Normalized to: Gómez-Herrero, R.
[1]
oai:arXiv.org:1701.04057 [pdf] - 1534570
The Solar Orbiter Mission: an Energetic Particle Perspective
Gómez-Herrero, R.;
Rodríguez-Pacheco, J.;
Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F.;
Mason, G. M.;
Sánchez-Prieto, S.;
Martín, C.;
Prieto, M.;
Ho, G. C.;
Lara, F. Espinosa;
Cernuda, I.;
Blanco, J. J.;
Russu, A.;
Polo, O. Rodríguez;
Kulkarni, S. R.;
Terasa, C.;
Panitzsch, L.;
Böttcher, S. I.;
Boden, S.;
Heber, B.;
Steinhagen, J.;
Tammen, J.;
Köhler, J.;
Drews, C.;
Elftmann, R.;
Ravanbakhsh, A.;
Seimetz, L.;
Schuster, B.;
Yedla, M.;
Valtonen, E.;
Vainio, R.
Submitted: 2017-01-15
Solar Orbiter is a joint ESA-NASA mission planed for launch in October 2018.
The science payload includes remote-sensing and in-situ instrumentation
designed with the primary goal of understanding how the Sun creates and
controls the heliosphere. The spacecraft will follow an elliptical orbit around
the Sun, with perihelion as close as 0.28 AU. During the late orbit phase the
orbital plane will reach inclinations above 30 degrees, allowing direct
observations of the solar polar regions. The Energetic Particle Detector (EPD)
is an instrument suite consisting of several sensors measuring electrons,
protons and ions over a broad energy interval (2 keV to 15 MeV for electrons, 3
keV to 100 MeV for protons and few tens of keV/nuc to 450 MeV/nuc for ions),
providing composition, spectra, timing and anisotropy information. We present
an overview of Solar Orbiter from the energetic particle perspective,
summarizing the capabilities of EPD and the opportunities that these new
observations will provide for understanding how energetic particles are
accelerated during solar eruptions and how they propagate through the
Heliosphere.
[2]
oai:arXiv.org:1603.00676 [pdf] - 1371625
Annual Cosmic Ray Spectra from 250 MeV up to 1.6 GeV from 1995 - 2014
Measured With the Electron Proton Helium Instrument onboard SOHO
Submitted: 2016-03-02
The solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) can be studied in detail
by examining long-term variations of the GCR energy spectrum (e.g. on the
scales of a solar cycle). With almost 20 years of data, the Electron Proton
Helium INstrument (EPHIN) onboard the SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO)
is well suited for this kind of investigation. Although the design of the
instrument is optimized to measure proton and helium isotope spectra up to 50
MeV nucleon$^{-1}$ , the capability exists to determine proton energy spectra
from 250 MeV up to above 1.6 GeV. Therefore we developed a sophisticated
inversion method to calculate such proton spectra. The method relies on a
GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulation of the instrument and a simplified spacecraft
model that calculates the energy-response function of EPHIN for electrons,
protons and heavier ions. For validation purposes, proton spectra based on this
method are compared to various balloon missions and space instrumentation. As a
result we present annual galactic cosmic ray spectra from 1995 to 2014.
[3]
oai:arXiv.org:1309.1344 [pdf] - 716029
Simultaneous Analysis of Recurrent Jovian Electron Increases and
Galactic Cosmic Ray Decreases
Kühl, P.;
Dresing, N.;
Dunzlaff, P.;
Fichtner, H.;
Gieseler, J.;
Gómez-Herrero, R.;
Heber, B.;
Klassen, A.;
Kleimann, J.;
Kopp, A.;
Potgieter, M.;
Scherer, K.;
Strauss, R. D.
Submitted: 2013-09-05
The transport environment for particles in the heliosphere, e.g. galactic
cosmic rays (GCRs) and MeV electrons (including those originating from Jupiters
magnetosphere), is defined by the solar wind flow and the structure of the
embedded heliospheric magnetic field. Solar wind structures, such as
co-rotating interaction regions (CIR), can result in periodically modulation of
both particles species. A detailed analysis of this recurrent Jovian electron
events and galactic cosmic ray decreases measured by SOHO EPHIN is presented
here, showing clearly a change of phase between both phenomena during the cause
of the years 2007 and 2008. This effect can be explained by the change of
difference in heliolongitude between the Earth and Jupiter, which is of central
importance for the propagation of Jovian electrons. Furthermore, the data can
be ordered such that the 27-day Jovian electron variation vanishes in the
sector which does not connect the Earth with Jupiter magnetically using
observed solar wind speeds.
[4]
oai:arXiv.org:1206.1520 [pdf] - 1511791
The large longitudinal spread of solar energetic particles during the
January 17, 2010 solar event
Submitted: 2012-06-07
We investigate multi-spacecraft observations of the January 17, 2010 solar
energetic particle event. Energetic electrons and protons have been observed
over a remarkable large longitudinal range at the two STEREO spacecraft and
SOHO suggesting a longitudinal spread of nearly 360 degrees at 1AU. The flaring
active region, which was on the backside of the Sun as seen from Earth, was
separated by more than 100 degrees in longitude from the magnetic footpoints of
each of the three spacecraft. The event is characterized by strongly delayed
energetic particle onsets with respect to the flare and only small or no
anisotropies in the intensity measurements at all three locations. The presence
of a coronal shock is evidenced by the observation of a type II radio burst
from the Earth and STEREO B. In order to describe the observations in terms of
particle transport in the interplanetary medium, including perpendicular
diffusion, a 1D model describing the propagation along a magnetic field line
(model 1) (Dr\"oge, 2003) and the 3D propagation model (model 2) by (Dr\"oge et
al., 2010) including perpendicular diffusion in the interplanetary medium have
been applied, respectively. While both models are capable of reproducing the
observations, model 1 requires injection functions at the Sun of several hours.
Model 2, which includes lateral transport in the solar wind, reveals high
values for the ratio of perpendicular to parallel diffusion. Because we do not
find evidence for unusual long injection functions at the Sun we favor a
scenario with strong perpendicular transport in the interplanetary medium as
explanation for the observations.