Normalized to: Gaga, T.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507534 [pdf] - 133720
The XMM-Newton/2dF survey-VIII: The extended X-ray sources
Submitted: 2005-07-22, last modified: 2005-09-14
We present a sample of eight extended X-ray sources detected in the
wide-field (~2.3 deg^2), bright (2-10 ksec) XMM-Newton/2dF survey, reaching a
flux limit of ~2 X 10^{-14} erg/s/cm^2. Of these, seven are identified as
secure X-ray clusters in the soft 0.3-2 keV band using a standard wavelet
algorithm on either the PN or the MOS images. Spectroscopic or photometric
redshifts are available for five clusters, spanning a range between 0.12 and
0.68. The X-ray spectral fittings show temperatures between 1 and 4.6 keV,
characteristic of poor clusters and groups of galaxies. We derive for the first
time the XMM-Newton cluster number count log N-log S distribution albeit with
poor statistics. Both the log N-\log S and the Luminosity-Temperature relation
are in good agreement with previous ROSAT results.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0503409 [pdf] - 133713
The Serendipitous XMM-Newton Cluster Athens Survey (SEXCLAS): Sample
selection and the cluster log N - log S
Submitted: 2005-03-18
In this paper we serendipitously identify X-ray cluster candidates using
XMM-Newton archival observations complemented by 5-band optical photometric
follow-up observations (r~23 mag) as part of the X-ray Identification (XID)
programme. Our sample covers an area of ~2.1 sq. deg (15 XMM-Newton fields) and
comprises a total of 21 (19 serendipitous + 2 target) extended X-ray sources to
the limit f(0.5-2keV) ~ 6x10^{-15} cgs with a high probability (> 99.9%) of
being extended on the XMM-Newton images. Of the 21 cluster candidates 7 are
spectroscopically confirmed in the literature. Exploiting the optical data
available for these fields we discover that 68% of the X-ray cluster candidates
are associated with optical galaxy overdensities. We also attempt to constrain
the redshifts of our cluster candidates using photometric methods. We thus
construct the photometric redshift distribution of galaxies in the vicinity of
each X-ray selected cluster candidate and search for statistically significant
redshift peaks against that of the background distribution of field galaxies.
Comparison of the photometric with spectroscopic redshift estimates for the
confirmed clusters suggest that our simple method is robust out to z~0.5. For
clusters at higher z, deeper optical data are required to estimate reliable
photometric redshifts. Finally, using the sample of the 19 serendipitous X-ray
selected cluster candidates we estimate their surface density down to
f(0.5-2keV) ~ 6x10^{-15} cgs and find it to be in fair agreement with previous
and recent studies.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310136 [pdf] - 59799
The XMM/2dF survey III: Comparison between optical and X-ray cluster
detection methods
Submitted: 2003-10-06, last modified: 2004-03-16
We directly compare X-ray and optical techniques of cluster detection by
combining SDSS photometric data with a wide-field ($\sim 1.8$ deg$^{2}$)
XMM-{\em Newton} survey in the North Galactic Pole region. The optical cluster
detection procedure is based on merging two independent selection methods - a
smoothing+percolation technique, and a Matched Filter Algorithm. The X-ray
cluster detection is based on a wavelet-based algorithm, incorporated in the
SAS v.5.2 package. The final optical sample counts 9 candidate clusters with
richness of more than 20 galaxies, corresponding roughly to APM richness class.
Three, of our optically detected clusters are also detected in our X-ray
survey. The most probable cause of the small number of optical cluster
candidates detected in our X-ray survey is that they are relatively poor
clusters, fainter than the X-ray flux limit (for extended sources) of our
survey $f_{x}(0.3-2 {\rm keV}) \simeq 2 \times 10^{-14} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}$.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310356 [pdf] - 60019
The XMM-2df Cluster Survey
Submitted: 2003-10-14
We present the results from a shallow (2-10 ksec) XMM/2dF survey. Our survey
covers 18 XMM fields ($\sim 5 {\rm deg}^2$) previously spectroscopically
followed up with the Anglo-Australian telescope 2-degree field facility. About
half of the fields are also covered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We
are searching for extended sources using the XMM SAS maximum likelihood
algorithm in the 0.3-2 keV band and we have detected 14 candidate clusters down
to a flux of $\sim2\times10^{-14} cgs$. Our preliminary results show that: i)
the redshift distribution peaks at relatively high redshifts ($\sim0.4$) as
expected from the Rosati et al. $\Phi(L)$, ii) some of our X-ray clusters
appear to have optical counterparts.
[5]
oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0310249 [pdf] - 59912
Comparison between optical and X-ray cluster detection methods
Submitted: 2003-10-09
In this work we present combined optical and X-ray cluster detection methods
in an area near the North Galactic Pole area, previously covered by the SDSS
and 2dF optical surveys. The same area has been covered by shallow ($\sim 1.8$
deg$^{2}$) XMM-{\em Newton} observations. The optical cluster detection
procedure is based on merging two independent selection methods - a
smoothing+percolation technique, and a Matched Filter Algorithm. The X-ray
cluster detection is based on a wavelet-based algorithm, incorporated in the
SAS v.5.2 package. The final optical sample counts 9 candidate clusters with
richness of more than 20 galaxies, corresponding roughly to APM richness class.
Three, of our optically detected clusters are also detected in our X-ray
survey.