckley-Geer, E. J.;
Chan, J. H. H.;
Christensen, L.;
Lemon, C.;
Lin, H.;
Millon, M.;
Poh, J.;
Rusu, C. E.;
Sluse, D.;
Spiniello, C.;
Chen, G. C. -F.;
Collett, T.;
Courbin, F.;
Fassnacht, C. D.;
Frieman, J.;
Galan, A.;
Gilman, D.;
More, A.;
Anguita, T.;
Auger, M. W.;
Bonvin, V.;
McMahon, R.;
Meylan, G.;
Wong, K. C.;
Abbott, T. M. C.;
Annis, J.;
Avila, S.;
Bechtol, K.;
Brooks, D.;
Brout, D.;
Burke, D. L.;
Rosell, A. Carnero;
Kind, M. Carrasco;
Carretero, J.;
Castander, F. J.;
Costanzi, M.;
da Costa, L. N.;
De Vicente, J.;
Desai, S.;
Dietrich, J. P.;
Doel, P.;
Drlica-Wagner, A.;
Evrard, A. E.;
Finley, D. A.;
Flaugher, B.;
Fosalba, P.;
García-Bellido, J.;
Gerdes, D. W.;
Gruen, D.;
Gruendl, R. A.;
Gschwend, J.;
Gutierrez, G.;
Hollowood, D. L.;
Honscheid, K.;
Huterer, D.;
James, D. J.;
Jeltema, T.;
Krause, E.;
Kuropatkin, N.;
Li, T. S.;
Lima, M.;
MacCrann, N.;
Maia, M. A. G.;
Marshall, J. L.;
Melchior, P.;
Miquel, R.;
Ogando, R. L. C.;
Palmese, A.;
Paz-Chinchón, F.;
Plazas, A. A.;
Romer, A. K.;
Roodman, A.;
Sako, M.;
Sanchez, E.;
Santiago, B.;
Scarpine, V.;
Schubnell, M.;
Scolnic, D.;
Serrano, S.;
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.;
Smith, M.;
Soares-Santos, M.;
Suchyta, E.;
Tarle, G.;
Thomas, D.;
Walker, A. R.;
Zhang, Y.
Submitted: 2019-10-14, last modified: 2020-04-14
We present a blind time-delay cosmographic analysis for the lens system DES
J0408$-$5354. This system is extraordinary for the presence of two sets of
multiple images at different redshifts, which provide the opportunity to obtain
more information at the cost of increased modelling complexity with respect to
previously analyzed systems. We perform detailed modelling of the mass
distribution for this lens system using three band Hubble Space Telescope
imaging. We combine the measured time delays, line-of-sight central velocity
dispersion of the deflector, and statistically constrained external convergence
with our lens models to estimate two cosmological distances. We measure the
"effective" time-delay distance corresponding to the redshifts of the deflector
and the lensed quasar $D_{\Delta t}^{\rm eff}=3382^{+146}_{-115}$ Mpc and the
angular diameter distance to the deflector $D_{\rm d}=1711^{+376}_{-280}$ Mpc,
with covariance between the two distances. From these constraints on the
cosmological distances, we infer the Hubble constant $H_0 = 74.2^{+2.7}_{-3.0}$
km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ assuming a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology and a uniform
prior for $\Omega_{\rm m}$ as $\Omega_{\rm m} \sim \mathcal{U}(0.05, 0.5)$.
This measurement gives the most precise constraint on $H_0$ to date from a
single lens. Our measurement is consistent with that obtained from the previous
sample of six lenses analyzed by the $H_0$ Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring
(H0LiCOW) collaboration. It is also consistent with measurements of $H_0$ based
on the local distance ladder, reinforcing the tension with the inference from
early Universe probes, for example, with 2.2$\sigma$ discrepancy from the
cosmic microwave background measurement.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:2002.05736 [pdf] - 2048631
COSMOGRAIL XIX: Time delays in 18 strongly lensed quasars from 15 years
of optical monitoring
Millon, M.;
Courbin, F.;
Bonvin, V.;
Paic, E.;
Meylan, G.;
Tewes, M.;
Sluse, D.;
Magain, P.;
Chan, J. H. H.;
Galan, A.;
Joseph, R.;
Lemon, C.;
Tihhonova, O.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Marmier, M.;
Chazelas, B.;
Lendl, M.;
Triaud, A. H. M. J.;
Wyttenbach, A.
Submitted: 2020-02-13
We present the results of 15 years of monitoring of lensed quasars conducted
by the COSMOGRAIL program at the Leonhard Euler 1.2m Swiss Telescope. The
decade-long light curves of 23 lensed QSOs are presented for the first time. We
complement our data set with other monitoring data available in the literature
to measure the time delays in 18 systems, among which 9 reach a relative
precision better than 15% for at least one time delay. To achieve this, we
develop an automated version of the curve-shifting toolbox PyCS to ensure
robust estimation of the time delay in the presence of microlensing while
accounting for the errors due to imperfect representation of microlensing. We
also reanalyze the previously published time delays of RX J1131$-$1231 and HE
0435$-$1223, adding respectively 6 and 2 new seasons of monitoring and
confirming the previous time-delay measurements. When the time delay
measurement is possible, we correct the light curves of the lensed images from
their time delay and present the difference curves to highlight the
microlensing signal contained in the data. This is to date the largest sample
of decade-long lens monitoring data, useful to measure $H_0$, to measure the
size of quasar accretion disks with microlensing, and to study quasar
variability.