Normalized to: Gai, M.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1908.06451 [pdf] - 1945074
Comment on N. Rijal et al. "Measurement of d + 7Be Cross Sections for
Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis"
Submitted: 2019-08-18
Rijal, et al. in their recent publication [Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 122}, 182701
(2019), arXiv:1808.07893], on "Measurement of d + $^7$Be Cross Sections for
Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)", misrepresent their result, they misrepresent
previous work of Parker (72) and of Caughlan and Fowler (88), and quite
possibly, contradicts the very BBN theory that has been established over the
last few decades. This comment is intended to correct these misrepresentations
and critically review their claims on BBN.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09378 [pdf] - 1732652
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Gaia Collaboration;
Babusiaux, C.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Jordi, C.;
Vallenari, A.;
Bossini, D.;
Bressan, A.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Walton, N. A.;
Arenou, F.;
Bastian, U.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Bakker, J.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
DeAngeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Holl, B.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Teyssier, D.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Audard, M.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Burgess, P.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Clotet, M.;
Creevey, O.;
Davidson, M.;
DeRidder, J.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Frémat, Y.;
Galluccio, L.;
García-Torres, M.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Gosset, E.;
Guy, L. P.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hernández, J.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Jordan, S.;
Korn, A. J.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Löffler, W.;
Manteiga, M.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Mora, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Richards, P. J.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Süveges, M.;
Torra, J.;
vanReeven, W.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aerts, C.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alvarez, R.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Arcay, B.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Balm, P.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbato, D.;
Barblan, F.;
Barklem, P. S.;
Barrado, D.;
Barros, M.;
Muñoz, S. Bartholomé;
Bassilana, J. -L.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Boeche, C.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Bramante, L.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Brugaletta, E.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cannizzaro, G.;
Carballo, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Casamiquela, L.;
Castellani, M.;
Castro-Ginard, A.;
Charlot, P.;
Chemin, L.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Cocozza, G.;
Costigan, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Crifo, F.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Cuypers, J.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
deLaverny, P.;
DeLuise, F.;
DeMarch, R.;
deMartino, D.;
deSouza, R.;
deTorres, A.;
Debosscher, J.;
delPozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Diakite, S.;
Diener, C.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Eriksson, K.;
Esquej, P.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernique, P.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Frézouls, B.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavel, A.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Giacobbe, P.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Glass, F.;
Gomes, M.;
Granvik, M.;
Gueguen, A.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Hauser, M.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Heu, J.;
Hilger, T.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holland, G.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Janßen, K.;
JevardatdeFombelle, G.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Juhász, Á. L.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kewley, A.;
Klar, J.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, M.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.;
Koubsky, P.;
Lambert, S.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lasne, Y.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
LeFustec, Y.;
LePoncin-Lafitte, C.;
Lebreton, Y.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
López, M.;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martino, M.;
Marton, G.;
Mary, N.;
Massari, D.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molnár, L.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Panahi, A.;
Pawlak, M.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poggio, E.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Racero, E.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Riclet, F.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rivard, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roegiers, T.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sanna, N.;
Santana-Ros, T.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Ségransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Siltala, L.;
Silva, A. F.;
Smart, R. L.;
Smith, K. W.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
SoriaNieto, S.;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Teyssandier, P.;
Thuillot, W.;
Titarenko, A.;
TorraClotet, F.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Uzzi, S.;
Vaillant, M.;
Valentini, G.;
Valette, V.;
vanElteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
Vaschetto, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Viala, Y.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
vonEssen, C.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Wertz, O.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zorec, J.;
Zschocke, S.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.
Submitted: 2018-04-25, last modified: 2018-08-13
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1804.09366 [pdf] - 1732648
Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
Lindegren, L.;
Hernandez, J.;
Bombrun, A.;
Klioner, S.;
Bastian, U.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
de Torres, A.;
Steidelmuller, H.;
Stephenson, C.;
Hobbs, D.;
Lammers, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Geyer, R.;
Hilger, T.;
Michalik, D.;
Stampa, U.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Castaneda, J.;
Clotet, M.;
Comoretto, G.;
Davidson, M.;
Fabricius, C.;
Gracia, G.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hutton, A.;
Mora, A.;
Portell, J.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Abbas, U.;
Abreu, A.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anglada, E.;
Balaguer-Nunez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Bertone, S.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brusemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Carlucci, T.;
Charlot, P.;
Cheek, N.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
de Bruijne, J.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Esquej, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Gonzalez-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hauser, M.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lister, T.;
Loffler, W.;
Marchant, J.;
Martin-Fleitas, J. -M.;
Messineo, R.;
Mignard, F.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Poggio, E.;
Riva, A.;
Rowell, N.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R. L.;
Spagna, A.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Elteren, A.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.
Submitted: 2018-04-25
Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) contains results for 1693 million sources in
the magnitude range 3 to 21 based on observations collected by the European
Space Agency Gaia satellite during the first 22 months of its operational
phase. We describe the input data, models, and processing used for the
astrometric content of Gaia DR2, and the validation of these results performed
within the astrometry task. Some 320 billion centroid positions from the
pre-processed astrometric CCD observations were used to estimate the five
astrometric parameters (positions, parallaxes, and proper motions) for 1332
million sources, and approximate positions at the reference epoch J2015.5 for
an additional 361 million mostly faint sources. Special validation solutions
were used to characterise the random and systematic errors in parallax and
proper motion. For the sources with five-parameter astrometric solutions, the
median uncertainty in parallax and position at the reference epoch J2015.5 is
about 0.04 mas for bright (G<14 mag) sources, 0.1 mas at G=17 mag, and 0.7 mas
at G=20 mag. In the proper motion components the corresponding uncertainties
are 0.05, 0.2, and 1.2 mas/yr, respectively. The optical reference frame
defined by Gaia DR2 is aligned with ICRS and is non-rotating with respect to
the quasars to within 0.15 mas/yr. From the quasars and validation solutions we
estimate that systematics in the parallaxes depending on position, magnitude,
and colour are generally below 0.1 mas, but the parallaxes are on the whole too
small by about 0.03 mas. Significant spatial correlations of up to 0.04 mas in
parallax and 0.07 mas/yr in proper motion are seen on small (<1 deg) and
intermediate (20 deg) angular scales. Important statistics and information for
the users of the Gaia DR2 astrometry are given in the appendices.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1705.00688 [pdf] - 1583007
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR
Lyrae stars
Gaia Collaboration;
Clementini, G.;
Eyer, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Marconi, M.;
Muraveva, T.;
Garofalo, A.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Palmer, M.;
Luri, X.;
Molinaro, R.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Szabados, L.;
Musella, I.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Vallenari, A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Bastian, U.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Jansen, F.;
Jordi, C.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Lindegren, L.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Azntoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernánde, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffler, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegriffo, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingrill, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernstein, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclark, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardiol, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poels, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-05-01
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae
stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are
published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the
primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve
astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation,
we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity
($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids
and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity
($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on
TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band
($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances
available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by
linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct
transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based
luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes
bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The
relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and
form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes
of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2
(DR2) in 2018.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:1703.01131 [pdf] - 1567701
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations,
and future prospects
Gaia Collaboration;
van Leeuwen, F.;
Vallenari, A.;
Jordi, C.;
Lindegren, L.;
Bastian, U.;
Prusti, T.;
de Bruijne, J. H. J.;
Brown, A. G. A.;
Babusiaux, C.;
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L.;
Biermann, M.;
Evans, D. W.;
Eyer, L.;
Jansen, F.;
Klioner, S. A.;
Lammers, U.;
Luri, X.;
Mignard, F.;
Panem, C.;
Pourbaix, D.;
Randich, S.;
Sartoretti, P.;
Siddiqui, H. I.;
Soubiran, C.;
Valette, V.;
Walton, N. A.;
Aerts, C.;
Arenou, F.;
Cropper, M.;
Drimmel, R.;
Høg, E.;
Katz, D.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
O'Mullane, W.;
Grebel, E. K.;
Holland, A. D.;
Huc, C.;
Passot, X.;
Perryman, M.;
Bramante, L.;
Cacciari, C.;
Castañeda, J.;
Chaoul, L.;
Cheek, N.;
De Angeli, F.;
Fabricius, C.;
Guerra, R.;
Hernández, J.;
Jean-Antoine-Piccolo, A.;
Masana, E.;
Messineo, R.;
Mowlavi, N.;
Nienartowicz, K.;
Ordóñez-Blanco, D.;
Panuzzo, P.;
Portell, J.;
Richards, P. J.;
Riello, M.;
Seabroke, G. M.;
Tanga, P.;
Thévenin, F.;
Torra, J.;
Els, S. G.;
Gracia-Abril, G.;
Comoretto, G.;
Garcia-Reinaldos, M.;
Lock, T.;
Mercier, E.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrae, R.;
Astraatmadja, T. L.;
Bellas-Velidis, I.;
Benson, K.;
Berthier, J.;
Blomme, R.;
Busso, G.;
Carry, B.;
Cellino, A.;
Clementini, G.;
Cowell, S.;
Creevey, O.;
Cuypers, J.;
Davidson, M.;
De Ridder, J.;
de Torres, A.;
Delchambre, L.;
Dell'Oro, A.;
Ducourant, C.;
Frémat, Y.;
García-Torres, M.;
Gosset, E.;
Halbwachs, J. -L.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Harrison, D. L.;
Hauser, M.;
Hestroffer, D.;
Hodgkin, S. T.;
Huckle, H. E.;
Hutton, A.;
Jasniewicz, G.;
Jordan, S.;
Kontizas, M.;
Korn, A. J.;
Lanzafame, A. C.;
Manteiga, M.;
Moitinho, A.;
Muinonen, K.;
Osinde, J.;
Pancino, E.;
Pauwels, T.;
Petit, J. -M.;
Recio-Blanco, A.;
Robin, A. C.;
Sarro, L. M.;
Siopis, C.;
Smith, M.;
Smith, K. W.;
Sozzetti, A.;
Thuillot, W.;
van Reeven, W.;
Viala, Y.;
Abbas, U.;
Aramburu, A. Abreu;
Accart, S.;
Aguado, J. J.;
Allan, P. M.;
Allasia, W.;
Altavilla, G.;
Álvarez, M. A.;
Alves, J.;
Anderson, R. I.;
Andrei, A. H.;
Varela, E. Anglada;
Antiche, E.;
Antoja, T.;
Antón, S.;
Arcay, B.;
Bach, N.;
Baker, S. G.;
Balaguer-Núñez, L.;
Barache, C.;
Barata, C.;
Barbier, A.;
Barblan, F.;
Navascués, D. Barrado y;
Barros, M.;
Barstow, M. A.;
Becciani, U.;
Bellazzini, M.;
García, A. Bello;
Belokurov, V.;
Bendjoya, P.;
Berihuete, A.;
Bianchi, L.;
Bienaymé, O.;
Billebaud, F.;
Blagorodnova, N.;
Blanco-Cuaresma, S.;
Boch, T.;
Bombrun, A.;
Borrachero, R.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Bouy, H.;
Bragaglia, A.;
Breddels, M. A.;
Brouillet, N.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Burgess, P.;
Burgon, R.;
Burlacu, A.;
Busonero, D.;
Buzzi, R.;
Caffau, E.;
Cambras, J.;
Campbell, H.;
Cancelliere, R.;
Cantat-Gaudin, T.;
Carlucci, T.;
Carrasco, J. M.;
Castellani, M.;
Charlot, P.;
Charnas, J.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Clotet, M.;
Cocozza, G.;
Collins, R. S.;
Costigan, G.;
Crifo, F.;
Cross, N. J. G.;
Crosta, M.;
Crowley, C.;
Dafonte, C.;
Damerdji, Y.;
Dapergolas, A.;
David, P.;
David, M.;
De Cat, P.;
de Felice, F.;
de Laverny, P.;
De Luise, F.;
De March, R.;
de Martino, D.;
de Souza, R.;
Debosscher, J.;
del Pozo, E.;
Delbo, M.;
Delgado, A.;
Delgado, H. E.;
Di Matteo, P.;
Diakite, S.;
Distefano, E.;
Dolding, C.;
Anjos, S. Dos;
Drazinos, P.;
Durán, J.;
Dzigan, Y.;
Edvardsson, B.;
Enke, H.;
Evans, N. W.;
Bontemps, G. Eynard;
Fabre, C.;
Fabrizio, M.;
Faigler, S.;
Falcão, A. J.;
Casas, M. Farràs;
Federici, L.;
Fedorets, G.;
Fernández-Hernández, J.;
Fernique, P.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Filippi, F.;
Findeisen, K.;
Fonti, A.;
Fouesneau, M.;
Fraile, E.;
Fraser, M.;
Fuchs, J.;
Gai, M.;
Galleti, S.;
Galluccio, L.;
Garabato, D.;
García-Sedano, F.;
Garofalo, A.;
Garralda, N.;
Gavras, P.;
Gerssen, J.;
Geyer, R.;
Gilmore, G.;
Girona, S.;
Giuffrida, G.;
Gomes, M.;
González-Marcos, A.;
González-Núñez, J.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Granvik, M.;
Guerrier, A.;
Guillout, P.;
Guiraud, J.;
Gúrpide, A.;
Gutiérrez-Sánchez, R.;
Guy, L. P.;
Haigron, R.;
Hatzidimitriou, D.;
Haywood, M.;
Heiter, U.;
Helmi, A.;
Hobbs, D.;
Hofmann, W.;
Holl, B.;
Holland, G.;
Hunt, J. A. S.;
Hypki, A.;
Icardi, V.;
Irwin, M.;
de Fombelle, G. Jevardat;
Jofré, P.;
Jonker, P. G.;
Jorissen, A.;
Julbe, F.;
Karampelas, A.;
Kochoska, A.;
Kohley, R.;
Kolenberg, K.;
Kontizas, E.;
Koposov, S. E.;
Kordopatis, G.;
Koubsky, P.;
Krone-Martins, A.;
Kudryashova, M.;
Kull, I.;
Bachchan, R. K.;
Lacoste-Seris, F.;
Lanza, A. F.;
Lavigne, J. -B.;
Poncin-Lafitte, C. Le;
Lebreton, Y.;
Lebzelter, T.;
Leccia, S.;
Leclerc, N.;
Lecoeur-Taibi, I.;
Lemaitre, V.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Leroux, F.;
Liao, S.;
Licata, E.;
Lindstrøm, H. E. P.;
Lister, T. A.;
Livanou, E.;
Lobel, A.;
Löffer, W.;
López, M.;
Lorenz, D.;
MacDonald, I.;
Fernandes, T. Magalhães;
Managau, S.;
Mann, R. G.;
Mantelet, G.;
Marchal, O.;
Marchant, J. M.;
Marconi, M.;
Marinoni, S.;
Marrese, P. M.;
Marschalkó, G.;
Marshall, D. J.;
Martín-Fleitas, J. M.;
Martino, M.;
Mary, N.;
Matijevič, G.;
Mazeh, T.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Messina, S.;
Michalik, D.;
Millar, N. R.;
Miranda, B. M. H.;
Molina, D.;
Molinaro, R.;
Molinaro, M.;
Molnár, L.;
Moniez, M.;
Montegrio, P.;
Mor, R.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Morel, T.;
Morgenthaler, S.;
Morris, D.;
Mulone, A. F.;
Muraveva, T.;
Musella, I.;
Narbonne, J.;
Nelemans, G.;
Nicastro, L.;
Noval, L.;
Ordénovic, C.;
Ordieres-Meré, J.;
Osborne, P.;
Pagani, C.;
Pagano, I.;
Pailler, F.;
Palacin, H.;
Palaversa, L.;
Parsons, P.;
Pecoraro, M.;
Pedrosa, R.;
Pentikäinen, H.;
Pichon, B.;
Piersimoni, A. M.;
Pineau, F. -X.;
Plachy, E.;
Plum, G.;
Poujoulet, E.;
Prša, A.;
Pulone, L.;
Ragaini, S.;
Rago, S.;
Rambaux, N.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Ranalli, P.;
Rauw, G.;
Read, A.;
Regibo, S.;
Reylé, C.;
Ribeiro, R. A.;
Rimoldini, L.;
Ripepi, V.;
Riva, A.;
Rixon, G.;
Roelens, M.;
Romero-Gómez, M.;
Rowell, N.;
Royer, F.;
Ruiz-Dern, L.;
Sadowski, G.;
Sellés, T. Sagristà;
Sahlmann, J.;
Salgado, J.;
Salguero, E.;
Sarasso, M.;
Savietto, H.;
Schultheis, M.;
Sciacca, E.;
Segol, M.;
Segovia, J. C.;
Segransan, D.;
Shih, I-C.;
Smareglia, R.;
Smart, R. L.;
Solano, E.;
Solitro, F.;
Sordo, R.;
Nieto, S. Soria;
Souchay, J.;
Spagna, A.;
Spoto, F.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I. A.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Stephenson, C. A.;
Stoev, H.;
Suess, F. F.;
Süveges, M.;
Surdej, J.;
Szabados, L.;
Szegedi-Elek, E.;
Tapiador, D.;
Taris, F.;
Tauran, G.;
Taylor, M. B.;
Teixeira, R.;
Terrett, D.;
Tingley, B.;
Trager, S. C.;
Turon, C.;
Ulla, A.;
Utrilla, E.;
Valentini, G.;
van Elteren, A.;
Van Hemelryck, E.;
van Leeuwen, M.;
Varadi, M.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Veljanoski, J.;
Via, T.;
Vicente, D.;
Vogt, S.;
Voss, H.;
Votruba, V.;
Voutsinas, S.;
Walmsley, G.;
Weiler, M.;
Weingril, K.;
Wevers, T.;
Wyrzykowski, Ł.;
Yoldas, A.;
Žerjal, M.;
Zucker, S.;
Zurbach, C.;
Zwitter, T.;
Alecu, A.;
Allen, M.;
Prieto, C. Allende;
Amorim, A.;
Anglada-Escudé, G.;
Arsenijevic, V.;
Azaz, S.;
Balm, P.;
Beck, M.;
Bernsteiny, H. -H.;
Bigot, L.;
Bijaoui, A.;
Blasco, C.;
Bonfigli, M.;
Bono, G.;
Boudreault, S.;
Bressan, A.;
Brown, S.;
Brunet, P. -M.;
Bunclarky, P.;
Buonanno, R.;
Butkevich, A. G.;
Carret, C.;
Carrion, C.;
Chemin, L.;
Chéreau, F.;
Corcione, L.;
Darmigny, E.;
de Boer, K. S.;
de Teodoro, P.;
de Zeeuw, P. T.;
Luche, C. Delle;
Domingues, C. D.;
Dubath, P.;
Fodor, F.;
Frézouls, B.;
Fries, A.;
Fustes, D.;
Fyfe, D.;
Gallardo, E.;
Gallegos, J.;
Gardio, D.;
Gebran, M.;
Gomboc, A.;
Gómez, A.;
Grux, E.;
Gueguen, A.;
Heyrovsky, A.;
Hoar, J.;
Iannicola, G.;
Parache, Y. Isasi;
Janotto, A. -M.;
Joliet, E.;
Jonckheere, A.;
Keil, R.;
Kim, D. -W.;
Klagyivik, P.;
Klar, J.;
Knude, J.;
Kochukhov, O.;
Kolka, I.;
Kos, J.;
Kutka, A.;
Lainey, V.;
LeBouquin, D.;
Liu, C.;
Loreggia, D.;
Makarov, V. V.;
Marseille, M. G.;
Martayan, C.;
Martinez-Rubi, O.;
Massart, B.;
Meynadier, F.;
Mignot, S.;
Munari, U.;
Nguyen, A. -T.;
Nordlander, T.;
O'Flaherty, K. S.;
Ocvirk, P.;
Sanz, A. Olias;
Ortiz, P.;
Osorio, J.;
Oszkiewicz, D.;
Ouzounis, A.;
Palmer, M.;
Park, P.;
Pasquato, E.;
Peltzer, C.;
Peralta, J.;
Péturaud, F.;
Pieniluoma, T.;
Pigozzi, E.;
Poelsy, J.;
Prat, G.;
Prod'homme, T.;
Raison, F.;
Rebordao, J. M.;
Risquez, D.;
Rocca-Volmerange, B.;
Rosen, S.;
Ruiz-Fuertes, M. I.;
Russo, F.;
Sembay, S.;
Vizcaino, I. Serraller;
Short, A.;
Siebert, A.;
Silva, H.;
Sinachopoulos, D.;
Slezak, E.;
Soffel, M.;
Sosnowska, D.;
Straižys, V.;
ter Linden, M.;
Terrell, D.;
Theil, S.;
Tiede, C.;
Troisi, L.;
Tsalmantza, P.;
Tur, D.;
Vaccari, M.;
Vachier, F.;
Valles, P.;
Van Hamme, W.;
Veltz, L.;
Virtanen, J.;
Wallut, J. -M.;
Wichmann, R.;
Wilkinson, M. I.;
Ziaeepour, H.;
Zschocke, S.
Submitted: 2017-03-03
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
[6]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.06031 [pdf] - 1557890
Performance of an Algorithm for Estimation of Flux, Background and
Location on One-Dimensional Signals
Submitted: 2017-02-20
Optimal estimation of signal amplitude, background level, and photocentre
location is crucial to the combined extraction of astrometric and photometric
information from focal plane images, and in particular from the one-dimensional
measurements performed by Gaia on intermediate to faint magnitude stars. Our
goal is to define a convenient maximum likelihood framework, suited to
efficient iterative implementation and to assessment of noise level, bias, and
correlation among variables. The analytical model is investigated numerically
and verified by simulation over a range of magnitude and background values. The
estimates are unbiased, with a well-understood correlation between amplitude
and background, and with a much lower correlation of either of them with
location, further alleviated in case of signal symmetry. Two versions of the
algorithm are implemented and tested against each other, respectively, for
independent and combined parameter estimation. Both are effective and provide
consistent results, but the latter is more efficient because it takes into
account the flux-background estimate correlation.
[7]
oai:arXiv.org:1702.04989 [pdf] - 1557887
The Short Term Stability of a Simulated Differential Astrometric
Reference Frame in the Gaia era
Submitted: 2017-02-16
We use methods of differential astrometry to construct a small field inertial
reference frame stable at the micro-arcsecond level. Such a high level of
astrometric precision can be expected with the end-of-mission standard errors
to be achieved with the Gaia space satellite using global astrometry. We
harness Gaia measurements of field angles and look at the influence of the
number of reference stars and the star's magnitude as well as astrometric
systematics on the total error budget with the help of Gaia-like simulations
around the Ecliptic Pole in a differential astrometric scenario. We find that
the systematic errors are modeled and reliably estimated to the $\mu$as level
even in fields with a modest number of 37 stars with G $<$13 mag over a 0.24
sq.degs. field of view for short time scales of the order of a day with
high-cadence observations such as those around the North Ecliptic Pole during
the EPSL scanning mode of Gaia for a perfect instrument. The inclusion of the
geometric instrument model over such short time scales accounting for
large-scale calibrations requires fainter stars down to G = 14 mag without
diminishing the accuracy of the reference frame. We discuss several future
perspectives of utilizing this methodology over different and longer
timescales.
[8]
oai:arXiv.org:1609.04303 [pdf] - 1523840
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million
proper motions and parallaxes
Lindegren, L.;
Lammers, U.;
Bastian, U.;
Hernández, J.;
Klioner, S.;
Hobbs, D.;
Bombrun, A.;
Michalik, D.;
Ramos-Lerate, M.;
Butkevich, A.;
Comoretto, G.;
Joliet, E.;
Holl, B.;
Hutton, A.;
Parsons, P.;
Steidelmüller, H.;
Abbas, U.;
Altmann, M.;
Andrei, A.;
Anton, S.;
Bach, N.;
Barache, C.;
Becciani, U.;
Berthier, J.;
Bianchi, L.;
Biermann, M.;
Bouquillon, S.;
Bourda, G.;
Brüsemeister, T.;
Bucciarelli, B.;
Busonero, D.;
Carlucci, T.;
Castañeda, J.;
Charlot, P.;
Clotet, M.;
Crosta, M.;
Davidson, M.;
de Felice, F.;
Drimmel, R.;
Fabricius, C.;
Fienga, A.;
Figueras, F.;
Fraile, E.;
Gai, M.;
Garralda, N.;
Geyer, R.;
González-Vidal, J. J.;
Guerra, R.;
Hambly, N. C.;
Hauser, M.;
Jordan, S.;
Lattanzi, M. G.;
Lenhardt, H.;
Liao, S.;
Löffler, W.;
McMillan, P. J.;
Mignard, F.;
Mora, A.;
Morbidelli, R.;
Portell, J.;
Riva, A.;
Sarasso, M.;
Serraller, I.;
Siddiqui, H.;
Smart, R.;
Spagna, A.;
Stampa, U.;
Steele, I.;
Taris, F.;
Torra, J.;
van Reeven, W.;
Vecchiato, A.;
Zschocke, S.;
de Bruijne, J.;
Gracia, G.;
Raison, F.;
Lister, T.;
Marchant, J.;
Messineo, R.;
Soffel, M.;
Osorio, J.;
de Torres, A.;
O'Mullane, W.
Submitted: 2016-09-14
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1
billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by
the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give
a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the
model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in
common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric
single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from
the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by
neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an
analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison
with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down
to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to
Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors
depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond
(mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to
~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is
aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than
0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03
mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the
Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the
nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the
quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what
is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent
a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical
definition of the optical reference frame.
[9]
oai:arXiv.org:1506.04501 [pdf] - 1176035
On the sensitivity of extracting the astrophysical cross section factor
of the 12C(a,g) reaction from existing data [Comment on Schuermann et al.
Phys. Lett. B711(2012)35]
Submitted: 2015-06-15
We address a conflicting report on the value and uncertainty of the
astrophysical cross section factor of the 12C(a,g) reaction extracted from
existing data. In sharp contrast to previously reported ambiguities (by up to a
factor 8), Schuermann et al. suggest an accuracy of 12%. We demonstrate that
the so claimed "rigorous data selection criteria" used by Schuermann et al.
relies on the s-factors extracted by Assuncao et al. But these results were
shown in a later analysis (by this author) to have large error bars
(considerably larger than claimed by Assuncao em et al.) which render these
data not appropriate for a rigorous analysis. When their "rigorous data
selection" is adjusted to remove the results of Assuncao et al. the
astrophysical cross section factor cannot be extracted with 12% accuracy, or
even close to it. Such data on the S_E2 values at low energies deviate by up to
a factor two from their fit and exhibit a sharper slope rising toward low
energies, leading to strong doubt on their extrapolated S_E2(300) value and the
quoted small error bar. Contrary to their claim the small value of S_E1(300)
~10 keVb cannot be ruled out by current data including the most modern
gamma-ray data. As previously observed by several authors current data reveal
ambiguities in the value of S_E1(300) ~10 keVb or ~80 keVb, and the new
ambiguity that was recently revealed (by this author) of S_E2(300) ~60 keVb or
~154 keVb, appear to be a more reasonable evaluation the status of current
data.
[10]
oai:arXiv.org:1408.0693 [pdf] - 860427
Application of algorithms for high precision metrology
Submitted: 2014-08-04
This paper evaluates the performance of algorithms suitable to process the
measurements from two laser beam metrology systems, in particular with
reference to the Gaia Basic Angle Monitoring device. The system and signal
characteristics are reviewed in order to define the key operating features. The
low-level algorithms are defined according to different approaches, starting
with a simple, model free method, and progressing to a strategy based on the
signal template and variance. The signal model is derived from measured data
sets. The performance at micro-arcsec level is verified by simulation in
conditions ranging from noiseless to large perturbations.
[11]
oai:arXiv.org:1406.3611 [pdf] - 836439
Astrometric detection feasibility of gravitational effects of quantum
vacuum
Submitted: 2014-06-13, last modified: 2014-06-16
This work analyzes in some detail the feasibility of testing with astrometric
measurements the hypothesis that Quantum Vacuum can have gravitational effects,
as suggested in a series of recent papers ([3, 6, 5]). In particular, the
possibility of detecting an excess shift of the longitude of the pericenter in
the orbit of the trans-neptunian system UX25 and its satellite is investigated.
The excess shift which might be experimented by the orbit of the satellite was
estimated, under reasonable working hypothesis, to be about 0:23 arcsec per
orbit. Several observing scenarios are explored here, including those using
conventional and adaptive optics telescopes from ground, and some spaceborne
telescopes.
[12]
oai:arXiv.org:1405.7119 [pdf] - 828531
Nuclear Structure and the Fate of Core Collapse (Type II) Supernova
Submitted: 2014-05-28
For a long time Gerry Brown and his collaborator Hans Bethe considered the
question of the final fate of a core collapse (Type II) supernova. Recalling
ideas from nuclear structure on Kaon condensate and a soft equation of state of
the dense nuclear matter they concluded that progenitor stars with mass as low
a 17-18M$_\odot$ (including supernova 1987A) could collapse to a small mass
black hole with a mass just beyond 1.5M$_\odot$, the upper bound they derive
for a neutron star. We discuss another nuclear structure effect that determines
the carbon to oxygen ratio (C/O) at the end of helium burning. This ratio also
determines the fate of a Type II supernova with a carbon rich progenitor star
producing a neutron star and oxygen rich collapsing to a black hole. While the
C/O ratio is one of the most important nuclear input to stellar evolution it is
still not known with sufficient accuracy. We discuss future efforts to measure
with gamma-beam and TPC detector the 12C(a,g)16O reaction that determines the
C/O ratio in stellar helium burning.
[13]
oai:arXiv.org:1312.3159 [pdf] - 805880
Astrometric tests of General Relativity in the Solar System:
mathematical and computational scenarios
Submitted: 2013-12-11
We review the mathematical models available for relativistic astrometry,
discussing the different approaches and their accuracies in the context of the
modern experiments from space like Gaia and GAME, and we show how these models
can be applied to the real world, and their consequences from the mathematical
and numerical point of view, with specific reference to the case of Gaia, whose
launch is due before the end of the year.
[14]
oai:arXiv.org:1311.1038 [pdf] - 755143
Ambiguities of the Rate of Oxygen Formation During Stellar Helium
Burning in the 12C(a,g) Reaction
Submitted: 2013-11-05, last modified: 2013-11-08
The rate of oxygen formation determines the C/O ratio during stellar helium
burning. It is the single most important nuclear input of stellar evolution
theory including the evolution of Type II and Type Ia supernova. Yet the low
energy cross section of the fusion of 4He + 12C denoted as the 12C(a,g)16O
reaction still remains uncertain after forty years of extensive work. We
analyze and critically review the most recent measurements of complete angular
distributions of the outgoing gamma-rays at very low energies (Ecm > 1.0 MeV).
Our analysis of the angular distribution measured with the EUROGAM/GANDI arrays
lead us to conclude considerably larger error bars than published hence they
are excluded from the current sample of "world data". We show that the current
sample of "world data" of the measured E2 cross section factors below 1.7 MeV
cluster to two distinct groups that lead to two distinct extrapolations of
SE2(300) ~ 60 or ~ 154 keVb. We point to a much neglected discrepancy between
the measured E1-E2 phase difference (phi_12) and unitarity as required by the
Watson theorem, suggesting systematic problem(s) of some of the measured
gamma-ray angular distributions. The ambiguity of the extrapolated SE2(300)
together with a previously observed ambiguity of SE1(300) represent the current
state of the art of the field and they must be resolved by future measurements
of complete and detailed angular distributions of the 12C(a,g) reaction at very
low energies (Ecm < 1.0 MeV).
[15]
oai:arXiv.org:1305.4086 [pdf] - 664921
Statistically optimal fitting of astrometric signals
Submitted: 2013-05-17
A general purpose fitting model for one-dimensional astrometric signals is
developed, building on a maximum likelihood framework, and its performance is
evaluated by simulation over a set of realistic image instances. The fit
quality is analysed as a function of the number of terms used for signal
expansion, and of astrometric error, rather than RMS discrepancy with respect
to the input signal. The tuning of the function basis to the statistical
characteristics of the signal ensemble is discussed. The fit sensitivity to a
priori knowledge of the source spectra is addressed. Some implications of the
current results on calibration and data reduction aspects are discussed, in
particular with respect to Gaia.
[16]
oai:arXiv.org:1303.4326 [pdf] - 1165339
Unambiguous Identification of the Second 2+ State in 12C and the
Structure of the Hoyle State
Zimmerman, W. R.;
Ahmed, M. W.;
Bromberger, B.;
Stave, S. C.;
Breskin, A.;
Dangendorf, V.;
Delbar, Th.;
Gai, M.;
Henshaw, S. S.;
Mueller, J. M.;
Sun, C.;
Tittelmeier, K.;
Weller, H. R.;
Wu, Y. K.
Submitted: 2013-03-18
The second 2+ state of 12C, predicted over fifty years ago as an excitation
of the Hoyle state, has been unambiguously identified using the 12C(g,a_0)8Be
reaction. The alpha particles produced by the photodisintegration of 12C were
detected using an Optical Time Projection Chamber (O-TPC). Data were collected
at beam energies between 9.1 and 10.7 MeV using the intense nearly
mono-energetic gamma-ray beams at the HIgS facility. The measured angular
distributions determine the cross section and the E1-E2 relative phases as a
function of energy leading to an unambiguous identification of the second 2+
state in 12C at 10.03(11) MeV, with a total width of 800(130) keV and a ground
state gamma-decay width of 60(10) meV; B(E2: 2+ ---> gs) = 0.73(13) e2fm4 [or
0.45(8) W.u.]. The Hoyle state and its rotational 2+ state that are more
extended than the ground state of 12C presents a challenge and constraints for
models attempting to reveal the nature of three alpha particle states in 12C.
Specifically it challenges the ab-initio Lattice Effective Field Theory (L-EFT)
calculations that predict similar r.m.s. radii for the ground state and the
Hoyle state.
[17]
oai:arXiv.org:1203.5654 [pdf] - 516478
Gravitation Astrometric Measurement Experiment
Submitted: 2012-03-26
The Gravitation Astrometric Measurement Experiment (GAME) is a mission
concept based on astronomical techniques (astrometry and coronagraphy) for
Fundamental Physics measurements, namely the \gamma\ and \beta\ parameters of
the Parametrized Post-Newtonian formulation of gravitation theories extending
the General Relativity. The science case also addresses cosmology, extra-solar
planets, Solar system objects and fundamental stellar parameters. The mission
concept is described, including the measurement approach and the instrument
design.
[18]
oai:arXiv.org:1105.2740 [pdf] - 359138
Systematic error mitigation in multiple field astrometry
Submitted: 2011-05-13
Combination of more than two fields provides constraints on the systematic
error of simultaneous observations. The concept is investigated in the context
of the Gravitation Astrometric Measurement Experiment (GAME), which aims at
measurement of the PPN parameter $\gamma$ at the $10^{-7}-10^{-8}$ level.
Robust self-calibration and control of systematic error is crucial to the
achievement of the precision goal.
The present work is focused on the concept investigation and practical
implementation strategy of systematic error control over four simultaneously
observed fields, implementing a "double differential" measurement technique.
Some basic requirements on geometry, observing and calibration strategy are
derived, discussing the fundamental characteristics of the proposed concept.
[19]
oai:arXiv.org:1101.1940 [pdf] - 288646
An Optical Readout TPC (O-TPC) for Studies in Nuclear Astrophysics With
Gamma-Ray Beams at HIgS
Gai, M.;
Ahmed, M. W.;
Stave, S. C.;
Zimmerman, W. R.;
Breskin, A.;
Bromberger, B.;
Chechik, R.;
Dangendorf, V.;
Delbar, Th.;
France, R. H.;
Henshaw, S. S.;
Kading, T. J.;
Martel, P. P.;
McDonald, J. E. R.;
Seo, P. -N.;
Tittelmeier, K.;
Weller, H. R.;
Young, A. H.
Submitted: 2011-01-10
We report on the construction, tests, calibrations and commissioning of an
Optical Readout Time Projection Chamber (O-TPC) detector operating with a
CO2(80%) + N2(20%) gas mixture at 100 and 150 Torr. It was designed to measure
the cross sections of several key nuclear reactions involved in stellar
evolution. In particular, a study of the rate of formation of oxygen and carbon
during the process of helium burning will be performed by exposing the chamber
gas to intense nearly mono-energetic gamma-ray beams at the High Intensity
Gamma Source (HIgS) facility. The O-TPC has a sensitive target-drift volume of
30x30x21 cm^3. Ionization electrons drift towards a double parallel grid
avalanche multiplier, yielding charge multiplication and light emission.
Avalanche induced photons from N2 emission are collected, intensified and
recorded with a Charge Coupled Device (CCD) camera, providing two-dimensional
track images. The event's time projection (third coordinate) and the deposited
energy are recorded by photomultipliers and by the TPC charge-signal,
respectively. A dedicated VME-based data acquisition system and associated data
analysis tools were developed to record and analyze these data. The O-TPC has
been tested and calibrated with 3.183 MeV alpha-particles emitted by a 148Gd
source placed within its volume with a measured energy resolution of 3.0%.
Tracks of alpha and 12C particles from the dissociation of 16O and of three
alpha-particles from the dissociation of 12C have been measured during initial
in-beam test experiments performed at the HIgS facility at Duke University. The
full detection system and its performance are described and the results of the
preliminary in-beam test experiments are reported.
[20]
oai:arXiv.org:1004.2318 [pdf] - 669480
Solar fusion cross sections II: the pp chain and CNO cycles
Adelberger, E. G.;
Balantekin, A. B.;
Bemmerer, D.;
Bertulani, C. A.;
Chen, J. -W.;
Costantini, H.;
Couder, M.;
Cyburt, R.;
Davids, B.;
Freedman, S. J.;
Gai, M.;
Garcia, A.;
Gazit, D.;
Gialanella, L.;
Greife, U.;
Hass, M.;
Heeger, K.;
Haxton, W. C.;
Imbriani, G.;
Itahashi, T.;
Junghans, A.;
Kubodera, K.;
Langanke, K.;
Leitner, D.;
Leitner, M.;
Marcucci, L. E.;
Motobayashi, T.;
Mukhamedzhanov, A.;
Nollett, Kenneth M.;
Nunes, F. M.;
Park, T. -S.;
Parker, P. D.;
Prati, P.;
Ramsey-Musolf, M. J.;
Robertson, R. G. Hamish;
Schiavilla, R.;
Simpson, E. C.;
Snover, K. A.;
Spitaleri, C.;
Strieder, F.;
Suemmerer, K.;
Trautvetter, H. -P.;
Tribble, R. E.;
Typel, S.;
Uberseder, E.;
Vetter, P.;
Wiescher, M.;
Winslow, L.
Submitted: 2010-04-14, last modified: 2010-10-10
We summarize and critically evaluate the available data on nuclear fusion
cross sections important to energy generation in the Sun and other
hydrogen-burning stars and to solar neutrino production. Recommended values and
uncertainties are provided for key cross sections, and a recommended spectrum
is given for 8B solar neutrinos. We also discuss opportunities for further
increasing the precision of key rates, including new facilities, new
experimental techniques, and improvements in theory. This review, which
summarizes the conclusions of a workshop held at the Institute for Nuclear
Theory, Seattle, in January 2009, is intended as a 10-year update and
supplement to Reviews of Modern Physics 70 (1998) 1265.
[21]
oai:arXiv.org:1007.1455 [pdf] - 200714
A decline and fall in the future of Italian Astronomy?
Antonelli, Angelo;
Antonuccio-Delogu, Vincenzo;
Baruffolo, Andrea;
Benetti, Stefano;
Bianchi, Simone;
Biviano, Andrea;
Bonafede, Annalisa;
Bondi, Marco;
Borgani, Stefano;
Bragaglia, Angela;
Brescia, Massimo;
Brucato, John Robert;
Brunetti, Gianfranco;
Brunino, Riccardo;
Cantiello, Michele;
Casasola, Viviana;
Cassano, Rossella;
Cellino, Alberto;
Cescutti, Gabriele;
Cimatti, Andrea;
Comastri, Andrea;
Corbelli, Edvige;
Cresci, Giovanni;
Criscuoli, Serena;
Cristiani, Stefano;
Cupani, Guido;
De Grandi, Sabrina;
D'Elia, Valerio;
Del Santo, Melania;
De Lucia, Gabriella;
Desidera, Silvano;
Di Criscienzo, Marcella;
D'Odorico, Valentina;
Dotto, Elisabetta;
Fontanot, Fabio;
Gai, Mario;
Gallerani, Simona;
Gallozzi, Stefano;
Garilli, Bianca;
Gioia, Isabella;
Girardi, Marisa;
Gitti, Myriam;
Granato, Gianluigi;
Gratton, Raffaele;
Grazian, Andrea;
Gruppioni, Carlotta;
Hunt, Leslie;
Leto, Giuseppe;
Israel, Gianluca;
Magliocchetti, Manuela;
Magrini, Laura;
Mainetti, Gabriele;
Mannucci, Filippo;
Marconi, Alessandro;
Marelli, Martino;
Maris, Michele;
Matteucci, Francesca;
Meneghetti, Massimo;
Mennella, Aniello;
Mercurio, Amata;
Molendi, Silvano;
Monaco, Pierluigi;
Moretti, Alessia;
Murante, Giuseppe;
Nicastro, Fabrizio;
Orio, Marina;
Paizis, Adamantia;
Panessa, Francesca;
Pasian, Fabio;
Pentericci, Laura;
Pozzetti, Lucia;
Rossetti, Mariachiara;
Santos, Joana S.;
Saro, Alexandro;
Schneider, Raffaella;
Silva, Laura;
Silvotti, Roberto;
Smart, Richard;
Tiengo, Andrea;
Tornatore, Luca;
Tozzi, Paolo;
Trussoni, Edoardo;
Valentinuzzi, Tiziano;
Vanzella, Eros;
Vazza, Franco;
Vecchiato, Alberto;
Venturi, Tiziana;
Vianello, Giacomo;
Viel, Matteo;
Villalobos, Alvaro;
Viotto, Valentina;
Vulcani, Benedetta
Submitted: 2010-07-08
On May 27th 2010, the Italian astronomical community learned with concern
that the National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF) was going to be suppressed,
and that its employees were going to be transferred to the National Research
Council (CNR). It was not clear if this applied to all employees (i.e. also to
researchers hired on short-term contracts), and how this was going to happen in
practice. In this letter, we give a brief historical overview of INAF and
present a short chronicle of the few eventful days that followed. Starting from
this example, we then comment on the current situation and prospects of
astronomical research in Italy.
[22]
oai:arXiv.org:0809.4152 [pdf] - 16676
Astrometric effects of non-uniform telescope throughput
Submitted: 2008-09-24
In real telescopes, the optical parameters evolve with time, and the
degradation is often not uniform. This introduces variations in the image
profile and therefore photo-centre displacements which, unless corrected, may
result in astrometric errors. The effects induced on individual telescopes and
interferometric arrays are derived by numerical implementation of a range of
cases. The results are evaluated with respect to the potential impact on the
most relevant experiments for high precision astrometry in the near future,
i.e. Gaia, PRIMA and SIM, and to mitigation techniques applicable from design
stage to calibrations.
[23]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.3403 [pdf] - 14728
System overview of the VLTI Spectro-Imager
Jocou, L.;
Berger, J. P.;
Malbet, F.;
Kern, P.;
Beckmann, U.;
Lorenzetti, D.;
Corcione, L.;
Causi, G. Li;
Buscher, D.;
Young, J.;
Gai, M.;
Weigelt, G.;
Zins, G.;
Duvert, G.;
Perraut, K.;
Labeye, P.;
Absil, O.;
Garcia, P.;
Loreggia, D.;
Lima, J.;
Rebordao, J.;
Ligori, S.;
Amorim, A.;
Rabou, P.;
Bouquin, J. B. Le;
Haniff, C.;
Coarer, E. Le;
Feautrier, P.;
Duchene, G.;
Benisty, M.;
Chelli, A.;
Herwats, E.;
Delboulbe, A.
Submitted: 2008-07-22
The VLTI Spectro Imager project aims to perform imaging with a temporal
resolution of 1 night and with a maximum angular resolution of 1
milliarcsecond, making best use of the Very Large Telescope Interferometer
capabilities. To fulfill the scientific goals (see Garcia et. al.), the system
requirements are: a) combining 4 to 6 beams; b) working in spectral bands J, H
and K; c) spectral resolution from R= 100 to 12000; and d) internal fringe
tracking on-axis, or off-axis when associated to the PRIMA dual-beam facility.
The concept of VSI consists on 6 sub-systems: a common path distributing the
light between the fringe tracker and the scientific instrument, the fringe
tracker ensuring the co-phasing of the array, the scientific instrument
delivering the interferometric observables and a calibration tool providing
sources for internal alignment and interferometric calibrations. The two
remaining sub-systems are the control system and the observation support
software dedicated to the reduction of the interferometric data. This paper
presents the global concept of VSI science path including the common path, the
scientific instrument and the calibration tool. The scientific combination
using a set of integrated optics multi-way beam combiners to provide
high-stability visibility and closure phase measurements are also described.
Finally we will address the performance budget of the global VSI instrument.
The fringe tracker and scientific spectrograph will be shortly described.
[24]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.1642 [pdf] - 14389
Fringe Tracker for the VLTI Spectro-Imager
Submitted: 2008-07-10
The implementation of the simultaneous combination of several telescopes
(from four to eight) available at Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI)
will allow the new generation interferometric instrumentation to achieve
interferometric image synthesis with unprecedented resolution and efficiency.
The VLTI Spectro Imager (VSI) is the proposed second-generation near-infrared
multi-beam instrument for the Very Large Telescope Interferometer, featuring
three band operations (J, H and K), high angular resolutions (down to 1.1
milliarcsecond) and high spectral resolutions. VSI will be equipped with its
own internal Fringe Tracker (FT), which will measure and compensate the
atmospheric perturbations to the relative beam phase, and in turn will provide
stable and prolonged observing conditions down to the magnitude K=13 for the
scientific combiner. In its baseline configuration, VSI FT is designed to
implement, from the very start, the minimum redundancy combination in a nearest
neighbor scheme of six telescopes over six baselines, thus offering better
options for rejection of large intensity or phase fluctuations over each beam,
due to the symmetric set-up. The planar geometry solution of the FT beam
combiner is devised to be easily scalable either to four or eight telescopes,
in accordance to the three phase development considered for VSI. The proposed
design, based on minimum redundancy combination and bulk optics solution, is
described in terms of opto-mechanical concept, performance and key operational
aspects.
[25]
oai:arXiv.org:0807.1062 [pdf] - 14268
VSI: the VLTI spectro-imager
Malbet, F.;
Buscher, D.;
Weigelt, G.;
Garcia, P.;
Gai, M.;
Lorenzetti, D.;
Surdej, J.;
Hron, J.;
Neuhaeuser, R.;
Kern, P.;
Jocou, L.;
Berger, J. -P.;
Absil, O.;
Beckmann, U.;
Corcione, L.;
Duvert, G.;
Filho, M.;
Labeye, P.;
Coarer, E. Le;
Causi, G. Li;
Lima, J.;
Perraut, K.;
Tatulli, E.;
Thiebaut, E.;
Young, J.;
Zins, G.;
Amorim, A.;
Aringer, B.;
Beckert, T.;
Benisty, M.;
Bonfils, X.;
Cabral, A.;
Chelli, A.;
Chesneau, O.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Corradi, R.;
de Becker, M.;
Delboulbe, A.;
Duchene, G.;
Forveille, T.;
Haniff, C.;
Herwats, E.;
Hofmann, K. -H.;
Bouquin, J. -B. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Loreggia, D.;
Marconi, A.;
Moitinho, A.;
Nisini, B.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Rebordao, J.;
Speziali, R.;
Testi, L.;
Vitali, F.
Submitted: 2008-07-07
The VLTI Spectro Imager (VSI) was proposed as a second-generation instrument
of the Very Large Telescope Interferometer providing the ESO community with
spectrally-resolved, near-infrared images at angular resolutions down to 1.1
milliarcsecond and spectral resolutions up to R=12000. Targets as faint as K=13
will be imaged without requiring a brighter nearby reference object. The unique
combination of high-dynamic-range imaging at high angular resolution and high
spectral resolution enables a scientific program which serves a broad user
community and at the same time provides the opportunity for breakthroughs in
many areas of astrophysic including: probing the initial conditions for planet
formation in the AU-scale environments of young stars; imaging convective cells
and other phenomena on the surfaces of stars; mapping the chemical and physical
environments of evolved stars, stellar remnants, and stellar winds; and
disentangling the central regions of active galactic nuclei and supermassive
black holes. VSI will provide these new capabilities using technologies which
have been extensively tested in the past and VSI requires little in terms of
new infrastructure on the VLTI. At the same time, VSI will be able to make
maximum use of new infrastructure as it becomes available; for example, by
combining 4, 6 and eventually 8 telescopes, enabling rapid imaging through the
measurement of up to 28 visibilities in every wavelength channel within a few
minutes. The current studies are focused on a 4-telescope version with an
upgrade to a 6-telescope one. The instrument contains its own fringe tracker
and tip-tilt control in order to reduce the constraints on the VLTI
infrastructure and maximize the scientific return.
[26]
oai:arXiv.org:0801.2694 [pdf] - 9115
Milli-arcsecond astrophysics with VSI, the VLTI spectro-imager in the
ELT era
Malbet, F.;
Buscher, D.;
Weigelt, G.;
Garcia, P.;
Gai, M.;
Lorenzetti, D.;
Surdej, J.;
Hron, J.;
Neuhäuser, R.;
Kern, P.;
Jocou, L.;
Berger, J. -P.;
Absil, O.;
Beckmann, U.;
Corcione, L.;
Duvert, G.;
Filho, M.;
Labeye, P.;
Coarer, E. Le;
Causi, G. Li;
Lima, J.;
Perraut, K.;
Tatulli, E.;
Thiébaut, E.;
Young, J.;
Zins, G.;
Amorim, A.;
Aringer, B.;
Beckert, T.;
Benisty, M.;
Bonfils, X.;
Chelli, A.;
Chesneau, O.;
Chiavassa, A.;
Corradi, R.;
De Becker, M.;
Delboulbé, A.;
Duchêne, G.;
Forveille, T.;
Haniff, C.;
Herwats, E.;
Bouquin, J. -B. Le;
Ligori, S.;
Loreggia, D.;
Marconi, A.;
Moitinho, A.;
Nisini, B.;
Petrucci, P. -O.;
Rebordao, J.;
Speziali, R.;
Testi, L.;
Vitali, F.
Submitted: 2008-01-17
Nowadays, compact sources like surfaces of nearby stars, circumstellar
environments of stars from early stages to the most evolved ones and
surroundings of active galactic nuclei can be investigated at milli-arcsecond
scales only with the VLT in its interferometric mode. We propose a
spectro-imager, named VSI (VLTI spectro-imager), which is capable to probe
these sources both over spatial and spectral scales in the near-infrared
domain. This instrument will provide information complementary to what is
obtained at the same time with ALMA at different wavelengths and the extreme
large telescopes.
[27]
oai:arXiv.org:0707.0687 [pdf] - 1579251
The Dissociation of 8B in the Coulomb Field and the Validity of the CD
Method
Submitted: 2007-07-04
The GSI1, GSI2 (as well as the RIKEN2 and the corrected GSI2) measurements of
the Coulomb Dissociation (CD) of 8B are in good agreement with the most recent
Direct Capture (DC) 7Be(p,g)8B reaction measurement performed at Weizmann and
in agreement with the Seattle result. Yet it was claimed that the CD and DC
results are sufficiently different and need to be reconciled. We show that
these statements arise from a misunderstanding (as well as misrepresentation)
of CD experiments. We recall a similar strong statement questioning the
validity of the CD method due to an invoked large E2 component that was also
shown to arise from a misunderstanding of the CD method. In spite of the good
agreement between DC and CD data the slope of the astrophysical cross section
factor (S17) can not be extracted with high accuracy due to a discrepancy
between the recent DC data as well as a discrepancy of the three reports of the
GSI CD data. The slope is directly related to the d-wave component that
dominates at higher energies and must be subtracted from measured data to
extrapolate to zero energy. Hence the uncertainty of the measured slope leads
to an additional uncertainty of the extrapolated zero energy cross section
factor, S17(0). This uncertainty must be alleviated by future experiments to
allow a precise determination of S17(0), a goal that so far has not be achieved
in spite of strong statement(s) that appeared in the literature.
[28]
oai:arXiv.org:0706.1106 [pdf] - 2001
Toward Application of a Thick Gas Electron Multiplier (THGEM) Readout
for a Dark Matter Detector
Submitted: 2007-06-07
The Yale-Weizmann collaboration aims to develop a low-radioactivity
(low-background) cryogenic noble liquid detector for Dark-Matter (DM) search in
measurements to be performed deep underground as for example carried out by the
XENON collaboration. A major issue is the background induced by natural
radioactivity of present-detector components including the Photo Multiplier
Tubes (PMT) made from glass with large U-Th content. We propose to use advanced
Thick Gaseous Electron Multipliers (THGEM) recently developed at the Weizmann
Institute of Science (WIS). These "hole-multipliers" will measure in a
two-phase (liquid/gas) Xe detector electrons extracted into the gas phase from
both ionization in the liquid as well as scintillation-induced photoelectrons
from a CsI photocathode immersed in LXe. We report on initial tests (in gas) of
THGEM made out of Cirlex (Kapton) which is well known to have low Ra-Th content
instead of the usual G10 material with high Ra-Th content.
[29]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0703071 [pdf] - 89880
An efficient PSF construction method
Submitted: 2007-03-05
Image computation is a fundamental tool for performance assessment of
astronomical instrumentation, usually implemented by Fourier transform
techniques. We review the numerical implementation, evaluating a direct
implementation of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) algorithm, compared with
fast Fourier transform (FFT) tools. Simulations show that the precision is
quite comparable, but in the case investigated the computing performance is
considerably higher for DFT than FFT. The application to image simulation for
the mission Gaia and for Extremely Large Telescopes is discussed.
[30]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0702294 [pdf] - 89348
A simple beam combination for stellar interferometry
Submitted: 2007-02-11
In stellar interferometry, image quality improves significantly with the
inclusion of more telescopes and the use of phase closure. We demonstrate,
using first coherent and then partially coherent white light, a compact and
efficient pair-wise combination of twelve or more beams. The input beams are
lined up and spread through a cylindrical lens into a comb of parallel
ellipses, which interferes with a perpendicular copy of itself to form a matrix
of interferograms between all pairs. The diagonal elements show interference of
each beam with itself, for in-tensity calibration. The measured white-light
visibilities were high and stable.
[31]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0702018 [pdf] - 118493
A Further Measurement of the beta-Delayed alpha-Particle Emission of 16N
Submitted: 2007-02-08
We measured the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission spectrum of 16N with a
sensitivity for beta-decay branching ratios of the order of 10-10. The 16N
nuclei were produced using the d(15N,16N)p reaction with 70 MeV 15N beams and a
deuterium gas target 7.5 cm long at a pressure of 1250 torr. The 16N nuclei
were collected (over 10 s) using a thin aluminum foil with an areal density of
180 mu g/cm2 tilted at 7 Deg with respect to the beam. The activity was
transferred to the counting area by means of a stepping motor in less than 3 s
with the counting carried out over 8 s. The beta-delayed alpha-particles were
measured using a time of flight method to achieve a sufficiently low
background. Standard calibration sources (148Gd, 241Am, 208,209Po, and 227Ac)
as well as alpha-particles and 7Li from the 10B(n,alpha)7Li reaction were used
for an accurate energy calibration. The energy resolution of the catcher foil
(180-220 keV) was calculated and the time of flight resolution (3-10 nsec) was
measured using the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission from 8Li that was
produced using the d(7Li,8Li)p reaction with the same setup. The line shape was
corrected to account for the variation in the energy and time resolution and a
high statistics spectrum of the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of 16N is
reported. However, our data (as well as earlier Mainz data and unpublished
Seattle data) do not agree with an earlier measurement of the beta-delayed
alpha-particle emission of 16N taken at TRIUMF after averaging over the energy
resolution of our collection system. This disagreement, amongst other issues,
prohibits accurate inclusion of the f-wave component in the R-matrix analysis.
[32]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0608027 [pdf] - 118485
In Beam Tests of Implanted Helium Targets
McDonald, J. E.;
France, R. H.;
Jarvis, R. A.;
Ahmed, M. W.;
Blackston, M. A.;
Delbar, Th.;
Gai, M.;
Kading, T. J.;
Parpottas, Y.;
Perdue, B. A.;
Prior, R. M.;
Rubin, D. A.;
Spraker, M. C.;
Yeomans, J. D.;
Weissman, L.;
Weller, H. R.;
Wilds, E. L.;
;
;
UHartford;
GCSU;
LNS/UConn;
TUNL/Duke;
UCL/LLN;
Yale;
NGCSU
Submitted: 2006-08-16
Targets consisting of 3,4He implanted into thin aluminum foils (approximately
100, 200 or 600 ug/cm^2) were prepared using intense (a few uA) helium beams at
low energy (approximately 20, 40 or 100 keV). Uniformity of the implantation
was achieved by a beam raster across a 12 mm diameter tantalum collimator at
the rates of 0.1 Hz in the vertical direction and 1 Hz in the horizontal
direction. Helium implantation into the very thin (approximately 80-100
ug/cm^2) aluminum foils failed to produce useful targets (with only
approximately 10% of the helium retained) due to an under estimation of the
range by the code SRIM. The range of low energy helium in aluminum predicted by
Northcliffe and Shilling and the NIST online tabulation are observed on the
other hand to over estimate the range of low energy helium ions in aluminum. An
attempt to increase the amount of helium by implanting a second deeper layer
was also carried out, but it did not significantly increase the helium content
beyond the blistering limit (approximately 6 x 10^17 helium/cm^2). The
implanted targets were bombarded with moderately intense 4He and 16O beams of
50-100 particle nA . Rutherford Back Scattering of 1.0 and 2.5 MeV proton beams
and recoil helium from 15.0 MeV oxygen beams were used to study the helium
content and profile before, during and after bombardments. We observed the
helium content and profile to be very stable even after a prolonged bombardment
(up to two days) with moderately intense beams of 16O or 4He. Helium implanted
into thin (aluminum) foils is a good choice for thin helium targets needed, for
example, for a measurement of the 3he(a,g)7Be reaction and the associated S34
astrophysical cross section factor (S-factor).
[33]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0607291 [pdf] - 1455137
VSI: a milli-arcsec spectro-imager for the VLTI
Malbet, Fabien;
Kern, Pierre;
Berger, Jean-Philippe;
Jocou, Laurent;
Garcia, Paulo;
Buscher, David;
Rousselet-Perraut, Karine;
Weigelt, Gerd;
Gai, Mario;
Surdej, Jean;
Hron, Josef;
Neuhäuser, Ralph;
Coarer, Etienne Le;
Labeye, Pierre;
Bouquin, Jean-Baptiste Le;
Benisty, Myriam;
Herwats, Emilie
Submitted: 2006-07-13
VLTi Spectro-Imager (VSI) is a proposition for a second generation VLTI
instrument which is aimed at providing the ESO community with the capability of
performing image synthesis at milli-arcsecond angular resolution. VSI provides
the VLTI with an instrument able to combine 4 telescopes in a baseline version
and optionally up to 6 telescopes in the near-infrared spectral domain with
moderate to high spectral resolution. The instrument contains its own fringe
tracker in order to relax the constraints onto the VLTI infrastructure. VSI
will do imaging at the milli-arcsecond scale with spectral resolution of: a)
the close environments of young stars probing the initial conditions for planet
formation; b) the surfaces of stars; c) the environment of evolved stars,
stellar remnants and stellar winds, and d) the central region of active
galactic nuclei and supermassive black holes. The science cases allowed us to
specify the astrophysical requirements of the instrument and to define the
necessary studies of the science group for phase A.
[34]
oai:arXiv.org:physics/0602188 [pdf] - 119148
Amplification and Scintillation Properties of Oxygen-Rich Gas Mixtures
for Optical-TPC Applications
Submitted: 2006-02-27, last modified: 2006-05-27
We studied electron amplification and light emission from avalanches in
oxygen-containing gas mixtures. The mixtures investigated in this work
included, among others, CO2 and N2O mixed with Triethylamine (TEA) or N2.
Double-Step Parallel Gap (DSPG) multipliers and THick Gas Electron Multipliers
(THGEM) were investigated. High light yields were measured from CO2+N2 and
CO2+TEA, though with different emission spectra. We observed the characteristic
wave-length emission of N2 and of TEA and used a polymer wave-length shifter to
convert TEA UV-light into the visible spectrum. The results of these
measurements indicate the applicability of optical recording of ionizing tracks
in a TPC target-detector designed to study the cross section of the 16O(g,a)12C
reaction, a central problem in nuclear astrophysics.
[35]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0605001 [pdf] - 118483
The Coulomb Dissociation of 8B; A Triumph of Good Science
Submitted: 2006-05-01
The GSI1, GSI2 (as well as the RIKEN2 and the corrected GSI2) measurements of
the Coulomb Dissociation (CD) of 8B are in good agreement with the most recent
Direct Capture (DC) 7Be(p,g)8B reaction measurement performed at Weizmann and
in agreement with the Seattle result. Yet it was claimed that the CD and DC
results are sufficiently different and need to be reconciled. We show that
these statements arise from a misunderstanding (as well as misrepresentation)
of CD experiments. We recall a similar strong statement questioning the
validity of the CD method due to an invoked large E2 component that was also
shown to arise from a misunderstanding of the CD method. In spite of the good
agreement between DC and CD data the slope of the astrophysical cross section
factor (S17) can not be extracted with high accuracy due to a discrepancy
between the recent DC data as well as a discrepancy of the three reports of the
GSI CD data. The slope is directly related to the d-wave component that
dominates at higher energies and must be subtracted from measured data to
extrapolate to zero energy. Hence the uncertainty of the measured slope leads
to an additional uncertainty of the extrapolated zero energy cross section
factor, S17(0). This uncertainty must be alleviated by future experiments to
allow a precise determination of S17(0), a goal that so far has not be achieved
in spite of strong statement(s) that appeared in the literature.
[36]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0511572 [pdf] - 77930
Chromaticity in all-reflective telescopes for astrometry
Submitted: 2005-11-18, last modified: 2005-12-15
Chromatic effects are usually associated with refractive optics, so
reflective telescopes are assumed to be free from them. We show that
all-reflective optics still bears significant levels of such perturbations,
which is especially critical to modern micro-arcsecond astrometric experiments.
We analyze the image formation and measurement process to derive a precise
definition of the chromatic variation of the image position, and we evaluate
the key aspects of optical design with respect to chromaticity. The fundamental
requirement related to chromaticity is the symmetry of the optical design and
of the wavefront errors. Finally, we address some optical engineering issues,
such as manufacturing and alignment, providing recommendations to minimize the
degradation that chromaticity introduces into astrometry.
[37]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0510081 [pdf] - 118477
Status of the Standard Solar Model Prediction of Solar Neutrino Fluxes
Submitted: 2005-10-30
The Standard Solar Model (BP04) predicts a total 8B neutrino flux that is
17.2% larger than measured in the salt phase of the SNO detector (and if it
were significant it will indicate oscillation to sterile neutrinos). Hence it
is important to examine in details uncertainties (and values) of inputs to the
SSM. Currently, the largest fractional uncertainty is due to the new evaluation
of the surface composition of the sun. We examine the nuclear input on the
formation of solar 8B [S17(0)] and demonstrate that it is still quite uncertain
due to ill known slope of the measured astrophysical cross section factor and
thus ill defined extrapolation to zero energy. This yields an additional
reasonably estimated uncertainty due to extrapolation of +0.0 -3.0 eV-b (+0%
-14%). Since a large discrepancy exists among measured as well as among
predicted slopes, the value of S17(0) is dependent on the choice of data and
theory used to extrapolate S17(0). This situation must be alleviated by new
measurement(s). The "world average" is driven by the Seattle result due to the
very small quoted uncertainty, which we however demonstrate it to be an
over-estimated accuracy. We propose more realistic error bars for the Seattle
results based on the published Seattle data.
[38]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507541 [pdf] - 74710
Neural network correction of astrometric chromaticity
Submitted: 2005-07-22
In this paper we deal with the problem of chromaticity, i.e. apparent
position variation of stellar images with their spectral distribution, using
neural networks to analyse and process astronomical images. The goal is to
remove this relevant source of systematic error in the data reduction of high
precision astrometric experiments, like Gaia. This task can be accomplished
thanks to the capability of neural networks to solve a nonlinear approximation
problem, i.e. to construct an hypersurface that approximates a given set of
scattered data couples. Images are encoded associating each of them with
conveniently chosen moments, evaluated along the y axis. The technique
proposed, in the current framework, reduces the initial chromaticity of few
milliarcseconds to values of few microarcseconds.
[39]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0502020 [pdf] - 118466
Is There a Significant Difference Between the Results of the Coulomb
Dissociation of 8B and the Direct Capture 7Be(p,g)8B Reaction?
Submitted: 2005-02-24, last modified: 2005-04-06
Recent claims of the Seattle group of evidence of "slope difference between
CD [Coulomb Dissociation] and direct [capture] results" are based on wrong and
selective data. When the RIKEN2 data are included correctly, and previously
published Direct Capture (DC) data are also included, we observe only a 1.9
sigma difference in the extracted so called "scale independent slope (b)",
considerably smaller than claimed by the Seattle group. The very
parameterization used by the Seattle group to extract the so called b-slope
parameter has no physical foundation. Considering the physical slope (S' =
dS/dE), we observe a 1.0 sigma agreement between slopes (S') measured in CD and
DC, refuting the need for new theoretical investigation. The claim that S17(0)
values extracted from CD data are approximately 10% lower than DC results, is
based on misunderstanding of the CD method. Considering all of the published CD
S17(0) results, with adding back an unconfirmed E2 correction of the MSU data,
yields very consistent S17(0) results that agree with recent DC measurements of
the Seattle and Weizmann groups. The recent correction of the b-slope parameter
(0.25 1/MeV) suggested by Esbensen, Bertsch and Snover was applied to the wrong
b-slope parameter calculated by the Seattle group. When considering the correct
slope of the RIKEN2 data, this correction in fact leads to a very small b-slope
parameter (0.14 1/MeV), less than half the central value observed for DC data,
refuting the need to correct the RIKEN2 data. In particular it confirms that
the E2 contribution in the RIKEN2 data is negligible. The dispersion of
measured S17(0) is mostly due to disagreement among individual DC experiments
and not due to either experimental or theoretical aspects of CD.
[40]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0504003 [pdf] - 118469
Optical Readout Time Projection Chamber (O-TPC) for a Study of Oxygen
Formation In Stellar Helium Burning
Submitted: 2005-04-01
We are developing an Optical Readout Time Projection Chamber (O-TPC) detector
for the study of the 12C(a,g)16O reaction that determines the ratio of carbon
to oxygen in helium burning. This ratio is crucial for understanding the final
fate of a progenitor star and the nucleosynthesis of elements prior to a Type
II supernova; an oxygen rich star is predicted to collapse to a black hole, and
a carbon rich star to a neutron star. Type Ia supernovae (SNeIa) are used as
standard candles for measuring cosmological distances with the use of an
empirical light curve-luminosity stretching factor. It is essential to
understand helium burning that yields the carbon/oxygen white dwarf and thus
the initial stage of SNeIa. The O-TPC is intended for use with high intensity
photon beams extracted from the HIgS/TUNL facility at Duke University to study
the 16O(g,a)12C reaction, and thus the direct reaction at energies as low as
0.7 MeV. We are conducting a systematical study of the best oxygen containing
gas with light emitting admixture(s) for use in such an O-TPC. Preliminary
results with CO_2 + TEA mixture were obtained
[41]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0410031 [pdf] - 118465
Do We Accurately Know the Formation of Solar 8B?
Submitted: 2004-10-20
A detailed examination of current data on S_17 (as opposed to an examination
of S_17(0) only) excludes quoting S_17(0) with sufficiently small uncertainty.
In contrast to suggestions that S_17(0) is now known with the accuracy of \pm
3%, the exact value of S_17(0) is dependent on the choice of the data and the
choice of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision
results (including the Seattle data) on S_17 which are in good agreement, still
differ on the measured slopes, as do theoretical models that predict different
d-wave contribution, precluding an accurate extrapolation to zero energy of the
consistent data. Using a common extrapolation of only the consistent high
precision data, suggests a value of S_17(0) = 21.2 \pm 0.5 eV-b, but a value
equal to or smaller than 19.0 eV-b can not be excluded due to the uncertainty
in the extrapolation, leading to an additional error of +0.0 -3.0 eV-b. This
(unacceptable) situation must be cleared by future experiments.
[42]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0312020 [pdf] - 118456
Comment on B. Davids et al.; Proton-Decaying States in 22Mg and the
Nucleosynthesis of 22Na in Novae
Submitted: 2003-12-18, last modified: 2004-09-14
B.S. Davids {\em et al.} make the explicit assumption that radiative widths
of analog states in \ne22 and \mg22 are equal. We demonstrate that this
misapplication of iso-spin symmetry leads to very wrong results. Considerations
of elementary nuclear structure suggests that such an assumption can be
inaccurate by a large factor (in \mg22), as is evident from a comparison with
recent measurements of radiative width in \mg22. Estimates of radiative widths
from analog transitions are common but often wrong (e.g. in \mg22) and should
not be considered a useful tool in nuclear astrophysics.
[43]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0405100 [pdf] - 64620
(Two) Open Questions in Stellar Nuclear Physics
Submitted: 2004-05-06
No doubt, among the most exciting discoveries of the third millennium thus
far are {\bf Oscillations of Massive Neutrinos} and {\bf Dark Energy} that
leads to an accelerated expansion of the Universe. Accordingly, Nuclear Physics
is presented with two extraordinary challenges: the need for precise (5% or
better) prediction of solar neutrino fluxes within the Standard Solar Model,
and the need for an accurate (5% or better) understanding of stellar evolution
and in particular of Type Ia super nova that are used as cosmological standard
candle. In contrast, much confusion is found in the field with contradicting
data and strong statements of accuracy that can not be supported by current
data. We discuss an experimental program to address these challenges and
disagreements.
[44]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0404022 [pdf] - 118460
The Coulomb Dissociation of 8B and a Critical Assessment of the Seattle
S17(0) Result
Submitted: 2004-04-17
The Coulomb dissociation of 8B, measured with high precision by the GSI
group, is in excellent agreement with the astrophysical cross section factor
(S17) measured by the Weizmann group with a 7Be target. The GSI and Weizmann
data are in good agreement with the Seattle data at high energies, but at low
energies we observe a slight systematic (up to 2sigma) deviation, yet the
Seattle group repeatedly rejects the CD method. We show that when plotting the
slopes, they mis plotted one CD data point and exclude measured slopes that
contradict their claim. Indeed the measured slope is essential to elucidate the
d-wave correction to S17(0) that could be as large as 15%, and is the last open
question that needs to be resolved before S17(0) can be quoted with an accuracy
of 5% or better. We show that this goal has not been achieved (in spite of the
strong claim of the Seattle group), since currently there is no agreement among
experiments as well as among theoretical models on the value of the slope. In
addition, currently there is no theoretical framework within which (for example
the Seattle) data can be analyzed and S17(0) extrapolated with the claimed high
precision of 2.5%. This (last) issue of the slope and the d-wave correction
must be resolved (by future measurements) so as to allow quoting S17(0) with an
accuracy of 5% or better.
[45]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0312003 [pdf] - 118454
How Accurately Do We Know the Formation of Solar 8B?
Submitted: 2003-12-01, last modified: 2004-02-09
The large value of \S17 = 22.1 \xpm 0.6 eV-b, reported by the Seattle group,
suggests a larger total \b8 solar neutrino flux. Together with the two high
precision values quoted for \s34 it is either 20% or 9% larger than measured by
SNO. While the accuracy of the Standard Solar Model has recently been
revisited, precise nuclear inputs are still relevant, but a detailed
examination of current data on \xs17 (as opposed to an examination of \S17
only) excludes quoting \S17 with sufficiently small uncertainty. In contrast to
suggestions that \S17 is now known with the (impressive) accuracy of \xpm 3%,
the exact value of \S17 is dependent on the choice of the data and the choice
of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision results
(including the Seattle data) on \xs17 which are in good agreement, still differ
on the measured slopes, as does the theory, precluding an accurate
extrapolation to zero energy of the consistent data. Using a common
extrapolation of only the consistent high precision data, suggests a value of
\S17 = 21.2 \xpm 0.5 eV-b, but a value equal to or smaller than 19.0 eV-b can
not be excluded due to the uncertainty in the extrapolation, leading to an
additional error of $^{+0.0}_{-3.0}$ eV-b. A proposal to remedy this situation
is discussed.
[46]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0307129 [pdf] - 57842
Absolute Branching Ratio of Beta-Delayed Gamma-Ray Emission of N18
Submitted: 2003-07-07, last modified: 2003-07-09
The absolute branching ratio of the beta-delayed gamma-ray emission of N18
was measured, providing absolute normalization of the previous work by Olness
et al. [J.W. Olness et al., Nuc. Phys. A373, 13 (1982)] who measured the
relative branching ratios for the individual gamma-rays. We find the total
absolute branching ratio for beta-delayed gamma emission of N18 to be 76.7 +/-
7.2(stat) +/- 5.8(norm)%. A combination of other results suggests a value
consistent with our result, but smaller than that calculated by Millener as
quoted in Olness et al.
[47]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0303009 [pdf] - 118445
Solar Fusion and The Coulomb Dissociation of 8B; What Have We Learned
and Where Do We Go From Here?
Submitted: 2003-03-23
The much needed nuclear input to the Standard Solar Model, $S_{17}(0)$, has
now been measured with high precision ($\pm$5% or better) by different groups
and good agreement is found, even when very different methods are employed. We
review the decade long research program to measure the cross section of the
$^7Be(p,\gamma)^8B$ reaction using the Coulomb dissociation method, including
the pioneering RIKEN1 experiment carried out during March 1992, followed by
RIKEN2, GSI1, GSI2 and an MSU experiment. Our RIKEN and GSI data allow us to
rule out the much tooted large E2 contribution to the Coulomb dissociation of
$^8B$. Specifically recent results of the MSU experiment are not confirmed. The
GSI1 and GSI2 high precision measurements are in good (to perfect) agreement
with the newly published high precision measurements of direct capture with
$^7Be$ targets. From these GSI-Seattle-Weizmann high precision data we conclude
that the astrophysical cross section factor, $S_{17}(0)$, is most likely in the
range of 20 - 22 eV-b. We point out to an additional large uncertainty (-10%
+3%) that still exists due to uncertainty in the measured slope of the S-factor
and the theoretical extrapolation procedure which may still lower $S_{17}(0)$
down to approximately 18.5 eV-b. For quoting $S_{17}(0)$ with an uncertainty of
$\pm$5% or better, yet another measurement needs to be performed at very low
energies, as recently discussed by the UConn-Weizmann-LLN collaboration for the
CERN/ISOLDE facility.
[48]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0303007 [pdf] - 1592171
Open Questions in Stellar Helium Burning Addressed With Real Photons
Submitted: 2003-03-20
The outcome of helium burning is the formation of the two elements, carbon
and oxygen. The ratio of carbon to oxygen at the end of helium burning is
crucial for understanding the final fate of a progenitor star and the
nucleosynthesis of heavy elements in Type II supernova, with oxygen rich star
predicted to collapse to a black hole, and a carbon rich star to a neutron
star. Type Ia supernovae (SNeIa) are used as standard candles for measuring
cosmological distances with the use of an empirical light curve-luminosity
stretching factor. It is essential to understand helium burning that yields the
carbon/oxygen white dwarf and thus the initial stage of SNeIa. Since the triple
alpha-particle capture reaction, $^{8}Be(\alpha,\gamma)^{12}C$, the first
burning stage in helium burning, is well understood, one must extract the cross
section of the $^{12}C(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}O$ reaction at the Gamow window (300
keV) with high accuracy of approximately 10% or better. This goal has not been
achieved despite repeated strong statements that appeared in the literature. In
particular constraint from the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of $^{16}N$
were shown to not sufficiently restrict the p-wave cross section factor; e.g. a
low value of $S_{E1}(300)$ can not be ruled out. Measurements at low energies,
are thus mandatory for determining the elusive cross section factor for the
$^{12}C(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}O$ reaction. We are constructing a Time Projection
Chamber (TPC) for use with high intensity photon beams extracted from the
HI$\gamma$S/TUNL facility at Duke University to study the
$^{16}O(\gamma,\alpha)^{12}C$ reaction, and thus the direct reaction at
energies as low as 0.7 MeV. This work is in progress.
[49]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0301323 [pdf] - 54294
Testing general relativity by micro-arcsecond global astrometry
Submitted: 2003-01-16
The global astrometric observations of a GAIA-like satellite were modeled
within the PPN formulation of Post-Newtonian gravitation. An extensive
experimental campaign based on realistic end-to-end simulations was conducted
to establish the sensitivity of global astrometry to the PPN parameter \gamma,
which measures the amount of space curvature produced by unit rest mass. The
results show that, with just a few thousands of relatively bright,
photometrically stable, and astrometrically well behaved single stars, among
the ~10^9 objects that will be observed by GAIA, \gamma can be estimated after
1 year of continuous observations with an accuracy of ~10^{-5} at the 3\sigma
level. Extrapolation to the full 5-year mission of these results based on the
scaling properties of the adjustment procedure utilized suggests that the
accuracy of \simeq 2x10^{-7}, at the same 3\sigma level, can be reached with
\~10^6 single stars, again chosen as the most astrometrically stable among the
millions available in the magnitude range V=12-13. These accuracies compare
quite favorably with recent findings of scalar-tensor cosmological models,
which predict for \gamma a present-time deviation, |1-\gamma|, from the General
Relativity value between 10^{-5} and 10^{-7}.
[50]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0107226 [pdf] - 387043
KeV Astrophysics With GeV Beams; Blazing a New Trail on the Summitt of
Nuclear Astrophysics
Submitted: 2001-07-12
GeV beams of light ions and electrons are used for creating a high flux of
real and virtual photons, with which some problems in Nuclear Astrophysics are
studied. GeV 8B beams are used to study the Coulomb dissociation of 8B and thus
the 7Be(p,gamma)8B reaction. This reaction is one of the major source of
uncertainties in estimating the 8B solar neutrino flux and a critical input for
calculating the 8B Solar neutrino flux. The Coulomb dissociation of 8B appears
to provide a viable method for measuring the 7Be(p,gamma)8B reaction rate, with
a weighted average of the RIKEN1, RIKEN2, GSI1 and MSU published results of
S17(0) = 18.9 +/- 1.0 eV-b. This result however does not include a theoretical
error estimated to be +/- 10 %. GeV electron beams on the other hand, are used
to create a high flux of real and virtual photons at TUNL-HIGS and MIT-Bates,
respectively, and we discuss two new proposals to study the 12C(alpha,gamma)16O
reaction with real and virtual photons. The 12C(alpha,gamma)16O reaction is
essential for understanding Type II and Type Ia supernova. It is concluded that
virtual and real photons produced by GeV light ions and electron beams are
useful for studying some problems in Nuclear Astrophysics.
[51]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/0010014 [pdf] - 118429
Precision Measurements of the 7Be(p,gamma)8B Reaction with Radioactive
Beams and the 8B Solar Neutrino Flux
Submitted: 2000-10-24, last modified: 2000-10-25
The 7Be(p,gamma)8B reaction is one of the major source of uncertainties in
estimating the 8B solar neutrino flux and is critical for undertsanding the
Solar Neutrino Problem and neutrinos. The main source of uncertainty is the
existence of conflicting data with different absolute normalization. Attempts
to measure this reaction rate with 7Be beams are under way by the UConn-LLN
collaboration, and we discuss a newly emerging method to extract this cross
section from the Coulomb dissociation of the radioactive beam of 8B. We discuss
some of the issues relevant for this study including the question of the E2
contribution to the Coulomb dissociation process which was measured to be
small. The Coulomb dissociation appears to provide a viable alternative method
for measuring the 7Be(p,gamma)8B reaction rate, with a weighted average of the
RIKEN1, RIKEN2 and GSI1 published results of S17(0) = 19.4 +/- 1.3 eV-b.
[52]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9909317 [pdf] - 108353
A Measurement of the Coulomb Dissociation of 8B at 254 MeV/nucleon and
the 8B Solar Neutrino Flux
Iwasa, N.;
Boue, F.;
Surowka, G.;
Suemmerer, K.;
Baumann, T.;
Blank, B.;
Czajkowski, S.;
Forster, A.;
Gai, M.;
Geissel, H.;
Grosse, E.;
Hellstrom, M.;
Koczon, P.;
Kohlmeyer, B.;
Kulessa, R.;
Laue, F.;
Marchand, C.;
Motobayashi, T.;
Oeschler, H.;
Ozawa, A.;
Pravikoff, M. S.;
Schwab, E.;
Schwab, W.;
Senger, P.;
Speer, J.;
Sturm, C.;
Surowiec, A.;
Teranishi, T.;
Uhlig, F.;
Wagner, A.;
Walus, W.;
Bertulani, C. A.
Submitted: 1999-09-17, last modified: 1999-10-06
We have measured the Coulomb dissociation of 8B into 7Be and proton at 254
MeV/nucleon using a large-acceptance focusing spectrometer. The astrophysical
S17 factor for the 7Be(p,gamma)8B reaction at E{c.m.} = 0.25-2.78 MeV is
deduced yielding S17(0)=20.6 \pm 1.2 (exp.) \pm 1.0 (theo.) eV-b.
This result agrees with the presently adopted zero-energy S17 factor obtained
in direct-reaction measurements and with the results of other
Coulomb-dissociation studies performed at 46.5 and 51.2 MeV/nucleon.
[53]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9809228 [pdf] - 102932
How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of N16 and Oxygen Formation in Helium
Burning?
Submitted: 1998-09-17
Contrary to claims that the problem has been solved, the astrophysical E1
S-factor of \c12ag is not yet well known. R-Matrix analyses of elastic
scattering data,\c12ag data, and data on the beta-delayed alpha-particle
emission of N16 are not consistent and a small S-factor solution SE1(300)
cannot be ruled out. In particular, data on the beta- delayed alpha-particle
emission of N16 do not agree. The unaltered Mainz data do not agree with
TRIUMF, but agree with both Seattle and Yale-UConn. The TRIUMF col- laboration
has recalibratedthe Mainz('71) data; however, we dispute both the alteration of
the Mainz data performed by the TRIUMF col- laboration and the very
justification for the recalibration.
[54]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/9809001 [pdf] - 118505
How Well Do We Know the Beta-Decay of 16N and Oxygen Formation in Helium
Burning
Submitted: 1998-09-03
We review the status of the 12C(a,g)16O reaction rate, of importance for
stellar processes in a progenitor star prior to a super-nova collapse. Several
attempts to constrain the p-wave S-factor of the 12C(a,g)16O reaction at Helium
burning temperatures (200 MK) using the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of
16N have been made, and it is claimed that this S-factor is known, as quoted by
the TRIUMF collaboration. In contrast reanalyses (by G.M. hale) of all thus far
available data (including the 16N data) does not rule out a small S-factor
solution. Furthermore, we improved our previous Yale-UConn study of the beta-
delayed alpha-particle emission of \n16 by improving our statistical sample (by
more than a factor of 5), improving the energy resolution of the experiment (by
20%), and in understanding our line shape, deduced from measured quantities.
Our newly measured spectrum of the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of 16N
is not consistent with the TRIUMF('94) data, but is consistent with the
Seattle('95) data, as well as the earlier (unaltered !) data of Mainz('71). The
implication of this discrepancies for the extracted astrophysical p-wave
s-factor is briefly discussed.
[55]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/9805121 [pdf] - 101342
Solar Fusion Cross Sections
Adelberger, E.;
Austin, S.;
Bahcall, J.;
Balantekin, A.;
Bogaert, G.;
Brown, L.;
Buchmann, L.;
Cecil, F.;
Champagne, A.;
de Braeckeleer, L.;
Duba, C.;
Elliott, S.;
Freedman, S.;
Gai, M.;
Goldring, G.;
Gould, C.;
Gruzinov, A.;
Haxton, W.;
Heeger, K.;
Henley, E.;
Johnson, C.;
Kamionkowski, M.;
Kavanagh, R.;
Koonin, S.;
Kubodera, K.;
Langanke, K.;
Motobayashi, T.;
Pandharipande, V.;
Parker, P.;
Robertson, R.;
Rolfs, C.;
Sawyer, R.;
Shaviv, N.;
Shoppa, T.;
Snover, K.;
Swanson, E.;
Tribble, R.;
Turck-Chieze, S.;
Wilkerson, J.
Submitted: 1998-05-11, last modified: 1998-05-12
We review and analyze the available information for nuclear fusion cross
sections that are most important for solar energy generation and solar neutrino
production. We provide best values for the low-energy cross-section factors
and, wherever possible, estimates of the uncertainties. We also describe the
most important experiments and calculations that are required in order to
improve our knowledge of solar fusion rates.
[56]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/9712002 [pdf] - 118501
Progress In Nuclear Astrophysics Using Secondary Radioactive Beams
Submitted: 1997-12-03
We review progress in studying two central problems in Nuclear Astrophysics:
The \be7pg reaction is one of the major source of uncertainties in estimating
the \b8 solar neutrino flux and is critical for the Solar Neutrino Problem. We
discuss a newly emerging method to extract this cross section from the Coulomb
dissociation of the radioactive beam of \b8. The Coulomb dissociation appears
to provide a viable alternative method for measuring the \be7pg reaction rate.
Several attempts to constrain the p-wave S-factor of the \c12ag reaction at
Helium burning temperatures (200 MK) using the beta-delayed alpha-particle
emission of \n16 have been made, and it is claimed that this S-factor is known,
as quoted by the TRIUMF collaboration. In contrast reanalyses (by G.M. hale) of
all thus far available data (including the \n16 data) does not rule out a small
S-factor solution. Furthermore, we improved our previous Yale-UConn study of
the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of \n16. Our newly measured spectrum
of the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of \n16 is not consistent with the
TRIUMF('94) data, but is consistent with the Seattle('95) data, as well as the
earlier (unaltered !) data of Mainz('71). The implication of this discrepancies
for the extracted astrophysical p-wave s-factor is briefly discussed.
[57]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-ex/9707008 [pdf] - 118500
Comment on Constraints on the Low-Energy E1 Cross Section of
12C(alpha,gamma)16O from the Beta-Delayed Alpha Spectrum of 16N
Submitted: 1997-07-31, last modified: 1997-09-11
We dispute the alteration by Azuma et al. of the energy calibration of the
Mainz('71) data on the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of $^{16}N$ as well
as the very justification of the recalibration. We use the unaltered data to
observe a pronounced disagreement between the TRIUMF('94) and Mainz('71) data
sets on both the high and low energy sides of the primary peak (at 2.36 MeV) of
the $^{16}N$ alpha-spectrum. We cannot support the dismissal of the Mainz('71)
spectrum by the TRIUMF collaboration and emphasize the need to include it in
R-matrix fits. We discuss the need for new improved data to resolve this
disagreement and its implication for the extracted p-wave astrophysical
S-factor of the $^{12}C(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}O$ reaction.
[58]
oai:arXiv.org:nucl-th/9502036 [pdf] - 1477372
NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS WITH SECONDARY (RADIOACTIVE) BEAMS
Submitted: 1995-02-15
Some problems in nuclear astrophysics are discussed with emphasize on the
ones central to the field which were not solved over the last two decades,
including Helium Burning in Massive stars (the 12C(a,g)16O reaction) and the 8B
Solar Neutrino Flux Problem (the 7Be(p,g)8B reaction). We demonstrate that a
great deal of progress was achieved by measuring the time reverse process(es):
the beta-delayed alpha-particle emission of 16N and the Coulomb dissociation of
8B, using radioactive beams (of 16N and 8B). In this way an amplification of
the sought for cross section was achieved, allowing a measurement of the small
cross section(s) of relevance for stellar (solar) process(es).