We report results of an HST "snapshot" survey aimed at finding resolved binary companions of the central stars of Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe). Using WF/PC and WFPC2, we searched the fields of 113 PNe for stars whose close proximity to the central star suggests a physical association. We find 10 binary nuclei that are very likely to be physically associated, and another six that are possible binary associations. By correcting for interstellar extinction and placing the central stars' companions on the main sequence, we derive distances to the objects, and thereby significantly increase the number of PNe with reliable distances. Comparison of our derived distances with those obtained from various statistical methods shows that all of the latter have systematically overestimated the distances, by factors ranging up to a factor of two or more. We show that this error is most likely due to the fact that the properties of our PNe with binary nuclei are systematically different from those of PNe used heretofore to calibrate statistical methods. Specifically, our PNe tend to have lower surface brightnesses at the same physical radius than the traditional calibration objects. This difference may arise from a selection effect: the PNe in our survey are typically nearby, old nebulae, whereas most of the objects that calibrate statistical techniques are low-latitude, high-surface-brightness, and more distant nebulae. As a result, the statistical methods that seem to work well with samples of distant PNe, e.g., those in the Galactic bulge or external galaxies, may not be applicable to the more diverse population of local PNe.

We have used the WFPC2 camera on the Hubble Space Telescope to obtain photometry of the outer-halo globular clusters Palomar 3, Palomar 4, and Eridanus. These three are classic examples of the "second parameter" anomaly because of their red horizontal-branch morphologies in combination with their low-to-intermediate metallicities. Our color-magnitude diagrams in (V, V-I) reach $V_{lim} \simeq 27.0$, clearly delineating the subgiant and turnoff regions and about three magnitudes of the unevolved main sequences. The slopes and dereddened colors of the giant branches are consistent with published [Fe/H] estimates that rank the clusters (Pal 3, Eridanus, Pal 4) in order of increasing metallicity, with all three falling near or between the abundance values of the classic nearby halo clusters M3 and M5. Differential fits of their color-magnitude diagrams are made to each other and to M3 and M5 for relative age determinations. We find that the three outer-halo cluster CMDs differ from the nearby clusters in a way that is consistent with their being younger by $\sim 1.5 - 2 $Gyr, if we have correctly estimated the clusters' chemical-abundance ratios. Conversely, the inferred age difference could be smaller ($\ltsim 1 $Gyr) if either [Fe/H] or [$\alpha$/Fe] for the outer-halo clusters is significantly lower than we have assumed. Possible age spreads of order 1$ $Gyr among both the nearby and outer-halo clusters may also be present.